Princess Beatrice hates ‘vacuous & pushy’ Duchess Kate & Pippa Middleton

wenn21603694

Considering their parents, I’ve always thought that the York princesses turned out rather well. They both seem like healthy, well-adjusted young women and they’re not afraid to work and take on interesting projects. I think they’ve been ill-served by their parents though. Instead of preparing them for royal lives that would become increasingly irrelevant, Prince Andrew has always insisted that his daughters are blood princesses and should take on major roles in public life. Prince Charles has always disagreed – Charles wants to make the royal family more streamlined and when the Queen dies, it’s widely believed that Charles will phase his siblings and their children out of royal life in favor of William, Harry and their wives and children.

That’s part of the background on this story. Also background: there’s been a long-simmering beef between the York sisters and the Middleton sisters for years now. It’s been said that Kate and Pippa cannot stand Beatrice and Eugenie, and vice versa. There has been anecdotal evidence to back up those claims, but most royal reporters ignore the alleged feud. Until now.

According to gossip doing the rounds, Beatrice, who is sixth in line of succession to the throne, feels “overshadowed” by Kate and has become “resentful” of the worldwide interest in her. This febrile chatter has now been amplifi ed by an Australian magazine, Woman’s Day, which has reported that “while Kate has been winning hearts around the world, Beatrice and her sister Eugenie have been relegated to attending garden parties and cutting ribbons”.

The magazine claims that Beatrice, 26, “complains to friends that Kate – the ‘Chosen One’ – ‘gets the glamour jobs, the clothing allowance, the limos and the bodyguards, while I have to travel economy’”.

It says that Beatrice makes openly snide remarks about Kate and her sister Pippa, whom she describes as “vacuous” and “pushy”. Beatrice, the elder daughter of Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson, is alleged to have called Kate “a commoner” and to have made withering comments about Kate’s determination to maintain a slim frame.

The report adds that Beatrice, whose most recent job has been as an intern at Sony Pictures in London, was scheduled to announce her engagement to her boyfriend of seven years Dave Clark but before she could go public Kate “hogged the limelight again” with the announcement of her second pregnancy.

For some time there has been talk, not reported by the magazine, that William and Harry do not get on with Dave, who works for Sir Richard Branson. It has been said that they view him as “too flash”. When I raised the subject of a rift with a friend who is close to William and Kate, it was quickly dismissed as mischievous tittle-tattle. He added: “It’s not true; Beatrice is too good-natured to say those sort of things. She admires Kate.”

[From Express]

Wow. I mean… wow. I’d always assumed that Beatrice felt that way, but it’s fascinating to see it in print. And I’m erring more on the side of believing that Beatrice bad-mouths Kate to friends than believing that Beatrice “admires Kate.” Here’s my take: Beatrice does have a right to feel angry at being relegated to a “second-class royal” because of Kate. That’s what’s happening, and as Duchess Or Diva always says, Kate IS a diva. Everything is always about Kate. Part of that is Kate herself, part of that is being married to a man who will be king, and part of that is how the media coddles Kate. Now, all that being said… Prince Andrew really should have prepared his daughters for this. This was always the way it was going to be. Even if William had married a woman with less dramatic flair and more of a work ethic, it still would be this way. Beatrice and Eugenie should have been prepared for lives of incremental royal obscurity.

wenn21851171

wenn21851199

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

187 Responses to “Princess Beatrice hates ‘vacuous & pushy’ Duchess Kate & Pippa Middleton”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Lex says:

    Haha if they don’t like it, one of them should have married William.. hahah

    • Someonestolemyname says:

      Anyone remember that story Katie Nicholl wrote about when Kate had the day glo party-charity at a club and Katie Nicholl supposedly saw Kate and Beatrice talking, then Beatrice went into the bathroom, Katie Nicholl followed and Beatrice was crying over something supposedly Kate had done. The story had direct quotes from Beatrice…..I cant remember what Kate had supposedly done, but the story was quite revealing in that the two were never going to get on as friends. Imo

      Not that I believe this current story, but I honestly dont think Kate and the York Princesses are friends.

      There is video of the first Christmas(Boxiing Day ?) Kate attended with William and the Yorks, I think in that video there was a lot of indication that the york sisters and kate just don’t get on.

  2. Ollyholly says:

    No royal deserves ANYTHING, let alone first class flights, money for clothing, or limos. She should be happy with what she gets and be glad the British public hasn’t stripped the monarchy bare yet.

    Poor her, not enough undeserved free things! Ridiculous.

    • Jag says:

      +100000

    • Lori says:

      Her mother spoiled things for her. Sarah’s shenanigans really pissed off dear old Grampa and that has more influence on how those girls are treated than anything Kate Middleton does.

    • Godwina says:

      Ha, so true.

    • L says:

      Exactly. And the “I was going to announce my engagment, and then Kate had to hog the attention with another PREGNANCY” Common now. That is Beatrice trying to make it all about her-what was she expecting-Kate to hide being pregnant for 9 months so she could have her wedding moment? Or to plan her pregnancy around Beatrice’s schedule?

      Beatrice sounds like a brat-relegated to garden parties and ribbon cutting? That’s what second tier royals DO. And sadly ladies, that’s what you are now. (Now shading Pippa-THAT I’m totally fine with)

    • Mia V. says:

      Oh, she has to fly economy! Go find a job and earn your paycheck, not depend on the “commoners”. Soooo stupid.

    • LadySlippers says:

      •OllyHolly•

      This article is most likely false.

      • bettyrose says:

        Seriously. I highly doubt these girls fly economy. Maybe they don’t get all the perks Kate has, but they’re still as privileged as other non-royal aristocracy.

      • LadySlippers says:

        •bettyrose•

        Many Royals (notably the younger Royals) and even the Middleton’s have flown economy. It’s not a huge deal for them.

      • bettyrose says:

        But Kate technically is not from aristocracy. I’d believe that second tier princesses and “middle class” social climbers occasionally fly business class, but no one with options flies trans-Atlantic in coach.

      • LadySlippers says:

        •bettyrose•

        The Middleton’s aren’t aristocracy. Period/Full Stop.

        Actually all the younger Royals have been snapped and tweeted about while flying in coach. That includes Harry and both York sisters. Can’t remember if William and Kate have as well but I’d guess yes if asked.

    • Chammy says:

      I don’t like Kate. Lazy workshy flashy waste of time and money.
      And I fully believe that the Middleton girls and the York girls don’t get along.
      But that won’t make me like Beatrice.

      Those taxpayer-supported royals don’t deliver much performance for Britain. The official number for supporting the Royal Family is something around 35 Mio Pounds. The security cost is additional.
      The British should start questioning the Royal Family and think if they want to keep a RF as those are the ones who keep the class system very much alive.

  3. I live in Oz says:

    This story has been hashed, rehashed, gurgitated and regurgitated over and over again by Woman’s Day magazine. Must be a slow news week as that’s when they tend to run it.

    • LadySlippers says:

      •I live in Oz•

      Yup. And there’s lots of errors in the main story. Plus, at the end someone says that Bea is too sweet to say any of that.

    • FLORC says:

      Yea. Nothing of this story feels like truth. Little bit of truth got “rehashed” until it’s completely fabricated.
      Like “Beatrice breaths the air to live says a friend.” To “Beatrice curses Kate with every breath she takes in her economy seat.”

  4. wrong says:

    beatrice sounds like a jealous child GROW UP

  5. jane says:

    Perhaps the princess is just jealous.

  6. Lucky says:

    This just makes her sound like more of a diva than Kate supposedly is- how ridiculous. Kate is going to be queen- of course there is more public interest in her- I think you’re right that it i parental failure but as a seemingly bright adult she can look at history and realize the same for herself. Was her father more well known and loved than Diana? No.

    • wrong says:

      Exactly

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      Right. Look back at history. No one in her position, that I can think of, was ever more than a minor figure. Get over it. Go get a job (perhaps a real one this time) and get on with your privileged life. So sorry you won’t be the constant center of attention. Please. No patience for this whatsoever.

      • LadySlippers says:

        •GoodNames•

        The story is most likely false. I’ve never read that Bea holds grudges or is anything but super sweet. I think the original story is trying recreate a cat-fight between Diana’s line and Sarah’s line. Approach these kinds of stories with extreme caution.

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        Good advice.

      • booboocita says:

        Oh, it’s happened … but usually because a whole bunch of royals died first without producing viable (read: legitimate) issue to ascend the throne. Victoria was supposed to be a minor royal, a “Lady” or “Duchess” at most, but became queen because her uncles and aunts either died without issue, produced illegitimate children, or their legitimate children died. The king at the time, William IV, became king only because his elder brothers, George IV and Frederick, Duke of York, died without legitimate issue (George IV produced ten — count ’em, TEN — illegitimate children with an Irish actress). William IV himself had two daughters, both who died in childhood. So the daughter of the Duke of Kent, a “nobody” royal, younger brother of William IV and George IV, and son of George III, became Queen.

        For Beatrice to become Queen or even heir apparent, the following people would have to die: the Queen, Charles (the heir apparent); William (heir presumptive); baby George; Anne, Princess Royal (Anne’s children are not part of the succession); and Andrew, Duke of York. That’s a lot of family to plow through to get free swag — um, I mean — a crown.

      • Feeshalori says:

        Yep, I’m usually willing to dive into the mud pit and sling a few mud patties around, but this doesn’t strike me as what I’ve heard and read of Beatrice, and even her sister Eugenie. Both girls have always come across as amiable and charming to me, most likely due to the efforts of their parents who made a mess of their own marriage and post-marriage but seemed to have brought their daughters up right. Even if any of this were true, I doubt Beatrice would put it out to the media.

      • LadySlippers says:

        •booboocita•

        Victoria’s father got married with the sole purpose of providing an heir/heiress. Otherwise he was quite content to be a backwater nobody of a prince.

        Also, ‘heir presumptive’ in not the correct term for William. Using the term ‘presumptive’ means the person can be displaced in the line of succession (as opposed to ‘apparent’ which means they are next in line barring their own death). Example, Caroline of Hanover is currently heiress presumptive to the throne in Monaco. She’s not heiress apparent as Albert’s children can and will displace her. Harry, prior to George’s birth, would have been an heir presumptive to both heir apparents (Charles and William respectively). So William is heir apparent to the heir apparent.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Isn’t Beatrice likely to end up as a Counsellor of State? Whether or not she ends up being a working royal, she’s still going to be involved in the workings of the BRF in the future.

        “Counsellors of State are appointed from among the following: The Duke of Edinburgh and the four adults next in succession (provided they have reached the age of 21). These are currently The Prince of Wales, Prince William of Wales, Prince Harry of Wales and The Duke of York.”

        Potentially Counsellors of State will be Kate Middleton, PG Tips, Baby #2, Prince Harry, and Princess Beatrice (if The Duke of York has passed away at that point).

  7. Prairiegirl says:

    Exactly, Kaiser, exactly.

  8. Fit? says:

    I just feel for Kate – she is out of her element, I don’t think she will ever rise to the occasion. She’s not a good fit for this role.
    Yeash at least she should try to get that maniacal grin under control

    • wrong says:

      She is doing fine. There are pictures with this article she is not so called grinning and yet you still say something about it. kate can’t help it that the media is printing only the pictures of her smiling can she?

      • Anne says:

        The grin is a little strange, honestly. It’s in the eyes.

      • FLORC says:

        Anne
        A while back this was a big topic here. Why smiles appear genuine and why they don’t. A forced smile vs a genuine smile. We unknowingly pick up on the subtle movements in the face. If the movements are missing we feel uneasy about the persons smile. There was a test link too. 30 people smiling and you’d pick real or fake. and you only had a few seconds of video to watch and couldn’t rewatch it.

        Kate has a few grins. Super excited (exiting transport to applauding fans), Happy (usually while doing something athletic), and forced. Smiling for cameras and meeting people.
        The science behind it is interesting.

        Also, Kate has had work done on her face, veneers, underbite, and thin lips. This doesn’t help peoples perceptions. HAving work done changes a natural look to the face and the rest of it doesn’t match up.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      I think Kate has everything she ever wanted, and her “job” is to have children, look pretty and support William, all of which she does well. I think it’s a shame that she doesn’t work harder and take advantage of her brilliant opportunities to be a real help to people, but I think William is perfectly happy that she doesn’t, because he doesn’t, either. So I don’t see any reason for you to feel sorry for a woman who has fulfilled her every dream in life. I’d feel sorry for the people paying for it.

      • Bess says:

        I wonder if Kate is ever going to get tired of living separate life from her husband. At some point, Kate’s not going to be able to run home to her parents. Carol is not going to be able to steer Kate and giver her advice forever. What is she going to do without her mom doing all of the scheming and positioning for her?

      • DrMrsTheMonarch says:

        GNAT,

        I think that this (her not doing as much for the Royal Family) is more William’s doing than anyone else. He has to remember being raised by nannys, then losing his mother at an incredibly young age. He has to remember her absence from his life, first because she was always working for charities, and then because she was dead.

        I’d bet he’s happy to have a wife who seems to want less of the public spotlight. They both seem to want to raise their child in as normal a manner as they are allowed,

      • epiphany says:

        @Bess – Kate and William are living separate lives? I thought their marriage, overall, was quite happy and stable. Please elaborate, if you will.

      • FLORC says:

        epiphany
        It’s no secret Kate and William barely reside under the same roof anymore.
        And even by Kate’s own admission William barely was around for Georges first 6 months of life.
        He had a private residence for his Cambridge bespoke program while Kate was at her parents home. Currently he’s up on his own getting his training for his new job while Kate is at her parents home. And she’s been spotted there for long before her illness was announced.

        Also, we can go back further to when they lived in the wales cottage. Kate would have car service pick her up at her parents home daily to shop or do events while William was often spotted in wales or a vacation with his time off instead of with his wife. As time went on Tanna and some random citizens caught so much evidence of Kate living with her parents and William living elsewhere it was hard to ignore or write off as just visits. Especially with heavy security presence that Kate and George demand always at her parents home.
        In the end it works for them and might be what it takes to be happy and stable. It’s not unheard of to do this.

    • Jen says:

      Maniacal grin? WTF? You people are insane.

      • Candice says:

        The maniacal grin is one of her trademarks for goodness sake ! ICYMI Kate is not known for her depth and sincerity and any positivity we see comes across as forced and fake. Royals like Harry Sophie and the late Diana are/were the real deal IMO.

      • Bohemia says:

        Has anyone watched the videos of her attending these events? I cringe with all the camera flashes. You can feel the pressure on this girl. It’s palpable. Personally, I think people are WAY too harsh on Kate.

        But this happened to Diana, too. After the media honeymoon, the press turned on her, even during her early years of marriage to Charles. Seems like history repeating itself.

      • FLORC says:

        Bohemia
        I don’t see how history so far supports this.
        And mostly from the simple truths that Diana was a young bride and naive to the pressures awaiting her. Kate has had 10 years before marriage to become adept at the press game and she did. Also, Diana had seperate motives with Charles than Kate with William. Kate knows the game. Diana was shell shocked when she found this out.

        Also, the events aren’t bad. She walks, smiles, and doesn’t look like she’s under loads of stress from the moment she exits a car to the moment she enters. And her smile is also refered to a “cat got the cream” smile.

    • Someonestolemyname says:

      The only thing I believe Kate worries about is keeping William and since she has produced an heir and soon to be spare, that part is done.

      It was said her mother’s advice to her was just keep William happy and things will always work out.

      The only thing Kate really has to be concerned about is IF and that’s a big IF William ever wants out of the marriage, because then she will see the true colors of what the Royal house truly thinks of her.

      All she has to do is keep Willie boy happy and she’ll be fine.
      IMO The press won’t turn on Kate as long as she’s Prince William’s wife and future Queen.

      I dont belive the Beatrice is jealous of her success story….but what I do believe is that the York Princesses and Kate, Pippa are simply never going to be friends. I think they don’t especially care for each other, but I think that all started when Kate was dating William.

  9. Anne says:

    I can see Beatrice disliking Kate but I can’t see her resenting Kate’s level of publicity. I think that aspect of the report is overblown.
    The York sisters grew up with intensive, negative media coverage of their mother (“The Duchess of Pork”). I can imagine that, like William, they would be wary of courting media attention and more than happy to fly under the radar.
    The sycophantic coverage of Kate just goes with the role. It’s reserved for William’s wife, whether that’s Kate Middleton or anyone else.

    • We Are All Made of Stars says:

      Yes, exactly. Does this magazine seriously expect anyone to believe that she and her sister are crazier and more shallow than Kate and Pippa? I can’t believe how many people are taking this at face value.

      • Olenna says:

        This.

      • The Original Mia says:

        Well…is it really so hard to believe that people are buying this story? People hate the York sisters by extension of their parents. People don’t see them as working, living their lives. They have to be spoiled and pampered, but how is that any different from workshy Kate and her hanger-on sister Pippa? The Yorks will always be royal and have the love and respect of their family. Kate’s popularity and that of Pippa depends on Kate’s marriage to William. If she loses him and thereby her status within the royal family, she’s just another divorced royal. Won’t matter about George or the new baby because they’ll be too young to keep her in the spotlight. Especially if William finds another woman to be his Queen Consort.

      • FLORC says:

        We Are All Made Of Stars
        Didn’t you know if you read it on the internet it must be true? And you know I speak the truth because it’s information you’re reading online.

      • Pippa Mids says:

        B*E Yorks were raised at BP withe Zara Peter and the princes. With their GRannie – waitry and the Middletons have nothing B*E want!

        B*E may be sad they are cut off from Wills child/ren due to Waity insecurities but they still close to P Harry. Will may be middleton doolittle work ethics but he better do as HM. And dad POW for the monarchy and the wealth papered lifestyle over the middletons hence, the ongoing fighting. with doolittle and countdown (after baby 2).

    • lithe says:

      I wholeheartedly agree @Anne.

    • Sunny says:

      I totally agree with your statements. I can see the York sisters finding Kate vacuous and pushy(she is) but I cannot see them resenting the media attention. It seems to me that many of the royals hate the media focus.

      And say what you want about Kate, she does her job of looking pretty and having babies. It is terribly disappointing she doesn’t use her voice for good but she doesn’t seem interested in the plight of the poor or downtrodden.

      • Bohemia says:

        But Kate is only 3 years into her marriage. Diana did not truly find her voice (as far as charity work) until much later into her marriage, and after it as well.

        Also, doesn’t she do work for Addiction in Action (sorry if I got the name wrong)? People with addictions are often poor and downtrodden.

      • FLORC says:

        Bohemia
        Diana did find more of a passionate approach to her charities later on, but she also worked more early on. And Kate only visits her charities maybe once a year. I’m not counting events that are padding to her overall total and I’m not including galas, but more of a sit down or raise awareness approach. Not a get an invite and dress up to hear others talk about the charity. Mostly, because if we’re comparing Kate’s situation to Diana’s let’s stick to the common links.

    • Someonestolemyname says:

      Well said Anne.
      Totally agree.

  10. Lucy2 says:

    I can buy that they don’t all love each other to death, but the jealousy thing seems more far fetched. I’ve never gotten the impression that the York girls care about that sort of thing that much. If they wanted to be more famous, they would be.

    • LadySlippers says:

      •Lucy2•

      Very true. Most families have their issues but I also don’t buy that the York princesses long to be more in the spotlight. If anything, it’s the opposite.

    • CC says:

      Just the same old. The male-male jealousy is always sugarcoated as “respect” by the press. Women-women is ALWAYS about endless bickering and backstabbing.

  11. Red Snapper says:

    It must kill Beatrice to watch Kate flash her bare ass every month with no negative repercussions, while Fergie is a reviled laughingstock.

    • Lori says:

      Sarah tried to “sell” meets with her ex husband the perv. Kate’s bum should be the least of Beatrice’s worries.

      • janefr says:

        True, but she was mocked and hated on loooong before that.

      • Someonestolemyname says:

        Yes but Kate in her first three or four years of marriage has done way more in the way of mishaps than Sarah did at the same point and Sarah was being derrided by the press, for wearing bad outfits and spending.

        Kate has already had a worldwide topless episode in the first three years of her marriage and numerous wardrobe ass baring malfunctions and huge spending and does little royal work, yet it gets glossed over by the press……because shes married to the future heir and he has to stay somewhat as golden as the press can manage.

        Sarah in the early years was a hardworking Royal wife , wearing some bad outfits,but she was learning to fly helicopters and writing her first budgie books, but all the press could do was put her down call her the Pork of York .

        Ingrid Seward said several times, when she wanted to print something negative she knew about William ,that she was told by Palace handlers William has to stay golden we’ll give you a story on Harry instead. Ingrid said Harry was always being used as collateral damage to cover up something William had done ,that the press was getting wind of, but did not dare release, because deals were made to use a negative Harry instead.

        Kate will get kid glove adoring treatment by the UK press as long as she stays married to William. If they ever divorce, her press will change greatly,
        Even if she is mother to future heir.

  12. tracking says:

    Bunch of spoiled brats, all of them.

  13. zan says:

    Kate is gorgeous in that blue dress

  14. Itsnotthatserious says:

    Wasn’t their mom Fergie vacuous and pushy, a commoner to boot. I don’t believe they said anything but you know, women always has to be catty.

    • Bohemia says:

      I suppose the headline, “York Sisters Have No Opinion on Kate Either Way, Describe Her as ‘Fine'” wouldn’t sell as many papers. 😉

    • Someonestolemyname says:

      Fergie was pushy yes and common yes, but she was , is part of the Aristocracy and gentry even though not titled before marriage. Her mother’s family had titles.
      She was Diana’s cousin , grew up playing with Andrew , knew Diana and was invited to Charles and Diana’s Royal wedding as Diana’s friend, long before dating Andrew,.

  15. Megan says:

    The Yorks are minimally employed, constantly partying, and living off the largess of their father. Why should they be jealous of the Cambridges?

    • LadySlippers says:

      •Megan•

      Not true though.

      • bluhare says:

        I actually agree with Megan. I know Eugenie has been working at the auction house in NY although I wonder how tough it is, but Beatrice has flitted around from job to job and takes a lot of vacations with her boyfriend. “Most recent” job was an intern at Sony? That implies she’s not working. She’s had enough jobs she ought to have a career by now.

        But I say this as someone who’s never thought they’re all that and a bag of chips.

    • FLORC says:

      Megan
      What? Constantly partying? I can only assume any evidence you’re refering to is Bea or Eug exiting a pub that they were said to have after work drinks with coworkers maybe once a week. And they never spent too long there.
      As far as working minimally there’s too much out there that proves otherwise.
      And also living off their father? Both girls live modest lifestyles and within their limits, but budgeting out funds for charity work often and on their own money/time.

      • LadySlippers says:

        •Florc•

        Most people don’t know this (Royal Loonies like you prob do) but Bea, like her father, doesn’t drink alcohol. So the tabloid reports of her in her late teens/early 20’s drinking were false. Eug, on the other hand, does drink. And smoke.

        Actually, Andrew (with his various trust funds) did purchase a flat for his daughters a few years back. It was in Chelsea, I believe, and while it wasn’t outrageously priced, he still bought it for them.

        Unofficial Royalty just did bios on both women and list their charities. Bea has more than Eug does, which I found interesting.

        (Scroll down past the news and other various tidbits)

        http://www.unofficialroyalty.com

      • The Original Mia says:

        Shush, FLORC & LadySlippers, facts get in the way of the Ugly stepSisters mean-girling Cinderella story line.

      • FLORC says:

        LadySlippers
        I thought so, but couldn’t remember if Bea restricted herself to just a glass of wine with dinner. I do admire that trait to not drink or smoke in a person. Especially with those close to you that do drink and smoke. It can be tough to resist.

        And slightly off topic, but Bea’s bf is so handsome. Good family that is well off, but not over the top wealth. When are they getting married!?

        And again off topic with a rant, but I was binge watching Scandal and a comment was made.
        There’s no bigger Snob than new money.-Fitz
        Bea has never been that snobby and isn’t new money.
        And Olivia needs to drop Fitz. Jake is clearly more handsome and great.
        I’ve discussed this with friends and they’re all team Fitz, while my husband just looks back at me with glased eyes and agrees with me for the sake of it. More people I know need to watch this show.

      • ataylor says:

        @FLORC – I’m baffled people are still team Fitz. He’s a philandering, alcoholic, needy, insecure, aging-badly, verbally-emotionally abusive, egomaniac who can’t fathom that his former mistress actually found someone better to replace him with.

        I don’t understand it. I just can’t.

      • bluhare says:

        You don’t need to drink to take a lot of vacations. And Beatrice is photographed out and about at night all the time. Whether she drinks or not, I don’t know, but she hardly sits home knitting.

      • Megan says:

        Ummm, how many times have The Yorks been photographed at the Chiltern Firehouse? E is supposed to work in NY, but turns up at so many UK events like Royal Ascot and Wimbeldon on her $50,000 a year salary. And B has an unpaid internship, but somehow can afford all sorts of coture for all of the charity galas she attends.

      • Megan says:

        And let’s not forget the Yorks turn up at every wedding William and Kate attend. But only the Cambridges get criticized for attending weddings.

      • FLORC says:

        Agree ataylor.
        The writers clearly want there to still be a conflict of the heart with Olivia, but it’s not understandable. He dismisses her as he pleases and then claims to love her. She’s been so mistreated I’m just not buying anyone could want him at this point.
        And Jake is far more handsome;)

        Bluhare
        Because Bea is out often does that mean she’s partying? Not getting dinner or meeting up with friends to chat?
        I think the party aspect is meant to support the notion that Bea drinks and stays up late wearing herself out. It was said in a negative fashion.

        Megan
        That’s because the Cambridges or rather Kate will cancel work events, but clears her schedule for weddings and vacations. There isn’t a balance there. That’s where the criticism comes from. Not that she’s attending a wedding, but rather that she appears to prioritize social gatherings over work,

        Also, The Yorks run in the same circles and have the same friends. They also rarely miss work and still balance an ambitous charity schedule.
        Andrew is said to buy much for them, but they could be gifted those items also.
        And Eugenie’s job doesn’t reqquire heavy hours. She’s to generate interest and publicity and a portion of her job.

        You want to talk who’s suppose to be working and where they claim to be most of the time let’s talk William.

      • bluhare says:

        Hey FLORC, I agree she could be out at dinner with friends, but she goes to quite a few events, hence my point that she’s got a good social life she spends a lot of time at. I’ve never implied she drinks too much, as I don’t have a clue about that.

      • FLORC says:

        Bluhare
        Not you. The comment “constantly partying” read like a loaded statement that she parties often and indulges in partying activities like drinking.

        I wouldn’t expect anyone tostay at home. I think it’s fine she goes out. And if Kate went out with friends or anyone it wouldn’t be a big deal. As long as there was balance of work and play.
        I think going out shows a healthy social state and good connections.

    • Someonestolemyname says:

      I believe Beatrice did another charity visit this month, I cant recall details right now, but it was buried somewhere in royal news coverage.
      She does do charity work, its not covered by the wider press.

      Also as far as kiving off parents isn’t that what Kate has done her entire life?
      Kate went from living off her parents to living off of the Royals.

  16. Dena says:

    I’d probably be resentful too. Kate seems to have one get-out-of-jail free card after the other. The York sisters really aren’t required to do anything but exist yet they probably would like to or have looked forward to all the ribbon cutting ceremonies that Kate has blown off or refuses to do. After all, they grew up seeing the other members of their family do this type of “work” and probably assumed they’d do it too. So, in essence, they see something they want and would be good at wasted on Kate–who doesn’t seem to want it or care about it. That would breed resentment. Moreover, because Kate has no real status or gravitas on her own, she mostly doesn’t show up unless William does (or so it seems). It’s like having a light weight / lack wit or the bosses favorite promoted over you.

    ************
    Dave seems like a sponger himself. It has nothing to do with money. He might be the female equivalent of Kate. There is something about him that doesn’t sit right with me. I also thought it was reported that William introduced Dave to Beatrice.

    • ataylor says:

      Maybe it’s because he’s good friends with Ashton Kutcher? That might tarnish one’s reputation a bit IMHO.

    • Someonestolemyname says:

      I agree Dena.
      Also when Beatrice or Eugenie do charity work, which they do, it doesnt get covered. I think Beatrice just did some event this month for charity, it may have been a hospital charity of some kind, but the news was so limited it escapes me right now.

      Princess Beatrice does do charity work.

  17. joe spider says:

    More s**t-stirring by the tabloids?

    • Olenna says:

      Exactly. I don’t believe any of this sh*t and I doubt this young woman gives a flip about Kate or Pippa. Makes you wonder, though, who is really trying to stir the pot–the media or someone’s personal PR team.

    • LadySlippers says:

      •joe spider• •Olenna•

      Sh!t stirring AND creating more bad feelings for the entire York clan. It’s a win-win for the press.

      Everything I’ve ever read on the BRF (and it’s a lot) always praises how Andrew and Sarah parented Beatrice and Eugenie. The young women are often described as polite, sweet, respectful, dedicated, and hard-working — credits to their parents AND grandparents. Neither of the York princess’ particularly care for the lime-light but they deal with it with grace (one of them has openly stated they dislike the title princess and I think even said if she could — she’d do away with it). Sarah taught them to *always* be cheerful and smiley in public because of who they are/what they represent.

      I don’t believe this article and am very sad that so many people are believing it.

      • SecretlySurfing says:

        Totally. The press is missing it’s royal scandal heydays where papers flew off the shelves. They’re thirsting for gossip to rival that of the 90s.

      • Green Girl says:

        Yup, I think I’ve read that about both sisters, too. Say what you will about Andrew and Sarah (and you can say quite a bit), but they did do a great job of raising them.

        I can see that the sisters may not care for Kate, but I don’t think they’d let it show or let it be known beyond their most intimate circle of friends. It would be poor form to let your cousin – the future king of England, no less – know exactly what you think of his wife.

      • FLORC says:

        Green Girl
        Exactly so.
        I’m pretty much done with this thread.
        There’s nothing much to say here. There’s barely any truth here at all. And Bea and Eug have had their whole lives to understand who to keep close as friends. Also, if any of them would talk there would have been better gossip ages ago. So little of this rings untrue.

      • LadySlippers says:

        Don’t go •Florc•!!!!

        •SecretlySurfing• •Green Girl• •Florc•

        I think this is an instance where the tabloids are playing off the fact most people don’t know much about any of the Royals. And that most people will buy a cat-fight.

      • FLORC says:

        i’m back! Mostly because this thread didn’t get as terrible as I thought it would. And to respond to your unnoficialroyal link (which was great ty).

        Just wait until the Kate vs. Harry’s wife brawl. The 2 women will have never met and the tabs will claim their rivalry will end in a blaze of hellfire.

        Funny enough I can’t remember where I heard it, but Harry’s future wife better be warned. Kate’s stare is the stare of someone adept in giving matiasma/Evil eye.
        I laughed at that, but I also wear my charm in some form and have 1 pinned to my rosary above my bed.
        I think the portrait was used as reference.

      • Someonestolemyname says:

        Yup press wants to create some scandal so they use anything,

  18. Anniefannie says:

    Beatrice would be relegated to second class status no matter whom William selected as his bride!
    She should keep her royal-world gripes to herself as she sounds like a world class malcontent!

  19. Maum says:

    Maybe Beatrice badmouths Kate and doesn’t respect her because she’s seen the way Wills has treated her over the years?
    I’m sure it wasn’t just the press that was calling her Waity Katie.

    • Someonestolemyname says:

      Beatrice and Kate…Pippa and York sister’s bad blood goes way beack to the dating days, but I don’t really believe this current story, because IMO The Princesses would automatically know that whomever William married was going to get the Star Royal treatment by the press.

  20. Jem says:

    Beatrice’s eyes are too close together. Very distracting. I didn’t really read the article. Her face is like an abstract painting of a very pale man.

    • Siedhr says:

      Mean, but so funny and accurate!

    • FLORC says:

      Watch a video of Bea sometime at a charity event. The girl photographs horribly, but is quite pretty in person or rather in motion. MAny that have met her say this is such a shame because she has a sweet personality also. She just photographs poorly.

      • Feeshalori says:

        I saw a video of Beatrice leaving a restaurant, pausing to allow a photographer to take a picture, and she THANKED him. Lovely manners and Beatrice obviously knows how to deal graciously with the media. And Google Queen Victoria and anyone will see that Beatrice is the spitting image of the Queen in her young years.

      • FLORC says:

        Feeshalori
        She really shows a great deal of class when interacting with people. Even if inside she is annoyed, or bored, or sad you don’t let it show.
        And yea, spitting image. Those are some tough genes to get rid of. In time even George will submit to them.

      • Someonestolemyname says:

        I find Princess Beatrice to be beautiful.

      • FLORC says:

        Someone
        There’s so much to be said for how people are in person. Inner beauty accounts for so much.

    • bluhare says:

      I think she looks just like her dad in the photo above.

      • mayamae says:

        I’ve always thought Bea looked like Andrew and Eugenie was a ringer for Sarah. Eugenie doesn’t seem to have the vampyric teeth, at this point. Neither are photogenic, and I have the same problem. But what can you do?

  21. Talie says:

    I can see her having beef with Pippa more, who also overshadows her and can garner more attention even though she’s about as interesting as a dish rag.

  22. Hautie says:

    I have always seen this whole “Royalty” thing as nothing more than what it is. The ultimate tourist attraction for the UK. Their entire life as a public royal, is to be the face of “Royalty”. And sell it to tourist…. as something to come see while on vacation.

    If the Queen wanted the York sisters in a more public role. They would be. It has always been said that the Queen adores the sisters. And she should step up and do personal training with them while she can on her own events.

    So I am baffled why the York sisters are not given a decent PR office. And make them part of the attraction. I don’t see why they are not more of use. There are so many UK charities and causes that could use a little boost from a set of royal sisters. Whom I suspect would be a highlight to that bizarre family.

    It is obvious that the sisters are not shy. And have had a great deal of exposure to the Queen and that whole dedication to public life. Why not bring them onto the payroll. And boost the families image of being filled with great public servants.

    Then all this non sense about Kate will die down. Make those royal sisters a bigger part of the show… and make them earn their keep.

    • Lori says:

      I really do think it has a lot more to do with the Queen and Prince Philip’s hate for Sarah Ferguson.

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        I thought the Queen had a soft spot for Sarah? I’m not being argumentative, because I don’t consider myself a royal expert, but I thought I read that the Queen stilled liked her in spite of everything. No?

      • LadySlippers says:

        •GoodNames•

        QEII has always liked Sarah and still does. And Philip has never held it against either York princess that he does not get along with Sarah.

    • Bridget says:

      Because then the crown would have to pay for them. The royal family is huge, and Charles has long been rumored (or maybe stated publicly?) that he will drastically streamline the position of working royal, to just the direct line to the throne (including Harry) which would cut out Andrew and his family and many others.

      The York sisters have actually worked to improve the I public images over the years, most especially their appearances, but it’s possible that they will 1) never get over the embarrassing spectre of their parents many public gaffes, and 2) always suffer from the press’ s need to pit women against each other. But don’t forget, a PR person costs a lot of money, and the York family isn’t exactly a bunch of penny pinchers (hence Andrew’s hope that the girls could become working royals and receive an allowance). Make no mistake, these girls have grown up in incredible privilege and still have opportunities most of us could only dream of.

      • FLORC says:

        Even so far on this thread people are bringing up Sarah and Andrew and their faults. The York sisters will forever be burdened by the sins of their parents.
        Making fun of her physical features and her parents. That’s all they have to insult her with. You’d think if she was as awful as the article leads you to think someone would have more than that.

      • notasugarhere says:

        It reminds me of the people who go on and on about how hard working Carole Middleton is/was, and refuse to accept that Kate Middleton is plain lazy. Just because Andrew and Fergie were messes doesn’t mean Beatrice and Eugenie are.

      • FLORC says:

        True Nota.
        A pet peeve of mine is how people are prejudged by their parents. Accomplishments or faults those are all from the parents. They do not transfer to the children. Fergie and Andrew aer scandalous. Carole is a savvy business woman. That doesn’t make their children carbon copies that share in success they had little part of.

  23. Louise says:

    Kaiser is spot on about Airmiles Andy. He has a terrible reputation in the UK. As Kaiser mentions, they will always be tarnished with their parents’ shenanigans. The bottom line is people just aren’t interested in them. William and Harry are different because their mother is Princess Diana. That is in the mix, too. Where is Prince Edward these days? they are all “minor” royals. At the end of the day, none of them do a real job. It is trust fund central, a nice apartment in London and endless intern jobs. I would respect them more if they had a real job. Kate is a waste of time and bone idle. Sick of the eyeliner and she looks way older than she is. I dont mean to sound mean, but this does affect our judgement! Andy got this really wrong and has done them a disservice.

    • notasugarhere says:

      Where is Prince Edward these days? Working, just like his wife is.

      2013 royal engagement totals:
      Bill and Kate – combined total 106
      Edward and Sophie – combined total 573

      And remember, Edward and Sophie have two children to raise as well.

  24. Gia says:

    I don’t know if I believe any of this…but if it is true, I think it’s precious that a woman is complaining about Kate and Pippa being vacuous and pushy when she shows up to the royal wedding of the century wearing the worlds most obnoxious and attention seeking hat ever created. She may take many seats.

  25. Jackson says:

    Sounds like sour grapes because she didn’t pop out of the correct set of loins to get the spotlight shown on her. Oh well, chica.

  26. Siedhr says:

    Both York sisters are probably nice, pleasant women, privately. However, publicly, they’re both charisma blackholes. They look uncomfortable and aloof, whereas the Middleton sisters both have It. You may like them or not, they both catch the eye and hold it.

    • FLORC says:

      I urge you to watch them at charity visits. Most importantly their hospital visits. They spend hours and hours captivating crowds. And are shockingly well spoken and educated about their causes.

      As far as catching the eye. That isn’t always because or good qualities or appearances. Tabloid trainwrecks catch the eye and hold it as well. KK/Lilo, etc…

    • inthekitchen says:

      Oh, I strongly disagree that either Kate or Pippa have “it.” Both seem dull as dishwater, to me. And the only reason Kate holds my eye is because I’m waiting for her dress to fly up or for her to laugh hysterically at inappropriate times (Remembrance Day ceremonies, etc) or to see what gaffe she’ll make this time (can you test the smell by smelling it, etc).

      Diana had “it,” Tom Cruise (as loony as he is) has “it,” Marilyn Monroe had “it.” Kate and Pippa Middleton do not have “it” or charisma or whatever you want to call it, IMO.

    • Someonestolemyname says:

      Kate is so lackluster, I dont think she has “it” at all.

      That’s one reason the press has to make up stories like this, because on her own Kate is so dull.

  27. Dany says:

    That is just catfight-taboid stuff. Beatrice and Eugenie don´t want the big attention. Both prefer quiet lifes. The only time when Beatrice is happy about the spotlight is when she supports her charities. She´s really sweet when she visits schools 🙂
    And lets not forget that her boyfriend is a “commoner” too and if i remember well William was the one who introduced this guy to Beatrice.

    I remember all the bad articles about Beatrice´s weight when she was a teenager(!). She´s now thin and the paps still make fun of her looks. DailyMail and co publish only bad photos of her because people love to hate these girls. The comments are horrible and always about how ugly she is. DailyMail happily showed pictures of Beatrice trying to hide her hips and butt with a towel on vacation last year. They know they can hurt her when they highlight her problematic areas. That was the reason Bea lost all that weight years back when she was a teenie. Media bullying

  28. Jennifer says:

    Does she always look so surprised? Her eyes are practically popping out of her head.

    • LadySlippers says:

      •Jennifer•

      Ironically, those are Queen Victoria’s eyes.

      But the press tends to publish unflattering pics of all the Yorks, which is carryover from Sarah’s days married to Andrew. Editors admitted to having the same number of flattering/unflattering photos of Sarah and Diana but they choose to publish the flattering ones of Diana and the unflattering ones of Sarah. It created an ‘image’ that haunts Sarah today. It’s also true for all the Royals — the press creates an image and that’s what people believe…

      • Elle says:

        I also think the press is much more critical of girls than boys. It doesn’t help that Sarah is their mother, butthe press and public are much harsher on a girl’s appearance than a boy’s. Just look at Victoria in Sweden: she moved to the U.S. to get away from the media spotlight and recover from eating disorders. And she’s a lovely (not that it would be an excuse if she wasn’t)!

        It’s part of why I hope William and Kate have only boys. I can’t imagine the amount of attention a princess to the heir would get.

      • LadySlippers says:

        •Elle•

        Yup. And when the press is upset with one of the male Royals, it’s the female Royals that get thrown under the bus. Diana, Camilla, Sarah, Kate, Beatrice, and Eugenie are often criticised because people accept that it’s ‘her’ (usually the wife or mistress) fault. Or in Beatrice and Eugenie’s case — they get to ‘hurt’ Andrew by lying about his daughters….

        I honestly hope both William and Harry have only boys. It’s easier for everyone involved. Except their future significant others. 😢

      • FLORC says:

        Will be rought for any future daughters they might have just as it is. What makes it worse is it will be Diana’s 1st grand daughter! That alone will be horrible. They will build up this child the moment it’s born and come any awkward childhood moments tear that girl down. It’s practically already written.

    • Pepsi Presents...Coke says:

      Those big goggly blues go back to the Hanoverians, so we’re talking about a 312-year losing battle (I’ve heard that George I was part lemur). They’ve had options vis-a-vis phasing them out, but as we know, they have not historically been fans of ‘dilution’. They’re not Spanish Hapsburgs bad, but the idea of one’s mother also being his own third and fourth cousin is creepy, don’t pretend it’s not. Still, they have great peripheral vision. Yes, big eyes are all the rage with their DNA, even to the point where they reduce hemophilia to opening act status…

      …and the hemophilia is just seething over it.

      • What? says:

        LOL!!!
        I’m curous now, can I ask, what do you do for a living?

      • Pepsi Presents...Coke says:

        Hi, What?

        I’m a graduate musicology student/classical pianist, so, ‘High-Minded Hobo Shut-In’ seems like a fair assessment of what I do. I feel slightly embarrassed when I have to go into it with people when I get The Stare, which says how important and necessary I am. I just happen to really enjoy history and my eye is too jaundiced for my own good. Thanks for the interest, I’m glad I made you laugh. 😘

  29. Betti says:

    While i agree with the alleged comments about Kate being vaucous and pushy i can’t see the York sisters being jealous in any way of the Middletons – they are blood princess with a work ethic, something that Waity sadly lacks. Beatrice and Eugenie both come across as down to earth, normal people considering their parents and I like them.

    They at least WANT to work on behalf of Queen and Country, shame that the new Duchess doesn’t feel the same – she’d rather shop, lunch, shop, fake tan, shop, decorate, shop, vacation!

    As a British taxpayer i’d rather see my money being spent on a royal profile for the Yorks, rather than Waity’s clothes, ugly shoes, constant redecorating, fake tan, eye liner and numerous luxury holidays.

    • anne_000 says:

      @Betti +100

      I agree. I don’t see the York sisters as women who have nothing better to do than be jealous and obsess over the Middleton sisters. The York sisters seem to have fulfilling lives and to be more well-rounded than the M. sisters.

      I think Prince Charles is being selfish and short-sighted by focusing only on his line as being relevant. Sorry, Charlie, but your William is a dud, his wife is worse, and her family is embarrassing. Your only other asset is Harry, though some say he gets sacrificed from time to time to make William look good. If Charles wants younger people of the public to stay interested in the Royal family for decades to come, he needs more than just Harry and himself. I think it would be a good idea for him to bring more attention on the ‘Royal works’ done by the younger generation: Edward, Sophie (though I don’t like her), and the York sisters.

      • janefr says:

        + let’s not forget that Elisabeth doesn’t come from the ‘straight to the throne’ line. Her father line was not supposed to become King. Through death and abdication, kingdoms have been passed more than once to a secondary line. Sometime more deserving ( Edouard VIII vs Georges VI and Elisabeth II,…)

      • LadySlippers says:

        •janefr•

        Most think Lilibet (QEII family name) would have been Queen anyway — just 20 years later. David (what everyone called Edward VIII) failed to knock-up a single mistress (and he had plenty!) and that is quite unusual.

    • Elle says:

      anne_000 and Betti: Agree!!! (Also, anne, your second paragraph cracked me up)

      It’d be hard to be born into that family and be shoved out. The thing I don’t understand is: why not a compromise? I get that people aren’t crazy about their parents, but it seems like Beatrice and Eugenie could do a lot of good. More than that, they want to help. Does Charles not realize that a streamed lined monarchy means everyone having to do more work? Is the rest of Harry’s life going to be 16 hours a day of appearances and volunteer work, since his brother and sister-in-law won’t pick up the slack?

    • LadySlippers says:

      •Betti• •anne__000• •Elle•

      Something that Penny Junor said in her most recent Royal book (about Harry) was two-fold.

      1) The BRF is facing a challenge they’ve never encountered before — three full generations of working Royals. And they cannot afford it.

      –> QEII/Philip, Richard/Birgitte (Gloucester), Edward/Katie (Kent although the Dss rarely does Royal engagements anymore with full approval of HM), Michael/Marie-Christine (Kent), and Alexandra (Kent)
      {Richard, Edward, Michael, and Alexandra are all 1st cousins of HM}

      –> Charles/Camilla, Anne, Andrew, Edward/Sophie
      {none of their 1st cousins are working Royals}

      –> William/Kate, and Harry with Beatrice and Eugenie pitching in to do an odd engagement here and there

      So that’s 17(ish) working Royals and they are scrambling to find ways to pay for them all. Hence all the budget cuts. And the senior Royals really work a lot. Anne, for example, is down in Africa right now after just coming from Australia. And Anne and Charles kind of ‘compete’ to see who ends up with the most engagements per year (it varies but they usually are at or around the 600 mark).

      2) Another thing Junor stated, which runs contrary to what we’ve been told, is Beatrice and Eugenie don’t actually *want* to be working Royals. She claims they want a fairly normal (and boring) life. I don’t know how true it is but it’s interesting to think about.

      • Elle says:

        That’s interesting – I hope for Beatrice and Eugenie’s sake that’s true that they don’t want the royal life. It’s a shame Andrew and Sarah didn’t prepare them the way that Anne seems to have done with her children. Both of her children seem to have found a way to live a public / private life.

        I agree that right now the BRF has a full plate, but as the oldest generation dies off, I can’t help but wonder if Charles’s streamline plan will truly pay off. He and his siblings do an impressive amount of work, and I can see Anne following in her parents’ footsteps and not “retiring,” as it were. While Harry seems to be following in his father’s footsteps, even if Kate and Will do step up their schedules, I have a hard time believing they’ll ever come close to Charles or Anne.

      • LadySlippers says:

        •Elle•

        Anne’s children were ‘helped’ by not having *any* titles (Anne’s then husband Mark declined any title as did both Peter and Zara when they both married) and being further down the line. But I DO think both Bea and Eug have blended their public and private lives nicely. What makes you think otherwise?

        As for Charles. I understand his concern but don’t agree with his execution. I think both the Yorks and the Wessexes could be invaluable to the Monarchy.

        I agree, William, at the very least *appears* work shy and I struggle to see him get 600 engagements in a year. Mind you, both he and Harry have stated numerous times they want to be more than just on the letterhead — which I absolutely respect and admire. However, you can see what a huge impact Harry has made on a few of his chosen charities and I’ve not seen that type of impact on William’s charities.

      • Elle says:

        It’s not but my own limited view of the BRF, but I do feel like Zara and Peter had more concrete life goals re: jobs, etc., than the York princesses. There’s nothing wrong with that – Lord knows I had no idea what I wanted to do when I was their age – but they seem more adrift than their elder cousins.

        I agree about the Yorks and the Wessexes. In particular, Sophie – despite the occasional misstep – seems like she’s been good for the monarchy. She gave them some needed spousal stability after the ’90s and seems to be pretty good at balancing the combination of work and public image.

        I’m incredibly impressed by Harry and the work he’s done. I’d like to think that, if I were born into that sort of privilege, I’d have his commitment and passion to charities and finding ways to make a difference. I frankly could care less what he does on his off time: he puts in his time, so go have fun.

        The one downside of all Harry’s work is it does highlight how little William and Kate do and how much they seem to dislike it. What gets me is I don’t think they’d have to expend that much more effort on the charity and ribbon-cutting front to get a pass for all of the vacations, renovations, etc.

    • Someonestolemyname says:

      +1

      • Pippa Mids says:

        Lady ELle
        +1B great points.

        Yes. PC wanted. To down size but I see a lot of push back – maybe HMs, PA and PAnne. The BRF monachy will not survive with just POW, P Harry hardwork, and a lazy workless Willy and Waity- taking all the privileges and luxury and giving npthing back!

        PC better wakeup and use all the family including P Michael Kent to help he and P Harry. With waity and ma moddleton. with PGTips, we can expect another workless doolittle prince.

  30. jane16 says:

    This reminds me of how we would hear the royals were always carping about Diana, finding fault with her clothing allowance and her popularity, etc.

  31. RobN says:

    If Sarah Ferguson was my mother, I don’t think I’d complain about anybody being vacuous and pushy. Glass castles, and all.

    • LadySlippers says:

      •RobN•

      Both of Sarah’s daughters cite their mother as a role model. So for all Sarah’s faults (Andrew’s too) she is very well known to be a fantastic mother.

      • RobN says:

        She is also vacuous and pushy. Going public about how awful it was not to be invited to the Royal wedding had to have been completely uncomfortable for both girls. The fact that they support her publicly is not too surprising; it doesn’t mean they don’t privately wish she’d stop selling her connections for money and yakking to the tabloids.

  32. Katenotkatie says:

    Oh no, not mischievous tittle-tattle!

  33. someone says:

    If I lived in England I wouldn’t bother to go to an event simply because Beatrice or Eugenie were cutting a ribbon there. However, I would if Kate and/or William was. The Yorks just aren’t going to pull people in. Unfortunately, the fact that the Yorks are willing to do the job doesn’t make the public want to see them.

    • Someonestolemyname says:

      William and Kate are both rather lackluster on their own, ,which is why I think the press has to create these silly stories.

  34. The Other Katherine says:

    They don’t come much more common than Beatrice’s mum, which is one of many reasons why I think this rift (at least as positioned here) is mostly tabloid creativity.

  35. Murphy says:

    This is just blown up speculation.
    I wish Charles would let Beatrice work, she is far better at it than Kate.

    Also, where is that engagement already? I’ve been waiting for years!

    • Someonestolemyname says:

      Beatrice does do charity work, its just not official. She did a charity visit of some kind just days ago, it gets buried in the press.

      I’ve wondered if Beatrice is holding off the engagement?

      If Beatrice was concerned about Royal status, I wonder would sheconsider pursuing a Prince or Aristo in some European or British family? There must be some aristo and royal men her age.

      Why do Royals avoid marrying each other like the plague? I’m just curious?

  36. manjit says:

    Ha ha ha ha, Fergie’s daughter thinks Kate’s a “commoner”. Ha ha ha ha.
    Kate’s the mother of the future King and Beatrice works for Sony, ha ha ha ha.
    The daughter of two of the biggest freeloaders in the history of freeloading thinks Kate and Pippa Middleton are “pushy”, ha ha ha ha.
    This story is hilarious!!!!!!! The irony almost eats itself.

  37. OrangeBlohan says:

    Does anybody want to tell Beatrice that her mother is a toe-sucking “commoner” who wanted to charge admittance for people to visit Andrew?

    • bluhare says:

      Technically, she’s a toe-suckee. 🙂

    • Flower says:

      Beatrice her self is ‘a commoner’ as was Diana, as is Harry. Everyone who doesn’t have a title of their own is strictly speaking ‘a commoner’…… and Beatrice very well knows this , so it is something she would never ever say which points to the entire article being made up by some magazine minion .

      Even William despite being heir to the throne was ‘a commoner’ until the Queen made him a Duke. Prince and princess are only courtesy titles , not a title held in their own right. Legally in British law ‘a commoner’ is any person who may not sit in the ‘House of Lords'(reserved for someone with their own title), anyone else may only (if elected) sit in the ‘House of Commons’. hence the term ‘commoner’

    • Someonestolemyname says:

      Sarah may have been a commoner but she was Diana’s cousin and descended from Kings. Sarah’s common and pushy yes, but she was / is part of the Aristocracy and grew up playing with Andrew, the royal family knew Sarah through her family lineage , her father’s job as Charle’s Polo manger and her mother was from a titled,society family.
      It’s sad to see how Sarah ruined thing for herself, because she and Andrew were quite happy at one point.

      Sarah sadly went off the rails and ruined things. Unlike Kate she couldnt occupy her time with just shopping whe left alone for weeks at a time, she looked to flirtations with others. She didn’t have great common sense.

  38. Vava says:

    Seems like a media fodder story, IMO. I doubt any of them make much of an issue with each other.

    Who would I want to share a meal with in the BRF? The Queen and Prince Philip. They’ve had very interesting lives indeed! They work, they have stories. Bring it on. I wouldn’t mind having lunch with Charles and Camilla, either. These young royals though, they just haven’t done much. Perhaps their day will come.

  39. Leni says:

    First I would hope that they would not have such bad manners but secondly I seriously think they would be careful about that particular term because it has been used many times to describe their own mother.

  40. Flower says:

    A lot of comments on a totally bogus story cobbled together from a few facts pre wedding. I don’t believe for one moment this story is accurate, most of it is made up tripe, Women’s Day used to be a good women’s magazine but has descended into a tabloid gossip rag over the past decade, not much better than In Touch.

    Not that I believe the Yorkies and Middletons are besties but this story has simply been made up to generate sales. Charles wishes it could be a streamlined Royal Firm, but he shouldn’t hold his breath waiting for Wills and Kate to do the job. Which just leaves him , Camilla and Harry to carry out over 4,000 engagements a year if they worked only with the pared down team.

    Anne and Sophie (Edwards Wife) are actually the major work horses after Charles now that the Queen and Phillip are winding down, every week they carry out 4 to 12 engagements each with very little, if any publicity. Kate and Wills are lucky to do one a month.

  41. duchesschicana says:

    I’m late in the game, but I’ll add my thoughts:

    Well, that article doesn’t make sense to me, merely a fabrication by the press that Bea is supposedly jealous of kate. For one, Kate barely does events, she not known as heavy weight for events. How can one possibly be jealous of someone whom most of the time isn’t there? The thing is they both do events that have do with ribbon cutting and glamour , just one does it officially and the other doesn’t.

    Ironic since the one who has more patronages and does more charity work is Bea. Sure, kate has more attention, but seeing how she gets her attention really ain’t nothing to brag about. They may not be best friends, but I think they get along, exchange some pleasantries that’s about it . I seen them in pics talking amicably .

    So, even if there was a feud in the beginning, ( which could have happened. I used think so, not so sure anymore,) I think it has been done with and dealt with. This is just the media playing mean girls, on a slow news day, when in reality I don’t think kate and Bea give each other very much thought at the end of the day as you know they do have lives.

  42. Sal says:

    As an Australian, I can tell you that Woman’s Day is like Star magazine. Ie, full of bs.

    • notasugarhere says:

      This same magazine said a month ago that Queen Margrethe was planning on handing the throne over to her “beloved daughter-in-law” any day now. Funny, I thought the throne went to the heir, Frederik. That is how low-quality Woman’s Day’s royal reporting is.

  43. notasugarhere says:

    Latest (unconfirmed) twitter rumor: Bill, Kate, and PGTips on a plane to Scotland on the 26th. Too sick to work (declined attending art gallery event and cited morning sickness as the reason) but healthy enough to fly to Scotland?

    • Someonestolemyname says:

      As always….those two do as they please and the press will never call them on their crap.