Jamie Dornan says there will be no ‘todger’ in ‘Fifty Shades of Grey’

FFN_Dornan_Jamie_JKING_101314_51557267

The more I think about it, the more worried I am about Jamie Dornan’s career post-Fifty Shade of Grey. He’s got a great gig on The Fall and I worry that Fifty Shades is going to be financially successfully but a critical disaster, so much so that Jamie will be forever associated with this one crappy role as Christian Grey. I think Jamie is worried about it too, but he’s just trying to be Zen about the whole thing. Maybe it will work out. Fingers crossed. Jamie has a new interview with The Observer about The Fall & Fifty Shadesyou can read the whole interview here. I enjoyed it, but I enjoy him in general. He’s neurotic and charming. He also says that there’s no “todger” in Fifty Shades. Ugh!

Whether he felt objectified during his modeling days: “At times, yeah; on the whole, no. I got lucky with that gig because quite early on I could be picky about what I did, where I did it. And because I was on contracts, I was working maybe 10 days a year and getting paid really well for it.” He says “working”. Actually what he had to do most of the time was “lean against a wall while looking depressed”.

Growing up good-looking: “I didn’t do particularly well with girls at school. I was always very young- looking. And my sister’s friends would always say: ‘You’re so cute.’ I f–king hated that. If you are a skinny, baby-faced teenager, the last thing you want to hear is that you’re cute.”

Why he loves his beard: “I feel uncomfortable without it. I find myself moving differently. I don’t like myself without a beard.”

He loves The Fall: “I’ve always got The Fall,” he says as if to reassure himself. “No matter what happens in my career, I’ve always got The Fall.”

Playing Christian Grey: “I am never going to please all 100 million people who read the book,” he says. “I’ll be lucky if half that number are happy with me playing Christian Grey. I know there are campaigns of hate against me already. Yeah, there is a huge intellectual snobbery about the book. And it comes from all the papers that I like to read. The Guardian is my home page on my laptop, and the other day I logged on innocently and there they were having a massive go at the trailer for Fifty Shades and I was thinking: ‘F–k, this is not good.’ But what can I do? I understand why those kinds of papers would have preconceived ideas about what it is.”

Why he never read the book: “Nope. Because we are the types of people who have the Guardian as our home page. Look, the film is not the book. It’s an adaptation, and Sam Taylor-Johnson is an artist as well as an award-winning film director. Look at her track record. And look at the film studios behind it. Universal. Focus. All I can say is, wait until you see it before passing judgment.”

How graphic is the film? “You want to appeal to as wide an audience as possible without grossing them out. You don’t want to make something gratuitous, and ugly, and graphic… Sam is a very bright woman, so there might be some suggestive elements to it, but I haven’t seen it at this stage, so it is hard for me to say. I’m aware of what we shot, and it wasn’t as if we shot a film without any action.”

His todger? “There were contracts in place that said that viewers wouldn’t be seeing my, um…” Todger? He laughs. “Yeah, my todger.”

He’s a feminist & he doesn’t think the film is about violence against women: “I think it’s very hard to argue that when it is all consensual. Half the book is about making contracts. Permission and agreement that this be done. There’s no rape, no forced sexual situations.”

[From The Guardian]

There’s a ton of stuff about growing up in Northern Ireland and still having “mates” from his youth and what they think of their friend from Belfast being considered some kind of sex god. He seems remarkably well-adjusted, honestly. I already believed that the producers would probably not want Jamie to do any kind of Michael Fassbender-like nudity, but I bet Dakota has to show almost everything. Which pisses me off. If there was ever a film for equal-opportunity nudity, it would be Fifty Shades of Grey.

FFN_Dornan_Jamie_JKING_101314_51557503

Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

29 Responses to “Jamie Dornan says there will be no ‘todger’ in ‘Fifty Shades of Grey’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. PunkyMomma says:

    Considering the buzz regarding the lack of chemistry between Jamie and Dakota, no need to view the noodle here. . .

  2. Jaderu says:

    He said the word “intellectual” while talking about 50 shades of grey. He made a funny.

    • Felice says:

      He means that people call out the book on its grammar, style, and inaccurate portrayal of BDSM.

    • zena says:

      He did make a funny, didn’t he? He’s so clueless as to what he’s doing. How has he never read the book? Intellectual snobbery? What the hell is he talking about? I’m embarrassed for him. I despised FSOG and if that makes me an intellectual snob then so be it. By the way, Jamie Dornan, don’t use words like ‘grotesque’ and ‘ugly’ to describe anything related to your crap film.

  3. Abbott says:

    I think he’ll be fine post-50; Dakota on the other hand…

    Kinda disappointed that Ben Affleck’s bologna pony is the only peen cameo we get for the next 12 months.

  4. Kiddo says:

    ‘He’s so cute’ going on about this.

  5. Allie says:

    I think he’ll be fine after this. I may be biased though, because I think he’s the dreamiest man in Hollywood right now.

  6. QQ says:

    No we will just have to deal with the Turd of a message that the movie serves us, that too is contractual

  7. Sam says:

    I hate the cop-out “this is not the book.” BS. The book sold a bajillion copies. The people who read the book will be the massive audience for the movie, along with a few curious gawkers and hate-watchers. You’re bringing the book to life. You gotta do the book or just don’t bother with it. This whole interview felt like a long-winded attempt to justify not going all the way into the book’s more, uh, “uncomfortable” material (and yes, I hope you know to what I refer).

    • Size Does Matter says:

      Do you mean that in the book he wants to have sex in a very uncomfortable place?

      Like the backseat of a Volkswagon?

      • Sam says:

        I was thinking about the scene where Christian helps Ana, uh, extract her tampon. I cannot imagine that in any way playing well on screen. I cringed reading that part alone. Maybe for a horror flick, but this is allegedly “romance.”

  8. Mia4S says:

    That comment about not reading the book?! That’s awesome. Read between the lines. We “have the guardian as our home page?” = we consider ourselves too smart and deep to lower ourselves to read that garbage. I’m in this because the director is an artist! Interpretation! Art!

    The PR trail for this will be hilarious. Hey people stupid enough to read this garbage! Come watch our “interpretation” in which we apparently have no chemistry!

    And people will.

    • tina says:

      My friends and I completely agree with you, Mia. That’s exactly what he’s saying. The thing is his comments will go over many people’s heads. Another thing, if he’s never read the book how can he talk about the sexual abuse being non-existent? Jamie, please stop talking. Please. Look pretty and that’s it. And stop telling people this is art. Nobody cares.

      • millarca21 says:

        I think his comments:
        “I think it’s very hard to argue that when it is all consensual. Half the book is about making contracts. Permission and agreement that this be done. There’s no rape, no forced sexual situations.”
        make it clear he is either clueless about the books or is being willfully blind to aspects such as that Ana never actually enters into a contract, and that Christian does what he wants regardless of her wishes and coerces her into allowing him to do things she’s stated she does not want to do.

        And how on earth can seeing his todger be gratuitious in a movie that’s all about sex? I bet Dakota was required to reveal all.

    • joe spider says:

      Funny i thought he was in it for the $$

  9. GoodNamesAllTaken says:

    I can get what a todger is from the context, but this is a new word. From whence doth it cometh?

  10. Jodie says:

    Weird, since he has nude modeling pictures out there already. Decent length, not all that girthy, uncut, for those of you who are curious lol.

  11. Faithmobile says:

    The OED says 1950’s slang, no etymology.

  12. Rawr says:

    Women are stuffed in tight revealing clothes in practically 99% of movies. I want hot men in g strings and “todgers” all over the place. I will not stand for this buffoonery!

  13. Emily C. says:

    NOTHING in the book is consensual. We do NOT make “contracts” in BDSM. Any man who asks you to sign a written contract and claims this is what BDSM is about is planning to abuse you. We have safe words, not “contracts”. You want out of a relationship, or you want to stop doing something? “I want out of this relationship/no longer want to do this thing.” No different from any other kind of sexual relationship. The relationship in 50 Shades is pure abuse, nothing more nor less, and the lie that it’s BDSM is hurting people.

  14. genevieve says:

    I wonder if he has an artful todger.

    Ba-dum tish!

  15. captain hero says:

    Even Jamie dornan’s todger is too embarrassed to be seen in this movie

  16. Tig says:

    Why does any successful model-esp male-ever quit? Reading his description of his modeling career sounds amazing- $$$ for looking depressed-LOL! I never understood why they made him be clean shaven in the movie- scruff, esp on him, is good! I think his career will be fine, and while I get he’s going to say good things about his director, still glad to see it. Quite frankly, that to me is the interesting twist- a female director.

  17. Good Cheer says:

    @Tig I quite agree