Jennifer Aniston covers Bazaar, hustles for an Oscar & promotes Justin Theroux

aniston1

Jennifer Aniston covers the December issue of Harper’s Bazaar. Finally, a decent cover subject. No disrespect to Allison Williams and Anna Kendrick, but I have no idea why they are noteworthy enough for December magazine covers. We like to complain about Aniston’s PR machinations, but can we all agree that she’s deserving of a major magazine cover? Especially when she’s actively hustling for that Oscar nomination. HA. Anyway, this was a really good read – she doesn’t shy away from talking about tabloid rumors, Justin Theroux, etc. You can read the full interview here. Some highlights:

She loves home renovation projects: “It’s what I love to do,” she says. “It’s a great outlet for me, a hobby, if you will.” The next plan is to renovate Theroux’s apartment in downtown Manhattan. “I’ve got to get my hands on something because I can’t sit still.” She adds with a verbal wink,”I mean, I haven’t done anything since June, for Chrissake.”

The tabloid narrative (which she helped create): “I think people are starting to feel like, Are we that stupid?… Seriously. How many times can I be out there in the world, enjoying my life, and yet the narrative is ‘Poor, Sorry, Sad in Love Jen’ … whatever the stupid headline is.” Aniston, frankly, doesn’t “give a sh-t.” She pauses. “It’s the detachment from it. There was a part of me that used to get very upset. I was guilty of getting too up in arms about stuff that wasn’t real, phantom boxing with something that’s not even there. Now I’d rather just focus on people and things that are here, happening, and what’s yet to come. My friends, my family, wonderful people I work with. We know what the real is.”

The idea that she would do rom-coms forever: “Ha! That sounds like a terribly boring existence. I love doing comedies, though. It takes skill to bring that joy.”

Wanting to “punch” someone: “Ah, there are some people I would punch. I’d do that to a paparazzo probably.”

But she’s “a forgiving person”: “I absolutely am. I think it’s extremely important to forgive. Otherwise it just builds up like toxic waste. There’s nothing worse than holding a grudge. Listen, people can do unforgivable things, but you have to let it go and say, ‘Look, we’re all human beings. We make mistakes.’ To hold any kind of resentment is like taking rat poison and waiting for the rat to die.”

Who is her creative crush? “Justin Theroux. Not only is he a great actor but he’s one of the best comedy writers out there. And he directs and paints murals. And I just think it’s so attractive to be that good at so many things and to have no ego. He’s one of the most humble, decent human beings. He’s not an ass. He’s not like some of our friends who are young and up-and-coming and they hit celebrity, and all of a sudden you’re like, ‘Oh! You’re different. Now you don’t say hi to people?’ ”

She’s never bored with Justin: “It’s almost impossible to get bored with one another. We’ve tried so hard! And even that’s interesting because his eyes are so pretty, but we can entertain ourselves and talk about endless things, which is pretty great.”

Justin doesn’t mind being with The Jennifer Aniston: “He’s just been doing it so graciously and gracefully, and it’s a strange ballpark to walk into. He’s in his body, for sure. He’s a pretty realized person. But he’s been doing this for 20 years.”

On her 40s: “When am I supposed to freak out? When am I supposed to feel like, ‘Oh, my knee! Oh, ouch!’ I don’t feel any of those things! I feel like our aging marker needs to be rejiggered. I heard Halle Berry refer to her pregnancy at 47 as a ‘geriatric pregnancy,’ which is ridiculous! It’s insulting. Obviously, as women we’ve evolved. My eyesight is sh-t, though. I already was nearsighted, but now I can’t see anything.”

Her pre-Theroux life: “It really helped me get to a place where I was more comfortable with myself, truly ready for love and for a partner. The past wasn’t ‘less than.’ It was extremely important to my growth as a woman. But if you take the law of attraction, if you only love yourself 70 percent, that’s what’s going to come back to you. So you fill up that 30 percent, then all of a sudden there’s this pure, good love standing right in front of you. Then you realize, ‘Oh, this can be easy! It doesn’t have to be so hard.’ ”

Her amethyst earrings: “These are Ted Muehling that my sweetheart got me.” Theroux, he of the storied motorbike and leather, has great taste. “He can buy me jeans! I’ve never had a man be able to buy me jeans.” Theroux’s urbanity plus Aniston’s sunniness equals “ebony and ivory, or tawny and ebony! That’s another song altogether.”

[From Harper’s Bazaar]

There are actually way more interesting/noteworthy quotes in there, but I was running out of space and the whole interview is worth a read. She keeps bringing the conversation back to Cake and how it’s “the most challenging part I’ve ever done” and how “horrific” it was to go outside without makeup, wearing prosthetic scars. As for all of the Justin stuff… it sounds like she’s promoting her relationship just as much as she’s promoting Cake! No, clearly she adores him. But I have my doubts about what he feels for her. And I think it’s fascinating (!!!) that she wants to renovate his NYC apartment. That’s the same apartment he shared with Heidi Bivens. That’s the same apartment he’s called home for much of the past year and a half.

aniston2

Photos courtesy of Harper’s Bazaar.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

146 Responses to “Jennifer Aniston covers Bazaar, hustles for an Oscar & promotes Justin Theroux”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. don't kill me i'm french says:

    OMG an interesting interview by Jennifer Aniston!

  2. Charlie says:

    Angelina Jolie is so so much better. Just to get it started.

    I found Jen very annoying in this interview. She reminds me of Aaron Paul with the annoying gushing over her boyfriend. And yuck on reffering to Justin as her sweetheart. What is she, 12?

    • Candy Love says:

      Please don’t .

      • Luciana says:

        It bothers me that people continue to perpetuate the never ending fight between Angelina Jolie and Jen Aniston. Two different women with different careers who happened to be married to the same guy.

        I bet both of them are sick and tired about these stories. It’s more fanfiction than anything and please, don’t begin with Chelsea Handler on whatever her name is, an alcoholic who cannot keep her mouth shut.

        I might be in the minority here but I like Jen and Angie.

      • Charlie says:

        I like them both too, Luciana. But just look down and you’ll see Angelina being brought up again. This was more of a tongue-in-cheek comment.

  3. Hawkeye says:

    The tabloid narrative has given her a relevance she would otherwise never have.

  4. Rachel says:

    She’s really hustling for an Oscar nom that’s just not going to happen.

    • Charlie says:

      It’s a normal annoying interview, she isn’t doing anything most actors don’t. At least she didn’t get engaged to start off her campaign.

      • pookah says:

        I always think you Aniston cheerleaders are referencing Brad Pitt or Angelina, and you usually are because…yeah, you’ll never be over it. Get it straight dear, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie have no rivals, but if they did, it might be a couple like Sean Penn and Charlize Theron (they have a good pedigree if not wide box office appeal like Brange). Aniston and Theroux can’t even rival Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick or Ben Stiller and that Marcia Brady actress he’s married to.

        Charlie girl, you do know both Brad and Angelina have been near staples during award seasons for the past decade, because they actually get nominated for reputable awards in films by critics and their peers (not bought and paid for by PR agent People’s Cheese awards, Spikes, or MTV ‘dirtbag’ awards) – in fact Brad started his red carpet run from almost the moment he split with Aniston (telling).

        I recall he and Angie attending the Golden Globes because he was nominated that year for Best Supporting Actor in Babel….the next few years were both of them trading off award nominations between kids….so yeah, you sound demented to suggest that they’d wait 10 years to get engaged, just to get additional noms during award season to add to their mountain of others. News bulletin: BOTH are already Oscar winners, and they’ve been feted and nom’d many many times since they”ve been together- it makes no diff whether they were partnered, engaged or married.

        If they were as cynical as you suggest, and thought a wedding ceremony would ensure a nod, why wouldn’t they have married 9 years ago??

        Use your head dear. But most of all, get another marginally talented celebrity couple composed of a tv sitcom star and a D lister to compare Aniston and Ted Bundy too. Maybe Sofia Vergara and that true blood dude she’s dating?!

      • Charlie says:

        I meant Cumberbatch. And it was a joke, calm down.
        I was 12 when Brad and Jennifer got divorced so I’m really not invested in them. It just annonys me how completely black and white the reporting on the 3 of them is. I haven’t been reading this site for a long time, so I don’t remember a time when Angelina got any hate.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        @Charlie
        It was in the 2006-2011 era that Angelina got a ton of hate on this site. And not just ‘oh, I don’t like her, she’s anorexic, she can’t act, etc’, it was ‘she’s a wh-re’, her name is ‘skankelina’, there were racist comments about her kids…….and it didn’t matter what the topic was about. It didn’t really stop until Jennifer and Justin got together—then there were actual discussions about them, not just ‘OMFG she’s a fat lipped, skanky homewrecker!’…..which I like better.

        *I know you’re probably not very interested, but just clarifying it for you. Some of the long time posters get a little ‘terse’ when people start using the term ‘hate’……

      • Esmom says:

        pookah, I’m not sure what that heck Aniston ever did to you for you to spend so much time and energy and words trashing her up and down any thread related to her. Wow.

      • Esmom says:

        OK, pookah, thanks for the dissertation. I’m well aware of the site’s name and purpose and despite that I consistently see an inordinate amount of hate on JA threads. Reminds me why I once vowed not to click on another one…I think I’ll take my own advice. Over and out.

      • mayamae says:

        @pookah, what a nasty and condescending comment. Snark on the celebrity as much as you want, but you went after the poster. I notice you never returned to apologize for your assumption. You know what happens when you assume “dear” ….

        @Virgilia, what you say is accurate, but what are the posters who started frequenting this site after 2011 supposed to do? One innocent comment is all it takes to bring down the wrath of God. Then when you defend yourself, you’re told how every other site on the face of the earth is issuing death threats on the JPs, and this is the only bastion of sanity for every JP fan in the world.

        It leaves absolutely no gray area. The world is very gray. There is absolutely no tolerance for those who like both women. Or those who like Angelina but not Brad, or vice versa. There’s no room for those who don’t like her as an actor, but love her as a humanitarian. I am someone who went from being a bit neutral on her, and then started loving her when Maddox came along. I like Brad. I really like the two of them together. YET, I have been slapped down so many times and called everything – including a racist, which absolutely kills my liberal heart. All because I don’t hate Jennifer and don’t think she’s the cause of all evil in the world. When it comes to the JPs, it’s become a fan site where only hearts, unicorns, and crowns are welcomed.

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        @Mayamae …

        Aren’t you ‘assuming’ certain things as well? I’ve never read any comments here by any poster suggesting or demanding people ‘hate’ Jennifer Aniston and love the Jolie-Pitts. You admit to not having not been around for the gleeful roast of the Villainess Angelina Jolie, yet you’ve ‘assumed’ this site is full of Jennifer Aniston haters with no tolerance for ‘gray’ areas.

        Again (as others have said), you have NO idea what hate is until you’ve read some of the comments posted here about Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt, ‘and’ their children. All of which go way beyond the ‘I don’t like her hair, She does look good in that dress, Her PR Team manipulates the press,’ and are archived for your review. None of the comments made about Jennifer Aniston and her fiancee–which aren’t really any different from comments made about any other celebrity at this website–even come close to the level of vile hatred leveled at, and the lies invented about, the Jolie-Pitts and their family.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        @mayame
        I’m not saying anyone needs to do anything, apologize for anything, feel bad about what other fans said–all my comment was meant to do was to explain to Charlie why some posters get a little tetchy about the word ‘hate’. Because I’ve been reading this site since late 2010–and beyond someone on the downthread calling Jennifer a skank (first time I’ve ever read anything like that), the meanest name I’ve heard people call Jennifer is crap like Maniston, etc–and so when people complain about other posters hating Jennifer (and really hating her, not just being a h8ter), then I can understand why the long time posters get pissed off. Because it was really only up until Jennifer and Justin had their Uncle Terry relationship roll out (not even making it up–I remember the whole thing very well) that the really mean posters began to leave (the ones who said the skankelina crap)….and there was more discussion.

        I know people say these threads get heated and ugly–well, not that ugly.

    • Sunny says:

      She looks gorgeous.

      I like that she is shameless in her pursuit of an Oscar nod. Hollywood generally does require a lot of hustle and selling yourself to be successful. I much prefer this desperate hustle to the faux, “I’m not even thinking about Oscar, this part was just so well-written and it moved me” bullshit narrative.

      That being said, I doubt she will get a nomination. She is not an actress with a lot of range and I think there should be enough work of formidable other actresses to fill that category come award season time.

      I think the interview also makes clear that she still adores Justin but I have never been of the belief that he is all that into her.

      • julia says:

        Desperation does not look good when no one but your PR team is pushing a performance. Why at her age is she do desperate? She has her millions and stripper roles no one else wants, I would think that is enough.
        She should have let it happen naturally, not push it so much. Sandra was never desperate, her nomination happened without desperate hustle.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        I don’t think either of them are all that into each other. What’s interesting is that Jennifer is a kind of female Leo (Dicaprio). She doesn’t pick boytoys, but it seems to like she puts her friends first over her relationships. Whenever she’s not working, she’s in LA. Where the majority of her friends are. She’s the one who coined the term ‘goddess circle’–that’s not made up……

        Justin’s show has been renewed for a second season–but there is no filming date. How often has he been in LA since June? By my count (as I looked at one of his fansites that have pap pics), three times–he was in LA for the Cake wrap party/premiere, there are pictures of him biking in Beverly Hills for a few days in October, and he came back for the Governor’s Awards……

        Both of them could spend a whole lot more time together—in fact, Justin could’ve came down to LA to stay. But from the pap pics I’ve seen, he comes down a few days a month, and then goes straight back to LA (and these are pics just from September).

      • Maggi says:

        I love the white jumpsuit thing she’s wearing on the cover. I’m not an expert on plastic surgery but her face looks pumped full of fillers.

    • Greata says:

      @Pookah…you are 100% accurate in all your observations about Aniston!!!!

  5. Abbott says:

    That tea bag bubble thing is kinda cool. She should use it more often.

  6. Jenns says:

    While not intentional, the Best Black Dresses headline is pretty funny.

  7. Maya says:

    Same white dress Angelina wore for her Vanity Fair interview. Mario Testino tweeted that he shot Angelina in July for this interview.

    No one can make me believe that neither the designer, Jennifer & her agent didn’t know this.

    Basically Jennifer did indirectly admit she stalks Angelina. I never believed that before but now I difinetely do.

    PS: better leave now before the Jen hens arrives and calls us crazy while they themselves will continue to act sanctimonious and hypocrital.

    • Charlie says:

      Jennifer has a better body than Angelina. Angelina has a prettier face. Acting wise, I don’t think Angelina is much better and I think that if she wasn’t so incredibly beautiful she wouldn’t have the career she has had.

      • julia says:

        Well Angelina’s Oscar, 3 Golden Globes, and 2 SAGS say something about her talent.
        Many of Angelina’s roles have not relied on her looks at all.

      • Dingo says:

        This! Acting wise they are on the same level – Angie wins for action, Jen for comedy and actually the drama the are on the same level.

      • DenG says:

        And yet Maleficent is currently at #5 in box office for 2014 movies, After a 4 year absence, that ain’t bad.

      • Charlie says:

        Angelina was great in Girl Interrupted, yes. But she wasn’t that great in other roles. And her looks played a major part in her career. Maybe she didn’t rely on her beauty in every role, but she wouldn’t have had the amount of fame that enabled her to get the roles she got if she was average looking.

        Box office hits rarely corelate with acting ability.

      • lisa2 says:

        That’s your opinion and it is WRONG.

        Angie is a great actress. Memorable.

      • lisa2 says:

        And no one in the industry would ever equate Angie and Jen on the same acting plane.. DEAL and DEAL

      • DenG says:

        Yes, and it’s “correlate”. My point is that people came to see her for whatever reason after a long absence. That’s pretty good to me. Also, she’s a Dame now!

      • Maya says:

        @Charlie: I agree with you that Jennifer has the body but Angelina has the breathtaking face.

        But I never compare their acting talents because it’s different. Personally I think Jennifer is brilliant in comedy while Angelina is outstanding in drama & action. Jennifer cannot do drama while Angelina cannot do comedy.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        I think talent is a matter of opinion. Some people LOVE bad movies/bad actors. I like Angelina, not because she is the best actress in the world, but because, in my opinion, she elevates whatever project she’s in–no matter how crappy. Case in point, Alexander. She was the only good thing in that movie. The entire movie should’ve been about her–then it would’ve done better, I think. The only interesting scenes in the film were between her and Colin Farrell. And that’s what I look for in my favorite actors–the ability to turn an okay role in a okay/bad movie and stand out (in a good way). I feel she has that ability, and that’s why she’s one of my favorites. I don’t feel Jennifer does, and I’ve tried to watch a lot of her movies.

        But I think if you’re going to compare the two–Angelina has her beat. Angelina started winning legitimite awards when she was young and just starting out (not just MTV stuff). She’s a movie star who can headline a major film and make tons of $$$ despite not being in a film for four years. She convinced a major film company (Universal) to hire a woman to direct a film that they were planning to put a lot of their resources into promoting it for the Oscars–and she’s only directed one film before. She had several Oscar winners working with her on the movie (Coen brothers, etc), and actually put together an interesting cast (no obvious movie stars). We’ll see what happens when reviews for Unbroken comes out, but I’m excited.

        Jennifer has directed a lifetime movie, despite professing that she wants to make films that empower women, and has the $$$ to do it. Meaning she doesn’t want to take the risk of her money. Maybe with this new deal with Cinelou she will (I don’t know if she put any $ into the company or if she’s just going to make movies with them), but so far she’s proven that she doesn’t want to take risks. Say what you will about Angelina, she’s taken a lot of risks–and there are a lot of eyes on her. What happens if Unbroken doesn’t do as well as expected (or critics think Angelina’s acting is crap?)–that would be no different, perhaps, than what would happen with any MALE director, who’s doing his second film…..but it’s different with women, and I think that women should support Angelina and Unbroken ( and Gina Prince-Bythewood i.e. Beyond the Lights), because women don’t get this kind of opportunity in HW very often. And money talks.

      • SpookySpooks says:

        Angelina was awful in Alexander. But I do think she’s a slightly better actress than Aniston.

      • Gina says:

        I think they’re both pretty over-rated. Jennifer was great in Friends with Money, but I haven’t seen her as stretching herself in many of her roles.

        I think Angelina is ‘magnetic’ on screen, but she’s not that good of an actress. I’m always aware I’m watching her act, she doesn’t slip into a role. She’s a movie star more than an actress.

        And her acting in Alexander was terrible. Her accent was distracting, her delivery quite campy. But she was just gorgeous in this role, truly stunning.

      • Beep says:

        She’s had critically acclaimed performances in most of her movies even if the movie itself sucks. Some of her best….playing by heart, Gia, girl interrupted, changeling, a mighty heart, Maleficent. She’s recently admitted that she never really loved acting as much as she loves directing… So imagine what her career would be if she actually loved it. Some critics think she should be nominated for Maleficent… I think she’ll be focusing all of her energy on promoting unbroken.

      • Esmom says:

        bogati, “it’s bone deep.” Your comments are vile. Do you judge everyone’s looks so harshly or is Jen your main target?

      • Charlie says:

        Jennifer Connelly is a far better actress than Angelina. And Jennifer too.
        Angelina has more star power. I’m going to stop reading this thread now because you’re going to make me start to dislike Angie, and I don’t want that.

        There are so many new nicknames on this thread.

      • Gina says:

        @Pookah. “Twice Oscar nominated Oscar winning, 3x Golden Globe winning, 2x SAG winning and 347 nom’d critically acclaimed box office powerhouse, youngest Jean Herscholt Oscar award winning, youngest and only *American* ( Dame Commander (courtesy Queen Elizabeth) ever, Global humanitarian, Council on Foreign Relations member, REAL Oscar touted Director and mother of 6”

        Don’t forget all those Razzies she’s been nominated for! Doesn’t she hold some kind of record?

        @Charlie. I like Jolie too, but her fans are too much. think I’ll follow you out.

      • Void says:

        I agree with you there, @Charlie. I think Angelina is on par with Jen in acting; neither are very good. Not a fan of either but Jen’s slightly more likeable than Angelina, who has done a lot of humanitarian work but who nevertheless has this mythomanic vibe to her.

        Horrible to criticise someone for doing good things but I prefer Leonardo’s low key, genuine approach, whereby he does the work and goes back to his St Barts holidays with his VS model girlfriends, demonstrating that he does not give a toss what you think. Angelina Jolie has always come across as an image builder to me. She seems genuine, but all her emotional demonstrations seem to put the spotlight on her, the humanitarian. And she said this about Megan Fox:

        “Is she aiding in Africa or sitting in on U.N. conferences? Donating herself to something bigger than Hollywood? I’m not familiar with her work, is she an Oscar contender?”

      • Termoli77 says:

        I think Jolie started out strong as an actress (the Oscar nod when she was in her early 20s) but her larger than life movie-star persona and notoriety has eclipsed whatever greatness she could have achieved as an actress. Now it’s hard for her to disappear into her roles (I thought she was terrible in The Tourist) but also I think her heart’s not into acting anymore.

        Jennifer Aniston is an average actress best suited for small screen sitcoms. She never even carried a television show on her own; remember she was part of an ensemble with five other actors. All her movie roles are pretty interchangeable. If you see pictures of her in most of her movies, I defy anyone to tell me which one it is – she looks the same in the majority of them. I can’t even begin to imagine her in a period piece.

      • TremeHBOfangrl says:

        Void, like someone else said, neither the industry, acting peers or critics puts Aniston in Jolie’s league as an actress. The late Pauline Kael the most respected film critic in the business lauded Jolie, compared her to Brando. Aniston’s not even in Jennifer Garner’s league as an actress so how has this thread on Aniston’s latest glossy and boring interview become a comparison/contrast and referendom on Oscar winner Angelina? Does anyone believe Aniston got the script for ‘Gravity,’ after Jolie turned it down but before Bullock, Lawrence and Portman?

        As for likable, well it’s true Angelina didn’t play a likable tv character in a sit com for eons, but just from their interviews I think Angelina comes across as much nicer and more warm – Aniston seems cold, and is always complaining and moaning. She also seems to undermine even her own friends. Plus, in my book, anyone who’s pals with the grotesque Chelsea Handler can cross ‘likable,’ right off their resume.

        I’ve been reading Angelina interviews for some time, and unlike your perspective, to me, she always comes across as using philanthropy to help obviously, but to also learn about cultures/issues for her own self betterment and to grow as a person, not to shame anyone else for not doing charity work.

        That’s the opposite of mythomanic, yes? That quote of yours about Megan Fox I knew was fake as soon as I read it. It’s like nothing I’ve ever heard from Angelina, and sounds made up – who talks like that? Where’d you find it? Nevermind, I just Googled – it’s from a 2009 Life & Style tabloid. Even Kaiser questioned it’s validity. If you’re reading hateful tabloids to not only come to your conclusions about Angelina but to also further spread nasty rumors, then that explains everything. You’re right about one thing, it is indeed “horrible to criticize someone for doing good things.”

        To Termoli77, I think when you win Oscars, then are nominated for more Oscars, and other prestigious awards, then win a Herscholt Oscar then become the youngest Dame ever, then embark on a promising directing career all the while ruling the box office before your even 40 — I think that solidifies her greatness in Hollywood and in acting, she has nothing left to prove really.

    • Jayne says:

      Girl you are trolling but I’ll bite. Link to the Jolie dress?

    • Ms. Thang says:

      I wondered if someone would bring up the identical dress Aniston wears in her magazine article. Now let it be said and let it be known. . . Aniston is a stalker. You mean to tell me she didn’t know Angie is wearing this dress? Her perception is anything Angie wears, I can wear better. Aniston is now veering into dangerous territory. I know the Jenhens will holla Angie copied Aniston. Whose interview came out first? Angie usually dresses in black and/or white. Notice how many times JA has been interviewed and wears either black or white? Why does one of her friends always interview her for some article? Can’t she handle an interview by an actual person? The poses and the antics at the Governor’s Award Ball are what Mr. and Mrs. Pitt usually do. I could go on and on and on. Pookah, Emma the JP Lover and Maya, thank you for your continued support of Mr. and Mrs. Pitt. I happen to be a fan also.

      • tracking says:

        Should the gerbils have alerted Aniston about the fashion choices for a photo shoot she could not have seen before doing her own? LOL

      • Brianna says:

        You honestly think she didn’t know, tracking? Come on, of course she did. She follows everything they do.

      • doofus says:

        actually, tracking makes a good point.

        Both covers/interviews are for the December editions of the respective mags. which likely means the photos were shot around the same time. I think it is REALLY, HIGHLY unlikely that either one of them knew what dress/clothes the other would be photographed in.

        what’s much more likely is that dress was a “new release” and the designer has some deal with stylists or styling houses to “promote” their new dresses. Either they used the same stylist and that person is trolling us all by putting them in the same dress, or the dress was sent to a number of stylists and the two hired on these shoots happened to use it. I really don’t see some big conspiracy here.

        but I get it…it fits the narrative that some folks have about Aniston “stalking” the JP family. I wear a lot of black, too, and have since about 1986. am I also “copying” Jolie?

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        I doubt she chose the same dress….agree with doofus. Both look good in the dresses, and this is probably one of Jennifer’s best photo shoots…ever.

    • Ms. Thang says:

      No Maya, you are absolutely correct and no one will call Aniston out on this. Is this stalking Angie? Pure and simple! Yes, she will get away with it and call it cute. Aniston will also say she has no idea The Jolie is wearing the same dress and will blame everyone else, i.e., stylist, etc. Now that the stalking part is out there, maybe someone will finally pick up on it, write about it, and just maybe, just maybe, Aniston will retire her stalking game.

  8. emmie_a says:

    Doing rom coms forever sounds like a terribly boring existence… ok. What about talking about the same boring cr*p all the time, wearing the same clothes, having the same hairstyle, vacationing in the same place, etc… She is the very definition of boring existence.

  9. kibbles says:

    Why did she have to shade Halle Berry and bring up her “geriatric pregnancy” at age 47? Is it because Aniston wants to continue to fuel baby rumors by confirming that she thinks she is still young enough to reproduce?

    It’s kind of embarrassing how she thinks she has a chance at winning an Oscar.

    • Jegede says:

      Yeah that part was stupid

      Having a baby 3 years short of 50 IS considered elderly.
      I’m from a family of GPs and hell 35+ is still considered risky in some quarters

      Admitting it is not a sign of devolution.
      Biology for both men/women is neither agenda driven
      Nor on an anti feminist trip

    • mayamae says:

      Halle herself called her second pregnancy a “geriatric pregnancy”, and it’s actually a term used by doctors (unfortunately).

      • Falkor says:

        Geriatric pregnancy is just a medical term, nothing more. It refers to pregnancies from the ages 35+ which is certainly not elderly. I don’t understand the offense, it doesn’t imply the woman is elderly, it means that after a certain age the risks are different and there are more things to keep an eye out for. It’s a biological fact that fertility declines after the age of 30, so a woman of 47 would be nearing the end of her fertile years. I’m not upset by that (I think kids suck anyway), it just is. *kanye shrug*

  10. Guesto says:

    “He’s an equaliser” “He’s in his body, for sure” “He’s a pretty realized person” “His eyes are so pretty” “We can entertain ourselves and talk about endless things, which is pretty great” “But if you take the law of attraction, if you only love yourself 70 percent…”

    Erm, Jen might be best advised to stick to thinking thoughts rather than expressing them in public where they are in serious danger of making her sound like she is mere inches away from demented hysteria.

    • truthSF says:

      Hahahaha!!

    • jen2 says:

      I think this couple is right for each other, but when she talks about him, she does not really talk about “him”. It just seems like she is trying to convince us or herself how wonderful he is, but has a problem expressing why. “He’s in his body, he is realized, his eyes are pretty”…what the hell does that mean. Why is he a good person, what are the qualities that make it worth being with him. I still don’t know, but if this is where she wants to be, then fine. But he is at her side for the campaign, but for how long. He lives in NYC even when not working (don’t know when his series starts up again since his co-star is pregnant) and visits LA when required.

      Between the two articles for her and Cumberbatch, not sure who is hustling more, but one probably will be nominated and not so sure about the other.

      • Guesto says:

        I hate the hustle with a passion, regardless of who’s doing it, it puts me off them so much, but objectively, Ben, at least, has his cv of seriously good work behind him so I’m good, despite the overkill, with anything award-related that comes his way. But Aniston? Dear God, no. Unless it’s for ‘expressing thoughts in a way that thoughts have never been expressed before’, in which case, she’s an outright winner.

        But only in that ^ category. 😉

      • jen2 says:

        @Guesto. Agree. Cumberbatch is doing it and it will most likely pay off, but this one is just a bit much. She has every right to do so, but when your film was rejected by every respectable distrubution company, meaning they don’t believe in it, then you are really grasping at straws. Her interviews do amuse me though and she should keep “thinking thoughts” about his amazing eyeballs.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        @Guesto, jen2 (Yes, we can all see how I’m avoiding doing my homework, haha)

        That’s my ‘issue’ with this whole thing. The movie was not picked up by any distribution company. There were no interviews to suggest that the movie was so amazing, unique, controversial, dark, etc–nothing to suggest that it would stay with you for a long time i.e. something that critics love, but don’t think it’ll make money…..it was a bad/aimless film, with a good performance (for Jennifer). The only reason it’s special is because it’s Jennifer. Because she’s not wearing any makeup. Because her hair isn’t blonde. Because she’s depressed, and not all perky.

        I mean, more power to you, but it’s kind of desperate. Maybe they think that if they do all of this, and release the movie, that it’ll get more $$….or maybe she’s trying to build up to her Oscar (since she signed on to do four more movies with them)…..

    • Janet says:

      “It’s almost impossible to get bored with one another. We’ve tried so hard! And even that’s interesting because his eyes are so pretty”

      Is that even supposed to mean something? Like what? What’s interesting because his eyes are so pretty? Is she saying he’s never boring because he has pretty eyes? Somebody help me out here. I’m totally confused.

      • KatyD says:

        LOL. I don’t think it’s worth “thinking thoughts” about Aniston “thinking thoughts.” She’s a box of dumb. Even the twenty-something J. Law is more coherent than her. Aniston is easily bested by people 20 years her junior.

        Get used to it–2 more months of deep thinking thoughts brought to you by the greatest thought-thinker we’ve ever thought to see in our lifetime. Behold Jennifer Aniston, thought-thinker extraordinaire! 😉

      • Janet says:

        Good lord, I’ve seen powder puffs with more substance than this woman. What’s she got between the ears, vacuum?

  11. Virgilia Coriolanus says:

    It bears repeating: these two are apart for months at a time. As she just said–she hasn’t done any ‘work’ since June (apart from having a few rc’s to go to, and events like this), and the last time they were together was at her Cake premiere. And then Justin goes right back to NYC. I’d be a lot more believing of their relationship if they actually spent time together. Because it seems like to me, all they do is show up when there’s a premiere. When’s the last time Jennifer and Justin were seen in NYC? This past summer–when they had The Leftovers premiere. I just looked on JJ, and it looks like Jennifer and Justin are flying back to NY together–for how long?

    I’m just finding it mighty suspicious that after months of being apart (and if they were together, Justin went to LA, not Jennifer to NYC), they’re suddenly so in love. I’m not saying they need to grab ass like teenagers to ‘prove’ their love–but there is such a disconnect between the time they spend together, and her gushing about him in an interview.

    And I’m LOL’ing at her description of him as her favorite HW script writer—if he’s so creative, intelligent, a great writer, etc–then why doesn’t she help him out with getting Zoolander 2 made? It’s only ‘announced’. Does a comedy film cost that much? Throw ten million at him. As a wedding present.

    • Falkor says:

      I was lurking around here for years and years before I got the chutzpah to start commenting, and not to be creepy or anything, but I’m kinda your biggest fan. I live for your comments on the triangle, I always feel like I’m getting such a gossip education from you. You know your stuff and I love it! *creeper out*

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        Thanks. I always feel like I’m rambling, but I guess people expect long posts from me by now.

  12. truthSF says:

    This girl (woman?) clearly reads online posts about herself. I swear, it sounds like she’s responding directly to some of the Celebitchy’s posts.

    • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

      Um, yeah. I don’t know who she’s fooling. I’d believe it based on that interview she did years ago, when the chick that Benicio Del Toro got pregnant called her ugly, and she read about it (I can’t remember when it was)—in a tabloid. She was in her mid to late thirties then. And then a year or so ago, CB posted a tip that they might be getting married in some vineyard (and were the only ones to post it), and JA mentioned it in an interview a few days later. She clearly reads about herself, so I don’t even know why she’s playing with us.

  13. Luciana says:

    I know you guys hate her but she looks amazing. Great body!

    • lisa2 says:

      I think she is in great shape and looks good but.. so are many other women her age.

      and I dont’ hate her. She would have had to do something to me personally to equal hate.

      • Camille (The Original) says:

        Her body looks hella photoshopped to me. Her proportions/limbs are not that slim/long.

    • Guesto says:

      Luciana says: “I know you guys hate her but she looks amazing. Great body!”

      I don’t hate her, I don’t even dislike her, I think there’s probably a reasonably nice Jen in there somewhere… but this ‘great body’ myth that her fans persist with mystifies me. In candids (as opposed to eg. the above cover where for eg, her arms are not remotely her real arms as evident in other recent pics) , she has a very ordinary body, and I really struggle to understand why this is something that her fans latch on to and use to big her up, rather than eg. her acting abilities…

      Or wait, I think I may have answered my own question.

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        @Guesto, who wrote: “… but this ‘great body’ myth that her fans persist with mystifies me. In candids (as opposed to eg. the above cover where for e.g., her arms are not remotely her real arms as evident in other recent pics) , she has a very ordinary body, and I really struggle to understand why this is something that her fans latch on to and use to big her up, rather than eg. her acting abilities…”

        At the risk of being called a meany ‘ol meany hater (again), I agree with you … I’ve been saying this for a while now. Jen’s fans talk about her as if she were a statuesque 5’10” beauty with a swan neck, arms, and legs when she is only two-and-a-half inches taller than petite Reece Witherspoon. When I look at Jennifer I see a woman with short legs and a stumpy waist/trunk, who sometimes wears clothes that aren’t appropriate for her frame (much like the Olsen twins). Her ankles must be seriously deformed by now from wearing those stilettos with nearly every outfit she owns in every style (sandals, boots, wedgies, casual shoes and heels).

        Jennifer Aniston is very attractive with makeup, I don’t deny that … and I’ve said all along that I don’t hate Jen, but hopefully the ‘realistic’ photo of her without makeup for “Cake” will dispel the ‘Natural Beauty’ illusion her fans have created for her over the years. Though I doubt it, as many Jen-Hens are still claiming that she is wearing ‘makeup’ to make her look homely in “Cake.” (sigh)

      • Camille (The Original) says:

        +10000 to the above 2 comments.

    • Patti says:

      I don’t hate the woman. I do think people over identify and sympathize with her to the point they will always get offended when she’s criticized. I’m convinced rejection and perceived heartbreak and infidelity (especially when a beautiful woman is involved and seen as a rival) bonds women in communal rage. I thi k that’s what drives her support among many women. I don’t think she’s relevant without it.

      As for what she looks like? Who cares? Why the need to comment all the time on her looks and face when that’s not really her strong suit? I think the consensus is that she’s average, some think better than average, some think worse but it averages out to average. Nothing wrong with that.

      I think sometimes there’s frustration because her supporters use words like stunning, gorgeous and amazing. Which unless your bar is a below sea level that can’t possibly be true. Does she look “amazing?” Well…she looks “amazing” in the way your neighbor lady would if she were gussied and glammed up for a sweepstakes prize appearance on the cover of a woman’s magazine would look “amazing.” She looks “amazing” in the way your mom would if she had a makeover on ‘The View.’

      She doesn’t look amazing for a movie star or even a tv star. She’s ordinary. There’s no shame in that.

      But I feel that’s why most people are so loyal to her despite her having done less than nothing to warrant or merit it – most people see their own plain face staring back at them when they look at her. So they root for her. Sad.

    • Ms. Thang says:

      No her body isn’t that great. It’s what you call photoshopping. Remember, she was supposedly pregnant and looked every bit of it. Middle age spread and perimenopause have now entered her equation. I do believe she works hard for her body, but age is clearly taking its toll. Her body is not what it used to be.

  14. KatyD says:

    Oh, gosh, here we go–the same shallow PR-friendly drivel with the subtext of “I want an OSCAR!” It’s a threat, I think? The Aniston-bot won’t go away until it wins. So, from here on out, it’s going to be hair, make-up, Justin’s eyeballs, yoga, diet advice, and a bunch of self-help cliches about being empowered, rah, rah, rah. Give it an Oscar or it’ll unleash more deep thoughts and PR crap on us. Your choice–Hollywood. Help us all! 😉

  15. Tilly says:

    About her comment about Halle…..Does Jen not understand that women at a certain age cannot have kids anymore? Having kids at 47 is not super common and is advanced maternal age.

    Jen is 45, almost 46, she cannot act like babies are coming for much longer. She has to give up the charade eventually.

  16. Virgilia Coriolanus says:

    And one other thing, that kind of annoys me–the way she talks about her ‘pre Theroux life’….

    I find it weird that she’s always going on and on about how NOW she’s okay. But before she wasn’t. She wasn’t comfortable in herself. Things in her life needed to change. She was changing/evolving. She needed to clean house,etc. And she was making those changes NOW. But the way she talks about it (to me at least) is as if this is a NEW thing. Like right now, suddenly, she realized that stuff in her life wasn’t going right.

    Not to be specific to the Triangle–but that was the entire basis of her Vanity Fair interview. A phoenix rising from the ashes. Sure–I get that, then. Her entire life was on the upheaval–in public. But then three years later, it was the same stuff in Vogue. Talking about how she had entirely changed over her house (or bought a new one). And then in some lesser magazine (Harper’s Bazaar or Marie Claire), she was talking about how she had to spring clean everything from the past five years (she was specifically time-lining her separation and divorce) out of her life, and then in a diff. magazine a few years later, she was talking about how she was a phoenix from the ashes. And now this.

    She really seems to be stuck in a rut, when it comes to stuff like this. I’m not saying that we don’t constantly evolve, don’t have things that we don’t need to fix. But she’s been repeating this same stuff for years. She seems to be stuck in one permanent mode. And she’s 45.

    • jen2 says:

      But she talks like she has been a vestal virgin for the past ten years. She has had multiple relationships (and nothing wrong with that and good for her), but why does she never acknowledge those. Those men also left her, but are never trashed (what’s his name cheating with a younger woman, Mayer calling her dull and saying how great the sex was with Simpson) and what they did was pretty public and pretty tacky. Maybe she talking about forgiving them, but I somehow doubt it.

    • BNA FAN says:

      In most of her interviews I always get the feelings Jennifer is throwing shades at Brad. I always get the feelings she is trying to build up Justin resume, eg. He Justin writes, directs paints and she cannot get bored with him. Remember Brad saying how boring his life was when he was married to her. Brad mentioned he was trying to find an interesting movie when he was not living an interesting life. IMO, Jennifer is trying to say, see, it’s not me, it was my x husband who was boring but now my fiancé is the best man I ever had and his eyes are beautiful and he’s an equalizer whatever that means.

      • BNA FAN says:

        Charlie, time for you and Jennifer to move on, ten years is long enough to mourn a marriage that was over long before Brad met Angelina, and Jennifer knows that is the truth. Go back to the archives and you will see that marriage was over about a year before Brad left that dead end marriage. I hope Jennifer is being truthful about how much Justin is a great man. I can’t forget Justin left his long term girlfriend for Jennifer and they both lied to Heidi about the start of that affair, according to Heidi’s mom their was a overlap between both women, Heidi and Jennifer.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        @Charlie
        He clarified, saying SHE wasn’t boring, but that he was boring. He wasn’t interesting. That’s why there was a big hullaballoo (as I understand) when Brad made Troy, the Ocean’s movies, MAMS–because he’d been doing nothing i.e. made no films for two and a half years–I believe that was the period that he talked about sitting on the couch and smoking pot all day. And then he realized that he was boring, not interesting–that he only lived through his films, so he got off the couch, and started to *do* something. That’s how he started getting involved in charity work–more hands on stuff (getting involved with the ONE campaign, visiting his old college campus,etc).

    • Lisa says:

      To be fair, Brad does exactly the same with his pre-Jolie life thing!

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        Good point–he does, now that I think about. I suppose my main issue is that it doesn’t seem like her life has changed all that much. I can see Brad saying it (although it does get old)–because his entire life did change. He became a lot more focused in his work, and became a father. So someone saying, I’ve never been as happier as when I had my kids with x–that’s normal.

        But for Jennifer, it seems like it’s just a PR line–I guess that’s what I was getting at. Which I think drives the whole, ‘poor Jennifer’ persona in the media. I think Jennifer has an awesome life. She makes tons of money, has lots of fans, can drink and hang out with her girlfriends whenever she wants, and has a lot of men who thinks she’s hot. After her divorce and being dumped by John Mayor–yeah, I can see a little ‘woe is me’…..and talk about the ‘spring cleaning’. But she repeats this over and over again. I just find it annoying. Yeah, she was unlucky in love a few times. But just stop with the ‘I need to get the negative energy out’ stuff……which comes either after she’s broken up with someone, or is with someone. It’s like clockwork. I just don’t find it very genuine, is my entire point.

  17. julia says:

    Jen should next time focus more on making a good film distributors will actually want to buy, rather than thinking that simply not wearing makeup will get her a nomination.
    The producers have never distributed a film before, to get a nomination you need a big studio behind you. Cake is not going to be on any must see lists. To be nominated people actually have to see the film. Also the reviews were mediocre and not outstanding.
    She is delusional thinking this role is so brave.

  18. notasugarhere says:

    “When am I supposed to freak out? When am I supposed to feel like, ‘Oh, my knee! Oh, ouch!’ I don’t feel any of those things!”

    Didn’t Aniston have knee surgery on one or both knees this year?

  19. minx says:

    Not a fan.

  20. lisa2 says:

    So women should evolve to what.. not except that at a certain point in your life regardless of how fit you are you can’t just have a baby when you wish it. Hell that is the case for everyone. Just because you feel 22 your body is still the age it is. AND having a child at any ages is not automatic. There are no switches to flip

    Halle didn’t insult anyone. She was talking about herself and her view of herself having a child at that age. Mind you Halle was not having her first child ever.. but her 2nd.

    I guess she is sensitive about the age thing. But then if you wanted to have kids you could have at any point in your life. But thinking that after a certain age it is mind over matter is childish thinking. And something a lot of women don’t accept until it is too late.

    • Falkor says:

      Bingo. It’s nothing personal, it’s just biology. What’s the point in denying that natural biological changes occur when the literature and a whole shit-ton of evidence tell us they most definitely they do ? It ain’t nothin’ but a thing, folks. I’m not remotely bothered because my fertility or lack thereof does’t define me in any way.

  21. get it together says:

    I don’t like or dislike Jen, so this comment isn’t intending to defend her…I guess I just don’t understand why tabloids make a big deal about the fact that she and Justin haven’t gotten married yet. I especially don’t understand why it’s strange given that this would be her second marriage. What’s the rush? I think too many people rush into marriage because of the societal expectation that a wedding should follow a proposal within a year.

    If there IS “trouble in paradise” between Jen and Justin, I would think the fact that they barely spend time together is way more telling than a long engagement. That, coupled with her senseless gushing is, I think, more indicative of them maybe not being as happy as she wants us to believe.

    • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

      I think that, to some degree, Jennifer and Justin fuel it. Let’s face it–tabloids are going to make sh-t up. Regardless. That’s normal. But they started all of this BS last year after the Oscars. Jennifer was on the front cover of PEOPLE (in her red Oscar gown), and it was all about her wedding plans. How they would be married by the Summer of 2013. And then when that came and went, there was another cover about how they were too busy to get married. And then Jennifer talking about her wedding ‘hair’ in Marie Claire days afterwards (suggesting that the wedding plans were still a go). And then, when Justin was asked about their engagement a few months ago, he said that ‘we’ were more in a hurry than they were. And then said that they had ‘hot feet’–despite saying that they were still waiting to get married. And Jennifer saying much of the same.

      I think THAT, coupled with the fact, that it is VERY notable that they are barely together, is why it’s a ‘big deal’. In terms of the media/tabloids, I don’t think they’re seen as a couple that are the real deal–the couple that’ll stay together for forever and a day. Like with Brad and Angelina–there were so few rumors about their wedding, the entire time they were engaged, I was actually shocked. I was expecting a whole lot of break up rumors, fights over where to have it, etc (the normal crap)–but most of the rumors were stuff like ‘Brad and Angelina are getting married in Iran; Angelina wears a white headscarf!’…..harmless rumors. Because, I think, they are seen as the real deal. I don’t think the media sees Jennifer and Justin as the real deal.

      • get it together says:

        So true, you make a lot of good points! The “hot feet” thing made me roll my eyes when they said that to the tabloids. (I forgot if Jen or Justin actually said it, but regardless, I agree they should have never talked about wanting to rush to the altar if that wasn’t their intention.) I do remember a few tabloids tried to make the trouble in paradise thing happen with Brad and Angie (i.e. “Brad has fling with his assistant on set and Angie is furious!” or “Angelina still talks to Billy Bob and Brad said either he goes or I do!”) but I think since overall it was pretty clear he was devoted to Angelina, those stories were few and far between.

        So, I take my comment back! : )
        I still think society is too quick to wonder if a couple is in trouble if they don’t marry within a certain time after their engagement, but in Jen and Justin’s case, they brought it upon themselves.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        @get it together
        It was Justin who said the ‘hot feet’ comment, at the HBO premiere of The Leftovers.

        Honestly, I don’t care how long they’re engaged–I don’t think that’s indicative of how ‘real’ their relationship is. But you factor in a two year engagement, a big ass ring that isn’t her taste (as shown by her previous jewelry wearing i.e. she wears very little), going to PEOPLE for a ‘scoop’ several times, talking in the media several times about how you never had any wedding plans, AND being apart for the majority of said two year engagement, unless there’s a camera shoved in your face…..that’s when the doubts come in.

        Other than that, I think it’s normal to ask, an engaged couple, when are they getting married. It’s not a malicious question. People are just wondering. I wonder about any celeb I follow, or any person on my FB feed that I see get engaged.

  22. Emma - the JP Lover says:

    Sounds like someone is trying to convince people of something … for sure. Oh and Justin is a “pretty realized person” who doesn’t need to be “rejiggered.”

    PLEASE let these two get married soon so I don’t have to give myself headaches reading this crap.

  23. zut alors! says:

    Why isn’t she ever this articulate in her one on one interviews? In those, she struggles to express herself.
    It certainly gives credibility to what the British Vogue editor said about her.

    Vogue’s editor Alexandra Shulman has revealed that she refuses to put Aniston on the cover because of the actress’s stringent demands over copy approval.
    http://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2012/apr/01/vogue-alexandra-shulman-jennifer-aniston

    • minx says:

      Interesting article, thanks.

    • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

      Yep–that’s why I shade her for that ‘going tabloid’ comment–she knew exactly what was on the cover, and decided to play the victim. Which is why she’ll never be on Vogue or Vanity Fair’s covers again—which I think should totally raise more questions. Didn’t she have their highest sold cover in 2005, on the best cover (September issue)–yet they never did a follow up with her. Someone needs to hassle the chick that interviewed her.

      • lisa2 says:

        That whole thing has always seemed silly.. not because she accused Vogue of going tabloid.. I think they did in a way.

        but she broke down crying.. then she called the guy back on the phone a week later and gave him the Angie was Uncool quote. So it took that long to respond to something Angie has said 2 year prior. A comment she herself had by her own admission read.. Because she said she got Angie’s Vogue magazine to read to see what everyone was talking about. So she had done many other interviews in that 2 year time period.

        it was calculated. The drama had died down a bit and this all brought it all back in full force. If she had said nothing I wonder what things would be like today.

        Well there will be lots of Jennifer and Angie in the next few months.. or not depending on how her Oscar bid goes.

      • nah mean? says:

        So that means she or her team also approved the People cover re : Jen five years after Brad… I would hate for people (no pun intended) to always relate me to my ex. It has been 9 years. Was she the first woman in Hollywood to ever be “left” by her husband? I can’t even think of any Hollywood relationship example from one year ago. Even Ashton was allowed to move on. As I was typing this Family Guy episode just referred to her ad “Jen can’t get a Maniston .” She would not have this reputation if she had forgiven Angie or whomever a long time ago.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        @nah mean?
        PEOPLE collaborates with celebrities–they’re ‘famous’ for it. Doesn’t mean that their stories are true–but it came straight from the celeb’s PR person. So yeah, she approved it.

  24. Bella says:

    Jennifer loves to speak ill of her friends, she must be pretty mean.

    He’s not an ass. He’s not like some of our friends who are young and up-and-coming and they hit celebrity, and all of a sudden you’re like, ‘Oh! You’re different. Now you don’t say hi to people?’ ”

    She is dumb and mean
    I heard Halle Berry refer to her pregnancy at 47 as a ‘geriatric pregnancy,’ which is ridiculous! It’s insulting.

    • Maya says:

      Bingo – Jennifer has no problem throwing her so called friends under bus.

      She always passive aggressively taunts her friends and gets away with it by the media and her fans.

      If she is like this in interviews then imagine what she must be like in real life? She had no shame at all attacking her BFF Courtney Cox over plastic surgery. The very same Courtney who has been her friend for 20 years and also stood by Jennifer and was a true friend.

      That is why I don’t believe Jennifer has any real friends – they are all showbusiness friends who all share the same agent and are “together” for mutual benefits.

      • Ms. Thang says:

        You do realize it’s time for the 10 years without Brad episode from People Mag don’t you? I didn’t really read all of the article above, but if she’s saying she forgives Brad, she’s forgiving him for what? I thought she forgave him years and years ago. Because she, nor her friends, ever threw shade at Brad, only at Angie.

  25. Kitten says:

    ….balls?

  26. Josefa says:

    Eh, Jennifer… it’s not society that screws pregnancies of women in their late 40’s. It’s the female anatomy. Women simply are not designed to get pregnant at that age. You don’t even need a medical degree to know that. You should consider thinking that thought again. If you’ll go on with your charade about wanting a family you should consider adoption or surrogacy.

  27. zut alors! says:

    I wonder what perceived “hurt” she imagined came her way from Halle Berry that caused her to call her out.

  28. Kim1 says:

    Finally and most important her hair( extensions) is incredible.The last paragraphs of that interview sum up Jennifer.Style vs substance.Not once has she talked about “acting” in regard to Cake.She only talks about greasy hair,scars,bulky clothes.Where does she talk about researching or studying the character. Drawing from personal experience.
    Everything is always superficial with her IMO.
    As for shading Halle,Halle has her Oscar and her better body even after giving birth to two kids.

  29. A~ says:

    I like her. I can always predict how the comments will go when there’s a post about her (trending negative). Nevertheless, I find her performances charming.

    • Josefa says:

      I think Aniston has the talents and wits of a wet shoe, but this mean-by-association thing has always bothered me. I may be ignorant about this subject, but, other than speculation about Handler’s shades at Jolie, have we got any empirical proof of Jennifer being mean? Everytime you guys talk about how not-nice Jennifer is, all you bring up is she’s friends with Handler. And I personally think you can be a nice person and get along with people not as nice as you. Jennifer’s been around for a long time so I’m sure if she’s ever directly done something mean and awful, we’d probably know.

      Mind you, I’m not a fan of this woman at all. But I do think she’s pretty harmless, awful filmography aside.

      • Lena says:

        I don’t think anything she’s doing is all that over the top, or anything different than most actors/actresses do if they have a “serious” film. Desperation is timing your wedding (which you don’t seem to care that much about) to the Oscar season.

      • Lou says:

        Are you talking about who I assume you are?
        August is not Oscar season at all. And I think they do care very much about it and their family.

        She is over the top promoting herself in a film no one wanted to buy at TIFF.

      • Patti says:

        Who are you talking about Lena? If it’s Brad and Angelina they got married in August. That’s not awards season. If they’re cynical enough to use a wedding for perceived leverage towards awards season, why would they wait 10 years to do it? You do know they’ve been staples (nominees) on red carpets during award season practically the entire time (10 yrs) they’ve been together, not just since their engagement? Bafta, Oscar, Golden Globes, Critics Choice, SAG. So yeah…you make no sense.

        Also Brad won an Oscar last year, Angelina already has an Oscar and they both were nominated in unison for Oscars in 2009 before they were even ‘engaged.’ Their getting engaged and married increases their chances for their third and fourth Oscar nods respectively, about as much as Aniston’s new ‘fiance’ increases hers. See, zero. It’s insulting for you to think otherwise…and accuse them of such ridiculousness…especially when Aniston herself hijacked last year’s Oscar coverage with fake hype about her wedding that wasn’t…pot meet kettle….then again I’ve heard it all from Aniston fans…they’d accuse Angelina of masterminding the titanic sinking thru time travel if they could.

  30. Cali says:

    It seems that most have missed the point – This is one of the BEST spreads she’s ever done! She looks really beautiful in all of the pics, well done Aniston!

  31. Jayna says:

    It was a nice interview.

  32. neer says:

    After reading & hearing Aniston recently talked in her interviews, I sort of had a headache due to her incoherent statements. I think she is one if NOT the worst celebrity interviewee I have ever heard. She is not fun but difficult to watch & hear during Q & A. I wonder how was she while she was in school during her younger years. She simply cannot express herself well. Does she like reading books? She sounds so stupid every time.

  33. Sal says:

    Wow. Trashy. Where to start? Her saying she doesn’t hold grudges – all evidence to the CONTRARY! She has been so intensely spiteful and bitter for 9 years. Now she wants us to think it was all our imagination? And her once again, copying Angelina with that dress? And bringing up pregnancy…..once again? Seriously she repulsive.

  34. Amcn says:

    Ugh!!! 2 more months of this!!! I need to cancel my internet until after the oscar nominations are out.

    Know your place Rachel. If it weren’t for Friends money you would be a waitress. And there isn’t a damn thing wrong with that.

  35. Trashaddict says:

    Has anybody even addressed the header photo? What the hell is that pocket placement on her butt? Whether it’s a pocket of not, really badly placed. Her body is pretty darn great but that is really not the most flattering outfoot. The hamster ball pictures are better…

  36. Adele Dazeem says:

    I. There is no way on earth Jennifer Aniston is getting an Oscar nomination this year. There are only five slots, with too many worthy performances by other women in films that didn’t need a distribution company to be specifically created just so it could be qualify for Oscar consideration. Oscar nomination is not happening. She can forget it.
    2. Love how she talks about forgiveness and she is a very forgiving person. Isn’t this the same woman who had more than a decade-long estrangement from her own mother?? And only forgave her after her own divorce?
    3. I can excuse her for the Halle Berry shade. I imagine Berry’s own doctor would have described her pregnancy as “geriatric” (hell, all my pregnancies post 35+ were described as such) and Berry was merely repeating the term. I don’t think Aniston was saying Berry was being ridiculous or insulting. She was saying the term “geriatric pregnancy” was.

  37. Kay V says:

    Just once I’d like to see a headline on CB about Benedict Cumberbatch while he’s out doing his PR / Press thing, described as Oscar Baity, Try-hard, Hustles for an Oscar, etc or whatever else is said about Jennifer Aniston for doing basically the same thing…. Just sayin’

  38. Karen says:

    Fake, Fake and more fake. Psycho babble talk. She never speaks personally about Justin-it’s more like she is describing him instead of projecting feelings about him and how he feels about her. He is on the payroll. If you are in love you would hop on that plane and visit him and vice versa.

    I don’t know why she is redecorating his apartment-it’s a smallish apartment in a non luxury building. We have never seen her papped there. It’s the Justin hipster man cave–he won’t let her near building let alone near apartment. And why would she want to rdo apartment he shared with Heidi? Make no sense.

    She cannot conduct an interview that is coherent or remotely interesting. Justin must be ready for a lobotomy after a weekend with her-if this is how she speaks.

    She looks great- but everything is airbrushed these days.

  39. msw says:

    The trio of doom got really boring to me after about 2007 and that’s all I have really known JA for since Friends, so I rarely click on these. I must do so more in the future because the comments are cracking me up.

  40. Andy says:

    Truth…Jen has aged beautifully. Better than Angie, who has suffered from health issues and – possibly- eating disorders (and is considerably younger than Aniston). I think that Jolie is the better actress, by virtue of her more impressive roles, but both women are über-impressive and I can never understand why it is necessary to “choose sides.”

  41. annie says:

    Aniston is never in the same league as Angelina, so i don’t understand the comparison. The only reason why they are being compared is because of Brad Pitt. Angie is the highest paid and most sought after actress in HW and now even as a Director. Aniston is never sought by any studio in HW. She gets projects because she is being managed by CAA.

    The only reason why Aniston is still relevant is because her PR machine has continued to coattail her with Brad and Angelina.

  42. Ally.M says:

    Part of the job, they all promote and ‘hustle’….yawn. The gossip well has been a bit dry lately, we’re well overdue for a juicy scandal.

  43. scout says:

    Jen A is in her own bubble!! Let her have her fun until her bubble bursts (with knee pain) one day! JK 🙂
    BTW Halle Berry said to Kelly Ripa that her doctors listed her as “geriatric pregnancy” because she was 47, she didn’t call herself a geriatric pregnant woman. Medical World considers any pregnant woman over 35 as “geriatric pregnancy” who needs extra care because of the complications which could arise (most will be fine) unlike a pregnant woman under 35. May be they should label it with some fancy medical term other than “geriatric” to make us feel better.

  44. Jem says:

    I used to be indifferent to Aniston. Never watched Friends; was never a fan. Didn’t hate her, didn’t like her, either, didn’t care… But at this point, I can’t stand her. Her PR game is so obvious…She’s so pathetic and desperate.

  45. Ms. Thang says:

    To TremeHBOfangirl: And the congregation says “Amen”.