“Did Mary-Kate Olsen have some not-so-subtle work done?” links

Did Mary Kate Olsen get some plastic surgery/Botox? [Wonderwall]
Beyonce is still Photoshopping her Tumblr photos. [Dlisted]
Rihanna’s stalker is insane, apparently. [Evil Beet]
Charlie Sheen & Denise Richards are burying the hatchet. [CDAN]
Nick Jonas is kind of a mess these days. [Starcasm]
Amanda Bynes has purple hair now. [ICYDK]
Leelee Sobieski welcomed son Martin back in August. [Celebrity Baby Scoop]
Selena Gomez wore a weird suit. [IDLY]
Amanda Bynes has been tweeting about Hitler. [Bitten & Bound]
Jessica Pare’s colorblocking is kind of blah. [RCFA]
Christmas gift ideas! You can all expect gift cards, just FYI. [The Frisky]
Here’s a giveaway for Calvin Harris’s new album! [PopBytes]
Is this bus ad inappropriate? Eh. [Seriously OMG WTF]

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

59 Responses to ““Did Mary-Kate Olsen have some not-so-subtle work done?” links”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Kitten says:

    She does look different..but I can’t figure out what it is? Bigger cheekbones?
    I hope she’s not losing too much weight again..

    • word says:

      I don’t know. I think it’s just the angle and she’s sucking in her checks. There is a slight difference in make-up between the two and hair tucked behind the ears…plus they never were identical. One always looked a bit different than the other.

      • bettyrose says:

        I dunno. Fraternal twins – as they claim to be – don’t look any more alike than any other siblings. They’ve always looked more alike than non-twin siblings. I mean, they played the same character on tv for 8 seasons (I googled that, not a personal expert on full house). Since they were cast as babies, there was a risk of fraternal twins growing up looking different from each other – so why wouldn’t producers have sought identical twins instead? I’m just saying, I’ve always doubted the claim that they aren’t identical.

      • word says:

        You make a good point. Why did the producers not cast identical twins? I’ve always saw a slight difference between the two. To be honest, the difference was more obvious to me as they got older…as toddlers I couldn’t tell them apart.

      • Tiffany :) says:

        But even identical twins look different. I think the producers probably thought they looked alike enough and were only going to be on the show as very small children. When casting kids, their ability to speak and their temperament is most important.

      • gina says:

        Nah, it looks like cheek implants. Half of the fun with these munchkins was trying to figure out which was which. Now it’s easy. Patty and Cathy Duke.

      • Lex says:

        Nope I grew up wirh fraternal twins who looked pretty much identical – most couldn’t tell them apart. Just as I know non twin siblings who are practically identical. What does ‘as they claim to be’ mean…….? Why would they lie about that?

        I think, if anything, she now looks more similar to her sister Elizabeth.

      • Someonestolemyname says:

        She’s look the same to me, feature for feature, looks like her sis.

      • Mel M says:

        Yeah, I went to school with two sets of fraternal twins that I thought we’re identical initially. The older they have gotten though the more they look different.

      • Louise177 says:

        I agree that it looks like she’s sucking in her cheeks. This shot could have been taken while she was making a face. Also this is the only photo I’ve seen of her. It’s odd that at a red-carpet event there aren’t any more photos.

    • Candy Love says:

      I couldn’t figure it out yesterday ether.

      • QQ says:

        me Neither… Is cheekbones or Mouth.. but I am not sure which one or if both or if the makeup/hair is what is throwing me

      • Candy Love says:

        I agree it somthing off with her mouth and/or cheek maybe even her chin I just can’t put my finger on it. I don’t think it the makeup or hair because that’s the norm for her, she had that same look in many red carpets pictures.

      • KCO says:

        All is see is Jared Leto…

    • Laurie says:

      Chin implant?

      • Gobo says:

        Maybe. Or too big veneers? It looks like the whole distance from where her septum ends to her chin’s tip has been elongated.

    • bluhare says:

      I wonder if she veneered her teeth and they’re bigger than she’s used to. My neighbor did that, and it took her forever. And she lisped. 🙂

    • Amanda says:

      She’s pregnant! Her face is smoother because her face is more full due to her pregnancy. Look at her recent photos closely.

    • wiffie says:

      Omg she’s Francine from the Arthur books/kid show!!

    • ol cranky says:

      her cheekbones and jaw look like they’ve been changed to give her a different shape to her face. to me, it looks like she tweaked her face to look more like Elizabeth (maybe b/c she thought it’d make her look younger?) but she landed somewhere between the faces of her sisters and now looks much older

  2. Maddy says:

    This is the problem with having a twin – even though they’re technically non-identical – any work you have done is suddenly much more obvious!!

  3. Size Does Matter says:

    Um, which one is Mary Kate again?

  4. lower-case deb says:

    that Girlfriends’ bus ad reminds me of a joke circulating around the medical campus. about the surgeon telling her firsties to pay attention to her every action and copy it… stuck a finger inside a corpse etc etc. moral of the story: it pays to pay attention.

    nice coincidence since Lisa played a doctor in House. gosh i miss Hugh Laurie btw.

  5. LilyT says:

    Cheeks and upper lip? It’s making her whole face look distorted. Unfortunate to have your genetic copy standing right next to you all the time.

  6. trishy says:

    Jessica Pare’s dress reminds me of spumoni. Mmmm, spumoni.

  7. Karen says:

    Looks like fillers above the cheeks. Ashleys eyes have a drop in fullness under the eye (which is normal) before the curve of the cheek pops, MK goes from eye lid directly into cheek: one angle, no curve.

    They did better to have the same lip injections and nose jobs. Less obvious as they stand next their mirror.

  8. word says:

    Hey Nick Jonas, let your talent speak. Why the need to go all “Miley” ?

  9. Reece says:

    I prefer gift cards as gifts. Just give me the money and let me buy what I want.

  10. Leslie says:

    They both started getting work done on their faces (corners of mouth lifted) when they were barely 20. No surprise that they continue getting work done.

  11. kri says:

    1. Yes, she did.

    2. Yes, she is.

    3. Aren’t all stalkers pretty much insane?

    4.Bury that hatchet down low, Denise.

  12. T.Fanty says:

    If she had wanted to improve her looks, a decent haircut would have been a better place to start.

    God, those girls are creepy.

  13. Luciana says:

    Wow what the hell is going on on MK face? She reminds me of Renee Zellweger. Ashley looks good.

  14. bns says:

    Cheek fillers, several nose jobs, greasy hair, bad makeup, a history of smoking and doing drugs, and dating a 44-year-old man who looks like he’s in his 60s will do that to you, I guess. I used to love them when I was growing up.

  15. Halah says:

    So glad you posted this I can’t figure it out either. Is it possible she had some work done on her teeth or veneers and it’s messed up her bite causing her jaw/chin to stick out a bit?

  16. LAK says:

    Different presentation. That’s all. One is wearing make up you can see whilst the other one is wearing ‘no make up’ make up AND she’s darkened her hair which also apears to be several days’ blow out.

    I can finally tell them apart though they’d have to stick to this presentation of themselves!!

    • Anony says:

      I disagree…Mary-Kate has often gone natural or less makeup than her sister. Something is different in her face structure…she looks way more androgynous than she ever has in the past. Check out photos from a year ago…

  17. girlnbayou says:

    Would it kill them to smile…with their teeth? They would both be so much prettier. They look extra morbid and old with those drawn up pursed lips. Blech! Instead they just look unhappy and miserable all the time.

  18. St says:

    One of them is looking 25. Other one looks like she is 35. Super weird.

  19. Denise says:

    Her face is super tight, it’s like she got completely unnecessary botox. That doesn’t bode well for how she’s going to look in the future. And that hair is not doing her any favours, either. Edit: She’s definitely got fillers in her cheeks for reasons that elude me.

  20. Ryan says:

    It’s the lower part of her face that looks different to me, like if there were such a procedure as getting your jaw extended forward. Anyhow, I do hope the different look isn’t the result of any type of weight loss and that she is happy enough.

  21. MediaMaven says:

    The Olsen on the left looks like the Madam Tussaud’s version of the one on the right…….close, but no cigar.

  22. WTF says:

    The noses are definitely different. One is longer and thinner at the tip.

  23. manda says:

    I’ve never been able to tell one from the other, but I never really tried either. I do think that the one on the left (mary-kate, I guess) looks sad or depressed, mainly because she looks unwashed. My mother would have given me so much hell if my hair ever looked like that!