Kim Kardashian’s velvety dress at Paris haircare launch: unflattering or cute?

FFN_KardashianPC_CHP_041515_51711111

Here are some photos of Kim Kardashian launching the ‘Kardashian Beauty Hair’ line at Marionnaud in Paris yesterday. Her dress is all one piece, in case you were wondering. There’s a cut-out at the waist and the top and bottom are connected at the sides, then there’s a tie-back. Overall, this kind of dress is made for someone built like Taylor Swift. We’re supposed to be able to see the cut-out, and the faux-bandeau is supposed to “sit up” a lot higher than we’re seeing on Kim. So, basically, another styling failure. Why does Kim always make it so complicated? Granted, it’s more difficult to dress someone curvy AND short. But Kim makes it so much harder on herself. Here’s my something nice: I don’t hate the fabric at all. If this had straps and no waist cut-out, this might have been a good look.

Here are some other Kimye stories percolating through the system:

*There was a rumor that Kim and Kanye were going to renew their vows in Paris. We’re coming up on their first wedding anniversary and while I’m sure it’s going to get crazy and superficial, Gossip Cop says that Kimye will not be renewing their vows in Paris. Sad.

*I’m starting to wonder what Kim and Kanye will wear to the Met Gala. They’ve gone to the Met Gala two years in a row – I’m sure they’ll be going this year. And I’m sure that Kim’s dress is going to be hideous.

*Various media outlets are running “exclusive first looks” at Kim’s book of selfies. These first looks are nothing special if you spend any time looking at Kim’s Instagram.

*You know how Kim and Kanye had North baptized in Israel this week, and Kimye went to dinner with the mayor of Jerusalem and there were photos? Well, “ultra-orthodox” media outlets edited Kim from the photos. Because she’s a p0rn star. Seriously.

FFN_KardashianPC_CHP_041515_51711053

FFN_KardashianPC_CHP_041515_51711051

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

120 Responses to “Kim Kardashian’s velvety dress at Paris haircare launch: unflattering or cute?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Samtha says:

    Minus the fake booty, she has a cute body. Shame she doesn’t know how to dress for it.

    • Smd says:

      Samtha, so right.

      Sofia Vergara has mastered dressing well for her curves, it makes a huge difference and she looks gorgeous. I’m beginning to think K is doing it on purpose to keep people talking negatively, lots of gossip!

      • prettylights says:

        I agree, she does have a cute body. This dress would be a home run if it had straps (she looks about one wrong move from falling out of the top) and if it had a belt to draw in the waist vs the barely visible cut out. She could look so fabulous if she’d only follow a few basic fashion ‘do’s’ instead of trying to look so model-like all the time. She just does not have the body for that. I’m similarly built, minus the giant fake boobs and butt, and have to be careful about what I wear to not look bigger than I am.

      • Michelle says:

        @prettylights I feel like Kim used to do a really good job of dressing her body pre-Kanye. I can somewhat understand why he found it necessary to do a makeover on her because the majority of the time I did think her taste could be very tacky, but she knew what cuts worked for her. I think aside from all the makeup and the nips and tucks on her face here and there that Kim is really pretty and that she used to be gorgeous. She doesn’t need all the “razzle-dazzle” ill-fitting clothing Kanye seems to like putting her in.

        These are only 2 examples of back when Kim dressed herself, but I think she looks really good in these pictures:
        http://www.starstyle.com/arriving-on-set-of-midori-liquor-photo-shoot-in-los-angeles-march-9-2012-pic82771.jpg
        http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/06/15/article-2003693-0C9124F500000578-519_468x708.jpg

      • prettylights says:

        I agree Michelle, she used to wear some really adorable age-appropriate and flattering things before Kanye. That blue dress pic – she looks great! Nothing hanging out, tight but not too tight, and the sleeves offer some modesty and support but don’t look matronly. Sigh Kim, sigh. She truly was gorgeous (and her body was much cuter without the butt injections) and now she looks so plastic and alien. Still beautiful, but there’s just something off and so fake about her face now – I think she nipped and tucked until her face is too perfect, if that makes sense. I think she really is trying to morph into a mannequin.

      • Tiffany :) says:

        I completely 100% agree that Kim has a lovely figure and could dress it in more flattering ways.

        That being said…Sofia V. isn’t a good comparison. She is much taller than Kim, and her hips and bunz (while very toned) are TINY! You’d think that she has thicker hips, but really, her waist just goes in so far that it makes it look like she has curvy hips. In real life, Sofia’s butt looks like it is 12 only inches across.

      • Ange says:

        @ Michelle those pictures highlight Her much better previous style as well as her much better previous nose.

    • Bobbityboo says:

      Just an FYI: the orthodox newspapers in Israel edit out women period from their papers (they did it to Hilary Clinton as well) – not just Kim K.

    • alicegrey12 says:

      The dress is unflattering. enough said.

  2. NewWester says:

    I am not sure about the dress but I do like the coat.

    • denisemich says:

      Her hair looked greasy. I am not sure if it was the product + her 3-day wash routine….. But I won’t use that product.

  3. klein says:

    George Orwell once stated that ‘advertising is the rattling of a stick inside swill bucket’.

    It’s a shame we will never get to hear his thoughts on Kim

    • Mispronounced Name Dropper says:

      Probably won’t get to hear Kim’s thoughts on Orwell either.

    • deluxemickey says:

      Based on the title, I thought “Animal Farm” was Orwell’s biography of the Kardashian family.

    • FLORC says:

      And this whole article/comment/thread is additional advertising for the K’s. So, Orwell’s words apply negatively to this too.

      He did call we’d lose our humanity.
      “If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever.” Sounds like that applies here.

      • Bob Loblaw says:

        I actually disagree, the old adage, of all press being good press is not so true in modern times. Kardashian over saturation will destroy them, and we’ll all warm ourselves off the glow.

  4. Beatrice says:

    Her face looks very different from just a few weeks ago. Her “sausage casing chic” style only makes her look dumpy. She could look good if she dressed for her body type. Very sad that an unlimited clothing budget doesn’t mean a thing.

    • LadyMTL says:

      Just proves that money can’t buy everything (taste, class, clothes that fit properly, a face that doesn’t look like a Realdoll, etc etc etc).

    • Go Figure! says:

      I thought the same thing. She has had something done to her face. I’m not sure I’m liking this look. As usual, she is stuffed into her dress. If Kanye is her stylist, she needs to fire him. He does her a great disservice.

    • epiphany says:

      That’s what I said yesterday – particularly the area between her nose and mouth – it looks like molded plastic! Can you imagine the effort it took her to grimace-smile in the above photo? Looks downright painful!

    • Pandy says:

      Yes, I thought that as well. Her facial structure looks different somehow.

  5. GoodNamesAllTaken says:

    Kim, Kim, Kim. You have so much money. There are so many truly beautiful clothes just right at your fingertips. Why do you always get it wrong?

    • Tiffany27 says:

      I know I always say this, but I truly, truly, truly believe Kim wears unflattering things on purpose. She wants to be talked about. Period. Once in a blue moon she wears something really cute, but cute outfits don’t get her talked about.

      • Josephine says:

        I agree with that. Surely no one would do what she has done to her body and dress the way she does and think that it looks good. I guess it’s become her job to always display herself, and do so in a way that people look. No one is fabulous enough to always have attention for just being pretty, and certainly not her, so she’s taken another route. America apparently likes a train crash, and she keeps providing it.

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        Oh, interesting. I never thought of that, but it does make sense.

      • Sarah says:

        I was just thinking the same thing. If she didn’t dress horribly, no one would write about her. And that is her idea of a disaster! So she dresses to look wretched.

      • Pip says:

        See I don’t even know if it’s that – like I think she definitely does dress in a way that she sees as deliberately provocative but also super ‘fashion’, rather than that she knows it’s bad. I think she (or more likely Kanye) probably sees cute as beneath them, or at least the new ‘on vogue, friends with Anna Wintour’ image that they’re trying to project, that they’re trying so hard to be ‘high fashion’ without even thinking about if she looks good in it.

  6. swack says:

    Let’s talk about the hair. She is promoting hair care products but her hair looks like it needs to be washed. It looks either greasy or there is too much product in her hair.

    • Sarah says:

      I don’t see what you’re seeing. It looks lovely and sleek and shiny (not oily)

      • swack says:

        Then she has too much product in it because it looks plastered down to me.

      • Josephine says:

        I agree with Swack. For someone whose hair usually looks very good, it looks flat and lifeless here, and like she has split ends. She must wear wigs quite a bit because this doesn’t even look like human hair, and the changes are too drastic for it to be hers. Maybe this is her flat, real hair and everything else is a wig. I also don’t get why celebs who so very obviously wear wigs and extensions promote hair products. It is sheer stupidity to think your hair product will make your hair look as good as someone whose hair isn’t even all hers.

    • Shambles says:

      I was actually going to say I thought it was strange that she’s promoting hair care when this is either extensions or a wig, based on the fact that she was Lucius Malfoy 2 weeks ago. Or that was a Lucius Malfoy wig 2 weeks ago. Either way, she’s not the first person I think of when I think “hair expert”

    • Dawn says:

      My bottom line is whatever product a KarTrashian and now Jenner is hawking it means I am not spending my money on it. Especially if they put their name on it. Their products are made on the cheap and sold for too much.

    • PinaColada says:

      Totally agree, Swack. When she first cut her hair and it was dark, it looked bouncy and great. Here it looks really gross. Looks like it’s wet! Needs to be washed

      • swack says:

        I loved that haircut. But this style does not entice me to buy whatever she is shilling.

  7. Sarah says:

    Maybe not in this colour but this dress *would* look really good on Taylor Swift!

  8. It is what it is says:

    LOL @ her being edited out because of her harlot beginnings according to ultra cons, that’s amazing/hilarious

    • Wilma says:

      She would always have been edited out, just for being a woman. Angela Merkel was edited out of photos of the Charlie Hebdo demonstration and I’m pretty sure Merkel didn’t star in home-made porn.

    • Sarah says:

      It is an ultra-orthodox news site, so it seems very logical that a porn star (which is how she started out) would be edited out. People with ultra-orthodox beliefs are never going to cozy up to someone who got famous with a sex tape. They’re con-ser-va-tive, people. It’s not my cup of tea but I respect their right to have these beliefs. Just like I respect the rights of polyamorous, tree-hugging vegans too (sarcasm).

      • Leen says:

        Not really. As someone else pointed out, they also cut out Angela Merkel, and she’s a respected politician in her own right in international affairs (and kind of insulting if you ask me since Germany lavishes many new weaponry on Israel for free, and dares not criticize them in the UN).
        So no, it doesn’t have much with Kim being featured in a porno.

  9. lucy2 says:

    The dress wouldn’t be bad if it fit properly, covered her boobs and wasn’t see through. Which could be said about most things she wears.

  10. Annie says:

    This is a better look than a lot of other things she wears!

    On another note – She looks more sophisticated – and classier, even sexier – with shorter, shoulder length hair she had a few weeks ago, imo. Why many women insist on long hair (extensions) is beyond me. After a certain maturity in the face, shoulder length looks so much better. Again, imo.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      That was the best hair she’s ever had, but it only lasted a few days. Too bad.

    • Neonscream says:

      Agree that KK looked better with the shorter hair but that’s likely because the rest of the time she has extensions and no matter how good the quality extensions never look quite right. I’m very nearly 40 and have very long hair. Roughly once a week a complete stranger tells me how great my hair is. I always assumed that at some point I’d go for a “grown up” length but it hasn’t happened yet. Some faces look better with some length.

      • Kitten says:

        Yes some mature women look fantastic with long hair. I’d probably be one of those random strangers that would compliment you because I’m always looking at women’s hair. That sounded creepier than I meant it to.

        But I do agree that Kim’s hair was FANTASTIC without the extensions. It looked so light and breezy-much more youthful and soft. This look on her is way too harsh and once again, just emphasizes her alien face.

      • swack says:

        I had short hair for most of my children’s lives – more convenient. Three years ago they talked me into growing it out. I’m 61. Someone told me last night I look younger.

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        Yes, I think it depends on your face. There’s not a magic age where you need to have short hair. My hair was shoulder length until last year because my husband likes it that way. I really felt it was aging me, so I cut it a couple of inches, and I love it, and he even admits I look younger. But it depends on your face. I could never have truly short hair because it looks awful on me.

  11. Elisabeth says:

    I went with unflattering before even clicking the link

  12. Mispronounced Name Dropper says:

    Wow. She’s almost smiling in a couple of those photos. Quick to the Botoxmobile!

    An aside: I came across a story about the most adorable cat today: http://www.onegreenplanet.org/news/nurse-cat-comforts-other-sick-animals-in-polish-animal-shelter/

  13. RUDDYZOOKEEPER says:

    In the first photo w/ the coat on, I thought the cutout was a camel colored belt & was rather (surprisingly) impressed & thought this was the best of her bad fashion choices I’ve seen. … Upon discovering the belt was actually a cutout, I immediately was ashamed of my premature and unwarranted praise.

  14. Miss W says:

    Her skin is perfect. Agh. I’m so jealous.

  15. BRE says:

    Her face in some of the outdoor pics I saw of her from this event made her start to look like Octomom! Her face under natural sunlight is starting to look scary!

    • chaine says:

      +1 i was seeing Octomom, too. something about the way her lips and cheeks are waaaaaaay over-plumped.

  16. Jen43 says:

    Why does she never wear anything to show off her legs? They are probably good legs.

  17. Dońt kill me i'm french says:

    A French guy won a contest to meet her.He waited 4 hours in a room before to meet her.
    The meeting lasted 1 minute…she said him “hello nice to meet you” ,he replied her ” you’re so beautiful” then they took a pic together and she signed on a hair lacquer to give him and she exited

    • Julie says:

      What did he expect? Did he think they’d go to dinner together, take pictures and videos for KUWTK, and sign everything he wanted? She does have other things to do

    • dottie says:

      At a celebrity book signing they say hi while signing and might let you take a picture after waiting in line for hours

      • me says:

        Yeah but the guy won a contest so there should have been a little something extra. Maybe a longer conversation, a few more pics, a gift bag? I don’t know but damn 4 hours is a long time plus who knows what he had to do to win that contest.

    • Bob Loblaw says:

      She’s selfish and self-involved, he’s lucky she honored the commitment at all.

  18. MrsBPitt says:

    I wonder how many people it takes to get Kim stuffed into the clothes she wears. Seriously, I remember when I gained a few pounds and was trying to put on a pair of pants that were obviously, a size too small, and I was pulling, tugging, laying on my bed, sucking in my stomach, legs up in the air!!!!!!! It makes me think, they put the material on her and sew it up while she is in it!!! I can’t think of any other way she gets into those clothes!!!!

  19. Crumpet says:

    She can certainly afford to have her clothes tailored, so why doesn’t she?

    • Josephine says:

      I’ve always wondered if it is because she borrows so much of what she wears.

      • Julie says:

        Borrowers can’t be choosers. It’s time she gets a little bit picky about what she wears and looks in the mirror

  20. MrsBPitt says:

    I will, certainly, run right out and buy Kim’s book of selfies, BECAUSE I DON’T GET TO SEE ENOUGH OF KIM ON EVERY WEBSITE, EVERYDAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  21. Dita says:

    WHY DOESN’T SHE WEAR HER CORRECT SIZE?! Sorry for yelling so early I haven’t had my tea yet. But seriously why does she refuse to wear her actual size? Why is no one around her saying, honey you look stuffed and crazy wearing clothes 3 sizes to small. SIgh….

    • Pumpkin Pie says:

      With all the deformities she put her body through, it must be difficult to even tell what size she is. Or maybe she refuses to accept it.

      • me says:

        She has to tailor her clothes which makes me wonder how can they never fit right when a professional is measuring her and tailoring the clothes to her exact measurements ?

    • TeaAndSympathy says:

      I agree with you all, Dita, Pumpkin and me. If she ever does get anything off-the-rack, she’s probably really scared of the numbers, and it’s likely (at least partly) because of what she’s done to her body. Also, I’ve seen on DM many times where they have that “shop box” thing, and it has stated that this or that outfit has been custom-made by Givenchy, Balmain or whatever, so is not available to the public. So why are they making clothes for her in such small sizes? I’d have thought she’d be guided by those who know better than her, or is it that the just make the outfits in the largest runway size? She’s not six feet tall and not a bean pole, so how does she expect to look like the runway models who wore it? Talk about deluded.

  22. maeliz says:

    Time for a stylist. Who besides Kim would wear a sheer, lace, strapless, to tight dress to a haircare launch?

  23. Tracy says:

    I think both the dress and the coat are very beautiful. However, the dress doesn’t look it’s best on such a large breasted woman. It would look much better on a taller, slimmer woman with smaller breasts.

  24. Dawn says:

    If she was about 6 inches taller and didn’t have those hips or that fake butt I would think the dress would be cute. But it isn’t on her. She is just getting old and predictable and always makes it about sex and does anyone care about her anymore? All she can do is photos because her voice is so awful it is hard to listen to. Not to mention that her vocabulary sounds as if she got left behind in JR. High. Nope, this woman is pathetic with her fake face, boobs and butt and her lack of any real talent.

  25. shizwhat says:

    I think she looks good here. Everything fits and accentuates her figure. The colours are good, her hair is sleek. We’ve seen way worse. I don’t really get the criticism that she doesn’t dress for her shape because she does. She always tries to accentuate her waist, which if she didn’t, she’d look frumpy. If anyone has any idea what sort of style or silhouette she should be wearing please let me know because I don’t get it!

    I honestly think she picks her outfits based on what they look like when she’s standing still and posing. Anyone looks good that way but depending on your body type, and generally, the more voluptuous you are, the more her usual style tends to shift when walking about… thus, making her look like 10 lbs of potatoes in a 5 lb bag.

    • jwoolman says:

      But a few years ago, she always looked good. The colors and fit of her clothes suited her. And she didn’t look so much like a manikin. Maybe not as good as ten years ago before she made too many surgical changes, but much better than in recent years.

      Although her face does seem more mobile lately- not quite natural, but closer to it than in a while. Has somebody advised her to attempt to smile a bit for the cameras because it looked too creepy? Or is she actually tapering off on the injections?

    • dottie says:

      @shizwiz, are you looking at the same picture of Kim I am? No, she doesn’t look to great. Yes her hair looks good, but if it doesn’t she can just remove the extentions and put a wig on. She never wears clothes that fit right anymore and are usually black. The colors she’s wearing in the picture are drab, don’t go together, and don’t look good on her.
      She used to be beautiful and dress a lot better but ruined it all

    • Josephine says:

      I think the problem is that she emphasizes her waist, and her chest, and her butt, nothing is tailored to fit her, and she always wears her clothing in a size or two too small. The idea of some of her clothes might be ok, but the execution is never quite right. Clothes should fit well, and hers simply do not. She also frequently wears clothes that emphasize her hips and make her look wider than she is.

    • Bob Loblaw says:

      She’s too short for the crop top, she wears it all the time and it cuts her off and makes her look stumpy. She should wear wrap dresses, they would accentuate her tiny waist and flatter her feminine curves. She could look amazing everyday of the year, even with the ludicrous augmentation, if she dressed for her actual build instead of Kanye’s gay fantasies.

  26. Longhairdontcare says:

    This color is so wrong. Does nothing for her AT ALL. The cut is off too. Her legs look really short and thick. And this selfie book is seriously nauseating. I cant think of anything more narsissistic. Barf

    • chaine says:

      not to mention that most of them are NOT selfies, they will be photoshopped all to heck, and they won’t look any different than the ten thousand million selfies she already tweets and instagrams every day already.

      • me says:

        She stated the pics were all unfiltered. LIES ! We know she filters and photoshops the heck out of all her “selfies”. If this book becomes a bestseller, we should all be ashamed of ourselves as a society.

  27. Hannah says:

    The outfit would be REALLY cute if it wasn’t so sheer and fit properly. And I can see why she doesn’t smile now, it really highlights the work she had done.

  28. FingerBinger says:

    You probably can’t wear a bra with that outfit but she needs one very badly.

    • Pumpkin Pie says:

      My guess is that she shows her twins on purpose. So many pics with t&n. Why wear a bra?

  29. meme says:

    Ugh.

  30. LisD says:

    Is it me or does she look like a wax figure in the pictures where she is shilling whatever product that is?

    P.S. – I hope to God her and Kanye are not the type of celebs that renew their vows every freaking year. That grates on my nerves so bad especially when they just end up divorced.

    • Chrissy says:

      I thought the same about Heidi Klum and Seal repeating their vows year after year after year…only to divorce recently. Something is very wrong when a couple tries desperately to convince everyone that they’re so haaaapppppy. Anything for attention, I guess.

  31. The Original Mia says:

    Gotta correct you, Kaiser. They didn’t edit her out because she’s a p0rn star. They edited her out because she’s a woman. They do to every female. Doesn’t matter her status. Angela Merkel was a ‘shopped out of the support rally for the Paris terrorism victims.

    • ya says:

      Ya exactly – was going to say the same thing.

    • cheryl says:

      Genuine question. Why is it required that women are edited out? Are they not allowed to have a public life? Are readers not allowed to gaze at female people? Is it just the images or are the names made invisible as well?

  32. Pumpkin Pie says:

    What hair products? Wasn’t she wearing a wig or something?

  33. Pumpkin Pie says:

    Oh please, wasn’t she wearing a wig at some point?

  34. word says:

    She is way too over-exposed. Why is the media so up her ass?

  35. chloeee says:

    I think the color and material is pretty but I am over the cutout trend

  36. Jenny says:

    That is a beautiful dress that looks horrible on her.

  37. me says:

    Yes she is going to the met gala…she had a fitting for her dress in Paris I believe. I’m sure it will be tacky.

  38. prissa says:

    God, she is such a one trick pony!!!

  39. dawnchild says:

    I clicked on this by mistake because I’ve been on a conscious kick of never clicking on a Kartrashian link anywhere…thus denying them at least one-one-hundredth of a million of their main commodity. I think I clicked on this because
    a) I hadn’t had my tea, and was in brain fog;
    and b) saw something about velvet and I had been thinking about velvet…in relation to what to wear to a fancy event I was just invited to…

    Anyhoo…just wanted to say that if any Western celebrity woman was built for a sari, this is the one. She would look great in one.

    I say this as I contemplate my saris wondering which one is less likely to make me look twice the size of my husband 🙂

  40. yep says:

    I still cant get over her ass crack and how it travels to her back waist line.

  41. Dr.Funkenstein says:

    Trashy is as trashy does. That’s all I’ve got.

  42. Jag says:

    If she gets any more nose jobs, she won’t have a nose!

    Hate the dress. Huge pasties to hide herself up top, so why even wear a dress that’s completely see-through? It’s not like we haven’t seen it before, Kim.

    If I had one tenth the money she does, I’d be able to look cute all the time. And yes, I’m short and curvy like her. I’d ask her to hire me but I want nothing to do with that family.

    • Bob Loblaw says:

      She could look amazing but she always looks like crap. It has nothing to do with her figure, artificial as it is, and everything to do with her atrocious taste.

  43. mootwo says:

    The ultra orthodox media didn’t edit Kim out of the photos because she’s a p0rn star. They edited her out because she’s female. And they would edit out any woman in photos they publish, including heads of states.

  44. Noxie says:

    She looks like a charicature of her former self. Or like a Kim K impersonator.