Mar 23
'09
Angelina Jolie’s ‘lost’ first film will get director’s cut re-release


Angelina Jolie’s first foray into acting was a role given to her by her father and his friends. She was four years old when director Hal Ashby cast her in Lookin’ To Get Out, starring her father Jon Voight, a film that was originally released in 1982. Before Ashby’s death in 1988, he made a director’s cut of the film. The cut was archived at UCLA, and then Ashby’s biographer found it. Ashby’s daughter and Jon Voight were thrilled that the cut was found, and that director’s cut version is about to be released.

Voight gave an interview where he talked up the “lost” film, and even revealed that it was Ashby’s daughter’s favorite film of her father’s, because she believes that the Angelina Jolie character was loosely based on her. Contact Music has more:

Angelina Jolie’s first movie role in a forgotten 1982 comedy is set for release - 17 years after it was made. Jolie was just four when she appeared alongside her actor father Jon Voight in cult Shampoo and Being There director Hal Ashby’s Lookin’ To Get Out, but her part was cut and the film only had a limited release.

Ashby re-cut the film before his death in 1988 and his family and Voight, who starred in the director’s Coming Home, have worked tirelessly to get the new film a release.

Voight, who also co-wrote the film, says, “We had all sorts of drama in the making of it and in the final stages, Hal was not able to finish the film, so there was some damage done to the film and it came out in a crippled form. Unfortunately, nobody saw the film in a proper state.”

The actor had no idea Ashby had re-cut the film - and handed the finished product to film archivists at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). Voight only learned of the existence of the director’s cut when he was approached by Ashby’s biographer Nick Dawson two years ago (07).

Dawson introduced the actor to Lee Ashby McManus - the daughter Ashby never met - and she revealed Lookin’ To Get Out was her favourite film, because she felt sure Jolie’s role at the end of the movie was based on her.

Voight tells NewsBlogRadio.com, “She said, ‘I think the little girl at the end, who was played by Angelina Jolie… was me.’ I thought about it and I said, ‘It is very possible it was you.’ I remember discussions we had and it was supposed to be a little boy, and Hal wanted a little girl.”

The Oscar winner is thrilled the film will eventually be seen as his director friend intended: “It’s a big deal to me… I like this film very, very much.”

The director’s cut of Lookin’ To Get Out, which also features Ann Margaret and Rocky star Burt Young, will debut at the Sarasota Film Festival in Florida next month (Apr09), ahead of the movie’s DVD release on 20 June (09).

From Contact Music

I’ve seen some older interviewers with Voight where he’s talked about how Lookin’ To Get Out is one of his favorite films. Really though, I wonder if Voight actually remembers much of his career in the 1970s and 1980s. He was a pretty heavy drug abuser, and it wouldn’t surprise me if that part of his career is a blur. Still, seeing Angelina Jolie’s first film performance would be interesting.

Written by Kaiser

Bookmark and Share

Posted in Angelina Jolie, Jon Voight

Credit: WENN.com featured links
- Diet secrets from Jessica Alba's nutritionist [Hollywood Life]
- Hef's twins have beautiful hair [D-Listed]
- The Twilight kids: more "Hills" than cool [Lainey Gossip]
- Ellen premieres on Idol tonight [Popeater]
- Cute photos of Anna Paquin and Steven Moyer exercising [Popsugar]
- JWoww wants bigger implants [Celebslam]
- Look at Handy Manny now [Go Fug Yourself]

15 Responses to “Angelina Jolie’s ‘lost’ first film will get director’s cut re-release”

  1. Dates just don’t add up there. If she was 4 years old while making this movie it had to be 1979 not 1982. And 2009 is 27 years from 1982 not 17.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  2. ND - I was wondering about that too, but I think Angelina really was four when they filmed it, and the film was “lost” for a few years (couldn’t find a distributor), then it was released in 1982.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  3. I find the whole blurb confusing. Agree about the dates too. I sometimes wonder who it was that Voight left Angelina’s mother for (I understand the children were quite young at the time), and also wonder whether ‘that time in her life’ has painful memories for her . . . . .
    She is so sweet in this excerpt. And Voight does seem genuinely adoring of her, his daughter.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  4. Well, in Hollywood lying about one’s age is a common thing.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  5. Hmm. Odd. Either the film itself took 3/4 yrs to make (unlikely but not impossible) or, as you say, kaiser, it sat around for a few years before being released. But she really doesn’t sound older than 4 here.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  6. Damn, Shiloh looks like her.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  7. I hear you, Anna. Her and Shiloh look so much alike.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  8. I thought Shiloh looked like BP, now I understand why people claim she looks like JV.

    Cute, but I’d never have thought the girl in the clip was AJ. Just shows how much people can change w/ age.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  9. oh my… cute! and shes blond like shiloh. who would have thought that that sweet little girl will grw up wild, sexy,beautiful and now become one of the most famous hollywood stars and become a mother of beautiful rainbow kids!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  10. That was cute. She has been acting for a long time.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  11. Oh my…she was so cute!!!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  12. IMDB says the movie was filmed in 1980 but not released until 1982. Jolie was born on June 5th, 1975 therefore, if this was filmed anywhere between Jan.1st - June 4th, 1980, she would definitely have been 4 years old at the time.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  13. Wow and I thought Shiloh looked like her dad but I was so wrong she is identical as her mother. So cute!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  14. Las vegass, nevada..

    hahahaha! her voice so cute!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

Leave a Reply

Celebitchy aims to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy

Use the "Report this comment as spam or abuse" link to ask the moderators to delete a comment if it's offensive. If your comment disappears, it has been eaten by the spam filter. Please e-mail cbcomments at gmail.com to get it retrieved.

Get an icon next to your name by signing up for a free Gravatar

 
 
 
Legal Disclaimer