Closing arguments in Phil Spector retrial call him “demonic maniac”

Spector deadlocked

Legendary music producer Phil Spector’s fate is now in the hands of yet another jury. Spector’s murder retrial isn’t quite the spectacle as his first trial, during which he showed up with a different, insane hair style every day, but the prosecutors in the case are going for the jugular anyway. The prosecutor characterized Spector as a deranged lunatic prone to violence against women – a man who has more than a normal fondness for guns and who considers himself above the law.

A prosecutor told a jury that Phil Spector’s history of violence against women was like a game of Russian roulette that ended with the shooting death of actress Lana Clarkson at his hilltop mansion.

Deputy District Attorney Truc Do urged jurors Monday in the music producer’s retrial to find Spector guilty of second-degree murder, not the lesser possibility of involuntary manslaughter. His first jury deadlocked 10-2 for conviction.

She referred in her closing argument to Spector as becoming “a demonic maniac” when he drank and “a very dangerous man” around women.

“This case is about a man who has had a history of playing Russian roulette with the lives of women,” she said. “Five women got the empty chamber. Lana got the sixth bullet.”

A ruling by Superior Court Judge Larry Paul Fidler which permitted testimony by five women in Spector’s past was perhaps the most controversial of both trials. All the incidents occurred between 1975 and 1995 but none resulted in guns being fired. All involved women who said Spector confronted them with guns when they tried to leave his presence.

Attorney Doron Weinberg was to present the defense argument Tuesday. The original case prosecutor, Alan Jackson, was to argue as well before the case goes to the jury Wednesday.

Weinberg is expected to say that the 40-year-old Clarkson, a down-on-her-luck actress in despair about her career, put the gun in her mouth and pulled the trigger six years ago. She was best known as the star of the 1985 cult film “Barbarian Queen.”

Do, who joined the prosecution team for the second trial, is well known for her expertise with electronic evidence displays. She dimmed the courtroom lights and illustrated every point with photos, PowerPoint displays of testimony excerpts and the video testimony of a now-dead woman who testified at Spector’s first trial in 2007.

Do spoke briefly about blood spatter evidence which she said proved that Clarkson could not have shot herself, but the bulk of her argument concerned two aspects of the case: the testimony of the five other women and a chauffeur who testified that Spector told him: “I think I killed somebody.”

She cited evidence of Spector washing his hands and trying to wash off Clarkson’s bloody face after the shooting.

“He can wash his hands clean of her blood but he can’t wash them clean of her murder,” she said.

At the end of Do’s presentation, Weinberg moved for a mistrial, saying she had overstepped the bounds of pretrial rulings by the judge in attacking Spector’s character rather than focusing on trial evidence. The judge denied the motion.

Spector, 69, the legendary producer known for his “Wall of Sound” recording technique and his eccentric personality, sat staring straight ahead as the prosecutor spoke. His wife, Rachelle, and one of his sons were in the courtroom.

If convicted of second-degree murder he could draw a sentence of 15 years to life in prison. Involuntary manslaughter carries a penalty of two to four years behind bars.

[From Huffington Post]

I haven’t been following the second trial, but I did read about the first trial. Phil Spector is one scary dude- and I don’t just mean his hair! If the jury can’t agree this time, I think the prosecution is just going to have to let this go. This may be their last chance to get this verdict right.

Phil Spector is pictured on the last day of his first murder trial, shortly before the jury announced that they were deadlocked. Photo credits: Bauergriffin.
Spector deadlocked

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

16 Responses to “Closing arguments in Phil Spector retrial call him “demonic maniac””

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. gg says:

    I read May Pang’s first book about John Lennon trying to record in the studio with Spector and he was a nightmare.

  2. Tony says:

    Be careful who you go home with. Dance with the devil and you will pay the price.

  3. Ashley says:

    he looks like a weird-o

  4. Chiara says:

    I’d agree he is one scary dude. I haven’t followed this trial either. Wasn’t there a son or two that claimed … Daddy was a Dearest?

  5. british bitch says:

    A badassed mad ass. Bang the looney up.

  6. tasteT says:

    Just think a big eerie mansion decorated in 70’s motif…….and him and that hair…

  7. Legend says:

    What a travesty if they have to “let it go”. This guy is guilty, guilty, guilty. Plus its such an insult that he claims the victim killed herself.

  8. Ruffian9 says:

    …that hair, that ‘face’…..”demonic maniac” indeed

  9. Polkasox says:

    He looks like the cryptkeeper in a wig.

  10. Jamine says:

    sometimes i really wonder about the legal system. nobody can agree so lets just let a vicious murderer go. yep… that’s justice for you. Disgusting.

  11. Hieronymus Grex says:

    As my poli-sci professor once said, “The law is a system that ensures that theft, rape and murder remain the tools of the wealthy.”

  12. tigerlille says:

    If prosecutor’s didn’t attack the character of defendants, a lot of them would have little to say.

    Phil Spector has had the reputation of being insane and just plain mean for most of his career. But my God his musical technique was brilliant, which is what enticed John to work with him in the first place. When I see current photos of Phil Spector and Keith Richards, the term “vampire” always leaps to mind. They look like the living dead.

  13. raincoaster says:

    I followed the first quite closely, thanks to Dominick Dunne’s coverage in Vanity Fair among others. The second has sadly flown under my radar.

    I’ve spent some time on YouTube watching Lana Clarkson videos, and it’s really humanized the trial for me. She was a pretty charismatic actress, and the directors she worked with all liked her.

    I hope justice is done. But I don’t expect that it will be.

  14. Bailey says:

    Lana Clarkson was an unstable, reckless drama queen and probably shot herself while fooling around with the gun.

  15. j. ferber says:

    Wow, Bailey, that’s quite a statement to make. Cool, too, how you slam the victim and blame her for her own murder. Very smooth. In my heart, I believe California is unable to convict a celebrity of anything. So Specter will have to go out of state and kill another woman in order to be convicted. So sad.

  16. Dan says:

    Yeah Bailey, I’m sure that Lana Clarkson was sitting around with Phil SPector casually chatting and then, just out of the blue, said “Hey, do you have a loaded gun I could play with? I think I might want to kill myself.”

    God, the idiots that buzz around the internet never cease to amaze me.

    Anyone with an IQ over 25 knows what happened. Spector was drunk and thought he was in for some great sex with this hot blonde that he’d just picked up. When he figured out that she had no intention of screwing him, he flew into a rage and produced a gun, just like he’s done many times in the past when rejected by women. Only this time it went off. So the drunken little twerp staggers outside and, before he has a chance to think about it, blurts out to his driver “I think I just killed somebody.”

    It’s about as big a slam dunk murder conviction as it could be, save for having witnesses who actually witnessed the shooting.

    I hope the despicable little bastard gets anally-reamed on a regular basis by Manny, Ernesto, Leon, Joe Bob and all the other fun-loving boyz in the state pen.