Rachel Dolezal: people ‘don’t know what I’ve actually walked through & how hard it is’

Screen Shot 2015-06-17 at 7.05.26 AM_edited-1
Yesterday we heard from Rachel Dolezal, the former Spokane, WA NAACP president who posed as an African American woman for years. Dolezal used a combination of self tanners, fake hair and an invented backstory, complete with made up racist bigotry, to boost the claim that she was born as a black woman. She even claimed that a black man, a personal friend, was her biological father, when her father is in fact white, as is her mother. There’s more to this complicated story, with the crux being that the woman lies openly and seems to have sociopathic tendencies.

In her appearance on The Today Show yesterday, Dolezal portrayed herself as a victim of the media. She had a lot of long winded explanations and never apologized for her deception, nor did she apologize in her statement resigning from the NAACP. Dolezal had another, more in-depth interview yesterday, with Melissa Harris-Perry on MSNBC. She talked a good game, as we heard on The Today Show, but she rarely answered questions directly and instead gave lots of details which sounded embellished. You can read a transcript of the interview here and clips are here.

I’m not going to excerpt much from the interview, because to me it’s not what she said it’s what she didn’t say. She was entirely too slick, and I came away from this with the impression that she’s a charismatic con artist. Here’s Dolezal’s response to the questions of whether she’s a con artist. She didn’t sweat it at all, nor did she answer yes or no. She also talked around the issue of cultural appropriation, bringing it up without really addressing it.

On if she’s a con artist
I don’t think so, you know. I don’t think anything that I have done with regard to the movement, my work, my life, my identity, I mean, it’s all been very thoughtful and careful, sometimes decisions have been made for survival reasons or to protect people that I love. And all things included, when it boils down, the entire world could say stand down. But when it comes to being there for my kids, for my sister, I would never stand down on that.

It’s been hard for me to actually have the courage to be there for myself because my life and kind of my past, my journey, has been to be so heavily aware of the needs of other people in times to organize, strategize and advocate for and protect those interests. And so at this point, I’m kind of thrust into, you know, are you going to be there for yourself? Are you not? Are you going to back down, you know, stand down, stand up, what’s going to happen? And I’ve really kind of taken the personal and the organizational and in the last three days —

— OK. Here’s family, kids, NAACP, accountability, my students, all these things, my work. And here’s my family and here’s my — and then there’s me.

And what is in the big picture interest? And so my resignation yesterday, I really came to see that and I came from ultimately conversation with my oldest son, which, you know, he’s like (INAUDIBLE), I can’t — like now’s the time when.

On people being angry at her
They don’t know me. They really don’t know what I’ve actually walked through and how hard it is. This has not been something that just is a casual, you know come-and-go sort of identity you know, or an identity crisis. It’s something that I’ve paid away. And people have asked like, you know, I guess, go back to being white.

If you’re rejected by the black community, what do you do?

I’ll be me. I’ll be me because you know, I feel like at the same time, I never want to be a liability to the cause. And I take that very seriously in consideration there’s so much to process with sort of going from being celebrated as a black woman and loving how that feels by all the students that I mentor and like feeling like, oh, I can be me and they get me and I get them and we can talk about, you know, yes, you know, just Iggy Azalea and cultural appropriation and all these things. And it’s just — I teach (INAUDIBLE) culture classes, I teach black studies. I teach like seven of them.

[From MSNBC Transcript]

It’s a simple question: are you a con artist or not? The answer should be “yes” or “no”. Instead she claims that she doesn’t “think” she is and then goes into a long non-answer about how she’s “there for” her family and her job. It’s unclear what she even means, which seems to be typical of the way she speaks. She had a similar lengthy non-response to the question of why she sued Howard University.

Also in the interview, Dolezal claimed that she didn’t get paid for her position with the NAACP or for her role on the police accountability board. She also worked as a part time instructor for Eastern Washington University, which has since removed her profile from their website. It’s thought that her contract for next year will not be renewed.

Dolezal may have another option for employment now that she’s infamous for pretending to be a black woman. Radar online reports that she’s been offered at least two reality shows and is about to hire a publicist and agent. TLC should get right on that. I’ve heard they may have an opening in their schedule.

racheld3

racheld4

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

247 Responses to “Rachel Dolezal: people ‘don’t know what I’ve actually walked through & how hard it is’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Loopy says:

    Ok what is not being really mentioned is CRIMINAL Charges, will she not face any, at least for fraud???

    • Mispronounced Name Dropper says:

      Well George W Bush didn’t

    • PhenomenalWoman says:

      For what? Self-identifying in any particular way is not fraud. Unless anyone can prove that she actually obtained anything of value for pretending to be a black woman, there’s nothing to charge her with.

      • Tiffany27 says:

        Didn’t she lie to the police about harassment she faced that she created?

        I’m not going to go on a long rant about this because I’m sure its already been said, but there truly are no words to describe how pissed off I am at the support this woman is getting. She decided to become black ONLY after her attempt to sue Howard University failed. She maneuvered and forced her away into a space that she felt she deserved to be a part of (pushing actual WOC out of her way to do so) and we’re suppose to applaud this???? She did the most white privelege-y thing I can think of and is now reaping financial benefits for her massive and hurtful deception. F*ck her.

      • MrsB says:

        For filing false harassment charges. She claims she was sent racist mail and such threatening her, when in reality, she sent it to herself.

      • Nickt says:

        She falsely reported hate threats to the police. She also plagiarized artwork and then SUED Howard University for discrimination when they refused to show said plagiarized artwork in an student exhibition. I’m so tired of people acting as if being black was the only thing she lied about!

      • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

        She’s committed a lot of fraud.

        She created hate mail which she sent to herself and said she was being targeted for her race.

        She’s sued Howard University for discrimination against her for a race she now claims she never was.

        She’s been given job positions based on experiences she never had that put her in the public spotlight.

        She discriminated against her lighter skinned students while she was a teacher excluding some of them from class activities.

        The list goes on and I hope she gets sued till her eyeballs roll back in her head.

    • Neonscream says:

      Who did she defraud? Lying isn’t the same as fraud, not in the legal sense anyway. Discrimination is not fraud, then positions she held were either unpaid and/or the employer (for her teaching positions) would have to claim they wouldn’t have hired her if they’d known she was Caucasian which they’re not in a million years going to do. When she sued the university she was presenting as the “race” she claimed was being discriminated against AND she lost. Lying about having cancer is gross but not fraud unless you received money/benefit from someone for it. Plagiarism is not fraud, making false police reports is also not fraud, although it is a crime and if they prove she did that I suspect they’ll charge her.

      She may be mentally ill or just a total shite of a liar in a long con in black face but I can’t see any LEGAL fraud that has been committed.

      • oneshot says:

        what about the students in the classes she taught, to whom she recounted stories of her “experiences” as a “black woman”? It’s a pretty shitty set of lies to be feeding them.

      • sara says:

        Harris perry loves this girl. Listening to the 2 of them talk made my head hurt. They went around and around and ultimately talked about nothing. Lets not make this into something its not. She is a liar who greatly benefited from posing as black. If she didnt benefit..maybe id look at this more closely..but she built her whole adult life around it. Maybe her parents suck too..i dont care..bottom line this woman is a liar and not a good person.

      • PhenomenalWoman says:

        That’s what I tried to say above. There is no actionable legal fraud. And for the record, the police never said she filed false police reports; they simply could not prove that a crime had been committed. (But then again, the police also found that Chris Brown had not committed a crime when he stalked Karrueche, pounded on her door, and possibly broke her window). People say she mailed herself hate mail; but the reports said that the mail had no stamp. So someone could have walked up and put it in her mailbox.

        As to the lawsuit; I’ve sued for discrimination and also lost. The standard for those lawsuits are notoriously difficult to meet (I wonder why??) If what she said was true – i.e. that they withdrew her scholarship and told her “let your white relatives pay for your school” – then she had every right to sue.

        Dishonesty is one thing – and she has plenty of that – but to bandy about the word “fraud” is something else altogether.

      • Josephine says:

        False report to the police. Yes, it is a crime, and it’s punishable as it should be because it takes their time away from real crimes.

      • CatFoodJunkie says:

        Lying is different than fraud. She lied, tons, but she also defrauded many, many people. By definition, fraud is to commit deliberate deception for gain. She presented herself as a WOC, which she knew she wasn’t, and she gained from it (her part time position, with both the Commission (where she oversaw racial discrimination within the police force) and the University (where she taught African studies), which garnered her the NAACP position, or certainly raised her profile allowing her to acquire that position. Whether or not there was a financial gain is irrelevant to fraud… gain is gain in all senses – be it financial or social. The reasons why she pretended to be a WOC is the mystery — was she attracted to the drama that her claims (false or not) created? She somehow manages to attach herself to every possible female demographic: (cervical) cancer survivor, minority, victim of hate mail, rape survivor, single mother, victim of spousal abuse, and, when she was younger, a victim of discrimination…when at THAT time she self-identified as white (even though in her interviews she claims to have self-identified as a WOC from the age of 5). No doubt she’s an emotional mess in serious need of counseling, but i just can’t be convinced that she is innocent with true motives and yet somehow made a complete mess of her life in nearly every avenue, by happenstance. This woman, if you believe her, has the worst luck ever. Ultimately, my beef with her is that she has not suffered the consequences that true WOC have suffered, and in the old saying, she hasn’t walked even one mile in their shoes.

    • Sammi says:

      I sure hope so. All the criminal complaints she filed could certainly be interpreted as “nuisance complaints” and therefore an offense.

    • Aha says:

      Hey Sideshow Bob, we found your sister!

    • tabasco says:

      I’m not sure about criminal charges – – although just based on what I’m seeing others have said, it seems like if someone really wanted to go after her, mail fraud could be possible, and there’s the possibility of perjury charges. It seems likely that in her suit against Howard, that she would’ve at some point stated things under oath that aren’t true. I would imagine that there are plenty of documents out there – possibly related to her ID, any kind of insurance she has – where she lied about her race or whatever else and signed her name to it. That alone can get you into trouble.

      But, legal penalties don’t just consist of criminal charges – there is also the civil route. One can sue for all sorts of nifty things in civil tort law. I doubt any major organization would bother b/c she’s widely viewed as a wackjob, so not much reputational damage to Howard or similar.

      If I were her, I’d be more concerned about anything relating to state or federal government that’s been signed in these last years.

  2. Lara K says:

    People dont know what i have walked through. Mile after mile of my own bullshit! It has been such a hard journey!

    • Dani2 says:

      Lol exactly, she REALLY loves to play the role of the victim

    • Esmom says:

      Seriously. Such rambling non-answers. She’s is nearing Sarah Palin levels of word salad here.

      • Kitten says:

        SO much rambling to the point that I couldn’t understand anything she was saying.

      • EscapedConvent says:

        True. She’s almost babbling. Iggy Azalea?

      • JenniferJustice says:

        She’s got the glibs.

      • Tiffany :) says:

        So true. She had long enough to think about what she was going to say, I can’t believe she didn’t present something more well thought out.

        She seems like she might have serious emotional/mental issues, but based on her career I would have thought she would have an easier time with public speaking.

      • Esmom says:

        Tiffany, I think this is what unraveling looks like, she can’t even formulate her thoughts at this point since the lies have caught up with her. Why she is even trying is a mystery to me. Maybe she thinks we’ll still somehow buy what she’s been trying to sell.

      • JustCrimmles says:

        I came here to say Sarah Palin called, she wants her word salad back.

        I’m not a fan of how she is being blamed on liberals and our supposed fixation with race. 1) She is not some Frankenliberal created in a lab, by us, foisted onto the masses. 2) I don’t think race is the fixation, so much as equality for all, which is mostly for non whites, as they are still not afforded many of the same basic human rights others are. Which at this point in history, is pretty f#cking sad. Dolezal did this on her own, for whatever reason(s) that logically have shit to do with what side one is aligned with politically.

    • tracking says:

      Definitely true, but there is some very messed up stuff with her family–a troubled sister making molestation claims against a brother, Rachel somehow got custody of one of her brothers. I just want to know more about her background before condemning her, and wonder if this isn’t more of a mental illness issue than a straight-out lying situation.

      • Size Does Matter says:

        I read an article on Daily Mail about her background. Maybe true, maybe not. Bio brother has written a memoir about their childhood, claims dad and mom were religious fundies and very strict. This is the brother with molestation charges. Also Rachel alleged in divorce her ex-husband was abusive, forced sex acts.

        It seems to me like she’s kind of a permanent victim. Victim of weird white parents, victim of mean black husband, victim of racism as white woman in college, victim of racism/harassment/crime as black woman. How much of it is true? She totally plagiarized her artwork and seems to have fabricated the harassment claims. She did a presentation on managing her “black” hair which isn’t real. So how much of it is part of the con? I don’t doubt that she has some personality disorders but I also think she’s a calculating liar. She’s perfect for TLC.

      • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

        @Size

        Sad but true, when I saw the news about the molestation charges and abuse accusations about her ex-husband I doubted whether they were real or not. When you lie about everything and go to incredible lengths to lie…

      • tracking says:

        I agree with all of this, of course, but she did not make the molestation claims, her sister did. And she was awarded primary custody of two kids–in lieu of her ex-husband and her parents, respectively. What on earth could have precipitated transfer of custody from her parents to her? I’m not justifying her behavior, just think there is more to this story.

      • JenniferJustice says:

        I agree. Something about her strikes me as compulsive – the lying, the glibness, the continued self-victimizing, etc. Dr. Drew needs to get a panel together with this lady being the subject.

      • LizzyFizzy says:

        I was very critical of her and then a friend sent me this–her parents are allegedly followers of To Train Up a Child, the Pearl homeschooling/Quiverfull-type Christian discipline manual that advocates “blanket training” of infants and other horrors. If it’s true, her siblings are the adopted version of the Duggar kids. That might cause you all kinds of problems. Not that this absolves her of faking hate crimes, but it might explain why she is who she is today.

        https://homeschoolersanonymous.wordpress.com/2015/06/16/the-media-is-doing-exactly-what-rachel-dolezals-abusive-homeschooling-parents-want/

    • Shambles says:

      Lara, Esomom, Kitten– Right?!?!? I wish I could provide intelligent commentary, but I cannot understand one single thing she said. She speaks in such broken English that you’d think she was trying to pass as a Martian, not a black woman. All I got out of it was that she loved the way it felt to be “celebrated” as a black woman. I think she just admitted to doing it all for the attention without realizing it.

      • FLORC says:

        I’m not alone! I re-read her answers and still they were trailing thoughts. And none were a direct answer or justified explanation. Just stringing words together.

        Your last 2 sentences sum it up well for me too.

    • Maria A. says:

      Seriously! This woman is just itchin’ all over with issues. One doesn’t know where to begin, but man, she must really hate her parents – and possibly herself as well.

    • Liberty says:

      …exactly. Such a con.

    • Katie says:

      Exactly. She brought this on herself. And now instead of owning it, she’s still trying to blame blame blame.

  3. capepopsie says:

    I´m sorry, but I don´t Think this is good for anyone.
    Not really building up respect for her or her “cause”.

  4. Renee2 says:

    I read this good article on the Boston Globe yesterday that made some salient points on this matter and ended like this:

    ‘Finally, it is troubling that so many of us now know the name and story of Rachel Dolezal, a white woman who passed as black advocate, rather than the names of countless black women who occupy the front lines in the war against racism. Dolezal is a national phenomenon, but Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, and Opal Tometi, the activists who started the Black Lives Matter campaign, are scarcely recognized. Dolezal’s peculiar and sensational fall from grace have made her more recognizable than Rekia Boyd and Natasha McKenna, two black women among many who were killed by police with little national attention. Uncovering the truth about Dolezal is no substitute for speaking the names and telling the stories of true martyrs and warriors in the battle for social justice.’

    I really wish that this woman would go back under the rock that she came from.

    • Dani2 says:

      You are so right. One of the points many of her apologists like to use is the “she’s done so much for the black community” card and yet, they cannot name any of the women you’ve just named. It’s sad.

      • someone says:

        “She’s done so much for the black community” = I keep seeing this but no where has anyone ever given a concrete answer to what she has done for the black community other than stir up controversy via lawsuits and unsubstantiated hate crime accusations

      • Dani2 says:

        @Someone That’s what I would like to know as well, but Keri Hilson in particular used that excuse to defend her. I’m still waiting on the receipts though.

      • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

        Keri Hilson and Raven Symone.

        Keri Hilson, which I guess she doesn’t plan on ever having a proper comeback because her backlash was swift and strong on trying to defend this woman.

        Raven…so predictable. This girl grew up to be so deluded and empty-headed.

      • Knittle says:

        I’ve actually met Rachel, and I tend to think she’s mentally ill. I don’t think she became a black woman to make money because she was obsessed with blackness when I knew her as a 19-year-old. Having known her once, I do feel sympathy for her. That said, I definitely think it was wrong for her to deceive others about her ethnicity, but I simply don’t feel angry with her. I wrote about my experiences with Rachel here: http://racerelations.about.com/od/diversitymatters/fl/I-Met-Rachel-Dolezal-When-She-Was-Still-a-White-Woman.htm

      • MaggieOwns says:

        Knittle, that you for sharing your experience with Rachel. What an interesting read! I really appreciate (and agree with ) your perspective.

      • Kitten says:

        “Even anti-racist whites are occasionally told to check their white privilege and that such privilege will prevent them from truly knowing what it’s like to be the target of racism. Masquerading as a black woman allowed Dolezal to both avoid the kind of suspicion that well-meaning whites sometimes face from people of color and the psychological warfare that blacks persistently face in a white supremacist world. Because of her deception, despite her good works as an activist and academic, both blacks and antiracist whites should feel betrayed.”

        Thanks for sharing, Knittle. Very interesting read.

    • Esmom says:

      It’s really sad. I think crawling under a rock is about the only place now where she can realistically go. Except maybe TLC, which would be awful because she’d stay in the public eye.

    • Cynthia says:

      +1

    • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

      Absolute truth. Rachel stole those women’s voices and stories so she could push herself into the spotlight. It worked well too, now some morons even sympathize with her and are creating new words to justify her criminal actions.

      • Lahdidahbaby says:

        I agree with every word you said, Eternal. It’s very hard for me to understand why so many are excusing her and feeling great sympathy for her. From where I stand, she engaged in a well-planned and deliberate deceit – hell, let’s just call it what it is: a hoax. To my mind she did it all for attention, sympathy, public acknowledgement, self-aggrandisement, and maybe also out of some desire to stick it to her parents. That makes her, to my mind, an opportunistic, ambitious, and possibly vengeful attention wh@re. Oh yes, and a compulsive liar – her speech patterns are those of someone speaking nonsense syllables: not a single coherent sentence emerges from her cliché-strewn speech. And most of all she is a thief who stole and recycled authentic black experience as if it were her own, using it to garner attention, praise, and sympathy. That is without a doubt the very worst thing she did, perpetrating emotional fraud in her disguise as a black woman, allowing students to open up to her and trust her.

    • sensible says:

      I am white person, but my god I am annoyed at this idiot from my own POV, but I reckon if I was black I would be livid. How dare she steal other people’s culture, take advantage of scholarships etc meant for others, who the eff does she think she is? I thought Mr Super white privilege Chet Haze was bad…but this woman takes the cake.

    • Ahot says:

      This so much!

      A white woman chose to live in black face for years, while trying to tell black folks how to live their truth. We all need to let that sink in.

    • delorb says:

      Don’t know why that’s so surprising to anyone. The media has been doing this stuff for decades. Scores of children went missing in Atlanta and no one cared for a long time. One girl went missing in Aruba and its splashed all over our teevees.

      Now we have this sociopath lying her way through various interviews. Never taking responsibility because sociopaths never do. And the media is doing what they always do. Shining a spotlight on a white woman. She’s going to get a book deal and a made for TV movie staring Helen Hunt or Leelee Sobieski and/or a housewife from Atlanta.

    • E.M. MAXX says:

      Wow ….perfectly put !!!!!!

  5. tifzlan says:

    I don’t understand anything she is trying to say. A lot of words for paragraphs of nothing. Why couldn’t she advocate for the cause without the lies? That would’ve been just as powerful and we/she wouldn’t be in this mess today.

    • LadyMTL says:

      My thoughts exactly. I don’t understand why she couldn’t just say “I identify as black but my ancestry is white. I apologize to everyone who I upset / hurt / offended as that was not my intention. I hope that this story will not take away from the fact that the NAACP is an important organization and they do great work…” and etc etc.

      Why is that so hard? Oh yeah, because now she’s into the attention and she wants a book deal and a TV show and so on. If she apologizes and actually tells the truth then the drama is over. This woman gets on my last nerve.

      • PhenomenalWoman says:

        I really like that statement. It would assuage a lot of the “hurt” that people seem to be feeling over this woman.

      • belle de jour says:

        I agree with you & with PhenomenalWoman.

        Not defending her actions in any way… but I suspect that her identity/ego is so fragile – built upon a complicated system of lies interwoven with lies – that she would shatter into a thousand fragments if she truly recognized what she has done. My other guess is that she could have been severely traumatized from childhood, and went to outrageous extremes both to distance and reinvent herself – to deny her abusers were *her* abusers, to deny them their very identity – and to seize the power by making up new ones for them and for herself. She very well may have been one kind of victim who thought she would be heard (or gain importance, or regain power) by ‘taking action’ to pose as other sorts of victims.

        The gibberish, imo, is because I doubt whether she’s ever told a cohesive or comprehensive narrative even to herself in anything longer than ‘incidents’ or examples; as I said earlier, I think this has been a step-by-step, lie-by-lie house of cards she’s constructed as time went on.

      • Knittle says:

        Belle de Jour, I completely agree with you. I think Rachel chose to be black for psychological reasons rather than to profit from the black experience. I feel compassion for her because I think she has a mental health issue.

    • *North*Star* says:

      Because it all about her.

      Every time they asked a question, she swings whatever answer back to her. I don’t need to read the rest of the interview to see how ‘me focused’ she is.

      Mock question: What do you see as the global impact of the earth warming so quickly?

      Mock answer: It’ll make it so much harder for me, as a black woman, to cool off.

      • anon321 says:

        She has nerve – in the third paragraph she describes the conversations with her black students about ” …Iggy Azalea and cultural appropriation.”

      • Dana m says:

        Obviously, she hates herself. Something went wrong during her childhood for sure.

        She is a pathological liar,has some sort of mental illness, can’t take accountability and apologize, it’s all about her, she is the victim ya’ll, very manipulative, loves to file lawsuits, trying to morph into someone else….uhhhh wait…..Hello, Leann Rimes, is that you?

    • JenniferJustice says:

      Actually, having a white person with the NAACP defending African-Americans would do so much more good than this idiot pretending to be black. I still say she is mentally ill – a sociopath, compulsive liar, I’m sure more. I would love to see a psychiatrist’s analysys of this one.

      • CatFoodJunkie says:

        I agree completely! Were she a white woman doing ride-alongs with the police department to monitor and advise re race relations and discriminatory behavior, her word would carry so much more weight. Not because it’s white v. black, but because i think POC oftentimes get labeled, unfairly, as “looking out for their people” which gets translated, somehow, to them lying or giving false testimony.

      • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

        Sadly it’s been confirmed several times just this year alone that when video evidence is missing white testimony is valued over black. She actually gave up the power to do good by masquerading as another race and made her efforts about her twisted fantasy world.

  6. Birdie says:

    Con artist.

    • Loopy says:

      Can’t wait for the life time movie.

      • Neelyo says:

        Oh you know it’s coming.

      • PhenomenalWoman says:

        I’d actually watch it and read her book. I would love to be able to walk in someone else’s shoes for a day. This woman has done it for a decade. I do not support her lies, etc., but from a social experiment perspective, it’s fascinating. Maybe that’s what she should have said, that it was a social experiment.

      • Maria A. says:

        Maybe John Waters will tackle her in something? That would be satirically awesome.

  7. Elfie says:

    She’s a compulsive lying, personality disordered sociopath and I don’t think that there is any mental health treatment that can cure her. This woman has made nasty, malicious false allegations against innocent people. Lies have consequence. False accusers cast doubt on real victims and they should be punished by the law with the same sentence a convicted person would serve for offences alleged.

    She is not black, she’s a racist in costume, mimicking ‘blackness’ to exploit it to serve her obsession with attention for victimhood. She has no victimhood so she makes it up. She doesn’t care about people of colour, she exploits their very real issues for her own gain. If it wasn’t race she’d be posing as a disabled person or some other vulnerable person. This is all about her and her desire for attention as a victim. At everybody else’s expense.

    • Dani2 says:

      “She is not black, she’s a racist in costume, mimicking ‘blackness’ to exploit it to serve her obsession with attention for victimhood. She has no victimhood so she makes it up. She doesn’t care about people of colour, she exploits their very real issues for her own gain. If it wasn’t race she’d be posing as a disabled person or some other vulnerable person. This is all about her and her desire for attention as a victim. At everybody else’s expense.”

      Totally agree, she is a manipulative and attention-hungry liar.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      I have to agree. I think that underneath it all, she’s sick and needs help, but it’s hard to have sympathy for someone living such a despicable life. Especially when she tries to justify what she has done by claiming it was somehow beneficial to “the cause.” Maybe it was at times, but that’s not why she did it.

      • Kitten says:

        Agree with all the comments here and I have zero sympathy for this woman, regardless of what mental issues she may have.

      • FLORC says:

        GNAT
        I think she reached the point of no return as a defense mech. To now admit to herself the years of lies would be extremely damaging. Her mind could be subconsciously protecting her from this truth and from fully healing.
        I have some sympathy, but the majority of her fear and pain is of her of design. Coming to terms with that might not be as simple as admitting fault.

    • Mata says:

      Well said. I’m surprised I haven’t seen many things talking about her obsession with being a victim. Even under her white identity, she sued Howard U. for discrimination. Her pathological lies all involve her being a victim in some way. She’s a very sick woman that has done a lot of damage.

    • Nicolette says:

      Your comment nailed it and I agree with everything you said.

    • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

      You hit the nail on the head perfectly with the racist in costume bit, as far as she’s concerned her black origin story was one of poverty and stereotypes.

    • cheryl says:

      Agree totally.

    • Pinky says:

      I too agree with all of this. She wants to be either a hero or victim–any kind of attention is fine, as long as she gets all of it.

    • What was that says:

      I agree wholeheartedly
      Is she Munschausens by proxy do you think ?
      I don’t understand why your TV stations are giving her what is called here,’The oxygen of publicity’
      She has been found out in her lies and will continue to dig herself in with more lies
      I think she will twist everything to her and it is sad for her son ,as no doubt she will be given her own reality show…

      • JenniferJustice says:

        Yes – Muschausens is what I thought too. Wondering about her children/child. How many children does she have and how old are they? I ask because she said her older son played a role in her divulging her true identity. If he’s old enough to form deep thoughts on that, it means her children have been having to live her lie too and lie for her – even if lying by omission. What a horrible thing to do to your children – and all in the name of attention and sympathy. I feel no sympathy for her. I suspect she is a sociopath – all about herself.

    • jaye says:

      Didn’t she also lie about having cancer? I think I read that, but I can’t remember where.

      • LL says:

        She lied about lots of stuff. Having cancer. Growing up in South Africa when she’d never been there. Having to hunt her own food with a bow and arrow. It’s remarkable.

    • senna says:

      In reading her statement, in which she uses the word “me” eleventy times, she comes off as self-centered enough that it trips my narcissistic spectrum radar. You can’t diagnose someone as a narcissist online, but several things show traits of narcissism: she only thinks about the world in relation to herself (ie. my students, my work, using a possessive voice as if they are her accomplishments, loving how it feels to be a black woman and celebrated as a person); she thinks somewhat magically about her black identity (ie. if she “struggles” and accomplishes good things then it’s not a problem that she’s lying), and doesn’t seem to fully understand how others would have a problem with her fake black identity even though she can criticize others for doing the same, like Iggy Azalea.

      She’s at least got some sort of personality disorder, is a con-artist, and is unapologetic.

  8. Jayna says:

    She talks in circles, answering nothing, deflecting.

    • GingerCrunch says:

      Yep. I noticed what seemed like a lot of justifications in those answers. So yeah, con artist.

  9. Jackson says:

    L…OL….and what the hell did she even say??? Good job recapping that nonsense, CB. Ugh. This woman.

  10. goofpuff says:

    wow I don’t know where to start….is she talking about how hard it was to keep her lie hidden and fabricate a whole backstory and keep lying? I haven’t really heard why she did it or that she is even sorry for the damage she is doing to her cause and the people she fooled.

  11. Lozface says:

    I am lost for words with this.

    It reminds me of a recent incident here in Australia, Belle Gibson. She claimed to have survived terminal cancer through clean eating and built a health & wellness brand off the back of this. Being paid lots of money in the process, some of which was promised to charity – but never made it there. It’s since been uncovered she never had cancer and faked the entire story. She then tried to claim she lied because of her horrific childhood, but that has since been refuted by her ‘estranged’ mother. She’s a patholigal liar just like this story. It’s shocking. She hasn’t faced any fraud charges either and she’s ripped off up to $300,000!
    There is nothing admirable about these women at all. They could’ve done good things without the lies. They don’t care who they hurt or decieve in the process.

    • Lindy79 says:

      I read about that. Do you think fraud charges will eventually happen? There was talk about relatives of people who had died as a result of buying into her “this will cure your cancer” mentality suing for damages. Between that and, as you said, the 300k there surely is an open/shut case for fraud charges.

      I just wish this woman would go away now, stop giving her the attention she craves and honestly any network that gives this person a show (about what exactly??) should be ashamed. As others have so eloquently put above, the real heroes are being ignored while this con artist nutbar is getting international attention and feeding her obvious twisted victim complex.

      • Lozface says:

        She certainly doesn’t deserve any more attention. She doesn’t deserve a TV show at all. How about a show on those out there legitimately fight for their cause.

        I really don’t think Belle will face charges, although she should. I really hope people sue her though. To make claims like she did is beyond irresponsible and was life threatening. So sad.

  12. Juluho says:

    The woman is a total grifter. She almost had me beliving in transracial or racial confusion until I read excerpts from an interview on Jezbel, she states there is NO WAY to prove her parents are her parents and NO WAY to disprove.
    Wtf? Like a DNA test? GRIFTER

    • Nicolette says:

      I think at this point people just let anything fall out of their mouths and if it sticks like a piece of spaghetti thrown at the wall so be it, and if not oh well. Doesn’t seem to matter how preposterous a thing it may be, how far out there or how absurd.

    • Knittle says:

      @Juluho I’ve met Rachel and a number of other white people who identify with black culture because they’ve grown up with blacks, have black family members, etc. These people know they’re white but don’t identify with whiteness. I don’t approve of Rachel’s deception, but race is certainly a construct just like gender is. Using that argument, is it not possible to say that people can be both transgender and trans racial? Melissa Harris-Perry argued that she thinks there should be another category for blackness to honor those people who are black by “achievement,” and I agree: http://racerelations.about.com/od/diversitymatters/fl/Rachel-Dolezal-Scandal-Sparks-Transracial-Debate.htm

      • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

        Black by achievement…

        …so is the achievement actually treating POC like human beings?

      • Dani2 says:

        Black by achievement?

        *closes window*

        I’m officially done. Deuces.

      • Mare says:

        There’s a difference between identifying with black culture and actually claiming to be black.

      • Nicole says:

        No…just no.
        What is it that people don’t understand? You want our culture, our music, our poetry, style all of which traces back through centuries of our culture…many of which calls back to traditions adopted during slavery. Yet bring up unfair treatment, police brutality, the school to prison connection and all the sudden…crickets. When that isn’t the case maybe we can talk…otherwise you can miss me with that “black by achievement” BS. Because on any other day its no achievement to wake up in my black skin.

      • JenniferJustice says:

        Sure there are lots of white people who identify with black culture because of where they grew up and who they grew up with, but they do not pretend they are indeed black nor do they claim to be black, lie on forms about their race to get certain jobs, make false racism and discrimination claims all while in black face. That’s crazy and there is no defense other than mental illness. Most of us do not believe she did this to further any cause or even because she identified more with black people than she did with white people. It seems increasingly clearer that she did this for attention and sympathy. I suspect she did this for the game of it because she strikes me sociopathic and that’s what sociopaths do – toy with people and enjoy tricking them because it makes them feel they are smarter. They aren’t smarter – normal people are simply trusting and don’t assume they are being duped. Why can’t white people who fight for other races’ causes simply be deemed good people by virtue? Labeling someone black by achievement seems highly offensive to black people and I’m a white person feeling this.

      • LL says:

        People seem to forget that gender=/= sex. Or to misuse the word ‘gender’ when they actually mean the word ‘sex’.

        Sex is whether you’re biologically/physically male or female and has nothing to do with how you identify.
        Gender is whether you are psychologically male or female and has nothing to do with your genitals or chromosomes.

  13. grabbyhands says:

    It is a pretty damn embarrassing state of affairs when a white woman pretending to be a black woman, gets a more respect than an actual black woman. Especially when WOC are already marginalized in this country.

    I have no doubt that we will all be seeing her in a reality show or two soon, after she gets done doing her tour of talk shows. It makes me rage to see her up there soaking up the attention and smirking, basically being rewarded, after lying so much and continuing to lie.

    • Esmom says:

      I’m raging right there with you. The media attention on her just needs to stop at this point.

    • Cynthia says:

      Exactly!

    • MrsB says:

      I wish they would stop covering this mess because she so obviously loves it. She’s not ashamed at all. It makes me ragey as well. But, don’t confuse attention with respect. As far as I can tell, she is a laughingstock. Nobody I’ve seen is taking her seriously. Hopefully, her 15 minutes will run out soon.

    • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

      Exactly. Rachel will laugh all the way to the bank in her black face because she called this country for exactly what it is.

    • QQ says:

      Grabby I’m with you, I’m pissed, livid that this foolish so and so is even getting attention and over this word-salad-whitesplanation-Parsing-ass-Lower-tier-Kardashian-disease (Yeah I said It) fraudulent-pathological-victim-vapid-ass-counterfeit-reverse-imitation-of-life stupid ass chick

      • lisa says:

        bless you

        im tired of people telling me “she might be ill” and “she really lived as a black woman for 10 yrs so she knows their struggles” and “who did it really hurt.”

    • JenniferJustice says:

      She will get her just deserves. She may be getting attention, but it isn’t positive attention and I can’t imagine she won’t have some type of charges filed against her – for false police reports or false allegations at least. We have to be patient. This isn’t something that’s already on the books in terms of how to handle. She created a new type of crime that authorities will have to create polity and laws about. She can have her movie and book deal. Any profits will be yanked as soon as those she alleged discriminated against her sue her for every penny and future penny she will ever have.

  14. Neelyo says:

    Oh god, just go away!

  15. Kiddo says:

    This woman reminds me of Casey Anthony and Jodi Arias (sp?) in her adherence/commitment to the lies. Thankfully, she hasn’t killed anyone.

    • BearcatLawyer says:

      That we know of.

    • Nicolette says:

      Yes! The level of narcissism and deceit is incredible. Watching Casey Anthony calmly telling lie after lie to investigators without even hesitating was beyond belief. Everything pointed to her killing her child and she continued to deny everything while making up ridiculous scenarios and even going so far as to fabricate a nanny, without showing any visible signs of being nervous. And Jodi Arias, cold blooded vicious murderer trying to make herself the victim. I bet all these women will be subjects for mental health students to study for years to come.

      • Kiddo says:

        They both enjoyed the attention, too, even though it was derived from (obviously) bad press. There has to be some kind of (or multiples, thereof) personality disorder below the surface.

    • Red32 says:

      YES! That is exactly who she reminds me of. Initially Casey Anthony claimed she was working at her Universal Studios job when her daughter disappeared. The police found out she didn’t work there. They brought her to a Universal Studios and she said she “lost my badge” and walked up and down the hallways of a building looking for her office before the cops were like “um, we already know you don’t work here.”

      Same as this woman. They show her her Jan Brady-looking school picture and she’s like “well we don’t KNOW that those white people who raised me are my biological parents.” What?!?!?

    • MinnFinn says:

      I wonder if more false identities will be uncovered. This woman for some reason reminds me of Leonardo DiCaprio’s character in the movie Catch Me If You Can.

    • JenniferJustice says:

      She is a sociopath if not a psychopath. Not all psychopaths are violent. They just take advtantage of people and have no problem scheming their way to their own idea of success. Knowing she has children who had to lie for her says it all in my mind.

  16. Cynthia says:

    Ugh, why is she even given a platform in first place? The fact that she’s going to make money out of this makes me so angry.
    Being a Black woman is not a performance piece, she deserve all the dragging she got these day on social media.

  17. Eleonor says:

    I am not a psyochologist, but I think this woman has a serious mental issue and needs professional help.
    I think giving her all this attention is wrong, because it could seem to her like a reward for what she’s done.

    • Angie T says:

      Agreed. She’s sick but we really need to stop giving her attention. It’s just giving her exactly what she wants.

  18. Kitten says:

    I don’t understand..wtf would her reality TV show be about? I mean, shouldn’t her career be shot to shit now that she’s been outed as a liar and a con artist? It’s not like she can keep pretending to be black. Ugh. I’m done commenting on this because I don’t want to give this woman any more attention.

    • Kiddo says:

      TLC. nuff said

      • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

        Yup. They seem to love pedophiles and/or con artists. Rachel will be rewarded for this nonsense.

    • Esmom says:

      You make a good point. What possible angle could a show take? She’s really hit rock bottom. Alicia Head, the fake 9/11 survivor, at least had the good sense to slink gracelessly out of the life she created and into obscurity, which is why I think so many people haven’t heard of her. I think Dolezal should strive for the same, to have fewer people know about her, not more.

    • I Choose Me says:

      You’re right Kitten. From now on I will make it a point not to click on a single article about this woman in the hopes that she’ll stfu and go away.

  19. Jayna says:

    I bet she’s negotiating a big book deal as we speak.

  20. Crumpet says:

    I think it’s time to stop giving her attention. I honestly think she has mental health issues, and she hope she gets help. But everything there is to say about her and what she has done has already been said. There are much more interesting worthwhile things to talk about.

  21. Sandy123 says:

    I’m pretty sure a con artist wouldn’t admit to actually being one. To do so would ruin the con, so…

    • Blue says:

      True but I also think that apart from being a con artist this woman has serious mental health issues. She has kept up this con that she is African American for so long why stop now when she is getting all this media attention. That said I t still think she is batshit cray cray.

  22. poppy says:

    as I said yesterday, she’s nothing but an opportunist.
    mentally ill? it must be nice to pick and choose when the illness has an impact, positive or negative.
    when she can’t manipulate things to her benefit she moves on to the next con. 100% grifter.

  23. The Eternal Side-Eye says:

    The only thing Rachel did for black people was shine a big light onto how easy it is to disrespect and use us.

    She probably will get a reality show, and a book deal, and a few more padded interviews. She’ll answer dodgy question after dodgy question and when asked point blank about her hair give a conspiring smirk to her interviewer and say, “Well since you’re YOU”. She’s what? Oh that’s right, a black woman, and now Rachel can call herself one and pretend to her hearts content.

    People will make excuses for her, they’ll make up new definitions, they’ll pretend it’s flattering and that she’s done so much and say, “Hey let her identify as black” then they’ll go about their business of letting her use and manipulate what little means of assistance this country has provided for POC while young black boys get shot and young black girls are thrown to the ground in swimsuits and sat on by police officers.

    For that alone she gets a gold star for exposing what it is to be truly black in this country.

    • renee28 says:

      Yes. The fact that someone who has lied, plagiarized and conned her way through life is being coddled just shows how little value people place on black lives. Even in this thread you have people giving her a pass because she might have had a tough childhood or she might have some mental problems. Black people aren’t afforded those luxuries. No one cares what type of adversity they might have faced. She’s playing dress up as a black woman yet she’s still benefiting from white privilege.

      And it’s frustrating that someone like Rachel can take some of the few opportunities black students have, like scholarships, to get ahead. She always has the option of going back to being white. Black students don’t. If they start losing scholarships and ultimately jobs to the Rachels of the world; we’re going to have more people falling through the cracks.

      • Kiddo says:

        I don’t know if you were referencing my comments, but suggesting that someone might have a personality disorder is not a pass or coddling, even though these conditions do fall under mental health issues. Murderers and criminals also can have personality disorders that, through their behavior and actions, often place them in prison. The type and the extent of the disorder, as well as any comorbidities, would determine how (un) treatable or how dangerous someone can be. She latched on to a persona and identity which offered her some glory, it would seem. She could probably slip into some other identity if she hadn’t been stopped/exposed. It would be easy enough for her to change appearance and slip into some other entirely different white person identity. The fact that she had relatively little fear about being caught, and still lies, or makes it up as she goes along, would strongly suggest that she has some level of Cluster B disorder.

        The same type of individual, in different circumstances, might steal an actual living person’s identity rather than crafting a new one up one herself. But she was successful at the front, so she built on that.

      • belle de jour says:

        “No one cares what type of adversity they might have faced.”

        Nice blanket statement! Because someone says or notices A about one situation, then baseless B assumption about their attitudes towards a general situation must be concluded? Faulty logic + false assertion = weakening any point you may have wished to make.

        I also question your assessment that people are “giving her a pass” merely because they might be interested in trying to understand what may have motivated her in the first place.

        It is quite possible for well-meaning, aware (and justifiably judgmental) people to hold more than one thought and viewpoint in mind – simultaneously – while evaluating & discussing the impact and intention and causes behind her actions. But I reject that it must be relegated to a simplistic construct of ‘If A, then B.’

      • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

        Well said Renee.

    • Ellen says:

      There needs to be a #cutracheloff campaign. Seriously. She’s had two shots to tell her story, she’s a pathological liar and the message needs to be sent loud and clear that her book, tv show or future appearances won’t be watched.

  24. Solsolito says:

    As a biracial woman (I am half Dutch and half West-Indian), all I can say is that there is something seriously broken about this women. What she is ultimately doing is diminishing the experience of all women of colour. How dare she? Supporting people of colour does not mean you have to co-opt the race outright. If she had altruistic tendencies, they are lost in the deluge of dishonesty, manipulation, and yes, racism.
    Not only is she a con artist (if she is such an academic, she would realise that she is the very definition of one), she is also a closet racist. Wearing “black face” was offensive during the Vaudevillian era, and it is certainly no less repugnant now. What I find most distressing is that the only repercussion of her dalliance in playing “black” is possible disdain from of those she tried so desperately to be a part, and a reality show (the bastion of society’s pariahs it seems).
    I wish I could say I was angry about the entire situation. I can’t remove my skin tone to fit better in with the status quo (nor would I). However, this con artist has demonstrated that evidently it’s as easy as wearing fake hair, tanner, and speaking with an intonation. No, if anything, I pity her and those she has hurt with her subterfuge. She can’t wash off the taint of dishonesty like her fake tanner.

  25. Livealot says:

    Enough!

  26. j9 says:

    I can imagine that living your life as a conniving liar is very difficult. Eye roll

  27. FingerBinger says:

    It’s disappointing that Melissa Harris Perry was even entertaining this woman. I watched it and she was really easy on her and basically held her hand.

    • Robin says:

      You weren’t surprised by that, were you? Melissa Harris-Perry is a joke. Of COURSE she was going to let this con artist skate.

      • delorb says:

        Melissa is far from a joke. Jeez. She has spoken truth to power in the past. Something that shouldn’t be dismissed because she didn’t ask the questions you would have liked. This liar, grifter, sociopath wasn’t going to answer the tough questions no matter WHO was asking them.

    • Layday says:

      Yeah it was disappointing that Melissa Harris Perry couldn’t get past her own personal biases to not call this woman on her crap and be an objective interviewer. MHP kept talking about Black culture’s preoccupation with policing the boundaries of race on all her shows to justify why it was dangerous to not accept Rachel because she wants to be Black, going on and on about a transracial narrative. Um Black people didn’t create the boundaries of race. They were imposed upon us e.g. the one one drop rule and other laws that were designed to bestow arbitrary definitions of Blackness upon us. I think someone like Melissa Harris Perry who’s biracial with a White mother as she mentioned may have had her Blackness questioned and is mistakenly conflated that with what is happening to Rachel. It isn’t and her continued defense of Rachel makes me sideeye her. Her defending Rachel as if it’s somehow a defense of her own Blackness makes me think she doesn’t understand the issue in itself.

  28. bettyrose says:

    Somewhere BART Simpson is very nervous, cuz Sideshow Bob is back in town.

  29. Mila says:

    she actually wanted people to boycott Exodus for casting white actors as africans.

    i mean how can you say this without breaking face when you are doing the exact same thing?

    she even went as far and sued people based on discriminiation. i hope she has to face jail time.

    • Dani2 says:

      I saw some screenshots of her Facebook page in which she criticised black men for preferring white women over black women, she is so deluded and strange.

      • Jayna says:

        Wrong place. Sorry.

      • Cran says:

        That is EXTREMELY disturbing. She is a white woman who married a black man. She has a child with this man. She was not pretending she was a black woman then.

        I cannot begin to wrap my head around this woman’s ‘thoughts.’

        What kind of damage has she and will she inflict on this 13 year olds mind? Who is going to help him?

        I am so angry and nonplussed I am completely at a loss. She most definitely needs some deep, DEEP therapy.

    • Jayna says:

      Seriously? I think she’s a pathological liar who believes her own bull.

  30. meme says:

    Only in America would a complete fraud of a woman become rich and famous after she’s exposed. This whole story disgusts me.

  31. Robin says:

    The only thing this woman has walked through is piles of her own BS. Now she’s trying to ride the Jenner train, saying how “isolated” she has felt. She also claims to be bisexual. Guess she’s ticking ALL of the boxes.

  32. iheartjacksparrow says:

    The best stuff was from the interview with Savannah Guthrie. She said:

    I haven’t had a DNA test. There’s been no biological proof that Larry and Ruthanne are my biological parents.

    Reminding her that there’s a birth certificate listing them as her parents, she said:

    I’m not necessarily saying that I can prove they’re not. But I don’t know that I can actually prove they are. I mean, the birth certificate is issued a month and a half after I’m born. And certainly there were no medical witnesses to my birth.

    • Dani2 says:

      Good god, how is she even a professor? She is SO inarticulate and her arguments are so weak. I think her academic credentials need to be questioned as well.

      • Colette says:

        Eastern Washington University said she is not a Professor,she is a part time instructor

    • lisa says:

      this reminds me of when george costanza swore he had a house in the hamptons and drove susan’s parents all the way through long island because he couldnt admit he didnt.

  33. delorb says:

    We don’t know what she’s been through? Not only is she not black, but this bitch isn’t even female, because she has a huge set of balls.

  34. Miss M says:

    “I’ll be me”

    She has not been herself for years…

  35. cosmo says:

    For whatever reason, she identifies and feels like she is black. This could be a genetic memory carried down from an ancestor, or it could be a past life that she’s remembering, or some other reason that we know nothing about, Why did she start working for the NAACP in the first place? What drew her to fight for the rights of black people? It’s not like she did it for the money – she’s not getting that much. She clearly strongly identifies this way, and I say good for her for standing up and living that way. Most people will condemn and judge her of course, and call her psychotic, but that’s what they called transgender people for many years when they said they felt like a woman in a man’s body. Some people still say that about gay people – which is so sad. It’a about letting people live like they want to live, and if she feels black, then let her be black. If she lied about her parents, then maybe she really doesn’t believe they are her parents. I support her.

    • georgia says:

      How do you feel black?

    • Jayna says:

      She loves to make up huge false stories that put her in the story, not just standing up for the rights of blacks. She wants to be the story, the center of attention, as an oppressed black woman that she didn’t live, like the made-up story, which she admitted to, about being beaten with a baboon whip, used for slaves, by her evil step-father because of her skin color.

      • Angie T says:

        Exactly @Jayna
        She isn’t really interested in standing up for the rights of blacks so much as she wants to be IN the story, the center of attention,

        Wackadoodle

    • Dani2 says:

      What does it mean to “feel black”? I don’t understand what that expression means, is it because she likes looking darker and wearing traditionally black hairstyles? Are you black, just out of curiosity? Because I am and I don’t know what you mean.

    • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

      So her and your idea of the black woman she is is someone who lies, manipulates, and alienates other minority individuals by using her stolen voice and misplaced power to insult and control them?

      Awesome. This is exactly why transracial doesn’t exist. White people have been fighting along with blacks for equality and representation since the beginning. A little initially but more and more gave their assistance so that BLACKS would be given equal platform and the right to respect as a peer. They didn’t slap on a wig and rub dirt on their skin and snatch the mic to talk about their own struggles being black. They didn’t steal their voice and their right to speak about their unique struggles. She doesn’t know a thing about what being black is outside of a few textbook definitions and a ROOTS DVD.

      Luckily she has the support of people like you as she uses people like me for her benefit.

    • LL says:

      But she invented lots of other stories about herself that had nothing to do with race. For example pretending to have cancer. And she did make money and gain respect from her lie of being black. She originally started the deception in order to win a scholarship for AA students.

  36. Cricket says:

    Maybe she and Brian Williams should do a daily show together?

    If she was abused as a child by psycho parents then she has my sympathy for having to endure that pain and suffering but it does not negate the lies and fraud she spews

  37. georgia says:

    Is she trying to get on the maury show with that those white people aren’t my parents bs!?!?

    I’m vegan. I listen to the Beatles and Taylor Swift and rock music. I have white neighbors. I work in film and photography. I were sunblock everyday. I still use a blackberry. Can I identify as white?

  38. J.Mo says:

    I liked the comment of a black man on another site (Huff US); he said she can identify WITH black people but not AS black. I personally don’t think she’s interested in being a black woman, just a high profile black woman of status. She wasn’t content being a minority in her favoured culture because she wanted to be a big fish in a little pond. She wants to be a leader and not an ally to get the attention she craves. I’m a visible minority and often welcome, support and encourage people of any background to work for my community’s causes because they ARE part of the community; I might not be as welcoming if their identity was a pretend one.

  39. Giddy says:

    This woman is a user. When she couldn’t get the attention and accolades as a white woman, she “became” a black woman. But not just any black woman, but one born in a tepee, who had to hunt for food, was beaten with a whip, experienced terrible racism and suffered for her “race”. Time for Rachel to shut up and sit down. She is now unmasked as the life stealing fake that she is. She is quite simply a liar, a user, a narcissist who put on a cloak of blackness for attention. I would pity her if I didn’t dislike her more.

  40. Subconciously says:

    If a woman of colour straightens her hair then that is her own decision.
    If a white woman curls her hair to make it look afrikan then this wrong?
    If a doctor wear the clothes to make him look like a doctor then this is expected.
    If a white woman changes her appearance to look like the people she represents then this is wrong?

    I don’t appreciate that she lied but I think one shouldn’t treat her behaviour as if she were a criminal. Somewhere in her family tree there are relatives who are definitely african. And I can say that because we all are from there : theory: the early humans came from africa and then moved to the other continents, (out-of-africa theory). So wtf …

    Last but not least: doesn’t her story indicate that a woman of colour (albeit light-coloured) can make it? Did her adopted siblings of colour make it?

    • Kitten says:

      “If a woman of colour straightens her hair then that is her own decision.
      If a white woman curls her hair to make it look afrikan then this wrong.”

      You do realize that some WoC have naturally-straight hair, right? Also, this woman did FAR more than just perm her hair, I mean, she had locs and box braids at one point. Oh, and don’t forget about the part where she literally CLAIMED TO BE A BLACK WOMAN
      …because that part is important and stuff.

      “If a doctor wear the clothes to make him look like a doctor then this is expected.
      If a white woman changes her appearance to look like the people she represents then this is wrong?”

      I don’t understand why these two scenarios would be compared because there’s no clear parallel there. Doctors of all genders, races, ethnicities are expected to wear uniforms for a variety of reasons, but mainly so that patients, patients’ families, and staff know they’re doctors. Black is not a “uniform”, it’s not something you wear to work and then take off when you come home.

      In a way though, you inadvertently illustrated why Rachel’s actions are so offensive to so many. She was playing dress-up and *trying on black* like it was a doctor’s uniform. Except she wasn’t just playing pretend, she was actually building a life and a career off of being black, something that she is clearly not. She exploited the oppression of black people and co-opted black culture to make a happy and comfortable life for herself, a life in which she was respected and applauded. Can you see why that offends?

      In keeping with your analogy, if someone you loved was hospitalized would you be ok if you found out that the “doctor” who was treating your loved one was actually some rando off the streets? Or would you be pissed that someone fraudulently represented themselves as something they are not?

      EDIT: Grrrr. Said I wouldn’t comment. This is the LAST ONE. This woman sucks and I don’t want to add to clicks that might fuel a reality TV career for her.

    • renee28 says:

      This has to be one of the most ridiculous things I’ve read. Black women straighten their hair for aesthetics. They don’t straighten their hair and then go around claiming they’re white. Doctors wear lab coats because it’s part of their work attire. Ethnicity is not work attire. You don’t have to put on blackface in order to work with black people. And this whole we’re all from Africa, Kumbaya nonsense makes a nice bumper stick but it’s doesn’t reflect the real world.

    • eknasok says:

      Rachel can act as black as she wants to be; I know several women who are married to black men who act blacker than black. It is them and the word is act. Some identify.

      Rachel is a fraud in the Civil Rights Movement and in her field of the academic world where credibility is essential. Very disrespectful and insulting, to say it mildly .

    • Nicole says:

      Nope. A whole bunch of nope to this comment

    • Cran says:

      I identify with being a doctor. I have a white coat, a stethoscope and a thermometer. You can be my patient.

    • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

      LMAO.

      Ya’ll are doing too much to defend this woman. “If a turkey sandwich one day dreams of being a burger can that turkey sandwich’s dreams be deferred?”

      So wait there are no white people with curly hair? I mean I thought I knew some…and I mean now that you mention it a LOT of doctors do wear clothes to make HIM (so no women doctors right?) look like doctors.

      Also we need Rachel, A WHITE WOMAN, to tell us that lighter skin blacks can be successful? …when we’re you born? Was it yesterday?

    • Marianne says:

      Her perming her hair is not the issue. Her tanning isn’t the issue. Its about how she’s lying that she’s black. Taking away scholarships that arent hers. Making up stories etc.

  41. Merritt says:

    Because it is so hard to get a spray tan, wear bronzer, buy wigs, and go to the salon for perms and weave. This woman annoys the hell out of me.

    She created everything that has happened. She has lied about hate crimes and everything else. She had the nerve to tell someone they were not Hispanic enough. Before she started pretending to be black she sued Howard for reverse discrimination and the lawsuit was dismissed. She has a victim complex.

  42. dippit says:

    “Going from being celebrated as a black woman and loving how that feels by all the students that I mentor… ” in amongst all that incomprehensible babble THAT’s the telling grain to understanding her years of calculated deceit and exploitation.

    I reckon there will be a lot more to come by way of lies and instances of her conning people… this web has not been fully unspun yet.

    BUT that quote, and in context of the Howard lawsuit, she has a pathological need to be celebrated and looked up to but (see Howard), as an individual, lacked the talent to cut it and earn acclaim. And she zoned in on her race having, to her mind, thwarted ‘proper’ recognition of her abilities.

    It makes me furious to think some of her thought process beyond her *perceived* slight at Howard was bound up in “my gifted white skills will have less/poorer competition against my star rising within a black woman arena” style but I fear it may have been. She seems so self involved I can easily reckon the only black woman she rates is the white black woman in her twisted mental mirror.

    Also I do wonder if some aspect of her parents choosing to adopt black sibs for her became a source of resentment and some sense of parental rejection, in spite of her protestations of her self-identifying as black organically/naturally. She, whatever the breakdown of the family relationships, would then have to be the most celebrated and successful black child of her family?

    Whatever, I’m struggling with apologists on this. To maintain the con takes so much arrogance, calculation, and dishonesty. To lay claim to experience (appropriated), then share this to young people (fraudulently) from the position of mentor, teacher, and “celebrated” role model… well that takes having complete disrespect for those whose truth experience you’ve stolen as your own AND complete disregard for the young people to whom you are selling counterfeit guidance and ‘understanding’ from ‘knowing’.

    No excuses.

    • Mixtape says:

      You nailed it, dippit. Thirsty celebs take a beating on this site, but this woman’s thirst for a specific type of attention/admiration has driven her every absurd action. Any “good” she may have done in the process was only a byproduct of this quest for attention and should not be celebrated or used to justify the means. I can’t even contemplate the long-term negative effects her charade and the resulting circus will have on mixed-race persons in the future, who may be doubted, discredited, asked to prove up ethnicity, or otherwise suspected of similar deceit. I hope (but doubt) she realizes she has single-handedly ushered in a new era of racism.

    • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

      Tbh I think you’re really close, it was also in something she said along the lines of “Well I adopted my younger brother and since he was black, I knew I had to be black.” as if there’d been something wrong with adopting a black boy and maintaining her identity as a white woman.

      There’s this weird element where you feel like black people should be with black people and in order to interact she had to be a black person. Like someone up top said when she didn’t get recognition for being a white student at Howard suddenly the problem was her whiteness blinding others to her success.

    • Melanine says:

      “It makes me furious to think some of her thought process beyond her *perceived* slight at Howard was bound up in “my gifted white skills will have less/poorer competition against my star rising within a black woman arena” style but I fear it may have been.”

      This is what I thought as soon as I heard about her suing Howard for being white. She wanted to be celebrated, to be “special”, but her experience at Howard revealed the lie white women are fed from birth: that they are inherently special or better somehow because they are white, and especially true when they are blond. Instead, she learned at Howard that she will only ever be a basic white chick, that as a white woman she will be seen as only mediocre and not special in the way that she wanted, blue-eyed and blond though she may have been. But as a light-skinned, blue-eyed black woman? Why, then she’d really stand out, she’d be unique and celebrated – and yes, then her “‘gifted white skills’ would have less/poorer competition against her star rising within such a black woman arena.”

      People keep talking about her need to be a victim, which seems true, or her maybe messed up family, which IDGAF about because real black women also had messed up families and childhoods and had to deal with it as black girls as opposed to as a blond white girl, which really is a huge difference, and they don’t get half as many passes if they come out as cray as this chick. And while these things certainly may have played a part, you can’t tell me there wasn’t some unexamined white supremacy coming from this Dolezal woman, which makes it so much worse, especially because I haven’t really heard anyone mention it. People dance around it, or ignore it altogether, but I’m sure it played a huge role. This article explains how deeply entrenched the idea of white supremacy is in our society (even among well-meaning white progressives) far better than me:
      http://www.yesmagazine.org/issues/america-the-remix/what-white-people-fear

      I mean, the sheer audacity to think that she will just tan and perm, make some shit up about racial hardships, and voila, she is now “black” because that’s how she feels. I’m sorry, but if she really, truly, deeply empathized that much with “being black” – being a black woman in particular – she as a white woman would never have lied and pretended to actually be a black woman because she would’ve understood exactly what that meant.

  43. EN says:

    Whether she is right or wrong, the witch-hunt of this woman needs to stop. There is only so much human psyche can take. It reminds me of Monica Levinsky case.

    • Colette says:

      This story would have slowly gone away if she hadn’t done five interviews yesterday including letting her 13 year old son talk to NBC Nightly News.Now there is buzz about book deals,reality show,speaking engagements,etc.

    • SnarkGirl says:

      She brought it on herself, and continues to do so. I think she relishes every moment of it, and she constantly spins everything to continue her “poor me” victim role.

      This woman has lied, faked racial threats, sued an employer for racism under the guise of being a black woman, and plagerized art (passing off a virtually identical copy of a Turner painting as her own work). Now that she’s been outed, rather than apologize & try to make amends, she simply lies more (her parents aren’t her parents because no DNA test has been done), and continues her little game of victim to be pitied.

      All she has to do is admit she lied, and stay out of the public eye – no more interviews, no more storytelling, and in a few weeks she’d be all but forgotten. I guarantee that won’t happen. I’d put money on the fact that she’s going continue to go for every bit of attention she can, all the while crying how abused she is.

      • EN says:

        She clearly has issues and built alternative reality for herself. It is a known phenomenon that people can repeat a lie to themselves so many times they start believing it.
        She needs help not ostracism. What is happening now is only making her condition worse.

      • The Original G says:

        Witch Hunt? This woman has been coddled by the media. She’s found herself a spot falling between the crack of tense race relations and other’s sincere interest in being PC.

        She just got another platform with this interview to put on some professiorial airs about black culture and public accountability all the while leaving a trail of slimy lies like a slug. She’s fraud through and through and she knows it people. Let’s move on.

      • nan says:

        She wanted a pass from the Black community! She didn’t want to be “the white person in the room”. It is soooo hard being white, y’all!
        She performed the ultimate act of racism, really, by going to these deceptive lengths, as if nobody in the Black community would ever like/accept her because of her (real) skin color. Wow. She thinks highly of the Black community.

    • The Original G says:

      She needs help? Let ME help. She need to admit that she’s a liar. No more condition. She needs to accountable the same way calls for others to be.

      • EN says:

        If she admits being a liar it will make you feel vindicated somehow? If she commits suicide will you feel better?

        The thing is , people attacking her don’t really care about her or what happens to her , they have an axe to grind. And if a live human being gets destroyed in the process, so be it. I can’t understand this kind of thinking.

        And since they don’t care, why don’t they discuss the real issue, which is race politics and leave her alone .

      • The Original G says:

        I do think she should get help: from a therapist in private. Not, from anonymous social media mavens who want to absolve her of common adult accountability.

        And we agree. It’s real race politics that need to be discussed not this sideshow.

      • SnarkGirl says:

        If she needs help for psychological issues, then I support her getting it. What I can’t support is her ongoing cries of “victim” and her relentless chasing of publicity to try and gain sympathy. She lied, made false accusations, and plagerized and she needs to own up to that. It has nothing to do with vindication, it has to do with a deceitful person doing the respectful, honest thing at last.

  44. Sammi says:

    Textbook psychopath. Such people are highly skilled at creating and projecting various personae. They are devoid of a conscience and thus see no reason why their actions are looked at as morally and/or criminally wrong.

  45. Colette says:

    I think some people think Rachel was the only white kid in her family.That’s not true she grew up with a white brother.Her black siblings are much younger than she is.She is almost 38,I believe her oldest black brother is about 23 or 24.Her parents adopted most of the kids in 94 or 95.She wasn’t raised with these kids.She was a teenager,they were toddlers and babies.

  46. Lisa says:

    They need to stop bringing her onto these morning talk shows as if she’s going to give legitimate answers. Cut it out with the lighthearted questions about her hair, too.

  47. Zombie Shortcake says:

    I’m not up to speed on current black and indigenous scholarship, but I am almost certain at some point I read that “making up/telling stories” and “creating alternative narratives” was specifically identified as a type of political activism/catalyst of social change by some authors.

    • belle de jour says:

      I fear you are getting close to an angle – and a larger discussion, in more than one context – not based upon reaction to one unwell woman in particular. That’s no way to shut down or overrule any possible right for people of all backgrounds and beliefs and experiences to debate the issue, Zombie Shortcake.

  48. K says:

    “It’s been hard for me to actually have the courage to be there for myself ”

    The one consistent thread through all this appears to be her excellence at prioritising herself.

    I agree with the poster who had her tagged as a narcissist who finally discovered a means to attract attention, sympathy, and acclaim by claiming she’d achieved all she had in the teeth of horrendous racism and bigotry, and was now dedicating herself to supporting others. She could bask in the admiration of the world she moved in by dint of lying through her teeth about who she was and what she had lived.

    She really reminds me of Heather Mills MacCartney in a lot of ways. Same earnest self-regard, same wide-eyed surprise when finally caught out, and same martyred sorrow when called on her crap. The sole difference is that Mills MacCartney has at least undergone the genuine serious suffering she claims… in one area of her life, anyway.

  49. Larelyn says:

    On a side note, census forms and other applications often ask separately your race and ethnicity – latino vs hispanic. These are the only race/culture option I usually see. Is it plausible that her decent into this web started with an attempt to join black culture but then went too far into racial appropriations? Are there many folks out there where this race/culture disparity exists? Do the powers that be need to add more options to the ethnicity column?

    • LL says:

      There’s a scan of her application for a university … something (scholarship?) floating around online and she ticked the boxes for black, white, and mixed race. It was an application for something that was specifically for black students. So she was very explicitly lying, for profit, from very early on in her new ‘identity.’

      • Colette says:

        Actually that application where she checked Black,White and American Indian was a job application from last year.She was applying to be on the City of Spokane Police Commission.They investigate complaints made by citizens against the police.I am sure they wanted a diverse commission so she checked everything.So she can be multiracial when it suits her.

  50. Holly Hobby says:

    I’ve stopped reading her comments because they don’t make sense. Would apologizing and moving on be too difficult for her? I did see in my paper that she questioned whether her white parents were really biologically her parents. She also said she experimented with blonde and white to explain away her younger pictures. Wow that’s rich and highly delusional. I wish she would go away.

  51. Penelope says:

    Hopefully her 15 minutes are up soon. She’s obnoxious.

  52. Marianne says:

    Im sure it wasn’t as hard as the lives of actual black people.

  53. Anne says:

    My goodness, bless her. I hope she finds her peace.

  54. Vampi says:

    Yep.
    Let’s see how it goes if a black woman presents herself as white.
    What? You mean she can’t because she doesn’t have the PRIVILEGE of lightening and darkening her skin a will?
    So? So….yeah…this woman is the VERY DEFINITION of white privilege!
    Shoot.. I know that and I’m white. Smh.
    Not to mention all her INVENTED back history and claims of (self sent) hate mail, descrimination, hunting for food with a bow and arrow, her “real” black father, and suing Howard U….because she was WHITE and descriminated against! White????
    Girl, what??!!!
    Then copying art, false police reports.
    I cannot believe she is getting a pass by so many. She is a straight up liar and opportunist. Full stop. Smh again.

  55. Yes, she is a con, yes she is mentally ill. Her ramblings are Kanye delusional taken to an extreme–she is a wannnabe who has built a life of lies. She needs to repent, apologize, humble herself! Until she does, don’t sell her any weapons, any chemicals, don’t let her on a plane, don’t let her near any children! I’m outta here, won’t comment on her again. What is the world coming to?

    • anon321 says:

      She’s on the cover of an upcoming issue of People magazine. She is going to milk this for all it’s worth and the media will lap it up.

  56. lucy says:

    Hard to be a pathological liar and weave and walk through a self-created pathological web of lies? yeah, whatever, Tommy Flanagan. Own it and get treatment please.

  57. tabasco says:

    This chick is giving Kanye and Sarah Palin competition in the Word Salad department.

  58. kara says:

    Im with harris perry. Leave her alone..she can be black if she wants!

  59. Kath says:

    This woman strikes me as a massive racist. She wants to appropriate every “victim” category there is: cancer, sexual assault etc. – and it pisses me off no end that she added “black” to this list – not because she ‘identifies with the black experience’, but for her “black woman” is another item she can add to her weird-as-f@ck victimhood tally. So not only is she a professional bullshit artist, but she sees blackness as another card she can add to her collection so that she can whine about “what I’ve walked through” and how hard her sad little life is.

    I doubt there is a single WoC on this planet who thinks like this.

    I find it very telling that she deliberately moved to a part of the US where there are practically NO black people to point out that (a) she looks about as biracial as Woody Harrelson; and (b) she is full of crap.

    Finally, in what universe does a Masters in visual art (from whatever university) equip you to teach Africana studies at university level?? How did this happen? How many PhDs in this actual subject are trying to find positions? Forget the fact that she is a white woman who has never stepped foot in Africa… she lacks even the basic academic qualifications to teach African and African American studies.

    Arrgh! This whole thing annoys the hell out of me. She is a sociopath.

    • K says:

      Thank you. That nails why she is so infuriating.

      And I hope people are digging out her claimed credentials for that role, because I very much suspect they may have been massaged. And by massaged, I mean bullshitted.

  60. Jo 'Mama' Besser says:

    Of course she can do what she wants: she’s white.

  61. daniel says:

    Bottom line: This woman has OBVIOUS mental health issues. I hope she gets the help she needs.

  62. BlackBetty says:

    I thought this was a joke when I heard about. Guessing she doesnt live in a predominately black community? Because then she could be a real victim of angry people. I hope she’s charged