Even People Mag called out Gisele Bundchen on her burqa-clad plastic surgery

Last week, the New York Post broke a wonderfully juicy story about Gisele Bundchen maybe-probably flying to Paris for several days to undergo some plastic surgery procedures. Some commenters have pointed out that the information about the procedures – Gisele allegedly had a boob job and some eye work – likely came from within Gisele’s camp, as in someone on her team has sold her out. The NY Post had the exclusive photos of Gisele (allegedly) arriving at the plastic surgeon’s office wearing a burqa (and sandals) with her similarly-clad sister. Since Gisele hasn’t officially confirmed or denied anything, by Friday, even People Magazine was going with the NY Post’s reporting:

Gisele Bündchen, is that you? The supermodel, 35, was allegedly spotted entering a high-end clinic in Paris earlier this month dressed in a burqa – the concealing garment worn by some Muslim women – during the holy month of Ramadan, the New York Post reports.

While Bündchen and her sister Rafaela were supposedly disguised from head to ankle as they got out of a Mercedes outside the clinic, several details point to Bündchen. PEOPLE has confirmed that the driver of the car (pictured in other photos) is Bündchen’s longtime Paris chauffeur. And in other photos, one of the women is seen carrying a black Calvin Klein backpack, which is identical to the bag Rafaela had a week later when departing Charles de Gaulle airport. Also of note is that several shots show that the women are barefoot – wearing sandals without covering stockings – which contradicts religious rules.

Representatives for Bündchen have not responded to repeated calls for comment.

According to the French magazine CLOSER, the sisters arrived in their concealing gowns at the Clinique International du Parc-Monceau on July 15, stayed overnight and returned to the Hotel Bristol the following day. Before returning to the United States, the sisters reportedly spent several days at the Sources de Caudale, a five-star hotel-spa, near Bordeaux. The sisters were photographed leaving Charles de Gaulle Airport on July 24 with Bündchen wearing dark glasses, taking a flight to Boston.

It’s a bizarre sighting of the world’s highest paid model, who has been outspoken about the hard work she puts in to maintaining her famous physique.

“Like I tell my five sisters, who don’t work at it very hard at all, whatever you put in, you get out,” Bündchen, who is mom to Benjamin, 5, and Vivian, 2, with husband Tom Brady, 37, told Vogue U.K. in 2011. “I’m not afraid of working hard at anything, whatever it is. I just always want to be the best that I can.”

[From People]

That was pretty bitchy for People Magazine, right? Not only are they saying that their sources confirm that the driver is Gisele’s long-time employee, they then go with a French tabloid’s reporting AND they bring up some of Gisele’s older smug quotes about how she works so hard to stay beautiful. Ouch. I’ll say this about People – calling out Gisele probably doesn’t hurt them at all. Think about the target audience for People. Now think about how most of those women already believe that Gisele is smug as hell.

Gisele has also returned to Instagram after a five-day absence. She IG’d a photo of herself and her bestie doing yoga, which seems like an old photo that she just used to wish her friend a happy birthday. She also wished Giovanni Bianco and Riccard Tisci happy b-days in another IG on Saturday.

wenn21827021

Photos courtesy of WENN, the NY Post.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

103 Responses to “Even People Mag called out Gisele Bundchen on her burqa-clad plastic surgery”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. GoodNamesAllTaken says:

    Wait…did I understand what she meant by that remark about her sisters? Did she really say that? Wow.

    • Snazzy says:

      I know right? What a b**tch

    • springingforward says:

      If you do a google search on Gisele before and after breast implants you can see photos of her rather flat chested. My point is, this isn’t her first trip to the breast fairy. She has had work on her breasts and nose in the past but it was done tastefully and conservatively.

      • kayte says:

        lol “breast fairy”!!!

      • Shambles says:

        The breast fairy?! According to one of the greatest minds of our time, Katy Perry, God is he who hath the power to bestow the bulbous breasts. But I’m liking the idea of the breast fairy.

      • Trashaddict says:

        I want a breast Fairy Godmother! “Oh Breast Fairy Godmother, will you please uplift these sagging t%ts for me? Girl, they are dragging me DOWN!”

    • doofus says:

      yup, basically called them lazy while extolling her own “hard work”.

      and some folks wonder why people think she’s smug.

      • kanyekardashian says:

        All these alleged “supermodels” are (and some of them are hardly worth looking at, including Gisele and John Legend’s wife). How many of them ever come out in support of the average woman? None. Their job is to make the average woman feel like a piece of garbage.

      • Artemis says:

        @kanyekardashian:

        I get what you’re saying but would you believe supermodels if they would come out with their genetically blessed bodies to voice their support for the less genetically blessed? Most don’t know what goes around in the world and aren’t very smart due to busy lifestyle and a lack of schooling. What regular women lack in time and genetics to achieve their body/looks, we make up for it with an education and real relationships. Reality vs. fantasy. They would never understand our reality and I want to believe in the fantasy world they create. Fashion after all is an art form.

        Their job is to sell high fashion clothes and regular women are NOT their target group. That suits me fine. I just want to look at pretty clothes anyway, I don’t need models to sympathize with me.

      • Tracy says:

        Sorry, but Chrissy Tiegen is perfection.

      • Fiona says:

        This is why I don’t like hanging out with women and yes I know how sexist that sounds.. Being a beautiful woman in this world you get a lot of backlash from women.. And apart from my friends I near break out in hives when I meet new women… Some can be very intimidated and that’s just a recipe for disaster. They scrutinize what you say to check for a flaw… Worse if you’re smart and beautiful. Why should she think about the common woman? I got sick and tired last year of having to bring my shine down so I can better work with other women… It didn’t work. So stop asking Giselle to make herself ‘common’ so you can relate to her. If you’re not beautiful it’s not her fault… And her beauty doesn’t make her an outsider who has to be nice to other women so we don’t feel threatened by her.

    • Sarah says:

      It’s not bitchy to quote someone being bitchy. Seriously. People quoted her.

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        No, I was saying she was bitchy to say that in the first place about her sisters. I mean, my sister can get on my last nerve, but I would never say anything mean like that to her. She basically said her sisters weren’t attractive because they didn’t work at it. Right? Or did I misunderstand the quote? I have no problem with people quoting her – that’s her fault for saying it in the first place.

      • CR says:

        What? No, she didn’t say her sister’s aren’t attractive. I think she is right. It makes sense.

    • Lady D says:

      Did she just call her sisters ugly?

    • FLORC says:

      This quote and a few others came out in another story years ago. I mentioned it on another thread, but had no clue where I read it.
      It sums out to Gisele saying you get out what you ut in. She puts in a lot and becomes a supermodel. Her sisters put in very little and… yea. She didn’t call them ugly, but she didn’t call them pretty either. Not sure why’d you say that without pointing that out.

    • LeAnn Stinks says:

      Yes, it seems even the people of Brazil are finally turning on her, too:

      “Gisele a laughingstock in Brazil for trying to hide boob job”: http://nypost.com/2015/08/02/brazilians-mad-at-gisele-for-trying-to-hide-boob-job-its-laughable/?_ga=1.7588914.1886296044.1438619704

      Never liked her, never will. Insufferable, smug, arrogant and overrated usually the first words that come to mind whenever I hear her name mentioned.

      • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

        One more time folks:

        THE COVER-UP IS ALWAYS WORSE THAN THE SCANDAL.

        This woman could have just gone somewhere semi-private and just had people wondering if she looked different once she re-appeared. Now it’s all over the news worldwide and everyone knows.

        Maybe one of her sisters leaked to the paparazzi after too many years of hearing her inane comments.

      • FY says:

        I am Brazilian. She is not laughingstock in Brazil.

  2. Franca says:

    The fact that she wore a burqa is a much bigger issue than the fact that she’s smug about her looks.

    • Detritus says:

      The fact that she wore a burqa, in a country that routinely discriminates against women of color who wear burqas, is the worst part.

      • JaneFR says:

        The country do NOT discriminate against women wearing the burqa, whatever their colour.
        – It is not a “real religious” outfit, it’s not a cultural one (99,99% of french immigrant do not come from countries were that kind of outfit is worn) so no discrimination.
        -It’s not against Muslims since that’s not the burqa itself that is forbidden but any outfit where the face is hidden and the person can’t be identified ( see also, balaclava). So again no discrimination. Just an understandable and reasonable security measure, especially in a country targeted by terrorism.

    • Rachel says:

      That’s what I was thinking.

    • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

      Very true, sadly those two things go hand in hand. She didn’t care or respect a different culture enough to consider not using their robes to cover her plastic surgery boo boos. Now she’s awash in mocking.

      • Fiona says:

        Where do you live… GOD!!!! I wear one when laundry is out and I have Muslim friends I asked before I could wear one and they said it’s not disrespectful, it’s just a garment and she added she tends to wear hers too when she doesn’t want to dress up. I swear the self righteous bulls hit On this site today is incredible. She’s not disrespecting anyone, she’s a model whose still working in a world where women can grow old but not age and trying plastic surgery just gets people going crazy but they still don’t want you to age… Darn I’d have gone in for that eye work in a body bag.. If we all just agreed we rag on beautiful women because they are beautiful we could at least move forward because this comment section, you’d think it was a bill Cosby post.

    • Shannon1972 says:

      Exactly. I thought Muslims thought it offensive to show your feet? Yet they are wearing open sandals – wrong on so many levels.

    • belle de jour says:

      This makes me think we need an official, universal, head-to-toe costume for ducking into a cosmetic surgeon’s office – and that we need a designer walk-off to pick the best one.

  3. Crumpet says:

    I’m pretty sure down dog is a pose to avoid after having eye surgery. Just saying. Not that I would know (oops, I would).

  4. Kdlaf says:

    This goes to show that so much of hollywood is just smoke and mirrors. The majority of hollywood did “work hard” for their looks if working hard means paying a sh!tload of money for the best surgery, fillers, etc money can buy and not going overload with it. The more celebs try to shill this ~natural beauty~ stuff the more I side-eye

    • Palapa says:

      Meh. As much as she is a sanctimonious asshead, we can’t deny that her body is not simply the outcome of plastic surgery. Most of her physique comes from her natural genetics and the very disciplined diet & exercise regime she keeps, which is very hard. If it were a matter of just cheating with surgeries she would not look like that. Case in point: Kim Kardashian…pretends she works out but just gets a bunch of surgeries & looks totally unnatural and soft -bodied.

  5. Talie says:

    I’m more surprised by the eye job — the boobs? She’s been messing with them for years.

    • GreenieWeenie says:

      yeah they were big for a while, then I think she either got smaller ones put in or had the implants taken out altogether. I think she maybe had them taken out because she looked pretty flat in various bikini pics I’ve seen of her.

    • Shannon1972 says:

      Boob jobs need to be redone every ten years. They aren’t permanent, so this could have been routine maintenance, with an eye lift thrown in for fun.

  6. The Eternal Side-Eye says:

    “Whatever you put in, you get out”

    Ugh, hold on Giselle. It’s the early in the morning and it’s tough to drag my drum set out. Hold on – hold on.

    *finishes setting it up 30 minutes later and takes my seat*

    BA-DUM TSSS!

    That quote literally works on such an extra bitchy level, implying Giselle had this scandal COMING. Haha.

  7. Jess says:

    I think the article is hilarious, she deserves to be called out because she’s such a know it all and condescending as*hole. Turns out she needed more than just hard work!

  8. Shelley says:

    Meh…I’m still in awe of her beauty. Even if she gets some work done.
    About the burqa…I find it interesting how a media that usually treats the burqa with suspicion and often disrespect, is suddenly chastising Gisele for wearing one with open shoes. With all the cultural and religious appropriation by the West, I find this isolated case of concern eyeroll-worthy.

    • kanyekardashian says:

      Sorry, but just like Salma Hayek, this woman looks like a dude with a square-ish jawline. So I’m not seeing her beauty.

      • LeAnn Stinks says:

        Here, here. I never saw the beauty, let alone “natural” beauty, either.

      • Crumpet says:

        Gee, you’re so sweet. I have a squarish jawline as well, yet have always been considered a good looking woman.

        It is all about preference. Not all women have to have a perfect oval face to be considered beautiful.

    • Michelle says:

      @Shelley – Many people are against the veil, it is a topic of much controversy and probably always will be. I know an Iranian family that is divided on the issue as half of them are staunchly against it while the other half is completely pro-veil. From a developed world perspective, a lot of people view the veil as oppressive because they believe it goes hand-in-hand with acts like stoning women for adultery, honor killings, and making a woman walk behind her husband. Living in America, I think it’s perfectly understandable why many people here would be against an article of clothing that calls for a woman to cover herself as refers to the showing of her body as “offensive” because it is the antithesis of American views. When a person lives in a country where women have fought and continue to fight for equality, I think it makes perfect sense that the veil would be a subject of controversy. There are those of us who choose to live and let live and refrain from sharing our opinion on the matter, and others who either support or are against it. I don’t think there is anything wrong with the media jumping all over Gisele for this because she misappropriated religious garb to hide plastic surgery. That is offensive behavior whether a person agrees with the burqa or not.

      • Otaku Fairy says:

        “From a developed world perspective, a lot of people view the veil as oppressive because they believe it goes hand-in-hand with acts like stoning women for adultery, honor killings, and making a woman walk behind her husband.”

        I think that’s part of the problem- that a lot of western people can’t separate a woman wearing something like a burka or a hijab, from those abuses and oppressions. It’s like they don’t realize that things like stonings and honor-killings can and do happen without the clothing piece. I feel that it’s not what women wear that is the oppression, but what people’s actions and attitudes are that do the oppressing.

    • Robin says:

      There’s a lot of “cultural and religious appropriation” going the other way, too, a lot moreso at least so far as culture is concerned, in fact. Gisele’s a complete hypocrite if she’s been pontificating about how hard she works to maintain her looks (which aren’t all that great in the first place) while having plastic surgery, apparently several times.

  9. GreenieWeenie says:

    Is she really that unselfaware? I mean, I might IN MY HEAD think, “oh, of course you struggle with your weight because you don’t work hard at keeping fit”….but I would never SAY IT OUT LOUD let alone give a quote to a magazine. Let alone trash your sisters in a magazine. I have a feeling Tom Brady is an emotional child and that’s why they get along so well together.

    • Heather says:

      I think she could have worded it better, but I have read that quote before and I think it makes sense – imagine, you are Gisele’s sister. Everyone likes to say about models, oh it’s genetics. But her sisters look at her and say, hey, we are not rail thin — how is this fair? And Gisele’s response is, I work out 1-2 hours a day, 7 days a week, and I eat basically raw vegetables for most meals. That’s how I do it, it is hard work. I see Gisele’s instagram, and I see her meals. It literally is vegetables. I think, holy sh@t, I would be hungry! I don’t have the willpower! And that is why, I don’t look at her and think, why can’t I look like that – because I know, I don’t eat like that and I don’t work out like that.

      From all accounts, Gisele is extremely close with her family and sisters. She’s Brazilian, and just says what she thinks. It is a different culture than America. I think people just misinterpret a lot of what Gisele says, and it makes is easy to hate on her. I personally love her, love that she loves her family, loves that she loves fitness, nature and positivity.

      • inthekitchen says:

        But not everyone in the same family gets the same combination of how the genes display themselves. That’s why her twin sister looks nothing like her (she does have a twin, right?).

        So I’d imagine that even if both she and her sister/twin worked out the same, they aren’t going to end up with the same body…and the other twin definitely isn’t going to grow another 6″ or whatever. That alone should show Big G that she and her lazy, out of shape sisters (or whatever she is implying about them) are built differently!

        I wish supermodels could admit that – while yes, they may eat a reduced diet and workout a lot more than the average person – their genes (something they had NO control over!) combined in such a way that gave them the looks and body they were born with and it’s different than 99% of other people. It doesn’t make them special or whatever, it just makes their body-type less common.

      • Crumpet says:

        I agree. She is obviously close with her sisters. If they don’t mind her, why should I mind on their behalf?

  10. jinni says:

    People mag is such a punk ass, johnny come lately mag. They are always waiting to post some unfavorable stories about a celeb only after a more bold mag already dropped the tea. Only after they see how the public reacts do they say anything. If they are going to be about that life then be about it. I bet their sources told them about Giselle just like their source knew about the Affleck nanny situation, but only until Page Six (Giselle story) and US Weekly (Nanny story) dropped those stories and People could see that the public was interested and not attacking those publication, only then do they add their day late and a dollar short two cents.

    As for Giselle, anyone that have seen her pictures from when she first hit the fashion scene knows she had work done.

  11. Tiffany says:

    This is the type of stuff that can get you in trouble, press wise. The surgery rumors have been around forever, the smugness in the denial is what is hurting her right now.

    Ah Celebrity, that bubble is bound to burst eventually.

  12. Shannon1972 says:

    She is really insufferable, isn’t she? However, when you have the entire (impossible to please) fashion world worshiping your every move, I guess that would feed any ego. I saw her work the runway in NYC when she first started, and it was the first time I’ve ever seen a model get a standing ovation. She had the jaded masses on their feet. It was something to see…

    That said, it’s kind of fun to see a pin in her inflated ego. 😉

  13. mememe says:

    Damn, let a model get her tits rotated in peace.

    • arabella says:

      LOL! Agree with that, but no need to wear a burqua for the coverup, there’s so much wrong with that. Wear a ski mask 😀

      • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

        Well now I’m just picturing Giselle in a ski-mask on a patient bed while her breasts are literally rotated by a mechanic, LMAO.

    • LeAnn Stinks says:

      That would be okay if she didn’t go around bragging how “natural” she was in the first place and denouncing plastic surgery.

      She’s a phony, arrogant hypocrite. I am so glad she has egg on her face. Oh wait, that’s a burqua. She’s a moron.

  14. Michelle says:

    What a horrible person. I don’t care about her plastic surgery, but that she would go to such great lengths to protect this BS image that she’s perfect shows her to be awful. She would rather misappropriate a burqa than stoop down to the level of normal people. The media in Brazil is having a field day with this. Everyone is bashing her for her stupid comments about how everything has to be natural and how she works oh so hard for her body, etc etc. She gets what she deserves. I hope this means she will never find it necessary to preach her insufferable bullsh*t advice on how to live “naturally” and be perfect like her.

  15. Freddy Spaghetti says:

    You know you messed up when People calls you out!

  16. kri says:

    Tbh, I don’t care that she got PS.They all do it. It’s their bread and butter. Er..their kale and vinegar, I should say. And that’s fine. If I could afford it, I would have a few things hauled up, and a few others slimmed down. I just hate that she was sneaking around in a burqa, like it’s some bad Scooby Doo episode. What’s next G? Big Sasquatch boots? A false mustache? Ridiculous. And how awful to just dismiss her sisters wit that remark. That’s what got me. Nice way to motivate someone.

  17. PHD gossip says:

    It is interesting to speculate who dropped the dime on her secret trip to the plastic surgeon. Of course only her trusted inner circle knew so it is interesting to guess who sold her out. Gossip heaven would be finding out that Ben Affleck’s nanny worked for Gisele and Tom for a few weeks when she was setting up her trip to Paris.

    • Lucky Charm says:

      Maybe it was the sister that was with her, as payback for that awful, snarky comment she made about them, lol!

      • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

        I was just thinking that, lol. Maybe the sister was tired of hearing Giselle’s advice and decided to show the world just what her supermodel sibling is putting into herself.

  18. Esteph says:

    This story probably wouldn’t be as bad, which Kaiser had pointed out before, if Gisele wasn’t so smug or “holier than thou” concerning plastic surgery.

  19. hmph says:

    Her popularity has always mystified me until I had to admit to myself that most women are sheep and not critical thinkers. The gay fashion world loves her – duh! Of course! Because the fashion world is run by gay men and she looks like a man in drag.
    Tall – check
    Skinny – check
    Straight up and down body aka ruler body shape – check
    Masculine face shape/jawline and face in general – check

    All of the above are typical MALE features but women have been brainwashed to think of this as ideal female traits.
    Contouring your lower face in a harsh angle to supposedly create “cheekbones” and in doing so removing all the feminine softness from your face. Hips or “birthing hips” are not in vouge, now it’s pin straight legs with not a hint of fat otherwise you have “thundertighs”.
    Gisele being the highest paid model is crazy if you think about it because she literally looks like a man. And women buy into it and don’t get how easily brainwashed they are.

    • doofus says:

      eh, it’s not so much that she “looks like a man in drag” as much as clothes look GREAT on her (and others with her body type) because there are very few (none) “angles” or curves there.

      the designers want a “moving hangar” on which to showcase their clothes; a tall woman with a straight up and down body works great for that. the clothes “hang” better and a buyer can more easily see the clothes as they’re “supposed” to be.

      • vauvert says:

        But this is why I stopped caring about “high fashion”. If your clothes only look good on genetically rare 6′ tall rail thin flat chested teenagers, why in hell should I give a damn? Show me clothes that look good on a normal woman with boobs and a butt, someone who can afford decent clothing by the time she has built a career and had a couple of kids and is in her forties, and doesn’t care to either starve or go under the knife in a desperate attempt to look unlike herself. That I will cheer for and buy. Which is why I can’t stand idiots like smug G, or the other fried toothpick Goop or a designer like Kunty Karl.

      • LeAnn Stinks says:

        Vauvert, I loved your comment. Very well stated and right on point.

    • Crumpet says:

      Could you BE any more offensive? Women come in all shapes and sizes. The ‘perfect’ female face has always been considered an oval (see Charlize Theron) not a square. But most of the world has moved past that and embraces faces of all shapes.

    • Mintessence (the original Minty) says:

      I agree, hmph. She was never the great beauty the fashion world kept saying ad nauseam. Then again, the fashion industry is an oligarchy. The few who control it can declare any average or awkward looking model is a hot goddess and the rest of the fashion sheeple fall in line to agree. I remember one “renegade” designer (forgot her name) who said on camera that she was unimpressed with Gisele when she was getting noticed. She then shrugged after she said this, I suppose to indicate “what can you do?” as she was the lone dissenter.

      Not long after Gisele got her breast implants, Vogue (I think) stated that curves and breasts are back! – as exemplified by Gisele. I couldn’t roll my eyes hard enough.

      I think there’s truth about the reason Gisele was initially chosen. She has a lot of androgynous features that gay fashion designers love: big square jaw, chiselled cheekbones, lanky body with no hips…which are the same features found on male fashion models. In fact, many designers now don’t like male models with muscles. They like androgyny in both sexes.

      To carry it further, there’s Andrej Pejić, a feminine male model who was often used for women’s runway shows and women’s lingerie ads, ffs! That’s quite a mindf–k, suggesting to impressionable young women that you’re not good enough to wear the clothes because you don’t have the body of a skinny adolescent male. Andrej is now Andreja – a transgendered woman.

      Androgyny can be attractive and interesting as a look, but it doesn’t always work. Designers dismiss classically beautiful female faces as boring. Tyra Banks repeated this mantra on Top Model. The industry thinks curvy, feminine bodies are vulgar (the overrated Kate Upton with her huge bust is the rare exception). Designers do like to pile so much fabric frou frou on their clothes, which only a very skinny person could wear.

      doofus: the clothes hanger excuse is a myth. There were models in the past (Cindy Crawford, Tyra, even Claudia Schiffer) who had curves and looked great in the clothes. 1950s screen sirens with their shapely figures wore designer clothes better than many of the models of that time. I think the real reason is that many of today’s designers aren’t great at designing. They don’t know how to handle a body that’s not straight up and down. I remember episodes of Project Runway where the contestants, talented as they were, complained if they had to design clothes for people who had some curves. They couldn’t deal with it.

      Crumpet: she’s not being offensive. She’s talking honestly about the fashion industry. Most of the world does embrace different faces and shapes. The fashion world does not. They only hire a narrow range. If you examine many of the models today, you’ll see more of them have square jaws, not oval faces. Just as bad, there are only a few “token” models of non-European ethnicity. There were more models of different looks and races in the 90s compared to now. Even Victoria’s Secret is limited – which isn’t about exclusivity like high fashion is – their models are interchangeable.

      I will say this for Gisele: she knows how to walk a runway, how to pose and show her best angles in photos. But her looks aren’t aspirational to me. Her face is meh. Her body is a beanpole, which would be okay, except for the fact that’s the only body type the fashion industry pushes as ideal.

  20. holly hobby says:

    Looks like someone at People do not like her. Hey Gisele, while you’re at it, can you find someone to fix Tommy’s deflated balls too?

  21. Jeanette says:

    I dont see people screaming about Kimberly Stewart posing NAKED in a tribal headdress. Our tribal headdresses are reserved for those who have the RIGHT to wear them, definitely not a prop.

    Giselle was looking for anonymity-and not attempting to be photographed in this garb. Its ironic that she wore a garmet that in a way is body shaming to the wearer, to avoid being body shamed.

    • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

      I didn’t hear of this woman but now I’m interested, you’re right tribal headpieces have been disgustingly used a lot lately for the bored actresses/stars.

      • Jeanette says:

        And not just wearing it for a prop..she was NAKED..My thoughts were.. Get yo skinny YONEGA crusty ass off my ancestors’ symbol!

    • lisa says:

      because i had to google kimberly stewart

      if a tree falls in the woods, is anyone really offended?

  22. Firebomber says:

    I don’t see anything wrong in what she did. Its her business. How many people on here have fake boobs or have had Botox? Or would if they could?

    • holly hobby says:

      What’s wrong with it is she is claiming she is au natural and judging others on their appearance. Basically she said she took care of herself with diet and exercise and you peasants should too.

      She neglected to mention she got help from doctors.

      • Firebomber says:

        She does take care of herself. That’s why she looks great. So what if she decided to get a little help? She’s never come across as preachy to me and I agree with what she said to her sisters. I don’t see it as bitchy at all. You don’t want a fat ass get off of it and quit eating bad food. Where’s the problem?

      • DTX says:

        She doesn’t bother me a whole lot either. I think that part of the reason that she is dishonest about her beauty is that it may hurt her “brand” if she admitted that she gets stuff tweaked. But overall, even without the boob and/or nose job, the woman is still quite the specimen, I mean she is super tall and thin with great hair, skin tone and carries her pregnancy weight incredibly well. A lot of that is natural and the fact that she actually DOES work really hard to maintain that frame. Regardless of what work she’s had done, she still works out more than most people do and has an incredibly disciplined diet that most of us could not (or would not) adhere to on a long term basis. That is hard work and I will give her that.

        However, she was super bitchy to make that remark about her sisters, none of whom got the same genetic characteristics as she did. They are all significantly shorter than her and are shaped nicely, just not pin thin, tall like her. And they don’t really look like her facially either. Which leads me to believe that one of her sisters might have sold her out to knock her down a few pegs…my money is on the overweight one. However, it still feels wrong to be pointing and laughing at her for something that she is no doubt embarrassed about, so I won’t do it…it’s ugly to me.

      • FY says:

        holly hobby: But she didn’t get help from doctors. She takes care of herself.

        DTX: She wasn’t bitchy. I can’t believe you think one of her sisters would do that. They are friends. That’s why she said that.
        She was super bitchy to make that remark? Look at your comment… “My money is on the overweight one…” You are super bit…

    • Otaku Fairy says:

      I’m sure there are plenty who would consider something like botox, fake boobs, a nose job, or lipo, or getting something lifted, but as others pointed out the problem is her hypocrisy. That, plus people are bothered by the fact that she wore a burka to cover it up. My opinion about her wearing the burka while doing this is mixed because on one hand, it’s not like she was wearing it to make herself look edgy and exotic, to mock a group of people, or for monetary gain, but on the other hand, she did misuse an element of another culture and religion.

  23. Cc says:

    Why would she need plastic surgery O.O

  24. Lilian says:

    She looks older than 35.

  25. JRenee says:

    Her twin is pretty and peyite, just not as tall.

  26. Naddie says:

    When I read all the comments about her “greatness”, I realize how marketing is a powerful weapon.

    • Original T.C. says:

      +1

      From the male designer’s POV, I can understand why THEY find her great. they have to come up with a lot of designs and then get them tailored and ready to be displayed in a given amount of time. It’s much easier to get that done if you have a human manikin with no curves, a long height, no fat and a face that doesn’t steal the show from your clothes. Tall thin, flat chested models are like the ultimate clothes hangers.

      What I don’t get is the mainstream women’s magazines that decided to take the clothes hangers and claim that they are the idea female beauty. LOL. Even the designers didn’t have that in mind just anything that would make their jobs easier. It’s hilarious.

      I have never drank the Kool-Aid about the Giselles and Kate Mosses. I look at their faces and I don’t see beauty. Giselle’s face would be considered very unattractive on the body of the average woman. It’s not harsh looking but photographers are good at getting her to pose at just the right angle that removes the harshness and Photoshop fixes the rest. It’s all smoke and mirrors that is packaged and sold to the masses.

      • Mintessence (the original Minty) says:

        It’s that clothes hanger excuse designers often use. Sorry, it’s not a convincing reason for why they now use curveless models, because during the 1990s, before Kate Moss, they used models with hips (early Cindy Crawford, Christy Turlington) and models with boobs (Tyra Banks, Claudia Schiffer) on the runway. Those 90s models had FACES then, and their beauty, along with the fab faces of Linda, Naomi, Helena, Yasmeen, Karen, etc, weren’t considered distracting on the catwalk. Yes, those ladies were still slim, but they were allowed some curves. And they were women, not 16 year old girls.

      • Original T.C. says:

        @MINTESSENCE your guess is as good as mine. Society in general has moved towards faster, easier, less work maybe the fashion world is reflecting the same. If I were lazy or had more work and less time to do it with higher costs; having a tall, curvless straight up and down pole at size 0 would be a good solution. Or it could be a simple case of changing taste in the design world. They go back and forth when curves are in and when they are out. That’s their world and I don’t care what they choose to do, I do care that mainstream media is trying to force feed us their world.

        In the real world a man with options will chose the pretty heart shaped girl with some curves over a more masculine looking hip less girl with no shape. That’s the real world and most men are short, they get insecure around tall women

  27. Jen says:

    I have never been able to tolerate the woman. I also cant understand why she is called beautiful but maybe that is just me. At least we now know where the air from her husbands balls went……………… up her arse

  28. ellalter says:

    She isn’t doing runway anymore, wonder how big Tom wants them? She is not classically beautiful but she is striking and she is right to maintain that because we all have our gifts and clearly brains (chauffeur, sandals, handbag, ATV, diarrhea mouth) is not one of them. The problem with people like that, famous or not, is they just can’t think outside of the little box of their limited mental capacity, as this whole fiasco clearly demonstrates. So what? She’s rich, stunning, and privileged. I would say she could use some intelligent advisers, but something tells me she wouldn’t listen.

  29. Tiffany says:

    The photos are what people are talking about and not her husband being in Vegas with his friend and his friends mistress.

    Well played Giselle. You know her smug ass is not going to let those cracks show.

    People still remember how her and Brady got together, there was sketchiness abound.

  30. iheartgossip says:

    When the high & mighty fall; it’s always a LONG way down. Enjoy the ride, and your cry baby hubby too.

    • WTF says:

      What are you talking about? She is still the highest paid model in the world. Don’t cry. LOL!

  31. FR says:

    That Instagram photo… I think it’s a recent photo. She was photographed leaving Charles de Gaulle Airport on July 24.

  32. Sara says:

    Wow I didn’t realize her and Tom were my age. So she is probably the closest person to Leo’s age he ever dated. Only 5 years apart! Anyway, all she would have to have done was gain about 20 pounds and she would look amazing!