Ben Affleck’s nanny is trying to build a ‘showbiz career,’ wants a reality show

Christine Ouzounian Heads To A Meeting
This was predictable. After parading around for the paparazzi for days, having the audacity to request a police escort to protect her from the paps that she called, and then posing for even more bikini pics (her third bikini photo op by my count), the ex nanny to Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner’s kids, Christine Ouzounian, is hoping for a reality TV career. This story is in the NY Post, which has run fawning insider type stories from Ouzounian in the past. I’m pretty sure she’s their source. I don’t know whether to respect this woman’s game or find it laughably amateur and by-the-book. She’s achieving her objective somewhat although I doubt she’ll be able to spin this into a reality carer.

Ben Affleck’s limelight-loving nanny Christine Ouzounian is searching for an agent and is hoping for a reality-TV career on shows like “The Bachelorette,” Hollywood sources tell Page Six.

Ouzounian — the alleged home-wrecking child minder who ran around with the “Argo” star behind the back of his wife, Jennifer Garner — has been parading around in full hair and makeup for the paparazzi, cruising around Santa Monica, Calif., in a new, top-down $43,000 luxury Lexus, and sipping wine al fresco with friends where cameras can catch her in her full glory.

A source tells us, “The word in LA is that Christine is looking for an agent and wants a TV deal, on something like ‘The Bachelorette’ or ‘Dancing With the Stars.’ She knows she most likely can’t go back to nannying — who in LA would hire her now to take care of their kids? So she’s going to use the spotlight to build a showbiz career.”

The source added there is a possibility that Ouzounian could try to do a TV or magazine tell-all on Affleck, but she would be prevented from discussing the actor’s private family life because of a nondisclosure agreement she would have signed before starting to care for the A-list couple’s three children, Violet, 9, Seraphina, 6, and Samuel, 3.

[From NY Post]

Although it’s hard to keep up with the exhaustive news on this story, I do think this it the first we’ve heard about a nondisclosure agreement. Maybe we won’t see a tell-all interview, which I’ve been expecting for some time. Kaiser has the theory that Ben has paid Christine off and had her sign a new NDA, similar to Tiger Woods’s payoff to Rachel Uchitel when his scandal broke. She thinks that Christine is prohibited from doing a tell all or continuing to leak stories but that she’s able to still pose for paparazzi. Kaiser’s take makes a lot of sense considering that we’re now hearing about Christine’s next move.

Meanwhile Star Magazine reports in this week’s print edition that Christine was cheating on her fiance, Christoph, a fisherman who lives in the Bahamas, when she hooked up with Ben on the down low while working for his family. This is consistent with US Magazine’s story that Christine told employer Jennifer Garner on June 25th, when Jennifer arrived in the Bahamas (Christine had been alone with Ben for five days at that point), that she had just broken up with her fiance. Star Magazine is vague about the timeline when Christine and her fiance split, but they claim that the fiance dumped Christine. A source says “Christoph finally caught on, and he ended up breaking off their engagement.” Here’s the kicker from Star: “Within days, Ben sent his bodyguard to the Bahamas to collect Christine’s belongings from Cristoph’s apartment.

Christine Ouzounian Heads To A Meeting

Christine Ouzounian Stops To Fill Up Her New Lexus

Christine Ouzounian Heads To A Meeting

Photos are from 8-14 and 8-13-15. Photo credit: FameFlynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

189 Responses to “Ben Affleck’s nanny is trying to build a ‘showbiz career,’ wants a reality show”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. NewWester says:

    ” The Real Nannies of Beverly Hills” I wonder if Andy Cohan has been in contact with Christine?

  2. Katydid20 says:

    Of course she does.

    Will someone please tell me when her 15 minutes are up?

    • BeBeA says:

      I think the count down clock needs to be fixed cause according to my watch her time is way up. I’m so sick of seeing that her denim loving behind walk around with that sh*t eating grin. I wish he would just come clean and go to rehab like a good little rich man, so she can vaporize.

    • Nancy says:

      I’ve been asking that same question about the Kardashians and I don’t think the 15 minute rule applies anymore….sadly.

    • Starrywonder says:

      They are totally about to be up. No new news (like I said last week) and all she’s doing is trying to pimp for a damn job. This is too stupid.

    • Mintessence (the original Minty) says:

      *in Darth Vader voice* The thirst is strong with this one.

      Seriously, has any famewhoring side piece with no discernible talent been able to use her stupid notoriety to build a career in Hollywood?

      In this instance, Kim K doesn’t count, as she wasn’t the mistress of someone very famous. She and Ray J were (are) both bottom of the barrel when she did that sex tape.

      • Starrywonder says:

        Seriously I think that’s what they need to say for now on when any articles come out about this hot mess.

      • bettyrose says:

        How long was she even their nanny? A few minutes with the kids before eyeing the dad?

    • BunnyBabe says:

      Does her hairline annoy anyone else??

      Also, she is missing that spark. Usually I would consider a “career in reality TV” an oxymoron, but technically, it is possible. But she doesn’t have the it factor that I think is necessary to stand out from the masses.

      • Maria A. says:

        You said it!
        There is nothing about her. Nothing remarkable, except for her over-keen ambition. She is average to the point of mediocrity and I don’t think she has a good future ahead of her.

  3. Lilacflowers says:

    Her resemblance to Enza is remarkable.

  4. Snazzy says:

    While I find this whole thing annoying I do admire (begrudgingly) her game, you know? I’m glad she’s not ashamed and forced into years of hiding while he continues to be loved and successful. It takes two to tango, after all…

    • Jayna says:

      Forced into hiding? They fired her and I bet Ben gave her a good severance package, and she got a good reference. And no one knew. She could have gone on with her life. But that’s not what SHE wanted. She wanted to be a fame-ho. So she set up the Ben/Nanny shot at the house, because she was already going to sell her story and needed proof. She’s a little opportunist who outed herself so she could make fame-ho money and had dreams of being a D-lister as the nanny who shagged the movie-star right under the wife’s nose.

      • Sandy says:

        A reference? As if this girl ever thinks she’ll need to be a nanny again!

      • captain says:

        @Jayna Do you think they treated her well, then? They had an affair, she got fired by Jen for it, while still clinging on to her husband. He gives her money and REFERENCE, that should be enough for a second-class human being. That’s how he treats his wife, too? Hey, I slept with Blake, here you go sweetheart, 5K, sorry for the inconvenience caused.
        Jennifer and Ben do have so much money, but it doesn’t give them right to buy people. Christine is exactly on the same level, she is a human being, even if she works as their hired help. All people are equal. Money doesn’t make feelings, ambitions and memories disappear.

      • Artemis says:

        @captain:

        Before Garner knew about the affair, she already sent the nanny home because she was too emotional to be around the kids. Meaning, she didn’t perform her job to the best of her abilities. She got to work with A-listers thanks to her sister’s connection and STILL could not compose herself and just HAD to out her affair with Affleck. She got sacked after displaying dubious behaviour.

        Affleck should not have slept with her but there is no doubt in my mind that this was all planned. She reaped what she sowed. I don’t have sympathy for Ben or her. Nasty people.

      • captain says:

        @Artemis totally agree with you. Both are nasty. My remark comes not so much from sympathy, but rather because of the whole “how dare she, she’s the nanny!” and hello? How dare he? He got caught just as much as Christine, worse – it was his own family and his own children, for her it was a workplace, which is important, but not as sacred. So he walkes around, doing his pap sessions, with kids and dog, partying on his private estate and playing ring games.And how dare Garner? She caught her husband, threw the girl out and proceeds walking around with him, smiling and taking photos. And it is not for her kids, please. Kids don’t care about photos in People. They ALL are shameless. Each tries to play his game. And Chtistine is not worse. She is just like them.

    • Alice says:

      I just don’t see him as being a ‘loved’ star and I think he’s on a downward slide and this mess is just accelerating it. Before long, he’ll be at that “Ben, who?” stage.

      • Tate says:

        His like ability factor has plummeted. Divorces happen but the way this has gone down all I see is a sleazy douchebag. Maybe he always was one but now I know it and I can’t un see it.

      • Wren says:

        Oh he always was one, Tate. That’s what Kevin Smith was talking about in his cryptic little comment. I don’t really see him as “loved” either, but he’s a man so it matters a lot less what people think about him. He’ll likely (sadly) be just fine in the long run, regardless of how sketch he is/looks.

      • Kelly says:

        A lot will depend on how the Superman v Batman falls out.

      • Tammy says:

        Downward slide? Seriously? isn’t he on board to star in the next 3 Batman movies and has two other movies he pushed back for Batman? I doubt he will ever be at the “Ben, who?” stage.

    • Snazzy says:

      I was thinking about the comparisons made with the Monica Lewinsky debacle a few years ago … she is what she is, fine, but Ben’s a moron for falling for her game as well.
      So good for her I say, go get that notoriety if that’s what you want.

      EDIT: And as Emma – the JP lover said below, we are once again blaming a woman for a man’s infidelity.

      • Merritt says:

        Is it really comparable though? Monica didn’t reveal the affair. Her so-called friend Linda Tripp did.

      • minx says:

        I agree, she shouldn’t be blamed for his infidelity. I just find her irritating.

      • doofus says:

        eh, I don’t think anyone is blaming her for Affleck stepping out, just blaming her for the continuing fame-whoring she’s doing.

        he’s not out and about doing interviews claiming his innocence; he’s just trying to keep going after hurting his family so much. he’s certainly a lousy husband, to be sure.

        but SHE is out there, every day, trying to get papped in her “drop top”, keeping the story in the news (yeah, it’d be in the news anyway but she is helping to perpetuate it). there’s no decency there…she’s PROUD of being the nanny that f*cked the daddy under the mommy’s nose while forming a bond with the kiddies.

        they’re BOTH scummy.

      • Wren says:

        Monica was also a lot younger and having an affair with a man with a lot more power and status. It’s not quite apples and oranges but the power balance was skewed incredibly higher and she didn’t reveal it (and subsequently roll about happily in the mess).

        What is very similar is that the nanny will be vilified forever while Ben gets less scorn and the scorn will wear off over time. It’s a kerfluffle now, but in, say, 10 years she’ll still be a hussy while Ben will merely be divorced and nobody will care about what he did anymore. It’s not blaming the woman for the affair, it’s that the “punishment” afterwards is so deeply different. Once Ben’s out of the doghouse he will be forgiven and the transgression mostly forgotten. She will (rightly or wrongly) be branded as a shameless whore for the rest of her life and nothing she can do will change that.

      • stinky says:

        Am i on Mars? When a married f*ck comes onto to you – the answer is supposed to be “No”. This goes for both sexes. End OF. I’m gonna puke if i keep hearing this ‘two-to-tango’ b.s. … … … it gets said every time.

      • bettyrose says:

        Snazzy, I think a lot of us question to what extent there was an affair. We’re blaming her for this fame seeking behavior.

      • Skedaddle says:

        I don’t think it’s comparable. Monica was younger, and he wasn’t just her boss, he was the president! And look at how she’s gotten her life together: getting a masters and becoming a spokeswoman against cyber bullying. I think she was a naive young woman who made a terrible mistake and got in over her head but she seems to have evened out and be genuine. This nanny so far is just hustle. It’d be cool if she matured but with that ambition and this media climate? I doubt it.

    • Lisa says:

      MEH! All his dude bro fans are like shagged the nanny! dude! high five!

    • Huh says:

      I agree completely. Unsurprisingly, the cohort believing she needs public punishment and excoriation is singing out their indignation. Yay!

    • lolab says:

      I don’t admire it exactly, but I do find it hilarious she won’t go away and is this thorn in Ben’s arrogant, sloppy ass. She’s embarrassing to watch, but if I”M embarrassed watching her antics, how mortified is Ben Affleck? In that sense, he deserves all the shamelessness she can muster up.

    • Josephine says:

      I don’t think she needs to hide in shame, but she’s asking to be made famous for sleeping with a married man. It wouldn’t matter to me if he wasn’t married. The fact that she is seeking fame from sleeping with someone makes her a total loser in my mind. I realize that the days of needing actual talent to be on tv are far gone if they ever existed, but surely we can do better than to cast someone whose only claim to fame is sleeping with a douche bag.

  5. MrsBPitt says:

    I will not watch ANY show that hires this person! I hate that people get rewarded for doing the wrong thing…especially, when this person seems so proud of it…

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      I agree. Ben is responsible for his own actions, but this woman disgusts me and I hope she falls flat on her face. What a grifter.

    • Christin says:

      Same here. Part of me thinks there is no way she will appear on anything, but the bar is so low nowadays.

      Ben did something stupid, without doubt. It could be simply going behind Jen’s back to ‘help’ her after the firing.

  6. embertine says:

    Goddamn, this woman’s thirst could drain the seven seas. I wonder if Batfleck will ever admit he got played by a professional money-grubber?

    • beanie says:

      ‘Goddamn, this woman’s thirst could drain the seven seas.’ This made me laugh hard! Thank you for that embertine!

  7. Loopy says:

    And look how we are all helping her achieve her vapid dreams.

  8. Jayna says:

    Women watch the reality shows she wants to be on, and women aren’t going to accept her. She doesn’t get that she’s unlikable because of the way she has been out selling this story and selling photos. If she thought leaking this story and photos she set up and go paid for, ad nauseum bikini shots or other shots out and about with her new hair blow-out and full makeup and bragging about buying a Lexus because of screwing Ben and living it up at the Hotel Bel-Air was going to make her star material that anyone cared about past this story, she’s wrong, wrong, wrong.

    DWTS or the Bachelorette? LOL That’s funny.

    • MonicaQ says:

      I would normally say that but some women watch the Kardashians so I don’t even know and THEY are the most unlikable things in media since Paris Hilton.

    • doofus says:

      yes, this, exactly.

      I’ve been wondering what she thinks she’ll get out of this. reality show? what kind? I don’t think anyone wants to see her “day to day” life…it’s boring. DWTS? she’s not a “star”, of ANY kind. I just don’t see, as you said, any interest in her beyond the details of this story. she’s not a very likable person, period. and there’s not enough there to “hate-watch” anything she does.

      • TrustMOnThis says:

        She can certainly get work in porn… and probably escorting too, if she’s not already doing that. Vivid might even make her a contract girl if she has any aptitude. Then she can tour strip clubs and charge for fans to get polaroids with her.

    • Kitten says:

      Yep this completely.

    • OhDear says:

      I agree, but we’re still the ones making her famous by talking about her, though. She doesn’t care whether she’s disliked (I think she’s aware of that), she only cares that she becomes famous.

      Watch, she’ll probably do a tearful, apologetic interview in which she’ll be sorry for “all the pain that [she] caused, but she was trying to navigate a rocky situation and help Ben* out, but Ben* played her like a fool.”

      * Not saying he’s not to blame for this situation

    • Wren says:

      I don’t think she cares much, she just wants the attention. Any and all attention is good. Whatever it takes, even if people hate her, it doesn’t matter as long as they’re paying attention. Once interest dies down over her pap walks and luxury (?) goods, she’ll pull something else out and wave it around.

      • captain says:

        Absolutely, you’re spot on. And I’m waiting for it, actually. Everyday nanny installment I enjoy, but I’m waiting for the next revelation.

  9. Kath says:

    I’m really sick of a culture that rewards people like this.

    Ditto the Kardashians…

    Ditto Donald Trump…

    What the hell has happened to the world where being a morality-free scheming harlot who betrays her employer and the kids she’s supposed to be looking after is a ticket to easy street?

    Does this horrible woman not have parents or friends? Mine would disown me if I was involved in something so sordid.

    • Beth says:

      My words.

    • frivolity says:

      Unfortunately, If you go back in history, we’ve always lived in a world like this. It does seem to be getting worse and worse, though, which is the usual state in a declining empire …

      Nice to know some people (like those on CB) still have ethics.

      • Liberty says:

        @frivolity, so true.

        I even own a set of Victorian era buttons, from a man’s vest, from an English estate (long story). So what? So each of the buttons features a tiny hand-tinted photo of one of the gentleman’s mistresses. He apparently wore the buttons proudly when gadding about in London at his club etc with the guys, away from wife and kiddies.

      • Sullivan says:

        Oh, I’ve got to see those buttons.

      • CooCooCatchoo says:

        @Liberty, the story behind those buttons… wow! Where in the world did you find them?

      • Isabelle says:

        Not getting worse we just have the technology to view in mass numbers. The human race doesn’t change just the technology, & displaying the “sin” through it.

  10. Emma - the JP Lover says:

    “Ouzounian — the alleged home-wrecking child minder who ran around with the “Argo” star behind the back of his wife, Jennifer Garner — has been parading around in full hair and makeup for the paparazzi, cruising around Santa Monica, Calif.,”

    I lived in Los Angeles for 8 years. 99.9% of the women in L.A. walk–and cruise–around in full makeup, nice clothes, and styled hair even to just go down to the corner store. And Ben Affleck ‘home-wrecked’ his ‘own’ marriage. You can’t Tango without a partner.

    We are once again blaming the woman for a man’s infidelity.

    • maura says:

      I agree, not saying what she did wasn’t wrong, but she seems to be getting so much of the blame in comparison to him. I’m sure she realised her nannying career was over and is now trying to make a new career. I don’t think it’ll work but time will tell.

      • MrsBPitt says:

        I think the reason that she is getting so much blame, is because she seems so proud, and excited about everything! The least she could do, is look a tiny bit ashamed….but this was her endgame! Pictures in the tabs, looking for reality shows…she is being rewarded for her part in an alleged marital infedlity, and loves every minute of it…

      • Liberty says:

        @MrsBPitt — read the little theory piece that a writer named Maureen O’Connor wrote about her pride on The Cut — it’s call A Celebration of Ben Affleick’s Nanny. Basic premise: “She’s the other woman, and she’s not ashamed.”

      • aang says:

        Liberty, the piece was spot on.

    • Jas says:

      She is being blamed for setting him up in front of the paps (which she did), selling her story through ‘friends’ and setting up pap walks. To betray someone like that for fame says everything about her despicable character. That’s on her, not Ben or anyone else. We don’t even know if the affair allegations are true, all we have is the word of a shameless, deceitful, backstabbing woman who will do and say anything for fame. Not credible. It would be equally reprehensible if the genders were reversed and this was a male employee doing this to Jennifer.

    • Snazzy says:

      Agreed

    • MrsBPitt says:

      Ben has totally denied that he cheated with her. There are pics of her delivering him a package. And when she did there was no hug, no kiss. No pics of her actually going into his place (at least, that I saw) She flew on a private jet, to Las Vegas, (on which, other people were aboard, and I thought, I read, that her sister lives in Vegas)….No, I’m not naive, but I am just saying, that at the moment, all we have is the Nanny’s story, and some pics of them talking and smiling…And, at least Ben has worked hard for his career and fame. He didn’t just sleep with (according to the Nanny) someone and tried to become famous for that. If Ben cheated with this woman, then he is a fool for denying it, because if more proof comes out later, then he is a liar and a cheat. If he did sleep with the Nanny, he should have just made a statement that it happened and he is ashamed, sorry for hurting his family, blah, blah, blah, because denying it will make him look worse in the long run. As soon as, he admits the affair, or there is tangible, indisputable proof, then she is the homewreck, telling stories to the media to wreck a couples family. Until, more evidence comes out, I’m not calling Ben a cheater, just because some chick wants her fifteen minutes of fame! Ok, everyone can start yelling at me now….

      • frivolity says:

        Mainly because of the carefully worded statements from Ben’s camp, I think he did sleep with this chick. And as we all know (see PBS show affair), lying to maintain an image is Ben’s M.O.

      • Luca76 says:

        Ugh I’m sorry but that’s silly. You are also skipping over that Goop said point blank that he’s cheated, that he was caught going down on a stripper at his bachelor party, that since he’s been married he’s been rumored to have cheated too many times to count. That Jen Garner’s team has run to People and pretty much confirmed that she caught him red handed. At this point thinking nothing happened this one time is naive, wishful thinking and very silly.

      • maura says:

        If it’s not true why doesn’t Batfleck sue her/all the publications printing these stories? Just playing devils’ advocate here but these rumours are damaging his image and will upset his children in years to come, so if it’s not true, I would shut it down if I were him….

      • FWiW says:

        Jennifer Garner’s camp quoting Jen saying it was the “ultimate betrayal” is an admission he slept with the nanny. Plus when you add other pieces it all adds up to Ben being a cheater and an arrogant liar. Not believing it at this point IS being naive.

      • Tiffany :) says:

        “If it’s not true why doesn’t Batfleck sue her/all the publications printing these stories?”

        In the US, you can’t sue someone simply because they said something about you that wasn’t true. The bar you have to reach is VERY high, it is a waste of money. You have to show that not only was it not true, the person knew it was true and maliciously intended to cause you FINANCIAL harm. Those things are very hard to actually prove.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      I don’t think she deserves to be blamed for the affair. He was the married man who decided to betray his wife. But I think her behavior since has been despicable and thoroughly disgusting, and she deserves to be called out for that. If her actions were only embarrassing Ben, I wouldn’t care. But she is hurting Jen and those innocent children she was supposed to look after.

      • TheBeautifulNorth says:

        I agree with you, GNAT. And if JG:s mom is ill as well…

      • littlestar says:

        100% in agreement with you, Gnat.

      • Pale fire says:

        GNAT you never know. I worked with a younger girl. She was only 18-19, to my 25. Our manager was in his early 30’s and married to the bosses daughter. Only reason he worked there. They flirted mercilessly to the point I got grossed out. I figured he was creepy,and she was naive and young. Until one day she turned to me on the rare occasion his wife came in to visit her father and husband , and she said “I can break that up”. I was pretty shocked and don’t doubt crap eventually happened between them. :-/

    • Luca76 says:

      Preach sister!!this woman is a piece of crap for sure but it’s well known Ben is a dog. He’s been publicly caught cheating before on J-Lo, he’s been attached to many other women during the last 10 years while married. He is responsible for his behavior she didn’t kidnap him.

      • MrsBPitt says:

        Yes, Luca76, there have been many rumors over the years about Ben’s cheating on Jen….where is the proof….the tabs have someone cheating on their spouse every week…UM, wasn’t Angie cheating with one of the actors in Unbreakable, wasn’t Brad cheating with his assistant? Rumors don’t equal proof!

      • Luca76 says:

        This has nothing to with Angie, this isn’t a story in a low level tabloid. The woman has come forward, a separation has been announced, there are incriminating pictures (WTF was he doing with the nanny for 2 hours with no kids around???)
        There are details coming out from many sources and most importantly a detailed story in People. Just because there are no stained sheets or pic or video of the deed that doesn’t mean there is no proof.

      • Kitten says:

        When has anybody around here ever needed proof? 😉

    • Starrywonder says:

      Yeah I give Ben shade too if anyone can prove anything happened. All we keep hearing is from sources (which I imagine are her). Until someone shows me some actual cheating happened with her I am going to side eye her forever for keeping this mess up. She’s getting internet famous for proudly sleeping with a married man. She gets a big old nope.

    • Wren says:

      You can’t wreck a home that doesn’t want to be wrecked. I don’t blame her for the affair, that’s all on Ben. No, she shouldn’t have participated and should have stuck to her job, but it was Ben who ignored the well being of his family.

      Now, her proud flaunting of anything and everything about herself and the affair, that’s allllll her and it’s gross. No, there’s no “proof”, and perhaps (as others pointed out before), the relationship was mostly in her head and she’s got some mental issues, but if it truly was nothing I’d expect Ben to shut her crap down hardcore.

    • annaloo. says:

      No, i think we don’t like her gloating and immodesty about it. She is absolutely shameless about this. Affelck is definitely to blame, but htat this ho relishes and basks in the attention is just …ugh. no words.

    • Kelly says:

      If I were a blatant fame whore, I think I would dress a little better.

    • OhDear says:

      It’s not as if she’s struggling to live her life while being hounded by paps because of this affair. She’s calling the paps herself and trying to profit off (fame, showbiz career) of it. There’s a difference.

      No one, or at least very few people, are absolving Affleck of any responsibility for (allegedly) cheating on his wife. She’s trying to make herself the center of attention in all of this, so she’s going to get negative comments about doing so.

    • Tammy says:

      She’s getting the blame because she leaked the story.

  11. ldub says:

    Girl! Just, STAHP!

  12. cindyp says:

    I don’t get it; she’s average looking at best, even with the make-up & blow out.

    • Mispronounced Name Dropper says:

      Apparently there’s no such thing as average looking because beauty is subjective. Apparently most people in be real world don’t rate others or themselves on a scale of 1-10 to gauge looks and compatability. Apparently no one is out of anyone’s league because said leagues don’t exist.

      • captain says:

        You are wonderful, thank you. If you could just put it on repeat and make it automatically appear everytime someone’s nose, fingers and left toe are getting dissected to show their inadequacy, that would be great.

    • INeedANap says:

      I’m short and compact like her. I always thought that meant ugly. Maybe I should walk around with some confidence, because apparently women like me can convince A-list stars to fly me to Vegas!

    • Kitten says:

      She has extensions. 100% sure of it.

      I know she’s not from Boston, but she looks like a basic Boston chick. I bet she wears a black North Face fleece and chestnut-colored Uggs in the winter.
      Typically pretty by Boston standards, but very average for LA standards.

      • littlestar says:

        She also looks like a basic Regina chick (where I am from). The poorly fitting jeans, the dated looking hair – ugh. This chick just has no style whatsoever.

    • Isabelle says:

      She’s isn’t hot, short, not much shape…but this isn’t why men cheat. women are mistake if they believe men only cheat based on looks. they cheat based on availability & opportunity. Also, she has to be willing.

  13. Kiddo says:

    Needs more butt implants, facial and breast plastic surgery along with a sex tape and a momager. Decency, you guys!

    Sidenote: her legs are on point.

    • Mispronounced Name Dropper says:

      Like hell they are.

      • Kiddo says:

        In her shorts, they look pretty solid and strong, but def not skinny. Still, looks like she works ’em.

      • Kitten says:

        Yeah I’m not seeing it.

        On a purely superficial note, I’m kind of excited to say that I look better in a bikini at almost-37 than she does at 28. Ha!

        Yes I know I know, very vainglorious but just let me have this moment, please.
        If for no other reason than 40 seems so close….

        🙁

      • Jegede says:

        @Kitten – LOL.

    • MrsBPitt says:

      I’m sure the appointments for all those surgical procedure have already been made!!!! After all, in her mind, she is an important celebrity, who needs protection from the paps. She must look her best!

  14. Nancy says:

    This whole story repulses me. Anything that seems too good to be true, i.e. Ben & Jen usually is. He is disgusting for being so blatant and obvious about the choice of a paramour….but Jennifer, really? With the history of actors leaving their wives for nannies, why on earth hire an attractive young woman to take care of your kids. The whole hand that rocks the cradle syndrome.

  15. Know-it-all says:

    If Ben can do it so can she you go girl I will watch the show.

    • MrsBPitt says:

      I don’t understand what you are saying? If Ben can do what? Ben has had a career in Hollywood for over twenty years…an acting career, a writing career and a directing career! UM, why exactly should this woman have a career in show biz??? Please explain your crazy theory, that the Nanny deserves a chance in Hollywood for all her had work on her back????

      • Nancy says:

        The nanny deserves nothing but disdain. How could a woman who chose a profession to care for children be so heartless. Does she not know how her actions can affect those kids who probably idolized their dad who treated their mother with no respect or honor. I can’t remember any other of the women in his life other than Jennifer Lopez and he broke her heart as well. They said you lose a man how you got him and in the nanny’s case that is infidelity. Kind of reminds me of Miranda Lambert, she was very much aware Blake was married but that didn’t stop her. Your cheating heart will tell on you.

      • Alice says:

        Know-It-All is a JG hater, so anything nanny does is a-ok.

    • Jets says:

      Know-it-all – Your English/grammar is really bad…. I have a hard time interpreting what you’re trying to say when you post, sorry

    • Josephine says:

      Why would you watch a young woman just because she slept with someone? Seems kinda sick, actually. If she wants Ben’s career, she can start by writing an award-winning screenplay and learning to act and direct.

  16. Jas says:

    Who does she think wants to watch her? She’s a fashion blind, pathetic, tedious, non achieving, desperate famewhore who sets up and sells out people who trusted her (and probably exaggerated if not outright lied) for media attention. She has nothing of herself to offer. She’s deluded to think anything is going to come of this.

    Her life is over now, she chose to throw it away, not by having an affair (allegedly) but by trying to viciously exploit a family (possibly with lies) who welcomed her into their home and trusted her with their children. Vile creature. Who would want this snake in their life?

  17. Alice says:

    Don’t most gas stations pist signs saying don’t use a cell phone while pumping gas? Silly girl, all your dreams could go up in flames.

    • Mispronounced Name Dropper says:

      That’s a myth exposed by Myth Busters to be false. The real danger is walking from the pump to pay the attendant and being distracted by your phone while cars are moving around you.

  18. Kylie says:

    Wanting is not getting. If she wanted reality fame she should have gone after Rob Kardashian or Scott Disick.

  19. Talie says:

    She can’t be the Bachelorette, but she would be hired to be one of the girls on the Bachelor. Dancing with the Stars…no way. Not famous enough.

    • Josephine says:

      I’ve never watched those shows, but don’t those women have actual careers and interesting things to talk about? Or am I fooling myself?

  20. Dash says:

    Maybe like Celebrity Rehab or Intervention or something…. No ones giving her a solo show.

    • MrsBPitt says:

      Yeah, maybe Dr. Drew or Dr. Phil….I think that is about it for her….

      • Jayna says:

        She can go on Dr. Drew, like Rachel Uchital did. She said her addiction was love.

        Bawahahhahahahahahaah. Love. That’s a good one.

  21. PHD Gossip says:

    If she signed a new NDA we won’t have that Gloria Allred press conference. Sigh!

    • Kylie says:

      That was never going to happen anyway. She has no case against Jen, since her employment was likely at will or had a termination clause at the discretion of the employer. It is also questionable what she could sue Ben for.

      • The Original G says:

        And yet Ben hasn’t even threatened to sue any tabloids?

      • Merritt says:

        @ The Original G

        If Ben has decent attorneys, he won’t bother with that threat. It would be an impossible case. And tabloids are vicious, they would just go after him harder and perhaps dig up more women who are unknown at present.

      • Starrywonder says:

        There’s no point in suing the tabloids (US based ones anyway).

  22. smcollins says:

    Shocking…says no one

  23. Izzy says:

    Oh honey, just pose for Playboy already, and then get lost.

    • EXACTLY. I have no respect for her game, because you can practically YELL OUT the plot points that she is going to hit along the way. The “walking to my car with iPhone in hand” pose, the “yoga mat” pose, the aviator classes, the “bronde” hair. Her approach is just so….ham fisted. If you’re going to do the notoriety pap walk of fame, at least be original. This spray-tanned, leggings and a shirt, aviator glasses bit has been done, and done, and done. Open your pap walk encyclopedia to Amal Clooney, Venice edition.

  24. Mia4S says:

    Another reason to hate reality TV.

    Show business? Look if you are in a fictional TV show that 3 people watch on Syfy, or every movie you were in bombs; congratulations, you are in show business and made it further than 99% of the world. Reality TV is a haven for famewhores and freaks, nothing more.

  25. The Original G says:

    Yes of course, NO one working in films or TV in Hollywood is an adulterer or got their jobs using their social or sexual connections.

    • No, many are, but in order to get and keep these jobs, you also have to be able to work in harmony with other human beings. Piss off the wrong people, and that’s you finished before you started. She will never get off the ground. She’s just not that interesting.

  26. OrigialTessa says:

    I’m having this fear that Ben is going to try to get Jen back to rehab his image, not because he really loves her. He’ll call it a mid-life crisis and go to rehab and there’ll be pap pics of them huddled crying in a corner… I can see it all, and Jen needs to get the heck out of that marriage and never look back. Run, Jennifer, run!

  27. dippit says:

    For the love of any value to entertain and interest the public Hollywood (in its widest, now much bastardised sense) still has MAKE THIS STOP!

    The fact nobody, apart from HER ‘sources’ FRIENDS, even remember HER NAME (unless “Nanny to the Afflecks” is legit inked on her birth certificate) should be hint enough for any likely agents/RTV producer types that THIS woman has no potential to have media legs; despite the pap strolling shorts.

    Put 100 basics in a line-up and I’d still identify as “umm maybe” on 99 and only rule out the other 1 for badness sake. And that’s from me as a media watcher self-selecting to still skim ALL the articles. I’m as close to ‘invested audience’ as it can get – and my only engagement is wanting her Gone Girl back to obscurity!

    If it’s time for a Red Line, and It Is, on stopping talentless, fameho wannabes making out on MAYBE having made out with a Name… it’s NOW!

    Old Nanny to the Afflecks, do one – exit thisa way —-> 🚪. 15 mins = ⌛🔚

  28. Merritt says:

    I doubt she will get a reality show. She is not marketable towards the core demographic. Most reality shows are geared towards women. Which is rather depressing considering how offensive towards women they are.

  29. ladyg says:

    Gambler’s Prediction: We’re hearing about the “fisherman boyfriend who lives in the Bahamas” now because she’s pregnant. This way, when she starts showing, they can say, “Fiance’s baby! We told you she had a fiance!”

    Odds?

    • burnsie says:

      As if this whole timeline wasn’t confusing enough, now she was engaged to a guy living in the Bahamas while she was living and working in LA?

      • Christin says:

        Supposedly so. And the big break-up supposedly led to her being so emotional that Jen told her to go home (from the Bahamas).

        This story has more holes than Swiss cheese.

      • paranormalgirl says:

        I wish they would leave my beloved Bahamas out of this. The Bahamas is innocent.

  30. Geekychick says:

    This whole story and lots of comments could be used in some kind of study at how far in delusion we’re ready to go to protect image that we love. Ben’s cheating ways brought at least two of his past relationships to end(J. Lo, Goop), and TBH it seems everyone is forgetting the rumors about Blake and many, many others. Fact is, do you all really think his team would be so mild in it’s handling the nanny-issue if he didn’t hook up/cheat with her? She’d be destroyed, just like that. I honestly can not believe some of the comments:degrading everything about her-her legs, her body, her face(btw, I find Affleck sleazy and ugly with that moobs and roid arms, so she’s a catch for him, looks-wise), making presumptions about he whole lofe and person based on all these stories and photos, yet still leaving doubt for Affleck without “definitive proof”. Was she the married one? Aren’t those children who are so hurt and betrayed his? Why aren’t we discussing how repulsive, gross and just incredibly arrogant he is?

    • Kitten says:

      How is bagging on him for his looks any better than people bagging on the nanny for her looks?

      I find it odd how all the women who rush to the nanny’s defense conveniently ignore the fact that SHE cheated on her fiancée. Yes, Ben betrayed Jen but Christine betrayed her fiancée AND Jen. Don’t forget that she had an existing relationship with Jen—Jen trusted her to live in her house and take care of her children and she exploited that trust in the worst way.

      Just think about what Christine’s ex-fiancée must be feeling right now. Not only did she cheat on him with her employer who happens to be a high-profile celebrity, but now she’s parading around her affair with such hubris and ZERO respect towards his feelings. So effin’ gross.
      Yes Ben is awful but she is a disgusting person who should not be held up as some sort of innocent that needs to be protected of defended. Infidelity is not something to be proud of, it is not something to be rewarded.

      The idea being pedaled by some commenters here seems to be that when women cheat it’s fine, but when men cheat it’s not. The woman is perpetually the victim regardless of who she betrays, and the man is the perpetually the villain.

      Really f*cked up when you think about it.

    • Josephine says:

      I just assumed people aren’t talking about him because it’s all been said. But for a person or two, no one is defending him and everyone has insulted him for many years.

      Folks are talking about her because she’s the one courting pap attention right now, and courting it hard. She wants to be known, and she’s getting her wish. We all know what comes with throwing yourself out there like that. Not sure why we’re boo-hooing for someone who has chosen to play the game.

      • captain says:

        He is courting pap attention like crazy. That puppy thingy was worse than Sears shopping with police escort. Jen is courting pap attention so much, she had to tag along with him on his birthday outing with kids for no other reason, but PR. This is how these people operate, and they do not hesitate to drag their kids into their PR tactics. This woman is no different.

  31. Andrea S. says:

    Well, all I gotta say is this oversized denim shirt of hers is really ageing. She looks like an ad for Coldwater Creek or Land’s End dressed like that after what we’ve seen her in…and, I’ll say it: it makes her look bottom-heavy(i.e. fat!)

  32. tracking says:

    And the next Bachelorette is… a morally bankrupt young woman, ever on the make, with no regard for children she is hired to care for. Srsly? No one would root for her, which is what the show depends on, right? Even with DWTS, unless there is a love-to-hate persona featured on that show. Ugh, I can’t believe she thinks she can parlay a bad personal choice into fame and fortune.

  33. lizzie says:

    this girl is mentally ill right?

  34. Dari says:

    She makes Kartrashians look like Saints. I wish in 2016 that all media stops following this type of woman. One type all the time but the stupid award goes to Jennifer for hiring her. Yuck. Oh the good ole days of the Bloomingdales when Mistresses went away.

  35. littlestar says:

    I wonder if this girl (I find it hard calling her a woman based on her immature actions) realizes she’s completely f’ked her future up? Who would want to hire her? Those looking for an employee whose infamy will bring them publicity? I doubt their are many reputable employers out there who are looking for that. If she was given a payout by Affleck, she sure isn’t spending it wisely. Give it a few months, she will be OLD news, she won’t be able to make money selling her bikini strolls, and she’ll have blown what she did have on hotels and cars. She really screwed herself over.

    • renee says:

      I agree with you, littlestar.

      does this woman have any parents? anyone who can tell her just how tacky her pride and vanity and self-involvement looks?

      she has trashed her own name, shamed her family name.
      she wants to celebrate how she is behaving and run with it?

      could she be taking some kind of drugs to be thinking it’s ok to be hired to care for a family’s kids and then make a play for the husband?

      i don’t get it.

    • holly hobby says:

      Monica Lewinsky admitted that she was basically unemployable after Interngate. So the Nanny can probably marry some rich old geezer and inherits his dough because she’s now unemployable.

    • lolab says:

      she’s old enough to know the consequences I think. Fame is such a destination in our culture though, some folks will take it any way they get it and try to give it a good run in the process.

  36. Bea says:

    LOL at her budget yoga mat. That’s all the snark I have.

  37. Jayna says:

    I feel so sorry for Jen. It’s bad enough to have your husband cheating, even if the marriage is ending. But to do it with the nanny, which is such a betrayal in your own home, someone you interact with, and now to have that nanny be a reality fame-ho wannabe, selling stories, doing pap walks, grinning like the cat who ate the canary, posting things like, ” A girl on fire,” and now putting out there how she’s looking for an agent and wants to be on The Bachelorette and Dancing with the Stars. How does she think they will announce her on DWTS? And now we have dancing with Val Chmerkovskiy, Christine O………., the ex-nanny who fvcked Benn Affleck. Give her a big round of applause. They will be dancing to Backstabbers.

  38. Sparkly says:

    I knew she was pushing to be The Bachelorette or some stupid thing like it. I’m already so over this chick. I hope she gets less famous, not more.

  39. holly hobby says:

    Is Fox going to resurrect Paradise Hotel? Maybe she can also be in The Help who Sleeps with their Bosses.

    Her clothing is atrocious by the way.

  40. lolab says:

    The funniest thing about Christine is that she’s really old to act the way she does. I’d get it more if she was 20 and smiling like an idiot at the paps with that same puppy dog eagerness. But she’s pushing 30, and that cracks me up.

  41. Jenn says:

    There is seriously something wrong with this chick. Shes a total pysco!!

  42. sx55 says:

    Doesn’t deserve Affleck. He is waaaaay too good for this trash.

    Bye b1tch.

  43. liz_bee says:

    This bitch is BASIC AF.

    • Alice says:

      Lordy, jayna! Is that what 5′ looks like? I’m 5′ and I think of myself in very Xena-esque terms, not like a Munchkin.

      • Jayna says:

        LOL Well, she is standing next to a man who is 6’4″. Anyone short in flats is going to feel miniscule next to him. I think she’s lost weight since then, also.

        Honestly, I think she might be four eleven, because she appears very short. But It’s all in how you are built and your body frame anyway. I used to work with a girl who was either five one or five foot tall, and she was perfection. She was petite, very small-boned, and had the perfect figure. Everybody felt like a moose next to her. She is built like Kylie Minogue, who is also five foot tall.

        Lady Gaga is just five foot one, and when she’s at her most fit, even barefoot on stage she looks so much taller because of her body frame and she’s very proportionate bodywise. Her legs look long and shapely, midsection the same, long arms, etc. Even when she gains weight she looks a little taller than she is without heels. Of course, she’s mostly in heels, so looks taller anyway.

  44. Jets says:

    Her makeover is a result of her PR crisis management team advising her on how she needs to turn this scandal around and get the “upper hand” not be the “victim”. Because let’s not pretend that Ben was an unwilling participant in the affair, if you read the USWeekly article that busted their relationship, you’ll learn that Ben pursued her, via text, email, phone calls, he was courting her, that’s why she thought that she would be the next Mrs. Affleck, he led her to believe their’s was a serious relationship. And you know, for what it’s worth, he did seem “really happy” to see her in those pics where she tipped the paparazzi? He was happy, he’s never ever been that happy in Jen’s presence that I recall. Had she kept her mouth shut and kept this relationship on the down low, who knows? Maybe he would have actually realized he was in love with her too… now he probably hates her. That young woman that was in his home that was sweet, nice and funny that cared for his kids and listened to him talk endlessly about himself, he destroyed that woman’s dreams, she feels used and she is out for revenge, she is making his life a living hell and that is what her PR crisis team told her to do, Ben’s PR team should be ashamed that they were outplayed by the nanny’s PR team.

    • captain says:

      Do you think it’s revenge? Hm, I’m not so sure. I think she was indeed led to believe it was serious, and was elated. But I doubt her heart got broken. I think perhaps she was livid when after all the love and expectations, he gave her money and expected to just quitely disappear. She wanted fame, she thinks fame looks good on her, so she went after it. Not out of revenge, it was what she always wanted.

  45. Kori says:

    Re: not suing the tabloids. There’s the possibility that a lawsuit resulting in depositions under oath could result in part of not all of the NDA being nullified. That could open a whole can of worms that both Ben and Jen would rather remain sealed.

  46. Kat Matz says:

    I doubt this will happen. Disney owns ABC, the network Bachelorette and DWTS is on. Disney is a clean cut, family oriented company…no controversy. There is no way they will have someone with this type of reputation be on the Bachelorette or DWTS. It’s just not going to happen.
    “E” Network may give her a deal, however, especially if she has a sex tape of her with Ben or whomever. (Seriously believe this might exist)

    • Christin says:

      I’m trying to imagine how she would be introduced or what she would talk about during the sidebar interviews.

      Would she be just referred to as a ‘former nanny to celebrities’? And what career highlights would she have? Even the d-listers have something to reflect upon.

  47. Eru says:

    Poor thing. She really doesnt understand that this is her literally 15 minutes of fame and it will go away pretty fast. And everyone will stop caring about her.

    The Bachelorette? I mean she wants to be THE ONE and 20 men to compete for her? I mean what can she offer them? Her money or royal title?

  48. DEB says:

    Jesus, imagine “building a career” by banging a movie star. *huge eye roll*

  49. Tilly says:

    NDAs are common practice when working for celebs, high flying business types or anyone who is keen to protect their privacy, so that’s unsurprising to me. For her, it will mean she can’t talk about the ins and outs of the family or what she did whilst working for them; it does not, however, extend to discussing her subsequent ‘relationship’ with Ben (although she may not be able to talk about what they ‘did’ whilst she was employed by them).

    I suspect Nanny is thinking that she would be very successful on DWTS or The Bachelor because everyone loves supporting an underdog which is how she sees herself, but she doesn’t realise that’s not how other people view her. Still, she may as well try and milk her 15 minutes of fame as best she can before she disappears into oblivion.

    She seems to be the sort who’s desperate to fit in … by this, I mean buying a status car that she thinks everyone will be impressed with (depends on where you come from, I guess); and wearing what I believe are counterfeit Cartier bracelets (because the inscription is a bit skewiff – could be the resolution on my screen when I enlarged the picture though, so don’t quote me on that!!!). We’ve seen her shop at Sears and lug the same handbag (which is based on a Prada design but isn’t), so she’s probably in essence a lot more ‘homely’ than people realise – i.e., she’s not used to living this sort of lifestyle – if she was, she’d be a heck of a lot more ‘showy’.

    I’m sure the paps documenting her every move will be encouraging her to go for DWTS or The Bachelor, because more stories about her will result in more clicks and $$$$ for them.

  50. Michele says:

    I can’t believe this chubby little thing, was a thing to Ben Affleck in anyway shape of form. Truly shocking what men will DO while intoxicated. She’s maybe a 5.

  51. stinky says:

    i have that denim top she’s wearing.
    it is RIDICULOUSLY expensive.
    im ashamed to even admit what i paid 🙁

  52. HS says:

    For some reason, the image of the nanny presenting him with a bottle of champagne *really* bothers me. My stomach rolls thinking of her taking care of their children.

  53. aang says:

    I find the comments about how this woman is not good enough to be with Affleck because she is short / average / chubby / wears the wrong denim etc., to be really gross. I am so glad I don’t live in LA if this woman is considered ugly. He chose the wrong side piece and is paying the price. The fact that she is not letting you all slut shame her and refuses be bullied into contrition makes me root for her.

  54. LAK says:

    Of course she is….

  55. Lippy says:

    She shouldn’t show off her thunder thighs.