Cate Blanchett: They call me a ‘Hollywood actress’ when they want to ‘insult’ me

cate2

Cate Blanchett might be headed for yet another Oscar nomination this year for her work in Todd Haynes’ Carol, an adaptation of a Patricia Highsmith story. In the LGBTQ community, the story was always beloved because it features a lesbian romance with a “happy ending,” as in, no one dies. While it doesn’t feel like Blue Jasmine all over again – which is when Cate had the Best Actress race wrapped up in the summer of 2013 – it does feel like Cate and Rooney Mara are probably going to be all over this awards season. So Cate’s presence on the latest issue of the New York Times’ T Magazine (their Style magazine) seems like a preview of coming attractions. You can read the T Magazine piece here – Cate sounds sort of pretentious here, but she’s also kind of funny, like she knows she comes across like a fart-sniffing artiste at times. Cate also explains why it’s the worst insult in the world to call her a “Hollywood actress.”

She once drove her kids to the edge of a volcano: “It was fantastic to be able to say, I’m deciding to do this. I’m deciding the level of safety for my children without someone telling me what to do.”

What she learned by running a theatre company: “I learned to not feel responsible to other people’s perceptions of who you are. I suppose I’ve gone through a process of maturation, in a way, because running the company is a public position.”

She hates being called a “Hollywood actress.” “That’s what they say about you when they want to insult you.”

Her advice to young actresses: So not go on social media, which “creates a culture of self-consciousness.”

Her love for novelist Patricia Highsmith: “She writes so fearlessly — and often ambiguously, but often ferociously — about human relationships and the human heart. I always have this terrible sense of foreboding, like a thrilling sense of foreboding, like something terrible is going to unfold. Like you never feel safe.”

Monologue sucks, collaboration is where it’s at: “That’s the dangerous side. You really don’t know where you’re going to go.”

[From The NYT]

While I like that Cate is still fighting the good fight about social media and stoking an air of mystery around oneself, at this point, it does feel like a lost cause. Most actors are on social media in some way and it’s fine. Personally, I think Cate would be awesome at Instagram, and if she was on Twitter, she could raise money and awareness for her offbeat art and side-projects. As for calling her a “Hollywood actress” as an insult… um? She has two Oscars. She IS a Hollywood actress. She’s also an Aussie actress, a stage actress, an art-house actress and everything else.

Here’s the new trailer for Carol… I love when Todd Haynes does ‘50s stuff. He has a really eye for period detail.

cate1

Covers courtesy of T Magazine.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

103 Responses to “Cate Blanchett: They call me a ‘Hollywood actress’ when they want to ‘insult’ me”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. klaas says:

    May I add working actress.

  2. Angie says:

    She has been considered a Hollywood actress since Elizabeth. Maybe she meant that she doesn’t want to be associated with the big studio Hollywood crap? Then again she’s been in the Lord of the Rings and Hobbit series.. Everyone knows she’s awesome in every performance.

  3. Peggy says:

    Someone is getting a bigger head.

    • Snazzy says:

      Seems like it, doesn’t it? I love her as an actress, but it is true that these last few interviews I’ve found her to be quite annoying. Sad, really.

    • Emma - the JP Lover says:

      @Peggy, who wrote: “Someone is getting a bigger head.”

      Cate’s talent gives her the right to a ‘bigger head.’ She doesn’t ‘smell’ her own PR like Kate Winslet. Cate Blanchett is the real deal and still attempts to grow as an actress. I believe typical ‘Hollywood Actresses’ are content to rest on their PR status and red carpet gigs while playing the same character in films over and over again. ‘This’ is what I think Cate meant by saying, “They call you a Hollywood actress when they want to insult you.” There is nothing typical about Cate and there is nothing wrong in ‘owning’ your talent with confidence.

      • Franca says:

        Why would it give her the “right” to a bigger head? Nothing gives you the right to be arrogant.

      • Kiki says:

        @Emma, you have a point, it probably was worded wrong or people just don’t her words very lightly. But Cate can sound pretty annoying when she is ready. But I do like what she is saying about “Hollywood Actress.” There’s is no denying the fact that she is an acclaimed actress and deserves the much recognition, and if you ask me, if she “pretentious”, she has every right to be. She is an actress, for like what over 20 years, she should have a big head. Unlike, most “hollywood actress” who think they have just arrive, has nothing compared to Cate Blancett, or Kate Winslet or any other actress who took their craft to a whole levels in their over the years profession.

    • K says:

      The more she talks the less I like her. She just comes across as arrogant and filled with delusions of grandeur. She is talented but not that amazing. Probably good she doesn’t have social media. Of course she was pretty dead to me after her bitching about having to name the designer who lent her a dress for her to be handed a trophy for playing pretend. Especially since most wouldn’t know who she was without the red carpet. Now she is to good to be called a Hollywood actress. Ok fine go away.

    • Neah23 says:

      I feel the same way she became very off putting lately.

    • Franca says:

      She got full of herself a long time ago. The more she talks the less I like her.

      • Kelly says:

        I know. This is distressing.

        I lost respect for her when she starred in the Woody Allen movie. Maybe I am unrealistic, but as far as I’m concerned he is a pedophile. The number of people that work with him appalls me.

        At the level of stardom or whatever, we aren’t talking about the necessity of a job to put food on the table for your children.

        I feel the same way, no stronger, about Polanski. Another great director with NO morals.

    • chelsea says:

      Not to mention getting terribly defensive. She sounds paranoid.

  4. kay says:

    She should stick to the stage, in films she is over the top and so cold. I just don’t like her stiff acting.

  5. Jegede says:

    She’s getting further, and further up her own ar$e with each interview.

    • annaloo. says:

      I might tell Cate to “have a seat” about her high-falutin talk here, but I have to admit, I would probably pull up a seat next to her with a bottle of bourbon!

  6. BengalCat2000 says:

    I thought Blue Jasmine was a terrible movie. She sounds fine here, no more pretentious than any other actress. Her face is mesmerizing, those cheekbones!

    • Kiddo says:

      I thought she played Cate Blanchett as a woman who drinks, in the film. Maybe because I watched it after all of the hoopla and awards? I couldn’t completely stay in suspension of disbelief, it broke several times. I caught myself watching Cate act instead of the character living her life. Or maybe it was the writing?

      • BengalCat2000 says:

        I think it was the writing and the acting. His movies haven’t been good in years, imo. I was ready to throw my cocktail at the TV at the end during that stupid soliloquy she gave. I will always love her as an actress, but will be forever stupified by the success of that movie.

  7. GoodNamesAllTaken says:

    She is stunningly beautiful. That face is incredible. I don’t like her at all though. Woody Allen is a big part of the reason, but I also find her so smug and “Hollywood deep.” Very trite. But I’m sure she wouldn’t mind, since she doesn’t feel responsible for other people’s perceptions of who she is. I thought that was an odd way to put it. I have certainly learned not to care as much whether people like me or not, but to a certain extent, I’m responsible for their perception of who I am. Not completely – some people will judge you for superficial reasons – what you look like, who you’re married to, how much money you have…that’s coming from their own prejudices. But if I act like a smug, conceited brat, I’m responsible for the perception that I’m a smug, conceited brat, am I not?

    • BengalCat2000 says:

      @GNAT, you just described GooP for me, minus the Woody Allen. I struggle with my enjoyment of his movies. I appreciate everything you said tho.

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        I dont think you should feel bad for liking his movies. Some of them were good. She took it several steps further by working with him, praising him and helping him profit and flourish in spite of his despicable behavior.

      • Snazzy says:

        I have the same issue – with his and Roman Polanski’s movies 🙁

    • Franca says:

      I always thought she was interesting lookin, butbeautifu? Not even close.

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        I have a thing for huge cheekbones.

      • Pinky Rose says:

        Same here GoodNames! You surely must like Katharine Hepburn and Hedy Lamarr faces then…They were all cheekbones

      • Franca says:

        See, Katharine and Hedy I find stunning. And Hedy, being an inovator, is the coolest actress ever. Ever.

        Cate has nice cheekbones, but her eyes I find cold and small.

      • Pinky Rose says:

        Hedy is just on another level (thank you Hedy for the actual wi-fi)! Agree on both points though I LOVE Cate’s face, but yeah the great (and only) Kate Hepburn and Hedy are probably one of the most beautiful women ever.

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        Yes, Pinky Rose – love KH and Hedy! @Franca – it’s funny how differently people perceive “beautiful” isn’t it? There’s something about her skin and coloring – admittedly part of it is even her makeup, that I just find very pretty. It’s fine that not everyone does. i even think she has sort of an ugly nose, but the overall effect to me is still pretty. I wonder where we get into our heads what is and isn’t beautiful? It’s interesting to me.

  8. Darkladi says:

    Get over yourself, already

  9. MrsBPitt says:

    She finds the term “Hollywood actress” insulting…then give back your two Oscars, and stop making “Hollywood” films…Problem fixed!!!! Of course, I’m sure she doesn’t find the “Hollywood” paychecks insulting!!!

    • Don't kill me I'm French says:

      +1
      She is a Hollywood actress

    • siri says:

      Right!

    • Crumpet says:

      Exactly. That ‘insult’ is what has given her most of what she has. So… give me a break Cate.

    • Diane says:

      I would think Meryl Streep would find that insulting!

    • meme says:

      ^THIS. I find her to be extremely arrogant and hypocritical and sort of stuck up. Very off putting.

    • msd says:

      Where did she say that she finds it insulting? She said it’s a term people often use to be insulting, which is true.

      Commenters on Celebitchy use “Hollywood” as an insult all the time! As in, “oh shut up, you’re just a stupid Hollywood actress”. It’s used to dismiss people a lot more than it’s ever used as a compliment.

  10. Snowpea says:

    She’s awesome. Some people get away with this sort of blarney and Cates one of em.

    Imagine if Gwyneth talked like this? Barf. But Cate gets away with it. She’s thespian royalty!

  11. Norman Bates' Mother says:

    She is a Hollywood actress, but I think she’s right – these days many people tend to use phrases including the words Hollywood or celebrity as insults. Hollywood is associated with everything bad and evil about show-business. When someone wants to describe an actor they like, more often than not, they will simply say actor/actress or Australian/American/British (et al.) actor/actress. Wording is a key.

    As for the social media stuff – one can be mysterious and seemingly humble and still use social media, when they do it sparsely and responsibly, but as a person, who doesn’t use it, she probably only ever sees the loudest, more fame-hungry examples and those are annoying. How can anyone be treated seriously, when there are million selfies or shots of their ass or six-pack on Instagram and their Twitter feed consists mainly of humble-brags and TMI stuff no one needs too know?

    • Amy Tennant says:

      I agree. It’s subtle shade, especially on occasions when the person is talking about some serious issue, and people make a point to describe someone as a “Hollywood actress.” The implication there is that your statement is not credible, that you don’t have a brain in your head, and people should dismiss your concerns out of hand. I could see it as sexist, too, although I think they do the same thing to male celebrities, calling them “Hollywood actors.” It’s basically a way to dismiss whatever the person said without even considering it.

  12. Amelia says:

    I quite enjoyed that trailer. There were no giant spoilers, it didn’t give away the entire plot in 30 seconds and still retained a little bit of ambiguity.
    I might go and see this now.

  13. Jas says:

    Social media is the norm now. Our culture has changed with iPhones, high speed internet, social media, everybody has a camera on their phone now, there’s no escaping it unfortunately. Everybody’s more self conscious now because anything you do in public can be filmed and broadcast to the entire world in seconds. There is no privacy.

    A highly controlled social media account designed to make you look good and appeal to your demographics is the best publicity nowadays. People are far more trusting of a celebrity denying something on Instagram that seems to come directly from them then a statement from a publicist. If you have millions of followers that’s an immediate audience for advertising for your movies/products without having to go anywhere or do anything. I think a lot of older people don’t realise how massively technology has changed mainstream culture, media and marketing. A modern kid can’t do it the way they did it in the olden days. It’s an alien culture to the pre internet/technology age.

    • ell says:

      i’m in my 20s, so I’m not pre internet. I get what you’re saying, but we also can’t ignore that social media does lead to overexposure and it gets really tiring. I deleted fb because I had enough of seeing/knowing everything about people I don’t even care for and hated people knowing everything about me, it was fun for a bit then it got exhausting. I love taking selfies/pics and share them with my family & close friends, it feels much more meaningful and intimate. I know quite a few people around my age who feel the same and got rid of social media or use it sparingly.

      I understand that for a celebrity it can be a useful tool, but lbr most of them use it like morons – twitter fights, oversharing… it’s not even funny anymore.

      • Cran says:

        I have the good fortune of being born pre-Internet. It amazes me that people expose so much of their lives on social media. No one is that interesting. NO ONE.

  14. Kiddo says:

    So who is ‘they’?

    • Mispronounced Name Dropper says:

      You’re not who you think you are. You’re not who other people think you are. You’re who you think other people think you are.

      I hope that answers your question.

      • Kiddo says:

        It doesn’t. She makes it sound as though there are real life people conspiring to call her a Hollywood Actress, as a means of insulting her. Like there is this implied intent that she reads into someone using that moniker. Who are these people? Or is this a way for Cate to tell everyone that she is NOT a Hollywood Actress, even though she acts, and is attached to Hollywood? When ‘they’ use the term Hollywood Actress for other actresses, is it consistently an insult, or only when ‘they’ use the term for Cate?

        Is Cate actually insulting Hollywood Actresses?

    • FingerBinger says:

      @Kiddo Theatre people?

      • Kiddo says:

        Well, if she is ashamed of being a Hollywood actress, in those circles, she can always quit film and do theater work exclusively, right? Or she can skip the Academy Awards as a boycott of the ‘insulting’ industry association.

    • Algernon says:

      I think maybe she means the Australian public/press? I’ve heard from Aussies who come to LA to work that there’s a real resentment within the Aussie film/TV community, that all their best talent ends up leaving Oz to make Hollywood movies, few of which film in Australia, so they lose talent and they’re not making the same kind of filming revenue countries like the US, Canada, and the UK are. Australia has a healthy film/TV industry of its own, but it is kind of true that as soon as an actor has some degree of fame in Oz, they come here to work and they rarely take work back to Oz. Like they love Baz Luhrman down there because he’s so dedicated to getting big productions made in Australia and promoting Aussie technicians and craftsmen and women. I’ve heard similar things about France, that they come down hard on people like Marion Cotillard who make a lot of US-produced movies, but they love Audrey Tatou because she went back to France and makes mostly French movies despite finding success in the US.

      • Jonathan says:

        Australians have long gotten used to the fact that if one wants to be a big success, one has to go overseas. We just don’t have a big enough market here for people to become mega huge. The population of our whole country is only about as big as the population of some major cities overseas. So it’s nothing new that an Aussie goes to the States or the UK to become a big star.

        What we do have in Australia though is a culture that prides itself on egalitarianism and humility. If someone thinks their talents or achievements sets them above other people, they’re cut down by the rest of society (referred to as the “Tall Poppy Syndrome”).

        Ms Blanchett is absolutely adored by most Australians, she’s a national treasure. Yes, she is a bit up herself, but mostly tolerated because she maintains other treasured Australian national characteristics such as bluntness and honesty.

      • ellie says:

        I was nodding my head along until you mentioned “national treasure”. Jesus that sounded pompous. I wouldn’t go that far.

  15. ncboudicca says:

    I might see this because of Todd Haynes. I sat through Far from Heaven just blown away by how gorgeous it was.

  16. Tilly says:

    I adore the actor Princess Cate (which is how she’d probably prefer to be known) but in ‘real life’ she really does have foot in mouth disease in some interviews, saying the wrong thing and coming across as extremely egotistical.

    She’s also a teeny bit selective in telling the truth too, as in her recent(ish) interview where she was hitting back at mothers who look her up and down at the school gate, she swore that she’s never had a nanny, yet she definitely did before she moved to her (currently listed for sale) Hunter’s Hill House.

    She’s an incredible talent though, and I don’t think anyone would think badly of her if she just came out and said she has help!

    I’ve seen Cate up close and personal and she is absolutely gorgeous – surprisingly normal (as in a few wrinkles here and there) but just lovely.

    • Pinky Rose says:

      She did not swore she hadn’t had a nanny. Actually in a profile that the New Yorker did of her back in 2007, she talks about having help and even the nanny is mentioned taking her son Roman to the park.

  17. Tracy says:

    Kate, if you’re going to do big Hollywood films, then you’re a ‘Hollywood Actress’ just as you are many other things. Maybe not biting the hand that feeds you is a better way to go. Poor you.

  18. siri says:

    She makes most of her money from those big HW productions, so she needs to get off some horse here. She also is not the second coming, there’s plenty of talent in HW.

  19. Jayna says:

    Doesn’t she do a lot of British films also? I loved the British movie, Notes on a Scandal. The budget was only 15 million total.

    Maybe she just means that doesn’t sum up who she is as an actress, just one part, Hollywood movies. She and her husband are involved in theatre in Australia and helps him but also acts in theatre there, like right now. She has worked in Australian movies. She’s developing a TV series in Australia and it is set to be her first directing turn, directing the series. .

  20. Naddie says:

    She’s a pain. In one interview, the guy asked how was to guide a cat on a leash in the film Cinderella, as she laughed and asked back “is that your f**ing question?”.
    It’s not a great question, but she didn’t have to be so unpleasant.

    • Jessica says:

      She was playing along with a bit the interviewer was doing. They all had a laugh about it.

    • Jayna says:

      It’s called humor in the interview. Taking it out of context much?

      • Naddie says:

        Actually, I did. I was reading a post and the person who’s done it made it seem like she was mocking him. Taking back what I said, I still think she’s a pain.

    • Jorts (Kitten) says:

      I’d actually like to know her answer. My cat just flops on his side when I take him out on his leash.

  21. GlimmerBunny says:

    My mom feels about her the way I feel about Jennifer Lawrence – she absolutely adores EVERYTHING about her: her films, her looks, her style, her personality – she even bought the perfume she models for. I find her sort of Ice Queen-y, both in looks and personality.

    • Pinky Rose says:

      Your mom and I should be friends lol. And yes, she projects an icy like quality but you should see her interviews (like the Ellen Degeneres one), she is pretty funny and quite lovely with everyone.

  22. InvaderTak says:

    But she is a Hollywood actress. She did “Kingdom of the Crystal Skull” why again? I doubt it was for the art.

  23. ell says:

    I don’t see how hollywood actress is an insult, it’s just meant to indicate a certain amount of status in the community, which surely should be fine? it’s not diminishing.

    i agree on the social media issue though; it was cute for about a minute but most of them overuse it, not to mention often expose themselves as ignorant idiots who don’t know when to make an exit. less is more in this case.

    • Kiddo says:

      Yeah, if she was relegated to “Hollywood Celebrity” or “Star” I could see that being used as an insult, because it doesn’t mention the craft. I’m a little bit sick of her. She doesn’t use social media when she’s hawking for awards, but she becomes insanely overexposed with magazine articles. The end result is the same.

    • Alice says:

      I don’t hate those who use social media(I don’t visit their pages), but most of my favorites do not use it. I like a bit of mystery. They’re not my relatives, I don’t need to see their vacation or christening pictures.

      • Tilly says:

        … or what they ate for breakfast/lunch/dinner … and definitely NOT what product they’re plugging for the moment – some don’t know when to stop!

      • ell says:

        @Tilly, that’s my major issue. some don’t seem to know when to stop EVER. and this is true not just for celebs, but everyone. so much oversharing.

  24. SamiHami says:

    And what about that volcano story? Is that supposed to be a big deal? I lived in Hawaii as a child and took a 4th grade field trip to a volcano, and yes, I went right up to the edge. It’s really not that amazing a thing for her to feel so empowered by.

    • Franca says:

      I don’t know if I read it right – but she meant she was completely responsible about her kids without anyone telling her what to do? Because NO- If there are safety rules you follow the damn safety rules.
      Plitvice Lakes is a famous national park here in Croatia and every year tourists have accidents because they go off trail to get a better picture. One woman died this year.

  25. Viv says:

    I still remember the beginning of her SAG acceptance speech-

    “I’ve been away from the film industry for a long time making theater.” (Darling)

    She tries so damn hard to cultivate this avant garde image- more W magazine, never People, exclusive potato vodka, NOT beer, She’s a good actress, but she definitely believes her own hype, and she wants the Hollywood paycheques without the Hollywood title.

    Plus the whole Woody Allen thing was beyond gross, but I can see her putting her ‘craft’ above anything so plebeian as morals. She’s an artistic soul after all.

    • Cynthia says:

      +1. She isn’t above promoting her movies à la Hollywood though. For example hinting at having had relationship with women to drum up interest and then denying when it becomes big news.

      • siri says:

        I thought I was the only one thinking that. She knew exactly what she was doing-there was no misunderstanding from the interviewer’s side.

  26. Artemis says:

    That is implying that she is aware of people’s perception about Hollywood (it has no real value) thus her being part of that system, devalues her art and talent. Which is ridiculous as like most actors she switches between money-making opportunities and more artsy films (and Hollywood CAN provide both), it’s understandable pragmatism to ensure her position in Hollywood. She is a good survivor. Unless she wants to deny she uses other ventures such as fashion to fatten her bank account so she has more freedom in her acting choices?

    The reason why she has the status she has and is living a life full of opportunities is not only because of her obvious acting talents. It’s because she thrives in the Hollywood system while maintaining acting credibility which is rare. She has the perfect balance of being a Moviestar and an Actor, of being visible yet hidden and mysterious.

    Sadly, she is so stuck up and narrow-minded that she sneers at being called a Hollywood actress when she should be thankful.

  27. jinni says:

    She was in an Indiana Jones movie, a part of one of the biggest movie franchises of all time (LOTR) , and was just recently in a Disney movie for heaven’s sake. She couldn’t get more Hollywood if she tried.

  28. Alyce says:

    The thrill is gone between me and Kate. She comes off as way too pretentious. She’s the one who started the whole, “don’t ask what I’m wearing on the red carpet” thing right? Sigh… And I used to think she was cool!

  29. Pinky Rose says:

    The “Hollywood actress” thing is mostly related to how most people in Australia dismissed her capacity at running the Sidney Theather Company and how vocal she was about arts role in society. You should have read all those articles saying she only got the job because of her fame and more related stuff. Obviously she prove them wrong and made the company even more successful. So that is what she is referring

    The interview is super fun (the House of Cards shade lol) but as usual she is very guarded about her life. Which is rarity and great, but it does not make a interesting interview. This stuff she has been saying for the last few years (and I say that as I’m her fan and have read most of her interviews).

    • Kiddo says:

      But she IS a Hollywood Actress. why take it as a pejorative, even if someone intended it? And even if she was quite capable, no one can deny that the notoriety from Hollywood DOES indeed provide influence.

      • Pinky Rose says:

        Obviously, she IS a Hollywood actress and that was part of the success of her job in the STC (without her notoriety, neither her friends like Giorgio Armani, James Packer would have contributed economically or it would not have been plays directed by Liv Ullman) But that is what most critics of her position said “oh she is just a Hollywood actress, she doesn’t have what it takes to run the company” to undermined her capability. It was use as a denigrating phrase within the context (and also last year when she made that speech at a former prime minister funeral, most of the things you would read on the press, most of the digs were highlighting the fact that she is an actress). I get why it can get tedious, even if she is that (which she doesn’t deny either, otherwise she would not be promoting the film since Cannes or fronting Giorgio Armani latest ad)

      • Kiddo says:

        Fair enough Pinky

  30. meme says:

    I hate to break this to her, but Carol is going to tank at the box office.

  31. kri says:

    she tells is at she sees it. She is gorgeous and talented beyond, but her thing with Woody puts me off. She is a H’wood actress of course, but also more than that. LOL on the “insult”. Megan Fox is a Hollywood actress, as is JLaw. I’m thinking she’s getting at the marketing/public type of actress with that remark. Whatever. I’m just here to say that Patricia Highsmith is one of the most interesting literary figures to have ever put pen to paper. Brilliant, twisted, scary and fearless.

  32. frisbee says:

    Used to like her, had a problem with her since she worked with Woody Allen. I didn’t see Blue Jasmine and have no intention of ever seeing that or any of his films. He’s in the same box as Roman Polanski for me. I can’t be doing with actors who support either of these pervs (for the sake of their careers) despite the child abuse associated with them.

  33. morc says:

    She’s a bit full of herself, while coming off as cardboardy.
    On the basis of Hollywood Actors, don’t tell me you do it for the craft.
    There are two reasons it had to be Hollywood:
    1. Narcissism
    2. $$$

  34. LAK says:

    Todd Haynes + Patricia Highsmith + Cate Blanchett= heaven!!!

  35. talia says:

    How i read it, she doesn’t say that she is insulted by it. But that people say it about her when they want to insult her. That’s different…

    • Pinky Rose says:

      Perfectly said.

    • perplexed says:

      In the original article it says she frowns when the term “Hollywood actress” is mentioned. And then I think the journalist deduces that she doesn’t like the term. Because she frowns I think she might be insulted by the term.

    • E says:

      Completely agree! She did not sound like she was saying she is insulted by this AT ALL.

      Also, I’m sure this is referencing theatre people. That is where being a Hollywood/ film actress is a lower form ( to them) because you get multiple takes and editing so really someone can get away with giving a fairly s!$t performance but have it spliced to look good, where as on stage you have to deliver start to finish, every single time.

  36. A.Key says:

    Bet a Hollywood paycheck isn’t an insult though.
    I don’t get the fuss about her, never have. She’s good at her job, and that’s it. Nothing special to look at, not particularly brilliant without a script to put words in her mouth either it seems.

  37. Deedee says:

    Don’t women who work in theater and who are serious about their craft prefer to be called actors? Even women who are drum majors in the high school band would look at you funny if you called them a “majorette” these days.

  38. lola says:

    Pretentious.

    And such thirst for her third? Tread lightly, woman. Tread lightly.

  39. Lamppost says:

    If you don’t want to be known as a Hollywood actress then stop taking film jobs.