Comments on: Britney Spears’ Circus tour feeling the recession; Brit is not engaged

By: Shandi

Shandi — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 04:33:10 +0000

LOL at MSat-
Christina Aguilera’s show wasn’t really all that great and I completely agree with yadira that she obviously still thinks she is in the circus with her horrid hair and wretched makeup! She is sooo ugly and has never been more successful than Britney as far as sales of cd’s or tour tickets.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: britney is amazing

britney is amazing — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:29:41 +0000

The show was amazing. I went to the staples center on 4-16 and I was speecheless. Britney is amazing, and she’s a good dancer. Britney fans don’t give a damn if she doesn’t sing, we’re the ones paying to go see her, so she should make a second US tour cuz I will definetly buy my tickets. Britney is a living legend.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: IFHM

IFHM — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:21:24 +0000

Gee that’s too bad, maybe if we try hard enough we can get her to just give it up totally ’cause she is a has-been and totally SUCKS!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Monalicious

Monalicious — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:56:15 +0000

KISS did a “Psycho Circus” tour in 1999 as well. Rocked hard!!!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Lina

Lina — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:21:40 +0000

@ StaN: I was wondering the same thing…

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: JaundiceMachine

JaundiceMachine — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:41:43 +0000

Interesting point regarding Brit’s role as the “ringmaster”, Greg. I suppose it would be psychologically easier for her to tour if she could a) be in control of the “Circus” and b) slip into the background if she starts to f*ck up the choreography.

I find it hard to believe this tour was “her idea” when she puts so little into it. Seriously – isn’t she a bit past her prime?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Michelle

Michelle — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:17:01 +0000

It just stands to reason that if you are going to a concert, the main attraction should be the singing of the artist you are forking over your hard-earned cash to see. Can you imagine, say, the Rolling Stones, lipsynching and having an entire troupe of dancers and acrobats? What’s the point of all the sideshow crap? It’s distracting, tacky, unprofessional, and screams “coverup for lack of actual talent” to watch Britney “perform”.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Greg

Greg — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:24:42 +0000

Much like a circus it is not the ringmaster you concentrate on the whole time. Thus it takes the pressure off of Britney’s performance.
I do read many accounts that Britney is actually singing. Still I don’t why people comment on singers performances when they have no idea what it takes to accomplish this feat.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Girl from Denmark

Girl from Denmark — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:17:20 +0000

To Zoe:

You´re so right!!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Zoe (The Other One)

Zoe (The Other One) — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:59:57 +0000

This talentless oxygen thief was only marginally interesting when she was climbing The Stairway to Crazy.

Now she’s just a slightly overweight mum of two in ill fitting clothes mouthing along to a backing track. If youse want a circus go see Cirque du Soleil or something and stop putting money in this fame wh0res grubby little mitts.

Report this comment as spam or abuse