Sandra Bullock’s beau Bryan Randall is ‘so in love’ and wants ‘more children’

Premiere Of Warner Bros. Pictures' "Our Brand Is Crisis"

Sandra Bullock seems to have found her dream man in boyfriend Bryan Randall. He has embraced Sandra’s kids – her 6-year-old son Louis and the newest addition to her family, 3-year-old Laila and has hinted that he might want even more kids with Sandy, going so far as to give up one of his biggest vices.

Sandra is usually pretty tight-lipped about her personal life, but while promoting Our Brand is Chaos (Remember that? Yeah, me neither), she gave People magazine exclusive insider details. Sparks ignited between Sandra and Bryan when he photographed son Louis’ graduation from kindergarten. The couple have been together for a year now and Bryan moved in to Sandra’s house this past fall. A source close to the couple told US Weekly that Bryan “has taken on the role of raising the two kids with Sandra” and added, “He’s talking about wanting more children.”

Bryan seems to be wholly committed to having a lasting relationship with Sandra and the kids. US Weekly’s insider says that Bryan “went so far as to quit cigarettes cold turkey. That’s huge — he was a chain-smoker!” Other sources close to the couple have told the magazine that “Bryan and Sandra are total homebodies” and that “Sandra is a great mom. She’s very attentive.” Not only is Sandra a perfect Mom, but Bryan is a “child whisperer.” Sounds like a match made in heaven.

I do think Sandra and Bryan make good parents – especially Sandra, who tries her best to keep Lois and Laila out of the limelight, but more kids? She’s 51 and he’s 49. Don’t they want to enjoy the “empty nest” at some point in lives?

Premiere Of Warner Bros. Pictures' "Our Brand Is Crisis"

Photo credit: WENN.com, Getty Images

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

28 Responses to “Sandra Bullock’s beau Bryan Randall is ‘so in love’ and wants ‘more children’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. mkyarwood says:

    … even if he’s good with kids, it’s creepy to call anyone a child whisperer. Also, if I were her, I’d take it a little slower this time. Either she knew about her previous husband’s nazi insanity and didn’t care, or she was completely oblivious. Neither really scream ‘great mother’ to me.

    • Maya says:

      Even if she didn’t know about her ex husband she knows about Chelsea Handler being a racist and yet Sandra is best friends with her.

      Sandra is not the sweet woman image she has created – married to a Nazi, best friends with a racist and now dating a man who has been to jail.

      • celine says:

        x 10000 To me, she’s deep in the closet, not that there’s anything bad with that, but she tries so hard at the fauxmances. Not buying it.

      • Bridget says:

        Sandra Bullock is friends with just about everyone in Hollywood, and Chelsea Handler got set up with work friendships by her representation. Why do you think she was in the pics where Randall and Sandra “debuted” their relationship, which we know was a quid pro quo so no one would print pics of her foster daughter until the adoption was official?

      • Nicole says:

        Can anyone say “Federline”! He was a good father, too.
        Given that they are up in age for children, Any man that pushes within a year to have a child together, look out.

        She met her first husband because she took him to meet Jessy james.
        She met this one because she took son to get pictures taken.

        Anyone see a pattern?!

        Save this woman before this turns into another “I got your back, mistake.”

    • JenniferJustice says:

      Agreed. I’m all for anybody “finding love” but moving a man into your kids’ home so soon leaves a really bad taste in my mouth – a taste of selfishness. That is not just her home anymore. It is her children’s home and it’s not like they can go anywhere else. She strikes me as the type that if she were asked about that, she would respond with something along the lines of “oh, but they love him. They wanted him to move in” which is not the point at all. You don’t move people into your kids’ home. And if you dare ask them how they feel about it, shame on you. it’s not their call and you dont’ get to manipulate and call it good.

    • Jaded says:

      She’s been nothing but a good mother – that comment is ridiculous.

  2. Snazzy says:

    I think when you have kids older you don’t really care about the whole empty nest thing. Or at least not as much as when people have kids younger. I have a friend who had her first kid at 46 (not for lack of trying!) and she doesn’t even think about when he leaves: she just wants to enjoy every moment with him as it took her so long to get him. I imagine Sandy may be thinking the same thing. And I am sure the nannies ensure that there is sufficient alone time (no shade – if you can afford it, why not?).

    • HappyMom says:

      Agreed. If her kids were a lot older I’d think nah-why start all over. But her kids are still really little-she absolutely could add on to her family in the near future.

    • Esmom says:

      Yeah, it’s almost like the process is reversed when you have kids at a later age — the enjoyment people get from an empty nest is likely similar to the lifestyle you enjoyed for quite a while before having kids. That said, I would find it really hard to chase after three young kids at pretty much any age. I don’t think she needs to rush into expanding her family.

  3. Maya says:

    Why is Sandra revealing so much about this relationship? She used to be very private but with this man she is pulling an Aniston. Going to the media with she is so happy and in love, never been happier and wants more children etc.

    • FingerBinger says:

      She’s still private. She’s not tweeting every thought. There hasn’t been a peep out of her since she adopted her daughter.

    • Bridget says:

      She didn’t have a choice if you remember – she gave the Randall info in exchange for outlets like People not publishing pics of her and Laila while she was her foster daughter. There are serious, heavy duty rules about publishing pictures of children in foster care, and had any of the outlets compromised Laila’s privacy Sandra had a very real possibility of having the adoption fall through.

      • lucy2 says:

        And beyond that I don’t think she’s said a word about the relationship. This whole article is based off a “source” in Us Weekly and probably mostly made up. I haven’t seen a news story about her, the kids, or her boyfriend in months. How is that not private?

  4. Esther says:

    child whisperer sounds creepy as hell. they should think a bit better what words they are feeding the press.

    if he is so great why not just enjoy time with him instead of plastering it all over the place? or did Mr Clooney advise her?

    • Esmom says:

      Somehow I doubt they fed those words to the press…that sounds like something the press would come up with all on their own. Ick.

  5. JH says:

    She’s 51?!?!??! She looks incredible!

  6. minx says:

    I hope she’s happy and wish her well, I’m just always skeptical.

  7. Kitten says:

    I recently saw some pics of her BF and I couldn’t believe how hot he looked. I didn’t get it until then.

    To me, Sandy is a beautiful woman of mediocre acting ability.

    • Jayna says:

      I love Sandy. I think she’s mediocre in dramas and didn’t deserve the Oscar, but I think she’s absolutely fantastic in comedies.

  8. Squiggisbig says:

    She looks amazing for 51.

    I have older parents and I definitely would not recommend her adding more kids to her family. Empty nest thing aside, when you are 50 years older than your child, even if you keep yourself in excellent health, they will likely have to deal with a number of issues that arises just by virtue of aging that there peers are not.

    But who knows I’m sure in President Trump’s America the rich will probably just harvest the blood of the poors and live forever.

    • Jayna says:

      I don’t really believe that he wants more kids, or that if he did, she is even entertaining that. She adopted a sibling for Louis because he really wanted a sister or brother. She even adopted a child, not a baby, probably so he would have a sibling closer in age to play with. At her age, I doubt she wants to add another one to her family. I would be surprised if she did.

    • Amelie says:

      Well, 51 is the average age for menopause in the U.S. so I’m wondering what the new BF is thinking?

  9. Bridget says:

    This is the most random story. Did they pick Sandra’s name out of a hat? Or did someone give this minor story in exchange for something else not being printed?

  10. Chinoiserie says:

    If your younger child is only 3 having more children would not make the empty nest much earlier. Besides, when their kids would be grown he would probably be retired anyway (who knows when actresses retire) and they are rich and have staff and have had their whole lives without kids so far. So it is not the thing as for other people that want empty nest.