Star: Ben Affleck spent $5k on a romantic dinner for Jennifer Garner

Ben Affleck & Jennifer Garner Take Their Kids To Church After The Farmer's Market

There’s a new article in the print edition of Star Magazine detailing a very expensive dinner that Ben Affleck splurged on with Jennifer Garner, one that cost more than the value of my car. (I have a sh*tty car.) Kaiser typed it in for me and she said that about halfway through she started to suspect it was an ad for the restaurant. It does read like a commercial and it’s possible the source was in the restaurant, but I don’t see how an exclusive place that charges thousands of dollars for a meal thinks that it’s a good idea to plant a story in a gossip rag. Their clientele doesn’t seem like the type to read Star Magazine. Here’s the article from this week’s issue:

Publicly, Jennifer Garner has been taking pains to say that while she and estranged hubby Ben Affleck are on good terms, she’s “moving on” with her life. But behind the scenes, Ben has been trying to win back his wife’s affection ever since his alleged affair with ex-nanny Christine Ouzounian rocked their 10-year marriage last summer. Since their split, the duo have been spotted happily spending Thanksgiving, Christmas and birthdays together with their three children. An insider adds: “Ben’s been inundating Jen with compliments and flowers, anything to win her over and win her back.”

And it could be mission accomplished for Ben: Star has learned exclusively that he and Jen spent the evening of Feb. 9 enjoying what one eyewitness described as a “romantic date night” at an exclusive LA restaurant – and outing that may have “sealed the deal,” says an insider, on a secret reconciliation for the duo.

That evening, Ben’s chauffeur-driven Range Rover rolled up the Hinterland restaurant in Santa Monica. Jen stepped out dressed in a tight black dress and heels, and as they entered the eatery, Ben was the perfect gentleman, helping her remove her coat and pulling out her chair. After settling in at their candlelit table, the couple only had eyes for each other.

“It was all about them. There were no distractions, no calling, no texting. They ordered from the Secret Kitchen menu – there are no prices listed, but appetizers are about $100 each.”

After flirting over caviar, charcuterie and oysters, the couple ordered their first and main courses, with Ben tucking into filet mignon and veal chop, while Jen enjoyed seafood.

“She seemed almost first-date giddy” during the evening, the eyewitness adds. “And when their desserts arrived, they shared the panna cotta, chocolate ganache tarts and gelato with one spoon.”

Their romantic meal lasted three hours and their check totaled $5000 – “Obviously, the cost was no object for Ben when it came to sharing some quality time alone with his wife.”

A source adds: “They’ve vowed to have more date nights” like the one at Hinterland. “That one was the epitome of romance, and it really opened Jen’s eyes to what they could have again. Slowly but surely, she’s seen a change in ben, who has realized he made a monumental mistake – and her heart has begun to melt.”

[From Star Magazine, print edition]

Ok that just made me really hungry, but more like $50 night out hungry not $5,000 hungry. I don’t understand how a meal could total that much, even with $100 dishes, unless they were drinking insanely expensive wine. Even with all the product placement (what is charcuterie? Ok I have had that in Germany at peasant prices) I can believe that they went out to dinner and spent $5k. Their combined net worth is $115 million, it’s not like they can’t afford it.

Apparently OK Magazine has a similar story about their night out, at least I’m assuming they’re referring to the same night.

Do you think they’ll still go through with the divorce? People Magazine suggested that they’re going to file “sometime after their next movies are released in late March” although the language kind of hedged and said an announce “could come.” There was also a lot of verbiage about Garner’s state of mind and how she fought for her marriage and family. I can see these two reuniting yet again. I get the impression that a lot depends on how Batman v. Superman does at the box office, like Ben is basing major life decisions on if he’s able to helm a superhero movie and he’s the one calling the shots.

US Mag has another story about how Ben would change the Batman v. Superman script while he was in the process of filming. That sounds like a nightmare for the cast and crew, like it would cause version control issues for so many different people.

Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner have tense discussion at the Farmers Market

Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner have tense discussion at the Farmers Market

Ben Affleck & Jennifer Garner Stop By Cake Mix In West Hollywood

Photos credit: WENN and Fame. All these photos are from last year

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

63 Responses to “Star: Ben Affleck spent $5k on a romantic dinner for Jennifer Garner”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Zan says:

    I’m a foodie, but there is a limit! 5k… Right in the toilet 😜

    • detritus says:

      I would also classify myself as a foodie and I wish I had that much money. I’d be flying to the Fat Duck and having their 4 hour tasting menu though. or Alinea. Or one of those fabulous looking Peruvian restaurants. I could pay for the flights and as long as we didn’t drink too much and still have some left over from that 5k total.

      • Eleonor says:

        I think for them a 5k dinner it’s like for us a 2 houndred bucks.

      • Missy says:

        My sis spent eight months in Europe with her husband, he’s a very accomplished and somewhat famous chef in Alberta. They went to the fat duck for a special tasting menu, they brought out pigeon and she wouldn’t eat it. Not exactly a delicacy, she was horrified .

      • sienna says:

        Missy, would love to know who your BIL is, as I am an Albertan foodie! Though I have a decent idea if he’s from Calgary ;-).

        That said, I had pigeon at Gordon Ramsay’s signature restaurant in London. I was a bit freaked out when it was served but admittedly it was delish. Why they don’t list it as squab on the menu instead is odd to me.

      • Goodnight says:

        @Missy

        Why was she horrified? Do they serve it in its plumage or something? I’ve always seen squab cooked as a whole bird without its plumage but I’m not sure why someone would be horrified by what looks like a miniature roast chicken unless it was served like a swan or peacock, feathers and all.

    • Pinky says:

      5k out to dinner is nothing to spend on food for me…and my closest 1k friends.

      -TheRealPinky

  2. Ivy says:

    He always looks so miserable.

  3. PomPom says:

    Is he sincere, or is he just fronting for the Batman opening? I think it’s the latter; I just don’t have any clue if Jen is in on it or not

    • Mia V. says:

      She is an idiot.

    • Merritt says:

      She knows. There is a reason her team is downplaying interaction between the two.

    • Kat says:

      I also can’t help but wonder if her photo ops with Ben are calculated attempts to solidify her image as the self-sacrificing, devoted mom who now makes family-friendly Christian films. Obviously it’s their decision, but if they’re putting themselves out there this much then it’s hard not to believe that there’s an ulterior motive. Either Jen’s determined to present herself to the world as the perfect example of a ‘family woman’, or she’s a massive push-over who’s giving her kids mixed messages.

      Side note, am I the only one who thinks it’s sh*tty that in 2016 we still find it socially and morally acceptable to eat baby animals simply because they’re flavour is decadent? I feel dirty just typing that.

      • Goodnight says:

        Honestly, I don’t understand why it’s less moral/ethical to farm younger animals to some people. Animals don’t have any concept of age/time. A one year old calf doesn’t know it’s any younger than a three year old cow. I don’t see how it’s more humane to wait for them to grow older before killing them. Baby animals feel the same amount of confusion and fear as adult animals.

        It’s a human concept, that young lives are more innocent and deserving of life than older ones. It might work for humans, who have morals and are capable of great cruelty, but a baby animal is no more innocent than a grown one. I honestly feel like the horror about the slaughter of younger animals is largely based on them being cuter, the very invented concept of innocent youth and ultimately the projection of those emotions onto the animals.

        I am totally fine with people eating meat and with people not eating meat, I just really don’t understand the ‘I’ll eat beef but I won’t eat veal’ mentality.

      • Illyra says:

        Well said Goodnight.

        I think it’s more the idea of “milk fed veal” which offends people. “Milk fed” (a euphemism) is where they apparently chain the calves in place and keep them purposely malnourished with an iron deficient formula, so they’ll grow larger but their muscles still won’t develop properly… it’s really horrific and cruel, and I would NEVER eat anything like that.

        Bob veal—where the calves are not chained up, and are usually slaughtered after only a few days—is much more humane, and while I don’t really like to think about it I also don’t have an issue with people eating it.

      • Kat says:

        You’re right, Goodnight.

        Time is indeed a human concept, but I think it says a lot about our sense of respect for other sentient beings when we don’t even pause to reflect on how the meal before us — whether it is lamb, veal, or even a pork product — was separated from its mother and put through tremendous suffering for our enjoyment (boy, was that ever a run-on sentence!)

  4. HeyThere! says:

    Ew. Don’t get back with him. She’s more forgiving than I am. After what he did, I would be communicating through an attorney for his safety! Lol

  5. Delta83 says:

    Ok so I call BS on the $5K bill. I looked up Hinterland Santa Monica and all I could find was a Hinterland opened by none other than Joe Jonas and the place looks like any chic bar/restaurant that hipsters would frequent. Menu prices everything under $30. I understand they ordered off the “Super Secret Menu” but I highly doubt this is the type of establishment that has $100 starters. I could understand $5K if we’re talking major chefs trained in the best culinary schools around the globe, but guys this is not The French Laundry, Napa Valley and even then I’m not sure it would reach that price. Some Of the most expensive restaurants include
    Masa, NYC
    Urasawa, Beverely Hills
    The French Laundry, Napa
    Per Se, NYC
    All these would be under $1300 even if you added on a couple bottles of extremely rare or $$$ wine maybe 3,500 but even then I highly doubt it. It says they ordered 2 bottles of wine apparently but I still can’t imagine a 5k bill. Show me the receipts.

    So in case someone else can find a different Hinterland in Santa Monica I think the source is full of it. It also doesn’t look like a place I would take my significant other if I wanted to pull out all the stops. But who knows? Haha!

    • Coconut says:

      FWiW, I paid ~$600 for two people at French Laundry 11 years ago, prob including wine. Great but not worth it.

  6. cannibell says:

    For some reason, Ben & Jen’s dinner date made me think of “Babette’s Feast,” a great movie in which Babette spent 10,000 kroner’s worth of lottery winnings and got way more for her money. (Also, she wasn’t trying to woo anyone back.)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvNifgj_dv4

    • Coconut says:

      Love Babette’s Feast!!

    • Azurea says:

      Oh, thanks! I’m having trouble finding good stuff to watch! Netflix is so limited in Canada. 😁

    • susanne says:

      Babette’s Feast is one of my favorite films. I’m in the mood for a food movie…I haven’t seen Jiro dreams of sushi. Some wonderful ones- The Lunchbox, The One Hundred Foot Journey, Big Night, of course. I just did a search and there are so many I want to see…Spinning Plates, El
      Bulli, A Matter of Taste,

      • cannibell says:

        Jiro is fabulous!!! And if you haven’t seen Tampopo, do – it’s a classic. Old, but fabulous. (And also Japanese.) Also, Azurea, I have close family in Canada, and it was crazy how much less Netflix had to offer there than here. (Also, that I couldn’t show my Canadian relatives the Trevor Noah segment about Ted Cruz’ 13 hours of raw film footage.)

  7. Size Does Matter says:

    Cheaper than divorce, I suppose.

  8. boredblond says:

    perhaps she’d prefer a big mac with someone who doesn’t drink, gamble, and sleep with the nanny…I would…

  9. JoJo says:

    I’ve been saying this all along. I believe Jen is playing the long game. To quote Lainey’s blind years ago, Jen told Ben, “I will never leave you.” I think she would ultimately prefer to be with him than not – regardless of anything he does. I don’t think she wanted to issue the divorce announcement in June either. I don’t know if I believe this dinner story though.Gossip Cop just put out a story a few days ago saying “the divorce is not off”, refuting the Celeb Dirty Laundry story suggesting they’re getting back together. But they haven’t gone to Gossip Cop to refute this dinner story yet, so I don’t know what that means.I think they are a mess. It’s the same old cycle. They have been going through this for years – way before Christine. Where will these two be in two years? And why did Jen push/sanction that huge feature on how she’s moving on with People Mag – just a week ago – if they’re getting back together?

    • Erinn says:

      I think she’s smarter than a lot give her credit for. I’d go as far to say that she had certain things in her mind that she’d put up with, and kind of rolled with. Ultimately, I think she does love Ben. Not just as her husband, but as the father of their kids, and as a friend. I think MAYBE it got to the point where she was like “too far” and I also think it’s possible this could be a case of ‘you’ve taken me for granted for too long, see how you deal without me’.

      Part of me wouldn’t be surprised if they got back together, while part of me really thinks she’s fine without him, but still welcomes him into her life because a) they’ve spent a good chunk of it together, and b) the kids.

  10. Erinn says:

    Ahahaha… I had to legit talk my husband into buying a $20 decorative globe from Winners the other day that HE wanted. Because apparently to a 26 year old plumber a marked down metallic globe makes him feel ‘wordly’. Which is actually kind of adorable if you knew how much of a hillbilly he was before we owned our house – he genuinely tries to be helpful when it comes to paint colors and decorating and such, but he’s always hella cheap. Keep in mind – despite my student loans, we’re not living in poverty haha – but it’s the same kind of discussion when it comes to him shopping for clothes. He’d rather look like a hobo than spend money. He’d probably throw up at the idea of 5k on supper.

  11. Luca76 says:

    I have a fantasy about flying to Denmark and eating at NOMA one day I mean I’ll probably never but that’s a 600$ meal. I think I’d feel awful spending that kind of money on one meal I can’t even wrap my mind around 5k.

  12. Naya says:

    Like I keep saying, there will be no divorce. This isn’t about Batman either. Those ticket sales do not depend on his marital success in any way, shape or form. This is their dynamic. Damaged people who shouldn’t be together and on some level dont want to be together but then simultaneously feed on the dysfunction. (She gets off saving him and being his martyr, while he gets off from testing her limits).

    They wont grow old together but there’ll be no divorce this time. They have at least two more years together

    • JoJo says:

      Yeah, I wouldn’t be surprised if you’re right. My guess is that without the nanny blow up, the divorce would have proceeded a lot faster. But that threw a huge wrench into the dynamic, taking an otherwise potentially amicable divorce to a massive public image disaster for Ben that he wasn’t expecting. This led to even more of the “long suffering” Garner stories and she has emerged on top in the public eye, as the martyr, the Saint. Even though she is a mediocre actress at best and had no real star power beyond being Ben’s wife for the last many years, this whole divorce drama has raised her up in the public eye and led to a renewed interest in her. Pretty typical scenario – and now my guess is that Ben sees this, it makes her more attractive to him and wants back in. And, I do think she’s smart and knows what she’s doing as she plays the long, patient waiting game, but I still think the real ball is and always has been in Ben’s court because at the end of the day, she doesn’t really want to leave him. One comment about that restaurant though – Hinterland. It doesn’t really look like the type of place two mega-stars in the midst of a very public divorce would go. From the pictures, it looks like a very small, casual eatery where they would be eating in plain site – not very private. And it doesn’t look dressy at all – just hipster casual. But maybe the photos don’t give a good picture of what it’s really like.

  13. kri says:

    Oh, god. Are we really doing THIS again???

  14. ThatMitsyGirl says:

    Is that another young, tan nanny?

  15. thaisajs says:

    I’m with the previous poster who called BS on this. There’s no way you could spend $5,000 on dinner at this place unless you picked up the check for everyone in the dining room. Entrees seem to run in the $25 range. The most expensive bottle on wine on the menu is a $120 Brunello. http://www.hinterland.la/menu/

  16. Ana says:

    The lives of the rich and famous. Wasnt the a sore back in the 80’s detailing the lives of these people. Yesterday, I saw an article about those magnificent board rooms on planes., etc. So this is possible.

    Back to Jen and Ben. Ben is going to start production soon for his next Batman movie and that will take more or less 5 months. He will be away from home. You guys can continue from there. 😝

    • lila fowler says:

      Is he going to spread his STDs all over Detroit again, I wonder?

      • JoJo says:

        Yeah, even if they attempt to reconcile, how could she possibly trust him while he’s away from home? That seems like an impossible task at this point. This from a woman who packed up and moved her entire family to Boston while he shot The Town so she could keep an eye on him in the presence of Blake Lively.

    • Ana says:

      I meant *show. Hard to type on phones.

      The new Batman production could be in Europe or other more exotic locations. Remember the story that Jen wanted to move the family in Detroit while he was filming, he said no.

      • JoJo says:

        He won’t say no this time though, I’m sure. If they get back together, I would think it would come with some major concessions on his part – at least for the next year or so. Probably will take a while before the novelty of getting back together wears off and the inevitable old dynamic resurfaces.

      • Diane says:

        They did announce that it was being filed in England.

    • Jwoolman says:

      Jojo- a friend’s husband was a serial cheater. She even had a revenge affair herself to get back at him. They were undergoing mandatory counseling prior to divorce. Both decided they had something worth salvaging so they both really worked at it. She said it took quite a while, but now they both actually trust each other again. So trust can be rebuilt, it just isn’t easy. Both people have to really want it and be willing to change as needed. It happens.

  17. Zaytabogota says:

    Why all the game playing? Such a waste of time. They should either get back together or move on with their lives. This is so weird, up to the point where they announced their separation he looked like he wanted anywhere but near her, he couldn’t wait to get away. Now he wants her back? It makes no sense, they must have a very co dependent relationship or she has something on him to keep him there.

  18. iheartgossip says:

    I don’t believe they ever broke up. I do believe the ‘Nanny-Gate’ was all a ruse to cover his detox, rehab and plastic surgery he’s undergone. Just more smoke ‘n mirrors in H’wood

  19. Joni says:

    This again? Tabloids are hell-bent on getting them back together. They’ll change the record once he’s pictured with some 20 year old model, i guess…

  20. Diane says:

    I still think there are addiction issues with Ben (which I really hope he can overcome). Having been through lots of counseling when I was dealing with those in my spouse, I think there is a lot of stuff going on in that area and that nothing final has happened because of that.

    I was told that if my spouse, who was making promises of change, could actually make changes and sustain those over an extended period of time (2 years is what I was given), there was a likelihood of true intent for change. But, because of the high level of deceit inherent in these addictions (particularly gambling), that behavior change over a shorter period of time was relatively easy for the addict to maintain to make you think it was real, when it wasn’t.

    This is speculation as to whether it applies in their lives, but then it’s all speculation.

    Hoping for the best for them, either individually or together.

  21. JoJo says:

    Woah! Vanity Fair. She admits nanny wasn’t the cause of their problems – they were separated for maths before that. I do believe that. She also says a lot about Ben. Very heartwarming – but it does sound to me like she could waver on taking him back. She calls him “the love of her life” – so, I don’t think she’s moved on emotionally yet. This story was clearly already planned before these “dinner” stories, so not sure if the dinner is really a new development or just a made-up tabloid tale.

    • Ana says:

      I thought it was very candid and she admitted the nanny hook up. But I think she is now on the stage of being independent and moving towards being a single person. I like the article.

      • JoJo says:

        I liked it too, and I agree she was very open and honest. But these stories are written in advance of when they appear, so just wondering if anything has changed since she was interviewed for this, which could have been weeks or even months ago. To me, it seems her woulda are still incredibly raw – and why wouldn’t they be – I know it could take years to get over something like this. But I still probably won’t believe they’re divorcing until I see the filing.

  22. Suzanne says:

    Oh, lawd…these two even manage to have boring scandals. 🙄

  23. Mmtahoe says:

    Look, I’m a huge foodie so much so that I took a leave from my job to get a culinary degree from Cordon Blue Paris. On a 3 week trip to Denmark and Sewden in September I made sure to get reservations way ahead of time at Noma, Amass, Gerarium, Nook, Restaurant Frantzén, and others. Massively expensive more than anywhere I’ve ever eaten, but all extraordinary, however no where near 5K unless we had ordered a 3k bottle of wine. Most of these dinners were chef menus of 7 or 9 courses. I just don’t believe any of that.

  24. OTHER RENEE says:

    So… is that another young nanny holding their son and whose arm their daughter is clutching? There is no world in which my kids would be clutching onto anyone’s arm but mine (except maybe my mother’s) whIle I yapped away with my husband. Just saying…

  25. cruiz2 says:

    What ever happened to their cute puppy? You never see it on outings. Who walks the dog? – or was that strictly PR BS?

  26. Magpie says:

    She’s still covering for him. I think she accepts him warts and all because it’s the only way to keep him. I dont believe they were seperated before the nanny and because it blew up they had to annonce a divorce to save face. They will wait for things to blow over.

  27. Jwoolman says:

    Maybe people are overanalyzing this. Separation sometimes does lead to reconciliation. Both parties have a chance to see what life is without the other, and at some point may start dating each other to see if there is something to salvage even with cheating episodes. They are both very likely still getting couples counseling and this may be a therapist’s recommendation, since obviously they still care about each other and they intend to both be there for their kids. Why not give him a chance to see if he can successfully deal with his addictions while they are separated? They’ve been apart quite a while now. That doesn’t mean she’s a doormat.