Comments on: Sienna Miller’s awareness raising trip to Congo includes luxury hotels

By: Robert

Robert — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:52:02 +0000

I don’t care at all of her! What a bitch!

By: A

Wed, 13 May 2009 15:45:50 +0000

img503.imageshack.us/img503/381/92686celebcityorgtheeld.jpg

just look at that “youth and beauty” as of yesterday.
such a puffy face, the liver is half dead already. courtesy of Stolichnaya.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Marianne

Marianne — Wed, 13 May 2009 08:25:32 +0000

Wow, guys, I think you’re all giving Sienna too much credit. She’s not worthy of a discussion. She’s not that relevant, you know? Unless you count wearing UGG boots and screwing married guys as a profession. I bet this trashy thing can’t even find Congo in a map. She probably finds Africa very “exotic”. Oh, so neocolonialism…I guess we all have to thank Jude Law for making us aware of the existence of Bimbo Sienna.
I mean, if this chick actually had a job (she calls herself an actress but this is bullshit. 10 minutes in Layer Cake and Alfie now is “acting”?) and was good at it, people could even think of forgiving her. But she’s vapid and talentless. If being a harlot wasn’t enough, she still dares to be stupid. Really, there’s no excuse for her. No reason to like her. Unless you’re her BFF, or her relative.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: fern

fern — Wed, 13 May 2009 06:19:09 +0000

Calling others cowards for “not showing their true colors” makes it even more obvious that you are just a SM fan who would DO ANYTHING to save SM image/career, even going so far as to pretend to be a witness(David Serota) to SM “good deeds”. Being a coward is high-jacking David Serota’s name because you think that you can trick people into believing that SM is the real deal for spending a WEEK in the Congo and “sacrificing” her comfort for the team and didn’t stay in a luxuary hotel. So she gave up a week of shopping, globe-trotting, partying, bar hopping, strolling through airports, and sleeping with a married man. What about those men and women who have given months and years?

If you were really concerned about educating people, you wouldn’t have used this as an opportunity to praise/glorify SM and bash those posters who in your opinion are not helping others because they are too busy “picking on SM for no apparant reason”. SM wanted everyone to know that she had “won” the married oil heir, so it’s not the public’s fault that all of the attention she drew to the affair backfired. If SM was doing good in this world and was moving forward, she wouldn’t have made a huge scene at LAX on Saturday just to keep everyone updated on the status of her affair with a married man. SM hasn’t moved forward for she is still playing the victim and blaming others for her misdeeds. You should change careers because it is useless trying to whitewash SM career/image by pretending to be a witness to her new and approved image.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: A

Wed, 13 May 2009 06:10:01 +0000

what you got is just assbackwards. I gave you real names of real people who really know her. if you are really “the cinematographer” then it won’t be a problem for you to talk to them.
don’t believe me or anyone else here, just pick up the phone and call them. as simple as that.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: David Serota

David Serota — Wed, 13 May 2009 04:52:28 +0000

No, I just support people doing good in the world, despite their past. Its about moving forward, not backward. But thank you for showing your true colors to everyone with your cowardice. Hiding behind your screen names. We get it. i will leave you to discuss how horrible we all are. Yes, perhaps I should change careers trying to educate people on issues outside of their everyday. Maybe I should blog nasty things? Hmm.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: fern

fern — Wed, 13 May 2009 04:08:37 +0000

“…if you are going to tear people down, have the guts to do it publicly”

Like SM “had/has the guts” to publicly tear down RG and her 4 kids (ie-popping up at LAX, allowing the married man to suck/grab her breast, publicly engaging in PDA with him over and over again, staging photo-op after photo-op with the married man even after she knew that it hurt RG)? SM wrote about how these women and children have limited resources, and here she is abusing the environment just so that she can publicly tear down a mother and her 4 kids.

If SM was concerned about the plight of women and children, she wouldn’t have popped up at LAX the day before Mother’s Day to imply that she is still sleeping with the married man who still hasn’t filed for a divorce/legal separation. If SM really cared about the plight of women and children in the Congo, there is NO WAY that she would still be crying wolf (tipping off the paps and acting distressed by their presence)and depicting herself as a victim (paps are distressing her so she needs a police escort).

SM has no one to blame but herself, so there is no use criticizing others for seeing through her PR stunts and not condoning her total disregard of 5 human beings.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: A

Wed, 13 May 2009 02:26:23 +0000

I guess it’s not a$$, it’s chocha

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Dorie

Dorie — Wed, 13 May 2009 02:24:18 +0000

David,

it’s pretty easy to give your name when you have your head completely up Sienna’s a$$.

There are others who will also give their name, like Rosetta Getty, Robin Wright Penn, who do not think she is such a stellar humanitarian because she climbed all over their husbands.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: A

Wed, 13 May 2009 02:09:01 +0000

David,
feel free to phone to Mr. Jude Law. He knows Miss Miller personally.
Or to Mr. Rhys Ifans, or to Mr. Matthew Rhys, or to Mr. Sean Penn.
All of them know Miss Miller pretty close. I’d say more than enough.
And then come back and give us your infinite wisdom.

Report this comment as spam or abuse