George Takei clarifies stance on Sulu: ‘This was never about me or what I wanted’

FedCon 25 Day 3
Last week, George Takei was asked by the Hollywood Reporter to comment on the fact that Sulu, the iconic character he played in the original Star Trek, was given a backstory in the upcoming Star Trek prequel, Star Trek: Beyond, which made Sulu gay. Takei was clear that while he was “delighted” that there would be a gay character in Star Trek, this was not the original vision of creator Gene Roddenberry, nor did it fit with Sulu’s backstory, and would have required him to have been closeted throughout his life. What’s more is that Takei claimed that he spoke with both director Justin Lin and with actor John Cho, who plays Sulu, and asked them to consider creating a new gay character instead of making Sulu gay. As you likely know, the filmmakers ignored him and went ahead and made Sulu gay anyway, considering it a tribute to openly gay Takei I guess despite his objections. Both screenwriter Simon Pegg and actor Zachary Quinto, who plays Spock and is an out gay man, defended the decision, with each claiming that it was an alternate timeline anyway, and Pegg wondering whether creating another character just to be be gay would be “tokenism.” It was a mess, and Quinto sounded offended that Takei wasn’t on board. Well now Takei is clarifying his comments, and he’s basically focusing on the positive and being a good sport about it. He posted the following to Facebook.

When the news first broke, I gave a lengthy telephone interview, but the headlines have been misleading. Apparently, controversy makes for better sales! Let me be clear: I am not disappointed that there is a gay character in Star Trek. On the contrary, as I made clear, I am delighted that the Star Trek franchise has addressed this issue, which is truly one of diversity. It is thrilling to know that future generations will not see LGBTs go wholly unrepresented in the Trek universe.

On the specific question of Sulu being gay, when I was first approached with the concept, I responded that I hoped instead that Gene Roddenberry’s original characters and their backgrounds would be respected. How exciting it would be instead if a new hero might be created, whose story could be fleshed out from scratch, rather than reinvented. To me, this would have been even more impactful. While I understand that we are in an alternate timeline with the new Trek movies, for me it seemed less than necessary to tinker with an existing character in order to fulfill Gene’s hope of a truly diverse Trek universe. And while I am flattered that the character of Sulu apparently was selected as an homage to me, this was never about me or what I wanted. It was about being true to Gene’s vision and storytelling.

Gene had wanted long ago to include LGBT characters, and we spoke personally and specifically about the lack of them. Gene understandably felt constrained by the sensitivities of the time. Some fifty years ago, even TV’s first interracial kiss, between Kirk and Uhura, caused our ratings to plummet as the show was censored across much of the South for that scene. Gene made a conscious decision to make the main characters heterosexual, and worked within those parameters to tell incredible stories that still challenged many cultural values of the time. So the lack of gay characters was not some oversight by him; it was a conscious decision with which he grappled. I loved Gene as a friend, and I respected his decision and the context under which he created these stories. On this 50th year anniversary of Star Trek, my hope was to honor his foresight and bravery, as well as his ability to create discussion and diversity despite these constraints.

But Star Trek has always pushed the boundaries and opened new opportunities for actors, including myself. I am eternally grateful to have been part of this incredible and continuing family. I wish John Cho well in the role I once played, and congratulate Simon Pegg on his daring and groundbreaking storytelling. While I would have gone with the development of a new character in this instance, I do fully understand and appreciate what they are doing—as ever, boldly going where no one has gone before. Star Trek will live long and prosper.

[From Facebook via People]

He didn’t have to do that, but Takei is a gracious guy and he wanted everyone to know there are no hard feelings. This is basically what he told The Hollywood Reporter but with less sensationalism. I get the impression that if Quinto and Pegg hadn’t been so vocal in their defense of gay Sulu, and had instead just conceded the point that they totally ignored Takei’s opinion and requests, he wouldn’t have had to issue another statement.

Human Rights Campaign Los Angeles Gala 2015

New York Film Critics Circle Awards

FedCon 25 Science Fiction Convention

Photos credit: WENN and Fame

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

19 Responses to “George Takei clarifies stance on Sulu: ‘This was never about me or what I wanted’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. mkyarwood says:

    I’m annoyed that Quinto was offended, but I’m an old fan, not a new one. It’s true that this is an alternate timeline situation but, to me, tossing in ‘and now Sulu is gay’ is tokenism. I’m coming around to the new movie…. but I still thing Pegg is THE WORST SCOTTY.

    • Cran says:

      Have always loved Sulu. Have enormous respect for Gene Roddenberry for his achievements with Star Trek. George Takei is indeed a gracious man. Alternate timeline be damned.

    • Bread and Circuses says:

      I like Pegg, and I like the new Trek, but I have to agree that he’s not Scotty; he’s Simon Pegg spliced onto the Enterprise.

      Meanwhile, Karl Urban IS Bones; it’s uncanny. He’s so perfect as that character. And Zachary Quinto is a solid, refreshed version of Spock. So it can be done, but Pegg isn’t managing to do it.

  2. Alex says:

    Yea I got what George was saying and many fans on other boards pointed out that originally they wanted to be more inclusive but again the era was not on their side. By ignoring him they blew it way out of proportion and frankly were asses about the situation. George was thoughtful in his opinion and his suggestion would’ve honored the original idea AND inclusiveness

    • Pinky says:

      Yeah. I’m still on Takei’s side on this one. His point remains a very valid one.

      –TheRealPinky

    • Jellybean says:

      Not being convinced by a person’s argument is not the same as ignoring them.He is entitled to his opinion and he makes a good point, but I think on balance he was wrong. Star Trek is all about the original lead characters. If they did introduce a new character nobody would really care about them. His sexuality has hardly been a major topic and now it seems the fact that he is married to a man will seen on screen, but with no comment, because it has no baring on him as a hero. It would be crass to show him coming out and it would be tokenism to say this is red shirt number 2 and before he dies you should know he is gay.

  3. Tarheel Pixie says:

    I love this man. He is a treasure.

  4. Izzy says:

    The thing is, Takei is totally correct. I understand they’ve created an alternate timeline, but now they’re throwing out all the canon of Star Trek and basically ignoring the legacy of its creators, which is a mistake when you’re dealing with a franachise that is FIFTY years old, IMO.

    • LinaLamont says:

      Agree.

      Takei is a class act here.

    • Wurstbonbon says:

      +1
      Team Takei all the way.
      Also I’m going to definitely boycott this movie. Nothing good has happened to the beloved star trek universe in the last years. I really hate the movies as much as I love the first 4 tv series. Somewhere around the time of Scott Bakulas enterprise things got really shitty.. </3
      I'm putting all my hope in the new tv series that is supposed to air next year. Fingers crossed!

  5. Helen says:

    I’m just pleased to see Pegg backlash finally. He seems so universally adored, but trust, he is a diva with an ego. My husband worked with him.

    I feel like I’m taking crazy pills though because in interviews he seems obviously to be a bit of a twat and yet people keep cooing over how nice he is 😕

  6. Looty says:

    Takei is an INCREDIBLY gracious guy, and he was absolutely right from the beginning.

  7. Persephone says:

    I wonder if making Sulu gay had anything to do with the backlash for making Khan white instead of taking the opportunity to have an Indian actor take on the role.

  8. outhousecat says:

    I loved the original Star Trek and have pretty much avoided all the television sequels. However I did catch a few of the movies and I must say I’m tired of the re-working of the original characters. I wish they’d have moved on gradually with new characters and let the old ones die off. Watching dancing Vulcans or whatever they come up with next is not on my agenda.

  9. HeidiM says:

    And perhaps he felt slighted for them to take the onky character played by an openly gay man, and say his character is gay too. As if he wasnt believable as a straight character.