Taylor Swift considers pursuing criminal & civil action against Kanye West

FFN_INI_Swift_Taylor_050216_52042118

As everybody knows by now, Kim Kardashian dropped the receipts on Snapchat on Sunday night. Kim initially spilled the tea that Kanye West had recorded the conversation between himself and Taylor, wherein he asked for her permission-slash-gave her the heads up that he was going to put her name in one of his songs. Kim told that story to GQ, and she also told GQ that following Taylor’s I’m-the-victim Grammy speech, Swift and West had not spoken, but Kanye had heard from Taylor’s lawyer. Kim told GQ that Swift sent “maybe an attorney’s letter… saying, ‘Don’t ever let that footage come out of me saying that. Destroy it.’” Kim pointed out that the recording was part of the documentary footage Kanye was shooting around the making of his album, The Life of Pablo.

Kim also noted in that GQ interview, “When you shoot something, you don’t stop every two seconds and be like, ‘Oh wait, we’re shooting this for my documentary.’ You just film everything, and whatever makes the edit, then you see, then you send out releases. It’s like what we do for our show.” Which is true. That’s how a lot of these documentary-style things work. Do you think Beyonce is constantly getting releases from everyone around her as she’s being followed around by a videographer 24-7? No. She’s not. She gets releases from people as she uses certain footage in videos, concerts and more.

Still, the whole issue of “did Kanye inform Taylor that he was recording her and did Taylor give her permission – written or verbal – to be recorded and have that recording distributed on Snapchat?” is the question of the day. TMZ reports that Taylor and her lawyers threatened Kanye with “criminal prosecution” months ago for making the recording. It was likely recorded in Kanye’s studio in LA, and it’s against California law to record someone without their consent. It’s a felony, punishable by a fine and up to a year in jail. TMZ got their hands on the letter Taylor’s lawyers sent to Kanye, and wouldn’t you know? Kim was telling the truth about that too. The letter demanded that Kanye “immediately destroy all such recordings.” TMZ also reports that Taylor is weighing her next step carefully.

Taylor Swift is thinking about filing a crime report against Kanye West for illegally recording their phone conversation, and against Kim Kardashian for publicly releasing the audio … TMZ has learned. Sources familiar with the situation tell us Taylor is undecided and is trying to think through the consequences of filing a police report.

TMZ broke the story … when Taylor’s team found out about the recording, her lawyer fired off a letter to Kanye’s attorney, threatening legal action and notifying him the recording was a criminal violation … punishable as a felony.

We’re told Kanye made the recording in the L.A. area — and in California, a party to a phone conversation cannot record it unless all parties agree. Taylor had no idea she was being recorded.

[From TMZ]

Here’s my question… if Taylor had no idea she was being recorded, how did she and her lawyers know that there was a recording (an illegal recording) which needed to be destroyed? When was the letter sent, and when did Taylor find out that she had been recorded? Is there another Snapchat receipt just waiting to be released in which Kanye tells Taylor, “Oh, I should tell you that you’re being recorded as part of my making-of-Pablo documentary”? Kanye’s team told People Magazine that did happen, sort of. A source told People that “the rapper always records his entire album-creation process for his archives, and that Swift was made aware she was on tape. The source adds that Swift is on video approving all the verse lyrics, including ‘I made that bitch famous,’ which wasn’t mentioned in the clips released Sunday.” YES. That means that there are more Snapchat receipts to come!!!!!

While Taylor Swift has every right to pursue criminal and civil charges – and she might even have good cases for both civil and criminal litigation – I also think that the damage has already been done. Suing Kanye now would be like closing the barn door after the horse has bolted, PR-wise. These stories about Taylor possibly/maybe thinking about pressing charges or filing a lawsuit were a decent attempt by her PR team to deflect away from the primary conversation, which was that Taylor and her people misrepresented the conversation with Kanye and they lied about the substance of the conversation just so Miss Bad Blood could play the victim at Big Bad Kanye’s expense once again. What’s striking (to me) is that I’m really getting the feeling that there are additional recordings yet to come, and Kanye and Kim are waiting to see how Taylor plays it. If Taylor does sue, perhaps there will be another Snapchat where we get to hear Kanye tell Taylor that she’s being recorded and she gives her verbal permission.

Update: In a new story on TMZ, sources claim that Taylor could not press charges against Kanye for recording their conversation because it’s not against the law to record a conversation that “may be overheard.” As in, Kanye had Taylor on speaker in a room full of people, including Rick Rubin, and Taylor knew she was being overheard, and she was even talking to other people in the room.

FFN_THUMBS42FF_West_Kanye_071616_52124160

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

242 Responses to “Taylor Swift considers pursuing criminal & civil action against Kanye West”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Maria says:

    “Suing Kanye now would be like closing the barn door after the horse has bolted, PR-wise.”
    not only that it would be a PR disaster, too. people would see it as someone powerful trying to bury the truth. her reputation would never recover. if its illegal or not does not matter in terms of public perception.
    if Taylor wants to keep her career she cant sue.

    • Aussie girl says:

      I think Taylor wants to and if she could do it with out the public knowing she would. But Taylor knows this will not do herself any favours. She must be livid, it was all #taymerica and then this. Not sure if she was aware of been taped and it’s so hard to know with all these people but I would probably feel a little violated if someone recorded me with out my consent or my knowledge.
      #teamneither

      • Emma - The JP Lover says:

        @Aussie Girl, who wrote: “Not sure if she was aware of been taped and it’s so hard to know with all these people but I would probably feel a little violated if someone recorded me with out my consent or my knowledge.”

        But if Taylor knew she was on speaker phone and knew other people were in the room at the time because she spoke to them as well, does that mean it wasn’t a private conversation? Whatever they said to each other was heard by other people anyway. I’m not a big fan of Mr. and Mrs. West, but it seems as if Kim may have checked into the legal consequences prior to leaking the receipt.

        P.S. And is it me … or is Taylor Swift now sporting the exact platinum blond hair color Christina Aguilera wore for nearly a decade?

      • AG-UK says:

        @Emma – The JP Lover
        I think you are correct she was heard by all, as the interview I read a tiny part of Kim said Kanye records everything from his sessions and doesn’t stop when he calls someone the recording was still on and if on speaker phone she could hear. I also think they may be idiots but as litigious as people can be I bet they contacted some lawyer before releasing it

      • Bonzo says:

        Of course Kim checked with her legal team before releasing the video on Sunday. This is the daughter of the lawyer that got OJ off. She made sure her ass was covered before she posted that video.

        I’ve wondered if the the lack of Kanye reciting “I made that b!tch famous” line means she’s holding back that clip. That seems to be the lynch-pin of Taylor’s defense so it wouldn’t surprise me if she plans to post that part of the video next.

        At any rate, I think there’s more damning evidence against Taylor and KK is smart enough not to release it all at once. #TeamNoOne

      • Llamas says:

        But didn’t she engage in slander and libel? She lied to damage his reputation. I’m fairly sure that’s illegal in it of itself.

      • Lucinda says:

        It seems like KIm and Kanye keep giving Taylor just enough rope to hang herself and Taylor obliges every single time because she is so bent on playing the victim.

      • Otaku Fairy says:

        @Llamas: Agreed.

      • JustVisiting says:

        Bongo
        Robert k was not “the lawyer that got oj off” he was a lawyer on a large team that ultimately had only minor impact there. Cochran was the lawyer who got oj off if you want to single anyone out.

        And Kim was still very young when he passed. It’s more likely he wasn’t instilling legal awareness on her vs parenting. By all accounts it was all parental. Checking with lawyers is just smart. Given her show, the years of being in the public eye I’m sure she and her teams are well aware to send everything through legal before it happens.

        That seems far more likely.

    • Eleonor says:

      This.
      Taylor should have just STFU in the first place. But she hasn’t. Now she should apologize and go away for a while, imo.

      • Pinky says:

        Agreed. She doesn’t want to become LeAnn Rimes 2.0.

        And it’s not illegal to record the call, as the update says. Plus, Taylor was likely in a one-party state when the call was made, which in court has prevailed over the two-party rule. She needs to vanish for a while and come back with a new album called “Mea Culpa,” where she apologizes to all the people’s she’s trashed in pursuit of her own fame. She is so self-indulgent, self-involved, self-absorbed, selfish, and shallow.

        –TheRealPinky

      • Jill says:

        @Pinky:

        Wrong. The two-party state prevailed in Kearney vs Salomon Smith Barney and most judges err on the side of the state with the stronger laws – which is the two-party consent state.

        But that is moot because it looks like Taylor knew there were other people in the room and had no reasonable expectation of privacy therefore she can’t – and won’t – sue.

      • TreadStyle says:

        @TheRealPinky agree with all you said!

    • paolanqar says:

      This will end up badly. Taylor seems like the typical spoilt brat that starts throwing fits whenever someone doesn’t agree with her. She is coming out for what she really is and if she wants to come out of this story nicely she should just stop commenting, posting, threatening or trying to convince the public that she is in the right.
      Let it go Tay. Nobody cares anyway.

      • yuck says:

        Oh and she should never pick up the phone when Kanye’s calling again.

      • Liv says:

        I’m surprised that people are actually on the Kardashian’s/West’s side. Taylor made a big mistake by talking to Kanye and she also might be a mean girl, but what Kanye did was a really poor move. The things you say about Taylor, that she’s a spoilt brat etc. also apply to Kanye. Nobody wins in my opinion.

        Oh and I totally think that Taylor’s career won’t be damaged. Not sure about Kanye though. Beyonce and others are probably wondering right now if they got caught on tape too. Who wants to work with him if he records people and uses the material in public to work in his favor?

      • Megan says:

        Taylor has been beaten. A smart girl would keep her mouth shut, put a ring with diamonds on her hitching finger, arrange a dozen pap walks and overtly “hide” her left hand. Narrative changed just like that.

      • MP says:

        @Liv
        Her mistake was not answering his call but to repeatedly lie about it. She threw him under the bus very publicly knowing that her innocent girl next door image would make people believe her over Kanye who is often less than coherent.
        She watched Kanye get publicly beaten after her Grammy speech and probably felt like it was a huge success for her. She is beyond cold and nasty.

      • Scal says:

        She just needs to learn that she can’t control what every one does and what everyone thinks about her. The girl is SOOO thin skinned and such a control freak about her ‘image’ that she can’t take one negative word it’s insane.

        It was dumb to try and pretend that the conversation didn’t happen, and then move the goalposts and try to make it about line x or y. But hey, playing the victim is 50% of her success so why wouldn’t it work this time?

      • Zooey says:

        She didn’t have the benefit of a recording of the conversation on her end, so she may not have recalled word-for-word what she said to Kanye, just the general gist.

        Kim and Taylor both drink their own KoolAid too much – I find both nauseating at this point!

      • Sarah says:

        Scal, Taylor is the Donald Trump of the music world.

      • Katie says:

        “…Kanye who is often less than coherent…” Hahahah. 😂😂
        My, that’s certainly an understatement! Ctfu. 😂

    • LB says:

      She has a history of suing or sending legal notices to people but it’s never been anyone this big. It’s also never been when public perception has been this highly against her already. At worst for Kimye, they get slapped with a fine, while Taylor achieves nothing.

      She’d be dumb to sue. But then again, it was dumb to backtrack and pretend a conversation of this nature never happened (I’m going by the first statement her people released and not the clarification later about the bitch part). He may have not told her about the bitch part but the context of the conversation makes clear she knew he was “claiming credit” for making her famous, and makes her Grammy speech ridiculously OTT and somewhat defamatory given how congenial their conversation was.

      • Betti says:

        Yes she has previous for suing for less than this and at the .ittle people who don’t have fame and money. She strikes me as someone who isn’t listening to her team, she thinks that as Daddy owns 60% of her record company she can’t do as she p,eases and everyone has to work their asses off to mop up after her.

        As I said down thread, Kim isn’t finished with her. I think she’s had it with Swift continually trashing Kanye.

      • Tara says:

        Agreed, LB.

    • CG says:

      Exactly! She *has* to have a team telling her she can’t sue, right? There is no way that suing will make her look good, at all, not at this point.

    • HH says:

      Yes. I saw comments yesterday about the potential legal ramifications about having her privacy violated. As if that’s the messed up part. As if her lies didn’t get her here in the first place. Now, this will just look like sour grapes on her part. Kanye and Kim proved not only a lie, but just how manipulative she can be. All three of these people annoy me a lot at different, however, there’s something particularly awful about what Taylor did here. Not only did Taylor go back on her word, but she did it SO publicly at the Grammy’s. Yes, the VMA incident was bad, but it was at least spontaneous, not personal, it was clear he was fighting personal demons from the death oh his mother; AND he apologized. Taylor was never going to admit her wrongdoing. In fact, she was looking to take advantage of the “Kanye West is awful/crazy and won’t stop tormenting me” narrative. Let’s also be clear and say Taylor had the right to change her mind, but Kanye had a right to know. Instead, she publicly humiliated him to specifically further her image.

      Also, this whole incident pokes even more holes in Taylor’s brand of feminism. Let’s throw her a bone and say the additional footage isn’t out there. So you men to tell me a guy saying he’d bang you is alright, but b*tch is where you draw the feminist line?

      • dodgy says:

        @HH

        ” however, there’s something particularly awful about what Taylor did here. Not only did Taylor go back on her word, but she did it SO publicly at the Grammy’s. Yes, the VMA incident was bad, but it was at least spontaneous, not personal, it was clear he was fighting personal demons from the death oh his mother; AND he apologized. Taylor was never going to admit her wrongdoing. In fact, she was looking to take advantage of the “Kanye West is awful/crazy and won’t stop tormenting me” narrative. ”

        Hear! Hear!

        I’d also speak about the racial optics she’s manipulating re: your last sentence, but I won’t.

      • Babalon says:

        This post is spot on.

      • jeanpierre says:

        Great post HH! ITA

      • Shambles says:

        “I’d also speak about the racial optics she’s manipulating re: your last sentence, but I won’t.”

        I was waiting for someone to finally say this, or at least allude to it as you have. How long are we going to sit here and pretend Taylor isn’t trying to benefit from/ invoke the “lily white princess is wronged by a big bad black man” visual? I know that might not be what she’s blatantly or consciously trying to do, but it still reeks.

      • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

        You said it all, and yeah that last paragraph.

        I think what disgusts me the most is the fact I’m now more aware of Taylor KNOWING how her brand of whiteness is a shield against criticism and how she now uses that shield as a weapon. She KNEW Kanye would look crazy and obsessed, dirty and like the trope of the black man obsessed with the pure white woman, and she plays along.

        Whether he’s nuts or not she played along and led him to believe they were all in on the same game plan and then had her moment of triumph knowing all her feminist schtick was a lie beneath the surface.

      • Alex says:

        Exactly a LOT of people missed the racial component to this. The big scary black dude will never get the benefit of doubt over the lily white princess

      • Bonzo says:

        The think pieces on the larger narrative of Taylor using the “big black man bullies sweet white girl” to further her victim image are becoming part of the conversation. I posted one yesterday:

        http://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/a61501/taylor-swift-kim-kardashian-exposed/

        “Whether Taylor knows it or not (and I suspect she knows it), if Kim hadn’t released those Snapchats, there’s a large portion of America that simply would have continued to take her word over Kanye’s and believed that he was harassing her in the media out of spite. We’re a country structurally set up to protect whiteness over blackness, and at least one reason 2016 has been the dumpster fire that it has been is because of the way America sees black men — and black people — in general.”

      • HH says:

        @ESE – RE: “I think what disgusts me the most is the fact I’m now more aware of Taylor KNOWING how her brand of whiteness is a shield against criticism and how she now uses that shield as a weapon. She KNEW Kanye would look crazy and obsessed, dirty and like the trope of the black man obsessed with the pure white woman, and she plays along.” YASSSSS!

        THIS. And LET’S BE CLEAR about the RACIAL OPTICS and HISTORICAL PARALLELS: Taylor Swift (white woman) was perfectly fine letting Kanye (Black Man) “defile” her (i.e “I feel like me and Taylor might still have sex”) because she had a “parachute” (i.e. her brand of whiteness). Much like back in the day when white women were complicit in flirting/sleeping with Black Men, and only once their public reputation/innocence was in question, did they act like it was without consent.

      • MI6 says:

        Well done, HH.
        As for the racist “undertones” in this narrative – how about TS’s video director Joseph Kahn defending her in a tweet that said “Ain’t the first time the Kardashians supported the murder of an innocent BLONDE woman.”
        Holy SHIT. That’s about as blatantly racist as it gets.

      • Jill says:

        Taylor will still come out ahead. Facts don’t matter to a lot of people nowadays. People will fit the narrative to believe their own facts. My Facebook and twitter feed is full of people supporting Taylor and calling Kanye and Kim every sort of trashy, disgusting name in the book.

        The white, soccer mom, minivan majority is firmly on Taylor’s side and I guarantee the media will take Taylor’s side on this too. The racial politics are already blowing up and you can sense the undercurrent of the tweets in those defending Taylor.

        American is in the throes of “scary black man” convos right now due to the recent shootings and last night’s Republican convention which blamed everything wrong in America on black people and immigrants.

      • Llamas says:

        I saw some comments on this having some racial basis but I really don’t think it does. Her schtick is to be wronged by everyone who so much as glances her way in a fashion she doesn’t like. It doesn’t matter what race, age, gender etc., she will be wronged no matter what.

        My friend sent me a list of her legal actions which are including but not limited to:

        -suing fans on etsy for making art
        -suing her guitar teacher for saying he taught her
        -getting some guy who she says groped her fired and then suing when he and witnesses said that wasn’t the case
        -a cease and desist letter to people that recited “Shake It Off” on their podcast
        -the trademark fiasco
        -having tumblr posts talking about how Adele broke her youtube record deleted

        I’m sure there’s an absurd amount of stuff that was forgotten. As someone who is studying to be a psychiatrist and someone that has spent years upon years researching mental illness I truly think she has a Personality Disorder. I think she falls on the Narcissistic side. I’m not a doctor but I’m not stupid when it comes to mental illness. She’s def got a problem.

      • HH says:

        @Llamas – RE:”I saw some comments on this having some racial basis but I really don’t think it does.” and the examples mentioned >>> Yes, Taylor absolutely will play the victim to and sue when needed. Yes, she is manipulative and controlling in every way possible. That being said, in THIS particular instance Taylor based her strategy–maybe not entirely, but at least in part–in an already established narrative of “purity and whiteness” and “danger and blackness”. No, Kanye didn’t do himself any favors with previous actions and his overall public persona, but that doesn’t negate the racial optics of this. Taylor used all of this to her advantage. ***Race is not her reason for suing/not working with/being upset with Kanye; and, no one is arguing that point. What is being argued, is that racial undertones are being used as part of a defense.*** All of this can still be used by someone with NPD; someone doesn’t have to be racist and/or agree with racism to use it as a tool for personal gain (see: Donald Trump).

      • JRenee says:

        I am no Kim or Kanye fan or apologist, but damn, come on now. Stevie Wonder can see the racial undertones here. She got outplayed and exposed as a liar and drama queen

    • Shaz says:

      Taylor wants to act self-righteous and injured, but she got caught lying. That’s why she’s pissed.

  2. paolanqar says:

    They should just ALL grow up. This might be the end of either Kim or Taylor. Too bad it isn’t going to be the end for both of them.

    • DavidBowie says:

      +1

    • Naya says:

      Kim has never been held up as a paragon of virtue. The girl who marketed her sex tape, makes a living off of posting nude selfies, denies blatant cosmetic enhancement, married a guy to score a tv special, taped herself refusing to let her new husband move into her house and has been publicly derided by multiple much loved celebrities for being vapid and talentless; that girl is a cockroach. It would take much more than a court deeming her acts illegal to destroy her.

      Ms Butter “don’t melt in my mouth” on the other hand would be finished. Firstly by the optics of a mega celeb suppressing the truth, secondly by the following over exposure and finally, by the deliciousness that would emerge from the depositions. And as all that is happening her kiddie fanbase will be busy outgrowing her.

    • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

      Oh I can promise you right now it isn’t the end of Kim. Public perception has Kim crowned as a Queen for being the one to finally ‘prove’ what a decade plus of other celebrities insinuated about Taylor.

      Taylor’s the one bleeding red PR wise with literally every celebrity to ever tangle with her chipping in to contribute to their own ‘She’s over’ party. Looks like she had more bad blood than she thought.

      • Bonzo says:

        Yeah, it’s Taylor whose innocent victim image has taken a huge hit with the exposure of her lies and manipulation of the public’s opinion of her & Kanye.

    • MiniMii says:

      Agreed! I can see this as the beginning of the end for Taylor, but not Kim. As others have said, Kim’s image has never been the perfect little princess, so she’ll walk away from this laughing. Taylor on the other hand, plays the lily-white princess & professional victim, and now that the truth is out, she’s got a lot of work to do to try & repair the damage she’s done.

      The best thing she could do is suck it up, admit she was wrong, and then keep quiet for a while. Of course that won’t happen, and the high school drama will continue.

  3. Tanguerita says:

    there is an article that went up on the daily mail page an hour or so ago, can’t find it right now. Anyway – apparently she can’t sue because she knew she was on speaker and that there were other people in the room and thus their conversation couldn’t be considered private.
    Edit: there it is http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3697173/Kim-Kardashian-WON-T-prosecuted-Taylor-Swift-recording-star-knew-phone-call-Kanye-overheard.html
    say what you want about Kardashians, but they have a good legal team.

    • NewWester says:

      I heard that same thing.

    • mila says:

      say what you want about Kardashians, but they have a good legal team.

      true. ask OJ.

      this is all so gross. i do not hate people in general, but i do hate what this family represents.

      also, can they all just stop for a while, i am still a mess since Diane and Josh broke up. I have no relationship goals anymore…

      • Tanguerita says:

        true dat, on both accounts. it’s such a shame. But Diane has been travelling all over Europe with Reedus – they went to a fourth of July party in Tuscany together and were seen in Amsterdam and Paris. There were a couple of pictures of them together at this party, but they got pulled down really quickly. Still, D&N probably realised that they can’t keep their relationship a secret forever, hence the announcement.

    • Miss Jupitero says:

      My gut feeling was that KK and Kanye are way too aware of their own interests to post the receipts without heavily vetting the matter with an attorney first. Say what you like about them, they are not morons. They absolutely have more recordings to post. As for Tay Tay, if she or her reps directly state that they will sue, that will speak volumes. So far everything seems to be coming from “unnamed sources.” I would think if she had a solid case, her lawyer would have filed charges by now, or at least made a statement.

    • Lucy says:

      I read that Taylor was in NY for the phone call and NY does allow recording without the other party being aware of it.

    • ElleBee says:

      I used to watch KUWTK at one point (go on and judge me) and there was an episode where Kim says that she isn’t stupid, her dad was a lawyer (paraphrasing). There’s a reason so many companies have sued the K Klan and weren’t successful and why they’ve maintained that trashy show for nearly a decade.Those women especially Kris and Kim know exactly what they’re doing. Their legal team is unparalleled too. Remember how Kris Humphries (he was a douche on the show btw) couldn’t utter a word about them and how the prenup and non disclosure agreement were bullet proof? This TSwift thing is an unstoppable PR force meeting a ruthless immovable pr object. I’m living for it.

  4. Snowpea says:

    Am I the only conspiracy theorist here who thinks this whole thing is a beat up to garner maximum publicity?

    All famehoes the lot of ’em. Wouldn’t put it past them.

    • amanda says:

      No, you are not alone in this. I feel like we’re all being snowed.

    • Londerland says:

      I don’t think Taylor’s in on it. She is so obsessive about controlling her image, a very specific good-girl-victim image, there is just no way she comes out of this looking good. Maybe the real true blue loony fans still think she’s been misled and set up by nasty old Kimye, but to anyone else with a brain, she looks petty, manipulative, and dishonest. She was happy to be their victim but no way she would sign off on playing THIS role.

    • Pepper says:

      I don’t think so. I could see them agreeing to start a feud where both could play the victim in their different ways and that’s basically what’s been happening up til now. Taylor’s been doing her ‘why are people so mean to me’ thing, and Kanye’s been doing his ‘why is my genius so misunderstood’ thing. But this latest reveal does nothing for Taylor, it’s just a question of how damaging it is.

      She doesn’t just look conniving, she looks unbelievably stupid for lying about something she had to know could be disproved. It’s hurts her ‘poor me’ image, an image she’s very carefully cultivated over the years, and it also hurts her ‘brilliant businesswoman’ image. If she was that good, that powerful, she’d have been able to shut this down. It hits her pretty much everywhere. There’s no upside for her other than the fact people are talking about her, but she doesn’t need to drag herself to get press, she was already getting a ton. It just doesn’t make sense that she’d be in on this.

    • DIRTNAP says:

      I think all of this is fake-a-roo. The timing of how everything is unfolding just seems too planned. Or maybe I’m wrong and ALL of these people really are this immature.

    • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

      So how would this help Taylor?

      I’m serious. She has long time fans on Twitter going on rants about how she betrayed them and they’re done with her. She has other celebrities liking posts about how she’s fake. She has multiple websites parsing every word she’s made about this whole thing and literally posting statements and videos right her right next to the evidence Kim posted.

      I just don’t see how people always say, “They’re in on it” when stuff like this is media suicide. This is the stuff that makes PR agents have nightmares.

    • Adrien says:

      Initially, yes. But Taylor’s reputation as princessy victim was at stake. Unless she wants to self sabotage that image and create another one similar to Rih. A man-eating, baller b*tch. Her schtick is getting stale and you can only write a heartbreak diss song for so long. But I won’t be surprised if this is another publicity stunt.

    • Bonzo says:

      I’d be inclined to side with that view were it not the enormous amount of damage that this has done to her reputation. Her brand of playing the victim that rises above the strife has been dismantled with this revelation of how deceptive and manipulative she is. She has absolutely nothing to gain from PR nightmare she’s brought on herself.

      Journos and other celebrities have been hesitant to speak out against her because of the backlash they’d get from criticizing “America’s Sweetheart”. I think we’re starting to see just how unliked she has been among her peers and some of the press now that her true nature is being revealed.

      Google Ronnie Cremer to see what she’s willing to do to “protect” her image.

    • ohdear says:

      If it is, I hope it is because she wants to change her narrative to a more mature, introspective and thoughtful artist. It would be a great opportunity to go away for awhile, come back with a folk-ish album with songs about the magical sights, sounds and smells of the Australian back country, romantic nights by the light of the moon and so on.

    • sauvage says:

      You’re definitely not alone in this. All of them strive from drama. All of them are attention addicts. This is garnering a lot of publicity, and people are actually invested in it, digging deeper, figuring out timelines… And then it’s all part of a Kanye West semi-documentary, a contemporary comment on the ruthlessness pursuit of celebrities and the will to believe just about any romour being sent out about them.

  5. Leo says:

    I wonder if people will now say Taylor needs to let it go, move on, be an adult, just like they said to all the people Taylor was being an arse to over the years.

  6. Nev says:

    Have a seat Taylor. Many.

  7. jeanpierre says:

    I’m so happy this witch is getting payback after what she did to Kanye. That’s right, just sue him now, keep digging that career grave.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      Please. She can do anything she wants to to Kanye after he jumped up,on the stage like a nine year old when she was getting an award and claimed that made her famous. He’s every bit as gross as she is, if not worse. I wish I thought this would affect his career, but of course it won’t. The world is full of people who don’t care that he’s a misogynist married to an empty shell.

      • jeanpierre says:

        No she can’t. Being wronged doesn’t give one every right. He humiliated her at the VMAs but not a single lie was told that night, he was punished for it and this was ages ago. She humiliated him at the grammys this year, using big fat lies and bad-black-man-harassing-her narrative. This is just vile.

      • Locke Lamora says:

        I don’t understand why that whole award show thing is such a big deal. Yeah, it was her moment bla bla bla, but people act like it was so traumatising? It was a bit embarrasing, sure, but people act like he assaulted her on stage or something.

        The “I made that bitch famous” and using a naked doll of her are much more problematic, IMO. But if she approved the lyrics, that adds a whole new layer to the entire thing.

      • honeybee blues says:

        I have to disagree, GNAT. I much prefer an self-asorbed idiot who lets the world know exactly who he is, warts and all, than a boldfaced liar who manipulates her image to the point of it being unrecognizable next to reality, and does so at the expense of her primarily female colleagues. At least he’s a genuine misogynist. And once again, that mean girl has me defending someone I find borderline loathsome. Which is yet another reason I find her substantially worse than either KK or KW. And now my fingers just went up in flames typing that.

      • OhDear says:

        I strongly disagree. He apologized for it and, as she states in the phone call, sent her flowers. It was also about *seven* years ago, and they both have acted as if it’s water under the bridge.

        Meanwhile, Kanye called her about the lyrics for her approval, which she explicitly said was very kind of him and that he didn’t have to do that. Then she very publicly threw him under the bus for no reason at all.

      • burnsie says:

        I agree, Locke Lamora. I watched the whole show that year live, and it really wasn’t a big deal. It was definitely rude but it wasn’t the full blown attack people make it out to be. Plus, Taylor got her chance at the end of that show when Beyoncé gave her speech time. I remember at the time thinking that Taylor was kind of rude to Beyoncé and not being appreciative to her for sacrificing her speech time. Not to mention in the years since Taylor’s won so many more awards – hindsight, but it’s still odd that people characterize that moment as something so much more than it was.

        I’m not a fan of the Kardashian/Wests or Swifty, and I think Swifty is definitely in the wrong on this one — just wanted to throw in my 2 cents as someone who watched the 2009 VMAs live

      • Bonzo says:

        What OhDear says. Also, that VMAs interruption did nothing but positive things for Taylor’s PR. She came out of that smelling like a rose.

        What she did to Kanye at the Grammy’s was despicable after what she said to him when he called her to get her consent for the lyrics. She said one thing and did the opposite.

        I’m not on either team, but it’s pretty clear that Taylor overplayed her hand and got beat at her own game. She deserves all the bad press she’s getting.

      • HH says:

        @GNAT – I disagree that the VMA incident was as proportionally bad as this (or even what Taylor did at the Grammy’s). Like I said above, Kanye interrupting Swift was bad, but it was: spontaneous, not personal, clear he was going through personal issues with the death of his mom, AND HE WENT ON AN APOLOGY TOUR. Swift set out to personally make him look bad at the Grammy’s. She had a pre-planned narrative (that plays on racial optics, but that’s explained above). And we all know, Taylor had no intentions of ever apologizing. Furthermore, that VMA incident didn’t make Taylor famous, but it has made her “infamous.” That can’t even be argued. It’s a moment that has equally defined both of their careers.

      • Dlo says:

        Thank you gnat

      • cherrypie says:

        @ GNAT, did you see Taylor’s Grammy speech? That speech was made after she had that telephone conversation with Kanye. It was so low even lower than that d8ckhead move he made at the VMA’s

  8. Loopy says:

    Taylor should just lay low in Aussie and let it go,this is probably getting Kanye off.

  9. Dangles says:

    Oh wow. Taylor Swift. Where’s she been hiding?

  10. Izzy says:

    Yeah, except at his point, like Kaiser said, the damage is done. The recordings show Swifty to be a manipulative liar, and that backlash isn’t going away any time soon.

    On another note, has anyone seen the tweet put out by her mental midget video director? He compares Swifty to Nicole Brown Simpson as a victim. Not even kidding a little bit.

    • jeanpierre says:

      Really??? What an awful thing to say. Team Taylor has not a bit of shame

    • MP says:

      I did. That’s the most disgusting thing I’ve heard about this whole mess. She lied and got caught. Hardly the same as domestic violence and murder. Oh and being a defense attorney is not the same as “supporting criminals.”

    • mytake says:

      Wait, what!?!? Oh no. That is ALL SHADES of wrong!

    • shelly says:

      Yep he even mentions Swift being a blonde victim, in so many words. Nasty.

      • saltandpepper says:

        Yip. That was particularly nasty. The fact that he would even make a comparison like that is disgusting. All the parties concerned clearly have no scruples. And I am sorry I used to like Tom Hiddles as an actor. Birds of a feather. Yuk, nasty bunch of people from the KKs to the TTs.

    • Naya says:

      Well, we all knew it would be span as an attack on “white womanhood”. I just wondered who her team would use as a surrogate for that message and how it would be framed. As it turns out they used an asian male which you have admit is smart. It had to come from a PoC or it would read very badly to anybody not full blown racist. Also, rather than draw direct comparison between OJ and Kanye, they went the round about way by using Kims dad. Underhanded but also smart.

      I hope nobody is going to act like this director who said nothing of Katy or Calvin or her other feuds, wasnt coopted by Taylors team to deliver that disgusting message.

      • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

        Oh Naya,

        This is a big white fragility moment in which the person constantly described as ‘harmless’ and ‘great role model’ got exposed as publicly conniving and destructive. It occured to me that Taylor is the Blake Lively of the music business (though to her credit with a lot more discernible? talent) she’s been skating hard as hell through life using her sweet Apple pie making blonde image against EVERY one.

        Kanye can be gross but she took that phone call, she was happy as Skittles on that recording, saying “She didn’t know it was being recorded” while being in touch with ANY member of the Kardashian clan is delussionsal. Saying it was this particular phrase or that particular statement when she happily clomped onto the Grammy’s stage and said how she’d never let someone else take credit for her work and that she never even took that phone call in the first place was just amazing.

        And the most amazing thing of all is…I honestly believe if she had just left it as is Kim and co. wouldn’t have released the video. I think as they realized she was going to ride this new victim train and “I’m a survivor” persona that it was better to sink her with the truth than let her paint them all as monsters. Better or worse Kanye told the truth, I know damn well if he called my phone And told me that line I’d have told him hell no, but she didn’t and even had plans to laugh when confronted on the red carpet and say how she was in on it. No more lies to cover her this time.

      • Abby_J says:

        I think most sane people would see that comment as awful and at the very least, vaguely (if not flat out) racist, no matter who said it.

        Sadly, ultimately Taylor will get a pass on all of this and her next album will be a #1 hit.

      • Jwoolman says:

        Eternal- Swift honestly didn’t sound happy as Skittles to me on the call. There were a lot is signs that she was trying to be cool about it but had mixed feelings. I can believe she just isn’t good at sorting things out on the spot, and Kanye isn’t good at picking up on nuances. So they both were interpreting things very differently and neither was trying to deceive the other. As somebody said somewhere, “What we have here is a failure to communicate.”

        Kim needs to post the whole call and especially needs to send a copy now to Swift (as should have been done at the time if they were so concerned about proof of anything). If Kim were really interested in defending Kanye rather than her show’s ratings, she would have done that months ago.

        If I were Kanye, I would be wondering what else Kim has in her archives about me and how she intends to use it some day. But maybe he’s way too trusting. Kim’s behavior in all this is disturbing, she is definitely trying to promote more conflict as well as publicity for herself. I suspect this is another misstep for her, just as her rush to divorce in her 72 day marriage generated a lot of dislike for her that she didn’t anticipate. Once the dust settles and people get over the feeding frenzy and start thinking things through more carefully, Kim may not look so good.

    • Christin says:

      Her paid person said that? Time for Nicole’s sister to speak up.

      • shelly says:

        It turned a petty but amusing spat, into something much more unpleasant. She should ask him to retract it before this really gets out of hand.

      • Christin says:

        One of my biggest peeves is when someone sits by and let’s friends or associates say terrible things on their behalf, without stopping it. It’s the coy, “Oh, I cannot help what they said.” Yes, you certainly can put the brakes on it, if that person values your friendship or business relationship.

      • Miss Jupitero says:

        He did! I saw that! My jaw was on the floor! He compared Tay Tay to Nicole Simpson!

    • Pinky says:

      That is disgusting. That’s racial politics 101 and she’s allowing that to happen and affiliating her brand with that mess? Now my ire is complete.

      –TheRealPinky

    • Alex says:

      It was vile. Its bad enough her family has to deal with her murder year after year because of pop culture but this tweet was ridiculous. and yet again Team Taylor trying to paint her as a victim as if she didn’t blatantly lie in the first place

    • Ronaldinhio says:

      again the optics of a blonde white woman being murdered by a black man
      i. can’t. even

    • Maire3 says:

      Her ENTIRE team is thin-skinned. You can trace this back to 2010 with Scott Borchetta’s response to anyone who dared question Taylor’s (in)ability to sing live – when year after year, she was winning country music awards for VOCALIST of the Year.

      http://www.npr.org/sections/monkeysee/2010/02/a_response_to_taylor_swifts_la.html

      • Sarah says:

        I just listened to her 2010 Grammy performance. She was off-pitch, flat, out of breath, really sounded like a 10 year old Amateur. Then when Stevie Nicks came out and they sang together, she was all showy, and swinging her head and arms around and hit such flat notes that Stevie kept looking over at her!!! It’s very funny!! Taylor has terrible control of her voice, she needs to stop with this PR nonsense and go take some voice lessons!!!

    • lucy2 says:

      That is the worst. Truly.

  11. SilverUnicorn says:

    I am team no-one here. It seems a rush to the bottom in terms of pettiness and lies. If she sues we get more articles about her in the future, which I hope it won’t happen. Swifty overload, it’s a pity I am an unicorn who cannot do any magic and send all of them up to the moon.
    Any veranda open today? In UK it’s scorching hot! I can bring cider and ice cream.

  12. Original Kay says:

    I hope she does. He has been harassing her for years, enough already.
    This isn’t ok, how he basically has stalked her.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      I agree. I’m not blind to her faults but he has used her over and over to gain publicity for himself and he deserves whatever he gets for it. Legally, I mean.

      • honeybee blues says:

        And what about her blatant public slander of him, huh? She broke the law first by publicly slandering him, which is why she CAN’T sue. He can’t use the recording in a court of law, but there were myriad witnesses in that room who heard the conversation and they can testify. He could ruin her financially if he could prove that her slander hurt his sales. She does not want to pull at that thread. If she sues, he will counter sue and then she’s really screwed, as in a civil case, they can depose anyone they want to discredit her. And you just KNOW his side would depose Katy, John Meyer, etc. All of her skeletons would come tumbling out of the closet at once and on record. She won’t sue.

      • Naya says:

        Since when did Kanye need Snake Barbie to get publicity? He just needs to give one of his off his chain interviews extolling his greatness and the media cycle revolves around him for two weeks. Apparently, Snake Barbie is allowed to reflect on her life in her music but other people arent. Ok.

        She should be glad he ran it past her, shes never accorded any of her subjects that same courtesy. Instead, she tried to bury him on a podium during the biggest night in the industry so who used who to boost their public image here?

    • AlleyCat says:

      She legally can’t sue him. It wasn’t taped through the phone, it was considered overheard which is legal in California. While Kanye definitely has issues, he’s not stalking Taylor. Let’s not be dramatic. He was shoved under the bus by her and her team and he is defending himself. I would be too.

    • Lucy says:

      I don’t see how it’s stalking, looks like they’ve both been using each other for publicity.

    • Bonzo says:

      She’s the one that set off this latest feud with her Grammy’s speech. If she truly had a problem with the lyrics (the concept of them sleeping together because he made her famous) she should have said something at the time she heard them rather than publicly, after she said she’d support him.

      As much as I don’t care for Kimye, Taylor doesn’t have a leg to stand on here.

    • Original T.C. says:

      Harassing and stalking? WTH. They have had a mutual back and forth in public. No reports of Kanye hiding out in bushes or making unwanted contact with her. They refer to each other as friends in the recordings. She has won multiple awards, public sympathy, and general good-win over the years due to Kanye’s poor behavior at one event at a MTV awards show. And he apologized.

      I’m sorry but how is it possible that EVERYONE who interacts with Taylor Swift (male or female) wrongs or hurt her? Even Mother Theresa never made that claim. Kanye West can be a jerk and an egomaniac, you will not get any arguments from me or other celebitchies. But I have no problems with someone defending their reputation from slander. I too recorded a co-worker who was spreading lies to my boss and co-workers about me.

      Taylor has been selling herself as an innocent snowflake and perpetual victim. Kanye and Kim no matter how much they are hated have revealed that she is fake and a liar. I have no love for the National Enquier but they were given credit for exposing politician John Edwards as a fake and a liar. People don’t like fakes. Especially fakes who sell an image of goodness and butterflies but are discovered to be the opposite. See other family values politicians caught having affairs or having same sex relationships.

    • original kay says:

      I received an award at work! I was VERY excited to have been chosen. While accepting my award, a co worker jumped up beside me, grabbed my mic, and told everyone there how I was not as deserving as someone else.
      Back and forth it went. He even used my name when he was frustrated about his own work, when I had absolutely nothing to do with it (see- kayne’s SNL rant).
      He called me, and I basically used platitudes to deal with him, knowing how unstable he is (see Kanye’s extremely public rants about everything- on ellen, in concert, on twitter).
      When faced with actually having to deal with his erratic behaviour via phone, I told him what he wanted to hear- based on the YEARS of dealing with the instability, both in public and behind the scenes.

      just my take on all this. He’s unstable. She lied. I’d lie too, to get rid of him as fast as possible.

      • amunet ma'at says:

        @ Kay
        Nothing in that phone call indicated that she was uncomfortable. She was specific with friendly references to their repaired acquaintanceship. She’s a professional dealing with another professional being recorded in a professional setting. He didn’t call her personal home line but a management number, which is what he mentions at the beginning of the recording when he said he tried to use her Nashville # but it wasn’t working, and she mumbled someone. So in other words, when someone asks your permission to use certain information and we are ALL grown you can’t just lie and say ok. She is the Queen of Suing but she’s going to just roll over and say ok when it is a lie because she is so scared of the angry black man. No that excuses her behavior when it is unacceptable. Lastly, all of this happened because of her reaction at the Grammy’s. She knew she talked to him regarding the song but decided to do a speech using the angry black man archetype. That’ s just wrong.

    • holly hobby says:

      Well if she does, get ready for the depositions. The depositions explores everything and anything. All said under oath. Missy will have to be honest for once in her life. The last time a big shot tried to sue was Tom Cruise vs. Bauer Publishing. Google that and tell me how it went with Tommy.

  13. Annieb says:

    On Instagram Calvin Harris started following Kimsgoingtojailparty account and liked some photos they posted. http://calvvinharris.tumblr.com/post/147613074402/dont-be-fooled-by-the-very-devious-yet

    They are all confusing me.

  14. DavidBowie says:

    This will all blow over. In a year no one will give a d*mn about it. There will be another scandal for us to consume.

  15. Louise177 says:

    I doubt Taylor will sue. It will hurt her image even more than if more lies and half truths get exposed. I think the saying is something like it’s not the crime, it’s the cover-up.

  16. Betti says:

    Of course there r additional videos that Kim is sitting on, there is no way a player like her will play her full house so early on. What we’ve seen so far is probably not the most damning and I now think that Kim has evidence that Taylor DID approve the b@tch line on top of permission at being recorded. Kim isn’t finished with swifty yet. This gift has more to given, Taylor will shoot herself in the foot as she can’t help herself.

    • Naya says:

      People wondered why she used snap chat. Its pretty obvious now it was because that would allow her to save some ammunition without seeming to do so. She’ll say she didnt want to post a dozen snap chats so she had to edit the extra juice but since Taylor is calling bs, here’s the full thing. Also, genius way to keep Taylor guessing. Taylor has to be sweating over what else they have on her and when they’ll release it.

    • Dani says:

      Didn’t Kim say on the show that Taylor even said she’s gonna go on the Grammys red carpet and say she wrote the whole song for him? I bet she has that on tape too. Kim is more calculated and waaaaay more clever than anyone assumes.

    • Marianne says:

      While that is a possibility, I kind of doubt it. Otherwise Taylor would be a complete idiot to keep saying she didn’t know (both about the word bitch and being recorded).

      • Naya says:

        You seriously over estimate Taylor. She probably is that idiot. This reminds me of the argument the GOP is using to defend Melania from the plagiarism charge i.e. that she would have to be stupid to do that. Well, yeah but she is stupid.

  17. CoKatie says:

    Wow. This is an unfortunate example of youth. Where you don’t know when to back down. I thought that was what she paid the many advisors on her team for. To be the adult voice of reason. To find out that she has known about the existence of this recording for months, but STILL take time to school him at the awards show, and to continue up to yesterday saying she never gave permission. Sheesh. How and what did she think she was going to gain here? Too stupid. And by the way? #TeamNoOne

    • als says:

      Exactly. I don’t get it. Why lie, then press the lie to annoying extremes?
      And her speech at the Grammy’s looks so hypocritical and provocative knowing what we now know. I can only imagine Kanye and Kim’s faces when they watched that speech.

      Of course, considering how many times she played Kanye and left him being the big, bad wolf, maybe she thought she could pull it off this time too. If it wasn’t for Kim, chances are she would have played him again.

    • Christin says:

      It’s a competition, worthy of middle school. This shows that having good advice and following it are two different things.

      Also Team No One, hoping they all fade into deserved obscurity sooner rather than later.

    • holly hobby says:

      I think she suffers from being overly loved. I noticed that a lot in my kids’ school. Many children are overly loved and entitled. The parents would say, “it’s not my kid’s fault.” “It’s the teacher’s fault or staff or the other kids.” When you grow up being praised as the next best thing to Jesus, it’s a little hard to take, “No.” Blame her folks.

    • Sarah says:

      Yes, youth. And entitlement. And privilege. And never being held responsible for all the crappy things you’ve done and gotten away with.
      All of it.

  18. HeyThere! says:

    Announcing tiddlesbang engagement in 5,4,3,2….

    Seriously, all of them are famehoes. This will never end!

  19. Pepper says:

    If she was going to do it she’d have done it by now.

    She had her little response pre-prepared and Kim made it clear she’d go public months ago (which would have been Taylor’s cue to make nice and stop misrepresenting everything, but she blew it). If there was anything she could successfully do she’d have done it before it all came out. Her team is desperately trying to bury it now, because getting the videos and snakes removed is the best they can do.

    Kanye hasn’t done anything with all his footage yet and from what he’s previously said he doesn’t even know what exactly it’s for yet, so he won’t have sent her a release prior to receiving the lawyers letter. Thus she had to have known she was being recorded.

    • Miss Melissa says:

      Agreed.

      I also don’t think her issue has ever been the “have sex” lyric OR the “that bitch” part of the lyric. The issue has always actually been that he said he made her famous, and it grated on her.

      Hence her 180 after hearing the completed work and knowing she was recorded giving her permission.

      She changed her mind after she heard the full context on the completed work and got angry. Then went full victim mode.

      She has no clue how to rise above anything. That is a level of grace, maturity and dignity she simply does not have. She is the master of dishing it out but cannot take it. She is simply too immature, narcissistic and self absorbed. It’s scary how much she is like my youngest sister.

      • als says:

        I can’t imagine how she approved those lyrics about her when Kanye called.
        They are offensive. There is no art in them.
        Maybe the moment she heard them she got so mad and decided to frame Kanye from the get go.

      • Lucy says:

        It’s all PR. If she’d insisted Kanye not mention her in his lyrics she’d have missed a whole boatload of PR. The fact her very first response was to worry about overexposure is very telling.

        I honestly doubt she gives a shit about misogyny, only whether things will help her career and image or not.

  20. Erinn says:

    Regardless of what team you’re on – I think it’s INCREDIBLY sketchy to record someone without their knowledge. It might be legal in some states, but my god – that doesn’t make it ‘okay’. Just… as a decent human, that’s not something you do.

    I post a decent amount in defense of Taylor, but honestly, I’m not a giant fan. I have mixed feelings about her, though they’re mainly positive. I don’t think she’s a saint, I don’t think she’s 100% innocent because – news flash, nobody ever is.

    I think that Kanye really thought he was doing something nice by calling – and technically he was – but I don’t think either party have handled this well. I think that there’s a good chance some lyrics got changed, and from her conversation it sounded like her saying ‘go ahead and tell your story the way you felt it’ but that doesn’t mean she wouldn’t tell it as it happened to her.

    I also tend to think Kim is clearly benefiting from this attention – that chick thrives off of this stuff. Maybe her intentions were good when it came to recording stuff in an effort to keep Kanye safe, or whatever. But nothing she does is altruistic. I think largely, she sees another celebrity getting more heat than she is, and she jumps on that train in an attempt to keep the attention on someone else so it doesn’t shift back to hating on the K-train too soon.

    I have no use for Katy Perry. She supposedly has a great raw voice – but she seems like a complete moron. If she focused more on making music – and better music than the Olympic song, and that god-awful “This is How We Do” – and dropped the offensive imagery she keeps using in her videos – maybe I’d start to take her more seriously. Because it seems like lately she’s just waiting in the wings for drama to start. She’s not even doing it herself – she’s riding on the coattails of people (Diplo, Calvin, etc) to do her dirty work for her. I think that’s just so incredibly pitiful. Why would anyone want to live like that – just waiting for people to mess up around you? I will give her credit on the gif selection, even if I don’t agree with her having to pop her two cents into it.

    As far as Taylor goes – lord. I’m not on the bandwagon of thinking she has no real friends, or that she’s the most bland of vanilla boringness. I think she probably does have a few very tight-knit friends, and maybe they’re not all celebrities. I think it would be incredibly hard maintaining real friendships with that kind of level of fame – look at people like JBeibs – he’s surrounded with yes-men disguised as family and friends. I also don’t think it’s fair to jump on her for how many people she’s dated, or for her wanting credit for a song she did write. For all we know they agreed to reveal the writing sometime after the song was released. I honestly don’t think I’d have ever pursued legal action in this matter if I were her though. It doesn’t help. The damage was done already, and suing isn’t going to fix that. I think it’d be in her best interest to just go about her summer – enjoy hanging around with TH, maybe get another kitten or something. Just keep busy, and do positive things. I understand how she’s got some conflicting feelings about feminism – when I was in my Jr High years I didn’t want to be considered one. I wanted to be liked by guys, and for the longest time the only kinds of feminism I saw were depicted in a terrible light. The older I get, the stronger my feelings have gotten in terms of how much women have to fight to get ahead, how much we have to do to just be considered. I think that there would have had to have been a point where I was sending mixed messages just like Taylor, but luckily I wasn’t in the public eye.

    • LB says:

      I actually think Katy Perry has handled things right. She’s been dropping clues for years that T Swift isn’t the pristine princess she or the media claims her to be. But nothing too extreme. Nothing like a song about her enemy anyway. A few retweets or a quick comment when Katy’s understanding of Taylor is corroborated isn’t that bad. She’s earned it after that Taylor made a posturing video with her friend army.

      I think ED Roste is probably enjoying this at well. He’s been telling people for years that Taylor is problematic and was harassed off Twitter for it.

      • Erinn says:

        I don’t know. It’s one thing to agree with the criticism – but when you’re consistently only ever jumping on other peoples’ threads and tossing in emoticons or favorites, or whatever- and you have a legit reason to be angry at someone but aren’t actually calling them out for what they did – it’s pathetic. Either shut up, or actually come out with some sort of story on it. It’s the equivalent of that facebook friend who constantly posts vague status updates for attention, but doesn’t ever say what they’re about. It’s lame. Hell – she can go write a song about it too. Nobody is stopping her.

      • LB says:

        Taylor’s pretty influential in the industry. Not that Katy isn’t also popular but it isn’t Taylor levels and even she knows it. I can see why Katy doesn’t want to take that on herself.

      • Maire3 says:

        @LB. Taylor’s influence has long been bolstered by her twitter fan base. Wynonna Judd learned this the hard way back in 2009 when she had to roll back her comments & issue an apology. No doubt, this has influenced Katy and many others in the industry.

    • Lela says:

      Can I cosign this Erin? I think you hit all marks on the head! No one comes out of any of this looking good, but you have worded it better than I ever could ..

    • ahania says:

      I always thought that celebrities are mostly aware that business calls are not private.

    • The Eternal Side-Eye says:

      I somewhat disagree with a lot of your points one being Katy Perry is a loser for ‘riding’ other’s gossip coat tails. I think for a lot of people enjoying this downfall of Swift they feel like she’s been metaphorically ‘burying’ people for years.

      You can’t say anything bad about Swift. If she sings a song about you you have to smile and take it. If you counter her parts and refute and argue you’re labeled a loser like Calvin. She’s sweet Apple pie America and she’s allowed to do anything to anyone else but don’t dare sneeze too hard in her direction or she’ll pen a feminist think piece agaibst you. I think Katy knew she didn’t have the benefit of a recording, that if she did post her own experiences and truth people would label her bitter and a hater and other things you mentioned. She knew Swift’s personality better than all of us and probably knew the time would come when Swift would be caught in a way that couldn’t be painted in her favor. I think she’s just enjoying the world finally seeing what she knew all along.

      But that wasn’t even the part I wanted to disagree with. The recording. Realistically business and pleasure mixes a lot together in the celebrity world. One – the Kardashians are well known reality stars and doing business with any member of the family and expecting NOT to be recorded seems naive at best. Two – perhaps Kanye was afraid Swift would go back on her word and claim she never gave him any approval for the song and that is why he, rightfully, recorded her. Three – whether it’s for a documentary, reality show, or what have you a lot of people record phone conversations when they feel they’ll need to prove something later and in a case like this even if the law was against them, which it doesn’t seem to be, I could see the benefit of leaking the video and putting Swift in a position where she’s too scared to sue.

      • Erinn says:

        I’m cool with disagreement, side-eye. I’m not expecting everyone to just take what I write as law or anything. I just felt like putting my two-cents in like everyone else – and while I don’t hate TS, I do see where she can be called out, and sometimes it’s completely fair. Like I said, I think she made a dumb move with this one.

        I do think a lot of the songs that are CLEARLY about someone specific aren’t always that cut and dry. I think that it’s 100% possible that people read into them way more than it was intended. Some of them are blind items, but some of them really seem to be reaching, ya know? Honestly, a lot of her songs that are about people aren’t really as bad as people make them out to be. There are a few specific things thrown in – but what band/musician doesn’t have a bunch of songs that are inspired by a specific person or situation. Maybe she’s more blunt about it, but most music seems to genuinely be based on personal experience, and almost ever time I look up the meaning of a song I like, there’s a little blurb about how it can go back to an ex-girlfriend or boyfriend, or a friend that isn’t their friend anymore, or what have you. I don’t know if some of it is based on the exposure she gets, or what. But it’s not something that’s only happening on her records.

        I think Calvin was being labeled a loser before TS, honestly. I remember the posts over the Rita Ora thing were mixed – a lot of people were calling him out, some people agreed with him. Personally, I think he was cutting his nose off to spite his face in that situation. Not letting her release the songs didn’t help him financially either – they spent a good deal of time working on those songs – so he’s really in the negatives as far as man hours go for songs that didn’t get released. I think it was soooo dumb even just from a business perspective. With the car crash – people were starting to call him out again for how sketchy that was, and how he seemed to have a giant ego since he didn’t want to stay unless he had a private room. I was mixed on that one – if I were a celebrity, I’d want a private room as well. But if I couldn’t get one, I’d just want to make sure that the nursing staff was discrete when it came to discussing my health. Legally, they can’t go off spouting his medical history anyway. He seems like a man who really really has a problem with ego. I don’t know if it’s tied into recreating himself, or what. Maybe he’s insecure, but he seems to REALLY get up in arms over everything, even when it’s something that is minimal. I guess people say the same about Swift – I think he’s just more vocal about doing it himself instead of making statements through a team – he seems far more driven by emotion than she does.

        The Kardashian’s ARE reality stars, and nobody can escape that. But did she even know Kim was on the call too? I would assume that Kanye has cameras following him alone far less often than the rest of the Klan. I understand that business mixes with pleasure, but when someone’s making what seemed like a pretty spontaneous call, I can see why she wouldn’t think she was being recorded. I know it’s not legally necessary in some states, but a quick “hey I’m recording this” would just be an ethical thing to do. OR OR – if he was concerned about all of this – he could have had someone send off a document to her legal team for her to sign, stating that she had been warned of the song – if he was in fact worried enough to record her as proof. We’re assuming it was recorded to cover his butt later if she claimed it didn’t happen – which would involve him assuming she would in fact do that. Email off a form – or hell – send a quick text after the call saying “thanks for taking some time to discuss the song with me- I’m glad you’re on board with the lyrics” just to have a paper trail. She’d likely have shot back a text that confirmed that. I just think that the recording – released the way that it was released is suspect. It was done on snapchat of all things – again, profit for Kim. Beyond that, it was done in snippets. We don’t know what was or wasn’t discussed on the parts that were clipped out.

    • Lynnie says:

      Regardless of what team you’re on – I think it’s INCREDIBLY sketchy to not voice your complaints with the song to the artist himself, but instead go on the NATIONAL stage that is the Grammys, say a call never took place, grandstand under the guise of feminism, and then sit back and watch as the media, your fans, and the general public dog/trash/call Kanye a liar. Nevermind the fact that she has backtracked, and change her story countless times to hang onto the shreds of her victim identity. That screams someone who is cold, calculating, vindictive, mean, immature, and all around a nasty person. Not to mention highly unethical. Just… as a decent human, that’s not something you do.

      Sorry if it feels snarky, but I just don’t get how your can feel generally positive about Taylor in light of all that. And that’s just the one incident. Does she have good qualities? I guess, but that starts to look suspect when you pull stunts like this.

      • Marianne says:

        @Erinn : I agree that the one thing that bothers me is that people are still bringing up the fact that she wrote songs about her exes as some sort of proof of she being a “snake”. Like, Adele has 3 whole albums out relationships, yet I dont see people dragging her. *Eye roll*. It is a pretty common thing for musicians to write about.

        @Lynnie : Im sure most of us have been caught in a lie before and found ourselves lying more trying to avoid getting into trouble. It doesn’t make her evil, just makes her human.

      • Tara says:

        Well said, Lynnie.

      • Erinn says:

        Lynnie – it’s fine. I know I’m not in the majority opinion on this, and I get why people hate Taylor. I do think that a lot of the hate she is getting and that Kanye is getting is insane though. It’s just ridiculous.

        She didn’t say that the call never happened, did she? Wasn’t it that the call wasn’t to discuss the lyrics. It was over an hour long call, and Kim’s only released a couple snippets of it. I don’t know what happened during the majority of that call. Maybe Kanye talked about the lyrics the whole time, maybe he didn’t. If she didn’t hear all of the lyrics, or the lyrics as they were recorded, she SHOULD have just said “The call we had did not include the lyrics as they were recorded” and called it a day. She made a dumb move with that one, and she’s paying for it. And maybe I missed something – I completely could have. But there are a lot of people posting saying that she denied the call ever happened period, but I haven’t read anything supporting that, so I’m only going with what I have personally read.

        I looked at a transcript from her speech – I really REALLY don’t see anything horrible about that. In the released recordings she told Kanye to write the lyrics how the story went for him – how he felt. Just because she said go ahead, write that line because you didn’t know me, and at that time that’s what you felt doesn’t mean that she is accepting his version as fact. Kanye DIDN’T make her famous. The girl was already successful. The speech could just as easily be about Calvin when it comes to undercutting her work/taking credit. I don’t see it as a denial or a backtrack. After the Kanye stage thing back in… I don’t even know 2009? Somewhere in there – I believe that it probably did make her focus on work. Nothing in that speech (from the transcript I read) seems false.

        Kanye entertains me at times – some of his music is great- but for the most part, the man is off the rails. From what I PERSONALLY have read/watched in regards to him – he does have a tendency to spout a lot of angry non-sense. Sometimes he’s right. Sometimes he’s not. I personally recall him saying that he had ‘baby tourrettes’ that makes him ‘tell the truth’ in the past. I’ve watched him go off on Amber, and Wiz, and multiple other people. He has had feuds with just as many people as Taylor does. I see a lot of “nobody can make comments about Taylor without her lashing out” and that sort of thing. This also describes Kanye. He can’t let things go. He has a history of misogynistic actions and lyrics. He’s tweeted his support for Bill Cosby. So maybe I’m biased about Kanye the same way other people are biased about Taylor. I do think a lot of the hate he is getting is in relation to how much people hate the K-Klan, and because Kim was involved in the story. Really – even around here, almost every post up until recently Kim could have said the sky was blue and people would have called her a liar. If she said she had a salad, people would have said it was clearly scripted for the show. I think some of that hate he’s getting is honestly directly related to the level of hate people have for the Kardashian’s.

        At the end of the day – a call was made. Some or all of the lyrics were discussed and she hasn’t handled this situation well at all. She absolutely needs to apologize about a lot of things. I don’t think that that means that Kanye hasn’t been a jerk to her at times too – maybe this song was an attempt to just clear the air. Who knows.

      • Abby_J says:

        I think the Adele difference is that I have no idea who her songs were about. Taylor seems to make sure everyone knows.

    • Jwoolman says:

      The appropriate thing to do would have been to give Swift a copy of the recording for her own records, since it was a professional matter. That would have prevented all the he said she said nonsense.

      It was very inappropriate to hold on to the recording until Kim needed a ratings bump months later and then post 10 second excerpts on SnapChat. If he had used the material in a documentary, he would have obtained a release from her to use it.

      If Kim continues to post snippets, we know she is editing something out. Post the whole stupid thing in its entirety on your website, Kim, and let people decide for themselves.

  21. HeyThere! says:

    The one thing I really feel for Taylor on is KW obsession with her over the years. I’m sure it’s beyond annoying. Overall she did a stand up job of ignoring it. KW loves power and money. Taylor has lots of both and he can’t seem to get enough of her! I have only seen tiny clips of his creepy date rape looking music video, but refuse to watch it because it just doesn’t seem legal that you can get exact wax creations of a real life person, then video them naked?!?!?! What world do we live in that THAT is okay? It seems wrong on so many levels.

    • honeybee blues says:

      Then why does she keep courting his attention? You know, like her Grammy speech. He may have started the war, but she’s been stoking every battle flame since. She is the one who couldn’t leave it alone, and in so doing, she slandered him. By saying that call didn’t happen, she was calling him a liar. Publicly. Would you have rolled over and taken that?

    • jeanpierre says:

      She is the one obsessed with him.

  22. Anon says:

    She might persuade the authorities to pursue a criminal charge against Kanye and/or Kim. Or she might not – that isn’t her call to make.

    She can decide herself whether or not to pursue a civil claim. But as a lawyer my question is, what loss has TW suffered that is compensable in damages? I can only speak for the situation in England/Wales, but in my jurisdiction she would get zero damages for damage to her reputation – the rationale being that if she lied, she has no right to a reputation as a person who didn’t lie. She might get nominal damages for invasion of privacy, but really very little for one phone call. If the court accepted that she was using her right to privacy as a cloak for libelling someone and getting away with it, she would probably get nominal damages – like £1.

  23. LAK says:

    Kanye has been inviting a lawsuit since he released the music video. No one took the bait. Taylor is an idjit for getting sucked into suing him because that is exactly what he wants.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      Oh, you’re right. I forgot about that. Smart you.

    • Jegede says:

      Good Point LAK.

      I just remembered his recent ‘controversial’ video.
      And the subsequent “Someone sue me already.” quote

    • Dlo says:

      I think the video being ignored pissed off both Kanye and Kim. I am soooo glad he was virtually ignored when he really wanted to be seen. And is it true what he spent on those naked wax figures? $750,000? And Kim willingly rolling around naked with them? 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

    • Jill says:

      Bingo! You hit the nail on the head. Kanye and Kim are relishing the spotlight right now and they are doing it stepping on Taylor’s back. Kanye is the worst when he feels he is being ignored.

  24. Talie says:

    Her best bet at this point is to just go into hiding for a bit. I think she made a mistake even releasing a statement. She should just admit defeat on this one and move on. You know when it comes time, she is going to do some big article for Vanity Fair or Vogue and go full victim.

  25. lynn says:

    Taylor’s speech was also tongue in cheek….she was just doing exactly the same thing he did.

  26. Betti says:

    Personally I think Kim has other and more damaging videos and she wants Taylor to publicly apologise to Kanye for the things she said, if Taylor doesn’t apologies, and I don’t think she will, Kim will release the other videos that in effect will kill Taylor’s image and damaged her career quite badly. swift is messing with the wrong mean girl.

    Taylor can’t sue and she can’t keep quiet, hiding in Australia hoping it will all go away. It won’t, she needs to man up and admit what she did and apologise, otherwise Kim will go for the jugular.

  27. Div says:

    I was talking to my cousin (who is a lawyer) last night and she said that the two party laws here in California are very strict. As in people have successfully argued that they had the expectation of privacy even in a public place…..A comment on Gawker also said something similar about California being one of the strictest states when it came to wiretapping.

    So, I’m thinking TMZ is either on Kimye’s payroll OR while Kimye knows they are in the wrong they trust their expensive lawyers to be able to drag it out or find a loophole. Also, I feel like they know Taylor couldn’t suffer the PR damage by pressing charges.

    I’ve defended Taylor, as petty as she can be, in the past but in this case I feel like there are no winners. She looks petty and like a liar even if she is telling the truth because she implied she wasn’t aware of any of the lyrics. Kim did something illegal and messed up. Kanye is misogynistic as always. So team no one. However, it also bugs me that Kimye will skate away with being sketchy AF by recording someone and breaking the law. The media/people are so happy about Taylor’s backlash that they are letting an incredibly effed up, borderline illegal act to slide.

    • Betti says:

      Legally it would be a long and expensive court case. For a PR perspective it’s the worst case scenarios for her, it makes her look really bad and even more sketchy than she looks now but this is always the victim Taylor so I think she’ll sue. There is no way in hell she will admit she lied and apologise for it.

    • K.C. says:

      I agree. They just all look bad in this situation. Which is honestly a bit of a shame, because I think Kanye had good intentions asking her about it and Taylor had good intentions for going along with the idea. It’s clear that some points weren’t communicated properly along the way and spun into…this. It has all been blown so far out of proportion.

      I too am uncomfortable with the fact that Kimye is being praised for something that should be considered illegal just because the target isn’t well-liked.

    • Stacey says:

      Exactly. People claiming that one-party consent laws are stronger than two-party consent laws are full of it. Even in federal or interstate cases, if one of the recorded parties is in California, then the judges usually side with California laws because of their strength.

      I don’t think any of them are winners here and I think what Kim/Kanye did was utterly scuzzy. I don’t mind seeing Taylor get taken down a peg but how can anyone cheer the garbage human beings known as Kim and Kanye.

      • Carla says:

        Yes we are all happy Taylor and her hypocrisy has been taken down a little but here’s the thing I cannot possibly take this as a win coming from Kim, she didn’t do it with noble intentions to defend her wronged husband (very much dislike him as well) no she waited until she could use it on her scripted TV show. She waited until she got a magazine cover she shouldn’t be trying to make it into a I am just defending my husband. No if you were, that video would’ve came out months ago not when it benefited you.

  28. Roxane says:

    Taylor’s defense came out yesterday and it was absolutely embarassing, from Selena to the horrendous Joseph Kahn. I think it’s time for her to disapear.

  29. HK9 says:

    Oh come on. Taylor should just walk away….there are better use for the courts than this.

  30. grabbyhands says:

    Man, she is getting some BAD advice right now.

    Whether or not she has a case is irrelevant. No matter how it slices it just proves to crystalise that she lied through her teeth and didn’t have a problem trying to damage his reputation (it is painful to type any kind of defense of this egomaniac, but it is true) in order to make herself look like some kind of feminist martyr. And that’s not even touching on the ugly racist overtones of the lily white blonde waif being terrorized by the angry black man, especially with the climate of the country being what it is right now.

    This isn’t the Kardashians first trip to the rodeo and I feel reasonably certain that PMK and their pack of lawyers went over this with a fine tooth comb to see if Taylor had any kind of case. And either they’re pretty sure she doesn’t or they feel pretty good about their chances if she goes that route.

    She was outplayed at her own game. She needs to make peace with that and go underground for a while, if her ego will even allow that. As it is, she’s going to be spending a lot of time saying No Comment.

    • Adele Dazeem says:

      Totally agree grabby hands. And for what it’s worth I think the delay in release of the audio/video has something to do with the kardashian klan confirming this was legal. They strike me as people who do their homework about this stuff and what else would explain the delay?

      Taylor needs to just lay low and go off the grid for a while. She was courting overexposure with #taymerica, I would have advised her to go underground even if this hadn’t happened.

  31. honeybee blues says:

    Her people should have called me. “I owe Mr. West an apology. I’m embarrassed to admit this, but before that phone call, I’d been out to brunch/lunch/dinner with friends and had a few too many, and I really don’t remember that call. I can hear it, so I know it’s my voice, but I’m so sorry; I was drunk for the first time in my life [you just know she’d have to say that], and I blacked out.” It’s her only face-save.

  32. JamesBond says:

    “kim and kanye are so fucking sly they recorded that in NY. NY has a 1 party law where you can’t sue if one person is aware a recording is happening. if it had been recorded in california taylor could have sued because california has a 2 party law where both parties need to be aware of the recording. i hate kimye but i’m in awe lol”

    I found this on Tumblr and I’m actually curious if this holds water. God I hope it does and Taylor ends up looking even more like a fool.

    • Alex says:

      They were in cali BUT since the call was in a room full of people she had no expectation of privacy. Also damaging to her case is that kanye records everything when he does albums and chances are clued her into that fact beforehand.

      IE taylor has no case

      • Lucy says:

        Don’t know if it’s true but I read that they were in LA (where it’s illegal) and she was in NY (where it’s legal). Not sure which state has jurisdiction in a situation like this.

      • anon123 says:

        The state where the person releasing the call was, i.e. California.

      • Alex says:

        Right but even in Cali the two party consent rule does not apply if the person is aware of additional parties in the room. Taylor was talking to more than just Kanye in the call. Therefore no case.

        And the rules can be sketchy when the caller and other party are in other states. So its not always cut and dry. Taylor was in NY so chances are even if Kimye weren’t in Cali this case would go nowhere

      • anon123 says:

        @Alex, are you a lawyer in California or are you repeating sources? What you are saying contradicts what I read.

      • anon123 says:

        Just wanted to add this, this is what my understanding is based on
        ““California is an ‘all-party consent’ wiretapping state. What that means is, even on things like a conference call, before you record it, you’re supposed to announce to everyone, ‘I’m going to record this call,’” said Chris Hoofnagle, professor of law at the University of California and an expert on privacy.”

      • AmandaPanda says:

        Chris Hoofnagle?

        That has to be a made up name.

        😂

  33. Margo S. says:

    Lol. She tried to sue but she cant! This keeps getting better and better.

  34. perplexed says:

    Why did she ever release a statement about that song in the first place? Her silence probably would have made it clear that she didn’t like the song.

    I’m shocked at her stupidity on this. I’ve always thought of her as a highly astute and brilliant businesswoman, but maybe what people think of her at all times is her Achilles heel.

    • mee says:

      exactly. and if kanye said that she approved it, she could have refuted it with a clear pointed response that she didn’t approve the “bitch” line as she says.

      anyway, it’s all so silly and i do wonder if we’re all being pulled into this junior high mess as a publicity ploy. it doesn’t do much for taylor, but i was reading comments on other sites and many casual readers (not the investigative journalists we have here:-)) were still on taylor’s side as they thought the recording was illegal/unfair. so it really is a food fight with people on all sides and the people who benefit are the ones at the center – more publicity is always good right??

  35. Alex says:

    She can’t sue since she had zero expectation of privacy. She was talking to other people on speaker. So BOOM there goes the case. Sorry taylor can’t victimize your way out of this one

    • anon123 says:

      I wouldn’t be so sure.
      I wonder where all these theories are coming from?
      Yesterday it was an NY theory, today it is the speaker.

      • Alex says:

        Its not a theory its the law. Taylor is seen on video talking to other people (Rubin for one) while on speaker with Kanye. That’s not a theory you can see it ON VIDEO. Therefore she had no expectation of privacy. Taylor was most likely in NY when the call was made. Again not a theory. Therefore the Cali rule of two party consent does not apply because there were other people on the call and often times when both parties reside in different state the one party rule seems to have prevailed in court.

      • paranormalgirl says:

        but, according to my husband, she still COULD have a case because at no point is Kim seen being involved in the conversation. Kanye could use the recording, but not Kim, since she wasn’t a party in the conversation. The laws are very murky. Where she COULD have a case is in the releasing of the conversation without a signed release. She wasn’t aware she was going to be involved in “Keeping Up with the Kardashians” and if she never signed a release for her voice to appear on the show, she COULD have a case there. But in my opinion, she needs to walk away and lay low for a bit and not concern herself with a lawsuit that would only serve to make this whole thing even more petty.

      • Alex says:

        They did not release it on the show at all so that doesn’t apply either. They released it on a public medium probably because their lawyers advised them NOT to use it on the show because of that very reason. Your husband is right but that’s not how it was released. Plus again with no expectation of privacy taylor also does not have expectation of ONLY kanye owning that recording either

  36. K.C. says:

    I really don’t think it’s true she’s on record about the b**** line. She knows Kim is willing to unleash evidence against her. Why lie in her Instagram post if a recording of her acknowledging the line exists? She has no room to lie at this point.

    • Lynnie says:

      Because she lied about never receiving a call at the Grammys. And she didn’t lie, because she honestly forgot about it, she lied because she thought there was no proof showing otherwise and that she could get away with it. The same might be happening here with the b*tch line.

  37. Lucy says:

    Disingenuous PR robot exposed as disingenuous PR robot. Big effing deal.

  38. If she had a case or really wanted to sue Kanye, she would have done it by now. This “thinking about it” is just a bluff.

    I said before she wouldn’t because either she knew or should have known it wasn’t a private convo. Or she does have legal grounds but knows if she goes through with it they’ll make her sit for a deposition and there’s no way she’s going to be asked a slew of questions under oath by Kanye’s lawyers. Kanye & Kim win this either way. She screwed her image and got caught red-handed playing victim while slandering & lying about him.

    • mee says:

      agreed – if she wanted to sue, she would have done it BEFORE the tape came out. it’s either not a strong legal case or she doesn’t want to go through w/all the hassles of litigation plus the PR damage that could ensue. But mentioning the lawsuit is a way to deflect the conversation back to how she was wronged, yet again.

  39. anon123 says:

    I hope she sues Kanye and steamrolls them all – him and the Kardashians. It is the least they deserve.
    In the end she is going to come out as a winner in this. And just think how many songs she can write about the drama. it could be a whole album of “Kanye done me wrong”.

    • Lynnie says:

      Ah yes, because the whole “Kanye done me wrong” thing worked so well for her at the Grammys and is exactly the reason why she’s not in this mess. Oh wait…

      • Roxane says:

        Lynnie@ “Ah yes, because the whole “Kanye done me wrong” thing worked so well for her at the Grammys and is exactly the reason why she’s not in this mess. Oh wait… ” Right, No one is saying Taylor is over, but her image is a mess.

  40. CidySmiley says:

    It’s like I said yesterday, I don’t think half of these defenses are actual in defense of Taylor Swift but more along the lines of opposite Kanye West. Hate KK and KW all you want but they’ve never tried to be anything but what they are, they have always presented themselves as is. Taylor is the liar. And like I said yesterday, what’s worse is that Kanye very well could have pulled a classic Eminem and put her in there anyway: but he didnt. He called and talked to her about it, he put their relationship first – and then SHE turned around and stabbed him in the back.

  41. Bishg says:

    Lainey wrote that we’ve been given “The Christmas of Gossip”, and whereas I agree that the past couple of days have been particularly juicy, I am so over this.
    I have been enjoying Taylor’s downfall, mainly because I am pretty indifferent to her music and VERY intolerant towards her captain-of-the-cheerleaders attitude, so on one hand I would like her fall from grace to last a bit longer, on the other hand, I wish she would disappear for a couple of months and let us forget about her existence.
    She’s been exposed as an hypocrite and liar, so I am pretty satisfied.

  42. paranormalgirl says:

    At this point, she needs to stop. Just stop. Let it all go, move forward, and stop being the victim. This would be an awesome time to take some time off, hang with the boyfriend, and come back with an image change.

    • Tara says:

      This ✅

    • Ican't says:

      But this is her 2016 image change . Her 2015 image was girl power I’m a feminist and in 2014 her image was feminism is gross I like boys.

      • Pine Cone says:

        Actually Lainey has an article up saying pretty much what paranormal girl is saying. If Taylor was smart she could use this to re-invent herself. Being the “good girl” is very limiting.

      • Bishg says:

        I agree with Lainey’s take.
        The good girl image was okay when she was a breaking-out artist and her main fan base consisted of teenage girls.
        I didn’t know any of Taylor’s earliest songs, so yesterday I decided to go on YouTube and educate myself. Well, I expected those songs to be cheesy and annoying, but damn! Anyway, I can’t really be surprised at Taylor’s success among teenagers. In her lyrics, she deals with familiar issues (friendship, jealousy, the first heartbreaks etc..) in a very petty, “high-school drama” way. She used to present herself with a squeaky-clean image of the pretty, yet still goofy and awkward blonde, so that girls wouldn’t be jealous of her and could still relate. Nice touch.
        After a few visualisations, I got tired soon looking at all her silly gestures and smirks. And even now, after 1989, she is still as immature and juvenile as then. Her music video all look like chapters of the Taylor Swift’s Perfect Fairy tale, where she’s either the invincible warrior, kicking ass in stilettos and body-tight latex, or the queen of the castle, moving her sceptre around and throwing curses at all the boys who dare treat her any less good than what she thinks she deserves.
        Taylor is now 27, she has successfully navigated from country to pop princess. Those antics are ridiculous. It’s about time she changed her narrative. She’s not credible nor appealing anymore, so she needs to re-invent herself into a new character. I am sure, like Lainey and so many other observers has said, that this is not the end of Swifty. But, still, she could just have reached the highest peak in her career and never be able to climb back, so she must be very careful how she comes back after the summer.

  43. Pmnichols says:

    She needs to just let it die. She is killing her career and image. Oh how the mighty have fallen.

    • Marianne says:

      I highly doubt it will kill her career. I bet most of the people trashing her are gonna tune in when she drops her next album to see what she wrote about this mess. More views/downloads for her.

  44. Manjit says:

    So much bull shit, so little talent.
    If anyone involved in this saga was really as talented as they thought they were, they wouldn’t need to continually keep themselves in the public consciousness by pulling stunts like these. Bunch of narcissistic, spoilt brats the lot of ’em.

  45. Cali says:

    Taylor is talented and should get back to writing songs and ignoring Kimye. And also donating to charities, unlike Kimye.

  46. Grace says:

    Just a thought. I don’t know enough about Taylor Swift to know if this is the case. Could this be like a Good Wife ep: she knows she can’t win but she wants to sue for the sake of everyone knowing she’s suing?

  47. deevia says:

    People were saying that they needed some distraction from horrible real-world events and when their favorite brings it (or fall spectacularly with it), people quickly say they want this to go away LOL. I hope Taylor does sue so I can watch more trainwrecks.

  48. Marianne says:

    If there are more videos out there where Taylor is aware of the lyric “I made that bitch famous” then why still deny it? Wouldnt it just make more sense to have said something like “I did not like the song/appreciate the song/approve of it but was too afraid to hurt his feelings or whatever so I said to go ahead and use it or whatever. And then say she regrets not being more honest and upfront and defend herself directly to him earlier or something.

  49. Llamas says:

    I wonder if Taylor was and is aware of the word ‘Karma.’

    • HK9 says:

      Apparently not, and judging by her behaviour, I think there will be lots more Karma to come.

  50. Capella says:

    They need to hire a new videographer because that footage stinks!! Oh wait, for some reason Kim felt like she also needed to tape the phone conversation and both she and Kanye made sure he lured Taylor in with how he has a responsibility to her as a friend (roll eyes) and how they need to build trust … its all gross and premeditated. I know so many guys who talk like that to seduce girls and then treat them disrespectfully afterwards. The next phase is gaslighting which is blaming the victim for questioning why actions and words don’t quite align. She tells him he is so sweet etc. because that’s what girls do when they are misguided to believe the other party has a right to malign them because they are more powerful or more cool AND there will be repercussions if they don’t go along. All of it is emotionally manipulative and Kanye is such an a**hole. He arrogantly stole Taylor Swift’s moment at the VMA’s in 2009 and people can say she has acted like the victim but, she was only 20 years old and ever since, Kanye west has passively aggressively and aggressively kept her in his world because he has an obsession, not with her but with something I don’t even pretend to understand. “I made that bitch famous??” seriously?? Dude, work on your lyrics if you don’t “… want to do rap that makes people feel bad.” In context, these lyrics suck and at the very least are so unenlightened and unnecessary. Taylor’s voice on that conversation sounds like someone who is trying to act cool and go along with something she hasn’t processed yet. I’m not a Taylor Swift fan but, I really can’t stand what Kanye is doing with the help of Kim.

    • Ican't says:

      Please Taylor knew exactly what she was doing let’s not try to make a victim out of someone who not one.

      The fact that when in the recording studio Kanye recorda everything includingincluding phone calls is a known fact.

      Not to mention is Taylor was unsure of thing she would have asked to hear the song before it was released. Which she didn’t and sign off on what ever he did.

      • Jwoolman says:

        We don’t really know what he or she said for most of the phone call. Kim posted it on a platform that only allows 10 second videos. The phone call might have been as long as an hour, but it certainly was much longer than what has been posted.

        Kim could have posted it in its entirety elsewhere. The fact that she didn’t is suspicious in itself. This is the same woman who has edited and faked scenes months later to smear other people on her show and uses leaks of baseless tumors for the same purpose. We have no good reason to believe that we know even a fraction of the whole story. We only know the spin given repeatedly by Kim, a pathological liar. It’s working only because enough people don’t like Taylor Swift and are gleeful about “taking her down” for her sins. (Honestly, the Internet is such a childish mean girls food fight these days… ). But that’s not a good enough reason for grownups to stop applying logic to the situation.

  51. Marcy says:

    I think every party has acted wrong, immature, and it’s gotten out of hand. It’s like Mean Girls times ten. They all have damaged theirselves, everyone’s behavior encourages others to call people out, make fun of them, use Social Media as a way to verbally assault or ruin someone for what popularity and monetary gain. Old Hollywood albeit not pristine was more discreet all this as a humanis sickening to me and why I encourage my friends to be smart what you say, do or post. Two wrongs don’t make a right, people have committed suicide over Social Media taunts and backlashes there was better ways for all parties to act. Damage is done and they all need to act like grown ups use their Social Media for good not to attack each other same people who don’t want to be attacked always attacking others. I feel sorry for them all empty cruel hearted people.

  52. popup says:

    Taylor really just needs to sit down for a good long time and disengage from this mess. No more scheming how to get back at Kanye/Kim, whom she should never be “friends” with again, which would just be disingenuous. She should start writing her next album called “Regrets.” It’ll be her image-changing contrition album.

  53. kay says:

    This is going to hurt Kanye more than Taylor because Kim released this. Music industry people may not like Taylor Swift but people really won’t like what Kim did on her show. Most industry people are like Taylor anyway and that is why she is successful.

    • Ican't says:

      No its not Kanye recording is nothing new by the music industry or the public. People already know what Kim and family are about, this is nothing new.

    • Alex says:

      lol if kanye was going to be damaged he would have NO career at this point. Fact is a lot of people like his talent. He is the same as taylor in that way…few people genuinely like them but they like their work. Just look at all the people (past coworkers, exes, former squad members, former friends) that have clearly sided with Kimye. This isn’t going to ruin kanye…this is going to hurt taylor the most. Esp on the heels of a fake romance and Calvin not rolling over for her. People are over the girl and kim is smart she knew what she was doing.

  54. Abby_J says:

    I absolutely HATE Tom Hiddleston. Not because he has a girlfriend that I don’t approve of, not because he’s being a tool, but because I am interested in what he is up to, which means I actively find myself reading this crap.

    I live a very Kanye/Kardashian/Swift free lifestyle, which I’ve enjoyed immensely until now. I would have skipped these stories in a hot minute if there wasn’t the Hiddles angle, but because of my Dragonfly master, I am clicking on all of this crap, and actually have opinions.

    Blast you Tom Hiddleston and your curly haired scruffy look. (which he should bring back immediately.)

  55. deevia says:

    This is not the thing that will finish Taylor, people! But it may show the beginning of the end. The public backlash happens because she has stuck in the same narrative / image / creative corner of the “good girl” for TOO LONG. Taylor shares this same formula with Britney before her breakdown and that’s when the public starts to get tired of her. The breakdown changes the narrative and it’s the first time Britney is “the victim”. Except Taylor already used this to death as well. Now she stucks and that narrative is reaching its shelf life. Madonna can stay relevant for so long because she can re-invent the wheel; and Kim K is the digital-age Madonna (not Gaga who frankly uses all her tricks AT ONCE). I’m curious on what Taylore can do next long-term because getting out of this ain’t solve her problems. One can argue a hit song / album is all it takes BUT don’t forget, she mixes her personal life and professional artwork to the point they are one. It has to be a new package that people can believe inside out that was transitioned from this juvenile image she has – especially with these new skeletons in her closet YET is an exciting narative that can continue its own course. Will be a hard one to crack.

  56. Otaku Fairy says:

    I don’t agree about it being unethical, wrong, or even all that immature for Kimye to release this without Taylor’s consent. Attention-seeking? Definitely. But when someone lies or implies something untrue about you in public to make themselves look good and throw you under the bus, and people don’t believe you (in Kim’s case people didn’t believe her because she’s a known liar and Kanye is known for his delusions) it doesn’t seem wrong to publicly release a recording that shows that they’re not being totally honest.

    • Barbara says:

      You can’t offer as evidence something that was aquired by illegal means.

    • lilacflowers says:

      Why wait five months to release it? If you’re trying to protect yourself from someone’s lies, why wait five months?

    • Rebecca says:

      According to California Law, it is illegal to record a telephone conversation without both parties consent. Since Kanye and Kim broke the law, that makes it unethical. If I were Taylor, I would sue.

      • jammypants says:

        Except what makes the law murky is Taylor consented to talking to a room full of producers. You even hear other people talk on the call. She has no legs on this case.

  57. Beach girl says:

    TS acknowledged sometime this year that she was concerned about being over exposed, and I think she was taking a break to somehow tweek her image into something slightly more mature, maybe with a new direction in her music. I also think being involved with a more mature (sic) man who is in a different entertainment field was part of the plan. Well it’s going to be interesting to see how that’s going to play out now since the Summer of the Backlash.

  58. jammypants says:

    So does that mean Anna Wintour won’t be inviting any of these embarrassing people to next year’s Met Gala?

  59. Reece says:

    Not gonna lie, I kinda want a legal case to go forward.
    I’m on Team No One. I’ve always thought Taylor was/is a fos Mean Girl under the guise of “America’s Sweetheart”. Sadly i have a friend who refuses to see this, because “she’s so good to her fans”. I may not be a Kardashian fan but I’ve always known clearly and precisely what they are. AND if Taylor is stupid enough to open up the can of worms that is legal action then that gives the Kardashian attorneys permission to thoroughly assassinate her character.
    *fluffs up the couch pillows and gets snacks*

  60. Shannone says:

    For the life of me I can’t understand why everyone seems to have their panties in a wad talking about “ruined careers” and whatnot. Could either one of them have handled the situation differently? Of course. But bottom line for me is I like a lot of his music, I like a lot of her music. If I like it, I will spend money on it, if I don’t I won’t. Neither of them is obligated to be someone I want to hang out with and be my new bff. I’m not going to lunch with them. And, honestly, neither of them that I’m aware of has done anything bad enough that would make me boycott them or refuse to buy music I enjoy. As far as ruined careers, I certainly doubt that. A year from now, hell a month from now, this squabble won’t even be on the radar for most people.