Comments on: Tom Cruise & Katie Holmes will try in vitro because they want twins

By: goldiemay

goldiemay — Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:57:37 +0000

There has been speculation and rumours about Tom Cruise’s sexual preference for many many years, so in my opinion, there must be some substance to this. I remember very clearly when he was married to Mimi Rogers – she said he was sterile and couldn’t have kids which is why she divorced him. I also read a very interesting excerpt from a book written by someone who claims he was hired by Tom’s people -to have sex with him at various discreet locations and was paid big bucks to remain quiet.
I don’t get what the big deal is about admitting if he is gay – I mean there are so many gay/lesbians in Hollywood today are it certainly has become far more acceptable that it used to. Look at Rock Hudson, Montgomery Clift etc… they all hid their sexuality out of fear of never working in Hollywood again, however it isn’t like that now.
I don’t believe that Suri Cruise is Tom’s biological father – I just don’t know how long Katie Holmes will be able to last married to Tom having to put up such a front for the world- sad way to live if you ask me.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Vanna

Vanna — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 04:30:15 +0000

Tom is not gay. I know that for a fact and I also know that Tom can’t have kids so Suri has to be Katies ex boyfriends. I know these things for a fact,

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Jill B

Jill B — Thu, 21 May 2009 12:53:39 +0000

What is this celebrity obsession with twins?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: fabulous

fabulous — Wed, 20 May 2009 23:02:40 +0000

Sterile? The MAIN rumour that has been circulating about Tom for years and years is that he is gay. Which would go some way towards explaining the need for IVF, Nicole keeping the unborn baby tissue, etc. etc.

BTW – Scientology is supposed to be able to ‘cure’ homosexuality too.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: CB Rawks

CB Rawks — Wed, 20 May 2009 19:38:06 +0000

The older the dude is, the slower and more *special* the sperm are. Get a donor, Katie. Not that dumb can’t be lovable, but give the kids SOME chance in life. Their surname is handicap enough.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: barneslr

barneslr — Wed, 20 May 2009 13:45:20 +0000

“I sometimes wish that TC woul,d get a paternity tests done on SUri and publish it so these people could shut up and get a life of their own instead of writing this crap so Suri has to live with it when she gets older.”

It wouldn’t matter if he did; they would just claim the documents to be fake. I don’t like TC at all, but I think this level of gossip is hateful and ugly and beyond the pale. This is a child we are talking about here; an innocent 3 year old who has two parents that are clearly devoted to her (even though I think they both have issues). It’s got to be painful for them to hear these stupid, unfounded rumors crop up periodically.

Besides, he has no obligation to prove a thing to anyone about his own child. People can speculate and spread lies all day long (and they do), but that doesn’t put him on the hook for disproving them.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: barneslr

barneslr — Wed, 20 May 2009 13:40:31 +0000

Why do people keep perpetuating the rumors that Cruise is not his daughter’s father? She looks exactly like him. And he has made it abundantly clear that he has no objections at all to adoption, so why would he bother with a charade?

Quite frankly, all of you who trot out this nonsense just sound stupid.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Nony

Nony — Mon, 18 May 2009 21:41:15 +0000

I think the fact that he never had biological children with Nicole had a lot more to do with some traumatic pregnancies/miscarriages that she had early on in the marriage. Trying again might have been too much; plus they were both in the middle of their careers and getting children without being out of the running with pregnancy may have suited them both fine.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: marion

marion — Mon, 18 May 2009 20:56:59 +0000

for goodness sake you people need to stop taking every negative story about them as gospel.
*I READ THE “REPORT” IN INTOUCH AND NOT ONLY DID KATIE’S REP DENY IT, BUT THE MAG CONVENIENTLY LEFT OUT THAT KATIE WILL SPEND THE NEXT 5 MONTHS COMMITTED TO HER NEXT MOVIE.
*THEN THERE IS THE REAL REASON THIS STORY IS BULL&^$%, IF IVF WERE REALLY AN OPTION FOR TOM, WHY DID HE AND NICOLE NEVER CONSIDER IT?
*LASTLY WHAT KIND OF FRIEND SELLS INFO THAT WOULD MAKE A FRIEND LOOK SO SHALLOW?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Nony

Nony — Mon, 18 May 2009 08:42:14 +0000

Katie is not on medication – believe me, it wouldn’t be allowed, or possible to go unnoticed. (how would she get the meds? She’s under 24/7 scientology supervision!)
Scientology has kept people from cancer treatments, from taking epilepsy medication – there’s no way she is on medication.

What she’s on is mind control. Endless staring into other people’s eyes. Endless confessions on a lie detector. And all those confessions are recorded, so if she gets out of line, there’s a whole lot of shit CoS would be happy to release.

Report this comment as spam or abuse