Comments on: Enquirer: Brad & Angelina officially splitting, Brad doesn’t care about custody

By: Miracela

Miracela — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 05:48:35 +0000

heyza
i was look aroung your homepage
and will not leave again
before i was saying hello
it is a nice homepage you have
good luck in future
Hug
Miracela
(¯`•´¯)
…`.•.,(¯`•´¯)
…(¯`•´¯).•´
….`•.,.•´
…….I.
…….I.
…….I.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: maritza

maritza — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:26:15 +0000

Brad and Angelina will always be tied because they have 6 kids, no one can ever break that bond.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: For sure

For sure — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:42:22 +0000

Haters got owned.
Jolie/Pitt popularity is rising…

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Lindsay

Lindsay — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:35:59 +0000

The National Enquirer has been right before, but if this shit was true, they would devote an entire issue to this. S***, they would change their name to BRANGIE IS DEAD Enquirer.

- DListed

That made me laugh. Something needs to happen to get Jon and Kate off the cover of every magazine. Even if it means having Brad and Angie back on the cover of every magazine (with some Jen thrown in there from time to time).

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: nnn

nnn — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 09:30:51 +0000

Their rep confirmed that it is totally false, that they don’t split !

Tabs are stupid.
———————
nnn actually it’s the people that’s stupid for believing it. Enquirer had key words that made this story not believable the moment they read it but they didn’t care and jumped on line with the negative stuff showing that after 5 years they still have not moved on with there lives.
Cons have used fools for centuries and these Brad/Angie haters are so ripe for the picking for these tabloid magazines.

———————–
Agree with you Jami.

Actually, if people were ever dissected the life of other celebrity couples, putting the same cause and effects and correlations, using the same assuptions, they will realise that there are tens of other couples who would have splitted before Brangelina.

I don’t know but for a time we only see Jennifer Garner with her daughter. Tom Cruise is rarelly seen with his wife, ect… Yet no rumors of splitting there when there is a couple who choose to manage their time to work in a partnership mode, a couple whose partner take a break to support the other on official professional show…i don’t think that anyone living in a couple who is about to split will do that. I also don’t see Angelina as the type to fake. She has never had a problem to quit a relationship where she wasn’t happy anymore, even if the feelings were still there.

I would say, the way they are under pressure by the media constant scrutiny and still are together (Didn’t Jolie said something that all that bring them more closer and stronger ?), other couples will break up before them.

Also, I don’t know if there is a cause/effect relationship but i notice that unmarried couple with children tend to stay together more than the married one. I don’t know if there are statistics about it but it’s something that i notice. My take is, since they are not married, they subconsciously behanve, act work even harder to overcome tensions and marital state of neglectness and actually work at making things work everyday when usually married couple at some point forget that they have to work every day at it and take marriage for granted.

I see that in and outside Hollywood, since unmarried couple can walk the door and call it quit easily, they work at staying together even more than married couple do.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Jami

Jami — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 09:12:36 +0000

Their rep confirmed that it is totally false, that they don’t split !

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Ursula

Ursula — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 06:03:16 +0000

Angelina was 32 when she hooked up with Bradley, 5 years later she is 34. WTF???

Of course they will split, it is a matter of when not if. I hope none of you loonies staked your money on them staying together forever. As for Bradley and the kids, I don’t think they can stop him from leaving. Afterall he seemed to love Jen but went on to humiliate her. He is like that. It doesn’t matter if he loves you, he will hurt you.

Something has been going on with Bradangelina and pretty soonn, it will bust. Sorry but I can’t say that I will be weeping.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: BlueSkies

BlueSkies — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 05:35:28 +0000

Bubble is busted. Thanks, Cheyenne.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: hmm

hmm — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 05:30:44 +0000

You need only look at the text of the article to know it’s not true. Typically, if they truly believed the rumor they would have included “Reps for the couple have not returned our calls” or something to indicate that they tried to verify the story. And to the legal experts, there is nothing defamatory or libelous about a break up, thus they wouldn’t have to worry about being sued.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Cheyenne

Cheyenne — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 04:44:02 +0000

The NE has a pretty good track record of checking their sources before they print a story about politicians. They know damn well that if they slander a politician they are going to get sued out the wazoo.

However, their accuracy record about celebrities is lousy. NE is one of the slag rags that said two years ago that Brad was going back to Aniston and taking Shiloh with him.

Oh and BTW, People magazine said that Brad’s rep has already denied NE’s breakup story. Sorry to bust your bubble.

Report this comment as spam or abuse