Stylish Celebrity Escapism
Contributing Writers
Aug 23
'07
Princess Diana’s Dress Too Expensive


How much is a dress worth? It seems one worn (twice!) by Princess Diana can’t secure a bid on eBay.

The silk chiffon evening gown was among 79 dresses that Diana auctioned off for charity at Christie’s in New York in June 1997, two months before she died in a car crash in Paris.

The dress, a strapless bodice made of draped and tucked silk designed by Catherine Walker, is one of four of Diana’s dresses owned by the WE television network and was put up for grabs on eBay 10 days ago.

However, the gown, which was also worn by Diana to the 1989 London opening of Miss Saigon, did not appear to have attracted any bids after opening offers were invited at $US125,000 ($A154,790).

Sydney Morning Herald

Diana also wore the dress to the 1997 Cannes Film Festival. The proceeds from the eBay auction were to go to America’s Promise Alliance, a charity that helps disadvantaged children stay in school.

While bidding for charity isn’t like shopping for a vintage bargain, this dress did seem to be overpriced. In 1997 the winner of the first charity auction won it for $US71,000, and it was later valued at $US275,000.

“If we were to put the dresses up for auction, our auction estimate would be $US20,000 ($A24,766) to $US40,000 ($A49,532) dollars for each of the dresses,” a representative from Christie’s auction house told the Washington Post.

Another Diana dress by the same designer sold at a London Auction for $US121,000. The gown Diana wore when dancing with John Travolta sold for $US222,500.

So, how much is too much to pay for a dress? While the owner of the dress having died very publicly in a horrible car crash would deter me from buying, others obviously don’t feel the same way. The eBay auction (now closed) received over 300,000 hits. Maybe a viewing fee should have been charged?

In the days before the tenth anniversary of Diana’s death, a journalist is claiming she was pregnant when she dies. Yawn, we’ve heard that before. To spice it up he adds that Dodi Al Fayed wasn’t the father.

Hopefully we can get past the ten year anniversary and get back to gossiping about Royals who are alive. Prince William, anyone?

Picture note by Celebitchy: Header image from eBay auction for Diana’s gown. Image below via the Sydney Morning Herald.

Written by Helen

Posted in Princess Diana

Pages: 1 2

On-Page Comments are closed.

Add a comment in pop-up window
(for posts before 4/21/08)
On April 21, 2008, comments were moved from the pop-up Haloscan format onto the page. Older posts still use the Haloscan comments for discussions, and you are welcome to comment there. All new posts use on-page commenting.

Recent Comments:
  • Kat: Ferrell is a great George W. But he better start practicing, because heaven help us, Jeb will be next. Yes,...
  • Sickitten: The most hilarious part is Diddy in a tux crankin’ along on a jetski. Thanks, Diddy, I needed a...
  • Aspen: You know what, Shingles? I haven’t seen Georgia Rule and hadn’t planned to, but on such a...
  • Jill-e-b: I wish people would just calm the hell down about this one. Obama didn’t appoint Rick Warren to be a...
  • Sickitten: It’s funny because about 3-4 years ago he was on a network TV show playing a bartender, being so...
  • Jill-e-b: Um, is she *surprised* that there were photogs lined up around the hotel in Dubai? She was there for the...
  • Sam: Its a long name but it wouldnt be considered too unusual from where I’m from (New Zealand). We have very...
  • NotBlonde: *rolling my eyes at all of you* it was a throw away line. She was answering a question, jeez. Her answer...
 
 

Celebitchy is a celebrity gossip site written by several independent authors. The opinions of the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Celebitchy, LLC. All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Articles are based on rumor, conjecture, and published information in other sources. Celebitchy, LLC makes no claims that content is valid, accurate, or true. Celebitchy, LLC and the authors contributing to it will not be held liable for damages resulting from errors, omissions or falsehoods published on this site. It is not the site or the contributing authors' intention to defame or malign any particular group, religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual. Celebitchy, LLC is not responsible for content on linked or quoted sources. All comments made by visitors to the blog are the responsibility of their respective authors and are only sporadically monitored. Celebitchy, LLC will not be held liable for comments in any way.