T.J. Miller was accused of raping & assaulting a woman in college

The World Premiere of “THE EMOJI MOVIE”

It feels like TJ Miller outed himself as a massive douchebag years ago, but it was actually over the summer. He gave a series of terrible interviews, where he sounded like the biggest mediocre dude-bro who ever white-privileged. I’m sure those interviews were supposed to be read like “oh, isn’t he so funny and isn’t this all just performance art?” No. He’s just basic and awful and snide and rude and real a–hole. As it turns out, he’s also a rapist and an abuser. Surprise.

The Daily Beast spoke to a woman – who does not want her name in the article – who says that TJ repeatedly assaulted her and raped her when they were in college, attending George Washington University. The Daily Beast confirmed various parts of Jane Doe’s story with other students and friends who attended GW at the same time. The Daily Beast also says that there have been long-simmering rumors about TJ in the stand-up comedy world, and he apparently tried to make “jokes” about violence against women, and many female comedians have refused to work with him over the years. You can read the full Daily Beast story here.

The first incident of violence occurred when Jane Doe was very, very drunk, and she has a fractured memory about that night, but she remembers TJ violently shaking her as they had sex, and she remembers him punching her in the mouth (she woke up to find she had a fractured tooth and a bloody lip the next day). He claimed she had fallen down some stairs. She says she didn’t really know what to do or how to process her fractured memories of that night. A few weeks later, they met up again at a party and they went back to her apartment, where they began to have consensual sex. Soon things became more violent – he strangled her, he sodomized her without her consent and he penetrated her with a beer bottle. She called it a “five hour ordeal” and she wasn’t drunk on that night. It was a year later before Jane Doe had the courage to go to campus police to tell them what had happened. As you can imagine, nothing happened to TJ legally or within the college.

After the Daily Beast published their story, TJ and his wife Kate issued a joint statement, because TJ is literally hiding behind the nearest woman as a way of dealing with this. Here’s their joint statement:

We met this woman over a decade ago while studying together in college, she attempted to break us up back then by plotting for over a year before making contradictory claims and accusations. She attempted to discredit both of our voices and use us against one another by trying to portray Kate to be a continuous abuse victim of T.J. (further efforts to hurt the two of us). She was asked to leave our university comedy group because of worrisome and disturbing behavior, which angered her immensely, she then became fixated on our relationship, and began telling people around campus “I’m going to destroy them” & “I’m going to ruin him.”

We are confident that a full consideration of accounts from and since that time will shed light and clarity on the true nature of not only this person’s character, but also on the real facts of the matter. (See the e-mails referenced). We stand together in stating this is nothing more than an unfortunate resurgence of her lies designed to wreak havoc on two happily married people in the public eye. She began again to circulate rumors online once our relationship became public. Sadly she is now using the current climate to bandwagon and launch these false accusations again.

It is unfortunate that she is choosing this route as it undermines the important movement to make women feel safe coming forward about legitimate claims against real known predators. We stand together and will not allow this person to take advantage of a serious movement toward gender equality by allowing her to use this moment to muddy the water with an unrelated personal agenda. We feel we all have an obligation now more than ever to prevent people from using reporters to spin lies into headlines, and focus instead on what is real. We both champion and continue to stand up for people everywhere who have truly suffered injustice seeking to have justice brought into their lives. – Kate & T.J. Miller

[From TJ’s Instagram]

Um… no. Just no. He left bruises all over Jane Doe. He punched her in the face. He raped her. This is not some Mean Girl shenanigans or some kind of weird college Fatal Attraction situation. When people show you who they are, believe them. TJ has been showing us who is for a solid year. Believe it. Believe Jane Doe too.

Oh, and in the wake of the Daily Beast story, Comedy Central canceled TJ’s new show. Film critic Danielle Solzman – who is a trans woman – also says that TJ sent her a transphobic email wherein he insulted her and dead-named her and told her that she wasn’t really trans. She has the receipts too. Adult film actress Dana DeArmond also came out in the wake of the Daily Beast story to say that TJ kissed her without her consent and harassed her when they worked together.

70th annual Cannes Film Festival - ‘Wonderstruck’ - Premiere

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

44 Responses to “T.J. Miller was accused of raping & assaulting a woman in college”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. MeowuiRose says:

    Not shocking about him at all but horrifying what she went through. That is a very oddly worded statement. What’s with all the WEs. Totally hiding behind his wife for sure.

    …what is dead naming?

    • LizLemonGotMarried says:

      Using a trans person’s former name after they have changed their name as part of their identity.

      (Any member of the community who wants to add on or tweak my wording, please weigh in-that’s just my understanding.)

    • Sam the Pink says:

      Dead naming is intentionally using a trans person’s former name. It’s considered offensive because it’s intentionally refusing to respect the trans person’s new identity.

    • Des says:

      When a transperson chooses a new name or their right name, calling them by their old name or “dead name” is deadnaming them. It’s a transphobic practice designed to remind them that you don’t agree with their correct gender – you think their birth gender was “correct”.

    • Nicole says:

      Yea I’m not shocked and the statement is just odd. He was garbage before and he’s vile now

    • Rose says:

      I just had to look up what ‘dead-naming’ means too…I’m only 36 and I swear this site uses a new term every week that i have to look up. It’s going to be so easy to lose touch when I just can’t be bothered to search terms anymore, did language always evolve as fast as it has in the last 10 years!?!

      • MeowuiRose says:

        I think it’s due to social media. We are all talking to each other all the time from all over the world.

    • Moon Beam says:

      He sent that critic a totally unhinged email telling her she was just an ugly dude and a freak masquerading for attention and that she used TJ and comedy improv world connections to get ahead and to never ever contact TJ again and that was the last time he would try and help someone.
      You want to know what prompted that? Danielle showed the email she sent TJ and apparently all she said was that TJ may want to take the word tranny out of his website description because it’s transphobic and offensive. It was like a two sentence email. TJ obviously is not put together at all. He probably got Jane Doe/Sarah kicked out of that group himself. And who goes to the trouble to set someone up by having housemates who she barely knows witness some troubling stuff on his part?? If it quacks like a duck.

    • Pumpkin (formally soup, pie) says:

      AND they put **her** name, the wife, before **his** to make their statement more “powerful”.

      I BELIEVE Jane Doe.

      I have never heard about him before.

    • Yezzz says:

      Does “deadnaming” translate to forgetting a new age name, i.e., Susan to “Rainbow”. Sometimes it’s force of habit- rather than ridicule? Serious question

  2. Sam the Pink says:

    Let’s be honest – is this really that shocking? I mean, there were men accused that surprised me. TJ Miller is not among them. It is not a far cry from serious douchebaggery to something like this, because it’s been clear he has little respect for others for a long time. I hope this at least means we never have to deal with another comedy special.

    • Ninks says:

      I saw the stories about him last night, and my first reaction was didn’t we know this already? I’m not sure where I got that idea from, because I can’t think of a thing I’ve seen him in, but I was so sure that he had already been accused to assault this year.

      • Sigh... says:

        “I was so sure that he had already been accused to assault this year.”

        He was arrested and eventually sued for slapping an Uber driver around this time last year so he clearly has a prob w/ keeping his hands (and ignorance) to himself.

    • minx says:

      No, it was not shocking at all.

  3. littlemissnaughty says:

    I have no problem believing Jane Doe. I also feel like that statement was ripped from the plot of a movie I saw recently. Who comes up with this sh*t? It’s such a tired cliché, the rejected woman who turns into a revenge-seeking psycho. I rolled my eyes every two seconds reading this.

    No, dude, we see you.

    • whatWHAT? says:

      seriously…it’s the a-hole guy who says “all my ex-gfs are CRAZY” to prevent the current girl from thinking HE’s the jerk in the relationship. it’s what so many men do to take away any credibility from the accuser…”oh she’s just an hysterical woman; you know how they are dude-bro”.

      F*CK THIS GUY.

    • tracking says:

      Yeah, he screams gaslighter.

  4. grabbyhands says:

    Not shocked at all.

    This guy is the poster boy for all the whiny, misogynist, white boy, but I’m a nice guy why don’t these whores like me assh*oles polluting the internet and the planet at large today.

  5. wood dragon says:

    Ugh. Yeah. Won’t miss this one.

  6. Squiggisbig says:

    Horrifying.

    His explanation that this woman was just obsessed with him, an unattractive, unfunny, douchebag, is laughable.

  7. Mia4s says:

    It’s been so interesting to see the pattern: One accusation is made ….”what! I would never! False! Think of the real victims! Mean girl!”…..More accusations of abuse and harassment are made…..”silence”.

    He has a supporting role in a Spielberg movie coming out next year. Uh oh. Call Christopher Plummer?

  8. Des says:

    I want to know what’s up with his wife. From the sounds of it, going by all the women on social media who’re now talking about how he hit on them, he’s been cheating on her for years. Is she a victim too or his enabler?

    • ell says:

      i think they used to be together, then they split for a long time, then got back together and married, so no cheating. i know because i remember listening to a podcast in which he was saying that, can’t even remember where.

    • whatWHAT? says:

      a little from column A, a little from column B.

      I’m sure he’s been gaslighting her…”you’re crazy…I’d never hit on her…SHE hit on ME…you’re imagining things…” etc.

      ETA: ell, that doesn’t mean he didn’t cheat on her. just means that there was a period of time that it wasn’t “officially” cheating.

  9. smcollins says:

    What a horrible, garbage person he is. I’m not sure what to say about his wife. Denial is a powerful thing. But I have to point out that it wasn’t TJ who forcefully kissed Dana DeArmond, it was the director of Skull Island (can’t think of his name). She does claim that TJ harassed her, though.

    • Div says:

      Yeah, true. I feel like it’s getting lost in the TJ Miller horror situation that Jordan Vogt-Roberts, who is being given big bucks to direct films after only one or two indies, said some misogynistic sh*t and forcefully kissed a woman against her will. I know he’s not directing the sequel to Kong but I’m pretty sure he’s signed on to another big budget project.

  10. Basi says:

    I read the headline and immediately thought “yep. Not surprised with that one”. Beyond awful.
    Of course, not making light of the horrible ordeal woman went thru. I believe her and hope she has found peace.

  11. Div says:

    I feel terrible for the victim. He had a history of violence and/or saying violent things, so I wasn’t that surprised to learn about his past.

    I’m curious to see what the studios do for his next few films ever since the Christopher Plummer re-shoot situation. I feel like most would just ignore the situation and or shelf the films, but a) it is now impossible since Ridley showed it can be done and b) too much money is invested in his upcoming films for them to be shelved. Most of them are far enough away, and his roles aren’t lead roles, that he can probably easily be replaced….but Ready Player One is coming out in four months. Is the studio really going to push a Spielberg film with him in it, especially knowing that other studios will probably replace him in their upcoming films, or not?

  12. IMO says:

    I feel awful for the victim.
    The join statement is disgusting and not a surprise at all, it is the selective support going on again after all this abuser is such a champion of the oppressed and victims in general.

  13. ell says:

    obviously i believe her, but i’m ridiculously frustrated by his wife. i understand it might not be easy to accept and that she might be in an abusive relationship with this asshole, but she needs to wake up. lots more women have come up saying how he harassed them, and i’m sure many more will speak. he’s just that guy.

    • Hmm.... says:

      Look, I don’t know what the wife’s deal is but I am getting so disheartened seeing comments that only focus on the women involved. The joint statement gives me pause and makes me uncomfortable. Maybe she enables him or maybe she, too, is a victim. I don’t really know from just reading this article.

      What I do know is that your comment was more critical of her than of him. He’s the one being accused of horrible things. Jane Doe didn’t implicate the wife in any of this.

      I vote to stop speculating about the women orbiting these awful men’s lives and get on to what really matters: their reprehensible behavior and criminal acts.

      • ell says:

        ‘What I do know is that your comment was more critical of her than of him.’

        you’re barking at the wrong tree. read better.

        i called *him* an asshole, said that ‘he’s just that guy’ i.e. a serial harasser and a rapist, conceded she might be abused by him too. BUT, i am ridiculously frustrated by the women who stick by these men. two things can be true, and yes it warrants criticism. i vote to not excuse anybody who’s complicit to the men who commit these horrible acts, how’s that?

      • Hmm.... says:

        You only referred to him as it related to your criticism of her. Your first sentence is so telling. It’s about the wife, even if you acknowledge he’s an “asshole” and “just that guy [who has many woman coming forward now and likely in the future]”.

        I take issue with the weight you threw her way. You don’t even know if she’s complicit or not. This article is about HIM. How about you save your outrage for the man and reserve your judgment of the wife until such a time as there’s compelling indicators that she knew about this at all?

  14. Samantha says:

    The approach to denying sexual assault allegations have changed. It’s “I/we support all women but THIS woman is lying & ruining it for everyone” or “Every accusation is believed, this is a witch-hunt folks!”.
    Anyway, the accusations, like all the other ones coming out with metoo, seem very credible.
    The “false” accusations, despite what people tend to say, very very rarely are revenge scenarios. They’re usually cases of needing an alibi or due to mental illness.

    • ell says:

      what gets to me is when people use the ‘they’re lying to get attention’ excuse to justify why they don’t believe the accusers. who wants this sort of attention?? in miller’s case it’s even more ridiculous because he’s saying all of this is done over a long lasting revenge to separate him from his one true love. it’s pathetic.

  15. Betsy says:

    I’ve never heard of him, but looking at him…. yeah, he looks like trash.

  16. Crystal says:

    Thank you so much for covering this!

    My thoughts are much the same as yesterday in that he is disgusting and I am not shocked.

  17. Pinetree13 says:

    The full article is horrifying. The fact that she lost her virginity to him is also so sad and disturbing.

  18. Jordan says:

    Comedy Central is still airing marathons of that 70s show. Eff them all.

  19. Electric Tuba says:

    He needs to be kept away from the public. I’m talking a psychiatric facility that is guarded. After piecing together these claims against him and things he has admitted doing himself coupled with admitted medical history and the ongoing use of mind/ reality altering party drugs there really is a worry that he could take a life as well as his own.

    He’s out there talking about it all, telling us he’s nuts and people were just like, “yeah funny party on man derp derp.” Toxic and dangerous man.

  20. Bread and Circuses says:

    I’ll bet that joint statement was only written by one person, and that he didn’t ask so much as tell his wife they were putting it out “jointly”.