Comments on: Jackson’s ex wife Debbie Rowe: he’s not the kids’ father (update: not true)

By: Jermaine

Jermaine — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:43:04 +0000

R.I.P Michael See you in the next life

By: cathy

cathy — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:58:31 +0000

i think that its sad the kids should say who they want to be raised by and i hope that debbie isnt the one they pick she not a mother and they dont know her really let someone that loves the kids take the kids

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: FunBuffy

FunBuffy — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:07:02 +0000

LEAVE THEM ALONE!!
After seeing the kids at the memorial, those children have bonded with their ‘Jackson’ family.
YOU Debbi, will only become a greedy person to step in and wreck that bond. Go write a book, Go back to your home. If those kids want to know about you, let them come to you. STOP spending their money in court cases. Because that is what you are really hurting. Taking ‘money’ to go away, is taking it from the kids now..
You need to get a life!!!!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: punkies

punkies — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 06:23:29 +0000

let the man rest in peace people we all get what we deserve!!!!!!!!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: gg

gg — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:52:37 +0000

To the commenters slamming Debbie Rowe due to tabloid BS:

** People please note that this is a phony interview. **

Getting your “facts” from The Enquirer or The Sun or News Of The World is foolhardy, to say the least.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: princess pee

princess pee — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:46:47 +0000

@ tamara – hee hee. Deepak Chopra doesn’t need MJ to get his “15 minutes” or money. He is really quite famous (and wealthy) already.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: tamara

tamara — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:06:27 +0000

“Dr. Chopra” was not Michael’s friend. He simply wants 15 minutes of fame and money!!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: bros

bros — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:56:37 +0000

deepak chopra, a very good friend of jackson’s came right out and said on MSNBC (interview with keith olberman) that these children do not share any DNA relationship with MJ. this doesnt mean he was not their father. is there some debate over this? this seems like a no brainer to me.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: JustV

JustV — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:46:21 +0000

No one in their right mind believed that MJ was the biological father to his children.

I didn’t see MJ’s actions to his body and his desire not to have any biological input into his ‘offspring’ as his rejection of the beauty of ‘blackness’, but rather a complete rejection of the epitomy of his tormentor, Joe Jackson. MJ mutilated his body, his facial features, his skin to remove all traces of Papa Joe. MJ didn’t have vitilago, he had a desire for different skin. I think to possibly raise offspring that could have any of Joe’s features was a risk he chose not to take. So much of MJ’s existence seems to have been to get as far away, physically, emotionally, genetically, to what his father is.

Even if this interview with Ms. Rowe is fake, I still don’t think she should have access to children that she has essentially abandoned for over a decade.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Wow

Wow — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:16:24 +0000

@ “Okay” – thanks for the clarity. I hadn’t seen your post before posting.

Report this comment as spam or abuse