Comments on: Joan Jett is so hardcore she made Kristen Stewart cry

By: Carbel

Carbel — Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:49:32 +0000

i´m all ready see the film, and it´s very good, i like so mucho…i love the look of Kristen and Dakota,and i think that Kate Moennig can make this rol of Joan Jett too…well i know is some old.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: ShutUp

ShutUp — Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:43:15 +0000

I don’t care how great an actress Kristen Stewart is or isn’t; she’s nowhere near badass enough to play Joan Jett! If she does pull it off, she damn better win some sort of award since the girl couldn’t be any more opposite of the Queen of Badass-Rockery – JOAN JETT!!!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: BlueSkies

BlueSkies — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:52:34 +0000

Hieronymus, you go!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: CaptainPortal.COM

CaptainPortal.COM — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:31:47 +0000

LOOKS GOOD !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Tash

Tash — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:52:22 +0000

I’m a twihard but she’s an ACTRESS. It would be weird and pathetic if all she could do was Twilight. I think she’ll rock as Joan as long as she really commits. I wasn’t upset about the hair or anything. People who get upset about her playing other roles are kinda retarded.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: mercy

mercy — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:01:00 +0000

“Rabidly defend her”, wow, you DO have issues. Your problem, not mine.
And Ned, you said you saw 2 movies with K.S. and now she´s “modeling” in all other movies she was in according to you even if you did not see them.
Way to go guys. Still shows more about you and not her and not in a good way.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Hieronymus Grex

Hieronymus Grex — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:32:52 +0000

While everyone is entitled to like whomever you choose some of these comments concerning her abilities as an actress only imply that you have seen none of her movies or only twilight and that explains a lot about you.

Yes, it explains that people leap to the most inaccurate conclusions when their personal sacred cow is brought to question. Her acting as I said before is mediocre and she’s the flavor of the month thanks to Twilight and that’s all there is to it. There’s a perception based on the box office receipts from that movie that an audience is willing to pay to see her again, and it will bite the decision makers in the @ss sooner or later and by then you’ll have another total stranger hand-picked to be your hero and will rabidly defend her or him as well.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Hieronymus Grex

Hieronymus Grex — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:21:10 +0000

The idea that they believed this wisp of a child is somehow able to embody the ballsiest woman in rock music, only confirms my belief that music and film has become just another trade-able commodity to be bought and sold at will and that the actual art of it has long been forgotten. They aren’t interested in presenting compelling riveting story of Joan’s struggle up from nothing in seedy dives and biker bars, just hopping on the Kristen Stewart bandwagon before her mediocrity makes her unmarketable.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Ned

Ned — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:59:57 +0000

I saw Adventureland and like I said, it was an ensemble work, good script and she wasn’t the one who carried the movie.

She did her same modeling of the same old “attitude” expression which was right for her part, and that’s about it.

She did the same “modeling” in other movies and when she gives inetrviews.
I suspect that is all she has, and that is not acting.

“Ready to do important things” means she might be able to.
I think that is all she can do, and though it’s not really acting, I do think you can use her in those kinds of settings (a supporting part, with an adolescent attitude who doesn’t need to do much beyond “model” the same thing she did in Adventureland).

I do think she is pretty and I think there is always room for pretty girls who “model”, if others carry the film and the script is good.

They don’t all need to be actors and many of today’s “actresses” (Alba, Biel and the list goes on) can’t act at all, and there is room for them.
Krister just joins the group of non actors, which is fine, but don’t expect much more.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: mercy

mercy — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:02:00 +0000

That is o-tone Roger Ebert: “What surprised me was how much I admired Kristen Stewart, who in “Twilight,” was playing below her grade level. Here is an actress ready to do important things. Together, and with the others, they make “Adventureland” more real and more touching than it may sound.”

But surely you guys know better than him. While everyone is entitled to like whomever you choose some of these comments concerning her abilities as an actress only imply that you have seen none of her movies or only twilight and that explains a lot about you. Same goes for judging her by pics. Says more about some here than about Kristen Stewart when they assume her being smug or entitled or, happened before, using drugs.

Report this comment as spam or abuse