Comments on: Michael Jackson’s will: Diana Ross next in line after Katherine for custody

By: graham

graham — Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:35:28 +0000

mj,trusted miss ross,she was there from the beginning,michael even lived with her for a while,she is an incredibly wealthy lady who has been a superstar for 50 years,his kids would be well protected by her and not exploited,she has been a fabulous mother to her own five succsesful children,and for the sad people who say miss ross is a bad choice as guardien well i suppose you losers are perfect,when miss ross was having problems she was going through a painful period in her life,divorce from a husband she still loved,viva miss ross a great and classy lady and a true living legend.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: dark

dark — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:09:13 +0000

Wooowww! It really opened my eyes. What a family, i must say!!!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Cheyenne

Cheyenne — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:34:08 +0000

I was wondering why Michael would name Diana Ross as his children’s guardian after Katherine Jackson, instead of one of his siblings, but after reading the article below, it looks as if Michael not only hated Joe Jackson, he hated most of his siblings as well. Check out the link below (it may take a while to load). It’s a real eye-opener.

http://www.nypost.com/php/pfriendly/print.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nypost.com%2Fseven%2F03232008%2Fnews%2Fnationalnews%2Fjacko_clan_in_a_deep_funk_103188.htm

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: ohKaiser

ohKaiser — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:59:18 +0000

“Is it a “testament to talent”? Really? I can’t tell, because reading any story about Michael Jackson makes me a little sick to my stomach. Yes, when I was little I had Thriller, and I danced to it constantly. I knew all the words to all the songs. That was back when Michael was a musical genius, but should that genius allow him to get away with doing any depraved thing he wants? Yes, he made some great albums, but I wouldn’t want to hear any of it today. Am I the only one?”
by Kaiser

You Hypocrite, please stop posting anything related to MJ, aren’t you sick to your stomach?
When he’s alive you found him guilty all by yourself. Now he’s dead, and you go all RIPing?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: nnn

nnn — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:11:50 +0000

I don’t know why people think Debbie Rowe should have custody. She got a big settlement to stay out of their lives. That says to me that she doesn’t want these kids. I don’t think she’s seen them or had contact with Michael since the divorce.

————————————-
Maybe because if she is to be blame for that settlement, Michael is equally responsible for offering that agreement for her to walk out. No woman who wants to abandon her kids will ask money for it, she will just go. If she did, then she was paid to do it and Michael shared that responsability which for me doesn’t qualifies him as the better parent when he traded the best interest of his children which would involved guaranteeing they stay in contact with their mum and share joint custody.

She isn’t a mother who has just decided to walk out one day, she is a mum who has been bribed to move out the house and to relinquish her rights to Michael Jackson so that the he could raise the children alone in his own terms.

In 2005, she went to the Court to get her rights back and was told that the agreement she signed was quida illegal and not validated by a Court, since it’s a Court that decides and motivateS the reason why you should be stripped of your parental rights. The Court said that her rights were safe and that she was still the legal mother of those children. Rumors are that the Jacksons as of three days ago said that they won’t oppose her to see her children as she is their mother…they know better why they CAN’T oppose that eventhough they did it in 2005 when she tried to get back the joint custody.

My take is if someone as bizarre as Michael Jackson who was high on drugs (he even supposedly fell in a coma in front of his own son) could raise those children in a bizarre way where they could not go outside without a mask,where they could stumble in any drug, where they didn’t got schooled, how come their own mother who raised them during the first three years after being bribed to back off and be cut out of their life, who tried to get her rights back and who except that agreement didn’t demonstrated any insane behaviour even today, why should she be automatically dismissed as a guardian (evben partially)when everyone thought that someone as unstable as Michael could have the exclusive right of raising them ?

Rowe seems stable and more normal emotionally than he was. Rowe is also beleived to share a bio lineage, is younger than the supposed guardian, has family who could even help raising their siblings. And last, Rowe is still the legal direct parent still alive. She has rights as their legal mother and should at least be offered the option to perform her rights as amum even residually if she ask for it. Those children would probably be raised with more ‘normalcy’ with her anyway.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Rosanna

Rosanna — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:26:34 +0000

Now, the man wasn’t *that* far out! Diana Ross is a great person, and for sure a better parent than one who gave those kids away without being in need of doing so, or too young and naive to raise them.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: orion70

orion70 — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:16:40 +0000

I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if someone wasn’t able to contest this will on the basis of sanity.

re: Debbie, to me it seems obvious that she was just a womb-for-hire

It does strike me as odd that none of the siblings were identified, as I thought he and Janet were close.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: kris

kris — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:43:29 +0000

let the jolie pitts be the guardian pls!hehe

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: jann

jann — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:47:40 +0000

Diana is not fit for those children, she is so mean,with emotional problems as stated above, also, Debbie? really? on CNN yesterday, it was reported that she tried to sale those children already, the Jackson adult children, with the exception of la toya all have their own families and are doing really great with stable homes and money of their own, none of the brothers and their children ever been in trouble with the law and like Joe said the other day, they have kids to play with, Joe have lived in Vegas for years and CNN reported he has mellowed and he and Michael had a great relationship the past few years.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Amy

Amy — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:32:19 +0000

Report this comment as spam or abuse