Comments on: Debbie Rowe will seek custody; file restraining order against Joe Jackson

By: anke goehring

anke goehring — Sat, 03 Sep 2011 07:04:18 +0000

These kids are not poor,they are under good care and each owes already more than 100 million dollars

By: Deborah

Deborah — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:00:27 +0000

I have not read all the comments on this website but I will say for myself that Debbie Rowe is a golddigger. If,god forbid she should get these children I wonder how quickly she will be willing to sell them off to the highest bidder as she sold them to Michael? she makes me ill.Anyone who can blow through all the money she made and claim to be broke,is not responsible enough to raise these precious children. She blew all her money on animals and should she get anymore she will do the same.Raising dogs and horses is not the same as raising children. If she really loved these kids she would not even begin to think of seperating them at such a vulnerable time. They belong together with Michaels family who loves them dearly and is obvious they love them back. This crap with Joe Jackson getting his hands on them to make them the next Jackson sensation is bullhockey. There is no way the family would ever consider that,besides they do not live together,he lives in Vegas and Katherine lives in California and I believe they will be very safe with her.I hope if this goes down to a Judge decision,he will think of the good of the children. There are alot of biological mothers who are alive and not raising their kids for one reason or another.Has it even been established without a doubt that she is bio mom?I haven’t heard or seen definite proof.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Arlene

Arlene — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:13:10 +0000

DEBBIE ROWE IS THE MOTHER, GIVE HER HER CHILDREN BACK, SO THEY CAN GROW UP NORMAL. EVERYONE SAYS ITS ABOUT MONEY, BUT REMEMBER SHE WAS A “SURRAGATE” AND DO YOU THINK THAT SARAH JESSICA PARKERS KIDS ARE ANY DIFFERENT? SHE PAID A SURAGATE TO CARRY HER BABIES. WHY IS DEBBIE ROWE SO DIFFERENT? SHE WAS MARRIED TO MICHAEL, AND IS THE ONLY ONE THAT SHOULD GET THE CHILDREN, GO DEBBIE GO. IGNORE ALL THOSE THAT SAY YOUR IN IT FOR THE MONEY. SJP BOUGHT HER TWINS FOR $150.000.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Kim

Kim — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:17:39 +0000

Here’s a question I’d like to hear Debbie answer: Would you take the children WITHOUT the money?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Tosha

Tosha — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:01:39 +0000

The children can say where they will like to be raised and I dont think that it will be “Desperate Rowe”.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Tosha

Tosha — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:59:41 +0000

She needs to refund that payment that she received to the estate.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: snorkey

snorkey — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:36:09 +0000

These kids are white kids and i doubt that they have been around many black kids, whatever one says, there is a difference. Yes, If those kids spent alot of time w/ their cousins, it would be a different matter. I would bet all I have that none of them even know any of Michael’s family. besides those cousins are much older than Michaels kids, so if they go w/ the jacksons, they would be 3 white kids together and the blacks would be as strangers. no not good, not good at all. I say give them to that monster debbie, at least she is the mother and white. I believe children of both colors should be raised together but not in this situation. Their ages do not coincide and the3 new ones would be odd man out.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: gg

gg — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:39:46 +0000

Debbie is the mom. They have the same features as she. LOOK AT THE CHIN. They will do the DNA test and everyone will see she’s their bio mom.

Also, I can’t say this enough: MONEY = absolute power. Debbie was shut out and I believe she’s just been waiting for a way to get through the MJ Shutout Program. I remember when she wanted more visitation – the suit mysteriously dissolved after she was threatened by MJ’s legal team.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: PJ

PJ — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:29:31 +0000

Joint custody of Debbie’s two kids could be a real possibility.

There are tough choices here: If Debbie gets her two kids, the three siblings will be split up because she has no legal claim to Blanket whatsoever.

If Grandma Jackson gets all 3 kids, she might die before they reach the legal age of 18. However, there are strong arguments for her retaining custody since the kids have a close relationship with her, the custodial parent (MJ) named her as the guardian, and she very well might live till all three kids are 18.

I’m betting Mrs. Jackson will get full custody of Blanket, and joint custody could be a compromise position for the other two, since it would allow the three siblings to live together half the time.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Karen

Karen — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:36:45 +0000

Michael would roll over in his grave if his father got the kids.

Are the kids really biologically Michaels though? It doesn’t look like they have a shred of black in them. They don’t look like Debbie either.

Why should she get the kids? She wanted nothing to do with them after they were born. She’s not their mom.

Debbie will be a stranger to the kids. Let the kids live with someone they know. They are traumatized enough with their dad’s death.

I just hope the best for those kids.

Report this comment as spam or abuse