Comments on: Enquirer: Morgan Freeman set to marry 27-year-old step-granddaughter

By: chip monk

chip monk — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:03:03 +0000

M-I-S-S-I-S-S-I-P-P-I

By: jean

jean — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:31:45 +0000

I blame his wife as much as I blame him because she knew about it all along and stayed with him and covered it up for the money. If he makes another movie and I want to go see it I will.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Parker

Parker — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 02:15:55 +0000

I met them many years ago when He was 52 years old and she was 7 years old. They were at the beach. His wife was there too. They told me they were raising HIS daughter’s child because his daughter had problems and couldn’t properly care for the child. I played with the little girl – jumping in the waves. I thought they looked like caring grandparents. His daughter (adopted) must be horrified that he molested her child after she trusted him to raise her. If this is true, it is beyond disgusting.
And STOP blaming the child; you have no idea the kind of brainwashing that takes place in these incestuous situations and those of you who are blaming the child, sound like idiots!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Mary Jane

Mary Jane — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:15:24 +0000

Electric Company Reunion Skit Part 1:

(Closeup of Val and Morgan in silhouette focusing on tehir mouths…)

Val: yuck…
Morgan: …oh?
Both: Yucko!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Pott54

Pott54 — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:48:35 +0000

THE OLD MAN HAS DEEP POCKETS ($$$$$).

The Enquirer better PRAY that this ugly mess is true…because if it isn’t–MORGAN FREEMAN won’t only own blues clubs and real estate–HE’S GOING TO OWN THE ENQUIRER! If this isn’t true, he owes it to his granddaughter to SUE their a$$es off–not remain SILENT. IF HE DID THIS…UGH! That explains those “creepy” pictures of him and that 25-year old ugly model Lara Dern (I think that’s her name) in Vogue Magazine. UGH!

ALSO, even though the report of his affair with Mary Joyce Hays was true, the Enquirer claimed they would be married by the end of 2008 or early 2009. No marriage because ACTUALLY, by the time the Enquirer got a hold of those pictures, THAT AFFAIR WAS ALREADY OVER. Those pictures were originally posted on some obscure, home-made web page long before the Enquirer got a hold of them. They then showed up in the Daily News in the UK. Then they claimed SHE dumped HIM because “he didn’t love her anymore and was pushing her away.” Then they came back and claimed SHE found out about E’Dena and dumped him. Go figure.

The Enquirer gets it right–but they are prone to embellish the facts as well. They’re the best when it comes to WHERE THERE’S SMOKE, THERE’S FIRE!

Let’s hope they’re wrong in this case or MORGAN FREEMAN’S CAREER IS GONE WITH THE WIND.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: j. ferber

j. ferber — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:04:23 +0000

The Enquirer has turned out to be right on so many stories, so I don’t think their name alone suggests a false story. They know how to dig up the dirt, not too nicely, of course, but they get the scoop.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Jazz

Jazz — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:53:00 +0000

This is so many shades of wrong!!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: paranel

paranel — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:27:47 +0000

I find this news disturbing. How could they do this ? The girl is as disgusting as Morgan.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Jaycee

Jaycee — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:59:48 +0000

I’m not sure if this is true about Morgan or not, but they ARE holding hands in the photo, which is kind of creepy in itself. I can see holding a toddler’s hand, but really, do you hold hands in public with a 27-year-old woman if nothing is going on? I really don’t want it to be true…. I think about half the movies I own have Morgan Freeman in them….but nothing surprises me anymore. Sad, sad, sad.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Mimi

Mimi — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:07:16 +0000

You people are really discussing a information generated by THE ENGUIRER? Really? Even if the PR has not answered it is no reason to believe. Besides if the actors had to answer all the stories that the tabloids invent them would make a speech denial every week with another actors probably 1 per day. Not to mention that some stories are so absurd that the actors / actresses often Simply ignore those stories and that is what we should do. You guys go on a TABLOID that word is equal to FALSE STORIES AND SOURCE INVENTIVENESS. What you say will be correct when a PROOF that the story is true COME OUT. Meanwhile, maybe we should give him the benefit of the doubt and change the comments. AND until we prove otherwise He IS A GOOD PERSON AND EXCELLENT ACTOR

Report this comment as spam or abuse