Sep 10
'09
Sex and the City fashion: totally ’80s

fp_3580177_sex_and_the_city_scp_090909

In case you hadn’t heard, the Sex and the City movie is filming all over the place. Can’t you just hear Sarah Jessica Parker’s girlish scream and she runs in her four-inch Monolos? Oh, yes. And for this film, no one seems to be concerned about spoilers are revealing whatever meager plotlines or anything like that. Every time I see a picture from the set (“the set” = Manhattan), I just think “Thank God I’m not going to have to pay to see this movie.”

Most of these pictures have been all over the place, and many of you have probably seen them, but here they are all in one place! It seems we’re going to be treated to some kind of Sex and the City: Totally ‘80s flashback sequence. I’ve said it before, but my favorite has always been Miranda. I’m getting a kick out of her ‘80s blowout, shoulder pads and Working Girl gear. And is that a bowl cut I spy? She looks amazing, but oh, no. Honey, just no. Also – is it weird that 1980s Charlotte (Kristen Davis) does not look any different? Her kind of prim-and-proper yuppie style really doesn’t look weird – she ends up looking classic.

I could do without Sarah Jessica Parker’s Madonna-esque girdle-as-outerwear look, but I’m kind of digging the flash of flannel. It’s like Carrie Bradshaw knew grunge was coming, and she wanted to give Seattle (the other “sexy city”) a shout-out. Carrie is such a trendsetter.

Of course, the best ‘80s transformation goes to Kim Cattrall. I’m not even sure what this look is. Debbie Harry meets Joey Ramone meets Vivenne Westwood? Is it supposed to be punk? Is it supposed to be glam? Is it supposed to be this hideous? Believe it or not, I remember parts of the 1980s – my age was in the single digits, but I don’t remember women’s fashion being this horrible. Where’s the old-school Gianni Versace? Where are the parachute pants? Can a girl get some jelly bracelets?

Here are the girls filming in Manhattan yesterday. Images thanks to WENN.com and Fame Pictures .

Written by Kaiser

Share

Posted in Cynthia Nixon, Fashion, Kim Cattrall, Kristin Davis, Sarah Jessica Parker, Sex and the City


- TV Shows that outstayed their welcome [Pajiba]
- Goopy and Cameron Diaz went to a Coldplay concert [Lainey Gossip]
- The bacon milkshake! [D-Listed]
- Ashanti looks... good? [Go Fug Yourself]
- 20 great songs under 2 minutes [Fark]
- Snooki and J-Woww on notice [IDLYITW]
- Jennifer Aniston through the years [Popsugar]
- Kirsten Dunst looks so pretty here [Evil Beet]
- Mila Kunis without makeup [Celebslam]
- The awful cover letter all of Wall St. is mocking [Gawker]

23 Responses to “Sex and the City fashion: totally ’80s”

  1. JayBird says:

    I just have to say I adore the flounce of the bowl cut.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  2. Praise St. Angie! says:

    Tretorns, Lily skirt and Bermuda bag?

    oh my, did she raid my box of old clothes in the attic?!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  3. Diane says:

    I’m looking forward to meeting my g/f’s sharing cosmos and watching a total fluff film.

    (Yes, I am actually that shallow = )

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  4. TaylorB says:

    Miranda looks awesome. From the suit w/Reeboks, to the awful hairdo… Love it.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  5. lola says:

    Ok for 80s Samantha could they have not just referenced, um, KIM CATTRELL???? She was a porkies icon. And big trouble little china. And police academy. Surely she has some fashionable pap pics from the era instead of that dreadful get up. she looks like a cartoon.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  6. Mairead says:

    lola – I so totally agree. She was stunning and stylish in the 80s. Not this mess of a hair rock reject.

    I know they’re going for the early 80s, but CHRIST!!!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  7. danielle says:

    Um…not to be mean…but what are they doing to their faces to make them look the right age?

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  8. Goddess711 says:

    Y’gotta be kidding me. This looks like an 80′s theme party at a retirement home! WTF is this?
    SJP as Madonna looks like an old Madonna before Madonna started looking like the leathered veiny ancient bag that she looks like now.
    I already don’t want to see this sh**, the writers are idiots. The first movie sucked, these a**holes are completely taking the greatness out of the series.
    DEPRESSING SH** MAN!!!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  9. Polkasox says:

    That hair/makeup/bow makes SJP look ooooooold.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  10. Eileen Yover says:

    Ugh Kim Catrall looks OLDER than she normally does! Bring back Mannequin! Booyah!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  11. April says:

    God almighty that is all just an eyesore.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  12. orion70 says:

    I’m surprised they didn’t go a little more Vivienne Westwood’s “new romantic” with Samantha or something. There was one scene in the 1st movie where Samantha is wearing that heavy shoulder-padded white dress with dolman sleeves and blunt bang wig (I think)…that seems more on the mark for her. The big hair is fine.

    I remember some girls emulating Madonna while wearing that get-up Carrie has on..but not grown women. There were craploads of quirky “colorful” styles that seem to be more fitting to Carrie’s personality.

    I think it would have been fun to see Miranda with longer hair, more contrary to what she has now. Like along the lines of Melanie Griffith in Working Girl. I also think it would have been more fun to see Charlotte in a bit of a role reversal, before she found her “classic”-ness.

    Not everything about the 80′s was hideous….otherwise we wouldn’t be seeing a resurgence of leggings, jelly shoes, peter-pan boots, and off the shoulder T’s.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  13. Tia C says:

    This movie looks like it’s going to be a total suckfest. Why are they dressed in horrid 80s clothes but they still look like they’re pushing 50? Couldn’t they have at least attempted some better makeup to try to de-age them? It just looks totally stupid. I won’t be paying to see it. The first movie sucked anyway. These films are doing a disservice to the show.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  14. moo says:

    A group of ugly OLD bitches trying to make us all believe it was almost 30 years ago? Huh??? Oh, this movie will be reallllly bad.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  15. Just a Poster says:

    Kristen looks wonderful! Does that woman ever age?

    And what on earth did they to to Kim??

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  16. crazytalk says:

    I agree, it’s ridiculous that they are trying to have a flashback to almost 30 years ago with their 50 year-old faces? It’s like they’re all just laughing at the audience for buying this crap. Bad enough the plot of the last movie was complete nonsense, they’re going to have a flashback to the 80s in this one?! Stupid. Just plain stupid.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  17. Andrea says:

    there are no words for the level of seething hatred i feel for all things SATC. so many levels. so incredibly sexist. i cannot believe they are making ANOTHER movie. god, let this crapfest die already. INCREDIBLY SEXIST.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  18. Aviatrix says:

    Oh my! Wow, I agree with the above posters on how bad the makeup looks. Fashion choices could be less retarded and honestly how stupid do the writers think we are? Carrie is supposed to be what 43 and I was born in 1983 so we’re supposed to believe this old hag is 17 at the youngest? B*tch please.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  19. kimberly says:

    ya someone should tell them the 80′s part II is over . . .

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  20. danielle says:

    all i have to say is
    http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2160/1702016065_189ccc8faa.jpg?v=0

    kim cattrall was stunningly beautiful. these “80s” pictures remind me of the sad examples of age-inappropriateness that I see on “What Not to Wear.” i feel so bad for her. :(

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  21. Stephie says:

    Heh, I am SO glad we’re not in the 80′s anymore. This is going to be fun. They all look great, funny, but great. Bring on the 70′s and 90′s too. Why not?

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  22. TaylorB says:

    Just a Poster,

    I am with you on Kristin Davis, the woman seems to be ageless. No offense to the others but they look way too long in the tooth to pull of an 80′s flashback gracefully.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  23. 4Real says:

    They all look ridiculous. Happy Halloween!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

Leave a Reply

Celebitchy aims to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy

Use the "Report this comment as spam or abuse" link to ask the moderators to delete a comment if it's offensive. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please e-mail cbcomments at gmail.com to get it retrieved.

Get an icon next to your name by signing up for a free Gravatar

 
 
 
Legal Disclaimer| Privacy Policy | Comment Policy