Comments on: Jude Law wasn’t around for birth of his fourth child, has no plans to visit

By: 4Real

4Real — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:31:35 +0000

Just another pseudo-straight actor.

By: j. ferber

j. ferber — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 21:40:54 +0000

Yes, Lantana, Jude always does look guilty of something. I’ve seen the pic of him and his infamous, shameless penis, and the,um, modesty of his equipment was underwhelming. Perhaps his sluttiness is compensation for his humble appendage? Dude isn’t aging well, either.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Patrice

Patrice — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:00:44 +0000

“Besides financial support, he’s not involved.”

What? I’m so sick of hearing bullsh@t lines like this, it was the same with Bridget Moynahan: HOW “INVOLVED” DO YOU WANT A MAN (WHO ISN’T EVEN WITH THE MOTHER) TO BE BEFORE THE KID COMES OUT OF HER BELLY!!?? What exactly is he supposed to be doing while the child is still in utero? On another note, so what if he wasn’t there for the birth.It isn’t ideal for the future telling of the story to the kid, but lot’s of Dads aren’t(for whatever reason). Besides he was working on his play, which, he’s going to need to make a whole lot more of if he’s going to meet the demands of this wretched gold digger for the next 18 years.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Pole

Pole — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:38:46 +0000

@Miranda: I reckon if the genders were reversed Ms. (Mr.?) Burke would be charged with some sort of assult. Now she’s just a victim of an evil man [/sarcasm] Seriously – if he was ill what was she thinking? If he was so drunk that he couldn’t remember her? Me thinks she’s hardly an innocent victim of anything but her own stupidity. It takes two to tango.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Miranda

Miranda — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:12:54 +0000

Did one of Jude’s friends say that he was so ill at the time he could barely remember this woman – if the genders were reversed, wouldn’t that be sexual assault? Anyhoo, Jude has a habit of riding bareback with his flings – the infamous nanny stated that he didn’t use condoms with her, so I doubt Ms. Burke needed to prick any holes. Still, that kid is screwed – knowing you exist solely so that your mom can collect a check every month!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Sigh.

Sigh. — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:38:44 +0000

Can she sell pics of the baby without Law’s permission? I realize they are not married, but doesn’t he still have some say, deserved or not, in the selling of his child’s image?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Andrea

Andrea — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:11:05 +0000

And her dumb family had the nerve to say that she was innocent. She just another gold-digging sl-t. And of course Jude is a man whore, but he doesn’t have to be in the child’s life if he doesn’t want to. If I were him I’d keep away from her family too. They are bonkers.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: flourpot

flourpot — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:11:07 +0000

agree w/Firestarter. again. as usual. I can totally picture the mother of that baby nomming on his condom to make sure it would leak. Granted, yes, I’m giving Jude bringing a condom the benefit of doubt. Still. Scummy all around.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Lantana

Lantana — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:09:11 +0000

I was the result of an unwanted pregnancy, a sperm donor that was already married with 4 kids of “his” own, and he never tried to do anything to get in touch with me. I looked him up when I was 19 because I thought maybe he just didn’t know I existed. He accused me of trying to extort money from him (NOT – I never even thought of a money issue as I wasn’t in need at all and it shocked me when he implied it), he said he didn’t owe me “one dime” and got his wife on the phone to prove he told her about me so I couldn’t “blackmail” him. It was a humiliating experience and I’ve never contacted him since. And this man is a pharmacist – meaning he can’t be stupid, but he is STUPID if you get what I mean. So, yeah, kids are born into all sorts of circumstances in this world, but they grow up with so much more information now than we ever did (I’m in my 40′s). I think what would traumatize us may roll off their backs. Not saying that’s a good thing.