Levin: Duchess Meghan would refuse to stay with Prince Charles, apparently

Prince Charles clearly leaked a story about how he, a “doting grandfather,” invited the Sussex family to stay with him if and when they travel to the UK this spring. Charles wants it both ways, he wants to blame Harry for the toxic father-son dynamic, and Charles wants credit for extending the olive branch to his “wayward” son. I’m absolutely positive that Prince Harry has read this play and seen variations of it a million times before. Harry knows when he’s being used as a prop in his father’s PR. That being said, Harry and Meghan haven’t confirmed either way if they’re actually going to try to visit the UK this spring, so all of the stories about “where will they stay” and “they would never stay with Charles” is just keen busywork for the royal reporters, none of whom have access to H&M. Speaking of someone with no access, Angela Levin has some thoughts about this story.

Meghan Markle is unlikely to stay with Prince Charles in the UK as it will be “awkward” following the family’s very public row, an expert has said. The Prince of Wales reportedly invited the Sussexes to stay with him when they are next in the UK and has told Prince Harry he’d love to see his grandchildren.

But royal biographer Angela Levin believes the likelihood of Meghan and Harry accepting such an invitation is slim – as it would be too awkward. The royal author told the Sun Online: “Of course when you are married your partner has a say in it all and I don’t believe Meghan ever wants to come back here. She would find it very difficult to stay with Prince Charles and the duchess [of Cornwall] because I think she would be quite awkward about it all.”

Meghan was previously said to have shared a “close bond” with her father-in-law, who walked her down the aisle on her and Harry’s wedding day. The two are even said to have bonded over their shared interest for art, culture and history.

Angela Levin explained: “I think Prince Charles loves Harry and he’s been devastated by his behaviour – he’s making a hugely important offer, you’d think he could feel resentful but hes not going down that route. He’s trying to encourage Harry into the royal fold not necessarily into the Royal Family but into being good friends. I think Charles is very brave, very honourable and it should really be Harry that apologies to him and try to get back in his good books but I think this looks as though it’s the other way round. He could make a very nice weekend for them and [Harry and Meghan] could still find criticisms there.”

[From The Sun]

So Levin has created a little fictional world where Meghan would refuse to stay with Charles because of the awkwardness (??) and Harry would refuse to apologize to his father for… something, and basically Meghan isn’t even welcome in the UK anymore for reasons! As I said, it’s just busywork and treading water for royal commentators. They don’t even mind that they lost access, because they know that Charles, William, Kate and the Middletons will talk to them endlessly about the Sussexes.

Also: between Harry and Meghan, Meg is the more conciliatory one, mark my words. She was always the one who wanted to compromise, to make some kind of peace. Levin is trying to say “well, Meghan would refuse to come and Harry will follow her lead!” No, that’s not the dynamic. Meghan is like “well, maybe it would be nice to visit” and Harry is like “I WILL BURN THIS PALACE DOWN.”

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid, WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

85 Responses to “Levin: Duchess Meghan would refuse to stay with Prince Charles, apparently”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. PaulaH says:

    Royal Reporters are CLUELESS.

    • vs says:

      H said, they don’t report, they create the news! they keep telling us they will stop reporting on H&M because they are irrelevant yet they can’t stop talking about them!
      This woman is trash and the Bot Sentinel report proves how she amplifies hate accounts

      How can Charles work with such a person? Andy is a nonce but he is a much better father to his daughters than Charles could ever dream to be!

      Diana was so right about this man!

    • ArtHistorian says:

      Angela Levin interacts with several of the crazy hate-accounts on Twitter – so she’s deep into the bizarro-verse that these derangers has created. C. Bouzy’s reports on the internet hate-campaign against Meghan and Harry has emphasized that of all the RR’s Levin is consistently interacting with and amplifying single-purpose hate accounts to the point where she’s presented at least on of their fantasies on television.

      • Guest says:

        Apparently, People magazine has removed the article about the BotSentinal report from its website and the haters are crowing about getting it removed. They’re swarming and harassing any journalist who wrote about the report to silence them.

      • Tessa says:

        I stopped buying People.

      • Jais says:

        That’s crazy if they deleted that article. I’m still able to get it on my apple news feed but another link said page not found.

      • Bren says:

        The Bot Sentinal report made the rounds in the mainstream media over the last few days and People deleting the story won’t change that fact. I wonder who made the request for the article to be removed and why. I’m curious to see if other articles written about the report will be pulled down as well. If it happens again, hmm.

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        The British editor-in-chief of People Magazine, Dan Wakeford, used to work for one of Murdoch’s subsidiaries. Pulling the story isn’t a good look for them. Wonder if they were Amy Robached.

        Didn’t one of the 3 named put out a tweet thanking Christoper Bouzy for the free advertising yesterday? Is the argument now that they don’t like stuff put out in the public speres themselves being public?

    • Merricat says:

      Angela Levin is a lunatic. I’d feel sorry for her if she wasn’t such a nasty piece of work.

    • Couch+potato says:

      I think this BS is done deliberately so they can write more vile articles down the rode. “Chuck invited them and the ungrateful H&M didn’t come”. It’s all Meghan’s fault”. “The poor queen didn’t get to see Archie and Lilli at her jubilee” etc.

    • Mrs.Krabapple says:

      Whatever went down between Charles and Harry, is between Charles and Harry. I doubt Meghan is calling the shots on their relationship. Also, Charles needs to apologize. This backwards narrative is like the Trumpers who think reality is the opposite of what it is. But like Trumpers, you cannot argue with them, because their brains will never accept something that doesn’t fit into the narrative they WANT to believe.

  2. Wiglet Watcher says:

    If Charles wants them to visit he should make moves so they can pay for their own protection. He’s regent. He’s pulling most of the strings. He can make it happen.

    • Just Me says:

      Prince Charles already pulled the string that said no security! Charlie come lately is a total loser!

      • Wiglet Watcher says:

        He pulled taxfunded security. This time Harry wants to reimburse the costs. This could be spun to Charles’s advantage if he was smart. The peacekeeper king to be. The loving father. The diplomat.
        Instead a story gets floated and Charles does nothing.

  3. Noki says:

    Charles missed a huge opportunity with Harry and eventually Harry and Meghan. Had he treated Harry like the Queen treats Andrew this would have gotten under Williams skin and Rage monster eould have been out numbered and had to play nice. Giving Charles a little more power over William,especially the Grandpa aspect ,i doubt Harry would have used his kids to punish him.

    • Tessa says:

      I honestly don’t think Harry is ‘using his children’ to “punish” Charles. Charles in effect IMO turned his back on Harry and his family. Charles does not seem to care all that much for those children. A loving grandparent would have seen those children a long time ago on a regular basis. He could have told William to back off when William started after Harry about “slowing down.” He also did not intervene when Harry and Meghan’s wreath was not allowed to be placed on Remembrance Day. Charles needs to deal with the consequences of the way he treated Harry.

    • PaulaH says:

      Charles ONLY cares about Wlliam and George. He doesn’t give a rats arse about Harry, Meghan, Kate, Charlotte, Louis, etc. He would throw Kate in front of a moving bus to save William and would give Charlotte’s heart to George if it was needed to save George’s life. That is how things work in that awful family.

      • Becks1 says:

        I agree with you but I think its a little more complicated than that with William and Charles, bc I don’t think Charles actually likes William and I think he’s disappointed by his laziness and lack of work/major accomplishments at 40. I do think Charles liked Harry and was proud of Harry, but then you have the whole “he would throw Kate in front of a moving bus to save William” like you said but over the past 40 years its been “he would throw Harry in front of a moving bus to save William” regardless of how much he may like him.

        the windsor dynamics are so toxic and messed up, where the role of “the heir” trumps all.

      • Harper says:

        Can you imagine the meltdown that William and Kate would have if the visit actually did occur and there were lovely photos in every paper and on every news station of Charles bouncing Lilibet on his knee and Camilla drinking tea with Archie? William would have to be hospitalized from rage-induced head implosion. I would like the visit to happen ONLY for this reason.

      • PaulaH says:

        @Becks1: I would also say The Queen prefers Andrew to Charles however when it is all said and done she would throw Andrew in front of a moving train to save Charles. They have ONE purpose and that is to protect, preserve and defend the Monarchy and future heirs. Everyone else is collateral damage in that ONE purpose.

      • Tessa says:

        The married ins are dispensable as well. Philip would write these sympathetic letters to Diana on behalf of himself and the Queen, but when worse came to worse, they stuck by Charles, the heir. ANd if Will wanted another woman, they would be all for William not Kate. That’s how they operate.

  4. Scorpion says:

    Maybe it’s just me but I wouldnt come to this fakakta Jubilee. Hell, I’m a Brit and I am already over Betty and the parties she throws every decade to celebrate herself and her freeloading family.

    • Over it says:

      Imagine so many people loosing their jobs due to the pandemic, but all this grifting welfare recipients family can think of is just how much more ways they can squeeze more out of the public for dumb shit. If she wants a party this badly, then she should pay for it herself. She could use the money she is giving her favorite son for his legal woes.

  5. Cessily says:

    Is there an elder care home that can take this delusional old lady who is obviously dealing with memory and dementia issues? (I like my spin better than hers).

  6. Lili says:

    Levin Clearly knows nothing! I agree that Meghan Likely suffers Black woman syndrome of making peace and being accommodating. but sure lets put the blame on Meghan her shoulder are broad enough.

  7. Over it says:

    Oh do shut your pie hole Angela. You unhinged nut job. Believe it or not Harry makes his own decisions about his racist, abusive family, stop blaming Meghan for everything, especially things she stays out of. I don’t get why these people don’t get That Harry is wise to all this performative bullshit. He isn’t dumb despite what the British media and monarchy would have you believe

  8. Eurydice says:

    Yeah, Meghan had a very painful couple of years with that family, but Harry’s had a lifetime with them and (it seems) he blames them in part for his mother’s death.

    • Nick G says:

      @Eurydice I agree with you honestly that he blames them. In “The Me You Can’t See” , speaking about the memory of being in the back seat while Diana was being chased by paparazzi, he gave a throwaway description of her, “seatbelt fastened”, and just kept on talking. I believe a good psychotherapist would have recognized a universe between those couple of words. I remember thinking, H&M have given us the tip of the iceberg, and there’s no way they can tell the public everything they think and feel.

  9. Amy Bee says:

    Harry would definitely be the one saying no thanks to Charles’ offer. He knows his father better than Meghan and he knows that if they were to stay at CH, Charles and his courtiers would be leaking to the press. It would be KP all over again and Harry doesn’t want that. People forget that it was CH who leaked Harry and Meghan’s plan to leave to the Sun. Charles told Harry to put his plan in writing but Harry was very reluctant do so because he thought it would be leaked and he was right. There’s no way Harry’s going to accept that offer knowing that Charles is beholden to the press.

    • Becks1 says:

      I always thought it was William who leaked it. I don’t think Charles would have gone to Dan Wootton.

      • Amy Bee says:

        @Becks: Charles and Camilla have a very close relationship with the Sun. The Sun threw a party for Charles’s 70th birthday which he attended. Plus, most of the major stories about the Royal Family are never broken by the royal rota, they are given to reporters who don’t usually work that beat.

      • Becks1 says:

        yeah, but I still think it was William, since he had to pay the piper for the Rose story. We can disagree on it though.

      • Amy Bee says:

        @Becks: Yeah we will disagree on this because Charles is as much a part of the smear campaign against Harry and Meghan as William is. Charles has his own dirt that he wants quiet too. Furthermore, even if you want to blame the whole thing on William, Charles supposed silence and lack response means he was complicit and approved of what was going on. Both KP and CH have made it clear that William and Charles have bonded over this mess with Harry. Charles chose a side very early on and it wasn’t Harry’s. Charles stans need to accept that he’s not innocent in this.

      • Becks1 says:

        LOL, I am not a Charles stan and I never said that I blame the whole thing on William. You seem to be attacking things that I never said.

        Like I said, we can just disagree on who leaked what and when, hopefully without being accused of being a stan for one or the other.

      • Yinyang says:

        I hate The Sun. Such trash

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        There is a lot more out there that supports that leak (and others) came from KP. Like evidence of stories not being corrected by KP. CB & Lainey covered it quite well. Christian Jones received a promotion in March 2020. He became Prince William’s private secretary. Jones denied his involvement before being asked. Not suspicious at all.lol This twitter thread came up in the search.
        https://twitter.com/royal_suitor/status/1269153655581794307

        The 70th tea party included 70 readers who also turned 70 in 2018.

      • Nic919 says:

        Wootton got his information from Christian Jones or Jason Knauf and both of them work for William. There are other things in the smear campaign we can pin to charles, but the leak of them leaving comes from KP.

      • RoyalAssassin says:

        @AmyBee & @Becks: You’re both right, there’s no need for disagreement. You have to take into account the timing and details. Charles was the first to react badly to H&M’s popularity explosion on their first tour, which was to Australia. Woah, history repeating or what: that’s when he lost his marbles with Diana–the country went WILD for her, and he was even told by members of the public who’d lined up to see her, “Can you please swap sides of the road with Diana?” and that was on the news, it was recorded, sound on, and everyone laughed, including him, but the truth is it burned his arse SO badly; he started making references to it in a joking manner, but it was a serious thing: Diana had conquered the world, and Charles was losing his footing.

        Fast fwd 35 yrs, and there’s H&M doing the same thing all over again. Charles went postal, seeing before him the same thing that had shaken him back on that first Aussie tour: he saw Diana in his son, and he saw Diana in Meghan. He was double whammied, and it was then shit started to fly in the UK media.

        William AND Kate threw Harry under the bus, selling out both of them as a pay-off to deflect from the Wandering Willy stories. They’ve been far more persistent with this than Charles ever was; I lean towards Charles’ offer being quite genuine. However, nothing W&K do is. Nothing. Zero. Like their museum visit charade, when she Copy Keened Meghan from head to toe. Un-f*cking-real. Just…I can’t even…

  10. Andrews Nemesis says:

    Expert? Angela Levin is an expert? If that is so, I’m a bloody giraffe.

  11. lanne says:

    This old mooing cow is one of the most notorious ratchets who interacted with the white supremist haters. I wish someone would out her for that. She interacted with all of the moon baby weirdos and crazy sister. Why is anyone listening to her?

    • Jais says:

      This lady is a wackadoodle. I can’t take anything she says seriously. But her amplication of Meghan hate is dangerous.

  12. chill says:

    LOL! Don’t these people have families? All families fight. Most compromise and make up. Often the fights are awful. But, most people compromise for family. This will happen if Harry gets the security/protection he wants.

    • Jaded says:

      They aren’t “most families”, they’re a rich, powerful, racist nest of vipers who regularly sink to deceit, subterfuge, back-stabbing and smearing each other in the tabloids. Compromise will not happen even if Harry gets his requested RPO security. That lot make the Machiavellis look like the Brady Bunch.

  13. Tessa says:

    I doubt Meghan and Charles had a “close”relationship.

    • Amy Bee says:

      @Tessa: Me too. That “close” relationship was concocted by CH.

    • Becks1 says:

      I’m sure they got along and Meghan was lovely to him, but yeah, I don’t think they were close. It was definitely something put out there to make charles look better, which again is interesting/frustrating because charles clearly knew that being close to Meghan made him look better. WHY throw it all away like he did??

      Even when the smear campaign started, Charles could have stepped in and made a big deal about how he was protecting his daughter-in-law, isn’t he a wonderful person, etc. Instead…..he fed her to the wolves.

      • Amy Bee says:

        @Becks: Charles could not have stepped in if he was part of the smear campaign. The tiara story came out in Charles’ authorised biography and then there was story that Meghan was supposed to attended the opening of Charles’ birthday exhibition but backed out because the media was invited and how Charles was upset by that. These stories were leaked by CH.

      • Becks1 says:

        I mean, he still could have stepped in, absolutely. It actually would have been kind of brilliant -to have started the smear campaign and then stepped in to try to end it.

        I know when the tiara story came out. I’m not sure why you’re attacking me today like you think I’m Team Charles or something or that I haven’t been here following all this for the past several years with you.

  14. Becks1 says:

    LOL, this is hilarious bc Levin knows nothing. I don’t think she’s someone who even occasionally gets some inside scoop from a palace source or whatever (like no one at KP or CH is picking up the phone to even spread lies through her, you know?)

    But of course, poor Charles is the victim and Harry should be the one apologizing and Meghan would just feel too awkward so there is no way they can go to the UK and stay with Charles etc.

    I guess the thing is though, this “will they or won’t they” go to the UK is the only thing the RRs have to talk about with the Sussexes (well that and how they water their lawn. and Delaware.) We have seen it for a year now with Phillip being sick, Phillip dying, the statute unveiling, the reception in the fall, Christmas, and now the jubilee. They are so desperate for the Sussexes to go back so they can weeks worth of stories about it.

    And part of what’s so funny about it is that if they do go back (and I know sussex fans are divided on that issue so I am not trying to get into a debate as to whether they “should”) but IF they do – I think any visit back would be like Harry’s visit in the summer. They would visit their private charities, do whatever public event they may be scheduled for (IF anything), and that’s it. We wouldn’t see the children, we wouldn’t see them out riding with the Queen, we wouldn’t see them shopping at Harrod’s, whatever. Those two operate in stealth-mode and that’s how it would be in the UK. We would only see pictures of the events that they wanted the public to know about and that would be it. Angela Levin probably wouldn’t even know they were there until they had already left lol.

    • Eurydice says:

      ITA. And too funny about them having left the country before the rota find out. (That’s if the leaky palaces don’t spill the tea.) Actually, I don’t think it would be much different than what the RF in the UK does anyway. We don’t see much of W&K’s children, other than sanctioned photos – we don’t see them all riding with the Queen – we don’t see warm family get-togethers. We see them visiting charities and smiling at each other at public events. With H&M, I don’t think the press will respect the privacy of Archie and Lilibet – they’ll probably say “well, they’re private citizens and fair game.” but I’m sure H&M will be prepared for that.

  15. Harper says:

    If Meghan stays at CH then two days later Levin will be tweeting that Meghan threw hot tea at the staff again.

  16. matthew says:

    I think if it were only up to Meghan they might still be in the UK trying to work it out and it was actually Harry who pushed to leave.

    • Jan says:

      I don’t think so, she called them “my husband’s family” one of the few things said about Meghan that I believe, is when she moves on she is finished. Examples her dad, ex-friend, no acknowledgement of their spitting in the wind.

  17. ABritGuest says:

    I heard rumour that the truly despicable Angela Levin is writing a book on Camilla which is why she was in Egypt with them. If H&M stayed with Charles no doubt it will end up in her book with takes about how gracious Charles & Camilla were to them.

    There will probably be so many stories for the tabloids from any visit to Harry’s wider Windsor family, no doubt having digs at how “American” the kids are. if Archie had a tantrum as toddlers do, there will probably be a version of “what Archie wants Archie gets”.

    Why would Charles want the ‘bully’ Meghan around anyway? I thought the royals were all glad the drama had gone & that Camilla could never forgive Harry for what he had done to Charles? The royals seem oddly keen to put out invites to people that were supposedly awful to them, terrorised their staff & that they can’t trust.

    • Tessa says:

      If Levin is writing a book about Camilla, undoubtedly Diana would be slammed and blamed. Just like Junor did to her And of course, she would go after Harry and Meghan.

  18. Heather says:

    I agree about Meghan being the peacemaker of the two. Harry lived that dysfunction for 30+ years and is happy to be away from it.

    I love the line ‘I WILL BURN THIS PALACE DOWN!’ 🤣🤣

    I also bet Meghan and Harry are lovely to the York sisters even though their father is a creep and losing his Royal everything. It’s not their fault he’s who he is and I’m sure Meghan and Harry – unlike the rest of the RF – see it that way and are able to keep those 2 things separate and certainly not leak shit to the media like the rest of the RF.

    Also, if the RF thinks Miss Keen is the answer to their ‘salvaging the RF/monarch’ – oh boy. They’re in for a disappointment. H&M were the best thing in that family for salvaging things and they ran them out. What a loss.

    I stand by my prediction – the monarch/crown will be obsolete within the next 5-8 years.

  19. JD says:

    If he wants to see his grandchildren so badly, he can get on a plane and fly to sunny CA. How is this difficult?

  20. North of Boston says:

    Awkward?!?

    It wouldn’t be awkward for the Sussexes to be guests at Clarence House, it would be f-n dangerous. I wouldn’t close my eyes with C & c, their palace aides or the grey suits slipping about. And that old fantasy story warning “while in these walls, do not eat or drink anything offered to you, lest harm befall you” comes to mind.

  21. MerlinsMom1018 says:

    Every time I see this picture I have this thought
    Harry ready to throw hands…”I wish a mf’er would”
    William ready to throw Kate in front of him if Harry swings
    Charles hoping Harry does
    Kate swallowed a lemon looking at Meghan because…well Meghan
    Meghan looking 🔥🔥🔥🔥

    • Tessa says:

      Kate flirting with Harry.

    • BeanieBeanb says:

      Right? Harry looks like a panther stalking his prey, William looks like he’d knock down his own grandmother to get out of there, & Kate’s looking like she might throw up or wet her pants. Or both. Meghan is serene sublimity.

  22. equality says:

    If Charles were sincere in just wanting to make peace there are many estates of the Queens where people can stay in separate houses. He didn’t have to pick a place where they would all be in one household. And he could have picked somewhere more private than in London. I didn’t realize how large CH is. There is apparently a cinema room (and an AGA-eat your heart out Kate). Nobody complains about that but Meghan might have a simple yoga room and it’s terrible. Also it has 14 bedrooms compared to the 9 in H&M’s home. Every time these fools open their mouths I find more ways to despise the difference in treatment between H&M and the rest.

  23. TigerMcQueen says:

    They keep trying to push this narrative that Meghan is the one keeping Harry from the RF, when it’s always Harry who goes way more nuclear on them.

    Honestly, given the unhinged stories they’re pushing lately, combined with their determination to not give his family proper protection if in the UK, I would not be surprised if Harry’s memoir DOES go into some of the toxic detail of growing up in the RF. At first, I thought it would focus on his own personal journey (time in the military, establishing Invictus, etc.) and kind of skip over the dysfunction of the firm, but now I’m not so sure that will be the case.

  24. Yinyang says:

    Was there ever a time when Meghan and Harry were around that William didn’t look like a snob. His nose is turned all the way up, his chest puffed out and that smug smirk of an enitited man living off the government

  25. Sofia says:

    I don’t even the read the actual articles written by Levin and Wootton anymore – it’s the same unhinged drivel every time.

    Anyways, I doubt they would stay with Charles – invite or not. They’ve got Frogmore and if not Frogmore, there’s lots of hotels they can use in the capital. So there’s no need beyond the “it’s a gesture” but like I said, no *need*.

  26. Yinyang says:

    Charles is going to be king probably any day now. He’s trying to clean up his image and slyly take place as king. Commonwealth countries like Jamaica, Canada and Australia need to wise up and call it quits or they’ll be in this forever

    • Jaded says:

      Canadian here – easier said than done, although I would be delighted if the “leave the commonwealth” wheels were put in motion. However, it would take separate referendums of each province and territory as well as the 30+ First Nations treaties with the monarch which are separate from the provincial ones. It would decades of scrapping and I doubt agreement would ever be reached.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Given what has been revealed in the last year, esp regarding First Nations children at boarding schools? Don’t you think that could tip scales towards everyone (including Quebec, shocking I know) moving against the UK?

      • Jaded says:

        @nota – I fervently wish that were true, and many Canadians think the same, but it would require Parliament, the House of Commons, the Senate and all 10 provinces to unanimously agree to amend our Constitution. That could take many years, and there would also need to be independent consultations with each of our First Nation’s peoples given the historical treaties between them and the Crown. It would actually be easier to get rid of the monarchy in the UK than it would be in Canada, as Britain’s governing structure requires fewer permissions before making fundamental changes.

      • Nic919 says:

        The Canadian government already pays out when it comes to court decisions and the like. It is not Liz Windsor pulling out her wallet. The crown of Canada already exists as a concept distinct from the crown of the UK and so it would simply be a matter of declaring that the new form of the Canadian government would assume the liabilities of the previous version. After all Canada didn’t exist as a country when the obligations of the royal proclamation of 1763 established the rights for the indigenous peoples and in any decision the courts made the current Canadian government pay out. So I don’t think the First Nations would be the stumbling block here.

        Certain provinces might not pass the referendum but we don’t need all 10 to do it. It can happen if there is political will. After all the charter and repatriation happened in 1982.

  27. BothSidesNow says:

    I actually believe that Meghan is the one who is pushing for reconciliation. As for Harry, he has been abused by his family for decades and the mistreatment of Meghan by his father, and his grandmother that refused to called off the rabid dogs would have immediately stopped the smear campaign. Furthermore, Charles and TQ should have blocked the Bitter Brother, as well as CopyKeen, for their horrendous smear campaign from the very beginning.

    Plus, I agree that the Bitter Brother outed Harry and Meghans plans the moment they dropped. The Bitter Brother, and CopyKeen, had an agenda to build them both up as unacceptable and unworthy of their positions. In addition to allowed JK to work in hand with the Sun further implicates the Lambidges.

    As for Levin, she is so far up the arses of Charles and Camilla, that she puts out this statement of Harry needing to apologize is utterly bonkers! Harry and Meghan are the TRUE victims, not one member on the RF has clean hands in their campaign of hate and underhanded actions.

    • Tessa says:

      I think both Meghan and Harry are very unhappy with Charles, taking away protection from his own grandchildren for one thing. I don’t think either of them are trusting of Charles.If Charles wanted a reconciliation he would have not allowed William to treat his brother that way, and Charles would have fired Jason Knauf pronto.

  28. kelleybelle says:

    #AngelaLevinisaliar

    That being said, I thought that William looked like a man who’s just been to the loo and can’t remember whether he’s wiped himself or not. He looked that way throughout the whole CW service. Just so awkward, and Kate looked bitchy and mean, and so did Sophie. What a bunch of a-holes.

  29. MelOn says:

    Are they pretending that they didn’t see the interview? Harry was angry and I think he had to be convinced not to name the royal racist. I believe that he’s holding that plus a lot of other things in his back pocket. As for staying with Charles, that’s what hotels are for.

    • Yinyang says:

      That’s what narcissistic do, pretend they didn’t have that conversation so they can go back to being at the top, best to not play these games, is only way you can get out if it.

  30. Soni says:

    I have been binging on documentaries about British history the last few weeks. When you analyze how the monarchy was set up (only the first born, usually male heir, was important) you can connect the dots to today’s Windsor clan. There’s no space or place for the other children and the system perpetuates jealousies, envy, etc. of anyone who takes attention from the monarchs or soon to be monarchs. There’s no way for any sane person to survive in that family. And the royal family today only exists to find ways to continues its existence. The British people (I’m of course generalizing here) are used to rituals like the jubilee, etc. and those events are the only reason why the monarchy exists- habits and rituals. Harry confronted this thousand plus year old system that keeps the rest of the family in a lap of luxury and there’s no way he will ever be forgiven for that.

    Hope that made sense!

  31. tamsin says:

    I think that little gnome Angela is quite unhinged and dangerous because of the type of untruths she tells and the scenarios she imagines. I think she must have serious emotional and mental issues of her own to be this obsessed with tearing Meghan and Harry down. It’s my impression that she’s been dining out for years on a single, brief interview with Harry. She has seriously monetized her hate for Meghan, and I don’t understand the impetus for this hatred at all. It seems to go beyond racism even.

  32. blujfly says:

    Levin often retweets single-purpose Twitter accounts that believe that Meghan was never pregnant and Archie was born of a surrogate, or Archie does not even exist. I can only assume the awkwardness of which she speaks is of course the entire Royal Family and Charles and Camilla allowing this Deep State fraud to be perpetuated.

    • Tessa says:

      How Charles keeps quiet over this shows him not to be father or grandfather of the year. Letting those rumors stay out there. He could have stopped it ages ago.

  33. This annoying kobold Angela always inserts herself in Harry’s life. She did his biography once and she feels entitled to meddle in his life. Scram you troll.