Comments on: Brad Pitt & Angelina Jolie’s kids are running amok, plus “triangle” drama

By: jen

jen — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 01:57:33 +0000

I think the girl from africa she adopted is seriously ugly. To bad they can’t make a return like take her back to the pound DUH. Well any way Madonna new daughter top her in ugly they got to be the uglyist kids I ever seen, why would anyone adopt ugly children, talk about how jealous they will be. Her adopted boys are just a little below average even their own kids well I have seen much better, like how beautiful Jennifer Aniston kids would of been if she had any. I just don’t get ugly with them,it is not about race they are just not good looking children.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: kim

kim — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:04:41 +0000

Since she is the highest paid actress in the world according to the Hollywood Reporter.I’m sure she bought several copies of the same dress or she can get one of the dozens of people on her staff(nannies,assistants, housekeepers, chefs etc) to wash the dress after she wears it.OK Haters. For one day go comment on a celeb that you like and see how that positive energy transfers to your personal life. Negativity attracts negativity . Peace!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Loser1

Loser1 — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:48:59 +0000

OK, the hypocracy on this board is ridiculous. Every comment on Suri Cruise is about what a brat she must be and yet none of you brangeloonies can believe that these kids are brats. Atleast Katie keeps Suri clean. Ugh, Angelina, get a new dress already! She must smell.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Laura

Laura — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:30:28 +0000

@Lennie

Go to any “Chinnifer” story on this site. You’ll see the exact same thing. Because instead of the “Sisterhood,” you’ll see Brangelunatics “whining” about the very same inane things.

Works both ways.

After all, she is fascinating. Indeed.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: lennie

lennie — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:40:30 +0000

It really funny how people on here talk about the “Brangeloonies”, and about how they are “tired” or have “enough” of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie.
Yet first, only in this thread there are a way much more comments from those people than from the supposed Brangeloonies. My conclusion: not tired enough of them? Can’t give up?
And then the comments seem to deny a simple boohoo sisterhood, but yet all I read is whinning about Angie’s dresses, Angie’s kids. Personally, as a Brangelina fan I really don’t care about Chinnifer Maniston’s dresses for example, and I won’t waste my time boohooing about her stuff because she just doesn’t get into me. So another conclusion: boohoo sisterhood is all about boohoo sisterhood, and again not tired enough, can’t give up on Angelina? After all, she is fascinating. Indeed.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Josephina

Josephina — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:41:48 +0000

May God continue to bless the Jolie-Pitts and others who raise families and give their time to the forgotten people of this world.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: maddie

maddie — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:32:53 +0000

As much as I hate the Sainted Saints, I truly doubt this story, if this was true those kids would be running amok period, and hyper as hell 24/7, when they the kids are always behaving when in front of the camera.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: badhorse

badhorse — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:26:58 +0000

Those long black dresses look awful on her. Why oh why does it continue?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Sincera

Sincera — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 02:21:31 +0000

just because u are rich and famous doesn’t mean u are suitable parents…i kno they have turned these kids lives around but just imagine what kind of people they will grow up to be

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Lindsay

Lindsay — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 20:56:31 +0000

Twinkle Toes – I’s like to hear more too!

IF ANYONE IS INTERESTED IN THE ANSWER TO SELA’S QUESTION:
The magazines don’t get sued because:
- Each magazine has teams of lawyers that approve the stories and make sure the appropriate disclaimers are in there.
- They hide behind the sources, saying it has been confirmed and it is not their fault if sources are lying and if the do the due diligence fact checks (which they don’t look very hard at) then they are not responsible.
- Sources hide behind the press shield laws, so they don’t have to testify about any untruthful statements or jeopardize friendships or their career by revealing their identity.
- They twist the celebrity’s own words and photos of them to out of context that seem to support the story and applying misleading captions and “body language experts.” Poor integrity and bad journalistic integrity but not illegal.
- The standards of slander and defamation of character are higher since they are considered public figures. The average private citizen could sue over some of the information that celebrities cannot.
- Publication of private facts (when the statements are proven to be truthful but harmful in someway) laws don’t apply to them.
- The celebrities would have to testify in open court and reveal possibly damaging and embarrassing information to refute these claims – which would make it worse for than ignoring or denying the rumors.
- There are so many stories that come out and law suits can take a while all they would be doing is suing and testifying.

For those reasons they only go after photos that violate their privacy or are inappropriate (like the George Clooney picture of the teenager.) Plus they are:
- Easy to prove and applies equally to everyone.
- They don’t have to reveal any private information, other then “yes, I was sunbathing topless in my own private back yard” a la Cathrine Zeta Jones or “yes, a friend of the family came over with their daughter and she changed clothes in my house. I was not in the room.”
- Sometimes they don’t even have to go to court at all.
- Damages (amount of money the magazine has to pay) can be substantial.
- Discourages them from trying something like that again, knowing that the celeb has sued before.
- They almost always win.

Hopefully the list form makes it easier to read. In paragraph form it was long. I wasn’t trying to talk down to anyone – I just know their are readers from other countries and even here that do not fully understand the American court system. That is why I explained terms you may already be familiar with.

Report this comment as spam or abuse