Stylish Celebrity Escapism
Contributing Writers
Nov 27
'07
Princess Diana Wasn’t Pregnant

princessdianaheader.jpg
It may have taken ten years for the inquiry into Princess Diana’s death to even start, probably because there wasn’t really a need for one. She was once a royal, but she did her duty – produced heirs for the throne. She was basically famous for being famous, and supporting worthy causes. One of the major controversies surrounding her death may have been solved. It turns out she wasn’t pregnant, according to evidence given at the British inquiry into the car crash by pathologist Robert Chapman.

“An established pregnancy will show one a change in the size of the uterus, a change in the thickness of the lining and presence of a gestation sac — an embryo with membranes — attached to the wall of the uterus, and there will be changes also in the appearance of the ovaries.”

“Were any of these indications present here?” counsel to the inquest Nicholas Hilliard asked.

“No,” Chapman said.

[Sydney Morning Herald]

Apparently it is standard practice to examine a woman of childbearing age’s womb and ovaries.

But the pathologist doesn’t rule out that she could have been less than 14 days pregnant. Of course, it is unlikely that Diana herself would have known she was pregnant in those early stages either.

“Certainly from day one to seven there could not or would not be anything to see,” he said.

“From day seven to 14 you might see something. Thereafter there is an increasing likelihood of being able to see things which would indicate pregnancy.”

Dodi’s own father Mohammed Al Fayed believed that the princess was pregnant and that Dodi and Diana were killed in a plot orchestrated by Prince Phillip and the British intelligence service M16. Two such conspiracy theorists were in the court, but were removed after causing a disruption.

The other big conspiracy was that Dodi and Diana were engaged to be married, and that she was going to reveal this outside the Ritz Hotel in Paris, which is why the photographers were there to chase her into that fateful tunnel. Or possibly she was going to announce the pregnancy. Which hardly seems likely – surely Diana would have given the exclusive to Hello magazine. Or done another Panorama interview.

Note by Celebitchy: I do think there’s more to this story than a simple car crash. Princess Diana wrote a letter 10 months before her death saying that factions were planning a car accident for her to clear the way for Charles to remarry. She may not have been pregnant, but it’s pretty suspicious that she died in the way she predicted.
princessdiana.jpg

Written by Helen

Posted in Dodi Al Fayed, Princess Diana

On-Page Comments are closed.

Add a comment in pop-up window
(for posts before 4/21/08)
On April 21, 2008, comments were moved from the pop-up Haloscan format onto the page. Older posts still use the Haloscan comments for discussions, and you are welcome to comment there. All new posts use on-page commenting.

Recent Comments:
  • Barbara: Exactly why is that “creepy”? Becuase the talented and funny Jonah Hill would stoop to dating an...
  • enchantress: If David Beckham was my neighbor I’d be falling all over myself waving at him too :mrgreen: Posh,...
  • enchantress: I don’t know why this is, and it’s totally off the subject, but something about her face has...
  • Ethan: The only thing that O has revealed is that she is supporting the advancement of women only when it comes to...
  • enchantress: Just the other day I turned on the T.V. and “Beetlejuice” was on - Gawd, Alec Baldwin HAS...
  • rottenkitty: Correction, Alec Baldwin’s career doesn’t go back to 1963 — it started in 1980. My bad.
  • Ethan: “Obama is Oprah’s Senator, she lives in Chicago. She’s followed his career and has voted for him...
  • Pamela: Kendra is my favorite!! She’s actually acting like she’s got a personality and being herself. So...
 
 

Celebitchy is a celebrity gossip site written by several independent authors. The opinions of the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the site owner. All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Articles are based on rumor, conjecture, and published information in other sources. The site makes no claims that content is valid, accurate, or true. The site owner and the authors contributing to it will not be held liable for damages resulting from errors, omissions or falsehoods published on this site. It is not the site owner or the contributing authors' intention to defame or malign any particular group, religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual. The site owner is not responsible for content on linked or quoted sources. All comments made by visitors to the blog are the responsibility of their respective authors and are only sporadically monitored. The site owner will not be held liable for comments in any way.