Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt design snake-inspired jewelry for charity

MOCA NEW 30th Anniversary Gala - Cocktails

Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie have added another hyphenated job description to their resume: jewelry designers. They have designed a limited-edition “capsule” collection line for Asprey, called “The Protector”. The Protector line is based on all things snakes. Snake rings, snake pendants, snake earrings, snake baby spoon, snake goblet, and snake bracelets, amongst other pieces (slideshow here). While the snake baby spoon freaks me out, I’m loving the snake rings and the snake pendants. They’re gorgeous. Apparently, the whole snake thing was inspired by a ring Angelina got when she was pregnant with Shiloh – and apparently, Angelina considers snakes the “talisman and protector of her family.” For real. The Asprey line will go on sale around the world later this week, and the proceeds will go to the Education Partnership for Children of Conflict, which “raises awareness and funds to educate child victims of war, conflict and natural disasters.”

There’s a new designer duo in the jewelry world: none other than Brangelina.

Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are breaking into high-end jewelry design with Asprey via a capsule collection of gold jewelry and silver accessories called The Protector — and inspired by the snake.

The limited edition collection, which was conceived and designed by Pitt and Jolie, has been in the works for more than a year, and will go on sale at Asprey stores in London, New York, Beverly Hills, Tokyo and Dubai later this week, according to Asprey officials.

Prices start at $525 for a silver baby spoon with a curving, serpent-shaped handle, and all net proceeds from sales will go to Education Partnership for Children of Conflict, which was cofounded by Jolie in 2006. The charity raises awareness and funds to educate child victims of war, conflict and natural disasters.

Jolie and Pitt declined to talk about their collection for Asprey, opting instead to discuss the aims of the charity in an e-mailed quote attributed to Jolie: “These are the children who most need a safe place to learn, a place to heal, a place to learn reconciliation, a place to build a better future and a place — to just be children. Yet the education for these children is often forgotten. Tens of millions of children and adolescents in conflict are not in school.”

An Asprey spokeswoman declined to comment on the collection beyond confirming the facts, and would not say whether celebrity collaborations would be a future strategy for the brand.

The jewelry-loving Jolie has worn Asprey — and other names including Lorraine Schwartz and Mikimoto — on the red carpet. Pitt, who has a passion for architecture and design, in the past has created pieces for the Italian jeweler Damiani. Both Jolie and Pitt have also commissioned pieces privately from Asprey.

So why the serpent theme? When she was pregnant with their daughter Shiloh, Jolie was given a ring — not from Asprey — in the shape of a snake. Since then she’s considered the reptile a talisman and protector of her family.

The collection features silver baby gifts such as the spoon, an eggcup, tooth box and picture frame. For older children and adults, there are pendants and rings made from gold and micropavé diamonds, all featuring curving snakes.

Prices for the top-end pieces have yet to be confirmed and include diamond, black diamond and emerald pavé rings; bracelets; earrings, men’s cuff links, and dress studs. Jolie wore one of the serpent bracelets from the collection to the BAFTA Awards in London in February.

The collaboration is a major boost for Asprey, which is rebuilding its business and polishing its image under new chairman John Rigas, whose Sciens Capital Management purchased the brand with Plainfield Asset Management in 2006.

Together with chief executive officer Robert Procop, Rigas has narrowed Asprey’s product offering and put a fresh focus on bridal and high-end jewelry. The two have also rehired many of the silver, jewelry and leather craftsmen who had worked for Asprey in the past, and put a new emphasis on the bespoke rooms in the store. Today, clients can commission work and have a say in the design of bespoke objects.

Asprey has also tapped Bruce Hoeksema, the former president of Valentino USA and founder and designer of the VBH accessories label, to design a line of luxury handbags for the brand.

“Our aim has been to narrow and refocus the brand, which had gone down-market in terms of quality,” Rigas told WWD last month. “We want to improve it and give it back to its [traditional] clientele.”

According to Rigas, jewelry makes up more than 50 percent of Asprey’s sales, followed by leather and silver, which generate about 15 percent, and watches, which account for 12 percent. The rest comes from products such as silks, china and vintage books.

Asprey has sales of about $35 million annually, according to Rigas, who hopes to increase sales by 50 percent “within the next two years,” and double them in three to five years.

[From Women’s Wear Daily]

There are no prices listed on these bad boys, and I suspect this stuff is crazy expensive. My guess for one of these snake pendants I’m lusting after is probably in the neighborhood of $10,000. Just my guess! As far as the snake thing goes, I doubt Angelina only considered the snake her talisman when she was pregnant with Shiloh – allegedly, Angelina has always been a fan of snakes and reptiles, and had many when she was a kid. Angelina and the snake of power and protection have a long history!

Brad and Angelina at MoCA, November 14, 2009. Credit: Getty/PicApp. Photos of Asprey’s “The Protector” line courtesy of WWD.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

78 Responses to “Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt design snake-inspired jewelry for charity”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. BitterBetty says:

    Hideously tacky, but at least it’s for charity.

  2. Kayleigh says:

    I have GOT to get that snake baby spoon! Cause nothing says “OPEN UP!” like a potentially poisonous snake staring dead at you.

  3. Firestarter says:

    I have a ring similar from QVC . $39!

  4. Iggles says:

    Oh man. I am definitely a Brangelina fan, but that photo scares me a little. Their body language is alarming — standing apart, closed off (his hands are in his pocket, her’s together clasping a garment).

    I usually suck at deciphering body language, but did anyone else pick up on this in viewing the picture??

  5. Oxida says:

    Those pendants look like turds. I’m sorry, but they do.

  6. Daisy says:

    I love snake jewelry,although they could have done a little better with the designs.I’m not trying to continue my ranting against A.J.but I have to say 1 quick thing,snakes?Thats perfect for her,she should identify with snakes well :]

  7. BitterBetty says:

    Iggles, I think they’re just trying to look like they give a shit about art.

  8. Beth says:

    Why is it that everytime Brad and Angelina do something, it’s a huge story but when somebody else does the same thing it doesn’t get reported or is just a link? This could have been added to the MOCA story.

  9. lucy2 says:

    Good charity, ugly jewelry. And if the spoon starts at $500, everything must be very pricey. I’ll be curious to see how much sells and how much it earns for the charity. Hopefully a lot, as its a good cause.
    Angelina considering a snake as her talisman? Come on, she’s just baiting all gossipers to make the comparisons! ;D

  10. ogechi says:

    nonesense!!!!

  11. Cheyenne says:

    To iggles: maybe you will like this body language better:

    http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/93069498

    For the record, they’re at a museum showing, not a red carpet event. And I really think it’s a tad ridiculous for people to start circulating break-up rumors every time a photo is posted where Angie’s hand isn’t plastered to Brad’s ass or Brad’s tongue isn’t shoved down her throat.

  12. Charity is Chic says:

    Someone please tell me why these required a private tour? I know hanging out with riff raff like other celebrities is very taxing on these two, but seriously? WTF!!

  13. Meimei says:

    “I usually suck at deciphering body language, but did anyone else pick up on this in viewing the picture??”

    Didn’t even think about the picture before I read your comment, but I’d say it would seem quite awkward if they were glued to each other in an art gallery. Real enthusiasm or not, they should look sufficiently serious.

    So, I’m echoing BitterBetty snd Cheyenne. 🙂

    The jewellery is damn amusing in all of its tackiness, although the spoon and the simple golden ring (can I get that one in silver) are nice.

  14. Anonymous says:

    Only business!
    Wait until after the Oscars!

  15. YeaRight! says:

    Awww, they are giving proceeds to educate children in far off countries.
    I guess that is cool.
    To bad they aren’t worried about their own kids getting an education!
    I just hope and pray these 2 are putting away fund for their kids future psychiatrists they are going to need.

  16. Cheyenne says:

    JJ has close-ups of the collection.

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/photo-gallery/2359841/angelina-jolie-jewelry-brad-pitt-asprey-01/

    They haven’t posted prices yet, but if Asprey is selling it, you know it costs a veritable shitload. This is high-end stuff.

  17. Tess says:

    Riiiiight.

    People with Big Buck$ to spend on jewelry are really gonna buy this stuff.

    Don’t think so. Would have been better to aim at the mass market with a much lower price point and maybe score some holiday sales.

  18. SageAdvice says:

    This looks like high-end Ren Faire jewelry. I would know, my sister worked a pewter-smith’s booth. All you’d need to do is slap some diamonds on there and you’d get this…klassy stuff.

    At least it’s for charity…

    Oh and Cheyenne, posting a video of Brad awkwardly rubbing her upper arm isn’t convincing anyone of anything.

  19. Iggles says:

    Cheyenne – Thanks for the link. Good to be wrong on this one! 😉

    I usually don’t buy into break up rumors, but that picture stuck me as odd and I saw it on a couple of sites — but not the other ones.

  20. SageAdvice says:

    And a snake spoon for your baby? Really?

  21. fizXgirl314 says:

    I think Cheyenne has found the purpose to her life lol…

  22. SageAdvice says:

    Just watched the video again and it’s every bit as awkward as I thought it was upon a first viewing.

    Fizz dear, Chey Chey’s lot in life is to serve and protect The Brange.

  23. Praise St. Angie! says:

    trying to make a judgment about someone’s relationship status after reading someone’s body language from a few pics (or a video) is just as silly as someone claiming that Brad “allowed” Jen to file for divorce so she could save face.

    NO ONE KNOWS what goes on behind closed doors. and no one knows what the details are behind the divorce filing except those parties involved, and their lawyers.

    I find it terribly amusing that those who complain about how silly the stories about this family are will often contribute equally silly stories. Stories that are just as “unprovable” as the ones in the tabs. Stories that make a reader go “how would you KNOW that unless you were standing in the kitchen with them when it happened?!”, just like the ones in the tabloids make them go “who would KNOW this stuff?!”

    as Kaiser (?) said the other day, either you believe all of it, or none of it. You can’t believe a story that was supplied by an “insider” (like Brad allowing Jen to file the divorce papers to save face) while NOT believing a story from an “insider” about how Brad is drinking to deal with Angie’s “evilness” or that Brad eggs the two of them on in their fights.

    Iggles, the pics struck me as odd, too. All the pics released show them in pics that seem very posed…there are NO sort of “candid” shots of them at all. I think it’s just what the photographer released which, as I said, seems strange to me.

    On topic: the jewelry is OK…but I agree with Tess – they should have aimed at the mass market and made them affordable gifts for Christmas that a lot of us “regular” folks would buy, and we’d be donating to a good cause, too.

  24. jeannified says:

    Maybe they got a private showing, because they are thinking of buying some of the pieces. Also, they just look like they’re evaluating the art, not preparing to break up! Please!

    As for the jewelry shown above, love it! It’s all gorgeous!

  25. Goddess711 says:

    Is it just me or is that one frosty looking couple? YEAH BABY – let the nasty breakup games begin! WOOHOOO!

  26. Firestarter says:

    @Jeannified- Since when do museums put their works of art up for sale? Hell, the economy must be worse than I even thought!

  27. Daisy says:

    Brad looks just plain mad

  28. Mimi says:

    About the jeweleries I LOVED i like sneaks… i’m a little strange because i actually like to see them EATEN animals… small or big (i now i’m weird).
    About the photos they are just looking to some paints it’s REALLY necessary to them being holding hands and being touching while locking at then?… with people locking, whispering and taking pictures of them?
    They don’t need be affectionate all the time specially for us fans, magslies and bloggers they are together for 5 years they are not teenagers that feel in love yesterday and need to be together all the f….. time.

    And i think that i’m in the wrong blog because i actually like what u said Praise St. Angie! and is probably the first time in this topic.
    WTH happen to ur sarcasm and accusations? Maybe just MAYBE u are became more reasonable? oh boy i never imagine that this day would come u are Ok? hope that everything is good in ur life hugs to u (the last part i really mean:)

  29. DD says:

    wow, now they can add jewellry designers to their long list of half-ass projects for charity.

  30. Firestarter says:

    I wish they would design a newsboy hat pin! I’d wear that proudly!

    Better yet, a snake WEARING a newsboy hat! Now that I’d buy!

  31. Cheyenne says:

    Anonymous: .Only business! Wait until after the Oscars!
    ********************************************

    How many Oscars do you want to wait for? IIRC you said that last year… and the year before that… and the year before that… and the year before that…

  32. DD says:

    @firestarter and that design will be coming in 5… 4… 3… 2…

    seriously though I’m highly anticipating the arrival of their daring foray into perfume design “eau du fart” with some blood mixed in for edge.

  33. lucy2 says:

    Yuck, the close up photos are even worse. I honestly can’t imagine that many people lining up to buy these.

  34. Praise St. Angie! says:

    Firestarter, how about a snake, wearing a newsboy hat, eating one of the gerbils of DOOM?

  35. Rosalee says:

    Nothing original about the jewelry designs. Then again I would wear a snake wearing a newsboy cap..

  36. Firestarter says:

    @St. Angie- OMG! I love it! Sign me up for two! Hahaha! How could I have forgotten about the Gerbils!

    Okay, someone correct me if I am wrong, because I missed where these paintings were for sale. Were they at a museum or gallery? I thought they were at a museum.

  37. alex says:

    Do some of you people on here work? Or is this your day job to post and say hateful things about people.

    Who the hell spend their whole day on a blog site analysing pictures and body language, talk about crazy and obsessive.

    Anyway the pictures in museum are not for sale.

    Yes, I have a job.

    Not a fan of snakes but I like these jewelry. I happen to think they are cute.

  38. Firestarter says:

    @Alex- Yes, this is my full time job, plus I can multi-task.

    I am currently faxing a report overseas, commenting on here, making a balloon giraffe and baking brownies for tonights PTA.

  39. Jojo says:

    WORST.CRAP.EVER

    The pendants look like a pile of doggie poo, and everything looks CHEAP.

    Celebitchy, are you sure this isn’t the Joan Rivers collection from QVC?

  40. tekhana says:

    Sheesh, those are awful. But at least it’s for a good cause, and not simply talentless masturbation like the “fashion” lines of some of these Hollywood dimwits.

    And, the haters are practically wetting themselves over the set of gallery pics that one at the top came from. OMGbodylanguage! Brad hates Ange! They’re breaking up! WTF. Go take a walk or something. Step away from the gossip pages.

  41. Tia C says:

    Meh. I don’t care for snakes. Or that fugly jewelry.

  42. sela says:

    RE: MOCA Photos and Video

    1. Clearly Damage Control
    2. Not their typical Damage Control with PDAs (PDsA?) where AJ does her wooden-arm ass grab and where BP has never looked fully comfortable or natural showing (or acting) his affection.
    3. The video shows BP make a split-second move to reject her ass grab but then like a trained monkey he ackwardly rubs her arm and then makes a move for her elbow to (maybe?) move her arm away. A very bizarre spot to end and/or edit out the rest of the video footage. It wasn’t a very advantageous moment to end the video from the photographer and MOCA event’s point of view in terms of good PR …. so someone made a decision somewhere and it seems hard to believe that JoliePitt and handlers were not a part of that decision.

    I get the sense that BP was not into playing “the game” anymore. Actually, they probably both are sick of “pretending” but Angelina Jolie knows she has more to lose because Brad Pitt will come out (unfairly) looking like the winner and she will be publically humiliated by the media and irrational, hateful people. If (and I mean IF they are split) I am sure they both recognize the utter negativity that would ensue, which would really destroy their lives and children’s lives. I think they care enough about their children to find alternative solutions.

    @firestarter – QVC and my grandma’s costume jewelry = )

  43. alex says:

    @firestarter – Good for you then lol

    back to work and the real world for me

  44. Charity is Chic says:

    Do these two ever go and have fun? Would it kill them not to be so pretentious all the time? How about a simple date night that does not include an evening gown, a starving orphan or a million cameras around?

  45. anneesezz says:

    She almost always looks annoyed or constipated….. I’m not sure which. Either way she always has something stuck up her butt.

    snoozefest story.

  46. viper says:

    EW the pendants looks like poop! Like those prank rubber poop gags. How unoriginal anyway, like I havent seen a snake before. I would have been more interested in a rose or mermaid/siren type of design. But this is Jolie we’re talking about, she’s a reptile lover. Fur scares her, which has always amused me. lol

  47. Munkey says:

    They look ridiculous.

  48. Cheyenne says:

    SageAdvice: posting a video of Brad awkwardly rubbing her upper arm isn’t convincing anyone of anything.
    ____________________________________

    What would it take to convince you? Do you need to see a video of them humping on the museum floor? Just curious.

  49. Firestarter says:

    @Cheyenne- Well, if we did need that kind of proof, I have no doubt you would be able to come up with it faster than their own managers could. : )

  50. Christina says:

    maybe she is their publicist???

  51. Munkey says:

    Christina, let’s hope so. Otherwise … yikes.

  52. Beth says:

    Charity hasn’t it occurred to you that going to an art exhibit is fun? Maybe they like staying at home with the kids or they are able to get away from the paps for a lunch or dinner. Nobody sees what Brad and Angelina do 24/7.

  53. fizXgirl314 says:

    since when do snakes tie themselves up like dog shit? I dig snakes but she could have seriously gone for a better pose… Otherwise, those are some special needs snakes :/

  54. Laura says:

    @Firestarter – You always make me laugh. I’m getting looks in my lecture hall now 🙂 You last post was genius.

    I dunno about this snake “jewelry” She seems more like the scorpion type to me.

    Okay, I’ll stop. Brad has also been on my bad/lame list ever since he fancied himself an architect and helped “design” a Dubai hotel. Ugh.

  55. Mairead says:

    They had better look spectacular in real life is all i can say.

    Design-wise they look like they released their inner 16-year old goth girl. 😐

  56. Firestarter says:

    @Laura- Aww shucks! Thanks. I try to add a little humor every so often! : )

  57. lisa says:

    Brad/Angie together and fine. 5 years and the same old same old. How many pictures of them have been analyzed to death. How many “they are so over’. They are faking for he camera, the kids, the brand.

    Whatever.. the funny part to me are the people on this thread having an orgasm as the thought of a break up. Now that is pathetic. If they stay together they do.. If they break up they do. Now how does that change anyone else’s life except them and their children. 5 years of these stories and they are right where they were and have always been Together. Now let’s see what happens. Just so insane how some people need this couple to break up to make their day. And some of you call their fans loons… Yeah right their fans are the crazy ones. Read some of these post and I think crazy has a different name.

  58. Cheyenne says:

    Okay, final thoughts on the body language debate:

    January 2005: Brad and Jennifer Aniston were photographed on some Caribbean island looking very passionate and romantic together. Later that same week they announced their separation.

    Late in 2005: Jennifer and Vince Vaughn are photographed looking very much in love. The next week Vince says it’s kaput.

    February 2009: Jennifer and John Mayer are photographed at the Academy Awards, arms around each other, looking very affectionate. Two weeks later, he throws her under a bus — for the second time.

    So much for body language analysis.

  59. Popcorny says:

    She looks like she was either just crying or is stoned. Trying too hard to compensate for something.
    Brad looks wiped out, tired and just not into the moment -but pretending to be.
    I’m going into my crystal ball to see the imaginary things that others sometimes claim to see … hmmmmm … Oh! -I think I see they just had a fight as they were getting ready, he wanted her to be straight for the event but she thought she’d get away with it using visine, maybelline and wax. He grabbed her hand and pulled her back out of the car, telling her she was embarrassing, she yanked it back and defiantly got back into the car, hand smarting and throbbing like a Flinstone injury. She promised profusely to a disgusted Brad, all the way over to the gallery, that she could pull it off.
    Let the pictures reflect he wasn’t, and isn’t, having it.

  60. Ursula says:

    Snake design, by a snake…oops, sorry, an artiste. Now that is novel.

    Watched the video, thanks Cheyenne, but is it supposed to have better body language? Because it also seems awkward, Pitt seems angry, Jolie, looks like, come on, it is for show, play up, it will not kill you darling.

    Now I wanna be a fly on the wall in their house.

  61. Firestarter says:

    Cheyenne- Why does everything have to lead back to Aniston with you?

    Who cares what Aniston was photographed doing.

    What does SHE have to do with this post?

    I missed where she was mentioned in this whole jewelry deal.

  62. crash2GO2 says:

    Popcorny: ROTFLMAO!

    They look uncomfortable in the video and photos. For whatever reason. My oh so humble opinion…

  63. daisy says:

    I work in the evenings,so my days are free,so I too multi-task.

  64. SageAdvice says:

    Firestarter, whenever a provable point is made about Chey Chey’s idols, she has to pull the classic Chey Chey deflection move and mention something, anything, about Jennifer Aniston as though she has anything to do with…well, anything. Notice there was no mention of how they did not, in fact, look awkward.

    The Brange looked awkward in that video. It doesn’t mean, *GASP* they’re breaking up!. It just means they had an awkward moment. Let it ride.

  65. Elle says:

    @Firestarter–so, nobody can talk about Aniston? Cheyenne was making a good point about body language not being reality. I don’t see what’s wrong with that? So, she’s not a fan and you are–big deal. Last post, you said her comments were hateful when they were just opinions? Just because she’s not a fan doesn’t mean she’s hateful. And, I never see you calling out the posters who say Jolie is evil, etc? Hmmm

  66. Firestarter says:

    @Elle- For starters, this post is about Jolie and Pitt, not about Aniston, Pitt and Jolie.

    Second- I am not a fan or either Angeline OR Aniston. I was at one time an admirer of Pitt’s until he shed his normal Missouri image and became a pretentious fool, taking on the personalities of each and every one of his romantic partners. Mind you, I started to dislike Pitt when he started dating Aniston, so I am not sure where you get the idea I am a fan of Anistons.

    With Cheyenne, it is EVERY post a mention of Aniston. WTF does that have to do with this at all? NOTHING! This is about Pitt and Jolie and jewelry, I don’t call out anyone when they are talking about the people the thread is about. When people talk about Pitt or Jolie in an Aniston thread, I do ask why they have to bring them into it.

    Bringing Aniston up in every thread with these two makes about as much sense as bringing Fishsticks Paltrow up would be. Aniston is part of Pitts past, just like Paltrow and all the other women he dated or was engaged to. I do not know why Aniston has to be broguht up all the time. Why not use his past with Paltrow and their body language? Why not use examples of his body language with Lewis or Givens? It makes the same amount of sense as Aniston, yet people cannot get over he married Aniston.

    Jeez! Just talk about the people in the post not everyone they have ever been involved with in their lives. Hey lets talk about the body language with Jolie and Billy Bob or Johnny Lee Miller! Hey how about the body language with Jolie and Jenny Shimizu. Get over the Aniston crap, No one cares. least of all Jolie, Pitt AND Aniston!

  67. Laura says:

    @Elle

    Firestarter’s points about Cheyenne have less to do with the “hateful” comments and who is a fan of who and more to do with the fact that when it comes to consistency, Cheyenne fails horribly.

    When a story is written about AJ and BP and it is something completely outlandish, Chey blasts anyone who would even consider that maybe they weren’t perfectly happy and calls the posters jealous and/or pathetic. she also blasts the magazine for making up lies

    But a story, even more outlandish than the hypothetical one above could come out about JA from the very same mag, ie, a marriage contract on the first date and you get posters like Chey calling her pathetic and saying “Aniston WOULD do that. She’s so paaaaaathetic!!”

    And back to the body language thing. The opposite: Brangelina looking “very passionate and romantic together” in a picture….if anyone were to say “You never know!!!!” and gave examples like Chey did, how do you think she would react? Not diplomatic saying “Yeah, maybe…..” but instead “You Jen-Hens have been waiting 5 years!!!! GIVE IT UP, ALREADY. THEY ARE HAPPY!!”

  68. Anak says:

    They are ridiculous. Who will believe that they have designed this uggly jewelry?

  69. SageAdvice says:

    @Elle: But with Chey Chey, “making a good point” is never what it’s about.

    She’ll bring up something negative about Aniston in every single Jolie/Pitt thread regardless of the subject matter.

    Yes, it’s a good point that body language isn’t everything which is absolutely true but why did she have to use Aniston’s previous relationships to make that point? Why not Jolie’s? Why not Pitt’s? They are the two subjects of the story. It would be plausible, of course, to bring up the body language of Pitt/Aniston on their vacation just before their divorce but other than that, Aniston’s relationships have zero bearing on what is going on in this post or even in the comments.

  70. Chelsea9018 says:

    I find it hilarious. Snake jewellery designed by TWO SNAKES themselves. They need to slither back under their rocks and stop hiding behind self-serving charity acts.

  71. Elle says:

    I don’t see why you guys are so riled up? And, you accuse Chey of many things you are all guilty of as well. Fire–I’m not sure that I believe you’re not a fan, as you have been highly critical of anyone who mentions Aniston. 5 emotional paragraphs and you’re not a fan? Hmm I, for one, enjoy Chey’s posts. I know she’s a fan but it would be boring without her. Live + let live

  72. Wholesome 1 says:

    I like the jewelry- especially the gold pendant.

  73. sela says:

    Maybe Cheyenne is paid to diss Aniston. Maybe he/she is James Haven or Geyer Kosinski? 😉

  74. Laura says:

    @Elle

    In those 5 paragraphs the only thing you can argue is that you think Fire is a closet fan………that’s it? Nothing else she said made you see what her real point was? Huh.

    What about me? Do you have anything to say about what I SAID and the points that I brought up? Or is it hitting too close to the truth for a denial/response?

    My qualm was regarding mind-boggling way some stories are feverishly believed, while others (not a 1/4 as extreme) are not. It’s a question that has been posed many times on this site. But so far, no one has bothered to answer.

    For the record, I find the rumours about JA drunk dialing BP as believable as him drunk dialing her.

  75. mojoman says:

    I am too distracted by brad’s “billy the goat” goatee and Angie’s collarbone to notice the jewelry collection.

  76. Chris says:

    Reminds me too much of Slytherins or the serpent from the Garden of Eden.. I don’t know.. maybe I’m just not a fan of snakes.. they just seem.. inherently evil. If I wanted to help a good cause, I would’ve just gone with an awareness bracelet fundraiser.

  77. Definitely consider that that you said. Your favorite reason appeared to be on the net the easiest factor to be aware of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed whilst other folks consider issues that they plainly don’t recognise about. You controlled to hit the nail upon the top and outlined out the whole thing without having side-effects , other people could take a signal. Will probably be again to get more. Thank you

  78. Bert Struiksma says:

    It was uncertain whether Reed would be back next year even before he started missing FG’s. It was fairly certain that Reed would not be back next year before he missed a 26 yard chip shot. It’s not like he had four years left on his contract; he was already on the way out. Getting rid of him sooner rather than later gives us a chance to try and stop the bleeding, as it were.