Roman Polanski was taken to his Swiss chalet this morning

The chalet of Roman Polanski in Gstaad

This is Roman Polanski’s Swiss chalet, “Milky Way”. This is where Roman is right now, under “house arrest”. Last week, Polanski made a $4.5 million dollar bail, and the Swiss authorities agreed to allow him to stay at the chalet, provided he wear an ankle-monitor. It is in the chalet that Polanski will wait to hear if the United States’ extradition petition will be granted. But Roman, for one, is not prepared to accept extradition – his lawyer claimed several weeks ago that Roman “won’t accept” extradition. So my guess is that if and when extradition happens, “Milky Way” will have to be charged and taken by an international SWAT team, and Polanski will have to drugged and hog-tied. Which is a nice image, right?

Roman Polanski began his house arrest on $4.5 million bail Friday, rolling into the luxury resort of Gstaad in a police convoy to a warm welcome from his wife and children at his Alpine chalet.

Polanski persuaded Swiss authorities to end his two months of incarceration in a Swiss jail pending their decision on whether to extradite him to the U.S. in a 32-year-old sex case.

Polanski’s family had been waiting eagerly at the chalet, peeking out the windows to look for him as Swiss authorities worked out the last-minute details of his transfer. He has two children – Elvis, 9, and Morgane, 16 – with his wife, French actress Emmanuelle Seigner.

Just before 1 p.m., two police cars went straight into the garage, which has direct access to the house, then left twenty minutes later. Polanski was unseen behind the vehicles’ tinted windows, but police told The Associated Press that he was inside.

“Roman Polanski was today released from custody pending extradition and transferred to Gstaad, where he is under house arrest at his chalet,” the Swiss Justice Ministry said. “Polanski has undertaken not to leave his house and property at any time.”

The 76-year-old director won’t be allowed to leave the property while Switzerland decides whether to extradite him to the U.S. for having sex in 1977 with a 13-year-old girl.

Swiss officials say Polanski transferred the bail and deposited all identification and travel documents with the Zurich cantonal police. His house in Gstaad was fitted with an electronic monitoring system that will trigger an alarm if Polanski leaves the house or removes the tagging bracelet.

Polanski was wearing the monitor around his ankle Friday, said Folco Galli, spokesman for the Justice Ministry.

“As soon as he arrived, the electronic device was activated,” he told The Associated Press, adding that Polanski was free to speak to the press if he wished. “But this is for him alone to decide.”

An hour later, the Polanskis sent word to reporters that they had no intention of making a statement.

“Mr. Polanski and his wife just asked us to say they are not coming out,” said a security guard, who declined to give his name. “There is no point in waiting, so you can all leave.”
Police in gray-and-blue jackets and private security guarded his property. Red-and-white striped police security tape and a wooden fence marked out an area around the house that was closed to strangers.

Swiss authorities are still weighing the U.S. extradition request as well as arguments by Polanski’s lawyer not to send him to Los Angeles, Galli said. He said the decision was expected “in the next weeks,” but he could not say if it would happen this year.

In Los Angeles, prosecutors and defense lawyers declined to comment on the release.

“We’re not going to be making any comments about Mr. Polanski outside court while his extradition is pending in the Swiss courts,” said Sandi Gibbons of the Los Angeles District Attorney’s office. A spokeswoman for Polanski’s California legal team also said they would have no comment.

[From The Huffington Post]

What’s interesting to me is that Polanski can’t leave the “property”. Not the chalet, mind you, the “property”. This means that Polanski will be able to walk around outside on what are probably extensive grounds. Is anyone placing bets on whether Polanski runs again? Even though Polanski is one of Switzerland’s most high-profile detainees ever, I doubt they have people on the house constantly. I think he could easily slip away.

"Che Tempo Che Fa" - Italian TV Show

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

19 Responses to “Roman Polanski was taken to his Swiss chalet this morning”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Whitey Fisk says:

    Egads, he got the horrifying “Confined to Swiss Chalet” treatment. That’ll teach him.

  2. Firestarter says:

    LOL@Whitey- My thoughts exactly.

  3. gg says:

    The house looks small, but certainly not as small as a jail cell.

    I wonder how Mr. Playboy would feel if somebody drugged and raped his 16-year-old daughter?

  4. Lantana says:

    It’s probably too frozen to dig a tunnel this time of year. He might be stuck. Why do I think it’s a suicide waiting to happen? Except he may be too much of a megalomaniac to contemplate that…

  5. Lenore says:

    I realise there are legal definitions involved but I do wish the press would stop referring to him “having sex with a 13-year-old”.

    I know that the plea bargain saw him plead guilty to statutory rape, rather than defend against a more serious charge, but the terminology used by the press makes it seem like it was consensual, when it was anything but. (Chaps, just FYI, if a lady’s crying and asking you to stop and take her home, she is probably not enjoying what you’re doing to her.)

    I wish journalists would have the guts to use the word RAPE in describing his crimes, and maybe then people wouldn’t be hoarding this queasy sympathy for Polanski. Too many people still have the wrong impression of what he did and, like poor silly Whoopi, think it wasn’t really “rape-rape”.

  6. lilred says:

    Sure does look like roughing it to me. Not exactly punishment is it.

  7. Ellie says:

    I got $100 that he doesn’t last a week until he bails to France!

  8. Stella says:

    shouldn’t that article read:
    “for RAPING a 13-year-old girl in 1977.”

    NOT
    “for having sex in 1977 with a 13-year-old girl.”

    Nothing about that horrible police reports suggests that anything other than rape happened and I feel like this article makes it sound like it was consensual.

  9. MaiGirl says:

    I agree, Lenore. After reading what really happened, I was deeply angered. There is no question that he raped her, and it would have been rape even if she were an adult. This man is very sick and dangerously evil, mostly because he still seems to think he did nothing wrong.

    I, too, wonder how he would feel if someone raped his daughter in the way her raped Samantha. I also wonder, since he had had a relationship with Nastassia Kinski (sp?) when she was 15 and likes young girls, if he was able to stay appropriate in his own relationship with her.

  10. champagna says:

    as always money talks and bullshit walks! he is a vile and disgusting human being — well, thing, and the fact that he was ever allowed around women again without being castrated it a gdanged shame. His wife must be missing a few digits as well.

  11. Kathie says:

    This is just sickeningly like the “Spanish Inquisition” sketch from Monty Python..wherein the Inquisitors menace a little old Lady with torture devices such as a comfy chair and a fluffy pillow, only in this case Polanski is the menace.

  12. Trashaddict says:

    Why should he have to run? They already took the payoff, the SOB is going to get away with it. Art imitates life – the bastard is echoing the incestuous father character he created in Chinatown. If it weren’t so deeply disgusting, it would be pitifully laughable.

  13. smilelover says:

    For you Americans; the ground is solid stone, no digging! Second, it might be looking small, but has about 3.200 sq ft and costs about 6 million Euros. The town “Gstaad” is a ski town where only super rich people can afford to spent their holiday. If you have a house there, you are a winner. It’s a shame that Polanski is allowed to have “house arrest” there.

  14. Don Heckers says:

    Roman Polanski’s wife EMMANUELLE
    SEIGNER is HAPPY.
    Is there something wrong with being
    HAPPY ?
    Is it wrong to be married for 20 years ?
    You can’t attack EMMANUELLE SEIGNER for
    being in love with ROMAN POLANSKI.
    There are MANY PEOPLE who love and
    protect ROMAN POLANSKI.
    I Guess everybody must know that by now.
    Why is that ?
    BECAUSE WE LOVE ROMAN POLANSKI.
    And we are HAPPY for him.
    Nothing and nobody can change that.
    IF I WERE THE JUDGE in this case , i’d
    say that POLANSKI has to pay a million
    dollars to SAMANTHA GEIMER , because
    jailtime is not gonna make his victim
    happy.
    But BIG CASH is always welcome !

  15. Jag says:

    I don’t understand how a woman can stay married to a man that she knows drugged and raped a child, no matter how long ago it was.

    I seriously doubt Switzerland is going to let him be extradited back to the U.S.. He could run to France, certainly, but I don’t think that’ll be necessary now, which is sickening.

    The Matterhorn, and Switzerland in general, is so beautiful. I want to visit there again. /le sigh

  16. Yeahhedid says:

    He fucked her and he probably fucked Kinski, too. No secret this one liked’em young. The problem is he made Kinski a star and this one he didn’t. Mom got mad he tossed it away like yesterday’s trash and went after him. So who is worse? Mom(who is supposed to protect you) Or Mr. child molester?

  17. Popcorny says:

    Is it just me or does anyone else notice that Roman’s been staring, and gesturing, at Miley’s extended backside all weekend?
    Great article/photo positioning and selection -hilarious!

  18. Lenore says:

    Don Heckers:

    “Roman Polanski’s wife EMMANUELLE
    SEIGNER is HAPPY.
    Is there something wrong with being
    HAPPY ?
    Is it wrong to be married for 20 years ?
    You can’t attack EMMANUELLE SEIGNER for
    being in love with ROMAN POLANSKI.
    There are MANY PEOPLE who love and
    protect ROMAN POLANSKI.
    I Guess everybody must know that by now.
    Why is that ?
    BECAUSE WE LOVE ROMAN POLANSKI.
    And we are HAPPY for him.
    Nothing and nobody can change that.
    IF I WERE THE JUDGE in this case , i’d
    say that POLANSKI has to pay a million
    dollars to SAMANTHA GEIMER , because
    jailtime is not gonna make his victim
    happy.
    But BIG CASH is always welcome !”

    And all of this changes the fact that he committed rape and fled the country… how exactly?

    Look, I like some of Roman Polanski’s films. The Pianist was very moving. I’ve read interviews with him and he seems like a personable chap. I actually do believe the original judge, Rittenband if memory serves, was probably motivated at least partly by serving his own reputation. I also believe that poor Samantha Geimer’s life has been irreparably damaged, not just by the rape but by the callous treatment she has received, and continues to receive, in the press (being painted as a teenage harlot whose mother should have known better – an image Polanski’s own camp have quietly promoted). And I’m sure that Ms Seigner loves her husband, and I’m sure he’s been a good father to his children.

    None of which alters what Roman Polanski did.

    For the benefit of anyone who may one day require the protection of the American legal system, he must return to the US to face the appropriate prosecution for his crimes. If a new trial sentences him to time served, if a legally-registered appeal rules that Rittenband acted unlawfully, then fine. But let the courts judge him, and let judgement be carried out.

    To allow a man to rape and then to flee the country, and to let him get away with it because he’s had a hard life or enough time has passed or his wife loves him or WHATEVER JUSTIFICATION HIS SUPPORTERS CARE TO OFFER is an insult to anyone who has ever been raped. To say he ought not to be extradited is to say, “Hey, you, raped girl – it’s been a long time, who cares what you went through? Let it drop.”

    And yes, I am aware that Ms Geimer – who has all my sympathy – has expressed a desire herself to “let it drop”. But it is not simply for this one victim that Polanski should be tried. It is for the benefit all victims that this loophole be tied.

  19. Kitap says:

    Sitenizi Googleda arama yaparken buldum. Gercekten cok iyi bir site yapmsnz. Bundan sonrada sk sk sayfanz takip etmeye alacam.