Last week, Twihards were all in a tizzy, and they had issued a Twi-fatwa against Katy Perry. You see, Radar ran a couple of “exclusive” reports about how Robert “Sparkles” Pattinson and Katy Perry were getting “flirty” with each other at a mutual friend’s birthday party at the Dimples Supper Club in Burbank California. According to Radar’s reporting, “Rob and Katy only had eyes for each other. We observed them sitting face-to-face, touching foreheads and acting very flirty with each other. They were both giggling and Katy looked positively giddy!” A source said: “She brought him here before. Every time she comes he seems to follow.” There was lots of drinking (on his part) and smoking (on his part) and sketchy skintight outfits (on her part) and “Rob was getting an eyeful and he loved it!” And Katy and Sparkles left together… with other people (video here). After that, Katy and Sparkles went back to the Renaissance Hotel (once again, with other people) to party. Scandal!
So, anyway. Some people were all “What about Bella and Edward, SOB!” Perhaps Katy feared The Wrath of the Twihards, perhaps she just thought hooking up with Sparkles would ruin her rep, whatever it was, Katy is now denying the Sparkles hookup. Katy tweeted: “I don’t do vampires, I do Russell Brand.” Except, you know, she wrote it in twit-speak:
Relax, Kristen Stewart: Katy Perry is no Twi-hard, and she’s not hooking up with Robert Pattinson.
That’s the message Perry, 25, made loud and clear on Twitter Sunday in response to last week’s reports that she’s getting romantic with the New Moon superstar, 23.
“Read a bunch of yesterdays-news-BULLOCKS.” Perry Tweeted. “Ppl should know by now that I don’t do vampires, but I do, DO @rustyrockets,” she says, in a call out to current boyfriend Russell Brand. “Don’t get it TWISTED!”
Radaronline claimed that the singer and actor “got up close and personal” and “only had eyes for each other” during a Dec. 16 outing at Dimples Supper Club in Burbank, Calif.
Yet one of the club’s bouncers told UsMagazine.com of the group’s night out: “There was a big group and no one seemed to be romantic. They were just laughing and having a great time. [Pattinson] looked buzzed and happy.”
[From Us Weekly]
Hmm… who would you rather? Sparkles (he’s so sensitive!) or Russell Brand (he’s so smarmy!)? While I’ll admit that Russell is probably a better lover, Pattinson is way prettier, and after you got done making love, and Sparkles had a good cry afterwards (you know he does that), you could brush his hair and gossip. Sparkles for the win! In my book, anyway. Anyway, I do think Katy loves her Russell, and I think Sparkles lives his K-Stew. Katy and Sparkles are allowed to be friends, you know!
Katy Perry and Russell Brand going Christmas shopping in London on December 21, 2009. Katy at a Grammy event in LA on December 2, 2009. Robert Pattinson at a ‘New Moon’ screening on November 19, 2009. Credit for all: WENN
Team Neither. Both dudes could use a shave and a flea dip.
hahaha @MSat, a flea dip, pricelesss. Love it
sparkles over russell dirtypants anyday of the week. and i dont even dig on sparkles. also, katy perry is a tool. what is the proper term for a female who is a douchebag? douchebaguette? she’s like the female john mayer or something. and her look is just so goddam unoriginal and yet she seems to think she’s got interesting style. yeah, not so much.
@andrea. I think douchebag was originally used for women in the olden day.
I find Katy to be a contradiction in some ways.
Those living in the UK can correct me if I’m wrong, I think the correct word is bollocks, not bullocks as she used in her twitter post. Absolute rubbish, nonetheless.
@someone, I picked that up too. Unless she has a thing for male cows (not impossible), it’s bollocks. She’s a dickhead, either way, and someone should tell her that Sparkles isn’t actually a vampire, he just plays one.