Stylish Celebrity Escapism
Contributing Writers
May 18
'06
Jolie-Pitt baby pic deal: nearly $5 million


A deal has been struck for the first pictures of the anticipated Jolie-Pitt baby. Britian’s Daily Mirror is set to report that an unnamed publication has agreed to pay £2.6million for the pictures, with the proceeds to go to UNICEF. £2.6million pounds is $4.89 million dollars USD. That’s incredible.

According to the Daily Mirror, Ange and Brad have promised a US magazine the first pictures of the new bub.

A source revealed: “They’ve signed a £2.6million deal with a publication and the money will go to children’s charity UNICEF.

“Angelina’s very private but they figured they might as well use the opportunity of one child being born to help a lot of others.”

Meanwhile Pitt’s family says there’s no hard feelings about Angelina deciding to give birth in Africa, and that they honestly like her. If these quotes from Brad’s brother are geniune, the family does admit that Brad’s Mom still talks to his sore loser of an ex, Jennifer Aniston:

Reports were claiming the close-knit Pitt clan felt they’d been snubbed when their son, 42, and his 30-year-old missus Jolie suddenly moved to Paris and then Namibia.

But Brad’s brother Doug says the family are glued to the phone in America waiting for the news.

“We all want to help them get through the birth in any way we can,” Doug says. “We just want them to enjoy it and to know we’re all thinking of them.”

That’s not to say there’s no friction - Brad’s very unhappy that mum Jane is still close to his ex-wife Jennifer Aniston.

Doug said: “He feels mum should move on and cut the link. But mum’s in a difficult position, she has great affection for Jennifer…”

Doug revealed they were planning a trip to Paris for a “family vacation”, prompting speculation that Brangelina will return to the city after the birth.

That’s a phenomenal sum for some baby pictures, but it will be the most famous baby in the world.

The picture above is of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt impersonators and was run in NY Magazine. It must have sold plenty of copies even without the real thing.

Little Suri Cruise still hasn’t been seen by the press. Her pictures are worth a healthy sum, but surely not as much as the Jolie-Pitt baby.

Written by Celebitchy

Posted in Angelina Jolie, Babies, Brad Pitt, Brangelina, Good Causes

One Response to “Jolie-Pitt baby pic deal: nearly $5 million”

  1. it’s funny you mentioned Suri Cruise… I predict that when this baby is born, nobody will care to have pix of Suri Cruise in their magazines. I’m afraid it’s a bit of old news already. As to Brad’s mom, I can totally understand her predicament. What is she supposed to do? Cut Jen off? I’m blaming Jen for calling her former mother-in-law and badmouthing Angelina. She knows Jane will not hang up on her, she’s her former daughter-in-law, but Jennifer should know enough to only call for Christmas and maybe to wish her happy birthday and talk about HER life, not Brad’s life. This is a very unhealthy situation but isn’t it typical of Jen to make it all about her needs?

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

Recent Comments:
  • iecaonsr mchy: jbtd qblxjmgh cebuyzad onbhmxvc ejskvzl pvywf sltfxm
  • ThatBKChick: Just to think that the PUMA movement was waiting for this moment….only to have their dream go up...
  • Barbara: Exactly why is that “creepy”? Becuase the talented and funny Jonah Hill would stoop to dating an...
  • enchantress: If David Beckham was my neighbor I’d be falling all over myself waving at him too :mrgreen: Posh,...
  • enchantress: I don’t know why this is, and it’s totally off the subject, but something about her face has...
  • Ethan: The only thing that O has revealed is that she is supporting the advancement of women only when it comes to...
  • enchantress: Just the other day I turned on the T.V. and “Beetlejuice” was on - Gawd, Alec Baldwin HAS...
  • rottenkitty: Correction, Alec Baldwin’s career doesn’t go back to 1963 — it started in 1980. My bad.
 
 

Celebitchy is a celebrity gossip site written by several independent authors. The opinions of the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the site owner. All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Articles are based on rumor, conjecture, and published information in other sources. The site makes no claims that content is valid, accurate, or true. The site owner and the authors contributing to it will not be held liable for damages resulting from errors, omissions or falsehoods published on this site. It is not the site owner or the contributing authors' intention to defame or malign any particular group, religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual. The site owner is not responsible for content on linked or quoted sources. All comments made by visitors to the blog are the responsibility of their respective authors and are only sporadically monitored. The site owner will not be held liable for comments in any way.