Stylish Celebrity Escapism
Contributing Writers
Jan 22
'08
Author Andrew Morton claims Kidman saved placenta for Cruise’s test

Tom Cruise’s life seems to involve a lot more talk about placentas than the average man’s. Or the average woman’s, for that matter. Tom once famously claimed that he was going to eat Suri’s placenta after she was born. When people freaked out (Western cultures generally don’t partake in the birth products of their young) he claimed it was all a joke. But because it’s Tom Cruise, most of us know he doesn’t make a lot of jokes, and the crazier something sounds, the more likely he means it. Apparently Suri’s birth wasn’t the first time Cruise has made placenta demands. According to author Andrew Morton’s highly unauthorized Tom Cruise biography, Nicole Kidman saved some of the placenta after she had a miscarriage. Why? To prove to the media that it was indeed Tom’s.

Tom Cruise’s controversial biography stirs up more outrageous allegations. The book claims that Nicole Kidman reserved some of the placenta from her miscarriage to prove Cruise was the father of her child.

Andrew Morton, the author who is facing a $100 million legal threat from the Top Gun actor and the Church of Scientology for his unauthorized biography of the actor, asserts that Kidman saved the placenta to quash media speculations regarding the paternity of the unborn baby.

“They did try to start a family [but] she sadly had a miscarriage,” Morton says. “And because of all the questions over the father, she ordered that some of the placenta be saved in order to prove paternity - the fact that Tom Cruise was the father.”

[From All Headline News]

Sounds a little unbalanced right? Who do you think is more likely to be the brains behind that idea: Nicole Kidman – who seems relatively sane, if not a little over-botoxed, or Tom Cruise – who… does the crazy things Tom Cruise does? I can’t even begin to give a list of all the unbalanced things the man has done and said. I wouldn’t know where to start, and I certainly wouldn’t know where to stop. There are too many things to choose from. So who do you think masterminded the whole, “let’s save a chunk for the press” idea? Probably a couch jumper.

What I really want to know is – if Tom and Nicole did indeed save some placenta for the media – what in the world did they intend to do with it? Would they have actually given it to a reporter to have it tested? Would the reporter have had to ask, or would the Cruises have been polite enough to offer? How does that kind of discussion even work? I’m a pretty big nerd whose read a lot of etiquette books – I don’t think I’ve ever run across that situation. Leave it to Tom Cruise to chart new waters every day.

Written by JayBird

Posted in Andrew Morton, Nicole Kidman, Tom Cruise

Pages: 1 2 3 4

On-Page Comments are closed.

Add a comment in pop-up window
(for posts before 4/21/08)
On April 21, 2008, comments were moved from the pop-up Haloscan format onto the page. Older posts still use the Haloscan comments for discussions, and you are welcome to comment there. All new posts use on-page commenting.

Recent Comments:
  • pippipcheerio: I don’t know why this is, and it’s totally off the subject, but something about her face...
  • Ethan: The only thing that O has revealed is that she is supporting the advancement of women only when it comes to...
  • enchantress: Just the other day I turned on the T.V. and “Beetlejuice” was on - Gawd, Alec Baldwin HAS...
  • rottenkitty: Correction, Alec Baldwin’s career doesn’t go back to 1963 — it started in 1980. My bad.
  • Ethan: “Obama is Oprah’s Senator, she lives in Chicago. She’s followed his career and has voted for him...
  • Pamela: Kendra is my favorite!! She’s actually acting like she’s got a personality and being herself. So...
  • J: PS. I can’t believe some posters are so “sexist” on this blog. People should vote for a woman...
  • J: Even Oprah seems to make a political choice by not inviting Sarah Palin to her program, so what? Everyone is...
 
 

Celebitchy is a celebrity gossip site written by several independent authors. The opinions of the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the site owner. All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Articles are based on rumor, conjecture, and published information in other sources. The site makes no claims that content is valid, accurate, or true. The site owner and the authors contributing to it will not be held liable for damages resulting from errors, omissions or falsehoods published on this site. It is not the site owner or the contributing authors' intention to defame or malign any particular group, religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual. The site owner is not responsible for content on linked or quoted sources. All comments made by visitors to the blog are the responsibility of their respective authors and are only sporadically monitored. The site owner will not be held liable for comments in any way.