'06
Rachel Weisz had a baby boy, but didn’t reveal any details other than the fact that he’s out now:
Mother, father (Darren Aronofsky), and child are healthy and happy, according to the rep.
Weisz, 35, is engaged to Brooklyn-born Requiem For a Dream director Aronofsky. This is the first child for the couple, who are based in New York.
Best wishes to Weisz and Aronofsky, and we hope they pick a non-traumatizing name for their little one. We’re sure to see the baby much sooner than non-existent Suri.
Here are some pictures of Weisz taken recently. [via]
Written by Celebitchy
Posted in Babies, Rachel Weisz
5 Responses to “Rachel Weisz has a baby boy”
-
I was already wondering when she’d finally give birth, it seemes like she’s been pregnant for ages ^^
I hope the little baby boy is fine, congratulations to the couple!
-
I think it’s going to have a nice, old-fashioned name too. they seem like a very grounded couple.
-
I agree. I see a similar name to Gwen Stefani’s baby - “James Kingston” would fit perfectly for Rachel Weisz’ boy as well =)
-
Angelika for some reason I thought “Kingston” was Stefani’s baby’s first name. Ok I double-checked and it is “Kingston James,” not “James Kingston.” I like it better the way you have it though, it sounds more normal.
Morning Mess: Mischa knows who wears the pants in her family
• Mischa Barton swears at her mother and calls her names in a hotel hallway. But hell, guess who is paying for that hotel room? [Bricks and Stones] • Congratulations to Rachel Weisz on her baby boy, and because…
Report this comment as spam or abuse