Comments on: Sarah Jessica Parker is a narcissist, a workaholic & a fake feminist

By: Amanda

Amanda — Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:30:35 +0000

Okay seriously people CALM down, I HIGHLY doubht she left the twins for two whole months and didn’t see them a SINGLE time ever! Sure she did, the magazine just doesn’t say that. Of course she saw them, SJP is to devoted of a mother to go that long without seeing her kids. I’m sure she flew home to NY to see them. There are far to many paparazzi candids of her in NY during breaks between filming the movie. As someone else said there is NO way she could have gotten out of the SATC 2 contract no matter what, they didnt let Liam Neeson quit Chloe when his wife died. SJP had signed the contract for SATC 2 a year or more before the twins were concieved via IVF with the surrogate.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Dannni

Dannni — Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:31:00 +0000

Seriously, you have to compare this to Kim Cattrell’s front page story in Chatelaine this month. What different women!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Delicious

Delicious — Thu, 15 Apr 2010 07:50:13 +0000

If it weren’t for SITC, I could care less about her. She has all the appeal of a white athletic sock or the scent of iceberg lettuce.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Scarlet Vixen

Scarlet Vixen — Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:59:41 +0000

I’ve always been pretty neutral on SJP–thought that she was a good mom, wife, etc. but totally annoying on SATC (she was my least fave character by far). But, I have completely changed my mind on the good mom thing. Shame on her for buying those beautiful babies then deserting them for months! As a mom, I felt so completely guilty when I had to leave my 6mo old for 5 days, let alone months! And, it’s NOT okay because her husband is at home–at this age every moment together is essential for long-time bonding. Those girls are always going to feel distant from her, and probably instinctively know she’s not really their ‘mom.’ She’s an exec producer on SATC–she could have worked the schedule or brought them with her or something. Leaving infants for months at a time (especially after BUYING them for pete’s sake) is horrible parenting.

PS There’s nothing wrong with lotion at bedtime. Lavendar lotion combined with gentle touch can be a great relaxation technique for kids.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Allie

Allie — Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:02:45 +0000

While the word “hate” is a very strong one, that’s Kaiser’s opinion. I just don’t feel hatred, sure, there’s loads of things, I don’t care for, but I don’t hate them either.
I for one, enjoy this blog. I am puzzled by the outlash over Kaiser’s outlook on this subject. That’s her opinion people. Just like you have your own opinion. Doesn’t mean anyone’s right or wrong, it’s just how you look at things. If you’re truly that upset over what she said, then you don’t have to read this blog, now do you?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: karie

karie — Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:55:35 +0000

@#70. Have you thought for a minute that the comment was a joke? It sounded like a joke to me. I think it’s very easy to skewer something someone says and read the nastiest intentions into it(like Kaiser did with SJP placing lotion on her kid!). Seriously, where is all of this hatred coming from? Is it jealousy that she has this life that people wish they could afford? It just seems so mean-spirited and unwarranted. She hasn’t said anything even mildly offensive to me. I mean there’s so many other celebs out there who are really bad. And, picking on her looks makes y’all really shallow. How are you guys any better than her (narcissistic, shallow, spoiled, etc)? What makes you any better? I don’t get it.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Sandy

Sandy — Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:10:23 +0000

Thank you Diamond Skylace for pointing out the obvious…I don’t get it when people bash someone up for being unattractive….some of the comments are really mean…

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Jag

Jag — Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:05:10 +0000

What I got out of that interview is that she feels so proud for doing most of the things that normal parents do ALL of, everyday. She’s delusional.

And this really, really bothers me:

SJP says she and Matthew wanted more kids because “I didn’t want [James Wilke] to have to shoulder the burden of us—later in life—by himself.”

So they didn’t have more children because they love kids and want to raise wonderful people. They had children for the sole reason of not wanting their only child to have to care for them by himself. But instead, having the three children to care for them in their old age. Not thinking about the children – only thinking of themselves and who would care for them. Why didn’t they set up a trust with a home-nurse company instead? Those poor kids!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: huh

huh — Wed, 14 Apr 2010 04:29:32 +0000

crikey – who gives a rats hiney? where’s Jesse James hiding out these days, anyway…..

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Camille

Camille — Wed, 14 Apr 2010 04:07:53 +0000

If you swapped out SJP’s name in the title of this post and put in ‘Jennifer Aniston’ instead, I wouldn’t have argued.
SJP and JA are completely interchangeable to me- their films, and even their looks remind me of each other. Both do awful rom-coms that would be better off not being made (or at least have better actors in them), and they even go up for the same parts (SJP was up for The Bounty Hunter LOL)- just think it could have been Gerry B and SJP groping each other on the red carpet LOL.
Anyway I think this post was spot on, well said Kaiser. The SATC franchise should have died when the series did.

Report this comment as spam or abuse