Uma Thurman has given birth! Uma and her baby-daddy/boyfriend Arpad Busson welcomed a baby girl yesterday in New York (I think it was NYC). They haven’t released a name yet. The little girl joins her half-siblings Maya (13) and Levon (10), the two children Uma had with Ethan Hawke. I’m predicting a relatively normal name for this little girl… something kind of boho, but not crazy. Like Summer Arabella Busson or something.

Uma’s a mama again! Uma Thurman gave birth to a baby girl on Sunday, a source confirms exclusively to Us Weekly. No other info was immediately available.

It’s the the third child for the 42-year-old Oscar nominee, who has two children — Maya, 13, and Levon, 10 — with ex-husband Ethan Hawke, and her first with financier beau Arpad Busson.

The Smash guest star and Busson, 49, called off their engagement in 2009, but reunited last year.

“Uma was definitely not planning on having another kid. It was a surprise,” a source told Us, which first broke new of Thurman’s pregnancy back in February. “But she’s over the moon about it, very excited.”

Thurman and her daughter-to-be were feted at a small baby shower in NYC May 31 thrown by her half-sister Taya Thurman. Among the two-dozen guests at the baby pink-elephant themed bash were Thurman’s Smash costars Debra Messing and Will Chase.

Thurman’s ex-husband Hawke has also become a parent again following their 2004 divorce; the actor, 41, and second wife Ryan are parents to young daughters Clementine, 3, and Indiana, 11 months.

[From Us Weekly]

Congrats to the happy family! Hopefully they’re happy about it, because I really do think this pregnancy was a complete surprise. Uma announced her pregnancy earlier this year, after there were some suspicious blind items that may or may not have been about Uma’s early pregnancy-partying. Uma was also photographed with a wine glass full of some light liquid back in March, when she was on vacation in St. Bart’s with Arpad and her kids. Hopefully, the baby girl is perfectly healthy and we’ll find out the name soon enough.

Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.

I keep getting mixed up about Kelsey Grammer and his wife Kayte. They got married last year, correct? And then renewed their vows this year. And then there was the pregnancy – their first pregnancy ended in a miscarriage but then Kayte got knocked up again… which I kept forgetting. I’m sorry for letting you down, gossip-wise. I do try to pay attention, Kelsey Grammer is just some kind of gossip black-hole for me. Anyway, Kayte gave birth on Friday. They had announced months ago that they were expecting twins but it seems like one of the babies died in utero, which is just sad.

Even as they celebrate the newest addition to their family, Kelsey and Kayte Grammer are mourning the loss of her twin.

The couple of two years reveals that the Friday morning arrival of Kelsey and Kayte’s new daughter, Faith Evangeline Elisa, was bittersweet.

“We are thrilled,” the couple tells Us Weekly in a statement about their baby girl, who weighed in at 6lbs, 2 oz. at birth. “Mother and child are in excellent health. We were ecstatic earlier this year, when we announced that Kayte was carrying twins. Tragically, we lost the little boy shortly thereafter,” the couple says. “This was not something we cared to make known publicly at the time. It was unspeakably painful and we know that people will understand our desire to keep the news private then, as we know they will respect our privacy in this matter now.”

Still, the Grammers — who married in February 2011 — say they’re focused on moving forward from their tragic loss.

“A glorious birth with a lingering sadness is ours today. We choose to celebrate the life that has been given us,” they share. “We proudly announce Faith to the world today looking forward to the days ahead and the children yet to come.”

[From Us Weekly]

The children yet to come…? Kayte is going to keep on having babies, apparently. He already has an adult daughter and two children with Camille. Eh, whatever, I’m not going to harp on about it. As for the little girl’s name… it sounds very Southern to me, probably because “Faith” is my mom’s name and she’s super-Southern. I think Evangeline is pretty, as is Elisa. But my first thought was “This little girl’s initials are F.E.E.G.” “Feeg” is just a cool word to sound out… “Feeeee-eeeg.” Anyway, congrats to the happy family!

PS… I like the fact that Kayte wore flip-flops throughout her pregnancy. But this busted red shade of hair color needs to go!

Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.

Maybe I’m showing my age (better than showing my ass), but when I was growing up, all of the younger celebrities that I admired were childless. It was part of the deal those days – 20-something actresses and singers weren’t all that interested in settling down and having babies. I can’t imagine being 13 years old today and looking up to someone like Kristen Stewart (who is 22), and hearing about how she wants a baby. I’m not getting all judgmental and “celebrities should be role models” about it, I just can’t ever remember being a kid and admiring some really young celebrity who was into babies. It’s a zeitgeist thing – Generation X was all about having babies in their 30s. Generation Whatever (what is this generation called? I forget – but Generation Whatever is a great name!) is all about teen pregnancies and getting married at 21 and that stuff. Anyway, Us Weekly says that Kristen Stewart is all about babies. SPARKLE BABIES.

Life imitating art! Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson were bitten by the baby bug while playing parents in November 16′s The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 2. On set, Stewart, 22, and Pattinson, 26, connected with 11-year-old Mackenzie Foy, who plays their half-vampire, half-human daughter, Renesmee.

In rare unguarded moments for the fiercely private couple, they let themselves imagine life as parents. “They would talk about how they would raise their own children,” a set source tells Us Weekly. “Kristen would say, ‘Well, I’d never do this or that.’ Sometimes it would start off as a joke, but you knew they were really thinking about it.”

And, when the couple — who has been together for three years — attended a friend’s wedding on June 23, they seemed more interested in what comes after marriage: the baby carriage.

“Kristen was talking to a pregnant guest and told her that she would love to have a baby with Rob,” says the source. “She thought it was so cool — at one point she touched the woman’s belly to feel the baby kick.”

Pattinson, for his part, has long known that Stewart is the mother of his future children.

“He is over-the-moon in love with Kristen,” says a Twilight source. “For him, she’s The One, so it’s just a matter of when they decide to have kids.”

[From Us Weekly]

This seems suspiciously well-timed to go along with the early stages of Breaking Dawn Part 2’s promotion, sure. But it could also be for real. I’ve always said – it will be interesting to see what happens with Kristen and Rob once the franchise is over. At this point, I do think they’ll stay together for another year or so afterwards, but after that… God knows.

And can we please stop talking about Sparkles and Kristen as if they’d ever do the film of 50 Shades of Grey? I hate to put it in these terms, but both of them are “too good” for that project. Incidentally, both Kristen and Sparkles got questions about 50 Shades while at Comic-Con, and they’re responses were of the “JESUS TAKE THE WHEEL” variety. Sparkles was asked what he would do if a copy of 50 Shades was right in front of him, and he said, “I would just sit there and lick the pages.” When Kristen was asked if she, Sparkles and Taylor Lautner have a 50 Shades book club, she said “That would be disgusting.” And back to the casting stuff – people, please. It’s going to end up being cast straight out of the CW. No actor of any kind of serious profile wants this mess. Stop mentioning Michael Fassbender or Ryan Gosling or anyone of that caliber. It’s going to be someone like Ian Somerhalder or Jared Padalecki (I had to look him up).

Photos courtesy of WENN.

And now for another chapter in our ongoing saga, “P0rn For Women: The Chris Hemsworth Edition”. In today’s episode, we’re looking at new photos of Chris, his wife Elsa and their eight-week-old daughter India Rose out and about in Santa Monica yesterday. As you can see, Chris seems to be the Official Baby-Holder when the family is out in public. As you can see, Chris Hemsworth’s arms are so deliciously epic, his baby girl basically looks like a tiny doll. I do love the tender way he’s carrying India – you can tell that it’s not just for the cameras. This is a man who dotes on his baby publicly and privately. Aussie men are just… the best.

I have to wonder – how is it that Chris and Elsa keep getting pap’d so consistently? Are they going to become the new Garner-Afflecks? Only somehow different, because judging by the comments, most of you can’t stand Elsa Pataky and most of you flat-out adore Chris. So will this be his new thing? He gets pap’d all the time for the Arms & Babies Show? Fortunately, Chris does have a real career – he’s got sequels to Thor, Snow White and the Huntsman and The Avengers in the works. Plus several more actions flicks. I fully expect Chris to be considered A-list at any moment, and part of that billing will be his “buff, wholesome, family man” image. These photos are doing wonders.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

Did I call it or what? I’ve been saying for a month now: “I wonder when Mark Wahlberg’s wife is going to get pregnant again?” Turns out, she was pregnant this whole time. Star Magazine reports this week that Rhea Durham is pregnant yet again… with the couple’s FIFTH child. Allegedly, she’s still in her first trimester.

It appears five children may be the charm for Mark Wahlberg and Rhea Durham! A source tells Star Rhea is pregnant with another child.

“She just found out in May and is thrilled,” says the insider. The 34-year-old former model and her hubby, 41, started dating in 2001 and got married in 2009. The happy couple already have a full house with Ella, 8, Michael, 6, Brendan, 3, and Grace, 2, but they’re making room for more.

“She’s going into her third month,” adds the source. Mark, who was the youngest of nine children, knows a thing or two about being a part of a big family.

[From Star Magazine, print edition]

As I said, I think this is perfectly possible because… you know, Rhea seems like she’s constantly pregnant. I can’t believe she’s only 34 years old and could be pregnant with her fifth biological child! Some women just have an easy time with it, and it seems like Mark is really happy with a big family, so good for them. Maybe with the fifth child, Rhea will finally get that platinum AmEx she’s had her eye on. I guess I should mention that Gossip Cop has a denial – but it’s a denial from an unnamed source close to the couple. Which, to me, carries just as much weight as Star’s report. My verdict: Rhea is totally knocked up again.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

As we discussed on Sunday, Sienna Miller reportedly gave birth over the weekend. Sienna and Tom Sturridge didn’t officially announce their pregnancy or the birth of their child – although Sienna confirmed the pregnancy to Vogue UK when she was about six months along – and we have yet to have any kind of “official” statement about the birth. So all of this is very “alleged” and “reportedly”. Anyway, Us Weekly claims that (I was right) Sienna gave birth to a baby girl. And now E! News has the scoop on the baby name! Marlow Sturridge, anyone?

Sienna Miller is a brand-new mom! The 30-year-old Factory Girl star and fiancé Tom Sturridge welcomed a daughter, their first child together, in London over the weekend, E! News has confirmed. And we can exclusively reveal that the little girl’s name is…

Marlow!

How very Chandleresque of them.

Miller and Sturridge, who got engaged in Paris over the Christmas holiday, have not released any other details about their new arrival, which was first announced by Us Weekly.

The actress did address her expectant status in British Vogue back in March, saying, “I’m feeling fine…It’s all progressing nicely and it’s very exciting.”

Miller hinted that she would be playing it close to the bump. “I’m under strict instructions not to say anything as it would completely defeat the point of everything I’ve tried to achieve in the last eight years,” she said.

[From E! News]

This definitely seems like a trend with both celebrity moms and non-celebrity moms – pulling names from Old Hollywood or names that belong in some kind of noir. Harlow, Marlow, Lana, these are names that scream “Old Hollywood” to me. True, Marlow could be a family name for Tom or Sienna. But probably not. It’s probably just a name they liked, and they’ll call the baby girl Marly or something. Marly Sturridge does sound cute.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet and WENN.

It’s baby time! I’ve been expecting this for a while – all of the knocked up celebrity women are going to be giving birth, all within a few days/weeks of each other. Over the weekend, it was Sienna Miller and now Kourtney Kardashian. You should keep your eye on Drew Barrymore too – I suspect she’ll be giving birth shortly. Anyway, Kourtney and Scott Disick welcomed their second child together on Sunday, according to E! News. It was a little girl, and they named her Penelope Scotland Disick. Hm.

Look out, world: there’s an adorable new Kardashian to keep up with now! Kourtney Kardashian and Scott Disick have welcomed their second child—and first daughter—E! News has exclusively learned.

The baby girl was born early Sunday in Los Angeles at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and joins big brother Mason in the ever-expanding Kardashian-Disick household. So how did the birth go down? And, most importantly, what’s the cutie pie’s name?

Let’s say hello to Penelope Scotland Disick.

“Scott and I are overjoyed to welcome our precious angel Penelope Scotland Disick into our lives. We are forever blessed. Mommy and baby are resting comfortably,” Kourtney tells E! News.

The 33-year-old E! star had an all-natural birth, and her new mini-me tipped the scales at 7 pounds, 14 ounces.

“It was a great. She had an easy delivery,” matriarch Kris Jenner tells us. “[Penelope] is so cute. She looks just like Mason. She’s so beautiful. We are so happy.”

As it happens, this has been one highly anticipated birth (complete with a headline-grabbing false alarm), and not just among the fans. Kourtney and Scott announced the news of the impending stork delivery last November, and revealed that they were expecting their first daughter in February of this year (son Mason turned the big 0-2 in December).

In May, the family—along with Kim Kardashian’s beau, Kanye West—celebrated the baby-to-be with a femme-fueled, pink-themed baby shower. As for the million-dollar question: as Mason’s birth was must-see TV, are the proud new parents going to once again share with fans the miracle of life?

“I don’t know,” Kourtney said on the Tonight Show a few weeks ago. “We’re gonna film it again ourselves, and honestly, my experience last time was so peaceful and calm and everything you don’t see in the movies. And I really wanted to share that with people so they knew it doesn’t have to be a crazy screaming session.”

This time around, we’ll have to wait and see. While Kourtney said she and Scott planned on filming the birth, they would decide after the fact if they were going to go public with the footage. And something tells us that’s not their biggest priority at the moment.

[From E! News]

Well, congrats. I don’t hate the name Penelope at all. As for “Scotland” – eh. It’s just a middle name, and I guess it was just to have “Scott” somewhere in there. Penelope Disick? Penny Disick? That’s kind of cute. My mom – who watches the Kardashian shows – says that Scott has changed for the better over the past year, and that Kourtney has turned into an even bigger a—hole (“like her mother,” my mom says). I have to admit, I’m kind of surprised that Scott has stuck around and I’m kind of surprised that Kourtney hasn’t kicked him to the curb by now. And now there’s another Kardashian girl in the mix! Mother of God.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Here are some new photos of Kimberly Stewart and her nearly one-year-old baby girl Delilah. Can you believe the baby turns one year old in August? And we’ve barely had any candid photos of her – this is the first time in months that Kimberly (and Delilah) have been photographed. I do have to give Kimberly some credit – she’s stayed much more low-key than I was expecting, not only throughout her pregnancy, but through this first year of Delilah’s life.

We’ve never seen photos of Benicio del Toro with his daughter, and I don’t even know if he even spends any time with her at all. Kimberly told Hello Magazine last year that “The whole family, including Benicio, was at the hospital and my mom and Benicio were in the delivery room with me. Benicio’s very involved; he and Delilah have a very special bond.” I tend to think that’s a lot of wishful thinking on Kimberly’s part – there were rumors that she and Benicio were just hooking up casually for about a month when she got pregnant, and Kimberly thought Benicio was going to fall in love with her or something. When really, he barely cares.

Anyway, I think Delilah is a little cutie – as she gets older, I think she looks more like Kimberly than Benicio, although Kimberly claims, “She definitely looks like her dad, but she has my legs and eye color.” The other woman in these photos is Alana Stewart, Kimberly’s mom and Rod Stewart’s ex-wife. So… three generations of Stewart girls. Nice.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet and PCN.

Sienna Miller has given birth! Only we don’t know exactly when or the sex of the baby or what Sienna named it. Us Weekly is still running the story as a huge “exclusive” although they don’t have confirmation from Sienna or from the baby-daddy, Tom Sturridge. Still, I tend to believe Us Weekly probably has it right. They were the outlet to correctly predict that Sienna was knocked up in the first place, so I guess they have sources close to Sienna – or Sienna’s rep is just close to someone at Us Weekly:

And baby makes three! Sienna Miller and her fiance Tom Sturridge welcomed their first child over the weekend in London, a source confirms exclusively to Us Weekly. Details on the baby’s gender, name and weight were not available. The British duo have been dating for over a year and debuted signs of their engagement — Miller’s dazzling diamond engagement ring — in mid-February.

After remaining mum about her pregnancy for several months, the actress, 30, finally opened up to British Vogue in April.

“Even though I’m under strict instructions not to say anything as it would completely defeat the point of everything I’ve tried to achieve in the last eight years,” the resolutely private actress expressed to the mag. “I’m feeling fine…It’s all progressing nicely and it’s very exciting.”

Despite the couple’s silence about their new addition to their family, Miller and Sturridge, 26, made no hesitation in stepping out in public on several celebratory occasions.

In May, the couple stole some time away in Portofino, Italy for a babymoon. A week later, they got decked out to celebrate Sturridge’s BFF Robert Pattinson’s 26th birthday at Gordon Ramsey’s restaurant in London, England.

[From Us Weekly]

My gut tells me Sienna had a girl. But I could totally be wrong, who knows? I hope we get some kind of announcement or confirmation, but don’t hold your breath for it – Sienna has grown increasingly more private over the past few years, and while she’s still got the heart of a famewhore, she has been doing better about keeping her mouth shut about her personal life.

Guesses for the godparents for Baby Miller-Sturridge? I’m saying Robert Pattinson for godfather and Keira Knightley for godmother. Keira and Sienna are tight – and Tom and Rob are BFFs. Sienna will not make Kristen Stewart the godmother, mark my words, Twihards.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Jennifer Garner and Ben Affleck welcomed their son, Samuel Garner Affleck, back at the end of February. Since she gave birth, Jennifer has been following her normal mom-routine with the two older kids, Seraphina and Violet, and the paparazzi have been following them like always. But in that time, we haven’t really gotten a good look at Samuel. Jen and Ben have never sold photos of their babies to a magazine, so I wasn’t expecting a People Mag cover or anything, but for the girls, Jennifer always made sure that the paparazzi got free candid photos of the babies soon enough (and on a nearly daily basis after that).

Anyway, as CB was discussing yesterday, the Garner-Afflecks were out and about for the 4th of July, and the girls were in their patriotic best, and Samuel even came out for some of the festivities. Some photo agencies managed to score photos of Samuel on the Fourth – we did not. You can see those pics here. So… these photos of Jennifer and Samuel on the 5th (yesterday) are not “Baby’s First Candids”. But it’s still nice that Jennifer made sure that some other photo agencies got some grainy photos of Samuel. He looks like… a baby. I can’t really tell who he looks like at this point or if he even HAS dimples.

As for Ben and Jen… sources claim that Ben really wants another baby and he’s trying to “convince” Jennifer to go for a fourth. I kind of think they should just stick with three! TOO MANY DIMPLES.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.