A few minutes ago I clicked on this Us Weekly story because I thought the jump photo was Lindsay Lohan. I was SO wrong. It’s Ali Lohan, looking very… boobtastic. Now, we don’t have access to the photo that Us Weekly is using, in which Ali Lohan’s suddenly large rack seems like the only thing in frame, but we do have these other photos from today – Ali and Dina going to visit Lindsay in jail.
For the most part, Ali has been wearing baggy clothes and hiding her face when she and her mom visit Lindsay. A day ago, I thought that Ali was trying to avoid the cameras because she had been crying. But now I’m wondering if she was post-surgery, and this is her big debut, in a tight white tank, of course. Would you put it past Dina to let her 16-year-old daughter get implants? Nope. Dina probably tried to get her in to see the plastic surgeon two years ago.
Of course, since Ali is so young, her boobs could have just come in naturally. I believe Lindsay’s boobs are natural, so maybe they just got good boob genes. But in that Us Weekly photo, they look jacked and plastic. What do you think? God, she looks so much like Lindsay in these photos.
UPDATE: Here’s a photo of Ali in the beginning of July – pretty flat profile, eh?
Ordinarily, I don’t really care about Audrina Patridge. But then I saw these photos, where Audrina was spectacularly hammered in London on Tuesday night, into Wednesday morning. Her eyes are going berserk! And her drunk tittays need some help. If you couldn’t tell by the “Inflate Here” nozzle, those things are fake, fake, fake. And it’s a really terrible boob job too! They’re got that Tori Spelling anorexic-chest-cavity, floating-implant thing happening. So gross.
Funny story – normally, whatever Spencer Pratt says about anything, I can forget almost as soon as I read it. But it’s always stuck in my mind that he publicly bashed Audrina for what he deemed her “Tijuana t-ts”. And now I have that stuck in my head whenever I see her. Just thought I’d share.
Anyway, yes, these are photos of Audrina’s wonk eyes and wonk boobs and general wonk demeanor out and about in London. She was doing some event for the British broadcast of The Hills, I guess. Apparently they got her to hostess a pool party at the Haymarket Hotel, after which Audrina continued to party at Mahiki, which I only know about because Prince Harry and Prince William like to party there. Trendy!
What did Blake Lively wear to Comic-Con? Satin harem pants and a blouse that shows off most of her breasts, of course. The nerds are definitely going to be seeing The Green Lantern now. Sure, they were excited about seeing it before, but now they know that Blake’s amazing (purchased?) boobs will be heavily featured. Ryan Reynolds looks okay too, I guess. Is it just me, or does his skin always look funky in candid photos? I think he fake-bakes, and it looks especially weird on him. Plus, he was making a lot of dorky faces, probably trying to fit in with the nerds.
Ryan Reynolds says he took the title role in “Green Lantern” to play a hero that can “throw a punch, tell a joke and kiss a girl.”
The actor, along with castmates Blake Lively, Peter Sarsgaard and Mark Strong and director Martin Campbell, presented a clip from the film at Comic-Con Saturday for some 6,000 ecstatic fans, many of whom camped out overnight for a chance to see the presentation.
Campbell says the 3-D movie blends realistic action with humor and an otherworldly trip to the planet Oa, home of the Green Lanterns. He added that while the hero’s costume is “a work in progress,” his cinematic story is set: He is joined by his fellow Green Lanterns for a face-off against Parallax, whom Reynolds describes as “the physical manifestation of fear in our movie.”
The clip showed Reynolds as Hal Jordan, who, after a fight with street thugs, takes the Green Lantern oath and uses his new powers to blow them away. Reynolds recited the oath for the Comic-Con crowd, which rewarded him with cheers.
The cast seemed to embrace the Comic-Con energy, and revealed which characters they’d dress up with if they could walk the convention floor. Reynolds would go as a Wookie because he likes to “be cute and dangerous.” Lively would dress as Harry Potter and Sarsgaard would go as Captain America. Strong said he’d dress as his “Green Lantern” character, Sinestro.
DC Comics chief Geoff Johns hinted that other Green Lantern films, and a Justice League movie, could follow: “The success of ‘Green Lantern’ will lead the charge for everything DC does.”
Damn, it sounds like they’re really putting the future of comic book franchises on Ryan’s shoulders. Can he hack it? I don’t know. But I was reading some additional ocverage, and it really does sound like he was selling it, hard. He even name-dropped his famous wife, telling the audience that what with ScarJo playing The Black Widow in Iron Man 2, “We’ve had some strongly worded dinners… we’ve probably got a lot more comic books lying around than your average married couple.”
He also did this for a very young fan… just wait, your heart will melt a little:
Here are some more photos of Blake’s boobs… I feel like we’re really close to seeing her nipple, and I also think she was trying to start a nerd riot (Ryan, Peter Sarsgaard and Mark Strong are also in these photos):
Header: Blake & Ryan on July 24, 2010. Credit: WENN.
Sometimes when I’m looking through our photo agencies, I notice weird details in the thumbnails, and then when I go to look at the normal-sized photo, it doesn’t look so weird. That’s what happened with these Renee Zellweger photos – in the thumbnails, I was immediately like “Boob job much?” But now that I’m looking at the photos, I can’t really decide. Is it just me, or is Renee looking healthier (gasp!)? Seriously, she doesn’t look emaciated and like a fragile little baby bird too weak to flap her little winglets. It’s a good look.
I want to think that this is Bradley Cooper’s influence. I want to think that Renee found love with a good guy (homosexual or not), and that Bradley is encouraging her to gain weight and embrace a body image that isn’t so… noticeably ghastly. But is a boob job part of the new and improved Renee? Or is this just a really great padded bra? The way Renee is posing for the paparazzi makes me think she’s showing off her “new” figure, you know? The way she’s carrying herself makes me think the boobs were purchased. I could totally be wrong though!
In Touch Weekly has an interesting and somewhat creepy photo-based story on whether several women have recently gone under the knife to get their breasts enhanced, or whether they just found some really great bras. They discuss Miley Cyrus (but come to the conclusion that Miley’s 17-year-old boobs are still growing) and one of the 90210 chicks whose name I couldn’t care less about. But I found the Rihanna and Kate Bosworth comments interesting. Just FYI: In Touch got plastic surgeons and bra experts who have not treated these women to do the comments.
Rihanna’s Boobs:
Is Rihanna rocking new implants in addition to her fiery new red hair? Although she has denied getting implants, Dr. Schulman thinks so. “Her breasts are larger and fuller, and the edges of the breast implants are visible,” he says. He believes that she’s gone from a B-cup to a C-cup. Jene Luciani (author of The Bra Book) thinks the results look natural with her shape. “They suit her nicely!”
[From In Touch Weekly, print edition]
Here’s a photo of Rihanna’s boobs from two weeks ago:
And from 2005:
Call me crazy, but I kind of think Rihanna’s boobs looked bigger when she was younger and about 10 pounds heavier. She must gain and lose weight in her boobs. Also, a C-cup? Doubtful. To my eyes, she’s a B-cup, solid.
Now, to Kate Bosworth:
Kate Bosworth’s boobs:
Kate looks much fuller on top, and that’s in line with the new, smaller boob-job trend. Jene Luciani believes Kate has upgraded her original A-cup boobs with modest C-cup implants. “There’s a fullness on top that’s only achieved via implants,” Luciani says.
[From In Touch Weekly, print edition]
Here’s Kate in June of this year:
And in 2004:
Now, I actually do think Kate might have gotten her boobs done, but once again, I don’t think it’s a C-cup. She looks like she went from A to B-cup. Plus, she wears a lot of bustiers to emphasize what little she has.
Here are the photos from Katy Perry’s appearance on the cover of the new issue of Esquire UK. I guess it’s the August issue? Sure. Everyone keeps talking about them like it’s some kind of scandal, or like it’s so shocking that a girl with little talent and great boobs would dare to use her boobs to get publicity. And don’t get me wrong – while I don’t care for Katy in general, I appreciate that she has an amazing body, and a figure that actually looks healthy and like she doesn’t spend her life on a diet. So it’s nice to see a healthy looking girl who is all “My boobs are here!” But it just seems like that’s all she’s got to offer. I was looking through the photos, and I noticed that in most of them, she’s trying to draw attention to her boobs. That’s what sells, I guess. They look natural to me, so more power to her.
When Katy was recently in England, she sat down with Graham Norton for an interview, and she made an allusion to the rumor that she and Russell Brand are already married?
Not-yet-married Katy Perry may have let the cat out of the bag in England over the weekend about her upcoming nuptials with comedian Russell Brand. “Life’s never dull with him, that’s why I married him!” Katy she said while taping a segment for The Graham Norton Show, which will air in the UK today.
After the audience reacted, she corrected herself: “That’s why I’m marrying him!”
Later, however, she slipped again and called Brand’s mother her mother-in-law.
The couple got engaged in India over the holidays.
Hm. Did they get hitched secretly? I doubt it, actually. Just because I think Russell is having a good time planning the wedding (seriously) and because these two might want it to become a spectacle. Not that I think their marriage is destined for all time or anything. It makes no difference to me!
Seriously, this girl wishes she was Bettie Page.
Esquire UK photos courtesy of Celebnewswire & Holy Moly.
So, the general consensus is that Kate Gosselin is boning her bodyguard Steve Neild, right? That’s how it’s always struck me, and I just asked CB, and she thinks it’s on between Kate and Steve too. Why do we think this? Probably because he spends way more time with Kate than with his wife. And because he and Kate are literally always together. And because he advises her on things like her breast implants.
Bosom buddy, indeed! Mom of eight Kate Gosselin, 35, is rarely seen without her trusted bodyguard of three years, Steve Neild. During her recent run on Dancing with the Stars, a show source says, the New Zealander was “omnipresent on the set — at rehearsals, on the press line, everywhere!”
And now a source says in the new Us Weekly the married father of two not only drove Gosselin to the doctor when she got breast enhancements March 30, 2009, but even weighed in on what the result should be: “Kate was going to have one kind of breast augmentation, but she changed her mind after talking to Steve about what would look best.”
(Multiple sources tell Us Weekkly the procedure — which can cost $10,000 — took place. Gosselin went from a size 4 shirt to a size 6 shirt.)
Asked about a boob job earlier this year, Gosselin responded, “Plastic surgery? Please. Who has time to even think about it, let alone do it?”
Well, she did: The TLC star’s tummy tuck was documented on a 2007 episode of Jon and Kate Plus 8!
Could this all be innocent? Sure. If I was considering implants (HA, I’m a DD-cup), I would consult various men (not necessarily lovers), just to get their take on what kind of size and stuff they prefer, in general. I’ve actually considered breast reduction, and I’ve already asked various men what they think about that (a resounding “HELL NO”). So is Us Weekly twisting something innocent? Eh. I still think she and Steve are getting it on.
Header: Kate & Steve on April 23, 2010. Credit: WENN.
A few days ago, I reported the rumor that Sarah Palin had maybe gotten a boob job, based pretty much on her recent boob-tastic appearance at Belmont. I thought there was a 50-50 chance that she had gotten them done, just because they really did look bigger and fuller than usual. Other theories included a really good padded bra, a great shirt, weight gain and/or a series of strangely-angled photos. I also liked that Palin didn’t come out and confirm or deny either way – it separates her from people like Nicole Kidman and Demi Moore, who are “all natural” apparently. Anyway, Palin still isn’t denying it directly, but a “pal” tells Us Weekly that the boob job rumors are “ridiculous.”
A source close to Sarah Palin slams reports that the former Vice Presidential candidate had a boob job.
“It’s absolutely ridiculous,” the insider tells UsMagazine.com of the rumor, which hit the web earlier this week, after Palin appeared considerably curvier at Sunday’s Belmont Stakes horse race in Elmont, New York.
Still, it’s not the first time Alaska’s former governor has flaunted her cleavage. In a candid photo from her days as an undergrad at the University of Idaho, a younger Palin, now 46, showed off a pink T-shirt that read “I may be broke but, I’m not flat busted.”
Reps for Palin and her Political Action Committee could not be reached for comment despite repeated attempts by UsMagazine.com.
Now that we’ve gotten a denial, I believe it even more. The only thing that’s keeping me from being totally convinced is that I don’t really know when Palin might have had the procedure done – she’s photographed a lot, probably every day or every other day. Could she have slipped away for several days/a week to get her boobs done, and no one noticed her absence? I was looking through photos of her from the past month, and the last photos we have of her before her like-new boobs appeared on June 5 was a speech she gave on May 23. Is that enough time to go in, get them done and come out wearing a clingy white shirt at Belmont? Probably.
Gawker and Wonkette are running stories about Sarah Palin possibly getting a boob job. They’re basing their speculation on these photos of Palin over the weekend, looking particularly booby. Is it just the shirt? Or did someone treat herself to some well-in-proportion boobs? Here’s a side by side comparison, courtesy of Gawker:
Of course, it’s perfectly possible that this is just a very boob-flattering shirt combined with a padded Vicky’s Secret bra. Combined with gaining a little weight too, maybe? It’s possible that the angle of the photos is strange, and giving her a very boob-tastic effect. It’s also possible that she got some work done. Now – I’ve long said, I don’t really care about the work women (or men) get, unless the plastic surgery is so hardcore that they have a new face and/or body. I also appreciate it when they either admit they had work done, or they simply stay quiet, rather than try some weak-ass denial (cough NicoleKidmanDemiMoore cough). As of yet, Palin hasn’t said anything, no denials, no confirmation. And it doesn’t look like she had anything done to her face, so good for her. And after how many kids… five?… I’m not going to blame her for getting her boobs done, if that’s what she did.
I was just glancing through these new photos of Nicole Kidman promoting Omega (she’s one of the faces of the brand) in Hong Kong today, and for the most part, my thoughts ran to the same old talking points. As in “Why does she do that to her beautiful face?” and “It’s funny to see how nothing moves on her jacked face when she tries to smile.” That’s honestly why people still have sympathy for Nicole – she always looks like she’s in pain. She probably is in pain. Every time she tries to smile, the wall of Botox in her face screams “DON’T DO IT … DO NOT SHOW EMOTION… MAN THE TORPEDOS.”
And then I came to this part of the photo array – Nicole wearing a plunging black cocktail number, also for part of the Omega press.
Now… I’ve put this out there before, and I have to ask it again – did Nicole get implants? Or are we still holding strong to the theory that Nicole’s boobs look like that because she was pregnant with little Sunday Roast? I know many of you hate when I say this, but I can’t help what I believe in my heart – Nicole wasn’t pregnant. So how did she get those boobs? I really think they’re implants. She just went from an A-cup to a B/C-cup, but she’s been jacking those things up lately.
By the way, when she was doing press, she was talking to a reporter about her marriage to Keith Urban, and how her marriage rule (for this marriage at least) is that they can’t be apart for more than three days. Kidman told the reporter: “I think I’ve reached a point in my life where I’ve slowed down a lot, so it’s not difficult. My priority is very much keeping my family together and not being away from them.” Um… isn’t Keith on tour or something? Hasn’t he been on tour a lot since their marriage? Does Nicole follow him around on tour? I thought she had better things to do with her time.
Nicole Kidman in Hong Kong on May 20, 2010. Credit: Pacific Coast News.
