Does Gwyneth Paltrow still have the ability to shock you? At this point… not so much. For me, the “Goop Too Far” was her story about “everybody scrambling for a razor” when she tried on the Berardi dress without panties. Meaning that Gwyneth now promotes her films by talking about her the size and hirsuteness of her bush. So what was next on Gwyneth’s TMI Tour? A stop on Chelsea Lately, where Chelsea Handler did the heavy lifting and told the audience about Gwyneth’s “advice” to ladies fighting with their men. I’ll spare you the build-up: if you’re mad at your man, don’t yell at him, just go down on him. Goop-Style (Goop-Style = pinkies in the air as you stroke).

She paints herself as a domestic goddess, and once encouraged people to ‘nourish the inner aspect’ on her pretentious Goop lifestyle website. But it seems even perfect Gwyenth Paltrow is not always brimming with such lofty words of wisdom.

In a new interview it emerged the 40-year-old actress, who is married to Coldplay singer Chris Martin, once advised a female friend that oral sex was the solution for women wanting to prevent an argument with their husbands. The Iron Man 3 actress didn’t volunteer this story willingly, but was left red faced after chat show host Chelsea Handler made the revelation as she made an appearance on her show on Monday night.

Paltrow was having dinner with friends, including Handler, when the unnamed woman told them she was furious with her spouse after a huge bust up. But according to Handler, Gwyneth told her to let go of her anger – before giving her the unusual advice.

[From The Mail]

See, all of this time, I only thought of beejs in peasant terms, as a gift you give when YOU need to get out of trouble. It turns out that all of us should be handing out beejs whenever our dudes piss us off. Which is a really terrible way to exist in any relationship – that’s positive reinforcement of bad behavior. All your man will learn is that he can act like an a—hole and you’ll still give him beejs. It’s like giving your dog a treatie for piddling on the carpet. Classic GOOP.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

There’s one thing that I don’t flat-out hate about Chelsea Handler (generous of me, I know): I don’t hate her when she’s talking honestly about how she doesn’t want children, or how being a wife and mother was never her goal. In that one instance, I find her refreshingly honest. Maybe it’s because it’s one of the few times I relate to her and agree with her. Chelsea did an interview with Amanda de Cadenet (I have yet to see an episode of The Conversation) and the conversation turned to babies and… again, I give Chelsea credit for not spouting the standard “Oh, I want babies, soon!” crap. Chelsea’s not into babies.

Chelsea Handler has said it before, and now she’s saying it again: “I definitely don’t want to have kids.” The 38-year-old Chelsea Lately host explained her decision to not have children during the Apr. 27 episode of The Conversation With Amanda de Cadenet.

“I don’t think I’d be a great mother,” the New Jersey native said. “I don’t want to have a kid and have it raised by a nanny. I don’t have the time to raise a child. Childhood was heartbreaking enough for anybody. I don’t know that I could handle my own child, especially if I had a girl, going through what I went through growing up. Not that it was so traumatic, but in many ways, it was in your own way.”

Handler, the youngest of five children, also opened up about her long-distance relationship with wealthy hotelier Andre Balazs, her on-and-off love since the spring of 2011. “My boyfriend is as busy as I am, so we both make time. I think if you want to be in a relationship with someone, you both make it happen, and we do,” the My Horizontal Life: A Collection of One-Night Stands author said of the divorced father of two, 56. “We’re fortunate enough to be able to have the wherewithal and the resources to kind of meet each other all over the place.”

The comedienne, whose exes include rapper 50 Cent and animal trainer Dave Salmoni, said she actually prefers having a bicoastal relationship. (Handler resides primarily in L.A., while Balazs lives in New York City.)

“It’s always fun. It’s always exciting,” Handler revealed. “He’s very romantic. He’s very good for me and I’m very good for him. He’s pretentious and I’m not, so I take him down a notch and he brings me up a notch.”

Though the pair have broken up twice, they’ve since learned how to better understand each other’s needs. “We had some troubles in the beginning because we were both fighting who the other person was. Everything you like about somebody you end up detesting about them. . . Finally, we both calmed down and then we were able to come together in a much different way,” Handler said. “But I’m grateful to be in an adult relationship because I always figured, ‘Oh, I’ll just have sex with a bunch of guys and have my career.’”

[From Us Weekly]

I still don’t understand the Andre Balazs thing. Maybe I never will. I mean, I understand what she sees in him – he’s rich, he’s powerful, he’s incredibly well-connected and he provides her with so much legitimacy as a celebrity or whatever. But what does she do for him? That’s what I don’t understand. Anyway, here you go. My one relatively nice Chelsea Handler post. I guess I do one of these a year.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

I really like all of the discussion about how Reese Witherspoon can attempt to “come back” from her arrest and image crisis disaster. LaineyGossip suggested that Reese would be smart to give People Magazine a series of exclusives to reinforce her “down-home church-going soccer mom” image, and I’m sure those are coming. I think Reese’s damage control has already begun as soon as a “source” told People (on Monday afternoon) that Jim Toth might end up in rehab. But what’s missing from the discussion is a first-hand account (not just the police report) of just HOW drunk and rednecky Reese was during her debauched Georgia night. Thankfully, People Magazine is also accepting stories from the Atlanta police:

It’s certainly not from a red carpet. Still, Reese Witherspoon’s booking photo with her eyes cast down has to be among the more unusual celebrity mugshots.

“She was wobbly,” explains a police source within the Atlanta Department of Corrections. “She didn’t need help walking, but she wasn’t at a point where we could get a really clear picture.”

The actress and husband Jim Toth were arrested early Friday morning after he was pulled over under suspicion of driving while intoxicated in Atlanta. In her apology for her behavior, she said she “clearly had one drink too many.”

According to the source, police took more than one photograph and chose the best one.

“On another picture, she sort of bent down at the waist and we got the top of her head,” says the source. “She wasn’t being difficult or rude, but her motor skills weren’t what they needed to be.”

The unorthodox picture has the Atlanta police and legal communities talking – and wondering if Witherspoon got preferential treatment.

“You can’t look down in the photograph,” says Atlanta criminal defense attorney Peter Odom. “The whole point of a mugshot is for identification purposes. To my knowledge, there is no exception to this rule. When someone is in custody, there isn’t a lot of personal space. They will grab your head and move it into the right position to get the right mugshot. But in this case, protocol was definitely not followed.”

The charges against Witherspoon were minor, says the source, so there was no need to force the issue and make the star stare dead ahead.

“This isn’t a big case and there’s not much more investigation that has to be done,” says the source, “so getting a clear picture of the suspect looking at the camera wasn’t absolutely necessary.”

[From People]

Am I the only one who finds this kind of story fascinating? Like, Reese is drunkenly slurring out “Do you know who I am?!” and she’s so wasted she can’t even stand up for her mugshot? But I also agree that this isn’t a situation where she got “preferential treatment”. It’s not like she killed someone (although her husband could have). She was just a drunk, mouthy redneck. It’s not a capital crime. That being said, TMZ got their hands on Reese-in-handcuffs at the police station, and I can’t say that she seemed super-blitzed in this video:

See? She just seems “loose”. Wouldn’t it be even worse for Reese if she wasn’t actually that drunk at the time of her arrest? That would mean she had more control over herself when she hung out of the window and screamed “I am a US citizen, I am allowed to stand on American ground!”

Meanwhile, there’s another image-control effort being undertaken by Reese’s friend/drinking buddy Chelsea Handler: Handler has decided that Reese’s situation is no biggie.

Is all the fuss over Reese Witherspoon’s recent arrest much ado about nothing? Chelsea Handler certainly seems to think so. Asked about her A-list pal at the annual E! Network upfronts in New York City on Monday, April 22, the late-night host (who was arrested herself at age 21 for DUI) said that Witherspoon was dealing well with the fallout from her minor run-in with the law.

“She’s doing fine. She’s doing fine, you know?” Handler told Entertainment Tonight of the Mud actress, who was arrested on Friday, April 19, in Atlanta, Ga. “She was just trying to protect her husband, so…I mean everybody makes mistakes, so it’s not a big deal.”

[From Us Weekly]

Yes, Chelsea Handler is the voice of reason, of calm, contemplative compassion and turning the other cheek. Unless it’s Angelina Jolie. And I really don’t get this whole “she was just trying to protect her husband” thing. Reese referenced that in her original apology too: “It was definitely a scary situation and I was frightened for my husband…” Is Jim Toth a fluffy little bunny who can’t function without his wife redneck-smacking all of his enemies? I guess I understand where Chelsea is coming from though – she’s with CAA too. They must be on high-alert over there.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

I know some of y’all really dislike Brandi Glanville, but don’t you have to give her some credit for being… what’s the word? “Mouthy”. She’s a mouthy broad, and I mean that as a compliment. I’d rather sit with someone who will talk s—t about every person in the room as opposed to someone who will just sit there and never say one “bad” thing. Now, does Brandi’s mouth get in her trouble? Yeah. And God knows, she needs a better filter. But not today! Brandi appeared on Watch What Happens Live last night, and when asked about LeAnn Rimes, Brandi steered the conversation over to her hate-on for Chelsea Handler. It was awesome.

New feud alert: Chelsea Handler and Brandi Glanville. Brandi, appearing on Watch What Happens Live Monday night, shot back at the snarky comic’s recent jabs against the Real Housewives franchise.

“She sucked on your show,” Brandi said of Chelsea’s appearance on the Bravo chat show last week. “She was horrible. She wasn’t funny, it was completely awkward.”

As for the negative comments about the Housewives — Chelsea said the franchise is “sick,” and she avoids booking the reality stars on her show — Brandi said simply, “Chelsea, suck it!”

The outspoken ex of Eddie Cibrian said Chelsea “hates her” because they share many of the same connections.

“We know each other,” Brandi said. “We have the same gaygent, and I made out with her lesbian and her assistant and her brother!”

[From Radar]

I think Brandi’s criticism of Chelsea is completely fair – Chelsea IS awkward, and I’m always amazed at how terrible she is on television considering she HOSTS a TV show. Like, her timing is always off, she’s not half as funny as she thinks she is, and she just seems nasty and drunk (or something else). And Chelsea claims she doesn’t book reality stars on her show? Who is she kidding?

Honestly, I hope Chelsea responds to Brandi. I hope this becomes the next great C-lister war. The LeAnn thing is played out! I want Brandi and Chelsea to spend the next few months taking each other down.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

After spending the week dismissing Angelina Jolie as a “demon” and Taylor Swift as virgin who got dumped all the time because she wouldn’t put out, Chelsea Handler returned to her great love, obsessively tending to her Team Aniston status. Chelsea appeared on Katie Couric’s talk show and of course the conversation came around to Jennifer Aniston and all of that:

Even Jennifer Aniston’s closest friends are being kept in the dark about her upcoming wedding plans.

“I know she’s engaged but that’s all I know,” Chelsea Handler told talk show host Katie Couric. “I’m sure I’ll find out about it when it’s about to happen … for privacy issues.”

Handler co-hosts Friday’s episode of Couric’s syndicated talk show Katie but had very little to share about her pal Aniston’s pending nuptials to Justin Theroux.

“I honestly don’t know anything about it,” Handler said. “She doesn’t consult me on her plans.”

The Chelsea Lately host also implied she has not been asked to be a bridesmaid (or a flower girl) by Aniston, who announced her engagement to Theroux last fall.

“Would you ask me to be a flower girl? I mean seriously,” she told Couric, who answered politely, “I’m not getting married but I would ask you to be a bridesmaid.”

“Bridesmaids are tricky,” Handler continued. “If I got married I wouldn’t even have a bridesmaid. [My talk show sidekick Chuy Bravo] would be my flower girl – or no, ring bearer. See! I don’t even know what happens at weddings.”

There is one thing Handler can confirm about Aniston’s engagement to Theroux: “She’s happy, of course,” Handler said. “He’s a great guy.”

[From People]

Yes, Chelsea is sure she’ll be invited to Jennifer’s wedding. The invitation will probably be Chelsea’s “reward” for her years of publicly slamming Angelina Jolie. But of course Chelsea can’t be controlled by Jennifer! Jennifer could never tell Chelsea to STFU about Angelina. Never! It’s not like Chelsea gets “rewarded” for being Jennifer’s attack dog (and I mean that in every sense) over and over and over again. It’s not like it looks like Jennifer still spends all of her Goddess Circle time with Chelsea bitching about Angelina Jolie in between shoots of vodka even now.

Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.

Chelsea Handler is talking about Angelina Jolie again. What else is new? I guess this means that Jennifer Aniston’s wedding is going to be soon, because Chelsea Handler stepped out of her cave and didn’t see her shadow. To briefly review just the bare minimum of all of the dumb crap Chelsea has said about Angelina, here are the basics: the time Chelsea called Angelina a “f—king c—t” in her standup act; the multiple times Chelsea brings up her friendship with Jennifer Aniston in interview after interview and, in the same breath, slams Angelina Jolie; the time (last October) where Chelsea spent like 10 minutes telling Howard Stern that Angelina Jolie is evil and that Brad only stays with Jolie because of the kids. Basically, Chelsea has had a hate-on for Angelina for years, and Chelsea’s hate-on coincides (“dovetails”) nicely with Chelsea signing on to CAA (Jennifer Aniston’s agency) and Chelsea’s vodka-soaked friendship with Aniston. Here’s the latest:

Long before she became best friends with Jennifer Aniston, Chelsea Handler made headlines for publicly bashing Angelina Jolie. During a March 5 appearance on Bravo’s Watch What Happens Live, the 38-year-old Chelsea Lately host continued to dis the engaged mother of six.

“She seems like a demon,” Handler said of Jolie, 36. “It has nothing to do with Jennifer. As a woman, I know when you see somebody walking across the room that’s a bad girl. I just don’t like Angelina Jolie. I don’t think she’s a girl’s girl. I like girl’s girls!”

Handler last spoke of Jolie when she appeared on the May 2012 cover of More magazine. Explaining that the Academy Award winner doesn’t seem trustworthy, the comedienne insisted Jolie “doesn’t strike me as someone I would have a close friendship with.”

During a Glamour interview with Katie Couric in 2010, Handler was asked to explain why she used Jolie as fodder for her stand-up routines. (The After Lately star once called the Girl, Interrupted actress “a homewrecker” and “a f-cking c–t.”)

“Yeah, I’m not a fan hers,” Handler replied. “She just doesn’t come off to me as a sincere woman. She seems like a woman that you’d really want to avoid.” Aniston, she countered, “makes me laugh. She’s irreverent and hilarious, and she sends me really, really funny e-mails.”

[From Us Weekly]

Sure. Fine. Quick question for all of the Chelsea defenders who always claim “But… but… she’s funny!” Is this funny to you? Because it just makes me uncomfortable. It’s not a comedic bit, like Joan Rivers would do and has done about Angelina Jolie. Like, Joan Rivers has said some nasty stuff about Angelina in the past too, but Joan makes the effort to couch the criticisms in traditional “jokes”. And Joan is more of a neutral party too – in that Joan cracks jokes about EVERYBODY. With Chelsea, it’s less of a comedic bit and more like a coked-out Mean Girl doing the hatchet work for her more famous friend. And the fact that Jennifer still hasn’t told her friend to STFU? That speaks volumes to me.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

Surprisingly enough, Chelsea Handler wasn’t just name-dropping and hating on Angelina Jolie during her appearance on Watch What Happens Live two nights ago. In between snarling about Angelina Jolie’s “demon” ways (eye-roll), Chelsea also analyzed the Taylor Swift situation. It’s gotten to the point where if Chelsea says black, I’ll say white. So obviously, I completely disagree with Chelsea’s assessment of the Swifty situation. Not only that, I think Chelsea’s assessment is insulting to women and it plays into Tay-Tay’s now-legitimate-seeming whines about sexism and the media.

It’s a tough week to be Taylor Swift. After Golden Globes co-hosts Tina Fey and Amy Poehler gently mocked the singer’s surprisingly serious reaction to their joke about her love life, Chelsea Handler added her two cents during a March 5 appearance on Bravo’s Watch What Happens Live.

In the April issue of Vanity Fair, 23-year-old Swift recited a quote Katie Couric once shared with her when asked how she deals with “mean girls” in Hollywood: “There’s a special place in hell for women who don’t help other women.”

Handler, who is friends with Couric, addressed the controversy when Andy Cohen asked her to weigh in. “I think that was a bold statement, but I’m not on anyone’s side because I just don’t care enough,” the 38-year-old Chelsea Lately host said. “I like that she’s being that vociferous about something that she thinks they were out to get her. They were clearly making a joke just about her demeanor, which is embarrassing. I mean, she’s just dated so many men.”

Swift — whose famous exes include Conor Kennedy, Jake Gyllenhaal, John Mayer, Cory Monteith, Joe Jonas and Taylor Lautner — is currently single after splitting with One Direction’s Harry Styles in January. Handler speculated exactly why the country music superstar doesn’t have long-term relationships.

“My theory about Taylor Swift is that she’s a virgin, that everyone breaks up with her because they date her for two weeks and she’s like, ‘I’m not gonna do it.’ And they’re like, ‘Oh, well, forget it. Then I don’t want to date you,’” Handler imagined. “Every guy thinks they’re going to devirginize her, and they’re not. She’s never going to get devirginized, ever, ever, ever, ever.”

[From Us Weekly]

“They were clearly making a joke just about her demeanor, which is embarrassing. I mean, she’s just dated so many men.” The fact that Taylor has “dated” so many men is NOT what’s embarrassing. That is the kind of slut-shaming attitude which Taylor herself employs, in fact. What’s embarrassing is that Taylor projects (and profits from) an image of perpetual, innocent, glitter-soaked, untouched, lovelorn girlhood while being a completely normal 20-something young woman who dates around and has an active and completely healthy sex life. The only thing this proves to me is that Taylor and Chelsea think alike – sex is not an end unto itself. Sex (or the withholding of sex) is a means to an end. For Chelsea, sex (with her then-married boss) got her an E! show. For Taylor, the image of the perpetual virgin withholding sex is how she makes her money.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Here are the last stragglers from all of the Oscar parties last night – some additional pics from the Vanity Fair party, but mostly these pics are from the Elton John AIDS Foundation party. Elton throws that party every year! Kim Kardashian and BUMP OF DOOM were at Elton’s party. Kanye wasn’t Kim’s date – Kim brought Kourtney instead. I updated the weekend’s Kardashian post, but it’s worth mentioning again – Kim and Kanye are expecting a baby girl. Believe it or not, I think the baby will probably be gorgeous. Think of how Kim looked before she started messing with her face. See? The baby will be gorgeous. As for Kim in this white gown… yeah. It’s like Jessica Simpson – Kim was always going to carry big. That’s just her body type. The problem is when Kim pours herself into some hideous peplum pants. Which is to say… I don’t have a problem with Kim in this gown. She looks fine for what she is. Also: why does Kourtney look so pissed off?

Here’s Miley Cyrus in Azarro – the back on this is really nice and overall, this is a flattering look for her. I don’t even hate her hair! It looks better now that she’s grown it out a little bit, and some bottle blondes just need roots so they don’t look washed out. Miley is one of those girls. I like her faux-hawk too.

Chelsea Handler did the party circuit with her on-again boyfriend Andre Balazs. God, she looks awful. Horrible center part, horrible makeup, unflattering dress. Ugh.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet, FayesVision/WENN.com and WENN.

Piers Morgan was on Chelsea Handler’s show last night, to promote the second anniversary of his own CNN show. I’ve watched the clip that’s available online a couple of times now and I can’t decide if Chelsea and Piers really hate each other and if she’s super annoyed with him, or if they’re just volleying off of each other and it’s all in good fun. Maybe the answer is somewhere in between – they do hate each other and they’re talking smack, but that’s their job too so they’re playing it up. It also strikes me that Chelsea can dish it out but that she can’t take it, because once Piers started turning her own schtick back on her she got bristly, but again it’s hard to tell – she’s always like that. Here’s more, thanks to The Daily Mail for transcribing the good parts:

Appearing as a guest on Chelsea Lately, Piers spent his entire slot poking fun at the rival host, who ended up losing her cool and telling him: ‘You can suck my a**.’

The 47-year-old former newspaper editor had barely sat down in his chair before the insults started flying, proving just how much rivalry there is between two hosts.

As soon as he took his seat, the acerbic blonde presenter asked him: ‘What are you looking at?’

Piers replied with a rather back-handed compliment: ‘Either you’ve had plastic surgery or a makeover as you look really hot today.’

Clearly not impressed with his cheeky comment, the 37-year-old replied: ‘You are so annoying, you are so obnoxious and you wonder why everyone hates you.’

‘I specifically covered up so you couldn’t look at me and undress me with your molester eyes,’ she added, contributing to the escalating banter between the pair.

Not wanting to let Chelsea get the better of him, Piers hit back straight away, saying; ‘Normally when I come on the show you are really hungover in a really unprofessional way.’

After making the allegation, he turned to the audience and added to the insult: ‘She’s like a bad boomerang, you chuck her away and she just sucks back in,’ he said.

Perhaps trying to steer the conversation into more professional territory, the US host reminded him that he had been a guest on the show a year ago.

‘You interviewed me last year on my first anniversary and it just proves one thing….’said Piers.

Interrupting him, Chelsea said: ‘Let me guess, that you’re a better interviewer than I am?’

When a chuckling Piers agreed that that’s where he was going, a fuming Chelsea fired back: ‘I don’t pretend to be a great interviewer, I don’t even pretend to be good at my job.’

‘That’s clearly apparent today but I can help you,’ responded a smirking Piers.

Losing her cool and clearly rising to her guest’s bait, the host simply responded: ‘Suck my a**.’

Laughing out loud, the Brit then asked her again if she’d had any work done, annoying her further: ‘Are you sure you haven’t had any surgery? Seriously?’ he asked.

When Chelsea then announced that she was trying to keep herself together, Piers got out a pretend violin and played it to the audience.

‘Poor multi-millionairess Chelsea, whining about her life again,’ he said.

[From The Daily Mail]

Maybe Chelsea really did get her feathers ruffled, but given how bitchy she usually is it wasn’t that obvious. I hate to give her too much credit, but she held it together well, I thought. I kind of like how she admitted she does a half-ass job. Again, Piers wasn’t saying anything to Chelsea that she doesn’t say to her guests. She’ll come right out with the same kind of barbs against whomever she’s interviewing so he was probably turning the tables to see how she’d handle it. I guess the outcome was predictable. It’s not like she was going to say “thank you” and be nice to him.

As a commenter on The Daily Mail mentioned, “She’s mean. He’s an a$$. Two wrongs don’t make it right.” It makes it somewhat entertaining, though.

Anyway here’s the clip. If you’re not in the US you can watch it on The Daily Mail:

Chelsea is shown at the premiere of Movie 43 on 1-23-13. Credit: WENN.com

When Ryan Seacrest, 38, and Julianne Hough, 24, first got together a little over two years ago, a lot of us thought it was a publicity stunt. I remember that he took her shopping for luxury goods in Paris and made sure the paparazzi were there to document their PDA-heavy outing. The more time that passes, the more they come across like a regular, committed couple. It also helps that we’re getting to know Julianne and that she seems like she’s much wiser and more mature than her years. During his Golden Globe red carpet coverage, Ryan gushed about Julianne’s (goofy) dress a few times, and he was genuine about it. It’s like he was looking for excuses to talk about her.

In a new interview with Chelsea Handler, Ryan continued to praise his girlfriend, calling her “the best part of every day” and admitting that they were considering starting a family together.

“She’s so beautiful…stunning,” the American Idol host said about his girlfriend of two years, Julianne Hough, on Chelsea Lately tonight when Handler flashed a pic of the glamorous duo at the Golden Globes earlier this month.

Agreeing with Handler’s assessment of Hough as a “great girl,” Seacrest called her “phenomenal.”

“She’s the best part of every day,” he said—and, since Seacrest never sleeps, that’s a long day to be the highlight of!

Asked if he wants to get married and have a family, the 38-year-old multihyphenate said, “We both do,” but that the 25-year-old [sic] Hough—not Handler—would be the first one to know when that’s about to happen.

They touched briefly on American Idol, too, Seacrest diplomatically saying that Mariah Carey and Nicki Minaj have “come to work and disagreed about a thing or two, here or there, but now, today, they’re fine.”

“It just sort of depends,” he added, a master of ceremonies, as always.

[From E! Online]

In the video segment posted on E!, Chelsea ribs Ryan and tells him that she’s heard that the decor in his new house “is very feminine.” She makes constant references to the rumors that he bats for the other team. It’s a testament to Ryan’s personality that he didn’t get defensive or deny anything. Plus he practically owns E! He could easily tell Chelsea or The Soup to stop making fun of him, but he accepts the ribbing and doesn’t pull rank. When Chelsea introduced the topic of Ryan’s girlfriend, she said “I believe this relationship, actually” later adding that unlike Ryan “I don’t have to prove to anyone that I’m straight.” That’s Chelsea for ya. (Also, Chelsea says in the interview that Julianne is 25, but she’s not. She doesn’t turn 25 until July.)

As far as Ryan starting a family, I just get the sense that the dude is way too busy to think about it now. He has a radio show, he’s on Idol, he produces multiple reality shows. He looked so tired on Chelsea Lately. He probably can’t even consider having kids at this point, but at least he has plenty of time for that with Julianne. She’s young and seems too busy with her career too.

These photos are of Ryan and Julianne in St. Barts on 1-4 and 1-5-13. Credit: Fame Flynet. They’re also shown at The GG on 1-13-13. Credit: WENN.com