Just after this year’s Met Gala, Gwyneth Paltrow trotted over to a USA Today journalist and snotted out this nasal complaint: “I’m never going again. It was so un-fun. It was boiling. It was too crowded. I did not enjoy it at all.” The Goop had spoken, and the Goopy subtext was that Gwyneth is simply too elite, too fancy, too special, too high-brow, too exquisite to mingle with the peasantry of the Met Gala. But what if we were ignoring a particular part of her complaint? “It was boiling,” Goop wept. I will believe that. It must be a special kind of hell to be wearing thousands of dollars of couture and a full face of makeup and have to sit in some overcrowded, drama-filled, humid tent/building. So Gwyneth was probably overheated and she was sweating like a peasant. So maybe that’s why people are now saying her body odor was the REAL uninvited guest:

Gwyneth Paltrow may be the “World’s Most Beautiful Woman” but she sure doesn’t small like it! Gwyneth had terrible body odor at the Met Gala on May 6th, an eyewitness told The Enquirer – but no one at the swanky red carper event had the guts to tell her.

“Poor Gwyneth looked picture-perfect, but it must have been the hot lights that caused her to be a little strong on the nose,” said a source who got a little too close to Gwyneth. “It was pretty pungent, and I don’t think she had a clue. I saw at least two people wave their hands in front of their noses after passing her.”

A close friend of Gwyneth insists she isn’t usually a stinker, but admits that sometimes Gwyneth – like other celebs – does have problems with excessive sweating when she’s under the glare of strong lighting.

And making matters worse, health-conscious Gwyneth refuses to use deodorant with aluminum, opting for more natural – and often less effective – solutions.

“Gwyneth has heard that aluminum is supposedly carcinogenic, and that putting an aluminum-based deodorant directly on those sensitive armpit glangs can increase the chances of breast cancer.”

But the less toxic alternatives – like crystal rock deodorant – tend not to work as well.

“Is she’s trying out new deodorants, she’s bound to fail with some of them… but Gwyneth tells pals she’d rather be smelly than dead.”

[From The Enquirer, print edition]

Goop’s armpits have more drama than Kanye! Wasn’t there a similar complaint about… Johnny Depp and Leonardo DiCaprio or something? Yeah. What is it about celebrities and their anti-deodorant thing? Yes, aluminum-based deodorants aren’t the best thing in the world, but YOU ARE NOT EATING THEM. And if the choice is between rubbing something sort-of not-great under your arms and being noticeably stinky at a major event, what would you choose? Seriously?

Anyway, I love the idea that Gwyneth refuses to go to the Met Gala ever again because she had body odor like a peasant. The horror!

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet and WENN.

Here are some new photos of Gwyneth Paltrow headed into a party at Mark’s Club in London last night. Do you like her dress? I don’t. There’s too much fug detail all at once, all in one dress. Sheer sleeves AND patterned fabric AND black piping AND a weird gold and leather faux-belt AND a waist ruche AND a skirt slit? It’s too much bad design concentrated in one outfit. Plus, Gwyneth’s styling sucks.

In other Goop news, we’ve discussed this before, but there are new details: Goop’s BFF Tracy Anderson is starting a new food-delivery service for the rich and famous. It’s called “The Food Program by Tracy Anderson” and it sounds just like The Zone Diet which was popular in the late 1990s in Hollywood – The Zone people would deliver specialized diet food to your house for an exorbitant cost. Tracy’s “Food Program” costs $54.95 per day for 14 days ($840 for two weeks worth of diet food), and Tracy credited Gwyneth for coming up with the recipes, saying that Gwyneth was “instrumental in helping create the program… She’s in the kitchen to make things taste insanely amazing and I’m in the kitchen getting weight off of people.” I would be willing to bet that Gwyneth invested heavily in The Food Program too, considering Gwyneth gave the seed money (and then some) for Tracy’s latest gyms and all of Tracy’s programs and such.

Hilariously (to me), when Tracy was promoting The Food Program, she ended up slamming one of Gwyneth’s favorite things in the world: juice fasts/cleanses!

Tracy Anderson hates juice cleanses as they encourage unsustainable “extreme dieting”. The Hollywood fitness guru is responsible for toning and honing some of the finest figures in the entertainment industry. Tracy is known for being business partners and close friends with actress Gwyneth Paltrow, but has controversially disagreed with the Goop founder’s views on juice diets.

Gwyneth has previously advocated the use of the juice cleanses to help shift weight fast, but health and fitness expert Tracy says they are to be avoided at all cost.

“I 100 per cent hate them. I think it’s a really unfortunate trend, and it’s not a sustainable weight-loss program. Plus, once you puree anything, you lose nutritional value by the second. You’re drinking calories: If you’re going to drink that many calories, you might as well eat anyway. It’s extreme dieting,” Tracy ranted to Allure magazine. “Skinny is not the end all for beauty – a lot more goes into being beautiful than [whether you] have extra weight on you.”

Tracy’s clients have included Jennifer Lopez, Courteney Cox and her biggest fan Gwyneth. The trainer explained her latest project, which is an expansion of her fitness empire, including food as well as exercise programmes.

Tracy chatted about her US food-delivery program, which launched earlier this month.

“Nutrition is something I’ve been in for 15 years. When I started the [Tracy Anderson] Method, part of transforming these women was making sure they lose weight as their muscular structure changes. It takes time to get good at fitness, and nutrition is a huge component to wellness. I don’t like people to live on diets,” she explained.

“There’s so much confusion out there – from protein bars to shakes to diets to counting calories. I became frustrated with what’s being sold as diets to help people lose weight. They’re not sustainable and they’re pumped with chemicals – if you leave it to people to calorie-restrict, they’ll be like, ‘Oh, I’ll have my soy latte because it’s this many calories, and then I’ll have this little Weight Watchers cake.’”

[From The Belfast Telegraph]

Damn! Tracy is really going after Gwyneth’s most favorite thing in the world, her beloved juice cleanses. Of course, I seriously doubt Gwyneth really does “cleanses” for the actual cleansing. She just uses juice cleanses as a way to explain her eating disorder and to promote unhealthy eating and dieting habits to her followers. Also – I don’t understand how pureeing food makes it lose nutritional value? I’m not a nutritionist, obviously, but is pureeing food really that terrible?

Here’s your extra-credit assignment. Write a 100-word essay parsing this sentence: “Skinny is not the end all for beauty – a lot more goes into being beautiful than [whether you] have extra weight on you.”

Photos courtesy of WENN.

About a year ago, Kate Moss and Gwyneth Paltrow were among the celebrities invited to party with Sir Phillip Green in Mexico for his 60th birthday party thing. I assumed that Kate and Gwyneth were paid to party with Green, or that the party was just so elite and lavish that it was worth their while to come to Mexico for several days. Anyway, the UK tabloids claimed that Kate and Goop got into some kind of confrontation/girl-fight while in Mexico. Gwyneth was out jogging on the beach while Kate was probably nursing an epic hangover, and Kate was all “Why are jogging on vacation, Goop?” And Goop was all, “So I don’t look like you when I get old.” And so Kate allegedly threw some potato chips at Gwyneth and retorted: “Why don’t you eat some f—king carbs?!”

Apparently, all of the other party guests heard about it and everyone was laughing at both of them. Gwyneth later denied that it happened, although she and Kate have barely been in the same place since then. So did it go down? And is Gwyneth now trying to bury the hatchet?

After a legendary fall-out over food and fitness a year ago, Kate Moss and Gwyneth Paltrow have buried the hatchet – over a slice of pizza.

Their argument began at Sir Philip Green’s 60th birthday party in Mexico last May.

According to witnesses, Kate, asked Iron Man actress Gwyneth why she was jogging on the beach.

Mother-of-two Gwyneth was reported to have fired back: ‘So I don’t look like you when I get old.’
An apoplectic Kate threw a handful of crisps at her, yelling: ‘Eat some f*****g carbs!’

Ironically, it was carbohydrates that reunited Kate, 39, and Gwyneth, 40, last week when they crossed paths at a smart North London pizza restaurant owned by the Soho House group and famed for its hog roast pizzas and macaroni cheese.

‘Gwyneth was at the Pizza East Kentish Town with husband Chris Martin, and their kids Apple and Moses, celebrating Apple’s ninth birthday with some of her friends,’ a fellow diner reveals. ‘As Gwyneth was about to leave, Kate waltzed across from the other side of the restaurant to say hello. They exchanged kisses and chatted for about ten minutes. Kate’s husband Jamie Hince also came over and everything seemed really friendly.’

[From The Mail]

Interesting. It’s interesting that Kate was the one to make the move to reconcile with Gwyneth. For all of her talk about New Age crap and finding peace and doing endless amounts of therapy, Gwyneth is the immature one who holds a silly grudge, and Kate is the one who is all, “I don’t even remember what we were fighting about.” This story makes Kate seem like a nice person and Gwyneth seem unworthy of her friendship.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Ha! I love how celebrities are totally shading Gwyneth Paltrow these days. If you missed my earlier post on Chloe Sevigny’s world-class shade on Goop, go here. Chloe was asked for her thoughts on Gwyneth’s petulant hissy fit about how “un-fun” the Met Gala was this year. And now Us Weekly’s print edition has an excellent story about WHY Gwyneth had such an awful time this year. It involves Madonna! Madonna and Gwyneth used to be friends until they had a falling out at some point a few years ago. Now they barely speak to each other, and Madonna goes out of her way to be a bitch to Goop.

The Material Girl is a Mean Girl! An insider tells Hot Stuff that Madonna went out of her way to make ex-friend Gwyneth Paltrow miserable at the May 6 Met Gala in NYC. Madonna gave Gwyneth the cold shoulder, then buddied up to tablemate – and current Paltrow pal – Beyonce.

“She chatted with Beyonce for most of the evening and didn’t even glance at Gwyneth,” says the source. “Everyone talked about it.”

The feud stems back to 2009, when Paltrow got fed up with the rude treatment from her onetime BFF.

“Madonna would sh-t on her, over and over,” says a Paltrow source. Years after Gwyneth dropped her, Madge is still hurt by the snub, says another insider: “She fels Gwyneth abandoned her. Now Madonna will do anything to make her suffer.”

And apparently she did. Days after the fashion bash, Paltrow told interviewers she would never attend again.

“It was so un-fun, I did not enjoy it at all.”

[From Us Weekly, print edition]

I don’t believe that Gwyneth dropped Madonna because Madonna “would sh-t on her over and over.” I mean, I believe Madonna can be an awful person and she always has to be “top dog” in her relationships, but who believes that Gwyneth isn’t perfectly capable of being just as nasty, judgmental and bitchy right back? No, I think they had a falling out over several things, especially Tracy Anderson and that whole situation. Gwyneth pretty much “stole” Tracy from Madonna and that’s the biggest untold gossip story.

But yeah, how funny is it to imagine Madonna spending all of her time with Gwyneth’s new BFF Beyonce? Goop must have been so peeved.

Hilariously, Gwyneth’s Goop-letter this week is her behind-the-scenes of the Met Gala and how she chose that awful pink Valentino, etc. You can read it here.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Did you see Chloe Sevigny on The Mindy Project? Chloe was on for a few episodes and she was surprisingly great. I remember when she was on Will & Grace too – Chloe is a surprisingly deft comedienne if she’s given strong writing, and on TMP, they gave her funny lines and she had really sweet chemistry with Chris Messina (she was playing Messina’s ex-wife). Anyway, Chloe is still a thing (yay!) and she still gets acting AND modeling gigs. She’s the current face of Absolut Elyx vodka, and Vulture asked her about her appearance at the Met Gala and about Gwyneth Paltrow’s Goop-hissy about how awful the Gala was this year (pity we couldn’t get Chloe’s comments on Gwyneth’s “I was literally a transvestite” quote). Chloe’s reaction was priceless:

Last night, Chloë Sevigny hosted an event for Absolut Elyx vodka, whose ad campaign she currently fronts. In the spirit of flowing liquor, the Cut asked if she’d ever given a drunk interview, à la Gwyneth Paltrow last week. “I always say something I wish I hadn’t, almost every time I interview, so I generally try not to drink too much at press events,” she said.

As for Paltrow’s recent Met Gala tirade, she could sympathize: “Maybe her sleeves were too tight. If you’re in a dress where you can’t breathe, then you’re not comfortable. I found that out the hard way after going five or six times. It’s more important to be really comfortable in your dress. That was a big thing with Proenza Schouler, they made my dress this year. I said, ‘I have to be able to lift my arms and move them around.’”

“I think it depends on what table you’re at, and who you’re with, and obviously your attitude. But it’s a lot of hoopla over not a lot. Everybody thinks it’s so much pressure, and you do the carpet and it’s such a big deal, and it’s just a museum fund-raiser, you know? But you have to wear comfortable shoes and an outfit you can be okay in.”

[From NY Magazine]

Is this shade or sympathy? I think it’s shade wrapped in faux sympathy. I think this was the equivalent of Chloe saying, “Oh, poor little thing, you’re so uncomfortable and you’re whining about something that really doesn’t matter.” LaineyGossip covered this yesterday and she said that Chloe and Goop have never clashed before, but a long time ago, Chloe shaded Gwyneth HARD. It made such an impression on me, I went and dug up the old magazine. It was in a 2001 Harper’s Bazaar interview, and Chloe’s shade was even more perfect than “maybe her sleeves were too tight.” Behold:

“I used to be really addicted to the fashion magazines,” Sevigny says with a weary tone, “and I think I’m pretty schooled as far as the designers go, but I don’t study fashion. I don’t think it’s worth studying…”

“Fashion is just there.” She’s sipping dry white wine and smoking Parliaments, both in steady succession.

“Carolyn Bessette always looked so elegant – and like Gwyneth Paltrow wishes,” Sevigny continues. “Carolyn Bessette always looked so clean and, like, not forced. I mean, it wasn’t as if she was wearing Calvin Klein – she was wearing Yohji Yamamamoto and offbeat things, but she looked amazing in them.”

“She was so consistent, whereas Gwyneth will one day look this way and the next day look completely different.” She laughs – which comes as a kind of shock. It sounds like a blender on a high speed. “Actually I really feel for Gwyneth,” she says, “because how much pressure does she have to look good every time she goes out… they’re going to rip her apart if she looks bad and they’re gonna rip her apart if she looks good.”

[From Harper’s Bazaar, print edition, May 2001]

Now THAT is some beautiful shade right there. There’s just so much pity and contempt. Poor Gwyneth wishes she could look as beautiful as the late Carolyn Bessette. Poor Gwyneth feels so much pressure. Poor Gwyneth should be more consistent. Sorry, I just loved that interview and I’ve always wanted to use those quotes!

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Gwyneth Paltrow has the funniest woe-is-Goop interview in USA Today – you can read the full thing here. After exhausting all of us with tales of her perfect life and after years of doling out helpful Goop advice (“buy $458,003 worth of clothes for Spring!”), after talking about her hairy Goop and after managing to get named “The Most Beautiful Woman” by People Mag, Gwyneth wants all of us to know that she’s just like us. She has flaws! She isn’t perfect! And she doesn’t know why everyone is putting such unreasonable “perfect” labels on her. Some of my favorite quotes:

She’s a lightning rod: “I’m a real lightning rod. People project a lot of stuff onto me. It’s nothing to do with me. I don’t read stuff about myself. I feel like it’s none of my business. People perceive that I have too much. I understand that, but I also feel like I’ve suffered so much. It’s not something I talk about. I don’t have a perfect life. I don’t have a perfect anything. I have incredible struggles, and I’m far from perfect. I struggle like every other woman, every other mother. I understand that things look a certain way.”

She didn’t realize that Goop would take off: “I never know where I’m going. I never know what I’m doing. I’m on this weird journey.”

She works so hard! “Right now I’m just so (expletive) tired. After my Iron Man and cookbook press tour and this, I’m done. I think I’ve answered every conceivable question. Your brain freezes.”

Her Met Gala look: “Are you crazy? I’m like RuPaul! I have so much makeup on. Foundation! Last night, I was literally a transvestite.”

Her city-guide Goop Apps: “I really pound the pavement. But I love it. It’s so much fun. It’s about curation and connection. I did the app for myself because it’s so helpful and it’s so practical. The website I do for other people,” Paltrow says, adding that she loves “the idea that you could share something that could positively impact someone’s life.”

She works so much: “I wake up with the kids. Breakfast. School run. I have an hour to work. I work out, and then I do Goop until it’s time to pick up the kids. It’s kind of my real main job. I can only do one movie a year. It’s too hard on the family. It’s great to have a few jobs! I work hard to keep it good.”

Being named “Most Beautiful”: Her husband, she says, “was really proud. It was very sweet. I got so many e-mails about that. I loved it, because I feel like I’m a mother and I’m a woman. I was very, very honored. It’s a huge title, even though it’s not true. I always see what’s wrong with me. I’ve got crow’s feet, and one boob is sagging more than the other.”

[From USA Today]

“People perceive that I have too much. I understand that, but I also feel like I’ve suffered so much.” I don’t really understand her thought process here. She does have “too much”. She worked for it (of sorts) and if she was just living her elite life with her five homes and $500,00 worth of clothes for each season, I think we would just accept it and roll our eyes, which is what we do when we hear of conspicuous consumption from other celebrities. It’s like she doesn’t understand that by making “recommendations” and encouraging people to “live like Goop” that she’s engaging us to accept her as the ideal we should have – and that’s what many people have a problem with. As for her “suffering” comment… I don’t understand? In Goop’s mind, she deserves to have all of this wonderful because she’s “suffered”?

Oh, and I think she meant that she had so much makeup on, she looked like a “sort of like a drag queen” not “literally like a transvestite”. But now I’m just being nitpicky, right?

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

There are several piece of Gwyneth Paltrow news to cover, and I’m not sure what I was waiting for. I guess I just go through phases where Gwyneth kind of exhausts me and I try not to cover her so much. Thankfully, Gwyneth’s two-month-long media extravaganza is pretty much over – her book has been promoted (successfully) and Iron Man 3 is a huge hit, so Gwyneth can go back to being someone we don’t cover every single day, right? Right. Hopefully.

So Gwyneth added some more elitist stuff to her Goop store and OMG, this might be the most epic one yet. Gwyneth added a number of high-end items from Foundwell – you can see the page here. There are a pair of decanters, a silver tray, an art deco ice bucket and much more. All of the items are sterling silver and all of the items look gorgeous and high-end, of course. They would make lovely housewarming gifts if you were a millionaire and you were only friends with millionaires. But here’s my favorite item:

$950 for a silver SHOT GLASS. A fancy shot glass, of course, but REALLY? Think about that. You’re paying a cool thousand dollars (with shipping & handling and taxes) for a SHOT GLASS. Classic Goop. How are the silver ice tongs only $375? That’s a relative bargain compared to the shot glass. Sidenote: Does anyone else think it’s kind of weird that all of these super-high-end boutique companies want to be this closely associated with Gwyneth? Granted, she can get them publicity, but if I was running a company that sold $5000 decanters, I don’t think I would want my stuff sold on Gwyneth’s Goop Shop.

And here’s part of the interview Gwyneth did with some Aussie DJs Kyle and Jackie O. They recorded the whole thing. Goop is incredibly nasal and she’s getting her drink on. I have to give her credit for being free enough to participate in this kind of liquor-soaked interview, and I’ll also give her credit for being game, funny, bitchy and snotty. She’s talking trash about the Met Gala and her 1970s bush, etc. Skip ahead to like 4 minutes if you want to avoid all of the Aussie lead-up drama. Around the 10-minute mark, Goop talks about her bush.

Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.

I have an assortment of Gwyneth Paltrow news for you today, and all of it is super-special and goopy, of course. First, some assorted Met Gala stuff. Gwyneth only deigned to attend the Met Gala because her BFF Beyonce was co-chair of the gala, and even then, Gwyneth refused to participate in the charade (Goop pronounces it “sha-rawd”) of a “punk” theme and she just went with a pink princess gown instead. But it seems that the Met Gala was not even good enough for Dame Goop:

Not even A-listers have the best time at the Costume Institute ball. Just ask Gwyneth Paltrow, who attended Monday’s star-studded gala in Valentino. Her pal Beyoncé was the honorary co-chair and wore Givenchy.

“I’m never going again. It was so un-fun. It was boiling. It was too crowded. I did not enjoy it at all,” says Paltrow.

And Paltrow’s husband, Chris Martin, was also there, but the two did not walk the carpet together because they try to keep their relationship as “private” as possible, Paltrow explained.

[From USA Today]

Poor Goop! What a horrible turn of events. It was THE WORST! She deserves some kind of medal for courageously braving this epic tragedy. As for Gwyneth’s current taste level… well, Entertainment Weekly asked Gwyneth to choose her “best dressed” of the Met Gala and she chose… Miranda Kerr? The hell? Goop said: “She was wearing a black Michael Kors dress that was sort of like a sparkling bandeau, and her whole stomach was showing. It was really beautiful. It was a little punk-y. She’s just so pretty, it’s abnormal. I was like, ‘Is it weird to be that pretty?’ And she was like, ‘No.’” Seriously, Gwyneth? Miranda was the best dressed? And she thinks Miranda is abnormally pretty? I don’t get it.

And lastly, we have this wonderful story about Gwyneth trying to keep the peasant hordes away from her Brentwood estate:

Gwyneth Paltrow looks down at her neighbors … from a gate that’s illegally high … so says a pissed-off homeowner who’s filed a complaint over her above-it-all entrance.

TMZ has learned … one of Gwyneth’s Brentwood neighbors claims she and hubby Chris Martin built a 9-foot-tall gate in front of their mansion — WAY ABOVE the legal limit of 6 feet — and it’s an eyesore.

The angry neighbor says no other residents — including fellow celebs Harrison Ford, Oliver Stone, and Courtney Thorne-Smith — have gates over 6 feet tall, so why should Gwyneth?

The L.A. City Department of Building and Safety confirmed that it’s investigating, and Gwyneth will have 45 days to fix any violations … or face more than $900 in fines.

About the cost of a shirt on GOOP.

[From TMZ]

Yeah, my guess is that Gwyneth is just going to eat the $900 fine and keep her enormous gate. THE PEASANTS ARE COMING!! And they have ladders! Here’s a question: how many properties does Gwyneth have at this point? There’s her London home, a NYC loft (I think?), this Brentwood mansion and I think she has an orchard or something in the Hamptons too. WTF?

Photos courtesy of WENN.

This is pretty much the only photo that exists of Chris Martin and Gwyneth Paltrow within three feet of each other at the Met Gala on Monday night. Did you even know Chris was there? I figured Goop was flying solo, as she almost always does. But Chris was there, he just got all dolled up in tuxedo and then decided not to even walk the carpet. The header photo comes from someone’s Twitter page. Why do they still insist on doing this after a decade together? I do think it’s mostly HIM, not her. At this point, I think Gwyneth would kind of like it if Chris would publicly support her on a red carpet. He just refuses. Maybe because – as Gwyneth continues to say in interview after interview – their marriage isn’t all that awesome.

But Gwyneth did hang out with Taylor Swift at the event – you can see the photos here. Gwyneth and Swifty have been friends for a few years, and I think Gwyneth set Swifty up with Jake Gyllenhaal. Which is still funny to me. She also got to hand out with Psy a little bit. Psy also tweeted separate photos of Goop and Chris. I love the Chris photo because the ghostly visage of Kim Kardashian is behind them.

As for Gwyneth’s Valentino tragedy in Pepto-pink, Dame Goop deigned to tell Vogue: “I guess it’s punk in that I’ve gone just totally classic on a punk night.” Oh, Gwyneth calls her own gown “completely classic”?! I’m surprised she didn’t say “My friends tell me that it’s quite punk to wear such a beautiful, flattering, classic gown that looks so amazing on me.”

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet, WENN, Twitter.

It’s not that I think Gwyneth Paltrow’s pink Valentino gown is the worst. It’s far from the worst. It’s just that… I expect more from her, I think. This gown seems like she was phoning it in at last night’s Met Gala. I don’t understand how a self-respecting (self-adoring, actually) Fashion Girl wears this to a punk-themed Met Gala. You know what it is? Four or five years ago, if Gwyneth had to go to a major fashion event with a punk theme, she would have gone all out and punked-out. But now that she’s a lifestyle maven trying to appeal to middle-America moms, she feels she can’t go that far. So she plays it safe in an ugly pink Valentino. Goop, you disappoint me.

Also disappointing? Carey Mulligan in this completely blah Balenciaga. It’s a cute dress, it looks okay on her, and it would have been perfectly suitable for one of the premieres or screenings of The Great Gatsby, but it looks out of place for the Met Gala. She looks miserable too. What’s up with her lately? She always looks like she’s about to cry.

And what the hell is Anna Wintour wearing? This is Chanel. And it’s not punk at all.

Photos courtesy of WENN.