Stylish Celebrity Escapism
Contributing Writers


Page 15 of 17« First...«1314151617»


Sep 11
'06
Diddy ordered to change his name again


Diddy, the “richest person in hip-hop,” has changed his name several times in an effort to rebrand himself and clean up mistakes from his past name changes.

In August, 2005 he changed his name to just “Diddy,” but he was born Sean John Combs and puts out a clothing line under the “Sean Jean” name. He previously called himself Puff Daddy, P. Diddy and Puffy, and may have had to get rid of his “Puffy” moniker after having legal issues with the Japanese band “Puffy AmiYumi.”

Now Diddy has been ordered to change his name again, because it conflicts with a British music producer who also goes by Diddy. He also has to pay damages to the guy:

HIP HOP star Sean “Diddy” Combs must change his name again — and pay substantial damages to a music producer already named Diddy.

London-based Richard “Diddy” Dearlove yesterday won a High Court challenge for sole use over the nickname.

Combs, 36, used to call himself Puff Daddy before relaunching under P Diddy — then changing his name to just Diddy.

The court settlement means he must rebrand himself in the UK.

Dearlove is known in clubland for his remixes of classics such as Blondie’s hit Atomic.

Why doesn’t he just go by Sean Jean? That would be a lot easier, and people won’t have to remember what name to call him this month. More money, more name changes, more problems.

Posted in Lawsuits, P. Diddy

Written by Celebitchy         4 Comments »
Sep 6
'06
Nick Lachey gets screwed in his divorce settlement


Nick Lachey and Jessica Simpson’s divorce was finalized in early July. Nick was offered an insulting $1.5 million settlement by Jessica’s creepy father, Joe Simpson, in early June. The couples joint assets are valued at well over $30 million, so that was truly a piss poor amount. (Albeit one that would change most anyone else’s life.)

Nick was said to be holding out for a relatively paltry $8 million, which he lowered to just $5 million.

Now Nick and Jessica have reached an undisclosed settlement, but Nick’s share is said to be well less than half of the couple’s assets:

TMZ has learned that Jessica Simpson and Nick Lachey have divided up the assets in their marriage, and Nick agreed to less than his share in order to avoid an ugly court fight.

The couple amassed a fortune during their three-year marriage, in no small part because of their MTV reality show “Newlyweds” and the avalanche of endorsements and other deals that followed. Jessica refused to sign a prenuptial agreement, so under California law the assets — estimated at $36 million — are to be divided equally. So Jessica and Nick should each get $18…

Sources say in the property settlement — which has not yet been filed in court — Nick will take significantly more than the $1.5 million, but considerably less than 50% of what he and Jessica earned during the marriage. Two sources in Nick’s camp made it clear to TMZ that Lachey agreed to end the dispute because he does not want to hurt anyone in a contentious court battle.

Lachey’s people could have leaked that news to make him seem like a good guy, but he is a good guy. There’s no blaming Simpson, since she generally seems to do what people tell her and simple math is probably way above her head. Now she’ll have more cash to buy terrible ill-fitting fashion thanks to her daddy playing hardball.

Here is Jessica in NY yesterday. Photos courtesy of SweetKisses.net

Posted in Divorces, Jessica Simpson, Lawsuits, Nick Lachey, Photos

Written by Celebitchy         4 Comments »
Sep 5
'06
Jennifer Aniston and Courteney Cox at a party


Jennifer Aniston and Courteney Cox were photographed canoodling at a party in Malibu over the weekend. I’m not sure who the older woman is, but Aniston is majorly sucking up to her while Courteney looks kind of annoyed. Aniston is also all too aware that she’s being photographed.

No wonder Aniston is so self-conscious around the paparrazi. She just settled a lawsuit for an undisclosed amount with a photographer who took topless photos of her sunbathing at her place. Aniston is going to donate the settlement to cancer research, cause she realizes that she’s not known for charity work and better improve her public image fast.

The paparrazo’s defense is pretty weak and kind of laughable. He said that he “didn’t go looking” for Aniston topless, even though he was outside her house with a telephoto lens, and that he uh, didn’t want to sell the naked pictures, even though he mailed them to magazines.

In his own defense, Brandt claimed that he was only trying to cash in on photos of Aniston and her friend–as opposed to Aniston’s “friends.”

“What I was trying to sell was the pictures of Vince and her…Sending the topless pictures along with [the other photos] was maybe my mistake,” Brandt told ABC News Radio in December. “But I wasn’t intending to sell those.”

The photographer claimed he was taken by surprise when the actress appeared in his viewfinder sans top, but denied that he was trespassing at the time he caught his eyeful.

“She’s the one who went out there topless,” Brandt said. “I didn’t go looking for it.”

He said he was standing about 300 yards away from Aniston’s Hollywood Hills home, on a public street at the time he took the shots.

In a statement Friday, the photographer’s rep reiterated Brandt did nothing illegal to obtain the images.

“Even though they were legally obtained (no trees were climbed or trespassing done), Peter pulled the photos from publication,” the statement read.

This is Aniston’s second settlement with a photographer over nude photos. She got 1/2 a million dollars in 2003 for nude pictures of her that were taken and published in 1999. No word what she did with that cash.

Here are Aniston and Cox at the party. [via]

Posted in Courteney Cox, Jennifer Aniston, Lawsuits, Parties, Photos

Written by Celebitchy         9 Comments »
Aug 2
'06
Lindsay Lohan in a see through top


Lindsay Lohan probably thinks it’s cute or whatever to wear her Pink Taco boyfriend’s undershirt out in public for all the paparrazi to see. She could have fit one of those white diaphanous shirts she likes to wear into one of her giant purses for the day after, but it was already stuffed full with three bikinis.

Lohan is probably going to have to give a statement in the suit against her mother, Dina, who is being sued for switching Lohan’s record label to get a more high-profile deal. Now that Lohan’s music and acting career is taking a nosedive, that settlement is going to be worth a lot less.

Here is Lohan looking all busy and unable to balance her accessories while gleefully showing off her store-bought goodies. Her shirt isn’t as see-through as Jessica Simpson’s, but she’s working with what was in her boyfriend’s closet.

Posted in Lawsuits, Lindsay Lohan, Photos

Written by Celebitchy         See post for comments
Jul 24
'06
Kate Hudson at the Australian “You, Me, and Dupree” premiere


“You, Me, and Dupree” is not doing so bad at the box office, and is in fourth place on its second weekend out. “Pirates” is still kicking ass at first place, of course. “You Me, and Dupree” is supposed to royally suck, though, and is getting panned by critics.

Kate Hudson won a recent libel award from the British arm of The National Enquirer. Celebrities sue the British and Irish offshoots of US gossip magazines to get around US libel laws, which shield publications from damages unless it can be proven that they acted from malice. (So basically the US gossip rags can make shit up and no one can sue them.) Britney Spears is now suing 8 gossip magazines from offshore in the hopes of scoring some cash to feed her estranged husband’s fast lifestyle.

Hudson was refuting a report that she was dangerously thin and that her mother, Goldie Hawn, was worried for her health. She won an undisclosed settlement from the magazine.

Here is Hudson looking like an elf at the July 23rd Australian premiere of “You, Me, and Dupree” with annoying Owen Wilson. She shouldn’t wear her hair back because it certainly isn’t flattering to her face. [via]

Posted in Hair, Kate Hudson, Lawsuits, Movies, Premieres

Written by Celebitchy         2 Comments »
Jul 2
'06
Britney says “My pictures were stolen too! Really!”


Britney Spears claims the glowing happy pictures that came out in US Weekly of her posing with Kevin were, like, totally stolen. She’s said to be “evaluating legal options” against the magazine. You know that Britney released the photos herself after her “Dateline” debacle, and is just saying that to make it seem like they’re really stolen:

Britney Spears has said she is “outraged and saddened” after holiday photos of her family were published in a US magazine.

Her record label Jive said the photos were stolen and that Spears and husband Kevin Federline were “evaluating all of their legal options”.

The statement said the photos were stolen by “an unknown perpetrator” and printed by Us Weekly magazine without the couple’s “knowledge or consent”.

We seriously doubt this is true because the pictures are all cute and seem to come at a time when she needs good publicity and wants to make it seem as if everything is fine in her marriage. It’s also seems like too much of a coincidence when compared with the recently leaked Brangelina baby shower pics.

Reader Missy notes that Britney and Kevin may look happy and privileged in these pictures taken on a private jet, but that Kevin is suspiciously hiding his ring finger. Someone must have “forgotten” to wear their wedding ring.

Posted in Babies, Britney Spears, Kevin Federline, Lawsuits, Photos

Written by Celebitchy         3 Comments »
Jul 2
'06
Camera repair guys who leaked Brangelina pics didn’t do anything illegal


You’ve undoubtedly heard about the Brangelina baby shower pics that were released to a few blogs and media outlets with the promise of 450 more. It turns out that Angelina’s kissing brother, James Haven, took his camera to BestBuy in LA but forgot to remove the memory card. BestBuy outsourced the job to Precision Camera in Enfield, Connecticut, where two guys thought they hit the jackpot. They might have, if they would have been smart enough to take basic precautions like using a proxy server and an anonymous e-mail address. Instead they used an easily traceable account and the feds raided their place of employment and one of their homes to recover the pictures. They probably would have been caught anyway, but it might have taken a couple of extra days.

They dodged a legal bullet since it was determined they didn’t do anything illegal:

“It’s something that happened at work. I don’t really have much to say,” Beckwith told the Herald last night.

“I work at Precision and hopefully I’ll still work there tomorrow,” said Beckwith, a stocky man in his early 20s with tribal tattoos on his shoulders and arms. “They questioned people at work.”

Pressed for more details, Beckwith said, “You’ll have to talk to Bill about that,” referring to Keyes. Westfield cops and Secret Service agents from Boston, working at the request of LAPD detectives and the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office, raided Keyes’ home Tuesday night and recovered the images, which have been returned to Pitt and Jolie, sources said.

“We were looking for the memory stick from the camera. We got it. We got the pictures. We got everything,” a law enforcement source said.

Westfield police said the men violated no Massachusetts laws but may be charged in California, which has anti-paparazzi measures on the books.

What I want to know is why the secret service got involved in a stupid celebrity photo leak case. How much taypayer money did that cost?

The two guyswho leaked the pictures, Bill Keyes, 36, and Adam Beckwith, 20 something, may not be arrested or charged, but Brangelina’s lawyers are out for blood and they’re going to get them to pay. Hopefully they’ll get some decent pro bono support and will be able to avoid being sued.

Here are the Brangelina baby shower pics.

Posted in Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt, Brangelina, Lawsuits, Photos

Written by Celebitchy         1 Comment »
Jul 2
'06
J.Lo’s ex claims she does voodoo on people


J.Lo’s first ex husband, Ojani Noa, is unable to publish a tell-all book about their relationship now that Lopez won a case against him publishing the book. He signed a confidentiality agreement with Lopez in late 2005 as part of his settlement payout for a breach of contract lawsuit against her. Noa claimed that Lopez had him unfairly fired from his manager position at her Pasadena restaurant, Madre’s.

In April Noa told Lopez’s attorneys that he’d put the book out unless she paid him a cool $5 million. Of course the diva wasn’t having that and sued him in an attempt to block the book, which is said to have juicy details like J.Lo cheating on P.Diddy in 1999 with Marc Anthony. Unfortunately J.Lo was successful and we won’t be able to get our hands on the novel, but one detail did come out: Noa claims Lopez does Santeria on her enemies to get back at them:

During a June 5 deposition, Noa, who was married to Lopez for about 11 months, gave an indication of the kind of material Lopez does not want published. Responding to a question from the actress’s attorney, Noa (who remained friendly with his ex following their split) testified that Lopez “was doing voodoo when we weren’t married. She was doing bad things to a lot of people when we were friends. And I knew all this time, because we did personally, me and her, to this particular lady.” Noa added that Lopez did voodoo and “all this religious bullshit” to former lovers, including Sean “Puffy” Combs. The purported voodoo practices apparently stem from Lopez’s religious devotion and the influence over her by a “Madrina,” which is often described as a spiritual mentor for Santeria practitioners. Asked in a June 1 deposition why he thought he could keep selling stories about Lopez despite signing the six-figure settlement agreement, Noa said, “I mean, I live a free country. No? I can express myself. I can talk and say whatever I want to. No?”

I believe this, because Lopez was said to have consulted a Santeria advisor at the time of her upcoming wedding to Ben Affleck. The voodoo guru told her to call it off:

Jennifer Lopez is said to seek spiritual advice from Santerian priestess Merle Gonzalez, who has admitted the two are friends. She reportedly told Lopez to call off her wedding to Ben Affleck.

Santeria fuses Roman Catholic beliefs with traditional West African religions. It’s preserved by an oral tradition and rituals involve animal sacrifice, dancing, chanting and magic spells. Animals,usually chickens, are sacrificed to bring good luck and forgiveness of sins, and to please the saints.

That’s pretty funny and we hope more dirt gets released on Lopez even though the book was blocked. If she’s gullible enough to believe in voodoo, maybe Lea Remini will successfully convert her to Scientology.

Here she is in the videoshoot for “I’m gonna be alright,” which was released in 2002. [via]

Posted in Cults, J.Lo, Jennifer Lopez, Lawsuits, Photos

Written by Celebitchy         3 Comments »
Jun 26
'06
Britney to sue 8 tabloids from offshore for maximum results


Britney is planning to sue 8 different tabloids for reporting that her marriage is in trouble, but she’s not going to do it from the states, where celebrities are considered public personalities and are fair game by law - she’s filed suit in Ireland, where her chances of winning are much higher:

BELFAST is looking to challenge London as the libel capital of the world as some of America’s biggest stars, including the singers Britney Spears and Whitney Houston, prepare to sue through its courts.

Spears is to sue the National Enquirer, based in Florida, for reports that her marriage to Kevin Federline was at an end. She is also suing seven other US and British publications that repeated the claims.

Foreign claimants have long been attracted to London because of the strict libel laws, but Belfast offers the prospect of high payouts, faster justice and lower costs.

Paul Tweed, senior partner at Johnson’s solicitors, who has been instructed by Spears, said he was also being consulted by Houston, Paula Abdul, the singer, and Steve Bing, film producer and father of Liz Hurley’s son Damian…

One law firm, which represents American celebrities suing in London, said: “They come to the UK because it is a good place to sue. In the US there is a public figure defence which means that if you have celebrity status you can’t sue anybody in America unless you can show that they acted from malice.”

Paul Tweed, senior partner at Johnson’s solicitors, who has been instructed by Spears, said he was also being consulted by Houston, Paula Abdul, the singer, and Steve Bing, film producer and father of Liz Hurley’s son Damian.

Belfast has similar libel laws to England, but waiting lists are shorter and the costs can be 75% lower. Many cases go to juries, which make higher awards. In one Belfast case Barney Eastwood, the boxing promoter, received an award of £450,000, the highest in Irish legal history.

If an American publication does not have assets in Britain, Tweed sues distributors and website hosts. He is currently taking action against Yahoo!

It doesn’t seem fair that celebrities can just file suit from England or Ireland in order to get around US libel laws, but major corporations avoid paying taxes by incorporating overseas. Exploiting tax and legal loopholes is just one of the ways that people hold onto their undeserved millions.

Here is Britney with Sean Preston and her mom and sister outside of Nobu. K-Fed was there, too, but is not pictured. There was supposedly a paparrazi fight as photographers jockied for pictures of the pregnant star. TMZ has a video of it, with people saying “back off” and swearing, but it doesn’t seem as exciting as they make it out to be. We were hoping for some punches and hair-pulling.

Pictures and tabloid story [via]

Posted in Babies, Britney Spears, Lawsuits, Photos

Written by Celebitchy         2 Comments »
Jun 13
'06
Paris back with Stavros; gets sued for multi-car accident


Paris’ car trouble just doesn’t end. She was videotaped backing her SUV into a honda in a parking lot this weekend, and now she’s getting sued for a multi-car pileup in LA. Paris wasn’t driving and wasn’t in the car - her cousin caused the accident with Paris’ car. (If Paris was around, you would have heard of this already.) The suit claims she’s legally responsible, though:

The incident allegedly occurred in May, 2004. Brooke Ashley Brinson, who identified herself at the scene as Paris Hilton’s cousin, was driving the Mercedes that was registered to Hilton. The heiress was not in the car.

According to the suit, “Traffic began to slow down and all vehicles came to a stop for traffic ahead.” The lawsuit alleges that the defendant’s car failed to stop, causing a chain collision involving four cars. The plaintiffs, Ivan Alvarez, Monica Delgado and their child, Nicholas Alvarez, were two cars in front of the Mercedes.

TMZ spoke with the plaintiffs’ lawyer, Mauro Fiore, Jr., who said his two adult clients suffered “serious injuries.”

Fiore says he filed a claim with Hilton’s insurance company, and was shocked to learn that Hilton had the bare minimum coverage for property damage — $5,000. Hilton’s insurance company refused to disclose her policy limits for personal injury.

Fiore says he wants $250,000 for each plaintiff but the insurance company refuses to pay a dime.

There are two other lawsuits pending against Paris. One is a $10 million defamation case filed by Zeta Graff. Paris falsely claimed that Graff attacked her at a London club in July of last year and arranged to have the story leaked to the tabloids.

Another lawsuit is by party planner Brian Quintana, who Paris called a “dirty Mexican” and reportedly harassed after Quintana is said to have told Paris’ boyfriend, Stavros Niarchos III, to dump her to get back with Mary-Kate Olsen. Quintana said he would drop the suit if Paris would show up at the opening of one of his clubs. We’re not sure if Paris followed through, but it means that she could avoid at least one of the three lawsuits against her, not that the careless party girl cares much.

And Paris may be back with Stavros for the third time, because the two were spotted buying DVDs together. They seem to have picked up Kathy Griffin’s comedy DVD.

Since splittling with Stavros in early May she was linked shortly with NFL quarterback Matt Leinart and with the hot guy who played her love interested in her new music video.

Stavros is said to have begged Paris to take him back, and to have sampled Lindsay Lohan’s spicy wares.

Here is Paris making sure the paparrazi get a shot of her new CD as she heads to a pilates class in Brentwood. [via] Paris and Stavros picture [via]

Posted in Lawsuits, Paris Hilton

Written by Celebitchy         1 Comment »
Page 15 of 17« First...«1314151617»
Recent Comments:
  • Syko: I wouldn’t give the old bastard another chance. But it might be entertaining, if Dave’s still...
  • Mairead: There’s “telling it like it is” and there’s being a miserable git. Marky Mark has...
  • SeVen: 1) If Tobey Maguire was involved, hes a tit. There is probably tons of other patches around town that are less...
  • emmma: omg. they are so cute!<3 love these pics :-)
  • hope: Right. She is not even in LA enough to be visiting hospital 3 times a week.It would’ve been more...
  • Bros: talk about a great job. you would definitely wake up and look forward to going to work.
  • Jody: Did her depression lead to that self fondling in the header pic? Star Jones is a sad individual.
  • Codzilla: This made my day, for sure.
 
 

Celebitchy is a celebrity gossip site written by several independent authors. The opinions of the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Celebitchy, LLC. All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Articles are based on rumor, conjecture, and published information in other sources. Celebitchy, LLC makes no claims that content is valid, accurate, or true. Celebitchy, LLC and the authors contributing to it will not be held liable for damages resulting from errors, omissions or falsehoods published on this site. It is not the site or the contributing authors' intention to defame or malign any particular group, religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual. Celebitchy, LLC is not responsible for content on linked or quoted sources. All comments made by visitors to the blog are the responsibility of their respective authors and are only sporadically monitored. Celebitchy, LLC will not be held liable for comments in any way.