BOO!! Ewan McGregor has just announced in a new interview that he will no longer be doing nude scenes. His theory is that his costars always stay around the same age, and now that he’s about to turn 40 years old (on March 31), he doesn’t want to be the smarmy older actor who is always strutting his Scottish dong around the film set. So… it seems like his reasoning is feministic, and yet I feel like his old reasoning – that he was getting naked “for the sisters” – was more feminist. But, hey, that’s just me. I love Scottish dong.

JUST days before reaching his 40th birthday Ewan McGregor has announced he’s banning himself from appearing naked on film ever again.

The Star Wars actor, who reaches the landmark on March 31, insists he wants to avoid the embarrassment of bedding considerably younger women on the big screen in the coming years. McGregor has been obliged to take part in a string of sex scenes during his movie career, romping with co-stars including Scarlett Johansson, Eva Green and Naomi Watts.

Now the Scot says he doesn’t want to follow the example of other leading Hollywood men, who have continued to be seen romancing significantly younger women on film, despite advancing years.

“I’m getting older and the actresses stay younger,” he acknowledges. “I don’t want to become Clint Eastwood, where his love interests seem 50 years younger than him. You never want female co-stars to feel like you’re taking advantage of the situation. Anyhow, sex scenes are terribly exposing and rarely of any use in learning about character.”

Despite his new self-imposed nude ban Ewan, who is married with three children, does not regret stripping off in such films as Trainspotting and Velvet Goldmine.

“It’s all about life,” says McGregor. “We’re naked at the end of the day and we’re sometimes naked in the middle of the day – if we’re lucky. It may seem like I’m obsessed with sex but it’s actually the opposite.”

His latest film assignment opposite a leading lady is proving rather more bruising than previous encounters, it seems. Ewan stars alongside 28-year-old Gina Carano in the thriller Haywire – and his character was recently photographed taking a sound beating from the American Gladiator star during a scene filmed on Malibu beach.

[From Express UK]

So, I’ve always kept it in my mind that Ewan said he did it for the sisters, but I could never remember where I had gotten that. Finally, I found the old interview he did with E! News’ Jules Asner. This clip has made my day:

GOD, I love the way he calls her “darling”. Also, “naughty”. That’s enough for me. I can finish myself off on those two words alone.

Photos courtesy of Fame & WENN.

Yesterday we got an e-mail from someone claiming that there was a big conspiracy by some ex friends of Vanessa Hudgens to systematically leak nude photos of her prior to every movie she had coming out. This has happened over three years, where every time Vanessa has a film she needs to promote we just happen to see nude photos of her online. It’s dumb and predictable, but what’s more ridiculous is this long e-mail trying to finger two of Vanessa’s ex friends for it. They sent this to us too, and Kaiser and I looked it over and made the decision not to publish it because it sounded like complete bullsh*t. The Superficial has posted it though, so we may as well add our two cents. This sounds like an excuse Vanessa cooked up. When people make up lies, there’s a tendency to oversell, and this is a definite oversell. I’m not going to include the whole e-mail here – you can read it at The Superficial, but here’s a segment.

In 2006, Kayslee and Alexa were close friends of Vanessa, but they later drifted apart due to Vanessa’s work commitments (The High School Musical movies). Vanessa was especially fond of Alexa, even inviting her to star in her debut music video, to make up for the fact that she had been too busy to spend time with her.

Later that year, Alexa suggested that Vanessa take some racy pictures to keep her boyfriend interested. Vanessa agreed and privately took some naked photos of herself. Kayslee then took photos of Vanessa and Alexa kissing. Alexa and Kayslee took no nude photos of themselves.

Vanessa took more nude photos that year and the next, but she was careful and deleted the pictures from her mobile phone. Vanessa uploaded her pictures to her email account and sent them to her boyfriend, like Alexa had suggested. On one of these occasions, she did this while she was at Alexa’s house. Alexa downloaded the pictures onto her computer when Vanessa accidentally left her email account logged in.

Since September 2007, Alexa and her friend Kayslee have been leaking Vanessa’s pictures every time she has movie coming out. I believe this is because of them being jealous of her successful movie career.

[Received via e-mail, entire version on The Superficial]

I used the social media search tool Spokeo to run the e-mail address this was sent from and it turned up no accounts associated with this address. There was also a Flickr account mentioned in this e-mail to show that one of the girls named here was friends with Hudgens or something. The Flickr account did exist, but there’s no google cache of it and it doesn’t prove anything.

So according to that e-mail, Vanessa wasn’t the one who decided to take those sexy pictures, it was her friend’s idea and her friend’s fault and there’s this big conspiracy to leak the photos to get her publicity before every movie. These girls are just “jealous” of her career, which is such an incredibly predictable cliche excuse.

Then there’s also this drama going on with the story of some ring of hackers allegedly targeting celebrities. (At first TMZ reported it was just women, then their story changed.) TMZ now claims that a bunch of celebrities, sports stars and politicians were victims and the FBI is looking into it. The FBI could be looking into Vanessa’s case, but what does that prove other than the fact that someone contacted them on her behalf? I used to think TMZ was pretty solid when it came to sources, but they regularly run stories from celebrities, like Lohan and Gibson, and act like they’re true without questioning them at all. This story stinks to high heaven.

If this elaborate hacker ring story is true, why haven’t we seen any photos other than Vanessa’s? Granted maybe she had the best ones, but why haven’t we seen any leaked e-mails then? It just seems like yet another smokescreen her people are using to try and deflect from the conclusion that she’s doing this herself. It’s far fetched and doesn’t add up, just like that dumb e-mail. Read what TMZ wrote:

The hackers who are now being investigated by the FBI for allegedly pilfering nude photos and videos of 50 Hollywood celebrities have also been targeting sports stars and D.C.’s most powerful.

Sources connected to the hackers tell TMZ … the cyber-crooks currently have 100 active email addresses of celebrities, politicians and sports stars. We do not know the identity of the sports stars or politicians, but they are all high-profile.

TMZ broke the story … the hackers have snagged nude photos and videos from female stars including Vanessa Hudgens, Scarlett Johansson, Jessica Alba, Christina Aguilera, Ali Larter and Demi Lovato. There are no male celebs on the list.

The FBI knows the identity of the ringleader, law enforcement sources tell TMZ.

As for Vanessa Hudgens, our sources say the hackers may have obtained the pictures and videos through a friend who betrayed the actress.

[From TMZ]

So, according to this story there was a ring of hackers and they targeted a bunch of celebrities but Vanessa’s photos are the only ones that got out. Vanessa’s friends knew these hackers and just gave them her photos where the other celebrities whose e-mails and photos we haven’t seen were hacked by the same people. (And even assuming that the “friend’s” e-mail account storing Vanessa’s photos was hacked, how the hell would they know which random e-mail to break into?) Does that make any sense at all? TMZ adds the air of legitimacy to it with the story that the FBI is investigating, but maybe that’s just for Vanessa’s case and the rest of this story is a trumped up excuse.

Photos are from 3/17/11. Credit: Fame

The first time some nude photos of Vanessa Hudgens leaked in 2007 her profile was raised immensely. It all seemed very convenient for a Disney star hoping to sex up her image. Her lawyers did send out letters to blogs asking us to take them down but that wasn’t until May, 2008 and those photos came out in September, 2007. What’s more is that another set of nude photos of Vanessa came out in August, 2009, coincidentally right before she had a movie coming out, Bandslam. Now we’re seeing a third set of nude Vanessa Hudgens photos (most sites have removed them, but you can see them here, very NSFW) and lo and behold, she has two movies out this month. A quick glance at her IMDB page confirms that she hasn’t had a movie out since Bandslam in 2009, which just happened to be the last time we saw nude photos of her. But it’s all a conspiracy to leak photos of Vanessa at the same time she has something to promote. Her lawyer said she’s “deeply upset and angered” that these nude photo releases just happen to work in Hudgens’ favor every damn time.

Always beware the ides of March. For Vanessa Hudgens, that meant dealing with the leak of a brand-new batch of shocking nude photos, which blazed the web on Tuesday March 15.

It’s not the first time the Sucker Punch actress, 22, has dealt with similar pics. Reportedly self-taken, nude photos were released without authorization first in 2007 — and another batch in 2009.

“Vanessa is deeply upset and angered that these old photos, which were taken years ago, continue to resurface,” the star’s attorney, Christopher Wong, tells UsMagazine.com in a statement.

No word yet on who is behind the leak, or how they got a hold of the R-rated photos in the place.

Continues Wong: “It is particularly disturbing that whoever got hold of these private photos seems to be intent on illegally leaking them out over a long period of time. We are actively working with law enforcement to determine who is responsible and hold them accountable for their actions.”

[From US Weekly]

I’m not buying it, and the photos are X rated, not R, in that she’s showing her lady bits in one. Vanessa loves to pose for photos like this, she just did a super cheesy “sexy” shoot for Details, and she loves the fact that people are ogling her and talking about her. This is her go-to method when she needs to get publicity and it sort-of works for her. We talk about her, but it’s not like people are running out to see her movies.

Vanessa Hudgens is shown on 3/14 and 3/2/11. Credit: WENN.com

E! News has this barely interesting story about the Breaking Dawn shoot, which as you may know is still in Brazil at this point (we saw photos yesterday). I wouldn’t be writing about it if E! didn’t also include – as a side note – an absolutely hysterical quote from an insider on the production. First, the main story: K-Stew/Bella is going to be naked in the film. Sort of. Sources say that Breaking Dawn’s director, Bill Condon (Nine, Chicago) is very much into shooting the “honeymoon” scenes realistically, so K-Stew will have to be naked a lot, and then they’ll just cut around the boobs and stuff so that they can get a PG-13 rating, while still keeping it hot. “Eh” on that story. The really funny part is when they’re discussing the wedding scene, and the state of Bella’s wedding gown:

Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart have taken their love down south. The on- and offscreen couple are heating up Brazil, shooting Bella and Edward’s honeymoon scenes for Breaking Dawn. So you know what that means right? Robsten are finally doing it! At least, for you to all enjoy on screen.

As we’ve already dished, there is going to be more sex (finally!) in the last Twilight flicks. Even though it will have a PG-13 rating, the studio is leaving a lot up to director Bill Condon to decide how to shoot the racy stuff. But if Bill sticks to the script, we’re told by sources on set that one Twilight star is going to be stripping down…way down.

“The script actually has Kristen practically naked in it, a lot,” ‘fesses a source who took a peek (at the script, not K.Stew, sickos).

Obviously you won’t see Stewart’s bod actually end up on the big screen, (remember as our source emphasizes “rating is key”), but Condon is the type of director who likes to keep it real, shoot it real, then edit it in a way that is über-hot when it hits theaters.

Hey, Kristen has done it for roles before, and we all know she’s super comfortable around Rob. Only complaint? Let’s make it equal and have R.Pattz equally bare. Yeah?

Oh, and some not-so-hot news from down south: Apparently the wedding dress Bella wears isn’t as hot as the sex scenes.

“It’s hideous,” dishes our insider. “And it’s not the designer’s fault. Let’s just say someone who has final say on the matter has decided upon a terribly conservative and ugly gown.”

[From E! News]

They’re talking about Stephenie Meyer, correct? She’s a producer now, and she must have pulled rank to ensure that Bella would end up in some cheesy-ass wedding gown monstrosity. Ha!

Regarding the nudity though – yes, it should be equal. If Bella has to vadge it up, Sparkles should have to sparkledong it up. Fair is fair. Since I haven’t read the books, can someone answer me this: does Sparkles have a sparkledong? You know, since his skin sparkles in sunlight, if his dong ever saw sunlight, would it sparkle? This is all I care about at this moment.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

I like Claudia Schiffer, I really do. I like how she transitioned from being one of the best supermodels of her day to being a London mother and wife, to director and producer Matthew Vaughn (Layer Cake, Kick-Ass). Claudia is one of a kind, in my mind. So why do a cheap knock-off of Demi Moore’s famous Vanity Fair cover? Sure, Claudia looks amazing naked and pregnant. As did Demi. Is this the only way to pose a pregnant woman naked? Oh, and this was shot by Karl Lagerfeld too – how gauche, Karl. To completely jack something from Annie Leibovitz… Lagerfeld should be ashamed.

Proudly showing off her growing baby bump, supermodel Claudia Schiffer poses nude for the June cover of Vogue Germany. Chanel designer Karl Lagerfeld shot the glowing mom in a pose that is nearly identical to Demi Moore’s infamous 1991 Vanity Fair cover in which the actress posed in the buff at seven-months pregnant.

Schiffer, 39, who announced her pregnancy in January, is expecting a baby girl with husband, director Matthew Vaughn, in May. The couple are already parents to Caspar, 7, and Clementine, 5.

The model has credited her new life as a wife and mom to helping change the workaholic lifestyle she once had.

“I used to work every single day and travel round the world. I worked weekends, I never took one second off,” she told the Daily Mail. “When I met my husband I said, ‘You know what, this is important. I’m not going to work weekends any more.’ And when I had kids, I became even more careful. Modeling work is fine because you can do one day here, two days there – you’re never long gone.”

After marrying Vaughn in 2002, Schiffer said she put her career on hold to immediately start a family. After having their first child, the couple decided to have another “as soon as possible.”

“I love being pregnant,” she admitted. “You can do whatever you want. You don’t feel guilty, because I used to feel guilty about having a day off.”

“And, you know, something really strange happened to me. Before my pregnancies, I was someone who had to watch their weight. I had a personal trainer, I was working out, I would never eat anything sweet,” she continued. “Anyway, I got pregnant and when I was breastfeeding it just came off. I can eat whatever I want. If I don’t eat enough, I will lose weight.”

[From The New York Daily News]

Do you think she’ll name this baby a “C” name too? For a boy, I bet Lagerfeld is angling for “Carl”. As far as her being happiest while she’s pregnant, well, that shows. She looks gorgeous, and she’s one of those lucky bitches that looks absolutely amazing during her pregnancies. Oh, and I think her husband is really sexy too – Vaughn comes from a very aristocratic background, and he ended up friends with Guy Ritchie. After that friendship blossomed, he ended up becoming a major film producer in England, and then a major English director when directorial debut (Layer Cake) was a massive critical and word-of-mouth hit. Maybe I’m over-selling him as “really sexy”. He’s more like “nerd hot”. Here he is with Claudia and Brad Pitt:

German Vogue cover courtesy of HuffPo.

There’s a lot of hoopla over Heidi Klum’s latest comments about nudity, particularly in regards to her attitude about being naked around her family. The gorgeous German mother of four told Tatler Magazine that her parents were regularly naked at home and that she has no problem walking around her house without anything on. Before we get into her quotes, I just want to say that this is a very distinct cultural difference between Germans and Americans. What Heidi is describing about how her folks go nude when they need to be is completely the norm for a German household. I’m an American married to a Germany guy and have lived overseas for four years. Nudity is so common and matter of fact here and it can take some getting used to.

After almost 20 years as a supermodel, being undressed clearly comes naturally to Heidi Klum.
In fact, in a wide-ranging new interview, the 36-year-old reveals she is so relaxed about nudity she happily goes naked in front of her parents.

Miss Klum, who models for US fashion and lingerie label Victoria’s Secret and is thought to be worth around £10million, says: ‘I think it’s because I grew up in a very easy-going family where my parents were always naked.

‘My parents are still naked. I mean, it’s not like we’re hippies and we run around naked, but if they happened to be in their room changing or something or someone comes out of the shower, they’re not, like, “Oh my God. No. Close the door.”’

The German mother of four also tells Tatler magazine how she regularly renews her vows with her husband of six years, the British singer Seal.

‘He’s very old-fashioned, my husband. He’s very proper,’ she says. ‘We loved our wedding so much that we decided to do it every year, so that’s what we do.’

[From The Daily Mail]

I’ve never seen my parents naked, and as Americans we did the average thing and always made sure we were covered up when I was growing up. Now that I’ve lived in Germany for a few years I’ve definitely changed my attitude about nudity. They have these truly awesome public saunas in Germamy with saunas set at different temperatures, steam rooms, and water features in which everyone must be nude. In fact if you’re wearing a bathing suit they’ll tell you to take it off. The saunas are like 4-5 star resort quality for about 20 Euro a day and it’s well worth getting over your shame at being naked to use them. It bothered me at first to be naked and the first time I went I felt like I was in a nudist colony, but you get used to it. Nudity is cultural and there are some cultures that see at as natural and not necessarily sexual. That’s not to say that the Germans aren’t perverted in other ways.

Tatler magazine cover courtesy of CoverAwards.

Levi Johnston might be the biggest tease that ever lived. After spending too many months playing the “will you see my trouser antler?” game, the answer has finally come down — no, we will not see any kind of trouser antler, pocket moose, snowballs or Alaskan pole. We’ve covered some of the early releases of Levi’s teases, and now we have this epically boring cover to stare at. It doesn’t even look hunky! It makes Levi look like he has love handles. And, oh yeah, NO WANG. For shame.

Levi Johnston’s long-awaited Playgirl cover has finally been released, and the caribou hunter-turned-aspiring model/actor does live up to his promise and appear nude, but with one notable exception: He covers himself below the waist.

Titled “Levi Johnston Goes Rogue,” the pictorial also includes an interview with Johnston, 19, who has a 1-year-old son, Tripp, with Bristol Palin, 19, the daughter of former Alaska governor Sarah Palin.

In the interview portion of the spread, Johnston discusses his tumultuous relationship with the Palins, as well as being a new dad. The magazine, Playgirl’s debut re-launch issue, hits newsstands Feb. 22.

And for those who haven’t had their fill of Johnston, a pay-per-view special of Johnston from Playgirl airs on cable Feb. 12.

[From People]

Seriously, what’s the difference between this photo shoot and Levi doing some kind of kitschy shirtless calendar? Nothing. All cheese, no antler. Gawker did have fun with the cover, doing various re-edits of it, including a cartoon wang, a LOLcats version, and a “Cover Lies” version.

Oh, and would it kill Levi to shave? Seriously?

Playgirl cover courtesy of Gawker.

Jersey Shore’s most visible cast member, pint-sized overly bronzed Snooki, might be resorting to the tried and true method to extend her fifteen minutes: nude photos. Radar Online reports that they’ve seen photos and video of Snooki naked and it doesn’t sound like she leaves much to the imagination. One photo is described as “graphic.” (You guys were right, I gave this girl way too much credit.) We’ve already heard that Snooki’s castmate, J-Woww, has nude photos available. Neither Snooki or J-Woww’s pictures have been leaked online so they’re probably holding them close to their ample chests in order to get the highest payout. It sounds like Snooki is trying to one-up J-Woww with this latest offering. Snooki of course denies having any knowledge of the photos, which Radar Online claims were “self snapped.” The question is: did she take them for a boyfriend or for the media? Do I even need to ask that?

Nude shots and video of the MTV reality show star are being shopped around to different media outlets, reports RadarOnline.com.

Nicole (Snooki) Polizzi, who reportedly took the steamy shots and footage herself, appears in her bedroom in one photo, kneeling with one hand on the floor and the other grabbing her bed frame. And according to Radar, another photo is just too raunchy to describe.

But Polizzi seems to deny there are any such materials floating around.

“Idk [I don't know] where radar online comes up with their stories … weirdos,” the pint-sized reality star wrote on Twitter Tuesday after the story broke.

If the shots are the real deal, that would make Snooki the second “Jersey Shore” cast member to have naked pictures surface within the past week. Last Tuesday, Radar revealed that at least three nude shots of Jenni (JWoww) Farley were for sale.

On the show, which had its season finale two weeks ago, Polizzi often strutted around in short, skin-tight and low-cut dresses.

In the very first episode, she peeled off most of her clothes and took a dip in the hot tub in just her bra and thong. In another episode, Polizzi flashes her thong while doing backflips in a supershort dress on a club dance floor.

But while she didn’t mind showing some skin then, Polizzi did draw a line at some point.

While catching a piggyback ride from a guy on the Seaside boardwalk, she warned him, “I think my crotch is sticking out,” and asked to be put down.

“I’m not trashy,” she shared, “unless I drink too much.”

[From NY Daily News]

The last we reported on Snooki, she refused to even say hi to talk show host Jerry Springer while they were both at Foxwoods Casino, claiming she was “way classier than that.” It’s so classy to snub someone when you’re known for a reality show in which you regularly get drunk, make out with random guys and strip down to your underwear. Add some nude spread-eagle photos to the mix and Snooki is redefining classy!

I don’t want to hear about how Alexander Skarsgard is still with Kate Bosworth. I don’t want to hear about how he looks tired, or drawn, or that you don’t see it. Because it’s there. The hotness is there. He’s just… lovely. And sexy. And I’m not even watching True Blood! But I still see it.

Anyway, True Blood cast members have been giving some teaser interviews about the new season, and for True Blood diehards (cough CB cough) it’s sounding good. Like, Alexander Skarsgard totally naked good. Totally naked “a lot” good. Mmm….

Good news for True Blood fans!

We’re told we can expect much more nudity during season three of the hit HBO vampire series, which began filming again last month.

“A lot of people will be getting naked this season,” T.B.’s Todd Lowe (aka Terry Bellefleur) told us at the 16th Annual SAG Awards Saturday night.

In fact, according to castmate Carrie Preston, baring it all is especially a cinch for hunky 33-year-old Swede Alexander Skarsgård…

“Alex is not shy about getting naked at all!” said Preston, who plays Arlene Fowler. “And there will be lots of those kinds of scenes with Alex this season.”

Lowe said, “He’s already been naked a time or two so far since we’ve gotten back to filming.”

Nelsan Ellis, who plays same-sex-lovin’ Lafayette, said, “There are a lot of hunky dudes and beautiful women who have been added to the cast, so it doesn’t surprise me that more clothes are coming off.”

At the recent BAFTA/L.A. tea party, Sam Trammell, who’s already gone practically full frontal as Sam Merlotte, said he’d like to have a bigger share of the fangelicious hanky-panky.

“I’m not having any sex yet,” Trammell told us. “They really should provide Sam with more sex.”

But then he added, “There is a surprising—well, shocking—scene in the first episode. Some people will be happy and some people will not.”

[From E! News]

Sweet Jesus, I have got to start watching this show. It’s HBO, yes? I might have to break down and buy it. I’ll buy it if I’m guaranteed full frontal. Although… full frontal usually disappoints. Will I be disappointed with Alex? Hmm… I doubt it.

From what little I know about Sadie Frost, she seems pretty cool. Maybe not the best person over all, but she’s a hell of a lot more interesting than many of the cookie-cutter celebrities that take up so much dead space. Sadie is known as many things – an actress, the ex-wife of Jude Law and mother to his three oldest children, and as a cougar extraordinaire. Now, I know many people hate the use of “cougar”. But I think it applies here, because Sadie was doing it before women like her were called cougars. Sadie met Jude in 1994, when she was a 29-year-old actress with a husband and a child. Jude was 22 years old and about to break into the big time. She saw his potential not only as an actor, but as a husband, and after she divorced her first husband, she and Jude were happy until 2003, when they divorced.

Since then, Sadie makes the British tabloids consistently for her on-again-off-again relationships with younger men, for her friendships with other high profile celebrities, like Kate Moss and Daniel Craig, and for the occasional orgy. It seems that following her latest breakup, Sadie decided to pose nude for Grazia Magazine (which is a British tabloid magazine), and the photo is… quite nice, actually.

After a string of celebrities appearing on magazine covers photoshopped to within an inch of their lives, it is refreshing to hear that one star has ordered her pictures not be retouched.

It is even more admirable that Sadie Frost, who is best known for her partying days with Kate Moss and marriages to Jude Law and Gary Kemp, has also agreed to do the pictures naked.

Luckily for the 44-year-old mother-of-four, she has few blemishes to worry about.

But she also admitted: ‘I’m in my forties. I can’t believe it happened. I can’t make myself look any younger but I can do what I can to make myself look the best I can.’

Sadie, who is a vegetarian and who eats healthily, said she had been tempted in the past to look into surgery on her under-eye bags but said she now uses frozen peas on them instead.

The actress, model and designer, is now single after ending her relationship with Jackson Scott, who was 14 years her junior.

She was previously married to Gary Kemp (they split in 1995) and Jude Law (they divorced in 2003) and has also suffered from post-natal depression.

In 2002, her father David Vaughan also fell ill.

‘I couldn’t eat… I went down to about 7 stone and it was a very unhealthy place for me. I dealt with my sadness, my loss, my grief by going out drinking and partying. Everyone has an opinion. You may not be doing the right thing but you’re just doing anything to get through the pain.’

Sadie, who starred in a one-woman show last year, is appearing on stage in Fool For Love and Richard III in the next few weeks.

[From The Daily Mail]

As much as I enjoy Jude and Sienna together again, I’ve always secretly hoped that Sadie and Jude would end up back together. They make a lot of sense together, and I think he was at his best professionally and personally when he was with Sadie. Allegedly, they are still close, and I think Sadie still is a big part of his life. And you know what? Jude has done a lot worse. He should go back to her!