'10
Last week, Us Weekly was the first to report that Katy Perry and Russell Brand got engaged as they vacationed in India. This was later confirmed by both Brand and Perry, to various media outlets. Katy and Russell have only been dating for a few months, having perhaps their first hookup at, during or shortly after the 2009 VMAs last September. Even though it seemed very sudden, my most immediate thought was simply “crazy kids, it won’t last but it will be fun.” It didn’t even occur to me that the engagement was some kind of ode to old-fashioned tradition, because Katy Perry might be knocked up with a little Brand baby! Oh, God:
OK, Katy Perry, now you’ve got us curious.
Either we’re reading too much between the Tweets, or the 25-year-old “Kiss the Girl” singer is sprinkling clues she’s having a baby with new fiancé Russell Brand.
It started with her Jan. 1 message: “Let me tell you 2010 is BUMPIN!” Then on Friday, Perry wrote, “Hey @rustyrockets” – Brand’s Twitter name – “i heard ur prego-ed.” She adds, “I WANT IN AND OUT,” a Southern California hamburger chain, before telling Brand, “I love you … (awwwww barf!).”
Bump, prego, cravings, barf? It was all very cryptic, but then it was only a few days ago that Perry made oblique song lyric references on Twitter – before Brand came out and confirmed they were engaged on New Year’s Eve.
[From People]
I’ve tried to figure out if Katy and Russell’s tweets are the only “evidence” of a possible pregnancy, and I think that’s what everyone’s basing their stories on. It’s interesting, I guess. I mean, if she is pregnant, God bless. If she isn’t, that’s fine too, no judgment. I doubt either of them will be the best parents in the world, but they won’t be the worst either. It could be a fun experiment for them, I guess. And Katy’s pregnancy could explain why Brand looks so weird lately. In photos of Brand from the past week, he doesn’t really look… thrilled with the turn of events. More like “shell-shocked.”
By the way, Russell and Katy stepped out in London a lot over the past few days, and photographers got some snaps of Katy’s ring. It doesn’t look huge, but it’s pretty. I think it looks like an estate piece, which is nice if Russell picked it out:
Russell and Katy in London on January 10, 2010. Also, a close-up of Katy’s engagement ring. Credit: INFphoto.com.










































































