Page 4 of 41234


Oct 3
'07
Russell Crowe Is A Genetic Throwback

jek-000190.jpg
Russell Crowe must have undertaken years of therapy to come to this conclusion – he acts out at people because he has low self esteem. Really? It’s not just because you are a bad tempered Aussie?

“I think I’ve got better over the years with just being OK with all that. Any negativity I had with it stems from self-worth issues. “I don’t rate myself or consider myself to be worthy of that sort of thing. So when people approach me my reaction is sometimes negative. But I’m a lot calmer with it now.” The Gladiator star, who was convicted of second degree assault for throwing a telephone at a hotel concierge in June 2005, adds, “(The public) don’t see the crusty reality. They see some sort of sparkling version, and that’s what they want to have contact with. I’m a lot easier about all that sort of stuff now.”

Contact Music

Rusty doesn’t just need to blame his low self-esteem – it seems he’s a genetic throwback as well.

Journalists with the British Broadcasting Corporation have tracked the Australian actor’s roots to Kelowna, B.C. with smashing results.

Crowe’s great grandparents, William and Kezia Crowe are buried in the Okanagan city after moving there in 1947 to run a local auction house.

Stories about William Crowe suggest he would smash crockery if he could not obtain a desired auction bid.

The Canadian Press

Genetics are a powerful thing.

I can see why Russel Crowe would be a happy man nowadays – he is married to gorgeous Dannielle Spencer, has two cute kids, and owns his own football team. Actually, owning a football team wouldn’t do anything for my quality of life, but isn’t that some kind of man-dream? Like a really big TV?

Rusty also has a little golden man named Oscar to cuddle up to at night, if his gorgeous wife isn’t enough. What part of the millions of dollars he is paid per movie, the awards he’s won, and the general adulation that comes in Hollywood stopped him from achieving high self-esteem? We might only see the ‘sparkling version’, but even looking for cracks, your life seems pretty good Russ.

Russell Crowe is shown at the 2005 Venice Film Festival on 9/25/05 thanks to PRPhotos.

Posted in Russell Crowe

Written by Helen         See post for comments
Sep 19
'07
Russell Crowe And Cate Blanchett wanted for Maddy McCann Movie

russellcrowecateblanchett.jpg
Just days after the release of Ben Afflecks latest venture, a movie he directed about a child who goes missing, was postponed because of similarities to the Madeleine McCann case, suddenly we have talk about who will be playing her parents in a movie.

Australian actors Cate Blanchett and Russell Crowe have been tipped to star in a movie about missing English toddler Madeleine McCann.

At least two movie studios are believed to be planning dramatisations of the saga surrounding the four-year-old’s disappearance from her family’s holiday apartment in Portugal in May.

The Daily Express said studio executives were “beginning to whisper” about possible A-list names to play Madeleine’s parents, Gerry and Kate McCann, who have been named as suspects in the case by Portuguese police.

“Obviously, it’s not something that people are going to be making a lot of noise about yet as the investigation is still continuing – anyone who spoke publicly about such a project would come in for a great deal of criticism,” an unnamed movie insider told the newspaper.

Sydney Morning Herald

mccanns.jpg
Interestingly, the two actors considered for the role are Australian, which is the country where the Lindy ‘a dingo ate my baby’ Chamberlain case was tried in the 1980′s. Lindy was found innocent of killing her daughter after six years in jail when it was found evidence in the car was false. There are articles circulating about the similarities between the two cases. There have been multiple movies made about Azaria Chamberlain, so I wonder if the rumour has come about because the cases are similar?

Apart from being considered for a movie or two, Russell Crowe has been a busy man this week – going and supporting an American football team with a pep talk.

He also made a big impression on the University of Michigan football players, who were treated to a pregame speech last Saturday by Crowe, a friend of coach Lloyd Carr.

“I didn’t really know what to expect,” Michigan tailback Mike Hart said. “He was a cool guy. He was funny. Those kinds of guys you think they’d be more uptight, more serious all the time. He was kind of laid back. He looked like he had a good time.”

Added linebacker Shawn Crable: “You see him in ‘Gladiator,’ then he comes in and he has this Australian accent. It’s like, where did that come from? It’s different, calling people blokes and stuff.”

Crable said that Crowe delivered a message – in the Australian accent, of course – about playing as one.

“His speech was nice,” Crable said. “It got us fired up.”

After watching Michigan’s 38-0 win over Notre Dame, Crowe participated in the postgame news conference, then went out to dinner that night with Carr, the coach said.

mlive.com

For those of you wanting to know why he’s there, it’s probably because he owns an Aussie rugby league team. They’re called the Rabbitohs, and I’m not entirely sure what role he plays as their owner, but I can tell you he’s trying to eliminate the gambling machines from the club bar and made it a more traditional bar with bands and beer. Maybe to improve the venue, maybe just to get a venue for his lame band to play in.

Posted in Ben Affleck, Cate Blanchett, Russell Crowe

Written by Helen         See post for comments
Aug 7
'07
Matt Damon is a good investment

gla-000098.jpg

Forbes.com just released an analysis of who gives movies studios the most bang for their buck. I was kind of surprised, but it turns out the best investment is Matt Damon. In a way it makes sense: those “It” actors and actresses command such huge paychecks, that investment-wise, it’s hard to get the same return. For every dollar that Matt Damon is paid for a film, the movie returned $29. Pretty good deal.

“According to Forbes’ first-ever list of Ultimate Star Payback, the movie stars who deliver the best bang for the buck aren’t the industry’s top earners. Matt Damon, the soft-spoken leading man in box office winner The Bourne Ultimatum, turns out to be Hollywood’s best investment. For every dollar Damon got paid for his last three roles, his films returned $29 of gross income. And, surprisingly, former ‘Friends’ star Jennifer Aniston is Hollywood’s most profitable actress, despite duds like ‘Rumor Has It.’ For ever dollar the former Mrs. Pitt was paid for her last three major roles, her films on average returned $17 of gross income.”

[From Forbes.com]

Second place for actors went to Brad Pitt, and third place was a tie between Johnny Depp and Vince Vaughn. Vince Vaughn is the biggest surprise to me. It must be because he makes about $34 a film, so if the film makes $43,000 you’ve got a pretty good deal. Vaughn’s rate is actually about a million a film, a relative bargain in Hollywood terms. Forbes points out that his last three movies “’The Break-Up,’ ‘Wedding Crashers,’ ‘Dodgeball’–have been box office bonanzas relative to their low production costs. (At $52 million, The Break-Up’s budget was roughly 20% of “Pirates of the Caribbean, Dead Man’s Chest.).” The big budget actors like Tom Hanks, Tom Cruise and Will Smith only averaged about $12 in gross income per salary dollar.

The actor who gave the worst return, dollar for dollar? Russell Crowe. Forbes points out that his “standing in Hollywood has shrunk since he scored back-to-back consecutive Oscar nods for ‘The Insider’ (1999), ‘Gladiator’ (2000) and ‘A Beautiful Mind’ (2001). Crowe’s last three films earned on average just $5 in gross income for every dollar spent on the star. His most recent, last year’s ‘A Good Year,’ was made for $35 million, almost one-third of which went to Crowe’s salary. The film earned only $40 million in worldwide box office, making it a huge disappointment for Fox, which produced and distributed it.” Logically, it seems like the opposite should be true. Who would ever have guessed that getting three Oscar nominations in three years could be bad for your career?

You know who is not a good investment? Lindsay Lohan. For some reason Forbes doesn’t even bother mentioning this. Probably because it’s so obvious it doesn’t need stating. Ironically, I bet this report will raise Matt Damon’s salary, thus making him less of a great deal. Oh well. He’s still a good actor, and fun to look at.

Picture note by JayBird: Here’s Matt Damon yesterday at the Ft. Lauderdale International Film Festival. Header image of Matt and his wife Luciana Bozan Barroso from the “The Bourne Ultimatum” Los Angeles Premiere. Images thanks to PR Photos.

jkz-001554.jpg

Posted in Brad Pitt, Jennifer Aniston, Johnny Depp, Matt Damon, Money, Russell Crowe, Tom Cruise, Tom Hanks, Vince Vaughn, Will Smith

Written by JayBird         See post for comments
Jun 8
'06
Russell Crowe is a needy manipulator


An article in the Sydney Morning Herald discusses how Russell Crowe tried to manipulate a journalist into writing positive stories about him, with the promise of becoming his publicist. Crowe had the guy and his wife over to his house several times, initially asking him to promote his sophmoric album to his friends in the press corps. He offered to pay him for his services, but the writer, who has a family and could have used the money, refused for moral reasons.

The journalist, Jack Marx, soon discovered how Crowe gets lauded in the press – he pulls this same buddy scam with tons of journalists, and even phones people personally to discuss negative articles about him.

Crowe befriended Marx and groomed him to write an article about him while he was promoting “Cinderella Man.” Marx initially refused, saying he was too close to Crowe to be objective. Crowe insisted though, and Marx went through with it. When the article came out and it was cautiously positive and believable instead of kissing Crowe’s ass – Crowe turned on him and dumped him as a friend.

And it was during these times that I saw evidence of something that made me wince – Crowe’s bizarre propensity for nickel-and-dime media manipulation. It seemed Russell was running his own parallel, one-man PR fix-it campaign. It was much the same as my own, but he was pitching himself to journalists while I was handling his CD. He’d go through the daily papers and call journalists in person, chastising them for perceived inexactitudes. There was nothing morally corrupt about this, but I found it a silly pastime for a man of his stature. Sometimes it did him no service at all.

He once bragged to me about how he had called a prominent Sydney gossip columnist who had been dumping on him, promising her that should she publish a positive word or two, he would grant her an exclusive interview. Like magic, a nice mention appeared in her column the following week, and the exclusive interview followed. It was doubtful, I thought, this transaction hadn’t been noted by the columnist’s peers, who’d consider her weak and Russell quite the meddler. If he needed an answer for why so many journalists disliked him, I thought, he need look no further.

That I was part of this nonsense was not lost on me, and at times it troubled me beyond mere embarrassment. One evening, I discussed with Russell a particular journalist who seemed to dislike him, and I suggested some approaches that might be useful in changing the journalist’s mind. With a schoolboy laugh, Russell shook his head and declared that if it were too much trouble, he’d just have the bastard killed. He was joking, of course, and we both laughed a lot. But it got me to thinking: I wondered if this had ever happened in the annals of Hollywood’s history with the press. Syndicates have killed for less, and we are talking about multi-million dollar estates…

What’s more, I began to doubt whether my friendship with Russell Crowe was altogether exclusive. There were sightings of Russell taking long strolls with rival journalists. There was talk of him writing a book with another. On the grapevine, I heard of another Cinderella Man article in the works, the local journalist disclosing her friendship with Russell and telling of their late night chatter at the film star’s north coast farm. I had been stroking my own ego with such industry it hadn’t occurred to me that there may be other ponies on the same carousal.

Marx’s article on Crowe came out, and was praised by other writers for presenting the bombastic actor as a decent guy with regular human failings. Crowe was mighty pissed at Marx for not making him seem better than God, and blew him off with a one-line e-mail: “Yeah, yeah, whatever.”

Crowe later wrote him a longer message, completely dismissing him.

Crowe is a total asshole, and the next time you see a positive story about him in the press, realize that he most likely called the journalist or had her over for dinner. That seems to be his pasttime when he’s not abusing hotel staff, trying to pass himself off as a humble singer, or getting paid millions to act in films.

The Sydney Morning Herald e-mailed me this story, and it was quite a useful tip. E-mail tips to info at celebitchy.com.

Posted in Abusive, Arrogant, Russell Crowe

Written by Celebitchy         4 Comments »
May 2
'06
Russell Crowe says Sharon Stone looks like an orangutan


In an awesome quote, Russell Crowe lets loose on Sharon Stone, saying that she’s had a lot of bad work done and looks like a orangutan:

Hollywood hardman RUSSELL CROWE is convinced his former co-star SHARON STONE has undergone cosmetic surgery to maintain her stunning features. The Oscar-winner, who starred alongside Stone in the 1995 western THE QUICK AND THE DEAD, suggests the BASIC INSTINCT actress should change her name because she looks “like an orang-utan”. He says, “A lot seems to have changed. When are you not you any more? At what point do you have to get a name change too? “You can end up looking like a startled chimpanzee. The eyes are gone, the lips are like rubber tyres – or more like an orang-utan that has been kicked in the a**e.” Stone, 48, has always denied having cosmetic surgery and she sued leading Los Angeles surgeon RENATO CALABRIA in 2004 after he appeared to tell an American magazine he had given her a face-lift. The case was settled out of court last year (05) when Dr Calabria agreed to provide free surgery for a charity working with children with facial abnormalities. His lawyer KEVIN LEICHTER said, “Dr Calabria did not perform plastic surgery on Ms Stone.”

That’s hysterical and we can’t wait to see what Stone says back!

Sharon Stone just doesn’t look bad because of plastic surgery. She has a bad personality of course, but she also doesn’t know how to dress. She was photographed at Koi restaurant in Beverly Hills on April 25th. WTF is she wearing here? She’s tied a scarf around her neck like a tie and she’s wearing all black with ill-fitting leather pants and a crocheted jacket with a fur collar over a see through top. That’s just wrong.

Pictures [via]

Posted in Plastic Surgery, Russell Crowe, Sharon Stone

Written by Celebitchy         See post for comments
Apr 2
'06
Russell Crowe tries to act like a humble singer


Swigging from a bottle of port and smoking a cigarette in a non-smoking theatre, Russell Crowe took to the stage with his band, The Ordinary Fear Of God, in Auckland, New Zealand Friday night. Fans, especially women, loved his performance, and praised his ability as an entertainer and singer. Even critics said he has a decent voice, which “has an earthy, roots-rocker sound.” At least one reviewer thinks his songs are amateurish, though, which is probably to be expected:

So far, so stunningly average – but Springsteen, Mellencamp and Costello – even at their worst – are all capable of decent writing.

Crowe’s songs are close to embarrassing – Mickey, about his mob-connected valet’s zest for life; Raewyn about the suicide of his aunt – performed with passion sure, but ultimately dull.

The Ordinary Fear Of God is a band comprised of decent musicians, mariachi trumpet fills combined with stinging six-string solos and rock-steady rhythms. But too often I was reminded of the free concerts I attended at high school, a Youth Group or Christian-oriented band of perfectly decent musicians.

The songs were pedestrian and clearly an agenda, outside of music, was being pushed.

Ironically, Crowe – as an actor – portrays characters in his other job, but in this stage version of himself he seemed so self-conscious, so dedicated to wanting to be a down-to-earth musician, a hack just hamming it up (and drinking a lot while he was at it!), that I’m convinced I saw some of his greatest acting in delivering such hackneyed songs with a straight face.

Even if he’s getting bashed for it, at least Crowe is pursuing his dream to be a singer and is trying to be humble about it.

Here he is at the show. There’s also a picture of a blonde Lucy Lawless at the show with Allan Poppleton and Erica Takacs.

Posted in Music, Photos, Russell Crowe

Written by Celebitchy         See post for comments
Page 4 of 41234
 
 
 
Legal Disclaimer| Privacy Policy | Comment Policy