Stylish Celebrity Escapism
Contributing Writers


Page 7 of 10« First...«56789»...Last »


Sep 14
'06
Tom Cruise likes rasslin’ (gay sex details may bother some people)


A new book about shady Hollywood attorney Anthony Pellicano is set to blow the lid on how Tom Cruise’s romp with a male prostitute was kept out of the tabloids. There’s an entire chapter online, and while it’s quite long it’s a trashy and worthwhile read.

Author Paul Barresi was working as a producer of gay porn films when he spoke to adult film star and prolific male hooker, “Big Red,” a buff readheaded guy who advertised in gay men’s magazines and websites. Big Red approached Barresi about selling his tales of hooking up with some of Hollywood’s hottest guys. Barresi was impressed with Red’s story, and found his claims both believable and verifiable. He arrange to have him speak with a contact at The National Enquirer in exchange for a cut of the profits.

He adamantly stood his guns, claiming that he could enumerate the dates, times and details of various sordid sex acts that he engaged in with his celebrity partners. “I’ve kept a detailed diary and I have receipts from restaurants, hotels, night clubs, plus other documentation as well as eye witnesses who are willing to go on the record to support my claims.”

You can’t get much better than that. Now, I’m thinking if this guy is on the level, I can make a bundle of money in any number of ways. In my mind’s eye, I first saw a story with The National Enquirer…

PAUL: Okay, before we get ahead of ourselves, let me ask you a few other preliminary questions. How many clients do you service on a monthly basis?

RED: Well, now sometimes I’ll take a month or two off, just to catch up but, in a good month, I’ll service about three to five hundred men.

PAUL: You stated you attracted celebrity clientele, one of whom is Tom Cruise. Name some of the others. Just their names for now.

RED: There’s Antonio Bandares, Jason Priestly and country singers Garth Brooks and Randy Travis.

PAUL: Okay, how did Garth Brooks find you?

RED: On boyzusa.com.

Big Red went on to tell how he topped Garth brooks for over two hours with the help of some Viagra and a condom. He said he got paid about $500-$600 and was flown out to service Brooks, who he called a whale.

Compared to that encounter, his sporty jerk-off with Tom Cruise, who dressed up in a little wrestling suit for the occasion, sounds almost chaste. Cruise was in London filming “Eyes Wide Shut” at the time, and was in the last stages of his marriage to Nicole Kidman.

I then brought up the subject of his alleged encounter with Tom Cruise. That interested me more than the others because I knew that’s where the big bucks would come in. The tabs love anything that connects Cruise even remotely to the word gay because there is always a major reaction from him. He is one of the most homophobic actors in the world.

I urged him to continue. This particular encounter, he said, took place in London during the filming of Eyes Wide Shut, on location there.

RED: Marcello (club host) took me to a room outside this club to wait and I just sat there. Then two men came into the room. They told me it would be a very simple job and that they were going to pay me in cash, showing me an envelope with approximately five hundred UK pounds in cash.

PAUL: Then what?

RED: They took me with them in a car and we drove, I think to the Highgate area, to a house. Nothing spectacular. We went into the back of the house where Tom Cruise was sitting on a small sofa. A mat had been spread out on the floor. Cruise, dressed in what looked like a body suit, looked so cute. Either a black or very dark navy blue body suit for wrestling. He had on a little cap thingy, but the chin strap wasn’t attached.

Grinning and gloating at me, he said, “Strip down to your underwear and play with me for a little while.” That’s really the only conversation we had. We played. We wrestled. He was nice to me. I mean, he let me win, then he asked me if it was okay if he could rip off my briefs and told me he would buy me a new pair.

I remember looking very close into his eyes and (I could tell because I used to tint my eyebrows and lashes) - maybe not his brows, but for sure his lashes were tinted because they had been growing out and I could see kind of like a lighter color around the edges of his eyes and if you look closer, he is a very fair skinned man.

PAUL: You wrestled around with him for how long?

RED: About an hour and a half, maybe.

PAUL: And what was going on?

RED: I was in my underwear and he was touching my butt mostly and, his finger - through the underwear touched my anus and he was stroking my balls, just a little bit. It was quick. He whispered in my ear, “It’s okay. Just relax. Just relax.” At one time he actually picked me up and threw me down and said, “I think red heads are really hot, and I hear you’re called Big Red.” Then, once my underwear was off, he got into some serious stroking. He told me to jack off so he could watch. I did and after I came, he threw me a towel. I got dressed and then the two men drove me back to the club in London.

After The National Enquirer passed on publishing Red’s sordid wrestling story, they got a call from - you guessed it - celebrity lawyer Anthony Pellicano, who is currently under investigation by the feds for illegal wiretapping and racketeering.

Pellicano grilled Red on his encounter with Cruise for over an hour and a half, reducing him to a blubbering mess. At the end, though, Pellicano admitted to Barresi that Red’s story was believable and that he knew key details about Cruise to back it up:

After an hour, Red became so petrified, he began looking away and stuttered when he spoke. I thought Pellicano would cause him to either crack or shit his pants. Strange as it may seem, however, Red survived Pellicano’s brutal questioning.

Anthony later pulled me aside and said, “I think this kid’s telling the truth. I find him to be credible.” It made no difference to me. It is well known in celebrity circles, that an accusation doesn’t have to be true, to create a smear campaign. Pellicano cashed in on that concept. A Hollywood star can’t afford even a whiff of scandal, because a tall tale can cause irreparable damage.

Barresi says The Enquirer tipped off Pellicano on the story to get him to check out it’s veracity. Instead of admitting that he believed Red, Pellicano told The Enquirer that Red was making it up, and went back to Cruise for a hefty payoff.

Red’s phone was predictably tapped after his scary encounter with Pellicano, and he often saw an unmarked van outside of his place. He ended up moving to Europe for a while and servicing less dangerous rich people. Barresi only made a $5,000 payoff after all the work he put into grooming Red.

There’s so much dirt in this story it’s amazing. I haven’t even touched the news that this gay hooker claims to have been with Antonio Bandares, Jason Priestly, and Randy Travis. He also says opera singer Andrea Boccelli was a long term client.

I don’t know if it’s true, but it convinced me. If it’s made up, why would they make Tom Cruise’s sexcapade so tame? He wrestled with a guy, touched him, and then watched him jerk off. It doesn’t sound like that much of a scandal if you ask me.

I want to know why women like Angelina Jolie can have well known affairs with the same sex while it’s taboo and career-ending for the men of Hollywood. I only care that Tom Cruise likes the company of men because he denies it so much.

Posted in Scandals, Sex, Tom Cruise

Written by Celebitchy         13 Comments »
Sep 5
'06
Suri Cruise photos to be published tomorrow


Photos of a baby that’s proportedly Suri Cruise will be published in Vanity Fair tomorrow. Tom and Katie supposedly had the pictures taken by famous photographer Annie Liebowitz soon after “little” Suri’s birth, so her current age is impossible to tell. Speculation is rampant that Katie was already pregnant when she hooked up with Cruise, which would explain the suspect birth certificate, the couples’ unwillingness to take the baby out in public, and the odd size variations in Katie’s pregnant belly. Cruise has no other biological children, and is said to be sterile.

Katie was photographed looking tired and dazed outside of an LA spa, where she was treated to a much-needed massage.

The exclusive photos reportedly show baby Suri nestled against Tom’s neck as he sleeps. Another is said to show Suri sleeping on the couple’s bed, with Katie grinning at the camera.

That picture is a far cry from one taken of Ms Holmes this week, showing her looking bleary-eyed and frazzled.

Bags under her eyes and looking dazed, even Hollywood superstars cannot avoid the harsh realities of first time motherhood.

So as Katie Holmes made her way to a Los Angeles hotel for a relaxing, full-body massage, she looked to have the weight of the world on her hunched shoulders.

Struggling out of a chauffeur-driven car, and into the exclusive Beverly Hills Hotel, the stress of the past five months was evident for all to see.

Despite doing her utmost to hide her bleary-eyed face behind an oversize designer handbag, the 27-year-old actress, who gave birth to her daughter Suri in April, could not avoid the harsh glare of the photographers’ flashbulbs.

Wearing a pale pink shirt and her hair worn long, she plodded wearily into the hotel’s luxury spa suite for a £120 massage and facial.

Katie and Tom are said to have insisted on perfect pictures of their newborn. The photoshoot took place over 21 days and required lots of retouching. Suri was rumored to be a “runt” at the time, but in all likelihood she’s much bigger than she should be for a four and a half month-old.

In the only pictures seen of Suri so far, taken via helicopter outside the Cruise compound, Suri looks much bigger than a four month-old baby.

Posted in Babies, Cults, Katie Holmes, Magazines, Photos, Scandals, Tom Cruise, TomKat

Written by Celebitchy         4 Comments »
Sep 4
'06
Kelly Osbourne elopes (update: gag wedding & photos)


Perez Hilton claims to have an exclusive that Kelly Osbourne pissed off her entire family by marrying a guy she’s only known for one week. What’s worse is that the two were married at an Irish rock festival in a blow-up castle!

Ozzy & Sharon Osbourne are livid with daughter Kelly.

Multiple sources confirm exclusive to PerezHilton.com that Kelly has just had a quickie wedding.

Hey, at least she’s not in rehab again!

The reality TV alum married a musician by the name of Matty, from some nowhere near famous band.

And, making things grand and truly Osbourneish, Kelly knew her now husband for just a little over a week before the two got married at a music festival in Ireland in a blow-up castle!!

If this is actually true, how long will it take until they get it annulled? I give it a full 4-6 weeks, because Kelly seems a lot more mature now.

Update Thanks to pinklumpysugar on Lime-Light.org for alerting me to the fact that fake weddings are part of the Electric Picnic music ceremony in Ireland, and that Kelly’s wedding was just for laughs:

The Big Love Inflatable Church will be bursting at the seams with merriment and mayhem at the Electric Picnic. The Reverend Duncan Pritchard will be overseeing the proceedings, where you can find your perfect partner, invite your wedding guests and get hitched, in the only inflatable church in the world. Alongside him will be his jilted, dishevelled brides and some carefree choir boys getting down.

Update And thanks to Sky.co.uk for these photos post-ceremony, and confirmation that it was indeed a gag. Kelly’s boyfriend is Matt Derham of The Field. I’ve never heard of him, either:

Here are some pictures from X17 online of Kelly kicking a ball on the beach in early August. She looks like she’s so ready to be a wife and mother. In fact she looks like she’s had a couple kids already. You go Kelly!

Posted in Hookups, Kelly Osbourne, Perez Hilton, Scandals, Weddings

Written by Celebitchy         5 Comments »
Aug 17
'06
Mel Gibson is relaxing at home and not in rehab at all


Mel Gibson might have sought treatment in an inpatient facility and checked out, he might be getting some sort of addiction therapy as his publicist claims, or maybe he’s just laying low and hoping this whole mess will blow over. Whatever Mel is doing, he’s not in rehab:

After his traumatic arrest, and anti semitic outburst recently, Mel Gibson piously promised to get help - but THE ENQUIRER has learned that the long-time alcoholic has NOT checked into rehab, he’s at home.
The former Oscar winner is refusing to enter a traditional rehab, and is instead trying to gain a hold of his problem via outpatient therapy. According to his publicists’ assistant Veronica Pinto, regarding treatment, Mel is in an ‘ongoing program of recovery. That’s it.’

Many question Mel’s seriousness regarding recovery since he is apparently yet to seek intensive therapy for what seems to be a major problem.

Mel doesn’t care. Maybe he didn’t go to rehab because the philosophy of recovery contradicted his freaky cult religion. It could be possible that he figures his career is over anyway and just doesn’t give a shit.

Have you seen the best Mel Gibson political cartoons we posted? They’re priceless. I hope one of the artists now tackles Mel’s lack of commitment to rehab.

Here are some of the pictures from Mel’s famous night out that you’ve already seen.

Posted in Addictions, Drunk, Mel Gibson, Scandals

Written by Celebitchy         See post for comments
Aug 12
'06
The Best Mel Gibson political cartoons

The Mel Gibson story may be fading from the headlines, but the memory of the uber-rich religious director’s anti-semitic outburst won’t leave our collective consciousness for years. He’s going to be the punchline, the scapegoat, and box office poison for a while. (And C-List actors will keep bringing him up to either support or scorn, whatever suits their publicity needs.)

Cagle.com has lots of clever political cartoons about the Mel Gibson incident. Mel’s career in film and his multiple over-the-top apologies provide plenty of fodder to make fun of him.

Each of the following artists granted permission to post their work here.


Peter Lewis, Australia
Lewisart.biz



Adam Zyglis Buffalo, NY
The Buffalo News
www.adamzyglis.com



Grumpy Old Indian Man Stokholm, Sweden
goyim.wordpress.com



Michael de Adder, Halifax, Nova Scotia
The Daily News
www.deadder.net



R.J. Matson, NY
The New York Observer and Roll Call
rjmatson.com



Mike Lester, Rome, GA
Rome News-Tribune
www.mikedujour.com



Doug Marlette, FL
Tulsa World
dougmarlette.com


Posted in Art, Mel Gibson, Scandals

Written by Celebitchy         2 Comments »
Aug 11
'06
What people are saying about the supposed Suri pictures


So these far-away pictures of a supposed baby Suri where published on X17online, and I found myself reading all the comments on JustJared. I’m rather fascinated by the sordid baby Suri story, and personally believe that something incredibly fishy is going on. Like the pictures of the Loch Ness Monster (which some claim were just the trunks of submerged circus elephants bathing in the Loch) all is not what it seems. There’s something ominous and creepy about these photographs and they look staged.

Here are my favorite comments, organized by category, from JustJared.

These pictures are really fucking creepy, and make it seem like Katie is trapped

Ugh, I got the shivers looking at this picture. It is very Omen-esque…like the scary nanny and the mansion. So very scary. - MMM

Looks like a scene out of a horror movie. Woman gazes out of window of large country manor house as child of satsn lulls behind her in crib plottin end of the world. Whatever! So tired of Tom, Katie (Kate) and even the child that they could show up at my door and I wouldn’t care. - HeyBabyHeyBabyHey

It’s a scene from Amityville Horror meets Rosemary’s Baby. - Niecy

The Baby is too big. It’s older than they claim or it’s a doll:

It looks too big to be a baby…it’s probably Tom wearing diapers. It is truly scary as mentioned in other comments…I think when I do see the baby I will still never belive it is truly the couple’s real child. :( - Natalie

Uh, that looks like a 2 year old…and something is DEIFINTELY rotten in Denmark. I am so over Tom “Crazy Pants” Cruise. - redonkulous

this baby looks too big to be 4 months!! katie looks scarey looking out the window. i got chills, they’re multiplying! - diane

My friend’s baby is 10 months, 28″ tall and 18 pounds. My baby is 3 months old, 23″ tall and 15 pounds. Don’t make me cry by saying Suri couldn’t POSSIBLY be that big already- my guy’s a Sumo! :) - UberGoober

These pictures are staged:

I’d feel bad that we were peeking into their house if the whole thing didn’t scream “STAGED!!!!” I hope Katie is planning her escape. - mickey

Fake…its a prop. Plus, why would you leave a baby just laying on a bed alone? Its staged and fake?!?! - Me

It’s wrong to peep into the Cruise’s mansion:

am i the onlyone who finds it kinda wrong that they peeked into their windows with a telephoto lens? sure i want to see thekid,but this makes me feel kinda weird. - ter

I can’t stand Tom or Katie, but I think the paps are going too far. I’d be pissed if they were taking pictures of people in my damn house! Disgusting. What a culture we live in. - Erin

i think katie is trying to spot the helicopter. wellthe baby (actually the whole pic) looks way to grany to see anything, so vanity fair still got their scoop. however i think it’s wrong to take these kind of pics, even though i can’t bring myself to not look at them. still i feel kinda bad for them.- Bertz

The way these photos were taken is horrible indeed! Celebrities can’t even stand at their fuckin’ windows without being photographed! No miracle that Suri hasn’t seen the day of light yet - when they even take pictures of her when she’s IN the house! - Angelika

About the conspiracy:

Anonymous , I totally agree with you. I know an insider, as well, who swears that Tom is gay, that he knows of assorted men and “rent boys” that have been brought in for Tom (he’s that close to the situation) and that the baby Nicole miscarried was her driver’s (not Ewan MacGregor’s) and Tom was PISSED that she violated her contract, just shy of its 10-year stipulation…that’s why he TRIED to get away with not giving her the pay-off on their business contract sham of a marriage. People have been PAID to keep their mouths shut; others have been PAID to lie their asses off! Tom has NOT fathered any biological child because he has not had sex with any of his so-called wives…they have ALL been under contract in their “marriages” to pose as a real wife and have been paid well and signed papers that they cannot disclose ANY information on Tom, their relationship or his involvement with the Church of $. So, you will NOT be hearing any negative or contradictory comments from Nicole. He even bugged her house after they split. There is a baby, but it was born back in December. That is the reason Katie’s belly has fluctuated so much in size…yes, she was pregnant, but she was pregnant long before it was announced. They cannot show the baby at this time, because the baby is too big to be passed off as a four-month-old, because it is, in fact, eight months old. The baby IS NOT TOM’S! As far as the paps go, this is an invasion of privacy. I don’t know if that picture is really Suri, yet. But Suri is not a four-month-old baby! Tom may release photos when she gets large enough to “fudge” her age, but right now, she could NOT pass for a four-month-old. End of story. - whisper

Stop thinking about this shit that long! Just because there haven’t been any photos around yet Katie wasn’t even pregnant at all, Tom isn’t the biological father or the kid is somehow ugly or what?? That’s absolutely crazy, and I feel sorry for everyone like Aisling who invent crazy, weird stuff in their heads. That’s complete bullshit, there haven’t been any pictures of Tom’s adopted kids at the beginning either, he just obviously didn’t want it - look at all the Scientology rules, people aren’t even allowed to do baby talk in Suri’s presence, so why should the public be allowed to even SEE her? Just forget about this baby and live your own life! You’ll see the pictures when they’re released, end of story!! - Angelika

Whatever’s going on, these creepy ass pictures don’t clear it up!

Meanwhile the Beckhams have been invited to see the miracle changeling in person, but the list of rules are weird as hell. Maybe by inviting the Beckhams and telling them they can’t touch, photograph or talk to the baby, Cruise’s camp hopes to explain why the poor thing hasn’t seen the light of day.

Posted in Babies, Katie Holmes, Photos, Scandals, Tom Cruise, TomKat

Written by Celebitchy         3 Comments »
Aug 9
'06
Elusive baby Suri supposedly captured on film!


First people said they saw her, and now there are supposed photographs that will be published in Vanity Fair this Fall. Come on, why the delay?

SURI Cruise’s days of being a mystery baby some believe doesn’t really exist are about up. Sources say Vanity Fair has landed the first photos of the care fully guarded tot spawned by Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes last April. The pictures were taken by ce lebrity snapper Annie Leibovitz and will be published this fall, spies say. Both Vanity Fair and Cruise’s reps had no comment. In recent weeks, celeb pals of the couple, including Tom’s ex Penelope Cruz, have tried to dampen skepticism by insisting they’ve seen her.

You know they say that the photographs were taken by Annie Liebovitz to add a smidgeon of legitimacy to the claims that Suri’s been photographed. Why would they take pictures now ahead of time and then release them in the Fall? They have to know that the pictures will get out and no amount of legal threats will keep them off the blogs like little Shiloh’s online debut. Unless there really are no fucking pictures at all and they’re just trying to buy time until they can come up with a baby.

By saying the pictures were taken now in April they also get the added advantage of masking the baby’s age. Babies age a lot in a few months. If they claim the pictures were taken now in April they have a few months to procure a newborn baby and get pictures taken just in time for publication.

This baby has never been photographed even far away and there’s a huge bounty on its head. No baby accessories, strollers, or carseats have ever been seen near its parents or their vehicles. There are very peculair circumstances surrounding its birth, with a questionable birth certificate. Only a few “eyewitnesses” have come forth - with strange statements that sound coerced.

Yesterday Tom’s rep said that pictures would be released “soon.” All of sudden they’re claiming that Annie Liebovitz has already photographed the baby. This is bullshit.

Update: Thanks to Angelika for pointing out that the baby was said to be photographed back in April, not now. That makes it even more suspect because they have until the Fall to get pictures of a newborn.

Posted in Babies, Katie Holmes, Photos, Scandals, Tom Cruise

Written by Celebitchy         6 Comments »
Aug 8
'06
Suri to be unveiled (when Tom feels like it)


MSNBC’s The Scoop borrows our unoriginal observation by calling Suri the “Loch Ness Monster of celebrity babies.”

The whereabouts of baby Suri has become so hotly debated that some wags are calling Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes’ child the Loch Ness Monster of the celeb world: some are claiming to have seen her, while others insist she’s just a myth.

One rumor is that protective pop Top Gun is reluctant to trot out the child because he’s worried about kidnapping threats. His spokesman denies that buzz — and even denies that Cruise is “reluctant” to show Suri.

“He hasn’t been reluctant,” spokesman Arnold Robinson tells the Scoop. “They will be making a decision to release the photographs [of Suri] shortly.” Will the pics be released to a single or few media outlets, or will it be a general release? “That’s part of the decision they’ll be making shortly,” he said.

Yeah, they’ll make that decision, uh, shortly. Just like they’ll get married any day now. All those preparations at the Celebrity Scientology Center were indeed for a big party as we reported, and not for a supposed wedding or non-existent Suri’s Scientology baptism. It was their 37th anniversary of brainwashing people, and John Travolta and Kelly Preston showed up, lest the Scientologists reveal their darkest secrets. TMZ has a video of Travolta dancing or something at the party, but it didn’t load for me. I’m so dissapointed.

Penelope Cruz said she’d met Suri, but then totally backtracked and made a weird roundabout statement about how she didn’t want to have to lie anymore.

It’s important to keep living life as an observer and not just feel like you’re being the thing observed because then you start looking at yourself from the outside instead of really alert…I forget people are looking at me in a situation like that, like yesterday.”

Here are two guys who work at a radio station protesting outside a Scientology center in Portland. They’re “demanding the Cruise baby.” You really don’t have to watch this, you get the point.

The best is their protest sign with Cuba Gooding Jr. saying “Show me the Baby!”

“Where are here, do si do, show us Suri then we’ll go.” “It’s not fair, we all lose, please show us Suri Cruise”

They ask “Will we ever see the Polaroid of that little baby mongloid?” OMG That is so un-pc, I’m sorry, but it made me laugh.

Posted in Babies, Cults, Katie Holmes, Scandals, Tom Cruise, TomKat, Video

Written by Celebitchy         See post for comments
Aug 2
'06
Mel Gibson hates gay people too


Gallery of the Absurd has this fabulous new Mel Gibson bumper sticker. If they would create actual bumper stickers like this, they would sell out.

The pictures of Mel partying it up before refusing a ride home, getting arrested and going apeshit have come out. He looks every bit the aged, washed up bigot.

Mel also said back in the day that he hates gay people, and that he’s such an asshole because he’s a closet case:

With Mel Gibson getting heat over those anti-Semitic comments, some foes are adding fuel to the fire by reminding people about the “Passion of the Christ” director’s anti-gay comments in 1992. When Spanish newspaper El Pais asked Gibson about homosexuals, he shot back: “They take it up the [bleep].” Then pointing at his behind, he said, “This is only for taking a [bleep].” He told the reporter that he was once worried that if he became an actor, people would think he was gay. “But with this look, who’s going to think I’m gay?” he asked. “It would be hard to take me for someone like that. Do I sound like a homosexual? Do I talk like them? Do I move like them?” After some people were offended by his comments, Playboy asked him if he would apologize. “I’ll apologize when hell freezes over,” he said.

He really must hate himself most of all for ruining his posh lifestyle making obscure vanity films.

People are pointing out that if Roman Polanski violated a 13 year-old girl and got his career back after fleeing the country, Mel can too. It took Polanski over twenty years. In Mel’s case, he can probably put his extreme bigotry behind him in about ten.

Maybe he should just invest his money or go into real estate development.

Posted in Abusive, Arrogant, Drunk, Mel Gibson, Scandals

Written by Celebitchy         1 Comment »
Aug 1
'06
Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes to marry this fall?


Tom Cruise has supposedly agreed on a fall wedding to seal his suspicious relationship with young Katie Holmes. No one quite believes that their changeling baby exists, even if there’s one prominent actress who’s willing to vouch for it. (Why didn’t Will Smith speak up too, huh?) So announcing a vague official date for their sham nuptuals should stem the rumors that they don’t really have a baby and their relationship is contractual, right?

A spokesman confirmed yesterday that the couple, who welcomed daughter Suri into the world in April, are planning a ceremony at one of the Top Gun actor’s homes before winter arrives.

The pair’s spokesman Paul Blach said: “As far as I know, the plans are for late summer, early fall.”

He also confirmed that the ceremony will be held at one Cruise’s properties, but gave no further details.

Despite plans for the nuptials going ahead, it is rumoured that Katie’s parents will not attend the event if the pair wed in a Scientology ceremony.

There’s also a rumor that “hollywood insiders” are “scratching their heads” over Suri’s nonappearance and that Tom and Katie are fighting over how to introduce the fictional infant to the public. Someone read the blogs and made this shit up, because there’s no baby to show or relationship to lose:

“It’s been three months,” a Hollywood insider told The ENQUIRER.

“People are starting to scratch their heads now over Tom and Katie’s baby because now it is really starting to look weird.

Tom’s spokesman denies the couple’s relationship is strained, but sources say the strain of keeping baby Suri under wraps is taking a toll on Tom and Katie’s relationship and that they have split over how to deal with the situation. “Tom’s total obsession with secrecy has sparked a host of bizarre lies and fabrications that threaten to tear the couple apart,” continued the source.

The only reason Tom and Katie will get married at this point is to try and salvage Tom’s tanking career. I don’t buy any of the weird shit surrounding their relationship or supposed baby. Where’s the baby carriage, where’s a baby seat, where’s a carrier? They need to work harder to cover their deep, meandering tracks.

Posted in Babies, Katie Holmes, Scandals, Tom Cruise, TomKat, Weddings

Written by Celebitchy         1 Comment »
Page 7 of 10« First...«56789»...Last »
Recent Comments:
  • vdantev: Such an interesting interpretation of heterosexual masculinity her ‘husband’ is.
  • vdantev: Behavior that reflects badly on the franchise is a big no-no.
  • aleach: ew haha look at her “mom” in that picture!! she thinks shes hot shit. im embarassed for this...
  • Sunnyjyl: Parents pay through the nose for these things. I didn’t realize these archaic events still took...
  • aleach: i really wish i could just slap this bitch! even if she doesnt agree with what some of you call “new...
  • diane: Her family are very protective and very religious so there is no way that this would ever happen.
  • Claire Hegarty: I am a Health expert as seen on TV and Ihave dealt with many people who have gone through what she...
  • diane: What people have to understand is, she was a star when she was very young and the life she had then is the...
 
 

Celebitchy is a celebrity gossip site written by several independent authors. The opinions of the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Celebitchy, LLC. All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Articles are based on rumor, conjecture, and published information in other sources. Celebitchy, LLC makes no claims that content is valid, accurate, or true. Celebitchy, LLC and the authors contributing to it will not be held liable for damages resulting from errors, omissions or falsehoods published on this site. It is not the site or the contributing authors' intention to defame or malign any particular group, religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual. Celebitchy, LLC is not responsible for content on linked or quoted sources. All comments made by visitors to the blog are the responsibility of their respective authors and are only sporadically monitored. Celebitchy, LLC will not be held liable for comments in any way.