'08

In recent weeks, Pamela Anderson has been constantly photographed at events and just walking around in what looks like either flimsy hot pants or underpants. I’m not sure why in the world Anderson would think this look is appropriate for attending an art opening or walking through airport security. Yes, she’s a total slut, but she’s also the mom of two young, impressionable boys. And she’s got more than enough money to buy herself a cute pair of jeans or even a skirt if she’s so intent on flashing some skin.
As usual, Anderson had to be the center of attention, even if it’s because she’s dressed worse than a trampy streetwalker (no offense to streetwalkers). Seriously, the woman is 41-years-old, and not to say she has to dress like an old maid, but come on – put some freakin’ clothes on.
Her poor sons – she’s always going on about how she would never exploit her children but um, what message is she sending them when she can’t even wear pants out in public? Oh right, I forgot, mommy’s an exhibitionist. My bad.
Pammie is going to be the new (or should I say ‘old’…girl looks tired) face of Vivienne Westwood’s spring/summer outfits campaign for 2009. That might be a good thing – maybe Westwood can give the woman some proper clothing!
Brandon and Dylan – maybe you could ask your dad to buy your mom some pants for Christmas!
Earlier this year, Pam had a gig as magician Hans Klok’s assistant in his Las Vegas show where she wore a gold leotard. Maybe she just got used to having her ass cheeks hanging out every day and hasn’t realized that what was acceptable on a Vegas stage isn’t really so great in everyday life. Or, maybe she’s just desperate for attention, and since her only claim to fame is her body, she has no other way to get people to notice So, what gives? Why can’t the woman wear pants in public?
Picture note by JayBird: Here’s Pamela returning from Las Vegas and baring her butt at L.A.X. Images thanks to Bauer-Griffin.




























