At this point I just admire the hell out of In Touch. They’ve gone after Kris Jenner, using their sources close to her deceased ex husband, on the covers of the last three issues and the one coming this week is yet another doozy. These anti Kris Jenner covers must sell well for them.

About a year ago, In Touch spoke to Jenner’s younger lover, a guy named Todd Waterman, whom she was banging and bankrolling while she was married to Robert Kardashian. (Todd told In Touch that Kris ruined her daughtesr with her superficial values and quest for fame.) It turns out that Kris was also banging Todd while she was in the early stages of her relationship with her now-husband, Kris Jenner. In Touch allegedly learned this gem back when they got their exclusive interview with Todd. They held onto it for a year for some reason, maybe a statute of limitations or just the need to have something to pull out during a slow gossip week. I love that they did this – the title of their latest issue is like a Tyler Perry movie title, “Married to a Madwoman”. (Credit: Kaiser) What’s more is that Kris allegedly paid Todd off for his silence by giving him $15,000 to $20,000 for one guest appearance on “Keeping up with the Kardashians,” about 10 times more than the typical amount the show pays for guest spots.

In Touch can exclusively reveal that Kris Jenner cheated on her current husband, Bruce Jenner, with former soccer player Todd Waterman — the same man she was accused of seeing behind the back of her ex-husband, Robert Kardashian.

An insider confides in the new issue of In Touch, on newsstands now, that Kris even went so far as to pay off Todd in order to prohibit him from ever speaking about her or the Kardashians again, so that Bruce — and the world — would never find out about it.

“Last year, Kris persuaded Todd to appear on Keeping Up With the Kardashians. It was her way of paying him off and making sure he stayed silent about their torrid past,” an insider close to the Kardashian family tells In Touch.

Although Kris has denied that she ever cheated on Bruce or paid off Todd, Todd has confirmed to In Touch that he continued to hook up with Kris even after Bruce, 63, moved into Kris’ Beverly Hills home. In January 2012 — six months before he would be paid off by Kris and appear on her reality show — he told In Touch, “We were still sleeping together when she started dating Bruce.”
But while Todd held nothing back a year ago, now he is less forthcoming about their relationship. When contacted by In Touch in January, he confirmed a financial deal with Kris, saying, “I really wish I could talk to you, but I can’t because I’m under contract with the family to not talk about them.”

Normally, someone is paid about $1,500 to appear on the show, but Todd received a onetime payment of $15,000 to $20,000, believes the insider: “He appeared under the pretense that they were having closure on their relationship. Little did everyone — least of all Bruce — know that she was gagging him.”

Kris’ passionate affair with Todd supposedly ended when she met Bruce on a blind date in 1990. But that wasn’t the last time she and Todd saw each other. “He was always around, and Bruce was completely in the dark,” the insider reveals to In Touch, adding, “He was the Camilla in the Charles-Diana relationship.”

[From In Touch]

Of course I believe this, Kris was bragging about this affair to promote her book. BUT I don’t think this Todd dude told In Touch this a year ago. I think he sold this new bit of information recently as it’s too convenient for a “source” to tell this to In Touch while Todd says on the record that “I’m under contract with the family to not talk about them.” I also want to read all about how Kris “forced” Bruce to get plastic surgery. I’m not sure I buy that part of the story. Bruce allegedly enjoys cross dressing, I don’t know if he needed to be forced into anything that made his features more feminine. Maybe that’s why he’ll never divorce Kris, he knows she’ll keep his secrets.

Kris Jenner is shown yesterday at the Hollywood release party for Heather McDonald’s book, My Inappropriate Life. Credit: FayesVision/WENN.com. It’s been months since we’ve seen Bruce out with her.

I don’t want to oversell this week’s Star Magazine cover story, but it’s really enjoyable. It’s silly and funny and mostly BS, and if you want to pick up a fun tabloid this weekend, it should be Star. Personally, I never care for the “Best & Worst Bodies” or “Diets” or whatever issues, although I will make an exception for the Best & Worst Dressed of any tabloid. But who would have thought to compile a list of the Best & Worst Hollywood lovers? Genius. Anyway, a lot of celebrities are included in the lengthy cover story, and here are my favorites:

*Angelina Jolie is “boring” (according to Billy Bob Thornton) but Angelina and Brad “regularly do it behind the waterfall in their pool.”

*Channing Tatum “loves getting things going by giving his wife a lap dance, and he often gives Jenna a full body massage after sex!”

*An ex-lover says Colin Farrell is “as wild as Mickey Mouse… we made love three times but the actual sex only lasted 10 minutes.”

*Taylor Swift’s lovers come and go so fast because she’s a prude – “All she wants to do is kiss for hours which is probably why none of the guys she dates stick around!”

*Jennifer Aniston is a “spoiled princess” in bed – “She just lays there and wants to do none of the work… she’ll complain that she’s too tired or that her back hurts. She makes up every excuse to skip sex and never initiates it.”

*Robert Pattinson is “amazing in bed,” says an ex-lover. “We’d glance at each other throughout the night because it made it more exciting when we got home.”

*John Mayer is “sensational in bed” says an ex. “Every girl I know who has slept with John says it was the best sex of her life. I’m not sure how he does it, but after girls sleep with him, they’re ruined – totally hung up on him and left wanting more.”

*Ashton Kutcher prefers threesomes – with two chicks.

*Ben Affleck puts flowers around the bed and he’s into giving massages – and making sure his woman’s needs are taken care of before his own.”

*Blake Lively is a “real sexpot” – she “sends sexy photos and videos to Ryan Reynolds and loves getting in sexy costumes for him. She uses toys while having sex too.”

*Ryan Gosling “has a laser focus when making love – he’s completely in the moment and absolutely amazing.”

*Bradley Cooper is “dull as dishwater in bed… he talks in nonstop French because he thinks it’s a turn-on, but it’s like being in bed with Pepe Le Pew!”

*Adam Levine is more concerned with stretching out than his partners.

*Prince Harry is “very sexual” and “he loves lotions and scented body oils. He knows how to please a lady and make her feel like she’s the only one he’s ever slept with.”

*Jennifer Lopez is a screamer – “If she enjoys what you’re doing, she’ll scream so loud that the windows will rattle.”

Hmm… I think I’ll start with some Channing Tatum, then go for some Prince Harry, and maybe finish up with some Blake Lively.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

The National Enquirer’s cover story last week claimed that former child star Macaulay Culkin, 31, is a drug addict who is addicted to heroin and Oxycontin, and regularly takes a cocktail of dangerous prescription drugs. Macaulay’s rep denied the story and tried to appeal to common decency to get other outlets not to repeat it. His rep wrote: “We beseech the responsible media to consider the source and its reputation and to please not perpetuate this destructive and insulting story by pursuing it any further.”

In response to Macaulay’s denial, The Enquirer has named their source and challenged Macaulay to a drug test to disprove their claims. Even if he’s telling the truth and isn’t addicted to anything, you know he’s not going to take them up on it. Here’s the Enquirer’s report where they double down on the story:

The NATIONAL ENQUIRER hopes the cover story on its latest issue, “Home Alone’ star Macaulay Culkin Addicted To Heroin – Only 6 Months To Live!” will act as a dramatic and much-needed wake-up call to the 31-year-old actor.

Our advice to Macaulay is to seek professional help to avoid the same tragic fate of other beloved celebrities, including Whitney Houston who died earlier this year.

We believe that the former child star should be doing everything he can to get the treatment he so desperately needs – and which could have saved the life of his friend Elijah Rosello.

Her family confirmed to The ENQUIRER that she did drugs with Macaulay before her drug-related death in March.

Should Macaulay’s representatives continue to deny The ENQUIRER’s accurate and detailed report, we are ready to offer him the opportunity to take a blood test administered by an independent medical lab.

It is a fact that as The ENQUIRER tracked Whitney Houston’s descent into her drug hell, she refused to admit she had a problem – and Whitney was represented by some of those people now denying Macaulay’s potentially deadly problems.

The ENQUIRER editors would hate to see Macaulay end up like Whitney.

[From The National Enquirer]

It’s true that The Enquirer was running stories about Whitney being back on drugs before she died. Then when she died they put a photo of her in repose in her casket on the cover. So it’s not like they were motivated out of concern for her, you know?

The “Six Months To Live” headline is one the Enquirer uses a lot to move copies. They take celebrities, have a quack doctor look at photos of them and speculate on their general health, and then proclaim that they have X amount of months or years to live. In a couple of cases they’ve been right (I looked over past issues and they did predict Michael Jackson and Elizabeth Edwards’ demise) but most of the time it’s just a dubious effort to entice people to buy the tabloid. What I’m saying is that I hope The Enquirer is wrong. I hope that Macaulay has way more than six months to live and that he’s not addicted to anything except Red Bull. (A can of which he’s been seen with virtually every time he’s been photographed this year.) Some of you have floated the theory that he’s sick with an undisclosed illness and that may be why he looks so gaunt. I hope that’s not true either, but you never know.

Macaulay reportedly attended Natalie Portman’s wedding over the weekend. He’s said to be old friends with her. That’s good news.

I found this video of Macaulay at NY Comicon in October, 2011 as part of the Robot Chicken panel. (He voices a character on the animated show.) Macaulay licks Seth Green’s face in response to a member of the audience asking Seth for a “sexy pose with Macaulay.” Macaulay does not seem sober at all. Maybe he’s just really high.

Macaulay in February, 2012. Credit: FameFlynet

Whitney Houston in her coffin is still on the cover of The National Enquirer, on newsstands everywhere. The issue won’t be replaced until Thursday or Friday of this week. In the two stores that I’ve checked, The Enquirer has been moved behind the other tabloids so that the only thing visible is the headline. Several of you commented on the story that you saw the issue out and visible at a child’s eye level.

Well not only is this photo presumably devastating to Whitney’s family, it could seriously damage the business of the funeral home where it was taken. The owner of the facility where Whitney was interred, the Whigham Funeral Home in Newark, N.J., told The Daily News that the leak of the photo was “devastating” to her personally and to her longstanding family business. What’s more is that the owner swears that security guards were with Whitney’s body 24 hours a day up until the private family viewing. So someone in Whitney’s inner circle had to have taken and sold that photo. Despicable.

The respected owner of Whitney Houston’s funeral home said Friday she’s “devastated” a photo of the singer in her open casket appeared on the cover of the National Enquirer.

Carolyn Whigham wants fans to know her family-run business did not sell the now notorious image and that she’s “horrified” by accusations her close-knit staff is to blame, she told the Daily News.

“We did not take that photo. We did not sell the photo. We would never do something like that,” the second-generation CEO of the Whigham Funeral Home in Newark, N.J., said.

“Whitney was a friend,” she continued. “I’m the one who flew to Los Angeles and got Whitney from the coroner’s office. I did everything to protect her.”

She said a deluge of distressing emails from irate Houston fans now has her fearing for her staff’s safety.

“One email said that if the person owned a dog, and the dog died, they would not come to my funeral home,” she said with sadness. “I’m worried about my employees, worried about me. I’ve been in business since 1943. This is my name, my character. Honestly, this is my life’s work. We would never do something like this.”

She said Houston’s family has made it clear they do not blame her business.

“I am very confident they are on the same page with me. Family friend Tyler Perry was on the Steve Harvey (radio) show this morning, and he said emphatically he knows we did not do it,” she told The News.

She said security was with Houston the entire time her body was at the funeral home.

“They were there 24 hours a day. They slept there with her. She was never alone, anywhere,” Whigham said. “The only time security fell back was when the family had the private viewing Friday. We weren’t involved with that. The family invited its own guests.”

[From The NY Daily News]

Several of you who work in the funeral industry commented on this story last week and we’re grateful to you for your insight, particularly to MorticiansDoItDeader and another commenter who just used an ellipses as a handle. Morticians said that the funeral home should have asked visitors to surrender their cellphones as a precaution given the high profile person interred there. She also noted that the embalmers did a good job with Whitney.

There was also the issue of Whitney being buried in 1/2 million worth of jewelry, which Morticians and many of you considered irresponsible by the Enquirer to put out there, as it could invite grave robbers. Morticians noted that it’s not likely Whitney will be buried in that jewelry. “We take that off when everyone leaves and give it back to the family after the service.” The owner of the funeral home said basically the same thing to The Daily News about the jewelry. “That’s crazy. It’s not true.” Poor Whitney and poor Bobbi Kristina. I hope she’s ok, but I’m glad we haven’t heard much about her. Hopefully her family is around her at this time.

This is a version in which I’ve blurred over the photo. In the version on newsstands, Whitney’s full face is shown. She’s made up and looks like she’s sleeping

I still remember when OK! Magazine featured a cover photo of Michael Jackson after he’d died. It was sad and unnecessary, and many people found it both disrespectful to the family and to Michael’s memory. That’s how I feel about this Enquirer cover photo of Whitney Houston’s open casket. This will be featured on the issue that’s about to hit newsstands today, and it makes me wonder: will it have a “family shield” to cover up this image of a dead person? My son is at an age where he can understand death, but when he was younger he had no concept of it and I wouldn’t want to have to explain it to the little guy in a supermarket checkout line. I’d rather my kid see some T&A (and he can see two daddies or mommies any day) than a dead person staring out at him. It’s not the image so much as the questions and sadness it brings up.

Last week The National Enquirer seemed to have stooped to a new low when they published photos inside the magazine that recreated Whitney’s death scene. They even had a photo on the cover that looked like Whitney laying dead face down on the bathroom floor. (Really! Here’s that cover above, thanks to Sammie.) That picture was captioned “Photo Re-Created” below in smallish lettering, but larger font screamed that they had “Exclusive Crime Scene Photos.” Well they didn’t have to use a fake Whitney to recreate the poor lady dead in her casket, since someone at a private open casket viewing scored a payday by snapping a photo and selling it to the tabloids. Here’s more:

Whitney Houston fans expressed shock and outrage Wednesday after the National Enquirer printed an image of the iconic singer in an open casket on its cover.

The morbid photo, purportedly taken inside the family’s private viewing at the Whigham Funeral Home in Newark, N.J., last Friday, shows Houston’s body lying in her half-opened, polished bronze casket.

It shows the dead pop star wearing what looks like a purple dress along with a brooch pinned to her chest and an earing sparkling in her ear.

The headline claims she was buried wearing $500,000 worth of jewels and gold slippers on her feet.

Facebook and Twitter users lashed out at the tabloid, calling the move trashy and shameful.

“MADD at who ever sold Whitney Houston’s pic of her in a casket,” reality star Evelyn Lozada, from VH1′s “Basketball Wives,” wrote on Twitter.

“Whoever sold the photo of Whitney Houston in her coffin to the National Enquirer is a vile, twisted, evil and unscrupulous sub-human,” London-based fan Christiana Mbakwe tweeted.

Even celebrity blogger Perez Hilton called it a “tasteless, insensitive, morbid thing to do” on his eponymous website.

Of course, the death photo is hardly without precedent. The National Enquirer famously ran a photo of Elvis in his coffin in 1977.

[From The NY Daily News]

In 2007, The Enquirer ran a “photo recreation” of a deceased Anna Nicole Smith in a body bag after her death. We covered that, and some outlets claimed that the photos were really of Anna after her death. At least one paparazzi agency did claim to have photos of Anna’s corpse, which lent credence to the stories that it was really her.

Let’s play devil’s advocate for a moment: Whitney looks pretty in that photo in her casket, she appears at peace, and some may say that she lived in the public eye so it’s fitting that this photo be published. That reasoning doesn’t account for all the people and loved ones she left behind, particularly her 18 year-old daughter, Bobbi Kristina. Bobbi is already going through the worst time of her life, how is this going to affect her to have to see her deceased mom on a tabloid cover? That’s just ridiculously mean. My heart has been sinking the whole time I’m writing this, because I’m imagining seeing a loved one in their casket before going through the awful process of attending their burial. We have open casket viewings to provide closure to family and loved ones, the dead person is not meant to be publicly gawked at.

I deliberately didn’t include a link to the photo. It’s all over the place though and if you have even moderate Google skill you can easily find it. Hell, just go to the store on Friday and it will probably be there already.

After Sandra Bullock went through all that heartbreak with Jesse James (and arguably Ryan Reynolds, many people didn’t buy them as a romantic couple, but I did!) a lot of us were rooting for her to find a decent non-douchebag non-famous type. If this latest report is accurate that may have happened for her, hooray! OK! is claiming that Sandra has found love in the arms of a producer named Jonathan Komack Martin. Bullock’s rep issued a surprisingly specific denial that the two have been “best friends for 15 years” and that “he co-produced the ‘George Lopez’ show with her and is part of her and her son’s life. He is Ryan Reynolds’ producing partner and they are all very good friends. In addition, the recent photo of them was taken after being followed for two and a half hours to Palm Springs for a memorial.” So he’s just her buddy and they’ve been friends for over a decade, or did it recently develop into something more? Does the guy play for the other team? I’m getting that impression from the rep’s statement. Here’s more, thanks to Hollywood Life.

Is there a love triangle between Sandra, Ryan, and his BFF Jonathon? An insider says that she’s definitely moved on from Ryan and that she’s getting her mojo back by spending lots of time with the ‘new’ guy!

Sandra Bullock, 47, has a new lease on life — not only because she’s mom to son Louis, but also because she’s found someone who treats her right and makes her laugh, reports OK! Magazine.

On Jan. 22, Sandy and Ryan Reynolds‘s BFF, Jonathon Komack Martin, were snapped stepping out of a white Porsche to attend a private party in L.A. An insider says that Jonathon was “very attentive” and “didn’t leave her side all afternoon.”

So who’s this “new” guy?

From what we know, Jonathon’s the son of a TV sitcom producer and a successful Hollywood producer himself. And he’s actually not really new to the Oscar-winning actress; in fact, they were introduced 15 years ago and even co-produced together on the George Lopez show.

But whatever Sandy’s true feelings are towards him, her lips are zipped.

“She’s being extremely secretive, though, which is typical,” says the insider. “Even when probed, she won’t reveal much more than saying what a great guy Jonathon is.”

So how does Ry-Ry, 35, feel about his producer friend being stuck to the hip with his former rumored gf? “Ryan isn’t annoyed or angry about Sandy spending so much time with Jonathon, but it’s a surprise to him,” reveals the insider.

Unlike Ryan, who’s been busy dating 24-year-old Blake Lively, Jonathon’s been a dependable companion for Sandy to lean on.

“She’s been pretty down for months. But these days, there seems to be a spring in her step,” explains the insider who feels Jonathon’s kept her smiling. “Sandra can trust Jonathon and right now that’s what she needs most. She’s just been so let down in the past, she really needs a good guy who can be there for her.”

[Details from OK!, writeup by Hollywood Life]

I so want this to happen for Sandy, but it sounds like all they’ve got is the detail that this guy attended a party with her and was by her side, which was explained away in detail by the rep. Who knows what’s true or if OK! is only going by the paparazzi photos and doesn’t have any other source. I like that she’s got her private life on lockdown, and I like that she hasn’t jumped into another relationship and is focusing on being a mom. I don’t think there’s much to this story, but I would be happy if I’m wrong. Sandy deserves some good lovin’ and I still find her awesome. JJ didn’t taint her in my eyes.

Update: Sandra gave a really sweet statement denying this story to Gossip Cop. She said:

”For over a decade now, I have been so lucky to have Jonathon and Ryan as my friends, and I agree with the reports that they are both very handsome and a great catch!”

She continues, “But the only man who has stolen my heart is my son. And for now I wouldn’t have it any other way!”

[From Gossip Cop]

That was really nice, and I believe her. Oh well.

Jonathon Komack Martin and Sandra Bullock are shown on 8-1-11 at the premiere of The Change Up. She’s also shown at the same premiere with Ryan Reynolds. Sandra and her son Louis are shown today in LA, where she was taking him to school. Credit: WENN.com

Star Magazine has an inset story on their cover this week all about Sandra Bullock’s $20 million defamation lawsuit against her scumbag ex, Jesse James, for talking smack about her publicly. However, the story just says that Sandra could file a suit against Jesse if she were so inclined and that she could make it for around $20 million, according to some expert Star found. They only go so far as to quote a vague “source” who claims Sandra is considering it. My favorite part of this story is where Star speculates that Sandra won’t sue Jesse, also as they’ve speculated, because Jesse could potentially have some awesome dirt on her that he would bring out during a lawsuit. Isn’t this what we’ve heard all along? Like how can Sandy, “America’s Sweetheart,” have married a douchey neo-Nazi and still have kept her pristine public image? However, I think that Jesse was so butt hurt by getting rejected after cheating on Sandra that he would have already spilled Sandra’s secrets if he had any. Here’s more of Star’s story:

One month after shocking accounts of her husband’s wild cheating drove Sandra Bullock to file for divorce in April 2010, an emotional and repentant Jesse James appeared on Nightline and claimed, “I still have hopes of saving some sort of relationship with Sandy.”

Now it seems those sentiments were hollow, because the words Jesse has used over the last year to publicly describe his life with Sandra have been dipped in venom.

And his latest thinly veiled broad-side against her — when he sneeringly referred to how he had “married some Hollywood actress… I’m not what I became,” during a recent appearance on the reality series American Chopper: The Build-Off — could end up hurting him where it hurts the most: in his wallet!

An insider tells Star magazine that while Sandra, 47, “has consistently taken the high road by never talking about Jesse since their split, I don’t expect her to play the shrinking violet forever if his jabs have secretly been causing her emotional distress.”

And she has a powerful weapon at her disposal to strike back. Sources tell Star she could hit Jesse, 42, with a defamation suit, with one legal expert telling Star that “asking for $20 million in damages would not be out of the realm of possibility…”

Sandra “has every right to initiate a defamation lawsuit against her ex husband if she believes that any of the public statements he’s made about her have been defamatory,” noted NYC defamation lawyer Richard Ancowitz tells Star…

“I imagine that even the prospect of legal action would lead his lawyer to counsel Mr. James to keep his thoughts about Ms. Bullock to himself…”

“If Jesse keeps revealing personal information about Sandra, she could also stop him by suing for invasion of privacy,” Aaron Morris, a defamation attorney… tells Star…

Though Sandra’s rep denies that she is considering legal action, the legal source adds that she could also “go after Jesse for breach of contract if they had signed confidentiality agreements as part of their divorce.”

There is a possible consequence that could keep Sandra from taking action, the legal source tells Star. “It could open the door the defendant to disclose more embarrassing personal information as a defense against the claims. That information would then become public in the court record.”

[From Star Magazine, print edition, December 26, 2011 and via OK!]

This “lawsuit” is as much a figment of Star’s imagination as Jennifer Aniston’s pregnancy with twins, but it’s still fun to speculate about. You know that Sandra is just actively ignoring this guy and he keeps throwing jabs at her hoping to get some kind of response. She’s not going to say a thing about him and that hurts his widdle ego more than anything.

Sandra has been doing the press rounds for Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, in which she plays the widow of a 9-11 victim. She’s only in the film for about 20 minutes, and the lead is the young boy who plays her son, Thomas Horn. She has a new interview on The Today Show in which she talks about her personal experience with the September 11 attacks (sad) and about hearing the last messages that victims left their families (double sad). Families shared the messages from their loved ones to help with research for the film, and Sandra called those “an incredible gift.” She does have a fun rapport with Matt Lauer and gives him crap throughout the interview, but it’s not enough to lighten the mood. Watching the press for this film just gives me the impression that it’s not going to do well at the box office given the subject matter. It may get some nods at awards time, though, especially for Horn.

These photos are from the 12-15 premiere of Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close and also feature Thomas Horn and Tom Hanks. Credit: WENN.com

Radar Online and Star Magazine got ahold of a paternity lawsuit against Justin Bieber by a 20 year-old woman who claims that her three month old son was fathered by him during a tryst in a bathroom following one of his concerts. This story takes the cover of Star this week, and it’s not a bad idea despite the fact that the lawsuit reads like fan fiction. It goes into unnecessary and ridiculous detail and just sounds like it’s completely fabricated. If it’s true it’s really good gossip, I’ll give Star that. Here’s more:

Teen pop icon Justin Bieber got a 20-year-old Californian woman pregnant during a backstage tryst and admitted it was his “first time,” she claims in a sensational lawsuit obtained exclusively by Star magazine.

Mariah Yeater filed court papers saying that her sexual encounter with the “Baby” hit-maker occurred on October 25 of last year, after he performed to a sold-out crowd at L.A.’s Staples Center.

As RadarOnline.com previously reported, the woman has filed a bombshell paternity suit against Bieber, alleging he is the father of her three-month-old baby.

In a hand-signed affidavit, sworn under the penalty of perjury, Yeater wrote that a security guard working for Bieber approached her and “asked if I wanted to meet Justin Bieber” before whisking her backstage.

She was 19, at the time.

Bieber’s rep denies the allegations, telling RadarOnline.com: “While we haven’t yet seen the lawsuit, it’s sad that someone would fabricate malicious, defamatory, and demonstrably false claims. We will vigorously pursue all available legal remedies to defend and protect Justin against these allegations.”

Mariah claims in her lawsuit, which was filed in a California court on October 31: “After waiting for a short period of time with several young women, Justin Bieber appeared and engaged me in conversation.

“Immediately, it was obvious that we were mutually attracted to one another, and we began to kiss. Shortly thereafter, Justin Bieber suggested that I go with him to a private place where we could be alone.

“I agreed to go with him and on the walk to a private area, he told me he wanted to make love to me and this was going to be his first time.

Mariah also told the court: “After walking away from the other people backstage, Justin Bieber found a place where we could be alone — a bathroom.

“We went inside and immediately his personality changed drastically. He began touching me and repeatedly said he wanted to f*ck the sh*t out of me. At the time I asked him to put a condom for protection, but he insisted that he did not want to.

“In his own words, he said that because it was his first time he wanted to feel everything.”

Justin then “quickly took off my clothes,” she said — and the pair had sex.

Bieber’s reps strenuously deny the woman’s claims, but Yeater wrote in her court declaration: “He was on top of me with my legs around him. At the time I was on top of some type of shelf. The sexual intercourse itself was brief, lasting only approximately 30 seconds.”

A court has scheduled a hearing on the matter for December 15.

Star magazine broke the exclusive story of the Bieber lawsuit and details are in the new issue — on sale Thursday.

[From Radar Online]

Bieber’s people are denying this claim, and I honestly expect that he’ll take a paternity test and be done with this. They tell TMZ “While we haven’t yet seen the lawsuit, it’s sad that someone would fabricate malicious, defamatory, and demonstrably false claims. We will vigorously pursue all available legal remedies to defend and protect Justin against these allegations.” This reminds me, though, of that photo that came out earlier this year of Bieber making out with a fan. Millions of teens all over the world are inexplicably hot for him and he’s a pubescent pop star with raging hormones. I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s hooking up with groupies. We may think that he looks like a chick but there are obviously plenty of girls who would go there. Ewww, now I’m imagining Bieber getting his freak on in the bathroom.

Here’s Justin performing in Brazil on 10-10 and 10-5. Credit: WENN.com and Pacific Coast News

With that title I don’t mean to say that Jennifer Aniston is pregnant again, but that OK! is calling her pregnant again when that might not be the case. Their last “Jennifer Aniston is pregnant” cover, or at least the last one that we bothered to talk about, was in March of this year. At that time I did a composite of OK! Magazine covers declaring Aniston pregnant, and there were three others that I could find from 2010 and 2009. It’s been a whole six months since we ran that story, so I may as well include those older covers here again. They range in veracity from deliberately misleading to entirely made up, and include keywords like “exclusive,” “confirmed” and “revealed.” At least in this case they’re admitting pretty much on the cover (above) that the story is based on photo assumptions. They could be right too, as a lot of you have been wondering the same thing. I doubt it, though. Here’s more.

Living in NYC with Justin Theroux, Jennifer Aniston can’t stop smiling – and seems to be showing a bump

As fall begins chilling the New York City air, freshly minted Manhattanite Jennifer Aniston has swapped her tank tops for jackets, scarves and peacoats as she walks hand in hand — while smiling ear to ear — with beau Justin Theroux along the winding streets of their West Village neighborhood. But outerwear can’t cover up an obvious change in her svelte physique — a curvier, more buxom shape — and the suggestion of a bulge around the belly.

And so tongues are wagging: Is Jen pregnant at 42?

“She hasn’t announced it, but all of her friends seem to think it’s finally happened,” an insider tells OK!. “Whenever anyone hints around the question, Jen gets really giggly and shy. It certainly has all of her friends buzzing, and Jen seems to be loving it!”

If Jen is with child, it wouldn’t be surprising. As one close pal notes, she and Justin share a desire to start a family “immediately.”

“Jen would be an adoring mother,” her best friend, Kristen Hahn (a bridesmaid at Jen’s wedding to Brad Pitt) tells OK!.

“She would have boundaries, but the adoration would be big, big, big.” And solid, unpretentious Justin seems like excellent daddy material. “He’s a really good guy,” the friend says. “He makes Jen really happy and brings out the best in her. Justin’s down to earth and doesn’t handle fake people or situations. And he isn’t put off by Jen’s fame. He loves her and everything about her, and that includes that his life is now public.”

Also public are the couple’s displays of affection — unusual for Jen. She was never the clingy, hand-holding type, but with Justin she’s as demonstrative and dreamy-eyed as a sophomore dating the star quarterback.

“She’s glowing; every time you ask how she’s doing, she gets a schoolgirl smile and laughs,” another good friend tells OK!. “She hasn’t been this happy in a long, long time. You can really see what a difference Justin has made in her.

Aniston moved to New York, she’s in a new relationship, and she’s eating out a lot. Her routine is probably different, and maybe she doesn’t have time to work out like she used to. She looks fabulous as always, but she may have gained a little weight that we can barely notice, it happens. Those comments from Aniston’s BFF Kristen Hahn about what a great mother she would be came out over a week ago, and I’m pretty sure she was asked that question directly. It’s not like Hahn is the source for this article or anything. That said, I would love to see Aniston have a baby. I know it sounds cheesy, but she seems solid in her relationship and I think she would make a good mom. She’s always said she wants kids too, so I would bet she’s happily trying. Plus it was like a month ago that US ran their “Jennifer Aniston: Baby Countdown” cover story. That sounded to me like it was from her publicist. This story, not so much.

And here are some of the older OK covers calling Aniston pregnant.

March 21, 2011 “A Baby On My Own”

July 5, 2010: “Yes! I am Having a Baby”

April 19, 2010 “Confirmed: Finally, a Baby for Jen!”

October 5, 2009 “Exclusive: Pregnant at 40!”

9/26/11. Not looking pregnant at all.

9/28/11. Totally normal stomach. She needs a bra though.

9/30/11. Covered up a little, but still not looking pregnant to me.

Photo credit: Diane Cohen/Fame Pictures and Pacific Coast News

Sandra Bullock already has a baby, but that didn’t stop OK! Magazine from trying to move copies by making it sound like she’s going to have another one with her maybe-lover, Ryan Reynolds. In the article, the “insider” quotes just suggest that she could have a baby with Ryan if she wanted to and that medical intervention could help. Last week, Star claimed that Ryan was considering adopting Sandra’s current baby, Louis, whom she adopted early last year, and that they were also considering adopting another child together. So this just sounds like more fan fiction in that vein. I guess Sandra Bullock covers sell. You know that they don’t have any “insider” feeding them personal information about Bullock. She proved that when she dropped the adoption news bombshell at a time when her husband’s serial cheating scandal had been the biggest gossip story for months.

“Sandy would love nothing more than to give Louis a brother or sister,” a source close to the affable actor tells OK!. “And Ryan could be her ticket to having a child of her own!…

“Sandra is certainly not too old to try for a baby – especially with help from a fertility doctor,” says the source. “Can you even imagine how cute a child would be with Sandra as the mom and Ryan as the dad?”

Now, “She’s found the perfect person and she can’t wait to expand her family with him,” a friend tells OK!

Of course, the 34-year-old Ryan has something to say about that. And by all accounts, it’s “When do we start?” One of four brothers, he’s definitely a family guy.

“The main reason Ryan and his ex-wife Scarlett Johansson split was because he was desperate to have kids and she was eager to concentrate more on her career,” Ryan’s friend tells OK!

[From OK!, print edition, September 19, 2011]

It goes on, but you get the picture. I know a lot of you don’t like Ryan Reynolds, but I do and I’m hoping that this romance with Bullock is real and that these two have a long relationship. I get that people think they’re just good friends or that this is a publicity stunt, but it’s verifiable that they’ve been spending a lot of time together. They’re probably not at the stage where they’re talking co-adoption or anything. For as much as Reynolds is said to have played the field post-split with Scarlett, I get the impression that he’s a faithful one-woman type of guy and is looking to settle down. Things could be more serious between him and Sandra than we assume from the outside.

These photos are from The Change-Up premiere on 8/1/11, except for the last one, that’s from 5/31/09. (Credit: WENN.com)