This is exactly how I lay in bed too! Diane Kruger and I have so much in common. We both put on fur Uggs, drape a fur biscuit-cover on our asses, and pose provocatively on white comforters. It’s like we’re the same person. Diane is interviewed in the new issue of GQ, to support her role in Unknown, the Liam Neeson film (that he’s promoting in Esquire). The interview isn’t anything big, but Diane did do a big photo spread for the magazine, all of it animal-themed, all of it in bed – you can see GQ’s slideshow here. Here’s the little mini-profile:
One of the more bizarro details in the making-of-Inglourious-Basterds story is that Quentin Tarantino did not want to cast Diane Kruger in the role of Bridget von Hammersmark—the screen icon and Nazi turncoat—because he did not believe Kruger was really German. Evidently Tarantino was unconvinced by her blond hair, blue eyes, and flawless Master Race complexion, not to mention the slightly more compelling evidence that she was born in Lower Saxony, christened with the awfully German surname Heidkrüger, and is totally, completely, indisputably German.
“You know how it is,” Kruger says. “Sometimes filmmakers get hung up on something. I basically had to fly to Germany and show him my passport.”
Tarantino’s disbelief was so peculiarly at odds with basic facts that one wonders if he just didn’t have the heart to tell Kruger he thought she wasn’t up to the job. At least that would have made sense. That Kruger delivered such a bold, brassy turn in Basterds was—just bein’ honest here—more than a little stunning, because—still bein’ honest here—her acting career did not begin with much promise. She was so forgettable in Troy and National Treasure that we forgot she was in them. But now Kruger has our full attention.
In conversation, she is much more Bridget von Hammersmark than Helen of Troy: It’s easier to imagine her matching you shot for shot than launching a thousand ships. In her new film, the stolen-identity thriller Unknown, she stars alongside Liam Neeson—though to hear her tell it, “alongside” isn’t quite the word. “I’m five foot seven, but Liam’s about six foot…I dunno, ten? He’s like a bus next to me.” Funny, we forgot he was even on the screen.
[From GQ]
I’ll admit, Inglorious Basterds changed my opinion of Diane too. She was so great in that film. And one of her big scenes was with MICHAEL FASSBENDER. See, I got to mention him today. Diane is only one step away from the Fassdong. And that is why I love her. Oh, and she and Joshua Jackson are really cute together. That too.













That second picture makes it look like she’s wearing a giant diaper. That said, I love Diane and she’s gorgeous.
cute! natural animal fur is so amazing to the touch. And Diane is my main girl crush.
the last picture wowwy
gorgeous but not loving the theme!
Stop with the dead animal hides already!!
@Kaiser
I thought your southern climate would be a bit too warm for so much fur but I can see how your “minions” are kept in line with those cleated boots. (Must be hell on those expensive sheets)
She’s pretty but these pictures are stupid.
YUCK!
quite hot other than the fur, though.
i agree with #1 & 6 too.
That second pic is ridiculous. But it’s a yes for me with the fur porn. Lol.
She stole my move! That last picture is my come-hither secret weapon for my imaginary bf, Jeremy Renner. But instead of pelt, cashmere is the cover of choice. Damn it, Diane!
@Racheal
“come-hither secret weapon”? Shakespeare meets Thunder Dome. I know someone you’ld like (lol).
I feel like Liam Neeson is getting all the parts in dumb movies that would have usually gone to pre-meltdown Mel Gibson.
And January Jones and Diane Kruger as his love interests? Ew & puh-leeze. (Also Diane Kruger plays a cab driver. Snort.) If these are the best parts these women are offered, Hollywood is a depressing place to be a young actress in the 21st century.
It would be better if she was posing with an actual wolf instead of feet made of a skinned one.
Wolf boots = gross
Wolf = awesome
not sure who she is but she looks like a young Natasha Richardson.
Ugh, I just lose so much respect for anyone who wears or poses with real animal fur. It instantly makes them ugly, inside and out. All opinions of Peta and their ilk aside (and mine are low), there’s no excuse for glamourizing some of the very worst torture.
And in the 21st century, there’s no way anyone’s doing it out of sheer ignorance. You have to know. And you’re doing it anyway? Ugh.
@kristen, my thoughts exactly. Well, first it was “why is she wearing a pillow case?”
This is a terrible shoot. Everything looks stilted & staged. Diane looks like a bunch of sticks tied together. She doesn’t translate well into stills.
I think she’s annoying and anorexic. Most of her movies are terrible.
@ Rita
Send him my way. JR is my imaginary bf after all. 😉
No good.
I agree about the animal fur (looks stupid). But, I think most likely it’s fake, we don’t know, so let’s not get Peta on her, but really if they wanted an animal wild theme a wolf would have been so much hotter especially with her half naked next to it. That’s styling and I’m not holding it against her.
… mostly cause of course I too go to bed just like that (me and Kaiser share a brain). Naked with a fur blanket. and nipple tassels .. just more natural that way 😛
I don’t even get these pictures. What do they have to do with the movie? Sometimes I have to roll my eyes at magazine stylings.
Gotta love these anti-fur white knights here. Fur looks great. You know what else’s great about fur? That once it gets thrown away, it actually decomposes in the nature, instead of all this synthetic crap anti-fur people promote, that will pollute the nature and in all have much greater impact on nature than a piece of fur, that comes handy when your winters’ temps fall under -20 Celsius and is organic. You’re so goddamn short-sighted. I’d LOVE to see you wear cotton and linen where winters are harsh. Wearing anything else, including synthetic materials, contributes to the destruction of the environment where the animals you so protect live in.
That said OH GOD DIANE, please, I lack lesbionic tendencies, but I might just reconsider my orientation for you.
ech…..
…..and the unempathic, narcissistic side of the actress emerges. I think fur sucks. So does DK.
Hope she’s ready for the torrential downfall of comments from animal lovers everywhere.. Frankly, whether or not it’s coming. I think that’s what bugs me most about this photoshoot. She’s not dumb – she knows this can only get her mor publicity whether good or bad… and for that manipulative reason alone would i take the extra step of smacking her.
@Rasputina – being anti-fur does not equate to promoting synthetic products.. Your logic is really poor. I’m fond of ethically sourced wool and cotton… not polyester… and I live in Canada….
R
My Mom passed away & among the items she left me is this gorgeous, full length mink coat. I have never been a fan of fur & I doubt if I will ever wear it. If I donate it to some organization, what the heck are they going to do with it?? I want to do Mom justice. Any ideas??
Yes, everyone should wear fur Uggs to bed. These pics are stupid, but it’s probably something men would like.
For once, I hate fur.
To Commenter #25:
Spinner,
Here’s a link to an article that explains how people with fur coats they don’t want can donate them to help living animals.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/unleashed/2010/02/dead-animals-help-living-animals-donated-fur-coats-hats-and-trim-make-cozy-nests-for-rescued-wildlif.html
it looks like she is rolling around in road kill.
not a good look at all.
To jinni…
Thanks so much for the link. I will check it out.
Yucky about the fur – it is completely gross. She is a beautiful woman, so why didn’t she just tell them “no” to wearing dead animals on her body! She just perpetuates the “glamor” of wearing fur!
@endo, I’m in Canada too, and I don’t wear fur, however I sure wouldn’t toss it off as an option if I was way up north I can tell you. And I’m a vegetarian. Cotton and wool is probably not going to cut it.
btw, bringing a live wolf into the set? lol. k.
Awful, awful photos. I’ll blame the photographer and stylist for this mess…
To Spinner:
You’re welcome.
You’re far more short-sighted than I am if you think that the damage done by synthetic fabrics (which are NOT the only alternatives to fur, actually) to animal habitats outweighs the damage done by trapping or breeding them, keeping them in unlivable conditions, and slaughtering them (or not) before skinning them. Are you seriously positing that?!
And I’ve survived 23 harsh Chicago winters (and one Siberian winter) without an ounce of animal skin or fur on me.
I think it’s funny how everyone has something to say about her wearing fur but nothing about ” flawless Master Race complexion”. I mean, really? Is it the 40’s?
what a tasteless shoot,,,,,,,,,,